0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views3 pages

Null Hypothesis

1. A study tested whether a week's sales training course improved rapport with customers for 10 salesladies. No significant difference was found between rapport scores before and after training. 2. A study examined calcium levels in soil before and after a prescribed burn. Calcium levels were significantly higher after the burn compared to before. 3. A study compared diastolic blood pressure readings between sedentary patients and those who exercised regularly. Diastolic readings were significantly lower for the exercise group compared to the sedentary group.

Uploaded by

Machi Komacine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views3 pages

Null Hypothesis

1. A study tested whether a week's sales training course improved rapport with customers for 10 salesladies. No significant difference was found between rapport scores before and after training. 2. A study examined calcium levels in soil before and after a prescribed burn. Calcium levels were significantly higher after the burn compared to before. 3. A study compared diastolic blood pressure readings between sedentary patients and those who exercised regularly. Diastolic readings were significantly lower for the exercise group compared to the sedentary group.

Uploaded by

Machi Komacine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

1.

a. Hypothesis
Ho: A week’s training course will not help 10 salesladies’ rapport with the customers
Ha: A week’s training course will help 10 salesladies’ rapport with the customers

Ttab = 2.1009 Tcom = 0.9774


Ttab > Tcom
Accept Null Hypothesis
P-Value = 0.3413
P-Value > 0.05

b. Excel Output

c. Result in APA Format


The difference in the salesladies’ rapport with the customers before training (Mean = 6.61; SD
= 0.56) and after training (Mean = 6.91; SD = 0.78) was not significant (t (18) = 0.9774; p =
0.3413).
2.
a. Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference in the mean og calcium levels in the soil prior to
and after the prescribed burn
Ha: There is a significant difference in the mean og calcium levels in the soil prior to and
after the prescribed burn.

Ttab = 2.0739 Tcom = 6.4623


Ttab < Tcom
Reject Null Hypothesis
P-Value = 0.00000016793
P-Value < 0.05

b. Excel Output
2
Calcium level (kg/plot)
Preburn Postburn
50 9
50 18
82 45
64 18
82 18
73 9
77 32
54 9
23 18
45 9
36 9
54 9

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

Preburn Postburn
Mean 57.5 16.91666667
Variance 346.2727273 126.9924242
SD 18.60840475 11.26909154
Observations 12 12
Pooled Variance 236.6325758
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 22
t Stat 6.462284516
P(T<=t) one-tail 8.39643E-07
t Critical one-tail 1.717144374
P(T<=t) two-tail 1.67929E-06
t Critical two-tail 2.073873068

c. Result in APA Format


The difference in the mean og calcium levels in the soil prior to and after the prescribed burn.
(Mean = 57.5; SD = 18.60) and after the prescribed burn. (Mean = 88.90; SD = 4.63) was
significant (t (22) = 6.46228; p = 1.67929).
3.
a. Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference in test diastolic blood readings between patients
with sedentary lifestyles (Group A) and those who exercised 1 hour at least 2 times per week
(Group B).
Ha: There is a significant difference in test diastolic blood readings between patients
with sedentary lifestyles (Group A) and those who exercised 1 hour at least 2 times per week
(Group B).

Ttab = 2.1009 Tcom = 2.4335


Ttab < Tcom
Reject Null Hypothesis
P-Value = 0.0256
P-Value < 0.05

b. Excel Output

c. Result in APA Format


The difference in test diastolic blood readings between patients with sedentary lifestyles
(Group A) (Mean = 88.1; SD = 6.40) and those who exercised 1 hour at least 2 times per week
(Group B). (Mean = 78.8; SD = 10.25) was significant (t (18) = 2.433458; p = 0.025602).

You might also like