Income Effect, Substitution Effect and Price Effect!: Advertisements
Income Effect, Substitution Effect and Price Effect!: Advertisements
Price Effect!
In the above analysis of the consumer’s equilibrium it was assumed
that the income of the consumer remains constant, given the prices of
the goods X and Y. Given the tastes and preferences of the consumer
and the prices of the two goods, if the income of the consumer
changes, the effect it will have on his purchases is known as the
income Effect.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
If the income of the consumer increases his budget line will shift
upward to the right, parallel to the original budget line. On the
contrary, a fall in his income will shift the budget line inward to the
left. The budget lines are parallel to each other because relative prices
remain unchanged.
In Figure 12.14 when the budget line is PQ, the equilibrium point is R
where it touches the indifference curve I1. If now the income of the
consumer increases, PQ will move to the right as the budget line P 1, I1,
and the new equilibrium point is S where it touches the indifference
curve I2. As income increases further, PQ becomes the budget line with
T as its equilibrium point.
The locus of these equilibrium points R, S and T traces out a curve
which is called the income-consumption curve (ICC). The ICC curve
shows the income effect of changes in consumer’s income on the
purchases of the two goods, given their relative prices.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
Figure 12.15 (B) shows a vertical income consumption curve when the
consumption of good X reaches the saturation level R on the part of
the consumer. He has no inclination to increase its purchases despite
further increases in his income. He continues to purchase OA of it
even at higher income levels. Thus X is a necessity here.
Upto point R the ICC curve has- a positive slope and beyond that it is
negatively inclined. The consumer’s purchases of Y fall with the
increase in his income. Similarly in Figure 12.15 (D), good X is shown
as inferior and Y is a superior good beyond the equilibrium point R
when the ICC curve turns back upon itself. In both these cases the
income effect is negative beyond point R on the income-consumption
curve ICC.
The different types of income-consumption curves are also shown in
Figure 12.16 where: (1) ICC1 Alternative Method, has a positive slope
and relates to normal goods; (2) IСС2 is horizontal from point A, X is a
normal good while Y is a necessity of which the consumer does not
want to have more than the usual quantity as his income increases
further: (3) IСС3 is vertical from A, К is a normal good here and X is
satiated necessity; (4) ICC4 is negatively inclined downwards, Y
becomes an inferior good form A onwards and X is a superior good;
and (5) ICC5 shows X as an inferior good.
The Substitution Effect:
The substitution effect relates to the change in the quantity demanded
resulting from a change in the price of good due to the substitution of
relatively cheaper good for a dearer one, while keeping the price of the
other good and real income and tastes of the consumer as constant.
Prof. Hicks has explained the substitution effect independent of the
income effect through compensating variation in income. “The
substitution effect is the increase in the quantity bought as the price of
the commodity falls, after adjusting income so as to keep the real
purchasing power of the consumer the same as before. This
adjustment in income is called compensating variations and is shown
graphically by a parallel shift of the new budget line until it become
tangent to the initial indifference curve.”
If we regard PQ2, as the original budget line, a two time rise in the
price of X will lead to the shifting of the budget line to PQ1, and PQ2.
Each of the budget lines fanning out from P is a tangent to an
indifference curve I1, I2, and I3 at R, S and T respectively. The curve
PCC connecting the locus of these equilibrium points is called the
price- consumption curve. The price-consumption curve indicates the
price effect of a change in the price of X on the consumer’s purchases
of the two goods X and Y, given his income, tastes, preferences and the
price of good Y.