Open navigation menu
Close suggestions
Search
Search
en
Change Language
Upload
Sign in
Sign in
Download free for days
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views
Settle
Uploaded by
Abdullah Al Shanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save Settle For Later
Download
Save
Save Settle For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
0 ratings
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views
Settle
Uploaded by
Abdullah Al Shanto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Download now
Download
Save Settle For Later
Carousel Previous
Carousel Next
Save
Save Settle For Later
0%
0% found this document useful, undefined
0%
, undefined
Embed
Share
Print
Report
Download now
Download
You are on page 1
/ 9
Search
Fullscreen
248 SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENowegg. __ Hence, the settlement (AH) can be easily determined by the above equation, afte = ing C, from the consolidation test data. Compression index (C,) can also be roqa¢ ut. mated more quickly and easily without a consolidation test, and on the knowledge .,
ano co 249 5510" pnt 0.45x5 oo" = p16 S014 m=1.522m—- 15.22 em eee =15.22em Ans, “ Ca 2 9.22 A ie aioe 2 ap ta dept [ he present eit ly ‘8% and the specific gravity of eo" surface, The natural water oil of! rh gt nd clay, tM met omer table is located at 4.4. m below the ground surface. The average submerged unit ye we is 10.6 KN/m? and the unit weigh; of sand k : fH ee rolagloal evidence if le ‘ocated above the water-table is 17.2 3, Fro! 1 is normally consoli- tt terete Building that will we} on sand above the clay, is ject ase the effective over-burden yon the clay by 42 kN/m?. Esti- pene iement ofthe building. Fine sand elt s, We will first estimate the yressure (Jp’ OF Pg) coming on aie yer before the building is con- oscil "ie will consider the centre of “iy layer depth (A-A), to estimate on ditions, as shown in Fig, 9.8, wipe effective vertical pressure caused gaAis due to sand and clay both. It is egal to 12m Fig. 9.8 Py Now You for sand Yor sand = ths lor day is given as : G-1 Yous = | Fae | ho where G = 2.75, w = 0.38 But e = w . G for saturated soils = 0.38 x 2.75 = 1.045 eub for clay * 3-9 + Yous for sang % 6.8 ™ + Yor sang * 4.4m Ai) 0.6 kN/m! (given) — 7.2 kN/m3 (given) 141.045 2.045 Substituting the values in (i), we get i. Po = 8.39 x 3.9 + 10.6 x 6.8 +17.2 x 4.4 = 180.48 kN/m? "ng settlement Hq. (9.16), we have 2.75-1 15 i (73) x981= 23 «39 kim? Ay = CeHo log, Pot? 1teg Po where p, = 180.48 kN/m?, Ap = 42 kN/m? (given) Hy = clay depth = 7.8 mee ee EAI G of clay in natural condition = e, = void ratio of, ga 10d talent areas he s Also, C, is given y ee — sg) = 0.009 16-101 = ae 032478 jog, BOMEES 21.129 m = 11.23 em Hence, OH = 341.045 10 180.48 =11.23em Ans. Hence, settlement expected = 1 De Example 9.3. The following observation are recor’ on lest ona fay saturated specimen an Initial height of specimen =20m Diameter of specimen. = 75mm Specific gravity of soil grains =2.77 Water content (final) = 39% Applied pressure 0 50 100 200 400 800 ; in kN Final dial gauge 100 359 499 632 768 39 oa reading mm x 1 (a) Calculate the void ratio corresponding to each pressure increment, () Plot e-log p curve and find the compression index. ute the values of coefficient of compressibility and coefficient of volume change, for () Compt 200 kN/m? ; and 200 