Chapter 1 - Approaches To Operational Auditing
Chapter 1 - Approaches To Operational Auditing
The term “operational auditing” conjures up different images for internal auditors.
It may be used to mean any of the following:
The audit of operating units such as manufacturing plants, depots,
subsidiaries, overseas operating units, and so on. While the audit scope may
cover only accounting, financial and administrative controls it may be
broadened in scope to cover the administrative and operational controls, risk
management and governance processes of the operating unit under review.
The audit is how the functional areas of a business (such as sales, marketing,
production, distribution, HR, etc.) account for their activities and exercise
financial control over them.
SCOPE
A key issue for a business and its internal audit function to decide upon is whether
the scope of internal audit work in an operational area of the business should be
restricted to a review of the appropriateness of, and extent of compliance with, key
internal controls or should be a more comprehensive review of the operation
generally.
So COSO’s broad view of internal control is that internal control (i.e. management
control) is everything that management does in order that there is reasonable
assurance the business will achieve all of its objectives. A narrower view of
internal control is that it is only one of a number of facets of management—among
others being planning, organising, staffing and leading. It is true that these facets
overlap and an internal audit which intends to focus more narrowly on key internal
controls is likely to need to address planning, organising, staffing and/or leadership
issues to some extent, since deficiencies in these may weaken control. But there
will be many aspects of planning, organising, staffing and leading which are
neutral in their effect on the functioning of key controls but which contribute to
providing reasonable assurance of the achievement of efficient and effective
operations.
The audit function, however, in operational auditing will have to define those
aspects of the organisation which are to be subject to review. In practice, of course,
this will vary considerably between organisations, and will be related directly to
the nature of the business and the way the organisation is structured. Example
• management and administration
• financial and accounting
• personnel and human relations
• procurement
• stock and materials handling
• production/manufacturing
• marketing and sales
• after sales support
• research and development
• information technology
• contracting.
The activities covered in financial institution and health sector-specific sets are
Sector: Financial institutions
• branch security
• branch operations
• management
• treasury dealing
• investments—new accounts
• investments—account maintenance
• investments—account statements
• secured personal loans
• unsecured loans
• commercial lending—new business
• commercial lending—account maintenance
• cheque accounts
• ATM services
• credit and debit cards
• new mortgage business
• mortgage account maintenance
• mortgage arrears
• mortgage possessions and sales
• mortgage mandates
• mortgage annual statements
• treasury environment
• staff accounts
• securities.
Sector: Health
• purchaser contracting
• provider contracting
• general practitioner fund holding
• charitable funds
• use of health centres
• private patients
• welfare foods
• residential accommodation
• joint finance
• residents’ monies
• cashiers
• family health service authority
• road traffic accidents
• nursing homes
• trading agencies
• insurance products
• pharmacy stores
• risk management
• cash collection—car parks
• cash collection—telephones
• cash collection—prescriptions
• cash collection—shops/restaurants
• cash collection—staff meals
• cash collection—vending machines
• income generation
• staff expenses
• losses and compensations.
Note: No time should be expended during the audit engagement on issues which
are immaterial to the achievement of management’s objectives. Nothing should
appear in the audit report of the engagement which is immaterial to the
achievement of business objectives by management.
Note: The audit findings will be addressed to the level of management (higher
level of management) that needs to know and that is capable of ensuring
appropriate action on audit findings is taken.
Steps:
1. What are your objectives?
2. What information do you need to be receiving so that you know whether
these objectives are being achieved?
3. Can you show us the information or evidence?
4. Established Audit Objectives (Focus of auditors)
5. Draw up audit program (list of detailed audit procedures)
a. confirming the reliability of the management information
b. undertaking audit fieldwork so as to develop audit recommendations
on issues they are already aware of with respect to incompleteness,
lack of clarity, inconsistency and untimeliness;
c. determining whether other significant events are occurring which
should be reported to the oversight function.
Auditing for the Three and Six Es
• Economy – means “doing them cheap” – with, for instance, unit costs for labour,
materials, etc. being under control. Economy is the ratio between planned inputs
and actual inputs in terms of unit costs of given quality. (Actual cost < budgeted
cost?)
• Efficiency – means “doing things well” – smoothly, for instance with good
systems which avoid waste and rework. Efficiency is the ratio of actual inputs to
actual outputs. Every organisation, whether a service organisation or a
manufacturing business, has such a conversion process.
• Effectiveness – means “doing the right things” – i.e. achieving objectives.
Effectiveness is the ratio of actual outputs to planned outputs (i.e. planned
objectives) Budgeted output = Actual output?
• Equity—avoidance of discrimination and unfairness; acceptance and promotion
of diversity.
• Environment—acting in an environmentally responsible way.
• Ethics—legal and moral conduct by management and staff.
Value for money auditing takes account of the three Es. It frequently makes
extensive use of performance indicators in the form of ratios and other statistics to
give an indication of value for money—especially when trends are explored in
these performance indicators over time, or variations in performance are identified
and explained between different operating units
BENCHMARKING
Benchmarking can be defined simply as a comparison of one’s own performance
in a specific area with that applied by others in compatible circumstances. As a
technique it is founded on the premise that there may be viable alternative ways of
performing a process and fulfilling a requirement. The principal objectives of
benchmarking are likely to include:
• maintaining a competitive advantage in the appropriate market;
• establishing current methods, best practice and related trends;
• ensuring the future survival of the organisation;
• maintaining an awareness of customer expectations (and being able to address
them);
• ensuring that the organisation has the appropriate approach to quality issues.