FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED

WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 2 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY SHEET

REV STATUS DATE ISSUED UPDATE / AMENDMENT DETAILS

В IFR 21-07-2014 ISSUED FOR REVIEW

C IFA 14-09-2014 ISSUED FOR APPROVAL

00 AFD 12-11-2014 APPROVED FOR DESIGN

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 3 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

CONTENT

1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5
2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 6

2.1 Objectives of Design to Capacity Workshop ................................................................................................ 6

2.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 6

2.3 Workshop Attendance ................................................................................................................................... 7

3 BASIS OF DESIGN ............................................................................................... 8

3.1 Production Flowrate....................................................................................................................................... 8

3.2 GOR Uncertainty ........................................................................................................................................... 8

3.3 Compositions................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.4 Availability ...................................................................................................................................................... 8

3.5 Turndown........................................................................................................................................................ 8
4 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................ 10

4.1 Stabilised Crude Oil ..................................................................................................................................... 10

4.2 Sales Gas........................................................................................................................................................ 10

4.3 LPG Product ................................................................................................................................................. 10

5 PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA .......................................................................... 11

5.1 Equipment Design Margins ......................................................................................................................... 11

5.2 Heat Exchangers ........................................................................................................................................... 11

5.3 Air Cooled Exchangers ................................................................................................................................ 11

5.4 Pumps ............................................................................................................................................................ 11

5.5 Distillation Columns ..................................................................................................................................... 12

5.6 Piping ............................................................................................................................................................. 12

5.7 Mechanical Design Margin .......................................................................................................................... 12

6 SYSTEM DESIGN MARGINS ............................................................................. 13

6.1 System Block Diagram ................................................................................................................................. 13

6.2 Well Flowlines ............................................................................................................................................... 13

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 4 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

6.3 Wellpads ........................................................................................................................................................ 13

6.4 Trunklines ..................................................................................................................................................... 13

6.5 Slugcatcher .................................................................................................................................................... 13

6.6 Oil Treatment Plant Trains ......................................................................................................................... 13

6.7 Desalter.......................................................................................................................................................... 14

6.8 Produced Water............................................................................................................................................ 14

6.9 Water Injection ............................................................................................................................................. 15

6.10 Gas Compression .......................................................................................................................................... 15

6.11 Gas Sweetening Technology ........................................................................................................................ 15

6.12 Gas Dehydration and Mercaptan Removal ................................................................................................ 15

6.13 Gas Hydrocarbon Dewpoint Control.......................................................................................................... 15

6.14 LPG Bullets ................................................................................................................................................... 15

6.15 Propane Refrigeration ................................................................................................................................. 15

6.16 Utilities .......................................................................................................................................................... 15

7 WORKSHOPS FINDING ..................................................................................... 16
8 ACTION PLAN .................................................................................................... 17
9 IMPACT OF DESIGN TO CAPACITY REVIEW .................................................. 18
APPENDIX 1 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP PROCEDURE....................................... 20
APPENDIX 2 ................................................................................................................. 21
APPENDIX 3 ................................................................................................................. 23
APPENDIX 4 ................................................................................................................. 24
APPENDIX 5 DESIGN MARGIN TABLE ................................................. 25
APPENDIX 6 DESIGN TO CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS ...... 26

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 5 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

1 SUMMARY

The Design to Capacity Value Improving Practice workshop was held on Monday 23rd June
2014. The Design to Capacity workshop is intended to identify where design margins are
required to meet project objectives and provide assurance in meeting those objectives. It is also
intended to avoid duplication of margins appearing at the design at different stages of the design
development. By explicitly identifying the required design margins, the final development
concept can be optimized.
Design margin can appear from many sources. These sources include the Basis of Design,
equipment sizing practices and industry standards. The key sources of design margin were
systematically reviewed by the workshop and the findings from the discussions are documented
in this report.
The agreed design margins need to be incorporated into the key design documents such as the
Basis of Design and the Process Design Criteria.
There are a number of areas that require further review before the design margins can be agreed:
• The acid gas treating facilities will be affected by the technology selection – the design
margins should be reviewed once the technology has been selected and a proper
assessment can be performed
• Utility systems will be reviewed once the design load cases have been defined (again,
these will be affected by the acid gas treating technology selection). These are likely to
be subject to specific review, rather than having a blanket design margin applied.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 6 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

2 INTRODUCTION

( ), in partnership with the Company of , is

currently planning to develop its upstream production facilities and infrastructure to meet a target
of 1.2MMBOPD of production in the 2 oil field in . The field consists
of two primary reservoirs, and , which will be developed as separate projects. It
is envisaged that the reservoir will produce up to 650MBOPD of the 1.2MMBOPD
targeted from the entire field. Presently the development is in the FEED (Define) phase
of project execution and design.
WorleyParsons has been contracted to execute the FEED phase of the Development
Project. The development includes well pads, gathering systems, water injection facilities, gas
and water treatment, a gas turbine power plant, a light oil export pipeline and tank farm
upgrades, tie-ins to the natural gas liquids and gas export systems and further expansion of
supporting facilities and infrastructure as necessary.
The Project aims to produce a comprehensive FEED Package in order to allow the progression of
the Project to the EPC (Execute) Phase.

2.1 Objectives of Design to Capacity Workshop

The objectives of the Design to Capacity workshop were:
1. Ensure that design margins are aligned with Project Drivers and facility development
plans.
2. Achieve early alignment between the project’s business, technical, and manufacturing
representatives on the most appropriate level of plant flexibility and overcapacity
3. Save project capital by helping designers fully understand the operability of every
process step and equipment item.
Design to Capacity should specifically take into account the required flexibility of process
facilities, primarily the GTP, to be able to accommodate subsurface uncertainties with regards to
fluid composition, and H2S content in particular.
The requirements for the Design to Capacity VIP workshop are defined in the Design to
Capacity VIP Procedure 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Rev 00 (Appendix 1).

