Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 26 views

    Caligulas Economic Impact

    Uploaded by

    bog mac
    Caligula's rule from 37 to 41 AD negatively impacted the Roman economy through his excessive spending on construction projects and minting of coins. His building projects, including a bridge and temple construction, required new taxes and property confiscation, straining the economy and causing inflation. Additionally, minting coins with his own image to fund his lavish lifestyle led to currency debasement and a decline in money's value. While the full extent is unclear, Caligula's actions undoubtedly damaged the Roman economic situation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Caligulas Economic Impact

    Uploaded by

    bog mac
    26 views1 page
    Caligula's rule from 37 to 41 AD negatively impacted the Roman economy through his excessive spending on construction projects and minting of coins. His building projects, including a bridge and temple construction, required new taxes and property confiscation, straining the economy and causing inflation. Additionally, minting coins with his own image to fund his lavish lifestyle led to currency debasement and a decline in money's value. While the full extent is unclear, Caligula's actions undoubtedly damaged the Roman economic situation.

    Original Description:

    How Caligula's rule impacted the economy of the roman empire

    Original Title

    caligulas economic impact

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Caligula's rule from 37 to 41 AD negatively impacted the Roman economy through his excessive spending on construction projects and minting of coins. His building projects, including a bridge and temple construction, required new taxes and property confiscation, straining the economy and causing inflation. Additionally, minting coins with his own image to fund his lavish lifestyle led to currency debasement and a decline in money's value. While the full extent is unclear, Caligula's actions undoubtedly damaged the Roman economic situation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    26 views1 page

    Caligulas Economic Impact

    Uploaded by

    bog mac
    Caligula's rule from 37 to 41 AD negatively impacted the Roman economy through his excessive spending on construction projects and minting of coins. His building projects, including a bridge and temple construction, required new taxes and property confiscation, straining the economy and causing inflation. Additionally, minting coins with his own image to fund his lavish lifestyle led to currency debasement and a decline in money's value. While the full extent is unclear, Caligula's actions undoubtedly damaged the Roman economic situation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    The rule of Caligula, the Roman Emperor from 37 to 41 AD, is known for its extravagance and excess,

    which had a significant impact on the Roman economy. Caligula's spending on building projects,
    including the construction of a bridge of boats across the Bay of Naples and the completion of the
    Temple of Augustus and Rome, put a strain on the economy and led to increased taxes and inflation.
    Additionally, Caligula's decision to mint large numbers of coins with his own image on them, in order to
    fund his extravagant lifestyle, led to a debasement of the currency.

    One of the major economic impacts of Caligula's rule was his excessive spending on building projects.
    According to Anthony A. Barrett in his book "Caligula: The Corruption of Power", the emperor's building
    projects were "enormously expensive" and required the "imposition of new taxes and the confiscation
    of property" (Barrett, 1989, p. 91). This put a strain on the economy and led to increased taxes and
    inflation.

    Another significant impact of Caligula's rule on the Roman economy was his decision to mint large
    numbers of coins with his own image on them. According to Aloys Winterling in his book "Caligula: A
    Biography", this decision was made in order to fund Caligula's extravagant lifestyle and to "increase his
    own prestige" (Winterling, 2017, p. 84). However, this led to a debasement of the currency, as the new
    coins were made of less valuable metals. This had a negative impact on the economy and led to a
    decline in the value of money.

    It is important to note that while Caligula's actions did have a negative impact on the Roman economy, it
    is not entirely clear to what extent it was due to his rule and how much was already troubled during the
    Tiberius rule and the political instability at the time. The Roman economy was complex and
    multifaceted, and it is difficult to attribute specific causes to specific effects.

    In conclusion, the rule of Caligula had a significant impact on the Roman economy due to his extravagant
    spending on building projects and his decision to mint large numbers of coins with his own image on
    them. These actions led to increased taxes and inflation, and a debasement of the currency. While it is
    difficult to determine the specific extent of the impact of Caligula's rule on the Roman economy, it is
    clear that his actions had a negative effect.

    Bibliography

    Barrett, A. A. (1989). Caligula: The Corruption of Power. London: Routledge.

    Winterling, A. (2017). Caligula: A Biography. Berkeley: University of California Press

    You might also like