173-Article Text-490-1-10-20181113 - 2
173-Article Text-490-1-10-20181113 - 2
173-Article Text-490-1-10-20181113 - 2
and Santhosh [6]. Therefore, our designed 5thorder stepped First step is to compute the order of filter satisfying the
impedance based low-pass filter provides better insertion insertion loss specifications at 3.5 GHz. Figure 1 depicts that
loss in pass-band along with optimum level of attenuation N=5 is sufficient for at least 20 dB attenuation at 3.5 GHz
that can be obtained using higher order LPF at 3.5GHz [4]. with ripple level of 0.5 dB in pass band. Filter prototype
Generally, higher order filters are chosen to achieve steeper element values for N=1 to N=6 are tabulated below [9].So,
roll-off in transition band and achieve good suppression Table I. gives element values such as
characteristics in stop-band. Application of Richard g0 = 1.00 (generator conductance)
transformation and Kuroda’s identity is one of the best g1 =1.7053 = L1
means to cope with the requirements of reduced transition g2=1.2296 = C2
band and higher attenuation in stop-band without resorting g3= 2.5408 = L2
to higher-order filters, thereby resulting in compact filters g4= 1.2296 = C3
[7]. Thus, with the same filter specifications to attain better g5= 1.7053 = L4
roll-off in transition band and to have substantial amount of g6=1.00 (load conductance as g5 is a series inductor)
attenuation than the former topology, we come up with the
optimized version of loaded stub low-pass filter where we TABLE I. ELEMENT VALUES FOR EQUAL-RIPPLE LOW-PASS
FILTER PROTOTYPES
remain successful to achieve a large amount of attenuation at
3.5GHz that is much larger than the LPF topology mentioned
earlier. Thus, our 5-pole filters can acquire aforementioned 0.5dB ripple
objectives in terms of insertion loss, roll-off and attenuation. N g1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g7
The remaining paper is organized as follows. Section II 1 0.6986 1.0000
demonstrates the design methodology of stepped impedance 2 1.4029 0.7071 1.9841
LPF. The dimensions of this LPF are computed in Section 3 1.5963 1.0967 1.5963 1.0000
III. Section IV comprises of simulated and measured results 4 1.6703 1.1926 2.3661 0.8419 1.9841
5 1.7058 1.2296 2.5408 1.2296 1.7058 1.0000
of the above said LPF. Section V describes the design 6 1.7254 1.2479 2.6064 1.3137 2.4758 0.8696 1.9841
procedure of stub loaded LPF. Shunt stub based filter
fabrication and test results are shown in section VI. Finally,
section VII concludes this paper
. Low-pass Chebyshev filter prototype is presented in Fig. 2.
II. DESIGN PROCEDURE OF LOW-PASS
MICROSTRIP STEPPED IMPEDANCE FILTER The electrical length (ϴ = βl) for inductors and capacitors
for microstrip structure realization are calculated using (1)
The modern insertion loss method is brought into play and (2) [8].
to synthesize a desired filter response, allowing control over
𝐿𝑍0
the pass-band and stop-band amplitude and phase 𝛽𝑙 = (inductor) (1)
𝑍ℎ
characteristic. Two major steps of filter designing are: 𝐶𝑍0
selection of a suitable low-pass filter archetype, a kind of 𝛽𝑙 = (capacitor) (2)
𝑍𝑙
response with a certain level of pass-band ripples and order
of the filter in agreement with filter specifications. The The width (W) of the strip conductor is function of its
element values of the low-pass filter prototype are subjected characteristic impedance [14]. To compute the physical
to normalization to have generator impedance g0=1 and cut- dimensions like Width (W) and length (l) corresponding to
off frequency (ωc) =1. Afterwards, they are altered to ladder- the electrical length of each inductor and capacitor section,
type circuit with source and load impedance of 50Ω for we use following formulas [4].
