Performance Status

of
Common Effluent Treatment Plants
in India

Central Pollution Control Board

October 2005
 CONTRIBUTIONS

Guidance, Planning, and Dr. B. Sengupta, Member Secretary

Principal Coordinators Mr. P. M. Ansari, Additional Director
Mr. Paritosh Kumar, Senior Environmental Engineer

Report preparation Nazim uddin, Environmental Engineer

Monotoring of CETPs CPCB Zonal Office, Bangalore

CPCB Zonal Office, Bhopal
CPCB Zonal Office, Lucknow
CPCB Zonal Office, Varodara
CPCB Zonal Office, Kolkata
PCI-III Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi
Urban Pollution Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi
PCI-I Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi
IFD Division, CPCB Head Office, Delhi

Analysis of samples CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Bangalore

CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Bhopal
CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Lucknow
CPCB Zonal Office Laboratory, Varodara
Wastewater, Laboratory CPCB Head Office, Delhi
 FOREWORD

Mindful of the key role played by SSI units and the constraints in complying
with pollution control norms individually by these units, the Ministry of Environment
and Forests (MoEF), Govt. of India initiated a technical and financial support scheme
to promote common facilities for treatment of effluents generated from SSI units
located in clusters. Under the Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) financial
assistance scheme, 50% subsidy on project capital cost - 25% share each of Central
and State Governments - was provided. As a result, 88 CETPs having total capacity
of 560 MLD have been set up throughout India covering more than 10000 polluting
industries. Considering the coverage of industries under CETPs and the total
pollution load handled by these CETPs, State Pollution Control Boards need to keep
a close watch on their operation. More so because inspection of a large number of
CETPs by Central Pollution Control Board has revealed that, in general, the CETPs
are not performing satisfactorily, largely due to improper operation and maintenance.

This report presents results of performance evaluation studies conducted by

Central Pollution Control Board and discusses several technical issues in relation to
satisfactory operation of CETPs. We hope the information contained in the report
would be useful to all concerned.

Dr. V. Rajagopalan
Chairman
 CONTENTS

1. Introduction 1

2. Classification and distribution 3

3. Technical performance 4

4. Hazardous waste management 8

5. Area / CETP specific issues 10

6. Recommendations 28

Annexure

Table 1: CETPs’ capacity, year of establishment, capital cost and 30

related information

Table 2: CETPs treatment technologies and wastewater collection 34

& disposal system

Table 3: Performance of CETPs in terms of aggregate water quality 39

parameters

Table 4: Metals and special parameters in effluent from CETPs 52

Table 5: Hazardous sludge / solid waste generation and handling in 60

CETPs

Table 6: List of proposed CETPs 65

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Small-scale industries (SSIs) have a very important role in overall industrial development in
India and growth of SSI units has been actively promoted by Government of India to induce
balanced economic growth and to distribute the benefits of industrial development in an
equitable manner. Industries having capital investment up to Rs.10 millions are classified as
SSI units. It is estimated that more than 300,000 SSI units are spread all over India, mainly
in about 867 clusters/industrial estates of the country.

1.2 It is difficult for each industrial unit to provide and operate individual wastewater treatment
plant because of the scale of operations or lack of space or technical manpower. However,
the quantum of pollutants emitted by SSIs clusters may be more than an equivalent large-
scale industry, since the specific rate of generation of pollutants is generally higher because
of the inefficient production technologies adopted by SSIs.

1.3 Keeping in view the key role played by SSI units and the constraints in complying with
pollution control norms individually by these units, The Ministry of Environment and Forests
(MoEF) initiated an innovative technical and financial support scheme to ensure their growth
in an environmentally compatible manner. The scheme promoted common facilities for
treatment of effluents generated from SSI units located in clusters through liberal financial
assistance. The financial assistance provided under this Common Effluent Treatment Plant
(CETP) scheme was as follows:

Central Government subsidy- 25% of the project capital cost,

State Government subsidy- 25% of the project capital cost,

Loans from financial institutions- 30% of the project capital cost, and

Entrepreneurs’ contribution- 20% of the project capital cost.

The CETP scheme was instituted initially for a period of 10 years with effect from the year
1991 but MoEF has decided to continue financial assistance under the scheme beyond this
period. Most of the 88 CETPs constructed and commissioned so far were financed under the
CETP scheme of Govt. of India.
1.4 The concept of CETP was adopted as a way to achieve end-of-pipe treatment of combined
wastewater at lower unit cost than could be achieved by individual industries, and to facilitate
discharge, monitoring and enforcement by environmental regulatory agencies and the
investment of substantial government finances in the CETP scheme was justified on the
basis of potential benefits in terms of pollution reduction and environmental improvements.