2.2 Methodology
The review worked through the following elements of the design in sequence to identify and
clarify the design margins that are being introduced to the project:
• Basis of Design
o Feed conditions
o Key facility parameters
• Product Specifications
• Process Design Criteria
o Design margins by equipment type
8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 7 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

• Review of design margins by system, as defined in the Block Flow Diagram (Appendix
4)
o Inlet and gathering
o Oil processing
o Produced water handling
o Gas processing
o LPG fractionation
o Acid gas treatment
o Utility systems
The presentation used for the VIP workshop is provided in Appendix 3.

2.3 Workshop Attendance

The Design to Capacity Workshop was held in the project offices on Monday 23rd June 2014.
A copy of the attendance sheet is provided in Appendix 2.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 8 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

3 BASIS OF DESIGN

3.1 Production Flowrate

The production target of 650 MBOPD is the annual average target rate and must take into
account the availability target to achieve the design stream day rate.
The primary objective of the project is meet the 650 MBOPD target and ensure that the oil
production is not constrained by associated production systems such as gas and LPG processing.

3.2 GOR Uncertainty

The Basis of Design lists a range of GORs for the crude oil samples that range from 91 to
148 m3/m3. has received advice that the observed GORs are not consistent with the
regional GOR expected for a 33ºAPI crude oil and the expected GOR is 158.4 m3/m3.
Furthermore, there is uncertainty over the GORs that will be realized. wishes to avoid
constraining oil production by having gas processing capacity. An additional 15%
design margin will be added to the gas processing facilities to account for the potential of higher
GORs.
The oil gathering facilities, oil stabilisation facilities and utilities will be designed without the
GOR uncertainty margin.

3.3 Compositions
A range of crude oil compositions have been noted over different horizons in the field.
Further clarity of expected crude oil compositions is not likely until the pilot production program
is underway.
The gas processing facilities design will be progressed based on the average gas properties
reported in the Basis of Design, adjusted for the higher GOR.
Specific analysis of variations in crude composition will be required for specific units and these
requirements are identified in Section 2.

3.4 Availability
The definition of availability was clarified in the meeting, in line with the definition in Section
3.1 above. The availability target of 0.95 requires a design margin of 5% on flowrate to account
for correction from stream day flowrates to calendar day flowrates.

3.5 Turndown
The turndown requirement of 40% was further defined in the meeting. The turndown applies to
each train of equipment – each train must be able to be turned down to 40% of its design
flowrate.
With the gas processing system, with the extra allowance of 15% for GOR uncertainty this
represents a turndown to 35% of design flowrate.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 9 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

The crude oil train is designed for 100% recycle and has complete turndown. Further work is
required to clarify how the 40% turndown will be achieved with the gas processing facilities.
[Action 1]

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 10 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

4 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS

4.1 Stabilised Crude Oil

Stabilised crude oil has a key specification of RVP:
Reid Vapor Pressure [RVP@38ºC] 6.3 to 6.5 psi (42.8 to 44.2 kPa)
The range of values for RVP needs to be clarified – does this represent a not to exceed value for
the crude oil or does the crude stabilisation system need to be operated to produce crude oil
within this specification range. [Action 2]
If this specification represents a not to exceed value the facilities will be designed with 5%
margin on the RVP target.
The water content specification in stabilized crude oil is seen as onerous and will require careful
assessment of the facilities design.

4.2 Sales Gas

Of the specifications for sales gas, only the hydrocarbon dewpoint is seen as critical in defining
process functionality – other process requirements drive tighter requirements for the other
specifications.
The design will allow a 3ºC margin on hydrocarbon dewpoint temperature.

4.3 LPG Product

The key parameter for LPG product is the RVP specification. The following was noted:
• The RVP specification varies between summer and winter
• The RVP specification is very low compared to many other LPG specifications and will
require predominantly butane in the LPG.
• RVP is not normally used to specify LPG quality – true vapor pressure is normally used.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 11 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

5 PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA

5.1 Equipment Design Margins

Equipment design margins are contained within the Process Design Criteria (8015-0152-WP05-
00-000-PC-DC-12001). These equipment design margins were reviewed line by line.

5.2 Heat Exchangers

Heat exchangers have a number of sources of design margin imposed by the Process Design
Criteria:
• Normal 10% flow margin (20% for reboilers and condensers)
• Fouling factor
• Design approach temperature (normally 10ºC)
Specific actions required are:
• Confirm the source of the fouling factors and review the fouling factors in the Process
Design Criteria with industry sources such as TEMA [Action 3]
• At times different design approach temperatures have been used – these need to be
documented on a case by case basis. [Action 5]

5.3 Air Cooled Exchangers

Air cooled heat exchangers received detailed discussion in the workshop. The design ambient
air temperature of 46ºC is being reviewed. The consequences of exceeding 46ºC ambient air
temperature were discussed. At air temperatures above 46ºC:
• Design margins introduced elsewhere in the design will be used to help maintain
performance
• Production may need to be curtailed (slightly) during these high temperature events, but
there is the possibility of recovering production when ambient temperatures cool
overnight

5.4 Pumps
The pump design margins were generally accepted.
NPSH was specifically discussed. Process was instructed to advise the NPSH required, without
margin. Mechanical group will add margins to NPSH that are consistent with the type of pump
selected.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 12 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

5.5 Distillation Columns

Distillation columns are affected by a column system factor that accounts for the different
service types, allowable approach to flood and performance characteristics such as foaming
tendency.
A column system factor should be added that covers the crude stabilizer column. [Action 4]
The system factors for amine columns should be reviewed, possibly with input from the
technology suppliers. The amine system factors appeared high, based on the tendency for amine
systems to foam. [Action 4]

5.6 Piping
The piping sizing guidelines for liquid, gas and multiphase flow were reviewed. The multiphase
line sizing should include a guide on allowable flows such as 𝜌. 𝑣 2 . [Action 6]

5.7 Mechanical Design Margin

In general, the Mechanical department adds no additional margin to the data received on the
Process Datasheets.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 13 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

6 SYSTEM DESIGN MARGINS

6.1 System Block Diagram

The requirements of each specific system in the CPF and gathering system were reviewed by
reviewing each block in the System Block Diagram (Block Flow Diagram Overall Facility -
Process/Utility 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001 Rev C). A copy of the referenced
System Block Diagram is included in Appendix 4.

