219501

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 20

The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S.

Department of Justice and prepared the following final report:

Document Title: Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of


Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratory
Evidence

Author: David M. Northrop, Eric C. Person, Lori Knops

Document No.: 219501

Date Received: February 2011

Award Number: 2003-LT-BX-K004

This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice.
To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally-
funded grant final report available electronically in addition to
traditional paper copies.

Opinions or points of view expressed are those


of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect
the official position or policies of the U.S.
Department of Justice.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

FINAL REPORT ABSTRACT


Forensic Analysis of Evidence from
Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories

Submitted to
National Institute of Justice

By
Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division

December 12, 2005

Project Title: Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of Clandestine Methamphetamine


Laboratory Evidence

Project Subtitle: Practical Application of CE Techniques to the analysis of samples from


Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories

Authors: Dr. David M. Northrop – Forensic Scientist


Dr. Eric C. Person – Forensic Scientist
Ms. Lori Knops – Forensic Scientist

Period: July 1, 2003 to March 31, 2006


Budget Amount: $316,222
Grant Number: 2003-LT-BX-K004
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratory Evidence

Three goals were outlined for this project:


1) To develop capillary electrophoresis (CE) methods that can be used to assist in the
identification of inorganic chemical species from various methamphetamine
manufacturing methods;
2) To develop a better understanding of methamphetamine manufacturing methods and the
chemistry of popular and emerging reactions, so as to improve the evaluation of samples
collected from illicit manufacturing facilities;
3) To provide training to forensic chemistry analysts, clandestine laboratory crime scene
responders, and user agencies on what to look for when handling laboratories associated
with popular and newly emerging methamphetamine manufacturing trends.

Goal 1 was achieved with the development of a dynamic coating CE method using CElixirOATM
8.2 to separate inorganic anions including: acetate, azide, bromide, carbonate, chlorate, chloride,
fluoride, hypophosphate, iodide, nitrate, nitrite, perchlorate, phosphate, phosphite, sulfate,
sulfite, and thiocyanate. The developed method is capable of detecting these anions down to
between 10 and 30 ppm and with a percent relative standard deviation for normalized migration
times of less than 0.1%. This method was used to differentiate samples from various
methamphetamine manufacturing methods for the purpose of identifying the manufacturing
process that was utilized.

Goal 2 was accomplished in three primary ways. First, the phosphorus chemistry in the
hydriodic acid method of methamphetamine manufacture was elucidated using the CE anion
method (developed in Goal 1) and GC/MS analysis for organic species. Equations were
developed to allow the chemist to predict starting materials based on the analysis of post-reaction
materials. Using predicted, optimized reaction stoichiometry, methamphetamine was
manufactured in less than 15 minutes. Second, methamphetamine was manufactured in a “One-
Pot” environment using the in-situ generation of ammonia from fertilizer and lye combined with
an alkali metal and pseudoephedrine in a single reaction vessel. Third, pseudoephedrine was
demonstrated to be recoverable from multi-ingredient, liquid, and/or softgel over-the-counter
(OTC) medications using commonly available extraction methods. These same OTC
medications were shown to be converted to methamphetamine using the “One-Pot” method of
manufacture.

Goal 3 included the publication of six papers, production of eight training videos, and oral
presentations of results at twenty meetings with forensic scientists, clandestine laboratory
responders, law enforcement officials, community leaders, legislators and user agency personnel.
In addition, the CE methods have been successfully implemented in other crime laboratories
within the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

FINAL REPORT SUMMARY


Forensic Analysis of Evidence from
Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories

Submitted to
National Institute of Justice

By
Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division

December 12, 2005

Project Title: Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of Clandestine Methamphetamine


Laboratory Evidence

Project Subtitle: Practical Application of CE Techniques to the analysis of samples from


Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratories

Authors: Dr. David M. Northrop – Forensic Scientist


Dr. Eric C. Person – Forensic Scientist
Ms. Lori Knops – Forensic Scientist

Period: July 1, 2003 to March 31, 2006


Budget Amount: $316,222
Grant Number: 2003-LT-BX-K004
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratory Evidence

Three goals were outlined for this project:


1) To develop capillary electrophoresis methods that can be used to assist in the identification
of inorganic chemical species from various methamphetamine manufacturing methods;
2) To develop a better understanding of methamphetamine manufacturing methods and the
chemistry of popular and emerging reactions, so as to improve the evaluation of samples
collected from illicit manufacturing facilities;
3) To provide training to forensic chemistry analysts, clandestine laboratory crime scene
responders, and user agencies on what to look for when handling laboratories associated
with popular and newly emerging methamphetamine manufacturing trends.