to 400 kN/m?. the increment of pressure from 100 to Solution. Final m.c. 0.29 Final void ratio 4p = WG = 0.89 x 2.77 = 1.08 Since consolidometer gives AH, and we have to work out ¢ (or Ae first), we use Eq. (9.10), as ‘ete AH ay ee or de= (1 +09) Initial height of specimen = 20 mm : Final height of specimen = 20 ~ 6.66* *[i.e. (766 - 100 1041 = 13.34 mm. a Usi . cued Speen nu and (i.e. at the end of the test), we can find a general relation : , which will hold good for all incremental pressure intervals. H,=13.34mm and e,= 1.08 AH = i334 (1 + 1.08) mm = 0.156 AH (where AH is in mm) as shown in column (7) of Table 9.2. Ans. e values are then coniputedoo Table 9.2 251 ee Dial gauge, wt) Wena reading mm * 10" inmm HWin'rmm!! |" becoasean Ta | $0186 xc01.(4) | (Sraih Trebt beitomy (3) (4) se | a © 259 20.00 | 9 OW 955 Oia 41 ()0.404 499 oe 16.01, eee 2 0: . 136 14.68 ee 8 o21 76 ous. 13.32 i ce a 9 (-)0.204 89s (4) 1.33 12.91 766 13.34 (0.207 table 9.2 are plotted o fgg eee ofe and p from table 9. na Semi-log pay : (QyValues ore gp, 2s shown in Fig. 99, PaPer, So as to obtain a graph yeene an peo T 0 22 For, p= 100, e= 1.496 1 For. p= 200, e 289 24 + Ae = 1.496 — 1.289 | rm S109 p= & log 200— 10g 100 19) : =—0207 0207 logjo-200. tog,.2 18) MAU 0910 OD ho t 17] = 0.688 a g 16 245 B14 3 743 1.2) fiber ila 1 — 03] ts 08) N. 0 10 20 50, 100 200 400 800 1000 Pin kN/m? (log) Fig. 9.9, Plot of e and log p tor example 9.3 (Table 9.2). Compression index C,, from this plot is obtained, as the slope of the straight line portion of curve, : : 1496-1289 _ ee Choosing any two points on this straight line, we get this slope = sr apo" = 5: 10810 F500 100 Hence, co pression index = C, = 0.688 Ans. © Coe, Vm? : f compressibility (a,). a, for increment of pressure between 100 to 200 kN/m’ Gaede. a wy, = = 20741 AP Py ~ PoSOIL MECHANICS AND Fou ATION 252 1,496 -1.289 _ 0.207 _ 9 97x 10-9 mean, i =g00-100 ~ 100 s. or low ; _. 7 where é, is the first void ratio betwe increment stages i.e. void ratio gs” b¥o of 100 kN/m? = 1.496, Tes modulus of volume change for pressure increm 200 kN/m? Mt etree -3 ‘ = 207TX10™ _ 9,83 x 10-8 mY/KN = 0.88 x 10 as = 741496 AN. An, «a, for increment of pressure between 200 to 400 kN/m? Similarly, £9 — 41 “ Pi- Po where py = 200 kN/m? and p, = 400 kN/m2 07 200 Similarly, the modulus of volume change for pressure increment between 209 to 400 kgs 4%, _ 1.06x10% : % - Thep 141.289 (9 = void ratio corresponding to py of 200 kNin? = 1 1.46 x 10% mY/KN. Ans. Example 9.4.4 uniform load of 145 kN /m? is distributed over a large area ofthe sufae of the ground. The sub-soil consists of a bed of dense sand, containing two strata of day, xh 3 m thick. The top of the upper stratum is 6 m below ground and. of the lower 21 m bets ground. The compression index for both layers is 0.35, the water content is 34%, and spetie gravity of soil grains 2.75. The sand weighs 20 kN/m* and is completely submerged. Conpit the total settlement under the load. Solution. The given soil conditions are shown in Fig. 9.10. = 1.06 x 10% m%KN. Ans, m, 1.45 kglom? ttt Sand Y= Yoat = 20 KNim> Completely submerged 21m 4)270 Using Eqn: (9.32), we have ‘To determine typ above, we should first determine C, a or ‘SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINe ia y Cy or 0.196 = GG «too s follows : o AH=m,.dp Hy la. (9.1) 1.73 em = m, x 62.5 “Xx (6 x 100 em) i m’ 