6.2 Well Flowlines

Well flowlines have been selected as a standard 6” for all wells. No further review of design
margins is required.

6.3 Wellpads
Wellpads will be fitted with a combination of 6, 8 and 10 slot well manifolds. No further review
of design margins is required.

6.4 Trunklines
Trunkline sizing and configuration is subject to specific review and optimization by the FEED
design. No further review of design margins is required in this workshop.

6.5 Slugcatcher
The slugcatcher (either finger type or vessel type) will require careful review of the slug/surge
volumes. The required design margin will be reviewed and agreed after comprehensive
sensitivity analysis.

6.6 Oil Treatment Plant Trains

Six parallel oil treatment trains will be installed. No design margin will be applied for flow
imbalance between the trains.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 14 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

Figure 6-1 Design Margins for Oil Treatment Plant

A 5% availability margin and a 10% process design margin will be added to each oil treatment
trains. This gives an overall margin of 15% for the overall plant combined. Design margins are
not additive across parallel trains – 6 trains with 15% margin does not give 90% margin for the
plant.

6.7 Desalter
The desalter has a conservative design specification of the water-in-oil content of the incoming
crude oil. This will provide sufficient design margin in the design of the Desalter.

6.8 Produced Water

Produced water has a conservative design specification of the oil-in-water content of the
incoming produced water. This will provide sufficient design margin in the design of the
produced water treatment system.
Produced water is forecast to have a prolonged ramp up in flowrates. The project proposes to
install the produced water treatment facilities in phases. Provided the phases are installed in a
timely manner there is no requirement to specify additional design margins.
8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 15 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

6.9 Water Injection

Water injection will experience rapid ramp-up in injection volumes. A specific review of design
margins for the water injection system will be required.
There are practical limits on the size of water injection pipelines to be installed. A philosophy of
selecting a maximum line size and looping the pipelines may be required.

6.10 Gas Compression

Gas compression will be affected by the GOR uncertainty allowance (Section 3.2). In addition,
the gas compression will need to consider the range in gas compositions that can be expected.
The gas composition will affect the gas molecular weight and power consumed by the
compressor.

6.11 Gas Sweetening Technology

The whole system of gas sweetening, solvent regeneration, acid gas enrichment, sulphur
recovery, etc will require specific review once the process technology selection has been
finalized. [Action 7]

6.12 Gas Dehydration and Mercaptan Removal

Gas dehydration assumes that 100% of mercaptans will slip through the initial raw gas
sweetening treatment.
Assuming mole sieves are adopted, the regeneration gas treatment system will see cyclic loads of
acid gas components desorbing from the mole sieve. The design needs to consider the peak
loads of these contaminants.

6.13 Gas Hydrocarbon Dewpoint Control

The gas hydrocarbon dewpoint unit needs to consider the possible range in gas compositions.
The approach will be to identify the maximum range in composition variation that can be
accommodated using the design margins (flow margin, GOR uncertainty margin) that are
incorporated in the design.

6.14 LPG Bullets

While not specifically related to Design to Capacity, the storage requirements of the LPG bullets
differs from the crude storage tanks and should be reviewed.

6.15 Propane Refrigeration

Propane refrigeration is a utility system. It will require review of the governing design case for
the utility loads. A subsequent review will be required to determine if additional design margin
is required or whether alternative methods (load shedding, etc.) can be used to manage extreme
design cases.

6.16 Utilities
Utilities will be like the propane refrigeration system and require review once the load cases
have been determined. In many cases these loads will be dependent on the acid gas treatment
technologies selected for the CPF.
8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 16 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

7 WORKSHOPS FINDING
The findings of the Design to Capacity Workshop have been summarized into a design margin
table that applies at the system level, see Appendix 5.
The Design to Capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 6

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 17 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

8 ACTION PLAN
There are a number of specific actions to resolve design margins identified in the report.

Number Action Responsible

1. Clarify how the turndown target will be achieved WorleyParsons Process

in the gas processing train

2. The stabilized crude oil RVP specification needs WorleyParsons Process

to be clarified. It is expressed as a range of values
and implies that the RVP must lie within this
range. This differs from normal industry practice.
WorleyParsons to raise a TQ for to address

3. Review the fouling factors for heat exchangers WorleyParsons Process

including comparing them to common industry
practice such as TEMA.

4. Review the distillation column system factors. WorleyParsons Process

Add a system factor for crude stabilizer service.
Review system factors for amine columns.

5. Document the different heat exchanger design WorleyParsons Process

approach temperatures that have been used for
different pieces of equipment.

6. Incorporate line sizing guidelines for multi-phase WorleyParsons Process

lines into the Process Design Criteria

7. Review design margins for the Gas Sweetening WorleyParsons Process

Section of the plant once the technology selection
has been finalized.

The design margins need to be incorporated into the Basis of Design and the Process Design
Criteria.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 18 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

9 IMPACT OF DESIGN TO CAPACITY REVIEW

The primary benefit of performing the Design to Capacity Review at this stage of the project
(finalizing the project Basis for Design and the project Process Flow Diagrams) is establishing
clear guidelines to the team of the design margins to be added to specific pieces of equipment.
The design margins apply at a system level and also at an equipment level. Both of these design
margins have been reviewed and documented.
Probably the most significant benefit to the project was resolution on how uncertainty in the Gas-
Oil ratio for the crude oil would be managed in the design.
Resolving these design margin issues now should be beneficial to the project in reducing rework
in the future, optimizing the equipment correctly from the start and providing a robust design
margin for the gas processing equipment such that oil production rates should not be constrained.