This summary details the ways in which these goals were accomplished.

Goal 1 – Capillary Electrophoresis Methods for Inorganic Ion Analysis of Samples from
Clandestinely Manufactured Methamphetamine

Flexible inorganic ion analysis techniques can be used to provide valuable data in the analysis of
samples from clandestine methamphetamine manufacturing sites. Variations within a specific
class of manufacturing methods can be difficult to differentiate without evaluating all of the
chemical species present. Two primary achievements in using capillary electrophoresis for this
purpose were accomplished.
1) Several capillary electrophoresis (CE) anion methods were evaluated for their suitability in
the analysis of clandestine laboratory samples 1-4. One specific goal was to find an
analytical approach for identifying the various phosphorus oxyacids (hypophosphorous
acid, phosphorous acid and phosphoric acid). The best results were obtained using
modifications made to a commercially available dynamic coating CE anion analysis kit,
CElixirOATM 8.2 (Microsolv Technology Corp, Longbranch, NJ). To achieve the desired
results, modifications were made to this kit including lowering the run temperature to 15°C
and utilizing an acid flush of the column between runs. These modifications succeeded in
creating a method that provides robust, reproducible results for the analysis a number of
forensically significant anions. The anions that were resolved using this method included:
acetate, azide, bromide, carbonate, chlorate, chloride, fluoride, hypophosphate, iodide,
nitrate, nitrite, perchlorate, phosphate, phosphite, sulfate, sulfite, and thiocyanate. The
developed method is capable of detecting these anions down to between 10 and 30 ppm
and with a percent relative standard deviation for normalized migration times of less than
0.1%. A separation of 100 ppm standards is shown in Exhibit 1. This concentration range
is useful for the analysis of samples from clandestine laboratories when they are diluted
appropriately. Lowering the temperature to 15°C improved resolution for some closely
migrating species (e.g. iodide and chloride). While the acid flush modification to the
method alleviated a problem with severe phosphate peak tailing that had been observed
initially. The peak tailing is believed to be from adsorption of phosphate in the system.
The acid flush between runs removes any adsorbed materials. The recommended analysis
parameters are shown in Exhibit 2. Anion analysis for iodide, hypophosphite, phosphite,
and phosphate can be used to assist in the determination of which phosphorus – iodine
methamphetamine manufacturing method was used. This method was successfully
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

employed to evaluate samples from the four phosphorus – iodine methamphetamine


manufacturing methods described below in Goal 2. Following validation of the method, it
was implemented successfully in two other laboratories (within the Washington State
Patrol Crime Laboratory Division – WSP CLD) where clandestine laboratory evidence is
evaluated. These labs have begun using the method in routine casework. Samples from
adjudicated cases were provided to the WSP CLD Marysville Laboratory by the Greeley-
Weld County Forensic Laboratory in Greeley, Colorado. The samples from Colorado were
from methamphetamine labs suspected of using the hypophosphorous acid – iodine method
of manufacturing. CE anion analysis of these samples has been successful in identifying
anion species characteristic of this method of manufacture.

Exhibit 1 – CE Analysis of 100 ppm Anion Standards

The CE anion method developed during this project was also used to evaluate samples
from other methamphetamine manufacturing methods. The determination of sulfate and/or
nitrate can be useful in identifying what type of ammonium salt was used to generate
liquefied ammonia for the alkali metal – liquefied ammonia methamphetamine
manufacturing method.

In addition to the utility of this method for the analysis of samples from clandestine drug
manufacturing cases, the developed CE anion analysis method is being used in other areas
of forensic analysis within the WSP CLD including: explosives cases, poisoning cases and
other chemistry cases involving inorganic anions.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 2 – Recommended Instrument Conditions


Vial Summary
Position* Buffer Purpose
Vial 1 0.1 N HCl or 0.1 N HBr Preconditioning
Vial 2 CE Grade Water Preconditioning
Vial 3 CE Grade Water Preconditioning
Vial 4 CElixerOA 8.2 Solution A – Initiator Preconditioning
Vial 5 CElixerOA 8.2 Solution B – Accelerator Preconditioning
Vial 6 CElixerOA 8.2 Solution B – Accelerator Run Buffer
Vial 7 CElixerOA 8.2 Solution B – Accelerator Run Buffer
Vial 8 CE Grade Water Flush Waste
Vial 9 CE Grade Water Stacking Injection