1.5 Of the 88 CETPs that have been constructed and commissioned so far in the country, the
Central Pollution Control Board has studied performance of 78 CETPs operating throughout
the country. This report summarizes the findings of various performance evaluation studies
carried out by or on behalf of the Central Pollution Control Board.
2. CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION

2.1 Basic information on the operational CETPs in respect of capacity, year of establishment,
capital cost, name/address of CETP operating agency, treatment scheme, type of industries
in connected industrial area, effluent collection system and effluent disposal point is provided
in Annexure (Tables 1 and Table 2)

2.2 Classification of the operational CETPs on the basis of design capacity is as below:

Design capacity Number of CETPs Number as Combined capacity of Combined capacity

range in the range % of total CETPs in the range, MLD as % of total capacity
> 10 MLD 17 21.8 362.8 64.81
>5 to 10 MLD 14 17.95 105.85 18.91
>1 to 5 MLD 28 35.9 70.75 12.64
0 to 1 MLD 19 24.35 10.185 1.82
Total: 88

2.3 Classification of the operational CETPs on the basis of number of member units is as below:

State Number Information Number of Number of CETPs Number of

of available about CETPs having having >100 to 400 CETPs having
CETPs no. of members <100 members members >400 members
AP 3 3 2 1 0
Delhi 11 11 0 0 11
Gujrat 16 14 6 5 3
Haryana 1 1 0 1 0
Karnataka 2 2 2 0 0
Maharashtra 11 6 2 3 1
MP 1 1 1 0 0
Punjab 2 2 2 0 0
Rajasthan 8 8 4 2 2
Tamilnadu 29 22 21 1 0
UP 3 3 2 1 0
West Bengal 1 1 0 0 1
Total 88 74 42 (57%) 14 (19%) 18 (24%)

2.4 State-wise distribution of CETPs is as below:

State Number of Number as % of Combined capacity of Combined capacity as

CETPs total CETPs, MLD % of total capacity
AP 3 3.4 12.75 2.3
Delhi 11 12.5 133.2 24.1
Gujrat 16 18.2 156.3 28.2
Haryana 1 1.1 1.1 0.2
Karnataka 2 2.3 1.3 0.23
Maharashtra 11 12.5 63.25 11.43
MP 1 1.1 0.9 0.16
Punjab 2 2.3 1.535 0.28
Rajasthan 8 9.1 57.7 10.4
Tamilnadu 29 33 71.15 12.85
UP 3 3.4 44.4 8.0
West Bengal 1 1.1 10 1.81
Total 88 559.770
3. TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

3.1 Overall and treatment stage wise performance of all the CETPs in terms of general
parameters pH, Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD),
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is summarized and provided
in Annexure (Table 3). Sodium (Na) and Chlorides (Cl-) are also shown with general
parameters to indicate nature of TDS.

3.2 Some of the CETPs have also been studied for concentration of toxic metals and special
parameters- Percent sodium (%Na), Sulphates (SO4) and Ammonia (NH3-N) in their raw
influent and treated effluent. These results are provided in Annexure (Table 4)

3.3 Prescribed standards for various parameters for discharge of treated effluents of CETPs into
surface waters and for discharge on land are shown at the end of Tables 3 and Table 4.
Observed values of various parameters in treated effluent have been compared with the
applicable standard based on the ultimate disposal point for each CETP shown in Table 2.
Observed value of various parameters exceeding the prescribed standards in the treated
effluents have been are underlined in the Tables 3 and Tables 4.

3.4 It is observed from the summary of results shown below that of the total 78 CETPs studied,
only 20 (i.e. 25.6%) complied with the prescribed limits for general parameters pH, BOD,
COD and TSS but 15 of these were not able to comply with the prescribed limit for TDS.
Thus, only 5 (i.e. 6.4%) CETPs were complying all general parameters including TDS.

State Number of CETPs complying pH, BOD, CETPs complying pH, BOD, COD and TSS
CETPs studied COD, TSS and TDS standards but not complying TDS standard
by CPCB Number Name Number Name
AP 2 0 0
Delhi 10 3 Mayapuri, GTK, 6 Wazirpur, Mangolpuri, Jhilmil,
Badli SMA, Nangaloi, Okhla I.A
Gujrat 15 0 2 Ankleshwar, Sachin (0.5MLD)
Haryana 1 1* Kundli-I 0
Karnataka 2 0 1 Pai&Pai
Maharashtra 9 0 3 Thane-Belapur, Ambernath,
Patalganga
MP 1 0 0
Punjab 1 1 Phillore 0
Rajasthan 5 0 1 Jodhpur**
Tamilnadu 29 0 2 Thiruvai Karur***, TALCO
Ambur Thuthipet
UP 3 0 0
Total 78 5 (6.4 %) 15 (19.2 %)
*TDS not determined but likely to be within limits; **CETP was under trial; TDS not determined but Cl exceeded;
***TSS not determined
3.5 High TDS in treated effluent is observed to be a widespread problem. Apart from the five
CETPs that complied with TDS as well as other general parameters, only four other CETPs
complied with TDS limits even though these CETPs did not comply with other general
parameters. Thus, in all, 69 (i.e. 88.5%) out of the 78 CETPs did not complied with TDS
standards.

