About us  All journals All articles Submit your research  Search  Login

Frontiers in Environ… Sections  Articles Research Topics Editorial Board About journal 
SHARE
Download Article
5,081 (https://www.altmetric.com ON
total views
View Article Impact 
/details.php?domain=www.frontiersin.org&
citation_id=69647266)

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci., 01 November 2019 This article is part of the Research Topic
Sec. Conservation and Restoration Ecology North American Monarch Butter�y Ecology and Conservation
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00167 (https://doi.org/10.3389 View all 35 Articles
/fenvs.2019.00167) (/research-topics/7657#articles)

Recent Forest Cover Loss in the Core Zones of the Monarch

Butter�y Biosphere Reserve in Mexico

José Juan Flores-Martínez (https://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/609732)1*,

Anuar Martínez-Pacheco (https://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/801110)2, Eduardo Rendón-Salinas3,

Jorge Rickards (https://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/756184)2,

Sahotra Sarkar (https://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/101817)1,4 and Víctor Sánchez-Cordero1*

1 Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
2 World Wildlife Fund Inc., Mexico City, Mexico
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc., Zitácuaro, Mexico
4
Department of Integrative Biology and Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States

The Monarch Butter�y Biosphere Reserve (MBBR) in central Mexico was established in 2000 to protect
monarch butter�y (Danaus plexippus) overwintering colonies and contribute to the conservation of the
monarch migratory phenomenon. The MBBR has faced forest cover losses due to illegal logging and
climate-related factors. Here we report forest cover losses from 2012 to 2018 in the core zones of the
MBBR where most monarch overwintering colonies perch. We used aerial ortho-photographs and
satellite images complemented with �eld validation for temporal comparisons. During this period,
163.44 ha of forest cover were a�ected, 125.44 ha due to climate-related factors (rain and wind), 25.86
ha due to large-scale illegal logging, and 12.14 ha due to small-scale illegal logging. The core zone of
the MBBR located in the State of Michoacan showed the highest forest cover loss values with 94.07 ha
lost due to climate-related factors, and 38.0 ha lost due to illegal logging. Our study also showed a
substantial decrease of ~98% in large-scale illegal logging in the core zones of the MBBR compared to
previous reported forest losses from 2001 to 2012. Forest cover loss was similar, yet the periods of the
We use twocookies
studies di�ered, one 12 years in length, this one 6 years. The decrease of forest cover during the
perioduses
Our website studied suggests
cookies thatnecessary
that are factors elsewhere rather than forest cover loss in the monarch butter�y's
winter habitat have strongly
for its operation and to improve your contributed to the dramaticCookies
population declines observed
Settings in monarch
Accept Cookies
overwintering
experience. colonies
You can review since
and 2010.
control your
Download(/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00167/pdf)
cookies by clicking on "Accept Cookies" or on
"Cookies Settings".
Introduction
 Protected areas are a cornerstone for conserving biodiversity worldwide (Margules and Sarkar, 2007).
Most protected areas were
About us decreed
 adjournals
All hoc for protecting scenic values,
All articles Submitasyour
refuges of cultural heritage,
research  Search  Login
or to conserve speci�c places based on political criteria. Other protected areas have been decreed in
areas that are biodiversity hotspots thereby contributing to their conservation (Room et al., 2000; Saura
Frontiers in Environ…
et al., 2018). Protected areasSections
are also  Articles
important for human Research Topics
well-being when Editorial Board
they provide many About journal 

environmental services, serve as areas of resilience to ameliorate negative impacts of climate change
and other global change factors, and serve as refugia for the cultural heritage of local communities
(Carey and Stolton, 2000; Hockings, 2003). Forest cover loss and fragmentation of habitats, illegal
hunting, extraction of species, and overexploitation of their natural resources threaten the viability of
protected areas worldwide (Hockings, 2003; Miranda et al., 2016). An increasing awareness of the
importance of conservation and surveillance of protected areas has been recognized in many countries,
and supported by national and international agencies, NGOs and academic institutions (Sánchez-
Cordero et al., 2009; Saura et al., 2018).

The Monarch Butter�y Biosphere Reserve (MBBR) was decreed in 2000 to protect the monarch butter�y
(Danaus plexippus) overwintering colonies in Mexico and to contribute to the conservation of the
monarch migratory phenomenon (SEMARNAT, 2001; Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014). The MBBR has
been internationally recognized as an essential component of strategies for the conservation of the
monarch butter�y migratory phenomenon due to the importance of its forests in which monarch
overwintering colonies perch (Calvert et al., 1983; Alonso-Mejía et al., 1997; UNESCO, 2008; Vidal and
Rendón-Salinas, 2014). However, the MBBR has faced continuous forest cover losses (Rendón-Salinas et
al., 2005; Vidal et al., 2013; Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014; Sarkar, 2017). Speci�cally, illegal logging,
forest �res, and diseases causing damage to trees in the reserve are severe problems directly a�ecting
forest cover that have negative impacts on monarch overwintering colonies. Further, the high demand
for legal logging by local communities is also a�ected by these factors and has created social tensions
between stakeholders from local communities and external agents participating in illegal activities
(Honey-Rosés, 2009; Vidal et al., 2013; Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014; Ramirez et al., 2015).