1B» 4 m2 2 28 yan = 2.47 104 mi ™,* §2.5x500 ™ Further using Eq. (9.30), K=C, .m, «jy we have or K=8.5 x 10% ems; giv, 2 kN 10 ML 4) By 9.81 > 3.5 x 1010 > = C, x (2.47 x 10 ) in” mn 10 £__8.6x10 msec = 1.44 x 10-7 m%see ¥" 2.47% 10"! x 9.81 Substituting this value of C, in (i) above, we get or 144x107? m*/sec , .196 = ons (6m)? ° gg = ES soe = 3.403 x 107 see 1.44 x10 _ 3.403 x 107 = Soxamny days = 398.84 days. Ans. mple 9.6. Find the time required for 50% consolidation in a soil stratum, 9 m thick with ious strata on top and bottom. Also determine the coefficient of consolidation given that K = 10 ml sec ;e9 = 1.5, a, = 0.003 m?/kN, Time factor = 0.2. . H_9 Solution. d=5e aaa as it is draining at both ends = 4.5 m C,=?, T,=0.2, K= 10 m/sec. 5, a,=8 x 10% m”kN Using Eq. (9.32), wehave T,=—¢t 0.2 or t= too = G (4.5 my? oli) To determine C,, we have K=C,.m,.1,. (Bq. 9.30) ay +e where m, = (from Eq. 9.2) =3x193 ™ kN 1 ee 3 ie “3 1.2 x 10% m/kN 2 10 m/sec = C, x (22% 19-3 B kN a ay) ©9815GOMPRESSION AND CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS 27 107° Hence, c, Taxi0-Pxogi MUsee = 8.49 x 10 msec ., 2 Now from(@, tsp = G45 mj? = 02 ___ 00" yoy a ‘0 m’ 8.49 x 10-5 — 0.2.x 4.5? x 108 = 49 Secs = 552 days. Ans. Example 9.7. A soil of specific gravity 2.65 has a moisture content of 18% when fully saturated. 1.9 cm thick sample of this soil tested in a consolidometer shows a compression of 0,050 em when the load is increased from 40 kN /sq m to 80 kN/sq m. Compute the compres- sion index of the soil. Solution. G=265, w=0.18 S = 1 (fully saturated) w.G n e= S = 0.18 x 2.65 bs e¢ = 0.477. Now, compression AH = 0.050 cm. Hy = Thickness of sample = 1.9 cm. . 4H be Now, using i a Tra’ we get 0.050 _ Ae 1.477 x 0.050 “To *Tsoai7 6 MRT 70.0389 Now, use Bq.: Ae = C, logy, 20*4? Po where p, = 40 kN/m? Ap = 80 — 40 = 40 kN/m? 40440 40 3 2.0389 _ 9 199 log 19 2 0.0389 = C, logy, C,logy2 or C, Henge, C, = 0.129. Ans. \ pam 9.8. The loading period for a building extended from July 1987 to July 1989. In uly 1992, the average measured settlement was found to be 113 mm. It is known that the ultimate settlement will be about 360 mm. Estimate the settlement in July 1997. Assume double drainage to occur. Solution. When loading is applied over a certain period of time, then all time calculations are done by assuming the middle of the construction period as datum. Thus, in this problem, the building was constructed between July 1987 to July 1989. Hence, the datum would be July 1988, All further timings would be calculated from this datum. Hence, 113 mm settlement observed in July 1992 would be after a period of 4 years from this datum (July 1988). Settlement S, after ¢, (4 yrs) = 113 mm = 0.113 m Total settlement (S i.e. AH) = 360 mm = 0.360 m Settlement in July 1997, i.e. after 9 yrs from datum = S, at t, (9 yrs) =? , O13 _ 9 arg Now, U, = degree of settlement after t, (4 yrs) time = 9 569m, = 927: or i ‘SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEER 9 . S U, = degree of settlement after t, (9 yrs) time = 0360 = 2-778 8, Now, from Eq. (9.33), And r, =¢ U2 (for U < 0.60) T= Fos 14)? ff) x Ty, = G2.778 8.) i) (assuming U, to be $0.6; to be checked after computing 8.) _ 4, C, Cc, it . Ty = Geety Ta = ote k 2 Tt 7 gO _Ayrs yt Fert S,)? 