Obr 12582
Obr 12582
Obr 12582
12582
Obesity Etiology
1
Physical Education Post Graduate Program, Summary
University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, Previous studies have found that obesity could influence academic performance.
2
Anschutz Center for Health and Wellness, The aim of this study was to systematically review the scientific evidence on the
University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA, association between obesity and academic performance in school children. A
3
School of Health and Social Care, Teesside systematic review of English articles was undertaken by using databases
University, Middlesbrough, UK, 4 Department of PubMed/Medline, ERIC, LILACS, SciELO and Web of Science. Cross-sectional
Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, and longitudinal studies examining the association between obesity and academic
MO, USA, and 5 Department of Human performance in children and adolescents, published between January 1990 and
Movement Sciences, Federal University of São December 2016, were included. Risk of bias was assessed by using Strengthening
Paulo, Santos, Brazil the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. Thirty-four studies (23
cross-sectional and 11 longitudinal) matched all inclusion criteria and were
Received 13 March 2017; revised 22 May included. Seven studies were classified as low risk of bias, 23 as medium risk and
2017; accepted 24 May 2017 four as high risk. After controlling for covariates such as socio-economic status,
parental education and physical activity, the association between obesity and
Address for correspondence: WL Prado, academic performance becomes uncertain for most of the studies (55.9%).
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Therefore, at present, there is insufficient evidence to support a direct link between
Federal University of São Paulo, Silva Jardim obesity and poor academic performance in school age children. In order to clarify
street, 136, 11015-020 Santos, São Paulo, this issue, we need more longitudinal studies with adequate sample sizes and that
Brazil. control for potential confounders.
E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: Academic achievement, obesity, physical education, students.
the inclusion criteria (13 did not use objective measures for Participants
academic performance (13,24–35)), nine were conducted in
The sample size of the studies ranged from 37 to 18.746 and
adults (2,36–43) and six were review studies (44–49)).
included students from kindergarten through high school.
Therefore, 34 studies were included in this systematic
Eight (23.5%) studies did not report age
review (Fig. 1).
(18,50,51,54,66,71,74,76). Studies were conducted in both
genders, except Heshmat et al. (72), which was conducted
only in boys.
Characteristics of included studies
The main characteristics and results of the 34 studies are
presented in Appendix 1 (Supporting information). Half of Dependent variable outcome: academic
the studies (N = 17) were conducted in the USA performance
(10,18,19,50–63). Two studies were conducted in Canada Academic performance was measured by standardized tests
(64,65), and two studies in Colombia (66,67). The other (knowledge in reading, writing, mathematics and general
studies were conducted in Kuwait (68), Portugal (69), UK knowledge) in 29 studies. The others used grades achieved
(70), Taiwan (71), Iran (72), Denmark (73), Korea (74), in those disciplines (60,68,71,74,76). All studies used
Finland (75), Japan (76), Chile (77), Italy (78), Spain (79) reliable measures for academic performance.
and Netherlands (80). Twenty-three studies were cross-
sectional, and 11 studies had longitudinal design.
Independent variable outcomes
Twenty-nine studies directly measured weight and height. In
Risk of bias
two studies, these measurements were self-reported (74,78).
From the 23 cross-sectional studies, four were classified as Three studies did not describe how weight and height
high risk of bias (13,69,76,78), 16 as medium risk of bias measurements were made for calculating BMI (62,70,77).
(10,50,52,54,56,58,60–62,66,67,72–74,76,79) and three Two studies assessed waist circumference (62,77). Body
as low risk of bias (55,59,68). From the 11 longitudinal composition was measured in four studies (one used dual-
studies, seven studies were classified as medium risk of bias energy X-ray absorptiometry (58), one used skinfold
(51,57,63,64,71,75,80), and four as low risk of bias thickness (69) and two used bioelectrical impedance
(18,53,65,70). (59,60). BMI was stratified according to the International
Obesity Task Force (81) in five studies (65,69,71,75,80). factors. Five studies had relatively small sample sizes in
One study (72) used Must et al. (82), and one used a relation to others and did not provide information about
national standardized equation (60). Twenty-two studies statistical power (50,60,62,72,78). The sample size of
used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention charts (83) studies that used regression analyses ranged from 37 to
to classify BMI. Bisset et al. (64) used both (Centers for 18,746 students.