3.6 It is also observed that salinity, primarily due to salts of sodium, is the primary contributor to
the high TDS problem as high TDS is almost invariably accompanied by high Chlorides and
Sodium concentration. TDS reduction is possible by softening process if TDS is mainly due to
salts of divalent cations but if it is mainly due to salts of mono-valent cations then Reverse
Osmosis (RO) is a technical option . However, the concentrate has to be further evaporated
to get the salts in solid form that may be disposed off in secured landfill.

3.7 The TDS concentration of the wastewaters is mainly due to the inorganic ions in the water
supply and those added during the use of water. In industries such as Tanneries,
Pharmaceutical units, Chemicals manufacturing units and Dye & Dye Intermediates units, the
high TDS in wastewaters can be primarily attributed to addition during the use of water. In all
such cases the best approach for reduction of TDS is to try reduction at source by adopting
cleaner technologies for reduction of net input of chemicals, practicing recovery and recycling
of chemicals. The chemical treatment adopted in the treatment scheme at CETP generally
does not specifically aim at removing these ions. Therefore, reduction in the TDS
concentration of the effluent during its treatment is not expected.

3.8 It is observed from the unit-wise performance data of various CETPs that poor performance
of primary- and secondary-settling units is an important factor responsible for overall poor
performance of CETPs. The efficiency of treatment by the physico-chemical process is
decided by the TSS concentration in the effluent of primary settling unit. Similarly, one of the
main requirements for successful operation of secondary biological unit is the effective
settling of the mixed liquor in secondary settling unit for recycling of biological sludge and
providing clarified effluent. Treatment schemes of almost all the CETPs employ primary
settling as one treatment unit and secondary biological treatment is also employed in most of
the schemes. Sub-level performance of primary and secondary settling units has been
observed in a large number of CETPs.

3.9 A well performing primary settling unit is expected to achieve <50 mg/L TSS in its effluent and
in no case it should exceed 100 mg/L limit. Similarly, a well performing secondary settling unit
easily provides an effluent having <50 mg/L TSS. It is observed that of the 44 primary settling
 units studied in different CETPs, 35 were performing poorly as the TSS in effluent of these
units exceeded 50 mg/L, 30 units even did not meet 100 mg/L limit. It is further observed that
of the 51 secondary settling units studied in different CETPs, 35 were performing poorly as
TSS in effluent of these units exceeded 50 mg/L, 30 units even did not meet the prescribed
standard of 100 mg/L. This indicates that there is scope for improvement of the performance
of CETPs by paying attention to the performance of settling units. Things which require
investigations include optimizing the chemical doses, proper flocculation, proper sludge
withdrawal frequency and duration, avoiding short-circuiting in the tank, assessing surface
overflows, solids loading and weir loading, adjusting optimum re-circulation rate in secondary
settling tank.

3.10 In two CETPs of Andhra Pradesh, the Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF) units are not able to
give any significant reduction in organic matter or suspended solids. Replacement of DAF
unit with a primary settling unit in Pattancheru CETP, where no primary settling tank exists,
and discontinuation of use of DAF unit in Jeedimetla CETP, where it is installed ahead of
primary settling tank, may be considered for improving efficiency of primary treatment and
reducing operational costs. An effective primary physico-chemical treatment is also expected
to improve overall COD removal efficiency as high COD and TDS in treated effluent is a
major problem in these two CETPs of Andhra Pradesh.

3.11 Dual Media Filter (DMF) unit, which has been employed in treatment schemes of CETPs in
Delhi and at few other places and sand filter unit which has been employed in CETPs of
textile units in Tamilnadu are normally used to improve suspended solids level from near 50
mg/L in primary settling unit’s effluent to near 10 mg/L. Incidentally, it also reduces the
organic matter associated with the suspended matter so removed. It may also remove a
small fraction of organic matter associated with colloidal matter that is coagulated and filtered
during filtration. Filter units should not be depended upon to perform more than the expected
function, as explained. If DMF unit or a rapid sand filter unit is over loaded, it will require
frequent backwashing.

3.12 Activated Carbon Filter (ACF) unit, which has been employed in treatment schemes of
CETPs in Delhi and at few other places is only meant for removing trace organics, such as
pesticides, phenols, etc., and heavy metals, which escape the primary treatment and
therefore should not be loaded with bulk organic matter. If any treatment scheme, with ACF
as its terminal treatment unit, is aimed at achieving an overall efficiency so as to give the final
effluent quality of BOD<30 mg/L and COD<250 mg/L, then ACF unit is most likely to be
subjected to high COD, or even high BOD, thereby resulting in an early exhaustion of its
 activated carbon bed. Therefore, in treatment schemes aimed to achieve this quality, ACF as
a terminal treatment unit can be said to be a misfit because very frequent replacement or
regeneration of the bed is neither easy nor economically affordable.