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
This document is property of the COMPANY and it shall not be disclosed to third parties, or reproduced, without permission of the
COMPANY.This document is tracked by ( ). When it is printed, it shall be considered as “For
information only”.The controlled copy is the version, and thus, it is the document holder’s responsibility to make sure that the latest
version is in use.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 20 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 1 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP PROCEDURE

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 -2 ( )

Project Define Phase

VIP PROCEDURE
DESIGN TO CAPACITY

ISSUED FOR
00 17-06-2014 IFI M. Mirsaidov A. Ali R. Osorio
INFORMATION

REV DATE STATUS ISSUE PURPOSE ISSUED BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY

COMPANY DOCUMENT ATTRIBUTES:

Company Contract Facility Sequence

Originator Code System Code Discipline Doc Type
Code Territory Code Code Number

8015 0152 L 00 000 PM PP 00004

This document is property of the COMPANY and it shall not be disclosed to third parties, or reproduced, without permission of the COMPANY.
This document is tracked by ( ). When it is printed, it shall be considered as “For information
only”.
The controlled copy is the version, and thus, it is the document holder’s responsibility to make sure that the latest version is in use.
 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 2 of 9

DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY SHEET

DATE
REV STATUS UPDATE / AMENDMENT DETAILS
ISSUED

00 IFI 17-06-2014 ISSUED FOR INFORMATION

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 3 of 9

CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................4
1.1 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................................................4
1.2 Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................4
1.3 Reference Documents ..............................................................................................................4
2 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP .....................................................................................................5
2.1 Definition .................................................................................................................................5
2.2 Applicability and Scope ...........................................................................................................5
3 DTC VIP IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................................................5
3.1 Workshop .................................................................................................................................5
3.2 Representation and Facilitation................................................................................................6
3.3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................6
3.4 Recording Findings and Action Plan/Tracker..........................................................................7
4 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP CLOSE OUT ..............................................................................7
ANNEX 1 .............................................................................................................................................8

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 4 of 9

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose of this Document

The purpose of this Document is to outline the procedure to be applied in the course of one of the
Value Improvement Practices, namely the Design to Capacity, implemented as part of
FEED activities during the DEFINE Phase of the Project.

1.2 Abbreviations
BEDD Basic Engineering Design Data
BOD Basis of Design
CAPEX Capital expenditure
DTC Design to Capacity
FEED Front-end Engineering and Design
GTP Gas Treatment Plant
GTPP Gas Turbine Power Plant
HMB Heat and Material Balance
IPA Independent Project Analysis

Mid-East
PAP Project Assurance Plan
PEP Project Execution Plan
PIC Person in Charge
PFD Process Flow Diagram
UFD Utility Flow Diagram
VIP Value Improvement Practice
Worley Parsons

1.3 Reference Documents

Reference documents for this DTC VIP Procedure are:
FEED Scope of Services 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-SW-00001 (Rev 01)
Project Execution Plan 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PM-PE-12001
Project Assurance Plan 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PM-PN-12001
Engineering (SEAL) Plan 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-AL-PN-12001
Project Planning Package 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PN-PN-12002

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 5 of 9

Value Improving Practices –

- -PRA-GDL-0058
Design to Capacity Guideline
Value Improving Practices –
- -PRA-PRD-0059
Design to Capacity Procedure
Design to Capacity Workshop Template - -PRA-TMP-0060

2 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP

2.1 Definition
Design to Capacity VIP, as defined by , is a structured process that evaluates the true required
maximum capacity of each system and major piece of equipment relative to the desired overall
facility capacity.
According to IPA, DTC provides a method of achieving early alignment between a project’s
business, technical, and manufacturing representatives on the most appropriate level of plant
flexibility and overcapacity. This helps to save project capital by helping designers fully understand
the operability of every process step and equipment item.
The rationale behind carrying out the Design to Capacity VIP is that often systems are designed
with a degree of conservatism, or safety factor, in order to ensure that the plant will operate at its
nameplate capacity, and that probability of encountering operational problems in the future is
reduced. However, in reality too much over capacity can by itself lead to operational problems. On
the other side, if during engineering the design margin is set at very minimal level, and future
expansion is the case for that particular facility, this approach might create problems with future
debottlenecking for expansion purposes. Both of these cases are associated with operability
problems and with additional investments, which could have been avoided otherwise.

2.2 Applicability and Scope

Applicability of DTC VIP is defined as per Project Assurance Plan.
As part of DEFINE Phase activities, the scope of DTC is to ensure that design margins are
aligned with Project Drivers and facility development plans. DTC should specifically take into
account the required flexibility of process facilities, primarily the GTP, to be able to accommodate
subsurface uncertainties with regards to fluid composition, and H2S content in particular.
DTC will cover design capacities at the levels of the Project, systems and individual major
equipment items. DTC will not cover GTPP. DTC will consider downturn and upturn capacities
required.

3 DTC VIP IMPLEMENTATION

3.1 Workshop
DTC VIP will be conducted as a formal workshop and is scheduled for June 23, 2014. The
workshop will be held in FEED dedicated office of in , . Should
additional time be required, the workshop might be extended into the following day.

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 6 of 9

3.2 Representation and Facilitation

Workshop participants will involve representatives from FEED Team and
Project Directorate. Representation from both sides will include Project Management and
Engineering disciplines. and Engineering Managers will nominate specific
participants discipline-wise, while keeping in mind the optimum number of representatives to
ensure efficient and productive review. Operations function representatives will be also
invited to provide inputs into design to capacity considerations from their respective perspective.
will involve an internal Worley Parsons expert with corresponding background to facilitate
the workshop and ensure “cold eyes” review.

3.3 Methodology
Main inputs for DTC workshop are:
• PFDs • BODs
• UFDs • BEDD
• Sparing Philosophy • Process Design Criteria
• Control Philosophy

At the beginning of the DTC, workshop agenda and objectives should be clearly stated and agreed
by all participants.
DTC workshop considerations at Project, system and equipment levels should be guided by the
sequence below.
Stage 1:
1. List all significant equipment items i.e. mechanical, electrical, control system, structures
2. List all margins on product specifications
3. List feed composition to the facility
4. List potential feed composition to facility
Stage 2:
5. List design margins used or proposed, moving from Project Design Basis to final Plant /
Equipment specification
6. List design margins for each train
7. List design conditions as specified in the Project Design Basis (temperature and pressure)
8. Identify capacity commesurate with upstream and downstream processes
9. Identify capacity commesurate with other -2 facilities
Stage 3:
10. List reference design margins considered to be appropriate i.e. those as specified by
Customer Standards and / or Standard Industry practice.
11. Evaluate the effects of coincident design cases and choose appropriate load scenarios
12. Evaluate influence of operations on the design margin used (assuming deterioration of
equipment before maintenance/cleaning, particularly for heat exchangers, filters, turbines
etc.)
13. Consider risk mitigation as a result of margin vs. investment CAPEX
14. Shortlist those equipment items for which the design margins used or proposed appear to be
excessive. List action items in terms of follow up, e.g. potential re-sizing / re-costing,
updating Project design documentation, etc.

