ACCT101 Project Instructions (Final 21jun21)
ACCT101 Project Instructions (Final 21jun21)
Financial Accounting
Team Project
2021/2022 Term 1
Team project (20%) + Individual review of two presentations (2%) + Personal reflection (1%)
1. Objectives
The aims of this assessment are to enhance your understanding of useful financial accounting
information and the application of this information in practice. Therefore, you and your
teammates must:
• Assess the financial position and performance of your chosen company based on a
reasonable examination of the financial statements, notes to the accounts and other
disclosures; and
• Integrate non-accounting information (from other sources) with accounting
information to recommend and defend your advice.
In addition, you will engage in effective communication and use your leadership skills in a
team setting.
2. Company selection
Each team must choose one Singapore Exchange (SGX) Catalist or Mainboard merchandising
company to analyse and report on. Try to select a company that has reported in the last 12
months (reported a profit for the past two years and reports in Singapore dollars, if possible).
Please note, you must not contact your chosen company, its agents or competitors to obtain
research data, you must use ONLY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION. Under no
circumstances should you seek to use unpublished or private data.
As a team (20%):
1. Team Charter (1%)
2. Written report (8%)
3. Pre-recorded presentation (11%)
As an individual (3%):
4. Review of two pre-recorded presentations (2%)
5. Personal reflection on team project experience (1%)
All sections
AS A TEAM (Tx%)
Deliverable Due date Mode of delivery
17:00 (5pm) eLearn
Team charter (T1%)
Monday, 30 August Template provided
eLearn (PDF & DOCX +
Written report (8%) + 17:00 (5pm)
presentation file/s) + your
presentation files (T11%) Monday, 25 October
company’s Annual Report
AS AN INDIVIDUAL (Mx%)
Deliverable Due date Mode of delivery
Review two presentations 17:00 (5pm) eLearn
(M2%) Monday, 15 November Template provided
Personal reflection on 17:00 (5pm) eLearn system
team project (M1%) Wednesday, 17 November Template provided
Late submissions may be accepted on a case-by-case basis but, generally, if the deliverable is
submitted less than 24 hours late a 50% penalty will apply. Deliverables submitted more than
24 hours late will be awarded zero.
Where possible, relate any ratios used to actual happenings within the company, the industry
and the economy in general. However, to achieve better than a C grade in this area, you need
to comment on why a ratio group (profitability and risk) may have changed and how your
company’s ratios compare with industry benchmarks or competitor firms (where available)
to give your analysis a clearer context. You should also include any assumptions that you
make. Your workings should be presented as an appendix.
You can have a general advice section but you must also address TWO client’s needs
individually. You should aim to present a balanced view in line with your chosen client’s risk
profile and needs and provide supporting evidence from your analysis. In addition, whenever
you make a recommendation always word it with authority. You have conducted in-depth
research and carefully analysed all the options and this is the recommendation that your team
believes is the most appropriate in the current situation. Therefore, your recommendations
should always project an image of being the best possible solution for your chosen client.
Remember to also state any assumptions you make and identify any other information (if any)
that is not available that could strengthen the advice to your chosen clients.
Note: Teams may choose to integrate the analysis component with the advice to their clients.
When you use a confident and professional tone, your reader is more likely to agree and
accept the message you are conveying. Whenever possible, always use active rather than
passive constructions when writing your report. As the active voice is more direct, it is
generally shorter and clearer. Moreover, active voice portrays confidence in your analysis,
conclusions and recommendations.
It is important to be consistent with your spelling throughout your report. The UK and the US
spelling are often different. Examples include behaviour v behavior; organisation v
organization; analyse v analyze; colour v color. SMU, in its official documents, adopts the UK
spelling convention, however, you are free to choose. Whichever you choose, please be
consistent in adopting either the UK system or the US system, but do not use both.
In academic and business writing, we usually write the numbers 0 to 9 as zero, one, two, etc.
and the numbers 10 upwards as 10, 11, 12, 13, etc., although there are variations.
Language to avoid – you should refrain from using jargon, slang, vague or emotive language
in your report, and never use language that is discriminatory, offensive or culturally
insensitive. Although it is important to convey strength and confidence in your report, you
must avoid coming across as being overly confident, condescending or arrogant.
Refer to Annex 1 for the marking rubric for the written report deliverable.
You can use any presentation software that you like such as handwriting animation,
whiteboard animation, etc. to add that ‘creative touch’. However, you cannot create your
entire presentation using PowToon or similar video editing software.
The final grade awarded for your team’s presentation will be based in part on the reviews
your team receives from your classmates (see 3d below and Annex 3).
1. Oral (with video) presentation of the major findings from your analysis and the advice
to your clients. The presentation may be supported by static media (such as
PowerPoint slides, digital whiteboard, animation production software, etc.). Teams
are encouraged to be imaginative and resourceful in their delivery (weight 75%); and
Refer to Annex 2 for the marking rubric for the pre-recorded presentation deliverable.
irrelevant material.
irrelevant material. material.
Well-reasoned and Well-reasoned Shows some measured
Adequately reasoned.
reflective independent independent opinions. opinions but largely draws Unable to identify even
Identifies most
opinions. Identifies all Identifies all stakeholder on knowledge from the obvious stakeholder
Professional stakeholder issues and
stakeholder issues and issues and recognises textbook or other issues. Unfocused
advice given recognises common
explains complex complex common sources. thought processes and/or
(35%) interrelationships.
interrelationships. interrelationships. Identifies only obvious limited responses.
Assesses the situation
Assesses the situation Assesses the situation stakeholder issues with no
appropriately.
comprehensively. thoroughly. interrelationships.
Conclusion Concise and highly
Concise and persuasive Concise but doubts remain Weak and unconvincing Missing
(5%) persuasive
High quality references, Good quality references, Mostly good quality Incomplete or poor-
References
complete and complete and references, complete and quality references. Poor Missing
(5%)
appropriately formatted. appropriately formatted. appropriately formatted. citation technique.
A very pleasing style.
Flow and A pleasing and engaging Satisfactory construction. Uninspiring content. Poorly articulated or
Worth reading for its
accuracy style. Mostly accurate with no Numerous inaccuracies inappropriate professional
written expression alone.
(10%) Highly accurate. major errors. but no major errors. language. Major errors.
Totally error free.
pauses (e.g., ah, um). All Few irrelevant vocalised more obvious. Most team distracting. Few team
understanding. Team
team members are pauses. All team members members are articulate. members are articulate.
members are not very
articulate. Language and are articulate. Language Language and tone are Language and/or tone are
articulate. Language and
tone are professional. and tone are professional. professional. sometimes not professional.
tone are not professional.
Presentation lacks
An exceptional A high-quality presentation. A clearly competent Presentation competent
competence and care.
presentation. presentation. only in parts.
A short reflection or other comments (good and not so good) about your personal team
experience (four or five sentences, but more if you want to share).
Penalties
A majority of with no is the minimum acceptable rating. If your teammates rate you
below this, then the following penalty will be applied to you personally, and your written team
report score will be reduced accordingly.
50% 50%
Benefit of the doubt
Majority +1 (n > 0)
n +n +1
Majority but no 5% penalty
Name Signature
Remember failure to rate your teammates will result in a 20% penalty being applied to you
personally, and your written team report score will be reduced accordingly.