GOVT 3053 03 2016 The Cold War and Its Aftermath - Part 1
GOVT 3053 03 2016 The Cold War and Its Aftermath - Part 1
GOVT 3053 03 2016 The Cold War and Its Aftermath - Part 1
ST. AUGUSTINE
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE
1/49
Course content
Nine Inter-Related Topics:
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS:
• The Inter-Paradigm debates
↓
HOW THE PRESENT INTERNATIONAL ORDER WAS CONSTRUCTED:
• The Theoretical Evolution of International Politics
• The Cold War and Its Aftermath
↓
HOW THE PRESENT INTERNATIONAL ORDER WORKS*:
• Diplomacy in International Politics
*You should take courses in Int. Law, Int. Political Economy and Strategic Studies
↓
HOW THE PRESENT INTERNATIONAL ORDER IS CHALLENGED:
STRUCTURAL POLITICAL-STRATEGIC
(SOCIAL-ECONOMIC) CHALLENGES
CHALLENGES • The War on Terror
• Globalization and Development • Politics of the Middle East
• The Network Society • China: Challenging Unipolarity
2/49
READINGS:
Frédéric Bozo et al (Eds.) Europe and the End of the Cold War: A reappraisal. New York: Routlege, 2008.
Gilbert M. Joseph and In from the Cold: Latin America’s new encounter with
Daniela Spenser the Cold War. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.
Herb Addo “A third world perspective on global justice and New World order.” In Restructuring for World Peace: On the threshold of
the twenty-first century. Edited by K. Tehranian & M Tehranian. New Jersey: Hampton Press, 1992 pp 256-281.
Ian Clark The Post-Cold War Order: The Spoils of Peace. Oxford University Press, 2002.
I. Wallerstein “The Cold War and the Third World.” In After Liberalism. New York: New Press, 1995. (Chapter One) and pp 10-24
I. Wallerstein “World System after the cold war.” Journal of Peace Research 30, no.: 1, 1993 pp 1-6.
J. Ihonubere “The third word and the New World Order in the 1990s.” Futures 24, No. 10, 1992 pp 987-1002.
Joseph S Nye “What new World Order?” Foreign Affairs Vol. 71, No.2 Spring 1992.
Joseph S. Nye Understanding international conflicts: an introduction to theory and history. New York : Pearson Longman, 2009.
Rashid Khalidi Sowing Crisis: The Cold War and American Dominance in the Middle East. Boston: Beacon Press, 2009.
Robert Harvey Global Disorder. Carroll & Graf Publishers; Reprint edition (January 1, 2004)
S David “Why the Third World Still Matter” International Security 17.3 (1992/93) pp 127-59.
Stephen Gill Power and resistance in the new world order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008
+
READING at Hazar Denizin Universitesi (Caspian Sea University):
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B1_Z5ACd6MBPN056Ykx6QVE5c1E?usp=sharing
Juliet Kaarbo and James Lee Ray, Global Politics (2011), Ch. 3 The Modern Era, pp.53-89.
3/49
The Cold War
1947-1989
indirect US-USSR conflict = no direct fighting
primarily 'ideological war'
(Communism vs. Capitalism)
• 1945 Central and Eastern Europe → • US = atomic bomb; informed UK, left the
Soviet satellite nations = Soviet Soviets out
domination + buffer zone
• US → spread democracy, liberty, equality
• Soviet Union → spread communism
4/49
The Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, 1939 (Nazi Germany-USSR non-aggression pact)
5/49
German and Soviet forces meet in central Poland after Common parade of Wehrmacht
invading its Western and Eastern parts, respectively and Red Army in Brest at the
(1939) end of the Invasion of Poland. At
the center Major General Heinz
Guderian and Brigadier Semyon
Krivoshein
6/49
David Low's cartoon, published in the Evening Standard on 20 September 1939, shows
Hitler greeting Stalin, following their joint invasion of Poland, with the words, "The scum
of the earth, I believe?". To which Stalin replies, "The bloody assassin of the workers, I
presume?"
7/49
1939-1945 WWII
8/49
Conflicting postwar goals
American Goals Soviet Goals
liberated European nations • rebuild Europe → help the Soviet Union
↓ recover from WWII huge losses
• American values = democracy and • establish satellite nations under Soviet
economic opportunities domination
• strong capitalist economies = markets for • spread of communism
American products
10/49
Marshall Plan expenditures by country
11/49
Berlin blockade
Berlin
13/49
NATO and the Warsaw Pact
14/49
NATO and the Warsaw Pact European member states
15/49
NATO and Warsaw Pact forces in Europe (1973)
16/49
The Warsaw Pact
17/49
18/49
VIDEO : Warsaw Pact troops on attack http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9YUaKynXy8
Soviet Military Strategy
The goal of Soviet military strategy in Europe is a nuclear-war fighting edge in the European theater. At the same
quick victory over NATO in a nonnuclear war. The Soviet time, the Soviet Union made NATO's dependence on nuclear
Union would attempt to defeat NATO decisively before its weapons less tenable by issuing Warsaw Pact proposals for
political and military command structure could consult and mutual no-first-use pledges and the establishment of nuclear-free
decide how to respond to an attack. Under this strategy, zones.
success would hinge on inflicting a rapid succession of The Soviet plan for winning a conventional war quickly to
defeats on NATO to break its will to fight, knock some of its preclude the possibility of a nuclear response by NATO and the
member states out of the war, and cause the collapse of the United States was based on the deep-strike concept Soviet
Western alliance. A quick victory would also keep the United military theoreticians first proposed in the 1930s. After 1972 the
States from escalating the conflict to the nuclear level by Soviet Army put deep strike into practice in annual joint Warsaw
making retaliation against the Soviet Union futile. A rapid Pact exercises, including "Brotherhood-in-Arms," "Union,"
defeat of NATO would preempt the mobilization of its "Friendship," "West," and "Shield." Deep strike would carry an
superior industrial and economic resources, as well as attack behind the front lines of battle, far into NATO's rear areas.
reinforcement from the United States, which would enable The Soviet Union would launch simultaneous missile and air
NATO to prevail in a longer war. Most significant, in a strikes against vital NATO installations to disrupt or destroy the
strictly conventional war the Soviet Union could conceivably Western alliance's early warning surveillance systems, command
capture its objective, the economic potential of Western and communications network, and nuclear delivery systems.
Europe, relatively intact. Following this initial strike, the modern-day successor of the
In the 1970s, Soviet nuclear force developments World War II-era Soviet mobile group formations, generated out
increased the likelihood that a European war would remain on of the SGFs in Eastern Europe, would break through and encircle
the conventional level. By matching the United States in NATO's prepared defenses in order to isolate its forward forces
intercontinental ballistic missiles and adding intermediate- from reinforcement. Consisting of two or more tank and
range SS-20s to its nuclear forces, the Soviet Union undercut motorized rifle divisions, army-level mobile groups would also
NATO's option to employ nuclear weapons to avoid defeat in overrun important NATO objectives behind the front lines to
a conventional war. After the United States neutralized the facilitate the advance of Soviet follow-on forces, which would
Soviet SS-20 IRBM advantage by deploying Pershing II and cross NSWP territory from the westernmost Soviet military
cruise missiles, the Soviet Union tried to use its so-called districts.
"counterdeployments" of SS-21 and SS-23 SRBMs to gain a
19/49
Tutorial questions
1. Discuss the evolution of peace and security post 1945.
2. What is the Cold War and how did it affect the global system?
3. “The end of the Cold War caused a shift in the international balance of power”. Analyze
this statement and illustrate your answer using current examples.
4. Is there a new world order? If yes, how is it defined?
49/49