Dissertation Synopsis Abhijeet Singh 001
Dissertation Synopsis Abhijeet Singh 001
Dissertation Synopsis Abhijeet Singh 001
DISSERTATION SYNOPSIS
DISSERTATION PROJECT ON
Faculty Adviser-
MR. ABHAY KUMAR
Assistant Professor of Law
MR. AKASH KUMAR
Assistant Professor of Law
1
Submitted by
ABHIJEET SINGH
(Roll no. 01)
2
DISSERTATION SYNOPSIS
1. INTRODUCTION
Trial by media usually refers to a practice in which the media begins to investigate
themselves and forms a public opinion against the accused before the trial begins.
This infringes and affects the trial in violation of the defendant's right to a fair trial.
The defendant who has to be considered innocent until he is proven guilty is therefore
now presumed to be guilty in violation of his rights. The impact and growth of
electronic media over the last two decades , especially in the last ten years, has
changed the whole scheme of reporting and its responsibility towards the citizens. On
the one hand, the media has created a well-informed citizenry by informing the public
about many incidents of crime and national importance. While on the other hand the
media violates the right of the citizens in many cases.
The subject 'Trial by the Media' has been discussed almost every day recently by civil
rights activists, constitutional lawyers , judges and academics. The amount of
advertising that any crime, suspect or accused gets in the media has reached alarming
heights with the increase of television and cable channels. Innocent individuals are
sometimes convicted for no reason while others don’t get a fair trial or get a higher
sentence than they deserve. There seems to be very little restraint on the media in the
administration of criminal justice. If media exercise unrestricted or unregulated
freedom to publish information on a criminal case, this will damage the minds of the
public. One cannot ignore the value of the media, as it reports, educates and makes the
public alert. It is known as the "fourth pillar" of democracy.
However sometimes the media tries to sensationalize news and distort facts to draw
people’s attention towards it so that they can get more amount of views. There are
instances in which the media goes beyond its borders, and in place of just letting
people know the facts, they act as an institution judging any matter blatantly
disregarding the principle of "presumption of innocence." This can even serve as a
danger to the right to a fair trial. For these reasons only freedom of press must be
there but it needs to be within reasonable restriction. The issue becomes more
complicated when media covers issues which are sub-judice in nature and is pending
before the court of law. This clearly harms the interest of the parties who are involved
in the particular case.
Media has undergone from being a simple medium of communication to the public to
being a harbinger of change. It plays a vital role in molding the opinion of the society
and it is capable of changing the whole viewpoint through which people perceive
3
various events. Heinous crimes must be condemned and the media would be justified
in calling for the perpetrators to be punished in accordance with the law.
However, the media cannot take away the functions of the judiciary and deviate from
objective and conduct biased reporting. Trial by media refers to pre-trial exposure of a
case by the media through different communication means like television, internet,
and radio. While a media shackled by government regulations is unhealthy for
democracy, the implications of continued unaccountability is even more damaging.
Steps need to be taken in order to prevent media trials from eroding the civil rights of
citizens. The media must have a clearer definition of their rights and duties, and the
courts must be given the power to punish those who flagrantly disregard them.
1. LITERATURE REVIEW
4
In this article the author explains crucial point on the contemporary issue that Media has
now reincarnated itself into a ‘public court’ (Janta Adalat) and has started interfering into
court proceedings. It completely overlooks the vital gap between an accused and a
convict keeping at stake the golden principles of ‘presumption of innocence until proven
guilty’ and ‘guilt beyond reasonable doubt’. Now, what we observe is media trial where
the media itself does a separate investigation, builds a public opinion against the accused
even before the court takes cognizance of the case. By this way, it prejudices the public
and sometimes even judges and as a result the accused, that should be assumed innocent,
is presumed as a criminal leaving all his rights and liberty unredressed.
2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
The main objectives of this research project are:
3. RESEARCH QUESTION
4. MATHODOLOGY
The study is analytical and descriptive. It is non-empirical. The sources for the
research are secondary sources consisting of books, journals and online articles
5. TENTATIVE CHAPTERISATION
Chapter 1 – Introduction
This chapter would be in regard to brief overview of the research that would be undertaken.
5
This would cover significance of the study, objectives of the study, hypothesis, research
questions, scope of the study, methodology. This chapter would cover all the points in brief,
that would be discussed at length.
6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Reports -
• 200th Law Commission of India Report, Trial by Media: Free Speech vs. Fair Trial under Criminal
Procedure (amendments to the Contempt of Court Act, 1971), (2006),
http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/rep200.pdf