3.13 Most of the CETPs in textile units of Tirupur and Karur have employed treatment scheme
having physico-chemical treatment followed by sand filtration and stabilization tank. Only a
few have adopted treatment scheme having biological secondary treatment. CETPs of the
former type require special efforts in optimizing chemical dozing for their greater dependency
on physico-chemical treatment.

3.14 Treatment schemes of Odhav CETP (Gujrat), Nandesari CETP (Gujrat), Sarigam CETP
(Gujrat), Dhareshwar CETP (Gujrat), Sachin-II CETP (Gujrat) have three-stage treatment and
that of Tarapur CETP (Maharashtra) has four-stage treatment but still these plants were not
meeting standards. This reflects gross neglect in operation. If biological treatment units are
properly operated and full attention is paid to proper settling at different stages of treatment
as explained in section 3.8 above, performance of these plants could be greatly improved.
4. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

4.1 Information on hazardous waste generation, handling, storage and disposal practices in
CETPs is given in Annexure (Table 5). State wise scenario is given below:

Andhra Pradesh: Hazardous waste generated from one CETP (Jeedimelta) is stored within
CETPs’ premises and other CETP (Pattancheru) is member in TSDF at Dindigul

Delhi: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs’ premises and no
common hazardous waste disposal facility has been developed. A common temporary
hazardous waste storage facility is being developed and is expected to be in use by
December 2005. The hazardous waste storage provided at CETP Wazirpur had been filled
up and large quantity of hazardous sludge removed from the CETP was kept at the site for
temporary hazardous waste facility which has been taken away for disposal at unknown
place.

Gujrat: Hazardous waste of 9 CETPs disposed of in Common Hazardous Waste Treatment,

Storage and Disposal Facilities (CHWTSDF) Hazardous waste of remaining 7 CETPs is
stored within CETPs’ premises.

Haryana: Hazardous waste generated from CETP is stored within CETP’s premises and no
scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.

Karnataka: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs’ premises and
no common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed.

Maharashtra: Hazardous waste of 6 CETPs disposed of in Common Hazardous Waste

Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities (CHWTSDF) Hazardous waste of remaining 7
CETPs is stored within CETPs’ premises.

MP: Hazardous waste generated from CETP is discharged into drain and no scientific
hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed. Thus the purpose of
removal of pollutants is defeated.

Punjab: Hazardous waste generated from one CETP is stored within CETP’s premises and
other CETP is un-operational. No common scientific hazardous waste treatment and disposal
facility has been developed.
Rajasthan: Hazardous waste generated from CETPs is stored within CETPs’ premises or
discharged on land elsewhere. No common scientific hazardous waste treatment and
disposal facility has been developed.

Tamilnadu: Hazardous waste of 4 CETPs disposed of in secured landfill within their

premises, of 2 other CETPs is stored on an impervious common place and of the remaining
23 CETPs is stored within CETP’s premises. No other common scientific hazardous waste
treatment and disposal facility has been developed.

UP: Hazardous waste generated from 2 CETPs is stored within CETPs’ premises and from
Kanpur CETP is disposed of on land by civic authorities. No other common scientific
hazardous waste treatment and disposal facility has been developed

West Bengal: Temporary hazardous waste storage facility is under construction for Calcutta
Leather Complex. A secured landfill site is also proposed.
5. AREA / CETP SPECIFIC ISSUES

5.1 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Andhra Pradesh

Jeedimetla (JETL) CETP: Colored and high TDS effluents from different dye and dye
intermediate and chemical industries are received by this CETP. The quantity of effluent
received is about 1000-1200 m3/D. It provides chemical flocculation as primary treatment,
storage at buffer tank and followed by biological oxidation after mixing with municipal sewage
with the ratio of 1:1.6. The CETP has been successful in treating organic matter (BOD) but
discharge more TDS into the sewage system that joins with Amberpet Sewage Treatment
Plant. Although to a lesser extent Multi Stage Evaporator System was in operation, yet the
CETP was discharging high TDS (15,000 mg/L) in the liquid effluent. Mixing of industrial
effluent with sewage thus makes the total effluent unfit for use for irrigation.

Performance of Amberpet STP is not satisfactory. It merely allows the wastewater for two
hours sedimentation and discharge. More than 50% of the received wastewater are bypassed
in the unit and sold to the nearby farmers on charge basis by the Water and Sewerage
Board. JETL also charged for discharging the treated effluent into the STP.