Column Preconditioning Flushes


Inlet (Vial #) Outlet (Vial #) Time†
HCl or HBr (1) Waste (8) 30 seconds
Water (2) Waste (8) 30 seconds
Water (3) Waste (8) 30 seconds
Initiator (4) Waste (8) 90 seconds
Accelerator (5) Waste (8) 90 seconds
Initiator (4) Waste (8) 90 seconds
Accelerator (5) Waste (8) 120 seconds

Instrument Conditions
Cassette Temperature 15°C
Capillary 50 μM Inside diameter fused silica capillary, 80.5 cm actual length,
72 cm Effective length‡
Stacking Injection 50 mbar, 2 Seconds, sample vial to run buffer (7)
10 mbar, 2 Seconds, water (9) to run buffer (7)
Run Buffers Inlet vial (6), Outlet vial (7)
Run Voltage 30 kV, Negative polarity
Run Time 11 Minutes (approximately 22 minutes including preconditioning)
Detection Monitor at 233 nm, 20 nm bandwidth, no reference§

* Vial positions are included for subsequent reference, though the required buffers could be placed
in any location so long as the method is adjusted accordingly.
† The instrument’s standard flush pressure is used and will displace the volume of the capillary
from the injection vial to the detector in approximately 90 seconds.
‡ This column dimension is commercially available or can be cut from a spool of capillary at a
reduced cost. Capillary lengths of 64.5 cm were also found to provide acceptable results.
§ Other wavelengths may be useful for the detection of absorbing species, so it is recommended
that the entire spectrum be saved.

2) Existing commercial CE methods for the analysis of inorganic cations were evaluated for
their suitability in the analysis of clandestine laboratory samples. Two commercial CE
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

cations methods (from Agilent Technologies 5 and Waters Corporation 6) provide good
separation for ammonium, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium and lithium.
However, cations of iron, barium, zinc, nickel, and strontium tend to migrate in a very
narrow range close to the migration range of lithium. The addition of an organic modifier
(methanol or acetonitrile) to the CE run buffer of either commercial kit examined
improved the resolution of these cations listed above. Some organic cations (such as
methamphetamine, pseudoephedrine and ephedrine) are also resolved using these standard
commercial methods; however, the addition of the organic modifier did not improve
resolution of any of the organic amines examined. An example of the types of data
obtained is shown in Exhibit 3. Additional research is still needed to optimize these
methods; however, valuable information about the cationic species in clandestine
methamphetamine manufacturing samples is readily obtained using the current state of
technology. Cation analysis was demonstrated to be useful in providing data to confirm
the type of alkali metal and presence of ammonia in the alkali metal – liquefied ammonia
method of methamphetamine manufacture.

Exhibit 3 – CE cation analysis


1

A 0 Pseudoephedrine
-1 Methamphetamine
Ephedrine
mAU

-2
-3
-4
-5
NH4+ Na+ Ca2+ Mg2+ Li+
-6
K+
-7

2 3 4 5 6
-15

B -16
Zn+ Ni2+
NH4+ Methamphetamine
mAU

-17
Pseudoephedrine
K+ Ephedrine
-18
Na+
Ca2+
-19 Li+ Ba2+
Sr2+
-20
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5
0
C -2.5 Zn+
Fe2+
mAU

-5

-7.5
Sr2+
NH4+ Na+ Methamphetamine Pseudoephedrine
K+ Ba2+Li+ Ni2+
Ca2+ Mg2+ Ephedrine
-15

-17.5
2 3 4 5 6 7
Time (minutes)

A – 100 millimolar standards, Capillary: 75 micron i.d., 64.5 centimeters long (56 centimeters to detection
window), Agilent cation buffer, no organic modifier, detection – diode array UV monitored at 200
nanometers, temperature – 25°C.
B – 100 millimolar standards, Capillary: 75 micron i.d., 64.5 centimeters long (56 centimeters to detection
window), Agilent cation buffer, 10% acetonitrile modifier, detection – diode array UV monitored at 200
nanometers, temperature – 20°C.
C – 100 millimolar standards (ammonium at 200 millimolar), Capillary: 75 micron i.d., 64.5 centimeters
long (56 centimeters to detection window), Waters IonSelectTM Low Mobility Cation Electrolyte, 10%
acetonitrile modifier, detection – diode array UV monitored at 240 nanometers with a 214 nanometer
reference, temperature – 25°C.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Goal 2 – Chemistry of Popular and Emerging Clandestine Methamphetamine


