Leadership Ch1
Leadership Ch1
Leadership Ch1
1. INTRODUCTION TO LEADERSHIP
1.1Leadership Definition
An organization has the greatest chance of being successful when all of the employees work
toward achieving its goals. Since leadership involves the exercise of influence by one person
over others, the supervisors/managers is a critical determinant of organizational success. The
idea of leadership irrespective of different terms used as directing, executing, supervising,
ordering, commanding, etc. is to put into effect the decisions, plan and programs, that have
previously been worked out for achieving the goals of the group.
Leading is the process of establishing direction and influencing others to follow that
direction. It is the process by which one person influences the thoughts, attitudes, and
behaviors of others. Leaders set a direction for the rest of us; they help us see what lies
ahead; they help us visualize what we might achieve; they encourage us and inspire us.
Without leadership a group of human being quickly degenerates into argument and
conflict, because we see things in different ways and lean toward different solutions.
Leadership helps to point us in the same direction and harness our efforts jointly.
Leader’s ability to get other people to do something significant that might not otherwise
do.
Leadership is a dynamic relationship based on mutual influence and common purpose
between leaders and collaborators in which both are moved to higher levels of motivation
and moral development as they affect real, intended change. (Kevin Freiberg and Jackie
Freiberg, 1996).
Leadership is the process of influencing employees to work toward the achievement of
objectives.
A few years ago, 54 scholars from 38 countries reached a consensus that leadership is the
ability to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute to the effectiveness and
success of the organizations of which they are members.
The distinction between leader and leadership is important. The leader is the individual who is
able to exert influence over other people to help achieve group or organizational goals;
leadership is the function or activity this individual performs. Leadership includes/involves many
activities in the manner in which a leader influences actions of subordinates such as:
Leadership and management are not the same. People tend to use the terms manager and leader
interchangeably. However, that usage is not correct. Management and leadership are related but
different concepts. Leadership is one of the five management functions (planning, organizing,
staffing, leading, and controlling). Someone can be a manager without being a true leader. There
are managers –you may know of some-who are not leaders because they do not have the ability
to influence others. There are also good leaders who are not managers. The informal leader, an
According to John P.Kotter in his book, A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from
management (1990), managers must know how to lead as well as manage. Without leading as
well as managing, today’s organizations face the threat of extinction. Management is the process
of setting and achieving the goals of the organization through the function of management. A
manager is hired by the organization and is given formal authority to direct the activity of others
in fulfilling organization goal. Thus, leading is a major part of a manager’s job. Yet a manager
must also plan, organize, staff, and control. Generally speaking, leadership deals with the
interpersonal aspects of a manager’s job, whereas planning, organizing, and controlling deal
with the administrative aspects. Leadership deals with change, inspiration, motivation, and
influence. Management deals more with carrying out the organization’s goals and maintains
equilibrium.
Management produces a degree of predictability and order. Leadership produces change. Kotter
believes that most organizations are under lead and over managed. He sees both strong
leadership and strong management as necessary for optimal organizational effectiveness,
Leadership and management are both important, but they seek to do different things. About 40
years ago Kurt Lewin put it this way. Every organization structures itself to accomplish its goals
in a way that is in tune with or responsive to its environment. Once the efficiency of the
organization is established, people go about simply maintaining the system, assuming that the
environment will stay the same. Management, then, is the main focus because it keeps the
organization going well with little change. But the thing is: the environment for any organization
is always changing. There are always shifts in consumer tastes, social attitudes, society’s culture,
technology, historic events, and so on. The world is not static as we assume. Organizations tend
not to spot these changes quickly, often because of a "management orientation" which is focused
more on "looking in" instead of "looking out". Over time, the organization can become less and
less in tune with or responsive to its environment, creating more and more management
The key point in differentiating between leadership and management is the idea that employees
willingly follow leaders because they want to, not because they have to. Leaders may not possess
the formal power to reward or sanction performance. However, employees give the leader power
by complying with what he or she requests. On the other hand, managers may have to rely on
formal authority to get employees to accomplish goals.