Patancheru (PETL) CETP: The CETP receives effluents mainly from pharmaceutical and
other chemical industries and sewage of BHEL Township through tankers and operates a
two-stage ASP system employing pure oxygen system. The pure oxygen storage facility
exists with in the plan premises. Diffused Air Floatation (DAF) is the primary treatment, which
removes suspended solids and part of organic and inorganic pollutants. Although the organic
matter (BOD) treated to the satisfactory level, yet very high level of TDS generally escape the
treatment process. APPCB has also allowed individual unit to discharge COD and TDS upto
15,000 mg/l into the CETPs. The reduction in TDS is to the extent of the industrial effluents
are diluted by sewage. The TDS levels as high as 7000 mg/l are discharged into a small
channel, although the disposal into a sewage treatment plant is in progress in the form of a
pipeline. The hazardous sludge is dumped into the landfill site. APPCB shall either reconsider
reducing the TDS limits for industrial discharge into the CETPs and /or installation of
RO/Nano System followed by MSES so as to contain TDS at the CETP and thus protecting
the water resources. Else it may turn out to be yet another Tirupur.

Bollaram CETP: This CETP has been closed down now. The CETP was having 24
members. Dr. Reddy Laboratory was one of the members and a major contributor to the
 CETP. This unit set up its own ETP that became the main reason for closure of the CETP.
All the member units have switched over to PETL or JETL.

5.2 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Delhi

There are 28 recognised industrial estates in Delhi. In order to mitigate the environmental
hazards due to discharge of untreated effluents, the Honour’ble Supreme Court directed
Delhi Govt. to build common effluent treatment plants (CETPs). The Delhi Government
entrusted the work to Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) who contracted with
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) in 1996 for the design of
CETPs for the industrial estates. NEERI proposed 15 CETPs, their designs and locations,
some of them receiving wastewater from more than one industrial estate. Construction of ten
CETPs has been completed, two is in progress and three are in abeyance.

Performance of CETPs in Delhi at full design load

A comprehensive performance evaluation of the CETPs of Delhi was taken up in two phases
from June 27 to July 6 and from August 25 to 28, 2005 to assess their capability for effecting
treatment at full capacity during their operation. NEERI carried out jar tests at each CETP to
optimize the chemical doses before operation for performance evaluation. During the study,
stage-wise performance of treatment was determined. The CETPs having physico-chemical
treatment were studied at the full design surface loading rates of tube settlers, DMF and ACF
beds but for 9 hours only. The Mangolpuri CETP, which employs biological process, was
evaluated at half the design flow, which is the present flow. The plant is being operated at this
flow on a continuous basis. Samples were collected after 2 hours of starting the run, every
hour, for the next 7 hours except for Okhla Industrial Area CETP where the sampling had to
be stopped after 4 hours due to non-availability of flow. Samples were collected at five points
i.e. before equalization, after equalization, tube settler, DMF and ACF. The composite
samples of effluent after equalization and final treated effluent, prepared on equal volume
basis, were analyzed for various parameters as prescribed in treated effluent quality for
CETPs. Samples collected at other two points i.e. after tube settler and DMF were analyzed
for pH, BOD, COD, TSS and TDS. The main conclusions and recommendations of the CPCB
study are as follows:

a. GT Karnal Road, Mayapuri and Badli CETPs are meeting the notified standards.
Mangolpuri, SMA, Nangaloi, Wazirpur and Okhla I.A CETPs are not complying in terms of
TDS only. Lawrence Road CETP is not complying in terms of BOD and SS. It is felt that
Lawrence Road CETP was not able to meet the standards in terms of BOD due to high level
of organic matter in the influent

b. DMF and ACF units were included in the CETPs to improve the effluent quality
beyond what is required under the notified standards. It was observed that in general the
performance of these units was sub-optimal.

c. The efficiency of treatment by the physico-chemical process can also be gauged by

the TSS concentration after the tube settler. If 100 mg/L TSS concentration is assumed as a
practical limit in the effluent from the tube settler, Mangolpuri, Okhla I. A. and SMA CETPs
failed this criterion. This indicates that there is scope for improvement of the performance of
tube settlers by optimizing the chemical doses and flocculation. The sub-level performance of
the tube settlers could also be due to in sufficient cleaning of the tubes, improper sludge
withdrawal or short-circuiting in the tank, which can be investigated.

d. The advanced level treatment units, dual media filter (DMF) and activated carbon
adsorption (ACA) bed, are meant to polish the final effluent. Removal of TSS by DMF
reduces not only the TSS in the final effluent but also its BOD and COD concentration, which
is associated with the organic fraction of TSS. The ACA is used to remove trace organics,
such as pesticides, phenols, etc., and heavy metals, which escape the primary treatment. It is
seen that wherever the TSS input to the DMF is more than 100 mg/L the final effluent also
has a high TSS concentration. Likewise, the ACA bed also should not be loaded with bulk
organic matter. It seems that wherever the input COD to DMF is more than 100 mg/L, the
BOD and COD of the final effluent is more than that which is expected from advanced level
treatment units (COD<30 mg/L). Application of large amounts of COD to ACA bed would also
result in an early exhaustion of its treatment capacity.

e. The TDS concentration of the effluents is mainly due to the inorganic ions in the
water supply and those added during the use of water. The chemical treatment adopted in
the treatment scheme does not specifically aim at removing these ions, except that which is
incidental to neutralization. Therefore any appreciable change in the in the TDS concentration
of the effluent during its treatment is not seen. The TDS concentration in the influent to the
Wazirpur, Mangolpuri, Jhilmil, Okhla I.A. and SMA CETPs is more than 3,000 mg/L high and
consequently the final does not meet the prescribed limit of 2,100 mg/L.

