Ecological Companies

PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC ECOLOGICAL COMPANIES
INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS

SELF-ASSESSMENT
DEADLINE 1st OF FEBRUARY
SCORING
Each group fills out the self-assessment for their chosen topic. Students tick the relevant
boxes in the ‘done’ column and score themselves. Afterwards, the teacher scores the students
and decided which group are nominated for a Certificate of Excellence.
Please only fill out your first names and upload your self-assessment to Weebly in a separate
folder/separate tab.
Fill in first names of students
Name of the school PAWAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, CHANDIVALI
Tanisi
Group leader
Kaavya
Student 1
Saiesh
Student 2
Aarya
Student 3
-
Student 4
10
Checklist Max. Criteria Done? Student Score Teacher Score
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly Y 5

layout presented
- Research is divided into different

parts
- All documents are visible
- Multiple features of Weebly have

been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and Y 5

introduction attractive written/video introduction
- A group photo/camera shot is

added
- Personal information is shared

(hobbies, etc.)
- In case the group used a YouTube

video, ‘Eumind’ is included in the
title
Research 10p - Sufficient people were interviewed Y 10

methods
- A good summary of the answers
of the interviews is included (200-
300 words per interview)
Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the Y 30

investigations research?
- Did you answer all the questions?
SDG activity 5p - Was the SDG activity carried out? Y 5
- How well was the SDG activity

carried out?
11
Points Y/N
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main Y 5

research question?
- How good is the quality of the

conclusion?
Documentation 5p - Has the research been Y 5

documented in pictures/videos?
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is Y 10

communication added
 Pictures of Zoom/WhatsApp
 Reflection on Video
Conferences is added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the Y, (not 9

similarities and differences between satisfact
the schools? ory)
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the Y 15

reflection?
- Has each student written an

individual reflection?
Total 100p 99
12
Do you have any suggestions for the Eumind projects?
Please explain your ideas concisely.
It would be ideal if in the next project more regular checks between the
counterparts could be conducted in order to keep a track of each other’s
processes and to facilitate better communication.
13
SELF-ASSESSMENT
SCORING
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

layout presented
- Research is divided into 4 parts
- All documents are visible in the

article

been used
Group 5p - The group has a short and


added

(hobbies, etc.)

title
Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed

methods
- The investigation among students
was carried out

of each interview is included (200-
words per interview)
- Some (parts of) answers are video

recorded
- Subtitles are added
10
Points Y/N
Interviews 25p - How good is the quality of the

research?
- Has your group given an

explanation of the units of energy
and power in your Weebly and used
them correctly?
Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main

research question?

conclusion?
Documentation 10p - Has the research been

 Pictures: minimum 6
 Videos: no more than 3
minutes
- Are graphs clearly presented?
Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is

communication added
Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the

similarities and differences between
the organizations?
Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the

reflection?

Total 100p
11
12
PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC SAVING FOOD

SELF-ASSESSMENT
SCORING
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
14
Points Y/N
ttractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

layout presented

parts
- All documents are visible

been used


added

(hobbies, etc.)

title

methods

recorded
- Did you answer all the questions?
15
Points Y/N
Interviews and 25p - How good is the quality of the


of the interviews is included (200-
- All the worksheets were filled out

and added to Weebly
- A good summary of the results of

the diaries is included

research question?

conclusion?

minutes

communication added

the countries?

reflection?

Total 100p
Awareness Bonus - Was the awareness activity carried
activity 5p out?
16
17
PROJECT SCENARIO
GOGREEN
SUBTOPIC WASTE MANAGEMENT

SELF-ASSESSMENT
SCORING
Name of the school
Group leader
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Student 4
11
Points Y/N
Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

layout presented

parts
- All documents are visible in the

article

been used


added

(hobbies, etc.)

title

methods
- The investigation among students
was carried out

of each interview is included (200-

recorded
12
Points Y/N
Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the

- Have you answered all of the

questions?
- Have you thought of at least 2

methods to reduce the amount of
rubbish in school?

research question?

conclusion?

minutes
- Are graphs clearly presented?

communication added

the schools?

reflection?

Total 100p
Awareness Bonus - Have you carried out the
activity 5p awareness activity?
13
14

Ecological Companies

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ecological Companies

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ecological Companies

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT SCENARIO

INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS

Fill in first names of students

Name of the school PAWAR PUBLIC SCHOOL, CHANDIVALI

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly Y 5

- Research is divided into different

- All documents are visible

- Multiple features of Weebly have

Group 5p - The group has a short and Y 5

- A group photo/camera shot is

- Personal information is shared

- In case the group used a YouTube

Research 10p - Sufficient people were interviewed Y 10

Interviews and 30p - How good is the quality of the Y 30

- Did you answer all the questions?

SDG activity 5p - Was the SDG activity carried out? Y 5

- How well was the SDG activity

Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main Y 5

- How good is the quality of the

Documentation 5p - Has the research been Y 5

Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is Y 10

Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the Y, (not 9

Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the Y 15

- Has each student written an

Fill in first names of students

Name of the school

Attractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

- Research is divided into 4 parts

- All documents are visible in the

- Multiple features of Weebly have

Group 5p - The group has a short and

- A group photo/camera shot is

- Personal information is shared

- In case the group used a YouTube

Research 15p - Sufficient people were interviewed

- A good summary of the answers

- Some (parts of) answers are video

- Subtitles are added

Interviews 25p - How good is the quality of the

- Has your group given an

Conclusion 5p - Is there a clear answer to the main

- How good is the quality of the

Documentation 10p - Has the research been

- Are graphs clearly presented?

Evidence of 10p - Evidence of communication is

Comparison 10p - Is there a good comparison on the

Reflection 15p - How good is the quality of the

- Has each student written an

INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS

Fill in first names of students

Name of the school

ttractive 5p - Information is readable and clearly

- Research is divided into different

- All documents are visible

- Multiple features of Weebly have

Group 5p - The group has a short and

- A group photo/camera shot is

- Personal information is shared

- In case the group used a YouTube