Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Output Uji Hipotesis

    Uploaded by

    Nahrayu
    1) The document provides the results of a univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) examining the effects of learning model (inquiry-based vs direct instruction) and interest level (high vs low) on science learning outcomes. 2) The results showed significant main effects of both learning model and interest level on outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between the two factors. 3) Descriptive statistics are also provided, showing mean outcomes for each combination of learning model and interest level conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Output Uji Hipotesis

    Uploaded by

    Nahrayu
    13 views6 pages
    1) The document provides the results of a univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) examining the effects of learning model (inquiry-based vs direct instruction) and interest level (high vs low) on science learning outcomes. 2) The results showed significant main effects of both learning model and interest level on outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between the two factors. 3) Descriptive statistics are also provided, showing mean outcomes for each combination of learning model and interest level conditions.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The document provides the results of a univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) examining the effects of learning model (inquiry-based vs direct instruction) and interest level (high vs low) on science learning outcomes. 2) The results showed significant main effects of both learning model and interest level on outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between the two factors. 3) Descriptive statistics are also provided, showing mean outcomes for each combination of learning model and interest level conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    13 views6 pages

    Output Uji Hipotesis

    Uploaded by

    Nahrayu
    1) The document provides the results of a univariate analysis of variance (UNIANOVA) examining the effects of learning model (inquiry-based vs direct instruction) and interest level (high vs low) on science learning outcomes. 2) The results showed significant main effects of both learning model and interest level on outcomes, as well as a significant interaction between the two factors. 3) Descriptive statistics are also provided, showing mean outcomes for each combination of learning model and interest level conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    Your temporary usage period for IBM SPSS Statistics will expire in 5056 days.

    UNIANOVA Hasil BY Model Minat


    /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
    /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
    /SAVE=ZRESID
    /CRITERIA=ALPHA(0.05)
    /DESIGN=Model Minat Model*Minat.

    Univariate Analysis of Variance


    [DataSet0]

    Between-Subjects Factors
    Value Label N
    Model Pembelajaran 1 Model 8
    Pembelajaran
    Inquiri
    Terbimbing
    2 Model 8
    Pembelajaran
    Langsung
    Minat Belajar 1 Minat Belajar 8
    Tinggi
    2 Minat Belajar 8
    Rendah

    Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


    Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar IPA
    Type III Sum of
    Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
    a
    Corrected Model 1368.500 3 456.167 39.240 .000

    Intercept 84100.000 1 84100.000 7234.409 .000


    Model 272.250 1 272.250 23.419 .000
    Minat 1024.000 1 1024.000 88.086 .000
    Model * Minat 72.250 1 72.250 6.215 .028
    Error 139.500 12 11.625
    Total 85608.000 16
    Corrected Total 1508.000 15

    a. R Squared = .907 (Adjusted R Squared = .884)

    EXAMINE VARIABLES=ZRE_1
    Page 1
    /PLOT BOXPLOT STEMLEAF NPPLOT
    /COMPARE GROUPS
    /STATISTICS DESCRIPTIVES
    /CINTERVAL 95
    /MISSING LISTWISE
    /NOTOTAL.

    Explore

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Standardized Residual for 16 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 100.0%
    Hasil

    Descriptives
    Statistic Std. Error
    Standardized Residual for Mean .0000 .22361
    Hasil
    95% Confidence Interval for Lower Bound -.4766
    Mean
    Upper Bound .4766
    5% Trimmed Mean .0122
    Median .1466
    Variance .800
    Std. Deviation .89443
    Minimum -1.61
    Maximum 1.39
    Range 3.01
    Interquartile Range 1.06
    Skewness -.375 .564
    Kurtosis -.396 1.091

    Tests of Normality
    a
    Kolmogorov-Smirnov Shapiro-Wilk
    Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
    *
    Standardized Residual for .128 16 .200 .950 16 .488
    Hasil

    *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.


    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

    Page 2
    Standardized Residual for Hasil
    Standardized Residual for Hasil Stem-and-Leaf Plot

    Frequency Stem & Leaf

    2,00 -1 . 56
    1,00 -1 . 0
    ,00 -0 .
    4,00 -0 . 2344
    4,00 0 . 1144
    3,00 0 . 566
    2,00 1 . 33

    Stem width: 1,00


    Each leaf: 1 case(s)

    Normal Q-Q Plot of Standardized Residual for Hasil

    1
    Expected Normal

    -1

    -2

    -3

    -2 -1 0 1 2

    Observed Value

    Page 3
    Detrended Normal Q-Q Plot of Standardized Residual for Hasil

    0.4

    0.2
    Dev from Normal

    0.0000

    -0.2

    -0.4

    -0.6

    -2 -1 0 1 2

    Observed Value

    2.00

    1.00

    .00

    -1.00

    -2.00

    Standardized Residual for Hasil

    UNIANOVA Hasil BY Model Minat


    /METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
    /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
    /PRINT DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY
    Page 4
    /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
    /DESIGN=Model Minat Model*Minat.

    Univariate Analysis of Variance

    Between-Subjects Factors
    Value Label N
    Model Pembelajaran 1 Model 8
    Pembelajaran
    Inquiri
    Terbimbing
    2 Model 8
    Pembelajaran
    Langsung
    Minat Belajar 1 Minat Belajar 8
    Tinggi
    2 Minat Belajar 8
    Rendah

    Descriptive Statistics
    Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar IPA
    Model Pembelajaran Minat Belajar Mean Std. Deviation N
    Model Pembelajaran Inquiri Minat Belajar Tinggi 82.50 4.123 4
    Terbimbing
    Minat Belajar Rendah 70.75 2.872 4
    Total 76.63 7.090 8
    Model Pembelajaran Minat Belajar Tinggi 78.50 1.732 4
    Langsung
    Minat Belajar Rendah 58.25 4.272 4
    Total 68.38 11.237 8
    Total Minat Belajar Tinggi 80.50 3.625 8
    Minat Belajar Rendah 64.50 7.483 8
    Total 72.50 10.027 16

    Page 5
    a,b
    Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variances

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.


    Hasil Belajar IPA Based on Mean .709 3 12 .565
    Based on Median .538 3 12 .665
    Based on Median and with .538 3 6.922 .671
    adjusted df
    Based on trimmed mean .690 3 12 .576
    Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
    a. Dependent variable: Hasil Belajar IPA
    b. Design: Intercept + Model + Minat + Model * Minat

    Tests of Between-Subjects Effects


    Dependent Variable: Hasil Belajar IPA
    Type III Sum of
    Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
    a
    Corrected Model 1368.500 3 456.167 39.240 .000

    Intercept 84100.000 1 84100.000 7234.409 .000


    Model 272.250 1 272.250 23.419 .000
    Minat 1024.000 1 1024.000 88.086 .000
    Model * Minat 72.250 1 72.250 6.215 .028
    Error 139.500 12 11.625
    Total 85608.000 16
    Corrected Total 1508.000 15

    a. R Squared = .907 (Adjusted R Squared = .884)

    Page 6

    You might also like