Manufacturing Methods

Three primary achievements were accomplished with regards to the chemistry of


methamphetamine manufacture.
1) A series of experiments were conducted to elucidate the chemical processes involved in the
popular hydriodic acid – phosphorus method7 of reducing pseudoephedrine (or ephedrine)
to methamphetamine. Four primary variations of this method were investigated to
determine what phosphorus species would be present in samples collected from these types
of reactions. The variations investigated included:
a. red phosphorus with iodine
b. phosphorous acid with iodine
c. hypophosphorus acid with iodine
d. phosphorus triiodide
All four phosphorus-containing reducing agents were found to successfully reduce
pseudoephedrine (or ephedrine) to methamphetamine. Samples from each of the
experiments were collected at sequential time points throughout each experiment. These
samples were analyzed using the CE anion analysis method developed in Goal 1 and
established gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS) methods. Exhibit 4 shows
an example of the data generated for a hypophosphorous acid / iodine reaction.

Exhibit 4 – CE and GC/MS data for Hypophosphorous Acid/Iodine Reaction


NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

The data from each of the reactions was used to confirm mechanistic pathways and show
the interconnections between all four variations. Exhibit 5 shows the relationships
between the various phosphorus containing reducing agents and the final product
phosphate.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 5 – Phosphorus-Containing Reducing Agent Oxidation Pathways

Red Phosphorus
POS 0

Hypophosphite Phosphorus triiodide


POS +1 POS +3

Phosphite
POS +3

Phosphate
POS +5

A graphical schematic of likely oxidation pathways for common phosphorus-containing reducing agents in the
presence of water and iodine. The oxidation state assigned to the phosphorus atom (POS) is shown below each
species, illustrating the reactions that include oxidation of the phosphorus atom.

The data also was used to develop a detailed set of equations to describe the processes.
Net reaction equations for the four reactions are shown in Exhibit 6.

Exhibit 6 – Net Reaction Equations


P4 + 6 H2O + 10 Pseudoephedrine* ⎯⎯→
3-
Red Phosphorus : HI
10 Methamphetamine + 4 PO 4 + 12 H +
2- 3-
Phosphorous Acid : H 3 PO 3 + Pseudoephedrine ⎯⎯→
HI
Methamphetamine + PO 4 + H +
- 3-
Hypophosphorous Acid : H 2 PO 2 + 2 Pseudoephedrine ⎯⎯→
HI
2 Methamphetamine + PO 4 + 2 H +
Phosphorus Triiodide : PI 3 + H 2 O + Pseudoephedrine → Methamphetamine + 3 I - + 6 H +
* Note Ephedrine can be substituted in the above equations for pseudoephedrine.

These equations show the appropriate stoichiometric balance of reactants for the efficient
manufacture of methamphetamine. Methamphetamine was manufactured in under 15
minutes using conditions that the equations predict to be optimal8, thus demonstrating that
methamphetamine manufacture can be done rapidly using these processes if the reaction
conditions are appropriately controlled. These equations can be used to calculate
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

relationships between the quantities of reactants used and the quantities of products
produced9. This allows the chemist to evaluate sample data to assist in the determination
of which manufacturing process was used. CE data obtained from case samples was
evaluated using the relationships described above. Exhibit 7 lists some of the conclusions
that can be determined from this data.

Exhibit 7 – CE anion analysis interpretation


CE Results Interpretation
Liquid Samples
hypophosphite • unreacted hypophosphorous acid
• hypophosphite salt
phosphite • unreacted phosphorous acid
• dissolved phosphite salt
phosphate • phosphoric acid
• diluted phosphoric acid
• dissolved phosphate salt
iodide and phosphate • May be from any methamphetamine manufacturing method
using iodine and a phosphorus-containing reducing agent†
iodide, phosphite and May be from the following methamphetamine manufacturing
phosphate methods where the quantity of reductant was insufficient to consume
all of the reducing agent:

• iodine and hypophosphorous acid


• iodine and phosphorous acid
• phosphorus triiodide

• iodine and red phosphorus reactions may exhibit trace


quantities of phosphite in some samples
(Quantitative analysis of the anions may be used to suggest ratios of
precursors)
iodide, phosphite and • May be from a methamphetamine manufacturing method
hypophosphite using iodine and hypophosphorous acid
ƒ prior to the addition of reductant
ƒ atypically low amount of iodine and reductant used
iodide and hypophosphite • Stabilized commercial hydriodic acid (small amounts of
hypophosphorous acid may be used as a stabilizing agent)