Disease Control and Prevention) charts (83) and
International Obesity Task Force (81). Four studies did
not report the criteria for BMI categorization (62,73,77,78). Main findings
Table 1 summarizes the level of scientific evidence for the
associations between obesity and academic performance in
Analysis
school-age children. In summary, according to pre-
Eight studies conducted a random sample of the established criteria, 11/23 cross-sectional studies (47.8%)
population (18,53,54,57,63,65,68,74). Ten studies and 4/11 longitudinal studies (36.3%) reported a negative
reported the statistical power of the analysis association between obesity and academic performance.
(53,55,57,59,64,65,68,70,73,76), while 24 studies did None of the cross-sectional studies (0/4) with low risk of
not report power analyses or sample size calculations bias found a significant association between obesity and
(10,18,19,50–52,56,58,60–64,66,67,69,71,72,74,75,77– academic performance after adjusting for socio-economic
80). Thirteen studies did not report any adjustment for status (SES), ethnicity, age, physical activity level and
potential confounding factors in their analysis (50,55– parental educational level (55,59,68). Two of these studies
57,59,60,62,67,72,75,78–80). conducted with large populations (>1,000 participants)
The association between obesity and academic (59,68) found no association between obesity and academic
performance was assessed by multivariate linear performance after adjusting for parental education and SES.
regression analyses in 16 studies. Half of the 16 cross-sectional studies with a medium risk of
(18,50,52,53,57,58,61,63,66,70,71,73,76–78,80), logistic bias reported a significant negative association between BMI
binomial regression in six studies (52,60,66,68,74,79), and academic performance (50,54,58,60,62,72,74,76).
ordinary least squares in one study (54), structural equation However, two of these studies (62,72) did not adjust the
for mediation in one study (75), analyses of covariance in analysis for confounders and did not report statistical power
four studies (10,56,62,69) and ANOVA in one study (19). calculations. In two of these studies (50,58), the negative
Three studies did simple correlation (50,55,59), and two association remained even after adjustments for age, sex,
did Student’s t-tests (55,72). Five studies provided details IQ, SES and cardiorespiratory fitness. Morita et al. (76)
regarding variable selection (backward or forward) and found that obesity was negatively associated with academic
analysis of the residual distribution in the final model performance only in girls. This association was significant
(18,54,70,71,80). Only Carter et al. (65) performed the final in an unadjusted analysis and after adjustments for physical
model analysis by multicollinearity using variance inflation fitness, SES and sedentary behaviour. Alternatively, Kang
Table 1 Distribution of the studies that investigated cross-sectional and longitudinal associations by risk of bias and the level of scientific evidence
Study design Studies that demonstrated Study by risk Association or no association Level of
association of bias according to study risk of bias evidence
Cross-sectional (n = 23) Yes: 11 (47.8%) Low: 3 (13.0%) Low risk of bias: Yes: 0 (0.0%) Uncertain association
Medium: 16 (68.2%) No: 3 (100.0%)
High: 4 (18.2%) Medium risk of bias: Yes: 8
(50.0%) (negative association)
No: 8 (50.0%)
High risk of bias: Yes: 3 (75.0%)
(negative association) No: 1
(25.0%)
Total: Yes: 11 (47.8%) No: 12
(52.2%)
Longitudinal (n = 11) Yes: 4 (36.3%) Low: 4 (36.3%) Low risk of bias: Yes: 2 (50.0%) Uncertain association
Medium: 7 (63.7%) (negative association)
High: 0 (100.0%) No: 2 (50.0%)
Medium risk of bias: Yes: 2 (28.6%)
(negative association) No: 5 (71.4%)
High risk of bias: 0
Total: Yes: 4 (36.3%) No: 8 (72.7%)
et al. (74) found a negative association between obesity and between outcomes. Bisset et al. (64) followed 5,754 children
academic performance only in boys, after adjustment for for 3 years and reported that maintaining overweight
father’s education, family income, physical activity, sleeping during mid-childhood was not associated with poorer
time and time spent on electronic devices. Another study academic performance. In a study (65) with an 11-year
(60) showed a negative association between BMI, fatness follow up of 4,647 children from birth to 11 years old, no
and academic performance after controlling the analyses significant association between obesity and academic
for gender, ethnicity and age. However, due to a small sample performance was found.
