Chapter Four Capital Budgeting/Investment Decision
Chapter Four Capital Budgeting/Investment Decision
Chapter Four Capital Budgeting/Investment Decision
The investment in any project will bring in desired profits or benefits in future. If the financial
resources were in abundance, it would be possible to accept several investment proposals which
satisfy the norms of approval or acceptability. Since, we are sure that resources are limited; a
choice has to be made among the various investment proposals by evaluating their comparative
merit. This would help us to select the relatively superior proposals keeping in view the limited
available resources. For this purpose, we have to develop some evaluating techniques for the
appraisal of investment proposals.
Expansion: A company adds capacity to its existing product lines to expand existing operations.
For example, a manufacturing unit producing one hundred thousand units per year. If it intends
to double the output by two hundred thousands, this will obviously increase the need for funds
for acquiring fixed and current assets.
Diversification: Sometimes the management of a company may decide to add new product line
to the existing product lines. Philips, a famous company for radio and electric bulbs etc.
diversified into production of other electrical appliances and television sets.
Replacements: Machines used in production may either wear out or may be rendered obsolete
on account of new technology. The productive capacity of the enterprise and its competitive
ability may be adversely affected. Extra funds are required for modernization or renovation of
the entire plant. The investment obviously is going to be long terms.
Research and Development: There has been an increased realization that the efficiency of
production and the total operations can be improved by application of new and more
sophisticated techniques of production and management. To acquire the technology huge funds
are needed.
Capital Rationing
We are aware that the financial resources are limited. But, a large number of investment
proposals compete for those limited funds. The firm, therefore ration them. The firm allocates
funds to projects in a manner that it maximizes long-run returns. Thus, capital rationing refers to
the situation in which the firm has more acceptable investments, requiring a greater amount of
finance than is available with the firm. It is concerned with the selection of a group of investment
proposals out of making investment proposals acceptable under the accept reject decision. The
projects are ranked as per their merits of acceptance basing on certain predetermined criteria.
This is one of the widely used methods for evaluating the investment proposals. Under this
method the focus is on the recovery of original investment at the earliest possible. It determines
the number of years to recoup the original cash out flow, disregarding the salvage value and
interest. These methods do not take into account the cash inflows that are received after the
payback period. There are two methods in use to calculate the payback period
1) Where annual cash flows are not consistent vary from year to year 2) Where the annual cash
flow is uniform
B
1. Unequal cash flows P=E+
C
Where, P stands for payback period.
E stands for number of years immediately preceding the year of final recovery.
B stands for the balance amount still to be recovered.
C stand for cash flow during the year of final recovery.
Original Investment
PB =
Annual cash flows
100,000
=
25,000
= 4 years
Accounting Rate of Return
This method is based on the financial accounting practices of the company working out the
annual profits. Here, instead of taking the annual cash flows, we take the annual profits into
account. The net annual profits are calculated after deducting depreciation and taxes. The
average of annual profits thus derived is worked out on the basis of the period
This concept is based on the time value of money. The flow of income is spread over a few
years. The real value of Birr in your hand today is better than value of birr you earn after a year.
The future income, therefore, has to be discounted in order to be associated with the current out
flow of funds in the investment. Two methods of appraisal of investment project are based on
this concept. These are net present value and internal rate of return method.
Year ACF
1 30,000
2 50,000
3 60,000
4 65,000
5 40,000
6 30,000
7 16,000
The cost of capital is 8%
1 1
Present value of birr 1 =
(1 r ) n
(1 .10)1
The present value of 1 Birr @ 10 costs after one year .909
Two year .826
Three .751
PI > 1 Accept
PI = 1 indifference
PI < 1 reject
Higher the profitability index more is the project preferred.
From the above example we can calculate the profitability index as below
Present value of cash out flows $ 180, 000
Present value of cash inflows $ 221, 513
NPVL
IRR = LRD + R
PV
where; IRR = Internal Rate of Return
LRD = Lower Rate of Discount
NPVL = Net present value at lower rate of discount
(i.e., difference between present values of cash)
PV = The difference in present values at lower and higher discount values at
lower.
R = The difference between two rates of discount.
Ex: Nissan Plc. has $100, 000 on hand. This amount is invested in a project, where the annual
benefits after taxes are as below. It would like to know the rate of return earned by the company
at the end of the life of the project.
Year ACFS
1 $ 40, 000
2 35, 000
3 30, 000
4 25, 000
5 20, 000