Forest cover loss has negative impacts on environmental services, ecotourism, opportunities for legal
logging and wood extraction, and soil erosion. In addition, watersheds can be irreversibly harmed,
contributing to potentially deleterious changes in microclimate (Rendón-Salinas et al., 2005; Vidal and
Rendón-Salinas, 2014). In response to these problems, several conservation initiatives have been
implemented with respect to the MBBR. For example, the Monarch Butter�y Conservation Trust (also
known as the Monarca Fund) established in 2000, was created by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the
Mexican Fund for Nature Conservation (FMCN) with the �nancial support from the David and Lucile
Packard Foundation, the former Mexican Secretariat for the Environment, Natural Resources and
Fisheries (SEMARNAP), and the States of Michoacan and Estado de Mexico. It consists of a management
tool based on economic incentives for the protection of the MBBR core zone forest habitats and is
owned by stakeholders who have accepted restrictions on their exploitation rights and promoted
conservation programs and ecotourism (Rendón-Salinas et al., 2005; Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014). In
2016, the Mexican Federal Government established an initiative supporting the conservation and
monitoring of the MBBR that included participation by governmental authorities, federal police, NGOs,
and academic institutions (Honey-Rosés et al., 2009). Finally, the trinational initiative promoting the
conservation of the monarch butter�y migratory phenomena sponsored by the Commission for
Environmental Cooperation, was launched in 2015 by the Presidents of Mexico and the United States of
America and the Prime Minister of Canada to ensure the conservation of the monarch butter�y
We use migratory
cookies phenomenon (Trudeau et al., 2016). This initiative involved the creation of a trinational
scienti�c working group for coordinating academic, governmental, and NGOs activities related to the
Our website uses cookies
conservation of the that are necessary
monarch butter�y migratory phenomenon.
for its operation and to improve your Cookies Settings Accept Cookies
In thisYou
experience. study,
canwe examined
review whether
and control forest cover loss decreased since commencement of these
your
Download(/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00167/pdf)
cookies initiatives. Speci�cally,
by clicking on "Accept weCookies"
quanti�ed
or recent
on forest cover losses in the core zones of the MBBR from 2012
"Cookiesto 2018 using satellite images and aerial ortho-photographs complemented with �eld validation for
Settings".
temporal comparisons. Our goals were to (1) compare recent forest cover loss due to climate-related
 factors (wind and rain), and large-scale and small-scale illegal logging between years, and (2) analyze
long-term forest cover
Aboutlosses
us  in theAll
core zones of All
journals thearticles
MBBR by comparing a previous
Submit your researchstudy  Search  Login
(2001–2012, Vidal et al., 2013) with our study (2012–2018).

Frontiers in Environ… Sections  Articles Research Topics Editorial Board About journal 

Materials and Methods

Study Area
The MBBR is located in the border between the States of Michoacan and Mexico along the Transvolcanic
Belt in central Mexico. It was decreed in 2000 and consists of 56,259 ha (SEMARNAT, 2001). The MBBR is
composed of three core zones in which most monarch overwintering colonies occur (Calvert and
Brower, 1986; Rendón-Salinas et al., 2005; Galindo-Leal et al., 2009). A northern core zone is located in
Cerro Altamirano (558 ha), a central core zone (9,671 ha) is located in Sierra de Chincua, Sierra El
Campanario, and Cerro Chivatí-Huacal, and a southern zone (3,339 ha) includes Cerro Pelón (see Vidal
and Rendón-Salinas, 2014). In these core zones use of natural resources is restricted. The MBBR includes
two bu�er zones in which sustainable use of natural resources is allowed, including supervised legal
logging (SEMARNAT, 2001; Galindo-Leal et al., 2009; Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014) (Figure 1). This
protected area holds a high diversity of habitats, including pine forest (Pinus spp.), oyamel forest (Abies
religiosa), pine-oak forest (Quercus spp), oak forest, and cedar forest (Cedrus spp), and has high
biodiversity content including 493 species of vascular plants and 198 species of terrestrial vertebrates
(SEMARNAT, 2001).

Figure 1

FIGURE 1. Location of the Monarch Butter�y Biosphere Reserve (MBBR), along the
border (thick line) of the States of Michoacan and Mexico. The bu�er zones are
depicted in light green, and include areas where sustainable use of natural
resources is allowed by local communities. The core zones of the MBBR are
depicted in dark green, and include areas where use of natural resources is
restricted. Monarch overwintering colonies (monarch sanctuaries) are depicted as a
red monarch logo. The polygons depicted in the bu�er zones represent the
agrarian properties owned by the stakeholders [Registro Nacional Agrario, Mexico
2018 (National Agrarian Records, Mexico 2018)].