size (N = 45 students) and weak statistical power, caution
should be used in interpreting these results. Of the remaining
Discussion
eight studies with a medium risk bias, one found a positive
association between obesity and academic performance This systematic review expands a previous review (20) by
(52) and the other seven studies did not find any significant including studies conducted up until 2016 and by including
association (10,56,61,66,67,73,79). a qualitative assessment of the studies. While Taras and
The duration for the longitudinal studies varied Potts-Datema (20) suggested that obesity could be
considerably (from 18 months up to 18 years) (18,57). associated with poor academic performance, our results
Two out of four longitudinal studies with low risk of bias revealed no strong evidence for this association.
reported a significant negative association between BMI Overall, only 15 of the 34 studies that met our criteria
and academic performance (53,70). These studies followed found a significant negative relationship between obesity
more than 5,000 children for 5 (53) and 6 years (70). The and academic performance. Eleven of the 23 cross-
results revealed that children with obesity, or who became sectional studies and four of the 11 longitudinal studies
obese during childhood, had lower academic performance reported a significant negative relationship between
compared with normal weight children. In the study of obesity and academic performance. When considering
Booth et al. (70) a strong association between obesity and study quality, 2/8 studies with low risk of bias and
academic performance was found in girls after adjusting 9/23 studies with medium risk of bias reported a
for birth weight, maternal smoking during pregnancy, SES, significant negative relationship between obesity and
physical activity and pubertal status. In boys, obesity was academic performance. When controlled for covariates
not significantly associated with academic performance. such as SES, parental education, physical activity,
From the seven longitudinal studies with medium risk of sedentary behaviour and health-related risk factors, the
bias, one study reported a negative association between association between obesity and academic performance
overweight and academic performance in girls only. This was weakened or disappeared (10,18,54,55,58,59,62,67–
study followed 7,000 children for up to 4 years (51). 69). While insufficient data exist to support a significant
Another study with medium risk of bias followed 8,061 relationship between obesity and academic performance,
children for 8 years and reported that academic more high-quality studies are needed to bring greater
performance might have been mediated by obesity (75). clarity to the issue.
Seven longitudinal studies, including two with low risk
and five with medium risk of bias did not find association
Outcome assessments
between obesity and academic performance when
controlling for parental education screen time, family, Academic performance is highly dependent on the
school and teacher characteristics, SES and maternal instrument used to quantify academic achievement. In the
education (18,57,63–65,71,80). Chen et al. (71) followed current literature, several different tools have been used
409 children for 6 years. Only gender was controlled in for measuring this outcome, ranging from teacher-reported
the model, since the authors considered the sample size classroom behaviour, teacher-reported children’s effort,
insufficient for conducting additional analyses. Veldwijk overall grades and standardized tests. The variability in
et al. (80) followed 2,159 children for 4 years and did not measurement tools makes it difficult to compare between
find a significant association between obesity and academic studies.
performance after the analysis was adjusted for parental Obesity is supposed to affect children’s cognitive
education, skipping breakfast and screen time. Zavodny function, which comprises attention and set shifting
(63) followed 15,795 children for 7 years, and Kaestner (84,85), inhibitory control (86), abstract reasoning and
and Grossman (57) followed 2,500 for 7 years. Neither visual–spatial organization (5). Different methods are
study found any significant association between obesity appropriate for specific cognitive functions, which may
and academic performance after adjustments for family, explain the lack of agreement among studies. Many of the
and child characteristics. test items that comprise standardized tests of academic
Datar et al. (18) followed 11,192 children for up to performance are impacted by processing speed and rapid
18 months and did not report a significant association decision-making, processes known to be negatively related
to obesity (87). The results of studies using standardized conclusions about causality could be made. Additional
tests that focus on specific aspects of performance, such as limitations of the literature include reliance on BMI as a
math or reading skills, tend to be more precise than tests proxy measure of adiposity since only one study used
that are more global in nature. The development of a ‘gold DXA, which is considered the gold standard of adiposity
standard’ measurement method would help our ability to measurement.
study the association between obesity and academic
performance.
Another point to consider is that the effects of obesity on Conclusions
children’s academic performance may be only observed
Through a rigorous and comprehensive systematic review
later in life (24,88). The causal processes linking academic
including qualitative evaluation of the studies, we
performance and obesity differ between the development
concluded that there is not strong evidence to support the
stages. The studies included in this review studied children
association between obesity and poor academic
from different ages, grades and weight history. Future
performance in school age children. The evidence in this
studies should assess the impact of early onset obesity on
area is limited by a preponderance of cross-sectional studies,
later academic performance.
failure to adjust for confounding factors and absence of
adequate power analyses. Overall, the balance of evidence
Influence of confounders suggests that while obesity may be related academic
performance, it is not possible from existing published
Many variables could influence the association between
research to determine if there is a causality link between
obesity and academic performance
the two.