Phosphorus containing reducing agents included: Red phosphorus (presumably white phosphorus
also), hypophosphorous acid, phosphorous acid, and phosphorus triiodide.
Red Solid Samples – Aqueous Extracts
phosphate, phosphite, and • likely unused red phosphorus with oxyacids resulting from
hypophosphite air oxidation
iodide, phosphate, phosphite • likely used red phosphorus
and hypophosphite • confirmed with elemental analysis for phosphorus
• GC/MS may show methamphetamine and/or other organic
byproducts)
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

CE Results Interpretation
no significant phosphorous • red phosphorus with glues remaining on the surface
anions observed preventing oxidation (may show slow reaction rates as a
result, data not shown)
• freshly washed or extracted red phosphorus that has not had
time to oxidize
Other Anionic Species
Chloride ions • counter ion from precursor materials
• muriatic acid added to the reaction or used in a prior process
(e.g. from the precipitation of iodine from tincture)
Sulfate ions • counter ion from precursor material
• sulfuric acid added to the reaction or used in a prior process
(e.g. from the precipitation of iodine from tincture)
Carbonate ions • absorbed carbon dioxide (typical for highly basic pH
reaction materials – usually from the addition of NaOH)

2) Successful experiments were conducted that demonstrated the viability of a new variation
on the alkali metal – liquefied ammonia method of methamphetamine manufacture10. This
variation is termed the “‘One-Pot’ method of manufacture” because all of the reaction
materials are combined in a single reaction vessel. The variation involves the in-situ
generation of ammonia from an ammonium salt and sodium hydroxide11. The generated
ammonia is captured in a suitable organic solvent to which an alkali metal (e.g. sodium or
lithium) has been added. Ephedrine placed in the reaction vessel is converted to
methamphetamine in a single reaction step. The experiments were conducted
demonstrating that various ammonium salts (e.g. ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate
etc.) can be used with the “One-Pot” method, and that ephedrine does not need to be
purified prior to use in the experiment. Additional experiments also showed that other
alkali metals could be used as well. CE cation analyses of materials from these reactions
show high concentrations of sodium (from the sodium hydroxide) in addition to
ammonium and lithium. CE anion analysis will typically show the ammonium salt counter
ion (e.g. nitrate, sulfate, phosphate etc.) and any counter ions for pseudoephedrine and any
other tablet ingredients (e.g. chloride, sulfate, bromide, etc.).
3) Pseudoephedrine is a highly popular precursor for the manufacture of methamphetamine
and often is obtained from commercial over-the-counter (OTC) cold and/or allergy
preparations. Legislative restrictions on OTC pseudoephedrine preparations are being
implemented and vary from state to state12. Some pharmaceutical industry representatives
have insisted that multi-ingredient, liquid and/or softgel preparations are not suitable for
use in methamphetamine manufacture13. As a result, many jurisdictions have chosen to
exempt these preparations from control14. Experiments were undertaken to determine the
viability of these exempt preparations in the manufacture of methamphetamine. Three sets
of experiments were conducted:
a. A series of extraction techniques were applied to five representative multi-
ingredient, liquid and softgel OTC pseudoephedrine preparations to determine if
pseudoephedrine could be extracted from the other pharmaceutical ingredients15.
Simple, readily available extraction methods were shown to be successful in the
isolation of pseudoephedrine from the five OTC products examined.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

b. Pseudoephedrine extracted from each of the selected multi-ingredient, liquid and


softgel OTC pseudoephedrine preparations was successfully converted to
methamphetamine via the Red Phosphorus – iodine reduction method15.
c. Four selected multi-ingredient, liquid and softgel OTC pseudoephedrine
preparations were successfully converted to methamphetamine using the “One-Pot”
lithium – ammonia reduction method without any pre-extraction (or separation) of
the pseudoephedrine from the other pharmaceutical ingredients16.