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 7 of 9

3.4 Recording Findings and Action Plan/Tracker

Recording of Design to Capacity workshop discussions will be facilitated by using forms in
Annex 1.
A separate Action Plan/Tracker for DTC VIP will be prepared listing the actions identified, dates
required and those responsible for their execution (PIC).
DTC workshop proceedings will be signed off by and Project Managers as part of the
DTC VIP Minutes of the Meeting, and they will also form an integral part of DTC VIP Report,
referred to in the following section.

4 DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP CLOSE OUT

Upon completion of the DTC VIP and closing out actions from the Action Tracker, a separate report
will be prepared by outlining main items, which include, but are not to the
following:
1. Brief Project description, including FEED
2. General description of the DTC VIP
3. DTC Project level analysis
4. DTC systems level analysis
5. DTC equipment level analysis
6. Impact on design
7. Value gains from DTC VIP in terms of cost/flexibility/operability improvements
8. Attachments comprised of:
a. DTC workshop proceedings
b. Design to Capacity VIP Action Plan/Tracker with actions close out status

A brief outline of the DTC VIP will also be included in the VIPs Report to be issued as part of
FEED deliverables by .

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 8 of 9

ANNEX 1

DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP FACILITATION FORMS

1. Setting DTC Workshop Objectives

Design to Capacity Workshop

Project Title:
Phase:

Date:
Venue:

Meeting Objective:
1
2
3
4
5

Desired Outcomes:
1
2
3
4
5

2. DTC Project Level

Design to Capacity Workshop

Project Title:

Project Level Analysis

OVERALL PROCESS Comments/Rationale
Design Capacity
Design Allowance
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required
Actions

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 -2 ( )
Project DEFINE Phase Design to Capacity VIP Procedure Rev.: 00 Status: IFI
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152- L-00-000-PM-PP-00004 Page: Page 9 of 9

3. DTC Systems and Equipment Level

Design to Capacity Workshop

Project Title:

System Level Analysis

System: Comments/Rationale
PFD No.
Design Capacity
Design Allowance
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required
Actions

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Equipment item 1
Equipment item 2
Equipment item 3
Equipment item 4
Equipment item 5
Equipment item 6
Actions

4. Action Plan
Design to Capacity Workshop - Action Plan

Project Title:

No Action Plan PIC Due Date Status

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Uncontrolled copy, if printed or saved

 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 21 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 2 DESIGN TO CAPACITY WORSHOP ATTENDANCE

SHEET

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 22 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

Workshop Attendance
Attendee Company Position/Role
Gd Suryanam PMS
Akbar Ali Process
Farid Zaynullov NNP Lead Spec
Maxim Demin NNP
Hristo Georgieu BNP
Sunil Nair Lead Project Engineer
Manikandan N Process
Kumaraguru Process
Vyacheslav Petrov Engineering Systems
Manager
Karashash Salakhova Senior Oil Treat Engineer
Ruslan Lekerov Central Engineering
Philip Jones HSE Engineer
Romulo Osoris Delivery Manager
Colin Foster Engineering Manager
Maxim Margert DPD
Kallibek Jarimbetov PA
Marod Mirsaidov Project Assurance
Natalia Gorbatyuk
Tom Cuthbert WorleyParsons Project Manager
Nathan Smith WorleyParsons Process
Nagendra Singh WorleyParsons Mechanical/Lead Static
Basuden Gupta WorleyParsons Mechanical/Static &
Packages
Santosh Vaidya WorleyParsons Mechanical/Rotating
Steve Henzell WorleyParsons Facilitator

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 23 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 3 DESIGN TO CAPACITY PRESENTATION

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
Value Improving Practice
Design to Capacity Workshop

23 June 2014
Agenda
No Activity PIC
Greeting:
1 PMT
- Introduction
2 Project Overview, include CFQ PMT
3 OneWay moment Facilitator
Set meeting objective and expectation
4 - R&R, Facilitator
- Ground Meeting, etc.
5 DTC Process Overview Facilitator
6 Review updated PFDs PMT
7 DTC - Equipment of System 1 All
8 DTC - Equipment of System 2 All
9 DTC - Equipment of System 3 All
10 DTC - Equipment of System 4 All
11 DTC - Equipment of System 5 All
Wrap-Up:
- Review outstanding issues
12 - Assign task Facilitator
- Next steps
- Plus/Delta
13 Adjourn Facilitator
 Integrity Management Framework

Elements

1. Leadership and Governance

2. Risk Management
3. Caring for our People & the Environment
4. Selection and Competency
5. Working with Our Customers
6. Engineering
7. Working with the Supply Chain
8. Field Activities
9. Management of Change
10. Critical Incident Avoidance, Response and
Recovery
11. Incident and Behavior Analysis
12. Assessment and Improvement

3
Amine Stripper Reboilers
AX903 Bundle Replacement
Replacement Bundle

u SAF2205 (duplex) stainless steel tubes specified

for 1990 replacement
u 1990 bundle still in service
Design to Capacity Case Studies
Undersized
Oversized
Workshop Objectives
Design to Capacity Workshop

u Ensure that design margins are aligned with Project

Drivers and facility development plans.
u DtC should specifically take into account the
required flexibility of process facilities, primarily the
GTP, to be able to accommodate subsurface
uncertainties with regards to fluid composition, and
H2S content in particular
u Goals
§ Early alignment between a project’s business, technical,
and manufacturing representatives on the most
appropriate level of plant flexibility and overcapacity
§ Save project capital by helping designers fully understand
the operability of every process step and equipment item.
Design to Capacity Workshop

u The rationale behind carrying out the Design to

Capacity VIP is that often systems are designed
with a degree of conservatism, or safety factor,
in order to ensure that the plant will operate at its
nameplate capacity, and that probability of
encountering operational problems in the future
is reduced.
u The key question to be answered is the cost of
the increased assurance warranted?
Sources of Design Margin

u Basis of Design
u Basic Engineering Design Data
u Process Design Criteria
§ Corporate design guides
§ Industry standards
u Sparing Philosophy/Availability
u Control Philosophy
u Equipment specifications
u Contracting basis
Methodology