(18,54,56,59,63,64,67,68,80). Gurley-Calvez and
As the nature and impact of childhood obesity on
Higginbotham (54) suggested that SES could moderate this
children’s development continue to be studied, the
association. Race/ethnicity and mother’s education may be
development and assessment of more comprehensive
stronger predictors of academic performance than obesity
conceptual and assessment models are needed. Identifying
(67). Body characteristics (such as obesity) are more likely
effective models for evaluating children’s obesity and
to be noticed by children than socio-economic
academic performance would be beneficial for researchers,
characteristics, suggesting that obesity stigma per se could
clinicians, school representatives, families and policies
affect overweight children’s academic performance (18).
makers.
Few studies have controlled the analysis for physical
activity/physical fitness (10,18,51,59,61,68,70,73,75–77).
There is some evidence that physical activity/physical fitness
may positively modulate cognition and academic
Acknowledgements
performance (16,67), as children with obesity are more This work was supported by the Coordination for the
likely to have low physical activity level and physical fitness Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).
(89,90).
Only one study (62) presented the effect size of the No conflict of interest was declared.
association between obesity and academic performance.
This study showed a small effect size in the association Supporting information
between obesity and spelling skills ( 0.28) and medium
effect between obesity and arithmetic ( 0.60). The lack of Additional Supporting Information may be found online in
reported effect sizes in the included studies limits the the supporting information tab for this article. https://doi.
estimation of the magnitude of association. org/10.1111/obr.12582
2. Huizinga MM, Beech BM, Cavanaugh KL, Elasy TA, Rothman (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 2007; 18:
RL. Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI. Obesity 805–835.
2008; 16: 1966–1968. 23. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Bamett LM, Okely AD.
3. Schwimmer JB, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Health-related quality Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review
of life of severely obese children and adolescents. JAMA 2003; 289: of associated health benefits. Sports Med 2010; 40: 1019–1035.
1813–1819. 24. Alatupa S, Pulkki-Ráback L, Hintsanen M et al. School
4. Yu ZB, Han SP, Cao XG, Guo XE. Intelligence in relation to performance as a predictor of adulthood obesity: a 21-year
obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity 2009; 11: follow-up study. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 267–274.
656–670. 25. Arora T, Hosseini-Araghi M, Bishop J, Yao GL, Thomas GN,
5. Li Y, Dai Q, Jackson JC, Zhang J. Overweight is associated with Taheri S. The complexity of obesity in UK adolescents: relationships
decreased cognitive functioning among school-age children and with quantity and type of technology, sleep duration and quality,
adolescents. Obesity 2008; 16: 1809–1815. academic performance and aspiration. Pediatr Obes 2013; 8:
6. Azurmendi A, Braza F, Sorozabal A et al. Cognitive abilities, 358–366.
androgen levels, and body mass index in 5-year-old children. Horm 26. Carey FR, Singh GK, Brown HS, Wilkinson AV. Educational
Behav 2005; 48: 187–195. outcomes associated with childhood obesity in the United States:
7. Cawley J, Spiess CK. Obesity and skill attainment in early cross-sectional results from the 2011–2012 National Survey of
childhood. Econ Hum Biol 2008; 6: 388–397. Children’s Health. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015; 12: 1–11.
8. Gunstad J, Spitznagel MB, Paul RH et al. Body mass index and 27. Florin TA, Shults J, Stettler N. Perception of overweight is
neuropsychological function in healthy children and adolescents. associated with poor academic performance in US adolescent. J
Appetite 2008; 50: 246–251. Sch Health 2011; 81: 663–670.
9. Serbin LA, Stack DM, Kingdon D. Academic sucess across the 28. MacCann C, Roberts RD. Just as smart but not as successful:
transition from primary to seconday schooling among lower- obese students obtain lower school grades but equivalent test scores
income adolescents: under-standing the effects resources and to nonobese students. Int J Obes 2013; 37: 40–46.
gender. J Youth Adolesc 2013; 42: 1331–1347. 29. Mo-Suwan L, Lebel L, Junjana C. School performance and
10. Cottrell LA, Northrup K, Wittberg R. The extended weight status of children and young adolescents in a transitional
relationship between child cardiovascular risks and academic society in Thailand. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23:
performance measures. Obesity 2007; 15: 3170–3177. 272–277.