microstrip filters [8]. Element values for Nth order
Chebyshev low-pass filter with a certain ripple level in pass 𝑊 8𝑒 𝐴 𝑊
band are enumerated from g0 at the source impedance to = 2𝐴−2 𝑖𝑓 <2
ℎ 𝑒 ℎ
gN+1 at the load impedance. 2 𝜀 −1
= [𝐵 − 1 − ln(2𝐵 − 1) + 𝑟 {ln(𝐵 − 1) + 0.39 −
𝜋 2𝜀𝑟
0.61 𝑊
The Filter Specifications are }] 𝑖𝑓 >2
𝜀𝑟 ℎ
1. Topology: Stepped impedance
2. Relative dielectric constant (εr ) = 4.4 where
3. Thickness of substrate (h) = 62mil 𝑍0 𝜀𝑟 +1 𝜀𝑟 −1 0.11 377𝜋
4. Cut off frequency (fc) = 2.5GHz 𝐴= √ + (0.23 + )and𝐵 =
60 2 𝜀𝑟 +1 𝜀𝑟 2𝑍0 √𝜀𝑟
5. The loss tangent (tanδ) = 0.019
6. The system impedance Zo = 50Ω
Hereafter, using (3) the guided wavelength (𝜆𝑔 ) helps to
7. The Highest practical line impedance Zh = 120Ω
8. The lowest practical line impedance Zl= 20Ω calculate the physical length (l) of each capacitive and
9. Pass band ripple factor = 0.5 dB inductive section of stepped impedance filter.
𝜆
10. Insertion loss (S21) ≥ 20dB at 3.5GHz 𝜆𝑔 = (3)
√𝜀𝑒
Fig.1 Attenuation versus normalized frequency for equi-ripple filter prototypes for 0.5dB ripple level [4]
𝜀𝑟 +1 𝜀𝑟 −1 1
𝜀𝑒 = + [ ] (4)
2 2 ℎ
√1+12
𝑊
Full wave EM analysis on ADS is carried out to generate Fig. 6 Insertion loss (S21) vs frequency
more accurate results. As microstrip structure doesn’t
support pure transverse electric-magnetic (TEM) mode [10], In the wake of above simulated results, it is evident that
therefore in order to satisfy boundary conditions, designed filter is adequate for S-band applications as it can
longitudinal components of electric and magnetic field must pass frequency components below 2.2GHz with minimum
be taken into account. Furthermore, the indigenous insertion loss and rejects the signal beyond 2.5GHz, with
momentum tool of ADS aids to account for hybrid modes desired attenuation.
which are generated due to superposition of Transverse Photograph of manufactured filter is given in Fig. 7.
Electric (TE) and Transverse Magnetic (TM) modes [11]. Network Analyzer is used for performance measurements.
The Momentum layout and 3-D preview of the designed Hence, measured S21 results shown in Fig. 8 are in close
circuit are illustrated in Fig. 5(a) and Fig. 5 (b) respectively. agreement with simulated ones. LPF following stepped
impedance topology, find their way to front-end applications
where one can compromise on sharp cut-off [12].
and
To get better transition and stop-band response of LPF Fig. 10 Transfigured circuit
few converts are made in form of open circuited stubs. The
first step entails the selection of filter prototype as provided Afterwards, the addition of unit elements on input and
in Fig. 9. Meanwhile, normalized values of filter prototype output side of circuit of Fig. 10, following Kuroda’s
(order = 5) are selected from Table I. such as g1 = 1.7058, identities explained in Fig. 11, finally yields the circuit
g2 = 1.2296, g3 = 2.5408, g4 = 1.2296 and g5 = 1.7058. provided in Fig. 12.
Then 5th degree filter is gone through “Richard’s The Corresponding Width and physical length of each
𝜆
Transformation” to employ long open or short circuited unit element and transmission line open circuited shunt stubs
8
stubs, emulating capacitive and inductive attributes of are enumerated in table III. These can be computed using
lumped components respectively [13]. Equation (5) and (6) line-Cal tool in ADS providing electrical length (i. e θ =
λ
help to the above said stub’s synthesis [4]. ), characteristic impedance (Z0) and designed frequency
8
for the same substrate defined in the preceding section.
𝑗𝑋𝐿 = 𝑗𝐿 tan 𝛽𝑙 (5)
Z0 ϴ W(mm) l(mm)
50.00Ω λ/4 3.023 16.405
129.3Ω λ/8 0.297 8.802
81.50Ω λ/8 1.160 8.526
23.98Ω λ/8 8.765 7.779
79.91Ω λ/8 1.215 8.513
19.70Ω λ/8 11.243 7.686
Fig. 11 Equivalent circuits defining Kuroda’s Identities
V. FABRICATION AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
OF STUB LOADED LOW-PASS FILTER
VI. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
[1] Mike Golio, Janet Golio, “RF and Microwave Passive and
Active Technologies”, 2nd ed.
[2] Ralph Levy, Richard V.Synder, George Matthae, “Design
of Microwave Filters,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and
Techniques, vol.50, no. 3, March. 2002
Fig. 18 Momentum generated layout of optimized circuit [3] A. Das, A. Roy, K. Roy, A. Bhattacharyya, D. Chowdhury,
and S. Paul, “Design and analysis of microwave stepped
impedance low pass filter for Bluetooth application,” in
2015 IEEE International Conference on Electrical,
Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT),
2015, pp. 1–3.