Goal 3 – Training of Forensic Chemistry Analysts, Clandestine Laboratory Scene Responders,


and User Agencies

The final goal of the project was to disseminate the results of the research in a manner that would
provide practical and beneficial information to a number of different audiences. Three general
groups of people were initially targeted as the recipients of the research results. These were:
1. Forensic chemists directly involved in the analysis of samples and interpretation of data
obtained from clandestine laboratories;
2. Clandestine laboratory scene responders responsible for scene interpretation, safety, and
sample collection at clandestine laboratory scenes. These may include forensic chemists,
clandestine laboratory trained law enforcement officers and others;
3. User agency personnel including law enforcement officers, evidence officers, prosecutors,
defense attorneys, emergency response personnel, health department personnel, and other
individuals directly or indirectly involved in clandestine laboratory work. Although not
originally identified as belonging to this last group, it was found necessary to provide
information concerning this project to legislators and other regulatory personnel.
Dissemination of the grant project results to the groups listed above has been done through written
papers, training videos (produced in cooperation with the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force
and Detective Shawn Sheridan), professional meeting presentations, formal and informal training
sessions, and legislative testimony17. Exhibits 8, 9 and 10 below list the products that have been
generated as a result of the work done on this grant. In addition, numerous requests have been
received for copies of the videos and the executive summary on the multi-ingredient tablet
extraction results.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following people for their contributions to this project. Much
of the practical street level drug intelligence data (including recipes and manufacturing trends)
were provided by Detective Shawn Sheridan of the Snohomish Regional Drug Task Force. He
was also responsible for shooting, producing and editing the videos that were put together during
this project. Mr. Ira Lurie, DEA Special Testing, Sterling, VA provided valuable assistance with
the CE methods development work. Mr. Jeff Jagmin (WSP Crime Lab, Tacoma) and Mr. Martin
McDermot (WSP Crime Lab, Seattle) also assisted with the implementation of the new CE anion
method in other laboratories. A special thanks to Mr. Larry Pederson of the Greeley-Weld County
Forensic Laboratory, Greeley, CO, who graciously provided adjudicated case samples for
evaluation using the methods developed during this project. Ms. Drexie Malone (WSP Crime Lab
Librarian) provided extensive assistance with literature searches. The authors would also like to
acknowledge the support of the Washington State Patrol and the many individuals within the
organization that supported this project and made it a success.
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 8 – Products Resulting From Grant Research Audience


Publications

Knops, Lori A.; Northrop, David M.; Person, Eric C., "Capillary Forensic Chemists
Electrophoretic Analysis of Phosphorus Species in Clandestine
Laboratory Samples," Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51(1), 2006.

Heegel, Robert A., Knops, Lori A., Northrop, David M., and Person, Forensic Chemists
Eric C., “Abbreviated Reaction Times In the Red Phosphorus – Iodine
Manufacturing Method”, Journal Of The Clandestine Laboratory
Investigating Chemists Association, Volume 14 Number 3 – July
2004, p. 11.

Person, Eric C.; Knops, Lori A.; Northrop, David M.; Sheridan, Forensic Chemists
Shawn P., “ ‘One-Pot’ Methamphetamine Manufacture,” Journal of
Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association, Volume
14, Number 2, April, 2005, pp. 14-15.

Northrop, David M.; Knops, Lori A.; Person, Eric C., Forensic Chemists
"Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications
Containing Pseudoephedrine in Multi-ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel
Preparations," Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory Investigating
Chemists Association, Volume 15, Number 2, April, 2005, pp. 11-19.

Heegel, Robert A.; and Northrop, David M., “‛One-Pot’ Forensic Chemists
Methamphetamine Manufacture via the Lithium-Ammonia Method
with Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and/or Soft-gel Pseudoephedrine
Preparations,” Submitted to Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory
Investigating Chemists Association, November, 2005, In Press

Person, Eric C.; Knops, Lori A.; Northrop, David M.; and Heegel, Forensic Chemists
Robert A.; “Phosphorus-Containing Reducing Agents:
A review of their chemistry and use in the manufacture of
methamphetamine and the significance of observed phosphate,
phosphite, and hypophosphite in clandestine laboratory casework,” to
be submitted to the Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory
Investigating Chemists Association, January 2006.