11. Fowler-Brown A, Ngo L, Phillips R, Wee C. Adolescent 30. Sabia JJ. The effect of body weight on adolescent academic
obesity and future college degree attainment. Obesity 2010; 18: performance. South Econ J 2007; 73: 871–900.
1235–1241. 31. Stroebele N, McNally J, Plog A, Siegfried S, Hill JO. The
12. Griffiths LJ, Parsons TJ, Hill AJ. Self-esteem and quality of life association of self-reported sleep, weigh status, and academic
in obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr performance in fifth-grade students. J Sch Health 2013; 83: 77–84.
Obes 2010; 5: 282–304. 32. Xie B, Chou CP, Spruijt-Metz D et al. Weight perception,
13. Krukowski RA, West DS, Philyaw PA, Bursac Z, Phillips MM, academic performance, and psychological factors in Chinese
Raczynski JM. Overweight children, weight-based teasing and adolescents. Am J Health Behav 2006; 30: 115–124.
academic performance. Int J Pediatr Obes 2009; 4: 274–280. 33. Kim JH, So WY. Association between overweight/obesity and
14. Fan Y, Li Y, Liu A, Hu X, Ma G, Xu G. Associations between academic performance in South Korean adolescents. Cent Eur J
body mass index, weight control concerns and behaviors, and Public Health 2013; 21: 179–183.
eating disorder symptoms among non-clinical Chinese adolescents. 34. Freidl EK, Sysko R, Devlin MJ, Zitsman JL, Kaplan SC, Walsh
BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 1–12. BT. School and cognitive functioning problems in adolescent
15. Goldfield GS, Moore C, Henderson K, Buchholz A, Obeid N, bariatric surgery candidates. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013; 9:
Flament MF. Body dissatisfaction, dietary restraint, depression, 991–996.
and weight status in adolescents. J Sch Health 2010; 80: 186–192. 35. Suchert V, Hanewinkel R, Isensee B. Longitudinal relationships
16. Gunnarsdottir T, Njardvik U, Olafsdottir AS, Craighead LW, of fitness, physical activity, and weight status with academic
Bjarnason R. Teasing and social rejection among obese children achievement in adolescents. J Sch Health 2016; 86: 734–741.
enrolling in family-based behavioural treatment: effects on 36. Deliens T, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij L, Deforche B. Weight,
psychological adjustment and academic competencies. Int J Obes socio-demographics, and health behaviour related correlates of
2011; 36: 35–44. academic performance in first year university students. Nutr J
17. Pan L, Sherry B, Park S, Blanck HM. The association of 2013; 13: 1–9.
obesity and school absenteeism attributed to illness or injury among 37. Agarwal S, Bhalla P, Kaur S, Babbar R. Effect of body mass
adolescents in the United States. J Adolesc Health 2013; 52: 64–69. index on physical self concept, cognition & academic performance
18. Datar A, Sturm R, Magnabosco JL. Childhood overweight and of first year medical students. Indian J Med Res 2013; 138:
academic performance: national study of kindergartners and first- 515–522.
grades. Obes Res 2004; 12: 58–68. 38. Andreenko E, Mladenova S, Akabaliev V. Anthropometric
19. Shore SM, Sachs ML, Lidicker JR, Brett SN, Wright AR, obesity indices in relation to age, educational level, occupation
Libonati JR. Decreased scholastic achievement in overweight and physical activity in Bulgarian men. Nutr Hosp 2014; 31:
middle school students. Obesity 2008; 16: 1535–1538. 658–665.
20. Taras H, Potts-Datema W. Obesity and student performance at 39. Gavin AR, Simon GE, Ludman EJ. The association between
school. J Sch Health 2005; 75: 291–295. obesity, depression, and educational attainment in women: the
21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred mediating role of body image dissatisfaction. J Psychosom Res
reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the 2010; 69: 573–581.
PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–269. 40. Seppänen-Nuijten E, Lahti-Koski M, Männistö S et al. Fat free
22. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG et al. mass and obesity in relation to educational level. BMC Public
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology Health 2009; 9: 1–10.
41. Hajian-Tilaki KO, Heidari B. Association of educational level 61. Roberts CK, Freed B, McCarthy WJ. Low aerobic fitness and
with risk of obesity and abdominal obesity in Iranian adults. J obesity associated with lower standardized test scores in children.