Stage 1:
u List all margins on product specifications
u List feed composition to the facility
u List potential feed composition to facility
u List all significant equipment items i.e. mechanical, electrical,
control system, structures
Stage 2:
u List design margins used or proposed, moving from Project
Design Basis to final Plant / Equipment specification
u List design margins for each train
u List design conditions as specified in the Project Design Basis
(temperature and pressure)
u Identify capacity commensurate with upstream and
downstream processes
u Identify capacity commensurate with other -2
facilities
Methodology

Stage 3:
u List reference design margins considered to be
appropriate i.e. those as specified by Customer
Standards and / or Standard Industry practice.
u Evaluate the effects of coincident design cases and
choose appropriate load scenarios
u Evaluate influence of operations on the design margin
used (assuming deterioration of equipment before
maintenance/cleaning, particularly for heat exchangers,
filters, turbines etc.)
u Consider risk mitigation as a result of margin vs.
investment CAPEX
u Shortlist those equipment items for which the design
margins used or proposed appear to be excessive.
u List action items in terms of follow up, e.g. potential re-
sizing / re-costing, updating Project design
documentation, etc
Basis of Design
BoD Sources of Design Margin

u Feed streams
§ Flowrates of primary and associated streams
§ Composition
§ Impurities
§ Physical properties
u Product streams
§ Product qualities (RVP, dew points, etc)
§ Physical properties
u Facility performance
§ Availability
u Future provisions (if any)
Performance Requirements

u The success of the project depends

mainly upon the availability, simplicity and
flexibility of the facility which is mainly dependent
on the avoidance of failure of critical equipment
and systems.
u This could be achieved by having proper sparing
and maintenance philosophies in place.
u Facilities shall be designed in a manner that
planned shutdown shall not cause loss of
production greater than that already associated
with the shutdown of that equipment.
Production Profiles – BoD Figure 5.1.1.
Design Capacity – BoD Section 3.5

u The target plateau production from

facility shall be 650 MBOPD of export Crude Oil.
u The facility shall be designed with a plant
availability factor of 0.95.
u facility shall be designed for a
minimum turndown of 40 %.
 Gas Composition – BoD Table 5.2

- -
13,14 23,148 203 0,178 Average
S.No Component (low H2S) (High H2S) Mole %
Mole % Mole %

1 Nitrogen (N2) 0.36 0.62 0.43

2 Hydrogen sulphide (H2S) 1.84 8.12 3.64
3 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 5.14 6.77 5.61
4 Methane (nC1) 62.68 46.5 58.06
5 Ethane (nC2) 13.78 16.05 14.42
6 Propane (nC3) 9.29 12.15 10.11
7 i -Butane (iC4) 1.16 1.38 1.22
8 n -Butane (nC4) 3.35 4.7 3.73
9 i -Pentane (iC5) 0.72 1.02 0.81
10 n - Pentane (nC5) 0.89 1.36 1.02
11 Hexanes (C6) 0.55 0.94 0.66
12 Heptanes (C7) 0.2 0.32 0.24
13 Octanes (C8) 0.04 0.05 0.04
Gas Content (m3/m3 ) 148.44 91.29 132.11
Plant Availability

u Required plant availability is 0.95 for

facility.
u It is defined as follows
A = [(X – x)/X] = 0.95
§ Where A = Plant Availability factor
§ X= Available time in a year= 365 days = 8760 hours
§ x = Hours of production lost due to outage,
maintenance, scheduled and unscheduled downtime
etc
Product Streams – Crude Oil

u Table 6-1: Crude Oil Product Specification

Component Unit Specification

H2S ppmv <50

psi 6.3 to 6.5

Reid Vapor Pressure [RVP@38ºC]
(kPa) (42.8 to 44.2)

lb/1000 bbls <10

Salt Content
(mg/L) (<28.5)

Water Content vol-% <0.15

Bottom Sediments and Water [BS&W] vol-% <0.5

Product Streams – Natural Gas

u Table 6-2: Sales Gas Product Specification

Description Unit Specification

Water Dew Point @ 70 bara °C -12

Hydrocarbon Dew Point @ 70 bara °C -8

H2S ppmv <4.5

RSH ppmv <15

CO2 vol-% <2.5

Product Streams – LPG

u Table 6-3: LPG Product Specification

Description Unit Specification

psia 116
Reid Vapor Pressure [RVP] - Summer
(kPa abs.) (800)

psia 145
Reid Vapor Pressure [RVP] – Winter
(kPa abs) (1000)

Ethane vol-% <0.6

C5+ vol-% <2.0

Total Sulfur mg / Nm3 <100

Water Content vol-% 0 (Free Water)

Equipment Design Margins
u PROCESS DESIGN CRITERIA
§ 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DC-12001_B
Table 3-1: Equipment Design Margin
Equipment Design Margin
Heat Exchangers & Air 10% margin (including flow, area, duty, and in addition to
coolers fouling factors)

Condenser & Reboiler 20% on margin (including flow, area, duty, and in addition
to fouling factors)

0% for intermittent/recirculation service

10% on flow for continuous service

Pumps 20% on flow for reflux

20% on pipeline length or total pressure drop
No design margin shall be added to pump head, since the
flow margins result in corresponding head margins.

