Lecture-I Introduction
Lecture-I Introduction
Lecture - I
Introduction on Integrated Process and Energy
utilization: The Hierarchy of process design
Definitions
Conceptual Design: refers to that part of a design project that deals with
the fundamental elements of a process: layout of the units or flowsheet,
material and energy balances, specifications, performance and sizing
of the equipment, energy requirements, safety, hazard and
environmental issues and economic efficiency
• Study the plantwide control strategy for managing the inventory of components
and the energy balance
Existing Process
New process
➢ For each plant specify the separation system and estimate its
annualized cost. Additional hierarchical refinement reveals seven
sub-levels.
– the raw materials costs normally fall in the range from 33 to 85%
– the environmental impact of any waste materials and pollutants produced must be taken into
account when evaluating alternative synthesis routes
The reactant
chemicals are drawn Product chemicals
as streams entering are drawn as
from the left streams leaving to
the right.
➢ NB:- Unwanted side reactions and products must be considered. The unwanted
products are treated as by-products and must leave along with the product
streams shown on the right of the diagram.
2. Energy efficiency
a) Generalisation of Pinch Analysis: Pinch Analysis emphasises saving opportunities and guides
design modifications both for new and retrofitting projects
b) Complex columns and thermally coupled distillation systems: Employing complex distillation
devices instead of simple columns and thermal coupling offers substantial savings in energy
c) Cogeneration and site utility systems: Cogeneration consists of simultaneous production of
heat and electricity. This method is attractive for processes involving highly exothermic
reactions or for valorising low-value by-products and waste such as Bagasse
a) Safety first: Safe operation has the highest priority. Safe design can be
achieved by incorporating non-linear analysis in process dynamics and
control.
b) Increased process flexibility and inventory reduction: In the context of
an uncertain market, modern process design should ensure good plant
performance for large flexibility in throughput (ex: +10%/ to 30%).
Reducing the inventory of units has positive effects on safety, dynamics
and costs.
c) Emphasis on quality: The goal is ensuring constant product quality
corresponding to specifications, which can be achieved by the
reduction of impurities and by implementing advanced process analysis
equipment
1. Heuristics-based methods
3. Optimization methods
– Mass integration (mass exchanger networks) where the flow route of mass
within the process is optimized, for example, through the use of
concentration differences
4) IPD deals with both new (grassroots) plants, as well with debottlenecking and
retrofitting existingplants.
▪ The methods and tools can be applied to any type of process industries,
from oil refining to petrochemical industries, Sugar to food processing
industries, pharmaceuticals manufacturing, biotechnologies, etc
– Exhaust of resources;
Sustainable
Development
Environmental Social
protection acceptance
Economic Problem
• “Meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs”(WCED 1987).
▪ Model of sustainable
development (adapted
from Azapagic and
Perdan, 2000).
• Any particular technology that is designed to provide economic value through clean
chemistries.
• Process design starts with the Reactor (R). Based on the mixture composition
at the reactor outlet,
• The development continues with the Separation system (S).
• Then, the design addresses the Heat Recovery (H) and Utility (U) systems.
5th The process and the utility system will both need water, for
example, for steam generation, and will also produce aqueous
effluents that will have to be brought to a suitable quality for
discharge. Thus, the design of the water and aqueous effluent
treatment system comes last.
➢ Process design starts with the reactor. The reactor design dictates the separation and recycle problem. (From Smith
R and Linnhoff B, 1998, Trans IChemE ChERD, 66:195 by permission of the Institution of Chemical Engineers).
➢ Changing the reactor dictates a different separation and recycle problem. (From Smith R and Linnhoff
B, 1988, Trans IChemE ChERD, 66: 195 by permission of the Institution of Chemical Engineers).
➢ A different reactor design not only leads to a different separation system but additional possibilities for
heat integration. (From Smith R and Linnhoff B, 1988, Trans IChemE ChERD, 66: 195 by permission of the
Institution of Chemical Engineers).
II. The design is carried out to modify an existing plant in retrofit or revamp.
– To increase capacity,
↓ The design must try to
– Allow for different feed or product specifications,
work within the
constraints of existing
– Energy integration/saving
equipment. Because of
this, the ultimate goal of
– Reduce operating costs,
the retrofit design is often
not clear.
– Improve safety or
1. Building an irreducible structure: The first approach follows the “onion logic”,
starting the design by choosing a reactor and then moving outward by adding a
separation and recycle system, and so on.
– At each layer, decisions must be made on the basis of the information available at
that stage. The ability to look ahead to the completed design might lead to different
decisions.
– This approach to creation of the design involves making a series of best local
decisions.
b) Completing and evaluating many options gives no guarantee of ultimately finding the best
possible design, as the search is not exhaustive. Also, complex interactions can occur between
different parts of a flowsheet. The effort to keep the system simple and not add features in the
early stages of design may result in missing the benefit of interactions between different parts
of the flowsheet in a more complex system.
➢ The main advantage of this approach is that the design team can keep control of the
basic decisions and interact as the design develops. By staying in control of the basic
decisions, the intangibles of the design can be included in the decision making.
a) The approach will fail to find the optimal structure if the initial structure does not have
the optimal structure embedded somewhere within it. The more options included, the
more likely it will be that the optimal structure has been included.
b) If the individual unit operations are represented
accurately, the resulting mathematical model will be
extremely large and the objective function that must be
optimized will be extremely irregular. The profile of the
objective function can be like the terrain in a range of
mountains with many peaks and valleys.
▪ The conceptual phase takes only 2% of the total project cost, although it could contribute
more than 30% in cost-reduction opportunities. At the detailed design phase, the cost of
engineering rises sharply to 12%, while saving opportunities fall to only 15% In contrast, the
cost of procurement and construction increases to more than 80%, while the saving
opportunities drop to 10%. At the commissioning stage, the total cost is frozen “