Public Health 2010; 32: 202–209. J Pediatr 2010; 156: 711–718.
42. Nobre EL, Jorge Z, Domingues A, Macedo A, Jácome de 62. Yau PL, Kang EH, Javier DC, Convit A. Preliminary evidence
Castro J. The relationship between body mass index and of cognitive and brain abnormalities in uncomplicated adolescent
educational level in young Portuguese males: 1995 and 1999 obesity. Obesity 2014; 22: 1865–1871.
cohorts. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 1580–1584. 63. Zavodny M. Does affect children’s test scores and teacher
43. Schnohr C, Højbjerre L, Riegels M et al. Does educational level assessments differently? Econ Educ Rev 2013; 34: 135–145.
influence the effects of smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and 64. Bisset S, Foumier M, Pagani L, Janosz M. Predicting academic
obesity on mortality? A prospective population study. Scand J and cognitive outcomes from weight status trajectories during
Public Health 2004; 32: 250–256. childhood. Int J Obes 2013; 37: 154–159.
44. Martin A, Saunders DH, Shenkin SD, Sproule J. Lifestyle 65. Carter MA, Dubois L, Ramsay T. Examining the relationship
intervention for improving school achievement in overweight or between obesity and math performance among Canadian school
obese children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev children: a prospective analysis. Int J Pediatr Obes 2010; 5:
2014; 14: 1–95. 412–419.
45. Cosgrove RG, Arroyo C, Warren JC, Zhang J. Impaired 66. Baxter SD, Royer JA, Hardin JW, Guinn CH, Devlin CM. The
cognitive functioning in overweight children and adolescents. relationship of school absenteeism with body mass index, academic
Obesity 2009; 20: 48–51. achievement, and socioeconomic status among fourth-grade
46. Daniels DY. Examining attendance, academic performance, children. J Sch Health 2011; 81: 417–423.
and behavior in obese adolescents. J Sch Nurs 2008; 24: 67. Baxter SD, Guinn CH, Tebbs JM, Royer JA. There is no
379–387. relationship between academic achievement and body mass index
47. Burkhalter TM, Hillman CH. A narrative review of physical among fourth-grade, predominantly African–American children. J
activity, nutrition, and obesity to cognition and scholastic Acad Nutr Diet 2013; 113: 551–557.
performance across the human lifespan. Adv Nutr 2011; 2: 68. Abdelalim A, Ajaj N, Al-Tmimy A et al. Childhood obesity and
201–206. academic achievement among male students in public primary
48. Rampersaud GC, Pereira MA, Girard BL, Adams J, Metzl JD. schools in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 2011; 21: 14–19.
Breakfast habits, nutritional status, body weight, and academic 69. Barrigas C, Fragoso I. Obesity, academic performance and
performance in children and adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc 2005; reasoning ability in Portuguese students between 6 and 12 years
105: 743–760. old. J Biosoc Sci 2012; 44: 165–179.
49. Cohen AK, Rai M, Rehkopf DH, Abrams B. Educational 70. Booth JN, Tomporowski PD, Boyle JME et al. Obesity impairs
attainment and obesity: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2013; 14: academic attainment in adolescence: findings from ALSPAC, a UK
989–005. cohort. Int J Obes 2014; 38: 1335–1342.
50. Clark D, Slate JR, Viglietti GC. Children’s weight and 71. Chen LJ, Fox KR, Ku PW, Wang CH. A longitudinal study of
academic performance in elementary school: cause for concern? childhood obesity, weight status change, and subsequent academic
ASAP 2009; 9: 185–104. performance in Taiwanese children. J Sch Health 2012; 82:
51. Datar A, Sturm R. Childhood overweight and elementary 424–431.
school outcomes. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 1449–1460. 72. Heshmat R, Larijani FA, Pourabbasi A, Pourabbasi A. Do
52. Eide ER, Showalter MH, Goldhaber DD. The relation between overweight students have lower academic performance than their
children’s health and academic achievement. Child Youth Serv Rev classmates? A pilot cross sectional study in a middle school in
2010; 32: 231–238. Tehran. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2014; 13: 1–5.
53. Gable S, Krull JL, Chang Y. Boys’ and girls’ weight status and 73. Huang T, Tarp J, Domazet SL et al. Associations of adiposity
Math performance from kindergarten entry through fifth grade: a and aerobic fitness with executive function and Math performance
mediated analysis. Child Dev 2012; 83: 1822–1839. in Danish adolescents. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 810–815.