Multi-Ingredient Cold Medicines Used to Produce Methamphetamine, Law-Enforcement


Narcotics Digest, Volume 4, Number 17, April 26, 2005. Personnel

Northrop, David M.; Knops, Lori A.; Person, Eric C., Non – law
"Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications enforcement
Containing Pseudoephedrine in Multi-ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel Personnel
Preparations," – Executive Summary
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 9 – Products Resulting From Research Audience


Training Videos
Forensic Chemists,
“One-Pot” Methamphetamine Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Manufacturing Methamphetamine Using Hypophosphorous Acid” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Manufacturing Methamphetamine Using the Red Phosphorus / Clandestine Lab
Hydriodic Acid Method” Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Extracting Ephedrine” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Red Phosphorus from Matchbook Strikers” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Iodine Extraction” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Stripping Lithium Batteries” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
“Acid and Matches – A Bad Combination” Clandestine Lab
Scene Responders,
Law Enforcement
Personnel
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 10 – Products Resulting From Research Audience


Presentations

“One-Pot” Methamphetamine Manufacture – Northwest Association Forensic Chemists


of Forensic Scientists’ Spring Meeting, Missoula, MT, April 2004
Forensic Chemists,
“One-Pot” Methamphetamine Manufacture – Washington State Patrol Clandestine Lab
Crime Laboratory Chemistry Functional Area Meeting, May 2004 Scene Responders
Law Enforcement
The Clandestine Manufacture of Methamphetamine: Chemistry and Personnel,
Trends – Snohomish County Meth Watch Group and the Snohomish Community
County Meth Action Team, June 2004 Business Leaders

The Chemistry of Methamphetamine Manufacture – The Snohomish Law Enforcement


County Bar Association, July 2004 Personnel, Social
Workers
Forensic Chemists,
“One-Pot” Methamphetamine Manufacture – Clandestine Laboratory Clandestine Lab
Investigating Chemists’ 14th Annual Technical Training Seminar, Scene Responders,
September 2004 Law Enforcement
Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
Evaluation of Samples from Phosphorus Methods of Clandestine Lab
Methamphetamine Manufacture using Capillary Electrophoresis and Scene Responders,
GC/MS – Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists’ 14th Annual Law Enforcement
Technical Training Seminar, September 2004 Personnel

Training videos (Exhibit 8) presented – Washington State Patrol Forensic Chemists


Crime Laboratory Chemistry Functional Area Meeting, October 2004

Training videos (Exhibit 8) presented – Washington State Patrol Clandestine Lab


SWAT, November 2004 Scene Responders

Capillary Electrophoretic Analysis of Inorganic Species in Forensic Scientists


Clandestine Laboratories – American Academy of Forensic Sciences
57th Annual Meeting, February 2005

CE Anion Analysis – Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Forensic Chemists


Chemistry Functional Area Meeting, April 2005

Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications Forensic Chemists


Containing Pseudoephedrine In Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel
Preparations – Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Chemistry
Functional Area Meeting, April 2005
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

Exhibit 10 – Products Resulting From Research Audience


Presentations

Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications Legislators


Containing Pseudoephedrine In Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel
Preparations – Oregon State Legislature, June 2005
Forensic Chemists,
Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications Clandestine Lab
Containing Pseudoephedrine In Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel Scene Responders,
Preparations – Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists’ 15th Law Enforcement
Annual Technical Training Seminar, September 2005 Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
‛One-Pot’ Methamphetamine Manufacture via the Lithium-Ammonia Clandestine Lab
Method with Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and/or Soft-gel Scene Responders,
Pseudoephedrine Preparations – Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Law Enforcement
Chemists’ 15th Annual Technical Training Seminar, September 2005 Personnel
Forensic Chemists,
Phosphorus Containing Reducing Agents – Clandestine Laboratory Clandestine Lab
Investigating Chemists’ 15th Annual Technical Training Seminar, Scene Responders,
September 2005 Law Enforcement
Personnel

‛One-Pot’ Methamphetamine Manufacture via the Lithium-Ammonia Forensic Chemists


Method with Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and/or Soft-gel
Pseudoephedrine Preparations – Washington State Patrol Crime
Laboratory Chemistry Functional Area Meeting, November 2005

Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications Clandestine Lab


Containing Pseudoephedrine In Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel Scene Responders
Preparations – Washington State Patrol SWAT, November 2005

Training videos (Exhibit 8) presented – Washington State Patrol Clandestine Lab


SWAT, November 2005 Scene Responders

Methamphetamine Manufacture From Cold and Allergy Medications Forensic Scientists


Containing Pseudoephedrine In Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and Softgel
Preparations – Northwest Association of Forensic Science Fall
Meeting, Seattle, WA, November 2005

The Chemistry of Phosphorus-Containing Reducing Agents and the Forensic Scientists


Significance of Phosphate, Phosphite, and Hypophosphite in
Clandestine Laboratory Casework – American Academy of Forensic
Science 58th Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, February, 2006
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