9yts (0.314) _ f - 0814 01696 m 2.7788, \9 3 2.778 Let us check back that U, < 0.6 So Hence, the expected settlement after 9 yrs, ie. in July 1997 KY = 0.1696 m = 169.6 mm. Ans. ample 9.9.4 3 m thick clay and is underlain by an imp (which is less than 0.6, and hence our assumption at (A) is OK) layer beneath a building is overlain by @ permeable stratum ervious rock. The-coefficient of consolidation of the clay was found to be 0.025 cm?/ min. The final expected settlement for the layer is 8 cm. (© How much time will it take for 80% of total settlement to take place ? (i) Determine the time required for a settlement of 2.5 cm. (ii) What will be the settlement in 6 months ? Solution. 100% settlement = AH = 8 em 1, 0 0.008 0.031 0.071 0.126 0.196 0.287 0.403 0.567 0.848 (Engineering Services, 1984)Fr cowPRESSION AND CONSOLIDATION SETTLEMENTS, 278 80% settlement = 80% x 8 em = 6.4 em beon, = ? tise the general Bgn. (9.82) as : Cc, T= Geek where 7, for 80% settlement or consolidation = 0.567 (+ From the given values of U and T,, for U = 0.8 (80%)] max. length of drainage path full depth of clay, because it will drain only on one side, since impervious rock exists below the clay layer, and pervious soil exists above it =3m C, = 0.025 em*/min (given) Substituting the values, we got for 80% consolidation G, 0.025 em?/min Tygo)= Se (tg) or = 0.567 = IID, 5 00) = ge «eo (800cmy>* = tao = Time for 80% settlement (300)? x 0.567 = mi "ae = 1417.5 days = 3.88 yrs. Ans. (ii) Time required for 2.5 cm settlement (¢,) =? 4H, _ fl _ fa | nw. AH = T,, is a T, is time factor ort, = 216.3 days ‘Time required for 2.5 cm settlement = 216.3 days. Ans. (iii) The settlement in 6 months (i.e. 365/2 days or 182.5 days (say) Using ft, _ AM, we have 1417.5 days _ 64cm Sey 182.5days — Settlement (AH,) Settlement in 6 months (182.5 days) = AH, = 2.3m. Ans. Example 9.10. A building was to be constructed on a clay stratum. Preliminary analysis indicated a settlement of 50 mm in 6 years and an ultimate settlement of 250 mm. The aver- {ge increase of pressure in the clay stratum was 24 kN/m?, The following variations occurred from the assumptions used in the preliminary analysis : ® The loading period was 3 years, which was not considered in the preliminary analysis. i Borings indicated 20% more thickness for the clay stratum than originally assumed. (G) During construction, the water-table got lowered permanently by 1 metre. Estimate (©) The ultimate settlement a The settlement at the end of the loading period The settlement 2 years after completion of building (Civil Services, 2001) |
You might also like
Ecg353 Week 11
PDF
100% (1)
Ecg353 Week 11
83 pages
114
PDF
No ratings yet
114
22 pages
Piles 2019 - Assignment - MAK
PDF
No ratings yet
Piles 2019 - Assignment - MAK
5 pages
Compiled Infrastructure Assignment Kaddu
PDF
No ratings yet
Compiled Infrastructure Assignment Kaddu
25 pages
Geo Tech
PDF
No ratings yet
Geo Tech
4 pages
Field Identification of Soils
PDF
No ratings yet
Field Identification of Soils
3 pages
Foundation Engg Lab Mannual PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Foundation Engg Lab Mannual PDF
55 pages
Tutorial 2 Foundation
PDF
No ratings yet
Tutorial 2 Foundation
10 pages
Columns and Shear Walls Means Vertical Elements Form Work We Cane Remove After24 Hours But Slab Form Work Depend On Span Same Like This
PDF
No ratings yet
Columns and Shear Walls Means Vertical Elements Form Work We Cane Remove After24 Hours But Slab Form Work Depend On Span Same Like This
