Research Method
Research Method
PHILOSOPHY
The PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY is committed to the pursuit of excellence relative to student’s professional
growth and development.
VISION
PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY envisions producing quality graduates fully equipped with knowledge, attitudes,
values, and skills and who are globally competitive in their chosen profession ever ready to render quality services.
MISSION STATEMENT
PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY provides quality education to every student through a well-balanced research
oriented learning environment that develops critical and creative thinking for maximum development of individual’s talents and capabilities.
INSTITUTIONAL OBJECTIVES
In pursuit of its Vision and Mission, PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY will achieve the following:
1. Provide programs and activities that will enhance the development of the students physically, intellectually, culturally, emotionally, socially,
spiritually and morally.
2. Provide college education opportunities to poor but deserving students through the PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY scholarship grants.
3. Train students with globally competitive technical skills that will make them competent and capable of handling challenges in life.
4. Provide manpower needs of the country with professionally qualified graduates imbued with dignity and high moral values who are mature,
productive, self-reliant, responsible and self-disciplined citizens.
Page | 1 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
SPECIAL OBJECTIVES
To provide the country with globally competitive and professionally licensed graduates as integral part of the total manpower needed for the
economic development in the national and international levels.
CORE VALUES
P Professionalism
H High Spirituality
I Integrity
L Love of Humanity
C Compassionate and Competent
S Solidarity
T Transformative
Issue Date: June, 2018 Revision Status: 0 Revision Date: June, 2018
Page | 2 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Page | 3 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
PHILIPPINE COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY – Nalsian, Calasiao, Pangasinan
DETAILED TEACHING SYLLABUS(DTS) AND INSTRUCTOR’S GUIDE (IG’S) Academic Year 2018-2019
Form
No.:BSMEIG#12RESEARCHA Units 1 Program [] BSCE [] BSEE [x] BSME [] BSECE [] BSCOE
Issue Date: 06/2018
Course Lecture
RESEARCH A 0 Curriculum [] 1st year [] 2nd year [X] 3rd year [] 4th year
Code Hours
Course METHODS OF Laboratory
3 Term [] 1st Semester [X] 2nd Semester [] Summer
Name RESEARCH Hours
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course covers the study of the methodologies used in conducting an engineering research. It includes the types and application of research,
characteristics of a good research, research design, research instrument and data gathering procedures. It also deals with the study of writing a
research proposal and various formats.
Page | 4 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
COURSE
: RESEARCH A
CODE
COURSE
: METHODS OF RESEARCH PREREQUISITE : 3RD Year Standing
DESCRIPTIVE TITLE
LECTURE LABORATORY
COURSE CREDITS : 3 Unit CONTACT : 3 HOURS CONTACT : 0
HOURS / WEEK HOURS / WEEK
At the end of the course, the students would be able to:
1. Explain the research methods and procedures.
COURSE OUTCOMES : 2. Write a research proposal.
3. Formulate a research problem.
4. Defend research proposal.
Page | 5 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
d. Introduction
e. Methods
f. Results
g. Discussion
h. References
i. Appendices
➢ Identify main purpose Review of related Teaching Activity: • Learning Written 7-8
and significant outcomes literatures Online discussion: Zoom Management System Assessment 6 hours
of review of related – Criteria of related and/or Big Blue Button (LMS - Moodle) Assignments
literatures literatures, Learning Activity: Your Research Quizzes
➢ Identify characteristics • Participate in the Project: Designing and Midterm
critiquing
of a good related literature Online discussion Planning Your Work; Examination
guidelines and
• Watching videos N. Walliman; Los
➢ Generate review of concepts • Advance reading on Angeles, Sage
related literature
the given lecture Publications;
Organization of the notes. 9- 10
Organize chapter 1 of a Research Proposal 6 Hours
thesis proposal – Chapter 1:
Introduction
Page | 6 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
Organize chapter 2 of a Organization of the 11-12
thesis proposal Research Proposal 6 Hours
–Chapter 2: Review
of Related Literature
Midterm Examination
Final Examination
PART C
COURSE ASSESSMENT:
(Criteria for Grading)
Final Grades of the students will be based from knowledge and understanding of the course which will constitute fifty percent (50%) of the final
grade. The other fifty percent will be based from the Assessment Result (Evaluation of the course outcomes)
Knowledge and understanding will be evaluated according to the following:
1. Examinations (Check-Up Examination, Preliminary Examination, Mid-Term Examination, Semi-Final Examination, and Final
Examination);
2. Quizzes; and
Page | 7 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
4. Assignments
5. Including the laboratory activity and laboratory report if the course has a laboratory component.
The final course grade will be computed according to the following formula:
1. [(Knowledge and Understanding Result) x 0.50] + [Assessment Result] x 0.50;
2. The passing standard shall be the grade of 50% but the student must have attended at least eighty percent (80%) of the total number of
required meeting of the course, and must have a rating of “Competent” in all the Assessment Result; and;
3. The table below shows a sample of the range of percentage marks and their corresponding equivalents.
PERCENTAGE LETTER DESCRIPTIVE FIVE POINT
REMARKS
GRADE GRADE RATING GRADING
Meets minimum competence with exceptional
90% – 100% A Excellent 1.0
score
Meets minimum competence with over and above
80% – 89% B Very Good 1.5
average score
Meets minimum competence with above average
70% – 79% C Good 2.0
score
60% – 69% D Satisfactory 2.5 Meets minimum competence with average score
50% – 59% E Passed 3.0 Meets minimum competence
0% – 49% F Failed 5.0 Does not meet the minimum competence
Page | 8 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT
each week. The previously assigned problems will be collected for grading and the solutions will be derived in class. This process is
designed to help the student thoroughly understand the concepts and applications of the material covered.
D. Academic Honesty: All students are expected to behave with academic honesty. It is not academically honest, for example, to
misrepresent another person’s words or ideas as one’s own, to take credit for someone else’s work or ideas, to copy and paste material
from another document or from the internet, to accept help on a test or to obtain advanced information or confidential test materials, or to
act in a way that might harm another student’s chance for academic success. When the instructor believes that a student has failed to
maintain academic honesty, he or she may be given an “F” grade, either for the assignment, laboratory report, quiz, examination, or the
course depending upon the severity of the offense.
Page | 9 CONTROLLED COPY FORM NO.: BSCEIG#1PMEC7L APPROVED BY: SCHOOL PRESIDENT