References

1. Soga, Tomayoshi and Ross, Gordon A., “Capillary Electrophoresis Determination of


Inorganic and Organic Anions using 2.6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid: Effect of Electrolytes
Complexing Ability” Journal of Chromatography 767 (1997): 223-230.
2. Hargadon, Kelly A. and McCord, Bruce R., “Explosive Residue Analysis by Capillary
Electrophoresis and Ion Chromatography” Journal of Chromatography 602 (1992): 241-
247.
3. Romano, Joe; Jandik, Petr; Jones, William R.; Jackson, Peter E; “Optimization of
Inorganic Capillary Electrophoresis for the Analysis of Anionic Solutes in Real Samples”
Journal of Chromatography 546 (1991): 411-421.
4. Romano, Joe, Jandik, Petr, Jones, William R., and Jackson, Peter E. inventors, Analis SA,
assignee, “Capillary Electrophoresis Method Using Initialized Capillary and Polyanion-
Containing Buffer and Chemical Kit” US patent 5,611,903, (March 22, 1995).
5. Riviello, John M. and Harrold, Michael P., “Capillary Electrophoresis of Inorganic Cations
and Low-Molecular Weight Amines Using Copper-based Electrolyte with Indirect UV
Detection” Journal of Chromatography 652 (1993): 385-392.
6. Weston, Andrea; Brown, Phyllis R.; Jandik, Petr; Jones, William R.; and Heckenberg,
Allan L.; “Factors Affecting the Separation of Inorganic Metal Cations by Capillary
Electrophoresis” Journal of Chromatography 593 (1992): 289-295.
7. Skinner, Harry F., “Methamphetamine Synthesis Via HI/Red Phosphorus Reduction of
Ephedrine” Forensic Science International 48 (1990): 123-134.
8. Heegel, Robert A., Knops, Lori A., Northrop, David M., and Person, Eric C., “Abbreviated
Reaction Times In the Red Phosphorus – Iodine Manufacturing Method”, Journal Of The
Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association, 14(3) (July 2004): 11.
9. Person, Eric C., Knops, Lori A., Northrop, David M., and Heegel, Robert A., “Phosphorus
Containing Reducing Agents: A review of their chemistry and use in the manufacture of
methamphetamine and the significance of observed phosphate, phosphite, and
hypophosphite in clandestine laboratory casework,” to be submitted to the Journal of the
Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association, January 2006.
10. Person, Eric C.; Knops, Lori A.; Northrop, David M.; and Sheridan, Shawn P., “ ‘One-Pot’
Methamphetamine Manufacture,” Journal of Clandestine Laboratory Investigating
Chemists Association, 14(2), (April, 2005): 14-15.
11. Person, Eric C. and Knops, Lori A., “Clandestine Ammonia Generation” Journal Of The
Clandestine Laboratory Investigating Chemists Association, 14 (1) (January 2004): 20-25.
12. Roosevelt, Margot, “The Cold Pill Crackdown: To Fight the Meth Epidemic, States Go
After Legal Sniffle Remedies at the Corner Drugstore” Time (February 7, 2005): 56–57.
13. Cutler, Rachel, “Pseudoephedrine extraction presentation [report of industry arguments],”
CLIC List Server, January 26, 2005.
14. Hollenbeck, Trish, “‘A Good Step’: Bill Would Enter Buyers of Cold Medicine Into
Database,” Northwest Arkansas Times (February 14, 2005). Retrieved March 14, 2005
from http:// Northwest Arkansas Times,
nwanews.com/story.php?paper=nwat&section=News& storyid=25348
NIJ grant 2003-LT-BX-K004 Final Report

15. Northrop, David M.; Knops, Lori A.; Person, Eric C., "Methamphetamine Manufacture
From Cold and Allergy Medications Containing Pseudoephedrine in Multi-ingredient,
Liquid, and Softgel Preparations," Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory Investigating
Chemists Association 15(2), (April, 2005): 11-19.
16. Heegel, Robert A.; and Northrop, David M., “‛One-Pot’ Methamphetamine Manufacture
via the Lithium-Ammonia Method with Multi-Ingredient, Liquid, and/or Soft-gel
Pseudoephedrine Preparations,” Journal of the Clandestine Laboratory Investigating
Chemists Association, (November 2005): In Press.
17. Rose, Joseph, “House Panel Unanimous in Advancing Cold Pill Bill” The Oregonian (June
24, 2005). Retrieved November 3, 2005 from
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/front_page/111960743230484
0.xml&coll=7&=2 .

You might also like