Project Cedar Phase One Report
Project Cedar Phase One Report
Project Cedar Phase One Report
CEDARPhase
One
Report
FALL 2022
Overview
A wCBDC is a specific type of digital bank reserve held at the central bank
that could be used by financial institutions to effect wholesale transactions,
such as interbank payment clearing and settlement. Wholesale CBDCs have
the potential to drive improvement in the larger wholesale market by
facilitating the safe, rapid, and efficient transfer of central bank liabilities.
Enabling technology, such as distributed ledgers, could provide benefits
2
such as transparency, resiliency, and programmability. Central bank liabilities
that can be transferred through these systems in the form of wCBDC have the
potential to drive enhancements to existing payments infrastructure and spur
future payments innovation. Phase I of the Project Cedar experiment examined
the potential application of distributed ledger technology (DLT), specifically
blockchain, to enhance the functioning of wholesale cross-border payments.
3
or wholesale CBDC, nor to offer an indication of how one would necessarily be
designed.
Problem Space
Foreign exchange spot trades are among the most common wholesale
cross-border transactions. These transactions can be conducted bilaterally or
multilaterally between counterparties such as central banks and private sector
financial institutions. The FX market is the largest wholesale market in the world,
2
with daily turnover of over $7 trillion. Given the size and breadth of this global
market, the potential impacts of technological innovation on its operations and
processes are substantial.
Currently, cross-border transactions function well, but there are opportunities for
improvement. In general, it takes around two days for an FX spot transaction to
settle. During these two days, payment senders and recipients are exposed to
settlement, counterparty, and credit risk which, among other things, can hinder
2 See “Triennial Central Bank Survey: Global Foreign Exchange Market Turnover in 2022”,
Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department, October 2022
4
an institution’s ability to readily convert its assets into cash. Additionally, the
proportion of transactions settled on a payment-versus-payment (PvP) basis
has fallen below 40 percent in recent years, increasing settlement risk exposure
across the FX market. 3
Use Case
An FX spot transaction was selected as the use case for the Phase I experiment
for several reasons:
• Asset type: Central bank liabilities (e.g., USD and other foreign
currencies) are the only asset types involved in this type of transaction,
allowing for the simulation of exchange of a hypothetical USD wCBDC
against a hypothetical foreign wCBDC.
• Market structure: The spot exchange of one currency for another is the
foundation of the FX market. This type of trade is often one segment of a
5
broader international financial transaction that may involve other asset
types as well. Demonstrating the viability of this type of transaction
therefore has implications for a significant portion of the wholesale
cross-border market.
To further understand the context for FX spot transactions at the New York Fed
and to validate the working hypothesis and potential solution concept, the NYIC
team conducted interviews with a range of market participants. Ultimately, these
interviews validated the hypothesis that settlement speed and access to PvP
mechanisms are key issues in wholesale cross-border payments. Based on this
research, a future state solution should enable atomic settlement, access to a
wider range of counterparties, and settlement taking place faster than T+2.
6
Experiment Design
CRITICAL
ASSUMPTIONS
1 Issues of speed are
rooted in the settlement
2 Current delays in
settlement times are
3 Current limitations in
access are driven in part
stage of a current state driven in part by by counterparty risk.
FX spot transaction. manual validation of
the transaction.
7
Phase I of Project Cedar was designed to test the hypothesis and critical
assumptions above and to reveal insights related to the wCBDC research
interests of the NYIC. The following objectives were set to meet these goals:
1 Instantaneous settlement
Defined as
Interoperability
Defined as interaction
30 seconds. payment-versus-payment across separate,
settlement in which both homogeneous ledgers to
legs of the transaction are settle the transaction.
settled simultaneously or
not at all.
2
to determine success and
establish a benchmark for
future research.
3
questions and
considerations for future
wCBDC design work.
The scope of Phase I was tailored to demonstrate the key objectives of instant
and atomic settlement in a viable prototype. Phase I also laid the foundation for
future research into interoperability by simulating a multi-ledger ecosystem
across homogeneous ledger technology. To focus on these foundational
objectives, several important research topics were designated as out of scope
for Phase I, including scalability, privacy, and programmability. Additionally,
non-settlement processes, such as market making and AML/OFAC, were
assumed to take place off-ledger and were abstracted for the purposes of the
prototype.
8
Solution Concept
The solution design in Project Cedar Phase I represents a starting point for
future wCBDC research. The Phase I prototype included design choices such
as a permissioned blockchain network, an Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO)
data model, and Rust as the primary programming language. Design choices
made for Phase I will be tested against alternatives in future phases and do not
represent conclusive design choices of the NYIC or of any future U.S. CBDC.
9
The table below outlines key components of the Phase I prototype design:
PROGRAMMING
LANGUAGE Rust
PERMISSION
STRUCTURE Permissioned
SINGLE-LEDGER VS.
MULTI-LEDGER Multi-ledger
CONSENSUS
PROTOCOL Proof-of-Authority
ASSET TRANSFER
MECHANISM Hash Time Lock Contracts (HTLCs)
Results
10
The table below highlights key results across three test scenarios. The
scenarios were designed to assess the system’s performance as it scaled to
include a broader number of simulated actors in the ecosystem. Each test
scenario comprised a specific number of Currencies (C), Observers (O), and
Participants (P), as detailed below.
4 Cross-Chain Swap Latency is defined as the time between transaction broadcast and finalization.
11
Looking Ahead
Phase I of Project Cedar provided crucial input toward the NYIC’s central aim of
technical research on wholesale CBDC in the U.S. context. The work also
highlighted several opportunities for future research by the NYIC, including
ledger design, interoperability, security, and more. Research across these areas
will help inform potential technical design choices and considerations.
As part of its continued wCBDC research, the NYIC will next explore questions
related to interoperability and ledger design, including how to achieve
concurrence and certainty in settlement across different blockchain based
payments systems.
12