Managers plan, organize, staff, lead and control. They may or may not be effective in influencing
their subordinates or team members to set and achieve goals. Leaders, on the other hand are
involved in single function of management that is leading. Leadership involves creating and
sharing visions, generating strategies to bring visions to realize. Therefore, leaders and managers
are not necessarily the same; it is mainly leading performs only one aspect of management
functions. Managers can be leader because they can perform leading function. But may not be
effective leaders since they may not have enough ability to influence others.
In addition to the above explanations, the following table summarizes some of differences
between management and leadership.
Effective leadership is the process of achieving desired results through people’s willing
participation. The heart of this definition is: desired results (goals), through people, and willing
participation-people willingly follow leaders because they want them.
When leaders are effective, the influence they exert over others helps a group or organization
achieve its performance goals when leaders are ineffective, their influence does not contribute to,
and often detracts from goal attainment.
Warren Bennis, who devoted decades to researching leadership issues, concludes that virtually
all leaders of effective groups share four characteristics in common:
1. They provide direction and meaning to the people they are leading. This means they
remind people what is important and why what they are doing makes important
difference.
2. They generate trust.
3. They favor action and risk taking. That is, they are proactive and willing to risk failing in
order to succeed.
4. They are surveyors of hope. In both tangible and symbolic ways they reinforce the notion
that success will be attained.
Passion: An effective leader is a person with a passion for a cause that is larger than they are.
Someone with a dream and a vision that will better society or at least some portion of it. Without
passion, a leader will not make the necessary courageous and difficult decisions and carry them
into action. This is not to imply that all decisions are of this nature. But you can be sure, some of
them will be. The leader without a passion for a cause will duck.
Holder of Values: Leadership implies values. A leader must have values that are life-giving to
society. It is the only kind of leadership we need. This then also implies values that are
embedded in respect for others. So, often we think of people skills or caring about people as
being “warm and fuzzy.” A leader can be of varying ‘warmth and fuzziness,” but a leader has to
respect others. You can’t lead without it. Otherwise we are back to manipulation. Respect means
also that one can deal with diversity a critical need for a leader in today’s world probably
always has been, although diversity may have been more subtle in the homogenous societies of
the past.
Vision: This is a bit different than passion, but in other ways it isn’t separable. If one doesn’t
care about a subject, an issue, a system, and then one won’t spend the time thinking about how it
Creativity: One has to try to think out of the box to have good visions and to come up with
effective strategies that will help advance the vision. The need for a sense of humor, it’s a
creative skill that is in great need by leaders.
Intellectual Drive and Knowledge: A leader has to be a student. In general it is hard for a
leader to be around enough other leaders to pick this up just through discussion. A leader has to
be a reader and a learner.
Confidence and Humility Combined: While one can have a great vision and good ideas for
change, and even passion for it, if one isn’t confident, then action will not occur. Without action,
there is no change. Yet, paradoxically, a leader needs to have humility. No matter how creative
and bright one is, often the best ideas and thinking are going to come from someone else. A
leader needs to be able to identify that, have good people around who have these ideas. This
takes humility, or at least lack of egocentricity. The leader is focused on the ends and doesn’t
have to see him/herself always as the conduit or creator of the strategy to get to that end.
Communicator: None of the above assets will work for a leader if she can’t speak or write in a
way to convince others that they should follow along, join the team, and get on board. All the
above gets to the old adage that a leader knows how to do the right thing and a manager knows
how to do things right. But a leader has to be a manager, too.
Planner/Organizer: Someone who can see what needs to be done and help the team plan and
organize the getting it done. Management is getting things done through people. While a writer
or other visionary person may be very influential, even seminal for the cause of change, this is
not quite the definition of a leader. A leader means to me, someone who is taking action, trying
to get others to do something they want to see done.
Ability to understand human behavior: A leader should be able to understand employees’
needs and problems so as to make them work with willingness and enthusiasm.