f. The effluent of the CETPs meet the standards for heavy metals, which were
determined and cyanide, for both irrigation and discharge in surface waters.
CETP wise comments on conveyance system

Wazirpur CETP(24 MLD: The wastewater from the industrial estate is collected in an open
drain near the CETP. The flow in the drain was measured to be around 35 MLD. DJB has laid
a new conveyance system for industrial effluent but it has not been commissioned because
the terminal pumping station is yet to be constructed by DSIDC. A large JJ slum cluster
having around 50,000 inhabitants also contributes wastewater. This flow should be
segregated. In case the flow to the CETP, after segregation of flows from non-industrial origin
is found to be more than 24 MLD, which is the design capacity of the CETP, the plant
capacity should be augmented.

Mangolpuri CETP (2.4 MLD): About 1.2 MLD effluent was reaching CETP. Effluent from
both Phase I and Phase II is reaching the CETP. Activated sludge process is used but
effluent from both PST and SST contains a high concentration of SS.

Mayapuri CETP (24 MLD): About 6 MLD effluent was reaching CETP. Sewage from
residential localities other than Mayapuri industrial area has been now diverted. Drains in
Mayapuri area were under construction; more flow is expected from the area.

Lawrence Road CETP (12 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP.About 3
MLD flow was estimated flowing in several open drains leading to Sahkurbasti drain.

Jhilmil CETP (16.8 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP from Jhilmil
industrial area. DJB had laid a new conveyance system in the Friends Colony industrial area
but was yet to be fully connected to CETP. Conveyance system had not been laid in few
lanes of the Friends Colony industrial area. A cluster of industries North of GT road near
Sansar factory was still not connected to the CETP.

Badli CETP (12 MLD): A new conveyance system for the area had been laid. The flow in the
main drain was 3.0 MLD. At a number of places in the collection system the pH of the effluent
varied between 2 and 6 indicating that the individual ETPs of some units where pH correction
and separation of sludge is carried out were not working. The old collection system was
severely damaged due to the acidic effluents. There was water logging and ponding of
effluents at several places

Okhla Industrial Area CETP (24 MLD): About 2 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP.
Effluent from industries of Phase I from industries located on west side of the Sarita Vihar
 drain was being discharged into Sarita Vihar drain. Untapped effluent also flows in an open
drain near Z-Block in Phase II. It is estimated that if total effluent generated from Phase I and
Phase II is tapped then more flow will reach CETP.

GT Karnal Road CETP (6 MLD): About 3 MLD effluent was reaching the CETP. Most of the
industries were connected to conveyance system.

SMA CETP (12 MLD): Only 0.5 to 1.0 MLD flow was reaching the CETP, which was to
receive effluent from SMA, SSI and Rajasthan Udyog Nagar industrial areas. Most of the
drains in the industrial areas were choked and the effluent was seeping into the ground.
Large-scale water logging was observed on roads and open spaces in SSI and SMA
industrial areas. There were large cesspools on both sides of the Delhi-Panipat railway line.

Nangaloi CETP (12 MLD): The CETP was receiving effluents from Udyog Nagar and
Nangloi industrial area and was operational with 1.5 MLD flow. Some units of Nangloi
industrial area and Udyog Nagar industrial area were discharging effluent on the railway land
and in an open unlined drain. It is expected that once the collection system is cleaned and
made operational the flow will increase.

5.3 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Harayana

Kundli CETP, Sonipat: Kondli CETP at Industrial Estate-Kundli treats effluents from
Milk/food processing, textile dyeing, rubber, and leather units. The treated effluent is
discharged into municipal drain and the sludge is kept within the CETP premises. Influent
flow was low, about 60% of the designed flow. More polluted wastewater was received at
CETP but by-passed. Plant achieved designed efficiency but on very high cost due to high
energy consumption. The inlet feed pump not commensurate with actual (less flow). O&M
cost is neither agreed nor paid by the members. With members backing out the plant actually
receives only sewage, Onsite testing facility not available although space exists. The O& M
Cost had increased phenomenally. The Industries’ Association non-existent, primary
responsibility of CETP operation was at stake. Member units were (practically) backing out
from CETP. Untreated or partially treated wastewater from (member) industries received at
CETP was by-passed where as their combined sewage is treated
5.4 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Gujrat and Maharashtra

Most of the CETPs in Gujarat and Maharashtra were non-compliant to prescribed norms
mainly due to various shortfalls occurred right from designing stage to operational stage of
CETPs. Few of them are discussed below.