(https://www.fron-
tiersin.org/�les
/Articles/457039
Forest Cover Loss
/fenvs-07-00167-
HTML/image_m
Overall, we followed the methods provided by Brower et al. (2002) and Vidal et al. (2013). This analysis
We use cookies
/fenvs-07-00167-
was quanti�ed using satellite Quickbird sensor images (for 2012) and orthophoto images from the core
g001.jpg)
zones of
Our website thecookies
uses MBBR from 2012
that are to 2018. These images were ortho-recti�ed and georeferenced using
necessary
for its ArcMap
operation editing
and totools (see below).
improve your A total of 45 images were obtained
Cookies biennially covering
Settings theCookies
Accept core zones
of the You
experience. MBBR canatreview
a resolution of 30 ×
and control 30 cm for comparison with the orthophoto images. The orthophoto
your
Download(/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00167/pdf)
cookies images (aerialon
by clicking photographs, with the
"Accept Cookies" or Argeomatica
on company) were obtained annually from February
"Cookies2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016, May 2017, and March 2018. The image for 2012 that was used came
Settings".
from a previous study (Vidal et al., 2013). This overlap of imagery allowed visualization of long-term
 trends in forest cover loss in core zones of the MBBR in a continuous year sequence (2001–2018) by
combining both studies. Forest
About us  cover All loss was recorded
journals in a shape�le
All articles in ArcGIS
Submit (v.10.5), allowing
your research  Search  Login
calculation of the arithmetic di�erence of forest cover loss in di�erent habitats (see Vidal et al., 2013;
Vidal and Rendón-Salinas, 2014). A bu�er of 300 meters surrounding the core zones of the MBBR was
Frontiers in Environ…
established Sections 
in the GIS platform. We generated Articles
a grid of Research
hexagons Topics Editorial Board
(16 ha) covering About journal
the core zones of the 

MBBR and bu�er area to compare images biennially.

Visual interpretation was performed using ArcMAP editing tools, “E�ects-Swipe,” which allowed images
to be superimposed and compared. This tool facilitated the visual comparison of the two basic inputs to
quantify forest cover loss. As a rule of interpretation, a screen scale was set to 1:3,000. This scale allowed
a complete visualization of each hexagon of the grid, and ensured homogenization for the analyses
(Vidal et al., 2013). Forest cover loss was estimated for the local communities and the core zones of the
MBBR (Figure 1) (Vidal et al., 2013). Given our scale of analyses (1:3,000), other semi-automated tools in
ArcMap can produce change detection errors, by the amount of topographic shadows that exist on the
ground. We do believe that other ArcMap tools can be implemented in further priority studies of habitat
loss at the MBBR. For example, including forest loss analyses of the remaining areas of the reserve.

Once forest cover loss was located and mapped, we proceeded with �eld validation using a GPS device
con�gured with the exact route and position to the center of each a�ected polygon. Visits were made at
least once to the 39 identi�ed a�ected areas to record evidence of forest cover loss by climate-related
factors (rain and wind) and illegal logging. Speci�cally, we classi�ed forest cover loss into three
categories: (1) climate-related factors due to wind and rain; (2) large-scale illegal logging due to massive
logging carried out by organized delinquent groups; and (3) small-scale illegal logging due to logging of
a few trees by individuals from local communities (see Vidal et al., 2013). Treefall due to illegal logging
was easily detected as they showed clear marks of saw or axes in the stumps. Treefall due to climatic
factors did not show evidence of human activities. The �eld trips included previously trained personnel
to record tree fall according to our classi�cation from the MBBR, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Mexican
Fund for the Conservation of Nature (FMCN), the National Forestry Commission (CONAFOR), the
National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP), Forest Protector (PROBOSQUE), the
Federal O�ce of Environmental Protection (PROFEPA), Institute of Biology, UNAM (IBUNAM), Science
and Community for Conservation AC (CCC), and representatives of agrarian properties.

Results

Forest cover loss totaled 163.44 ha from 2012 to 2018 in the core zones of the MBBR (Figure 1). Forest
cover loss due to climate-related factors was 125.44 ha (77%), large-scale illegal logging, 25.86 ha (15%),
and small-scale illegal logging, 12.14 ha (8%) (Table 1, Figure 2). Forest cover loss due to climate-related
factors peaked at 81.75 ha between 2015 and 2017 in our study; in March 2016, strong winds and rains
produced a peak in treefall (55.21 ha) in the core zones of the MBBR (Table 1, Figure 3). The State of
Michoacan reached higher forest cover loss values due to climate-related factors (94.07 ha) from 2012
to 2018 compared to the State of Mexico (31.37 ha) (Table 1, Figure 3). These values represent 0.23 and
0.63% of the total area in the core zone of each State, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1
We use cookies
Our website uses cookies that are necessary
for its operation and to improve your Cookies Settings Accept Cookies
experience. You can review and control your
Download(/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00167/pdf)
cookies by clicking on "Accept Cookies" or on
"Cookies Settings".