Compressors 10% on flow

Tanks (including Mounded Tanks will be sized for the specified hold-up time between
Storage Bullets) high and low alarm liquid levels for the design flow rate
Separators and Columns 10% on flow (in addition to foaming factors)
Fired Heaters 10% on normal duty (in addition to fouling factors)
Miscellaneous Equipment 10% on flow / duty
As per above criteria for individual equipment. Nil total
Packaged Items package design margin shall be added on H&MB sizing
case.
Heat Exchangers

u In general, the following minimum approach

temperatures (hot outlet – cold inlet) are
recommended for the design of heat
exchangers:
§ Shell and Tube exchangers 10°C
§ Air cooled exchangers 10°C
Minimum process outlet temperature is considered
56°C based on air inlet temperature of 46°C
§ Refrigerant Chiller 6°C
Heat Exchangers

Service m2 °C / kW Service m2 °C / kW
Raw Gas 0.20 Hot Crude Oil 0.70
Sales Gas 0.15 Desalted Oil 0.53
Fuel Gas 0.20 Stabilized Oil 0.53
LPG 0.20 Chilled Water 0.17
Propane 0.15 Potable Water 0.17
Lean / Rich Amine 0.40 Boiler Feed 0.17
Glycol 0.35 Superheated Steam 0.09
Process Water 0.35 Formation Water 0.53
Stripped Water 0.35 Cooling Water 0.35

Raw Feed Condensate 0.35 Hot Oil 0.34

Stabilized 0.20 Compressed Air 0.18

Condensates

Cold Crude Oil 0.53 Nitrogen 0.09

Distillation Columns

Service System Factor

Glycol Contactor 0.50

Glycol Regenerator 0.65
H2S Stripper 0.85
Demethanizer 0.85
Deethanizer 0.85
Debutanizer 0.90
Depropanizer 0.90
Amine Gas contactor 0.80
Amine Regenerator 0.85
 Piping
Velocity, Max Pressure Drop, Velocity, Max Pressure Drop,
Type of Service Type of Service
m/s bar/100 m m/s bar/100 m
General Recommendation for
Hydrocarbons
Pump Discharge
Liquid Density, kg/m3
(Hydrocarbon or Water)
1600
Service Diameter, mm
1.5-2.4 1.1 1.8 0.23-0.35
800
<100
2-3 0.9 2.5 0.23-0.35
320
100
3-5 0.3 3.0 0.23-0.35
150
4.3 0.35-0.45
200
Pump Suction - Boiling Liquid 5.0 0.35-0.45
>200
(Hydrocarbon or Water)
(Notes-2, 3)
Service Diameter, mm 1 0.01-0.05 Liquid from Condenser 1-2 0.1
<100 1.4 0.01-0.05 Refrigeration Lines 0.6-1.2 0.09
100 1.5 0.01-0.06
150 1.8 0.02-0.06 Gravity Rundown Lines 1-2.5 0.03
200 1.8 0.02-0.07 Liquid Feed to Towers 1.2-2 0.06-0.1
>200
Liquids to Reboilers 0.9-1.8 0.02-0.06
Pump Suction - Sub-cooled Lean Amine (CS pipe)
Liquid (Hydrocarbon or Water)
2.5
Rich Amine (Note-1)
(Note-2)
Service Diameter, mm 1 0.05-0.14
<100 1.4 0.05-0.14
100 1.5 0.05-0.14
150 1.8 0.11-0.23
200 1.8 0.11-0.23
>200
 Single Phase Vapour Line Sizing

Operating Pressure, ρv2 (max) Pressure Drop, Maximum

Bara kg/m/s2 bar/100m Velocity, m/s

General Recommendation
<3.5 0.01-0.03
3.5-10 0.04-0.07
10-40 0.07-0.11
40-150 0.11-0.27

>150 0.2% of operating

pressure
Compressor Lines
0-5 0.034
5-10 0.068
10-15 0.113
15-35 0.113
>35 0.113
Suction 20
Discharge 30
Anti-surge recycle 75
Production Systems
Block Flow Diagram
Simplified Block Flow Diagram
40
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 24 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 4 SYSTEM BLOCK DIAGRAM

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 25 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 5 DESIGN MARGIN TABLE

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 Margin
System Downtime Process GOR Flow Distribution Other Specification Comment
Allowance Margin Uncertainty Allowance Allowance Allowance

Flowlines N/A Standardised on 6" (no margin applicable)

Wellpads N/A Standardised designs for 6, 8 and 10 well manifolds
Trunklines N/A Specific optimisation has selected trunkline sizes

Inlet Manifold & Slug Catcher 5% 10% 0% 0% 0% Specific review of surge volume allowance required

Oil Separator 5% 10% 0% 0% 0%

Oil Dehydration & Desalting 5% 10% 0% 0% 0% Water-in-oil Water-in-oil inlet specification of 2 vol% provides appropriate design
allowance
Oil Stabilisation 5% 10% 0% 0% 0% Crude RVP
Oil Storage - On Spec 5% 10% 0% 0% 0% Number of days storage sets design margin
Oil Export Pumps 5% 10% 0% 0% HOLD Review requirement for "catch-up" after an export outage
Oil Fiscal Metering 5% 10% 0% 0% HOLD
Oil Storage - Off Spec 5% 10% 0% 0% 0%

Produced Water Handling 5% 10% 0% 0% 0% Water handling capacity will be installed in stages as demand increases -
design margin approach not strictly appropriate

Raw Gas Compression 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Range in MW of gas compositions to be considered

Raw Gas Sweetening Unit 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Dependent on technology selection
Solvent Regeneration 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Dependent on technology selection
Gas Dehydration & Mercaptan Removal 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Mercaptan load Assume 100% of mercaptan slips forward from Raw Gas Sweetening
Unit
Regeneration Gas Sweetening Unit 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Cyclic loading of acid gas components, depending on technology
selection
Gas Dewpoint Conditioning 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% HC Dewpoint
Export Gas Compression 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% Range in MW of gas compositions to be considered
Export Gas Fiscal Metering 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%
Gas Pipeline to Tie-in 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%

De-ethaniser 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%

De-propaniser 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% LPG RVP
De-butaniser 5% 10% 15% 0% 0% C5+ in LPG
LPG Storage 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%
LPG Pumping 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%
LPG Fiscal Metering 5% 10% 15% 0% 0%

Acid Gas Enrichment Unit Allowances to be reviewed following technology selection