Shortfall in Design and Construction Part:

Influent characteristics and hydraulic load are not representative of actual design criteria. For
example, in Vapi, Gujarat the design concentration of influent COD is 1000mg/l but actual
influent concentration of COD is more than 3000mg/l. This has happened mainly due to
improper database, industries were not responsive in database preparation at design stage
of CETP. Also frequent change of product particularly in small-scale sector is another
serious problem in maintaining influent characteristics as per design criteria of CETP. Similar
trend is observed in case of other CETPs too.

Many important parameters like NH3 – N, Phenol and other toxicants including heavy metals
were not included into the design aspects of CETP, resulting in improper treatment and non-
compliance of prescribed norms. Toxic effluents some time destroy whole biomass of CETP.

Most of the CETPs particularly in Gujarat were commissioned within a short period of time
without conducting proper treatability study of influent. It is indeed another major shortfall in
designing a proper and effective CETP.

Modular design of ETP is an important concept in proper handling of variable hydraulic load.
Unfortunately, except in few CETPs, no CETP has modular arrangement.

Due to absence of adequate equalization capacity and guard pond, CETPs are not able to
contain shock load. To avoid such shock load CETPs are forced to bypass its effluent
without any treatment. However, many CETPs off late either augmenting their existing
equalization tank or commissioning additional equalization tank to handle shock load.

Shortfall in operation & Maintenance part:

Due to improper operation of CETPs by unskilled or semiskilled operator, flooding of

clarifiers, irregular removal of sludge from clarifiers, improper level of MLVSS in aeration
tank, overloading of sludge drying beds etc are the common phenomenon in CETPS. Entire
system sometimes gets halt because of such poor maintenance.

Vapi CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 03.01.2005 the treated effluent
was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TDS, NH3-N, SO4 and Chlorides.
Effluent was overflowing from sludge beds and housekeeping was poor.

Nandesari CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 20/21.09.2004, the
treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD and TSS but COD,
Chlorides, SO4 and TDS were exceeding the limit. COD level (295 mg/L) was slightly higher
than standard of 250 mg/l. The sludge drying beds were found full. The effluent collection
system is not fool proof.

Ankleshwar CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 18/19.11.2004, the
treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD, and TSS but TDS
was exceeding the limit. Besides, NH3-N level (56 mg/L) was also beyond limit of 50 mg/L
The sludge was being dumped in open yard with impervious layer. The effluent collection
system is not fool proof. Special measures for reduction for NH3-N and TDS are required.

Sachin (0.5 MLD) CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 11.01.2005, the
treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD and TSS but TDS
was exceeding the limit. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.

Sachin (50 MLD) CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 11.01.2005, only
primary treatment units were operational whereas the secondary treatment units are under
commissioning. The final effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD,
TDS and Chlorides.

Sarigum CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 3/4.01.2005, the treated
effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TDS and NH3-N. The
effluent collection system is not fool proof and therefore the plant receives very less flow.

Dhareshwar CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 19.01.2005, the
treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD and COD. CETP does not
have laboratory facility. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.
Jetpur CETP (Gujrat): The plant receives 70% industrial effluent from member units and
30% city sewage. At the time of inspection of the plant on 19.01.2005, the treated effluent
was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS and NH3-N. CETP does
not have laboratory facility. The effluent collection system is not fool proof.

Panoli CETP (Gujrat): At the time of inspection of the plant on 23/24.09.2004, the treated
effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, Chlorides, and
NH3-N. The sludge was being dumped in open land with impervious layer. The effluent
collection system is not fool proof.

Dombivelli CETP Phase-I (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on
17.02.2005, the sludge drying beds were found full and there was no space left for fresh
sludge. Leakages of effluent were also observed from secondary clarifier and pipeline
conveying effluent to bio filter. Over-all house keeping was unsatisfactory.

Dombivelli CETP Phase-II (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on
17.02.2005, the surface aerators were being replaced therefore samples collected are not
representative of normal operation conditions.

Thane-Belapur CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on

16.02.2005, the treated effluent was meeting the standards in terms of pH, BOD, COD, and
TSS but TDS was exceeding the limit. Besides, NH3-N level (63 mg/L) was also beyond limit
of 50 mg/L even though NH3-N level in raw effluent was only 43 mg/L.

Tarapur CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of last inspection of the plant on 26/27.10.2004,
the treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of COD, TSS, TDS, NH3-N and
SO4. Inspecting team also suspected dilution of waste with fresh water by operating agency.

Taloja CETP (Maharashtra): At the time of recent inspection of the plant on 16.02.2005, the
treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD, TSS, TDS, NH3-N,
Chlorides and SO4 . At the time of inspection, two surface aerators were under maintenance
therefore samples collected are not representative of normal operation conditions. The plant
does not have auxiliary power supply.
5.5 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in MP

Govindpura CETP (MP): At the time of monitoring of the plant on 24/25.11.2004, the the
treated effluent was not meeting the standards in terms of BOD, COD and TSS. One
brewery unit contributes about 995 KLD of wastewater. In the treatment scheme, no sludge
drying beds have been provided and no secondary settling tank has been employed after
aeration tank, the terminal treatment unit. Modifications in treatment scheme seem
necessary. The plant does not have auxiliary power supply.