16 pages
GTE2 Unit 2 Assignment 2 2024 Answers
PDF
No ratings yet
GTE2 Unit 2 Assignment 2 2024 Answers
6 pages
Cve 654
PDF
No ratings yet
Cve 654
18 pages
HW 3
PDF
No ratings yet
HW 3
9 pages
5 One Dimensional Flow of Water Through Soils
PDF
No ratings yet
5 One Dimensional Flow of Water Through Soils
28 pages
6 Column Design
PDF
No ratings yet
6 Column Design
33 pages
CVE 309 Theory of structure LECTURE NOTE
PDF
100% (1)
CVE 309 Theory of structure LECTURE NOTE
43 pages
Timber or Wooden Formwork
PDF
No ratings yet
Timber or Wooden Formwork
11 pages
00 BOOK Foundation Analysis and Design (JE Bowles)
PDF
No ratings yet
00 BOOK Foundation Analysis and Design (JE Bowles)
1,241 pages
Comparative Study and Analysis of Unstiffened and Stiffened Plate With and Without Opening
PDF
100% (1)
Comparative Study and Analysis of Unstiffened and Stiffened Plate With and Without Opening
4 pages
A Road Embankment 10 M Wide at The Formation Level 60260bc4adf4ee28005ddae8
PDF
No ratings yet
A Road Embankment 10 M Wide at The Formation Level 60260bc4adf4ee28005ddae8
3 pages
1 Laboratory Compaction Test of Soil
PDF
No ratings yet
1 Laboratory Compaction Test of Soil
11 pages
Lab Report Fine Aggregate A13 PDF
PDF
No ratings yet
Lab Report Fine Aggregate A13 PDF
10 pages
CON4337A2TO131007BL Ch3 DynamicAnalysis
PDF
No ratings yet
CON4337A2TO131007BL Ch3 DynamicAnalysis
30 pages
Introduction To Structural Analysis-Part 1
PDF
No ratings yet
Introduction To Structural Analysis-Part 1
30 pages
P&B m1
PDF
No ratings yet
P&B m1
5 pages
Comodromos Randolph 2023 Improved Relationships For The Pile Base Response in Sandy Soils
PDF
100% (1)
Comodromos Randolph 2023 Improved Relationships For The Pile Base Response in Sandy Soils
12 pages
Chapter No-02-GT2
PDF
No ratings yet
Chapter No-02-GT2
5 pages
Advantages and Limitations of Flowchart
PDF
100% (1)
Advantages and Limitations of Flowchart
20 pages
Institute of Aeronautical Engineering
PDF
No ratings yet
Institute of Aeronautical Engineering
32 pages
VI Semester Soil and Rock Mechanics
PDF
0% (1)
VI Semester Soil and Rock Mechanics
5 pages
PART 5 WIND LOAD Example
PDF
No ratings yet
PART 5 WIND LOAD Example
20 pages
Problems
PDF
No ratings yet
Problems
4 pages
Earthquake-Induced Settlement: The Following Notation Is Used in This Chapter
PDF
No ratings yet
Earthquake-Induced Settlement: The Following Notation Is Used in This Chapter
27 pages
10CV54 Unit 07
PDF
No ratings yet
10CV54 Unit 07
17 pages
CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett
PDF
No ratings yet
CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett
45 pages
Utilization of Compact Discs in Concrete Masonry Unit (Hollow Block) Production
PDF
No ratings yet
Utilization of Compact Discs in Concrete Masonry Unit (Hollow Block) Production
7 pages
Chapter 5 - Bearing Capacity Analysis
PDF
No ratings yet
Chapter 5 - Bearing Capacity Analysis
11 pages
What Is Soil Bearing Capacity
PDF
100% (1)
What Is Soil Bearing Capacity
3 pages
Suitable of Eggshell Stabilized Lateric Soil
PDF
No ratings yet
Suitable of Eggshell Stabilized Lateric Soil
10 pages
CVE 530 FE Slope - Stability 3
PDF
No ratings yet
CVE 530 FE Slope - Stability 3
44 pages
Step by Step Procedure To Find Out The Volume of Earthwork Using Simpson's Rule
PDF
No ratings yet
Step by Step Procedure To Find Out The Volume of Earthwork Using Simpson's Rule
2 pages
