Week 3 - 4 Basic Rules Rules of TV

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

BASIC RULES OF TELEVISION

The newspapers are printed for the eye; the TV news story is presented for both eye and ear;
while radio news is meant to appeal to the ear. The golden rule for TV news is: write like you
talk, not like you write. To communicate information it must speak in simple language most
viewers would understand. The following rules must be remembered in writing the news for
television.
1. Clarity
The first rule of TV news is that the story must be clear at once. Unlike the reader, the viewer
has no second chance to go over the material. TV news is written on the wind-here for the
instant, gone the next moment. A viewer left wondering; about the meaning of what has been
said at the beginning of a sentence will probably be too distracted to comprehend what is being
said at the end of it. Just as the person who writes science articles for a popular magazine must
be able to translate complicated scientific jargon into the general reader's language, the writer of
TV news must be able to make complicated stories simple. In short, understanding must be
immediate in the TV News Bulletin. The golden rule to follow is "never underestimate the
viewers' intelligence or over-estimate their knowledge".

2. Brevity
Clarity comes not only from writing simple sentences but also from writing short ones. Long
sentences cannot be read easily by the newscaster, and a viewer has a hard time following them.
Every sentence that you write for broadcast should be short, simple and easy to understand. The
average acceptable number of words per sentence in a TV copy is 13 to 14. TV news has been
described as a headlines service. It is intended to give the viewer only an outline of the event. In
short, there are more words in a traffic accident news item in a newspaper than there are in the
entire news bulletin.
Formula (ELF) has been devised after an analysis of numerous broadcast scripts. This formula,
simply put, goes like this: in any sentence, count each syllable above one per word. Take a
second look at any sentence scoring above 20. It may be perfectly clear, but chances are it can be
improved by trimming adjectives or adverbs, extracting clauses or simply dividing into two
sentences.
A one-syllable word is not counted: hat, check, give
A two-syllable word counts one: bowler, grabbing, hostess
A three-syllable word counts two: radio, distributes, beautiful, misery
A four-syllable word counts three: democracy, implausible, conscientious and so forth.

Excess syllables represent waste. A one-syllable word is always better than a two-syllable word,
if it says what you want to say. And a two-syllable word is much better than a four-syllable word
when it serves the purpose. Often you can save time by using:
FIRST for 'initial'
BEAT for 'defeat'
BUY for 'purchase'
END for 'conclude'
SURE for 'certain'
TRY for 'attempt'
URGE for 'persuade'
One syllable words are often either familiar verbs, pronouns, function words (the "glue"
words which hold content words together), or concrete nouns. Long words such as
capitalism, totalitarianism, communication, psychotherapy often communicate abstract
ideas. In writing news for TV, we cannot always escape long words. To get a difficult
idea across, we should do it in as simple a manner as possible.

3. Conversational
TV news writers use everyday words: the language of conversation. TV journalists use a
vocabulary that corresponds to the one used in daily conversation. Words used in everyday
speech ought to be included when drafting news for television. Take this story written @ per
newspaper style:
"The Secretary General of the Red Cross Society of Kenya stated in a press conference today
that many Christmas toys can inflict injury upon unsuspecting youngsters". That is not exactly
conversational. Instead, a TV journalist would write:
"A Red Cross official warns that many Christmas toys can be dangerous for kids".
The following is the partial list of words that are generally too formal for TV news, with
conversational alternatives:
Formal Conversational
Slate Schedule
Passed away Died
Bar Prevent
Reside Live
Residence Home
Nab Catch
Altercation Argument
prior to before
indisposed sick, ill

Most of the words in the "formal" column also take longer to say, thereby wasting time. On the
other hand, conversational words are short, commonly-used words and therefore communicate
easily. 'Words that we might succeed in deciphering in a newspaper or book are much more
difficult to comprehend when we listen to them.

Time Reference-Present Tense


The element of immediacy is one of the biggest assets of the TV medium in reporting news.
Every effort should be made to include up-to-date reports and to write copy in a manner that
sounds fresh and timely. With this in view, the present tense is encouraged.
For example:
Police were searching for clue. (Unacceptable)
Police are searching for clues. (Acceptable)
The present tense is the most engaging tense in the language. It indicates that the action is still
going on; it conveys currency of the news. It is more appropriate to phrase a sentence as, "There
is a huge fire in the old city", than, "there was a huge fire in the old city".
The dynamic nature of news is better carried in copy that incorporates the present tense. Here
are a few illustrative sentences:
Iraq announces that it accepts the UN proposal for a cease fire in West Asia.
Or
The Chinese have test-fired another hydrogen bomb.
There are many situations, nevertheless, where the present tense does not work: for example
The bridge collapses
Or
Two people are being shot (both are unacceptable)
Actions that belong to moments in the recent past cannot be forcibly dragged into the present -
that bridge is not collapsing now.
However, (the present perfect tense) maintains an air of immediacy while describing actions that
have ended.
The bridge has collapsed
Two people have been shot (both are acceptable)
The present perfect is less dated than the past tense and is used in situations in which the present
tense is unacceptable:
A constable has been arrested for impersonating as a magistrate.
There can be situations in which neither the present nor the present perfect tense are acceptable:
i) Few people have shown up at the meeting, so it broke up early
Or
ii) Two people have been shot earlier today (both are unacceptable even when
written in present perfect tense)
In these situations, it is necessary to fall back on the past tense.
i) Few people showed up at the meeting, so it broke up early
Or
ii) Two people were shot earlier today. (Both are acceptable)
Do not say 'today' when the story broke yesterday. Such practice can prove embarrassing. Be
resourceful. Update the story. Move it into the present by highlighting a new fact. In such a
situation, it is perfectly proper to conceal the time in case the time element is not of consequence.
For example, if it is mid-afternoon and you are using a statement that the British Prime Minister
made the preceding night, it is not necessary to say:
Last night the British Prime Minister, Liz Truss, issued a strong statement condemning terrorist
violence in Punjab and Kashmir.
What is newsworthy here is the British Prime Minister's condemnation of terrorism and not so
much the time element. So, the sentence should read as:
British Prime Minister John Major has condemned terrorist violence in Punjab and Kashmir.
The time element can be mentioned later in the story when more details are mentioned.
Active Voice
Avoid the passive voice; it is the voice in which the subject is acted upon. Use instead the active
voice where the subject acts upon the object.
Passive voice: An airliner was hit by a private plane.
Active voice: A private plane crashed into an airliner.
Active voice is clearer, packs more punch and uses fewer words.
Weak: The policeman suddenly took away the gun.
Better: The policeman snatched the gun.
It is important to keep the action in the verb. The active voice (the subject of the sentence does
the acting) is stronger than the passive voice (the subject of the sentence is being acted upon).
Weak: The building was destroyed by the fire.
Better: The fire destroyed the building.

You might also like