Sulphur Recovery Unit & Tail Gas Treatment Design margins to be applied and then capacity to process a range of
Unit sour components to be evaluated
Sulphur Granulation System
 FORMATION DEVELOPMENT FEED
WORLEYPARSONS
2 PROJECT,
Doc. title DESIGN TO CAPACITY VIP WORKSHOP REPORT Rev.: 00 Status: AFU
COMPANY No.: 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001
Page: 26 of 26
Contractor No.: N/A

APPENDIX 6 DESIGN TO CAPACITY ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS

8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-RP-12001_00.docx
Uncontrolled copy, if printed.
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )
Phase: Project Define Phase

Date: 23-Jun-14
Venue: Project Meeting Room

Meeting Objective:
1 Ensure that design margins are aligned with Project Drivers and facility development plans.
Achieve early alignment between the project’s business, technical, and manufacturing representatives
2 on the most appropriate level of plant flexibility and overcapacity
Save project capital by helping designers fully understand the operability of every process step and
3 equipment item.
4
5

Desired Outcomes:
3
4
5

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа, возможно, неактуальна. Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП.
© 2014. . All rights reserved.
 Design to Capacity Workshop - List of Participants
Project Title: -2 ( )
Phase: Project Define Phase

No Name Role
1 Gd Suryanam PMS
2 Akbar Ali Process
3 Farid Zaynullov NNP Lead Spec
4 Maxim Demin NNP
5 Hristo Georgieu BNP
6 Sunil Nair Lead Project Engineer
7 Manikandan N Process
8 Kumaraguru Process
9 Vyacheslav Petrov Engineering Systems Manager
10 Karashash Salakhova Senior Oil Treat Engineer
13 Romulo Osoris Delivery Manager
14 Colin Foster Engineering Manager
15 Maxim Margert DPD
16 Kallibek Jarimbetov PA
17 Marod Mirsaidov Project Assurance
18 Natalia Gorbatyuk
19 Tom Cuthbert WorleyParsons Project Manager
20 Nathan Smith WorleyParsons Process
21 Nagendra Singh WorleyParsons Mechanical/Lead Static
22 Basuden Gupta WorleyParsons Mechanical/Static & Packages
23 Santosh Vaidya WorleyParsons Mechanical/Rotating
24 Steve Henzell WorleyParsons Facilitator
25
26
27
28
29
30

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

Project Level Analysis

OVERALL PROCESS Comments/Rationale
Design Capacity 650 mbpd Annual average target oil production rate
Design Allowance 15% Availability 5% and process margin 10%
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required 40% Applies to each train of equipment
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: Oil Treatment Plant Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity 108.3 mbpd 6 equal trains to process crude oil
Design Allowance 15% Availability allowance 5% plus process margin 10% - no flow imbalance margin
Upturn Capacity Required Specific allowance required for gas processing - see gas section
Downturn Capacity Required 40% Each train to be capable of operating at 40% of design flowrate
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Air Cooled Exchangers 46°C Design air temperature
Pumps Varies depending on service, as per design guideline
Distillation column 6.3 to 6.5 psi RVP pressure
Equipment name 6
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: Gas Treatment Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity 158.4 m3/m3 GOR
Design Allowance 30% Availability 5%, process margin 10%, GOR uncertainty 15%
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required 40% of design capacity
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Air Cooled Exchangers 46°C Design air temperature
Pumps Varies depending on service, as per design guideline
HC Dewpointing 3°C margin on specification
Gas Composition Average gas properties in BOD, adjusted for design GOR
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: Acid Gas Treating Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity
Design Allowance HOLD - to be reviewed following technology selection
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Equipment name 3
Equipment name 4
Equipment name 5
Equipment name 6
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: Crude Gathering System Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity N/A
Design Allowance N/A
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Trunklines Subject to specific review
Slugcatcher Subject to specific review
Equipment name 5
Equipment name 6
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: Produced Water Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity N/A
Design Allowance 15% Availability 5%, process margin 10%
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required N/A
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
Equipment name 3 is reached
Equipment name 4
Equipment name 5
Equipment name 6
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop
Project Title: -2 ( )

System Level Analysis

System: LPG Fractionation & Storage Comments/Rationale
PFD No. BFD 8015-0152-WP05-00-000-PC-DM-12001
Design Capacity H&MB Derived from H&MB using design oil flowrate, design GOR and average comp
Design Allowance 30% Availability 5%, process margin 10%, GOR uncertainty 15%
Upturn Capacity Required
Downturn Capacity Required
Actions See "Action Item" Tab

Equipment Level Analysis

Sparing Design Design
Equipment Comments/Rationale
Req. Capacity Allowance
LPG Bullets TBA Dependent on availability analysis
Equipment name 4
Equipment name 5
Equipment name 6
Actions See "Action item" Tab

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа возможно неактуальна Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП
 Design to Capacity Workshop - Action Plan
Project Title: -2 ( )

No Action Plan PIC Due Date Status

Clarify how the turndown target will be achieved in the WorleyParsons
1
gas processing train Process Open
The stabilized crude oil RVP specification needs to be
clarified. It is expressed as a range of values and
2
implies that the RVP must lie within this range. WorleyParsons
WorleyParsons to raise a TQ for clarification Process Open
Review the fouling factors for heat exchangers
3 including comparing them to common industry practice WorleyParsons
such as TEMA Process Open
Review the distillation column system factors. Add a
4 system factor for crude stabilizer service. Review WorleyParsons
system factors for amine columns. Process Open
Document the different heat exchanger design approach
5 temperatures that have been used for different pieces of WorleyParsons
equipment. Process Open

6 Incorporate line sizing guidelines for multi-phase lines WorleyParsons

into the Process Design Criteria Process Open
Review design margins for the Gas Sweetening Section
7 of the plant once the technology selection has been WorleyParsons
finalized. Process Open
8
9
10

Uncontrolled when printed or saved. Please refer to Portal for the latest version.
Распечатанная или сохраненная версия документа, возможно, неактуальна. Последняя версия размещена на портале ИСУП.
© 2014. . All rights reserved.