Model Question Paper 2 - Geotechnical Engineering
PDF
No ratings yet
Model Question Paper 2 - Geotechnical Engineering
4 pages
1-Shear Strength of Soil
PDF
No ratings yet
1-Shear Strength of Soil
20 pages
Columns Short and Slender2
PDF
No ratings yet
Columns Short and Slender2
45 pages
07a60101 Geotechnical Engineering
PDF
No ratings yet
07a60101 Geotechnical Engineering
8 pages
BOQ-Single Storey House
PDF
No ratings yet
BOQ-Single Storey House
32 pages
Revision Questions
PDF
No ratings yet
Revision Questions
34 pages
RC I&II, SD &bridge Eng Model-Tutoarial Exam
PDF
No ratings yet
RC I&II, SD &bridge Eng Model-Tutoarial Exam
63 pages
CE 441 - Lec01 - CE22 - Yr2023 Types of Foundation
PDF
No ratings yet
CE 441 - Lec01 - CE22 - Yr2023 Types of Foundation
103 pages
Soil Mechanics Formula p1 To p3
PDF
No ratings yet
Soil Mechanics Formula p1 To p3
5 pages
Exploratory Boring Spacing & Depth
PDF
No ratings yet
Exploratory Boring Spacing & Depth
24 pages
Unit - I (Deflections of Determinate Structures) : Classical Methods Ce6501-Structural Analysis
PDF
No ratings yet
Unit - I (Deflections of Determinate Structures) : Classical Methods Ce6501-Structural Analysis
21 pages
CE 441 - Lec03 - BC of Shallow FDN in Clay V1
PDF
No ratings yet
CE 441 - Lec03 - BC of Shallow FDN in Clay V1
38 pages
Hydraulics Engineering Lec #1:: Specific Energy and Critical Depth
PDF
No ratings yet
Hydraulics Engineering Lec #1:: Specific Energy and Critical Depth
20 pages
CIVL354 Notes 1 Soil Compaction
PDF
No ratings yet
CIVL354 Notes 1 Soil Compaction
20 pages
40purl 1.SoilMechanics TYSExp. 2638
PDF
No ratings yet
40purl 1.SoilMechanics TYSExp. 2638
31 pages
Settlement Consolidation1
PDF
No ratings yet
Settlement Consolidation1
6 pages
U3 Consolidation Test
PDF
100% (2)
U3 Consolidation Test
23 pages
Consolidation Test
PDF
100% (1)
Consolidation Test
16 pages
Consolidation Test
PDF
No ratings yet
Consolidation Test
10 pages
Related titles
Click to expand Related Titles
Carousel Previous
Carousel Next
Ecg353 Week 11
PDF
Ecg353 Week 11
114
PDF
114
Piles 2019 - Assignment - MAK
PDF
Piles 2019 - Assignment - MAK
Compiled Infrastructure Assignment Kaddu
PDF
Compiled Infrastructure Assignment Kaddu
Geo Tech
PDF
Geo Tech
Field Identification of Soils
PDF
Field Identification of Soils
Foundation Engg Lab Mannual PDF
PDF
Foundation Engg Lab Mannual PDF
Tutorial 2 Foundation
PDF
Tutorial 2 Foundation
Columns and Shear Walls Means Vertical Elements Form Work We Cane Remove After24 Hours But Slab Form Work Depend On Span Same Like This
PDF
Columns and Shear Walls Means Vertical Elements Form Work We Cane Remove After24 Hours But Slab Form Work Depend On Span Same Like This
GTE2 Unit 2 Assignment 2 2024 Answers
PDF
GTE2 Unit 2 Assignment 2 2024 Answers
Cve 654
PDF
Cve 654
HW 3
PDF
HW 3
5 One Dimensional Flow of Water Through Soils
PDF
5 One Dimensional Flow of Water Through Soils
6 Column Design
PDF
6 Column Design
CVE 309 Theory of structure LECTURE NOTE
PDF
CVE 309 Theory of structure LECTURE NOTE
Timber or Wooden Formwork
PDF
Timber or Wooden Formwork
00 BOOK Foundation Analysis and Design (JE Bowles)
PDF
00 BOOK Foundation Analysis and Design (JE Bowles)
Comparative Study and Analysis of Unstiffened and Stiffened Plate With and Without Opening
PDF
Comparative Study and Analysis of Unstiffened and Stiffened Plate With and Without Opening
A Road Embankment 10 M Wide at The Formation Level 60260bc4adf4ee28005ddae8