54. Gurley-Calvez T, Higginbotham A. Childhood obesity, 74. Kang YW, Park JH. Does skipping breakfast and being
academic achievement, and school expenditures. Public Financ overweight influence academic achievement among Korean
Rev 2010; 38: 619–646. adolescents? Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2016; 7:
55. Harrington SA. Relationship of objectively measured physical 220–227.
activity and sleep with BMI and academic outcomes in 8-year-old 75. Kantomaa MT, Stamatakis E, Kankaanpää A et al. Physical
children. Appl Nurs Res 2013; 26: 63–70. activity and obesity mediate the association between childhood
56. Judge S, Jahns L. Association of overweight with academic motor function and adolescents’ academic achievement. PNAS
performance and social and behavioral problems: an update from 2013; 110: 1917–1922.
the early childhood longitudinal study. J Sch Health 2007; 77: 76. Morita N, Nakajima T, Okita K, Ishihara T, Sagawa M,
672–678. Yamatsu K. Relationship among fitness, obesity, screen time and
57. Kaestner R, Grossman M. Effects of weight children’s academic achievement in Japanese adolescents. Physiol Behav
educational achievement. Econ Educ Rev 2009; 28: 651–661. 2016; 163: 161–166.
58. Kamijo K, Khan NA, Pontifex MB et al. The relation of 77. Olivares PR, García-Rubio J. Associations between different
adiposity to cognitive control and scholastic achievement in components of fitness and fatness with academic performance in
preadolescent children. Obesity 2012; 20: 2406–2411. Chilean youths. Peer J 2016; 6: 1–17.
59. LeBlanc MM, Martin CK, Han H et al. Adiposity and physical 78. Tonetti L, Fabbri M, Filardi M, Martoni M, Natale V. The
activity are not related to academic achievement in school-aged association between higher body mass index and poor school
children. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2012; 33: 486–494. performance in high school students. Pediatr Obes 2016; 11:
60. Ramaswamy R, Mirochna M, Perlmuter LC. The negative 27–29.
association of BMI with classroom effort in elementary school 79. Torrijos-Niño C, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Pardo-Guijarro MJ,
children. J Child Health Care 2010; 14: 161–169. García-Prieto JC, Arias-Palencia NM, Sánchez-López M. Physical
fitness, obesity, and academic achievement in schoolchildren. J reductions and executive dysfunction. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;
Pediatr 2014; 165: 104–109. 19: 1382–1387.
80. Veldwijk J, Fries MCE, Bemelmans WJE et al. Overweight and 86. Pauli-Pott U, Becker K, Albayrak O et al. Links between
school performance among primary school children: the PIAMA psychopathological symptoms and disordered eating behaviors in
birth cohort study. Obesity 2012; 20: 590–596. overweight/obese youths. Int J Eat Disord 2013; 46: 156–163.
81. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a 87. Sweat V, Yates KF, Migliaccio R, Convit A. Obese adolescents
standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: show reduced cognitive processing speed compared with healthy
international survey. BMJ 2000; 320: 1240–1243. weight peers. Child Obes 2017; 13: 190–196.
82. Must A, Dallal GE, Dietz WH. Reference data for obesity: 88. Anderson AS, Good DJ. Increased body weight affects academic
85th and 95th percentiles of body mass index (wt/ht2) and triceps performance in university students. Prev Med Rep 2017; 5: 220–223.
skinfold thickness. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53: 839–846. 89. Díez-Fernández A, Sánchez-Lopez M, Mora-Rodríquez R,
83. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM et al. CDC Notario-Pacheco B, Torrijos-Niño C, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Obesity
growth charts: United States. Adv Data 2000; 8: 1–27. as a mediator of the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on
84. Cserjesi R, Molnar D, Luminet O, Lenard L. Is there any cardiometabolic risk: a mediation analysis. Diabetes Care 2014;
relationship between obesity and mental flexibility in children? 37: 855–862.
Appetite 2007; 49: 675–678. 90. Pahkala K, Hernelahti M, Heinonen OJ et al. Body mass
85. Maayan L, Hoogendoorn C, Sweat V, Convit A. Disinhibited index, fitness and physical activity from childhood through
eating in obese adolescents is associated with orbitofrontal volume adolescence. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 71–77.