PDF
A Road Embankment 10 M Wide at The Formation Level 60260bc4adf4ee28005ddae8
1 Laboratory Compaction Test of Soil
PDF
1 Laboratory Compaction Test of Soil
Lab Report Fine Aggregate A13 PDF
PDF
Lab Report Fine Aggregate A13 PDF
CON4337A2TO131007BL Ch3 DynamicAnalysis
PDF
CON4337A2TO131007BL Ch3 DynamicAnalysis
Introduction To Structural Analysis-Part 1
PDF
Introduction To Structural Analysis-Part 1
P&B m1
PDF
P&B m1
Comodromos Randolph 2023 Improved Relationships For The Pile Base Response in Sandy Soils
PDF
Comodromos Randolph 2023 Improved Relationships For The Pile Base Response in Sandy Soils
Chapter No-02-GT2
PDF
Chapter No-02-GT2
Advantages and Limitations of Flowchart
PDF
Advantages and Limitations of Flowchart
Institute of Aeronautical Engineering
PDF
Institute of Aeronautical Engineering
VI Semester Soil and Rock Mechanics
PDF
VI Semester Soil and Rock Mechanics
PART 5 WIND LOAD Example
PDF
PART 5 WIND LOAD Example
Problems
PDF
Problems
Earthquake-Induced Settlement: The Following Notation Is Used in This Chapter
PDF
Earthquake-Induced Settlement: The Following Notation Is Used in This Chapter
10CV54 Unit 07
PDF
10CV54 Unit 07
CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett
PDF
CH8 Consolidation SoilMech - Sett
Utilization of Compact Discs in Concrete Masonry Unit (Hollow Block) Production
PDF
Utilization of Compact Discs in Concrete Masonry Unit (Hollow Block) Production
Chapter 5 - Bearing Capacity Analysis
PDF
Chapter 5 - Bearing Capacity Analysis
What Is Soil Bearing Capacity
PDF
What Is Soil Bearing Capacity
Suitable of Eggshell Stabilized Lateric Soil
PDF
Suitable of Eggshell Stabilized Lateric Soil
CVE 530 FE Slope - Stability 3
PDF
CVE 530 FE Slope - Stability 3
Step by Step Procedure To Find Out The Volume of Earthwork Using Simpson's Rule
PDF
Step by Step Procedure To Find Out The Volume of Earthwork Using Simpson's Rule
Model Question Paper 2 - Geotechnical Engineering
PDF
Model Question Paper 2 - Geotechnical Engineering
1-Shear Strength of Soil
PDF
1-Shear Strength of Soil
Columns Short and Slender2
PDF
Columns Short and Slender2
07a60101 Geotechnical Engineering
PDF
07a60101 Geotechnical Engineering
BOQ-Single Storey House
PDF
BOQ-Single Storey House
Revision Questions
PDF
Revision Questions
RC I&II, SD &bridge Eng Model-Tutoarial Exam
PDF
RC I&II, SD &bridge Eng Model-Tutoarial Exam
CE 441 - Lec01 - CE22 - Yr2023 Types of Foundation
PDF
CE 441 - Lec01 - CE22 - Yr2023 Types of Foundation
Soil Mechanics Formula p1 To p3
PDF
Soil Mechanics Formula p1 To p3
Exploratory Boring Spacing & Depth
PDF
Exploratory Boring Spacing & Depth
Unit - I (Deflections of Determinate Structures) : Classical Methods Ce6501-Structural Analysis
PDF
Unit - I (Deflections of Determinate Structures) : Classical Methods Ce6501-Structural Analysis
CE 441 - Lec03 - BC of Shallow FDN in Clay V1
PDF
CE 441 - Lec03 - BC of Shallow FDN in Clay V1
Hydraulics Engineering Lec #1:: Specific Energy and Critical Depth
PDF
Hydraulics Engineering Lec #1:: Specific Energy and Critical Depth
CIVL354 Notes 1 Soil Compaction
PDF
CIVL354 Notes 1 Soil Compaction
40purl 1.SoilMechanics TYSExp. 2638
PDF
40purl 1.SoilMechanics TYSExp. 2638
Settlement Consolidation1
PDF
Settlement Consolidation1
U3 Consolidation Test
PDF
U3 Consolidation Test
Consolidation Test
PDF
Consolidation Test
Consolidation Test
PDF
Consolidation Test