5.6 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Punjab

Phillore CETP: The Phillore CETP uses anaerobic filter followed by ASP for treatment of
effluent mainly from tannery units and have an inflow capacity of 0.035 MLD. The CETP is
located at Ramdaspura Noormahal Road Phillore in Jalandhar District. 28 units are the
members of the CETP. The treated effluent goes to STP-Phillore and the sludge is being kept
within the CETP premises. Dr Ambedkar Leather Association is running the CETP. The
capital cost in 1996 was 28 lakhs.

Jalandhar CETP: The ASP based Jalandhar CETP at Leather Complex Jalandhar has an
inflow of 1.5 MLD for treatment of effluent mainly from tannery units. The treated effluent is
discharged into open drain (Kala Singha) and the sludge is being disposed of
indiscriminately. PSIEC is entrusted with the operation, and maintenance of the CETP. The
Jalandhar CETP is currently under stabilization as it was closed for over two years. The CLRI
recommended construction of Primary Effluent Treatment Plants (PETPs). 29 units are the
members of the CETP. Many units do not have PETPs and some are also not operating them
properly. Most of them are not capable of complying prescribed primary standards as per
CLRI. Some of the tannery units are also refusing to obtain consent under the Water Act.
There is a mismatch in the estimated and actual wastewater generation from individual units.
The PSIEC also does not own any responsibility to operate the plant so as to comply the
prescribed standards. The matter is sub-judice in reference to Civil Writ Petition No CWP No
5307 of 2000 in the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court filed by the member units of
CETP. Most of the industries are operational and highly polluted combined wastewater from
tanneries is discharged, into a municipal drain (Kala Singha drain), which ultimately meets R.
Satluj. It was understood that in the 20 km stretch of the drain the wastewater is partly utilized
in irrigation by farmers. This brings up a very serious environmental situation. Punjab
Pollution Control Board should plead with the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana for
taking cognizance of hazards associated with discharge of untreated tannery wastewater. Till
 such time the case is resolved, the industries are required to either completely closedown or
immediately stop chrome tanning.

5.7 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Rajasthan

Balotra CETP: CETP Balotra is of 6 MLD capacity, however it received 12 MLD influent. As
a result, 6 MLD was being discharged directly in to the river, without any treatment. The
reason for inadequate capacity is the increase in the number of water polluting industries to
600 from 319 at the time when the feasibility study was conducted by NEERI. Majority of
industries are cotton textile processing units comprising mainly of dyeing and printing. The
major process are desizing, scouring, bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing, printing and finishing.
The cost of Rs.2.95 crores was borne by the trust with the help of Ministry of Textiles. No
grant was availed from MoEF. The CETP has been operated and maintained by Balotra
Water Pollution Control & Research Foundation Trust (BWPCRFT). The BWPCRFT is
establishing another 12 MLD CETP (Physico-chemical treatment + biological) at Balotra. It
was in initial stage of construction.

The CETP was not achieving the designed efficiency level. The CETP was not initially
designed with O&G separator. The O&G separator had been added to the CETP but was not
working properly. There were two floating type aerators provided in the equalization tank but
were not working properly. Effluent from primary and secondary settling tanks mostly over
flowed because of launder problem resulting into total submergence of weirs. The launder’s
overflow goes to the aeration tank. Waste papers and foam goes to the flocculator and not
cleaned regularly. During the power cut the CETP does not run, as there is no backup.
Chemical and biological sludge is removed once in a day. Both types of sludges were
dumped together, all the sludge drying beds were full, the dried sludge was dumped
unscientifically within the CETP premises and covered with a polythene partially.

Jasol CETP: The Jasol CETP was not commissioned till during December 2004 when last
inspected. The 2.5 MLD CETP was constructed for treating wastewater from the 60 textile
dyeing and printing industries by Jasol Water Polluting Control & Treatment Trust with a
capital cost of Rs.2.89 crores. It was a 100% grant. The CETP was designed by NEERI
and construction and commissioning by Air Effodetox Incineration Ltd., Mumbai. It was
commissioned on 15.10.2004 for trial run with the DG set for three days. Permanent
electrical connection from the State Electricity Board was awaited. The entire industrial
effluent was being discharged in to the Luni River without any treatment. The
commissioning of the plant was expected by the end of January 2005.
Bithuja CETP: The Bithuja CETP was not commissioned till during December 2004 when
last inspected. The 30 MLD CETP was under construction for treating the effluent from 161
textile bleaching and mercerizing units at Bithuja Industrial Area. The capital cost has been
estimated as 11.5 crorers. The treatment system consists of screen chamber, grit chamber,
equalization tank, primary settling, sludge drying beds and waste stabilization ponds. The
effluent was being discharged in to river Luni without any treatment.

Jodhpur CETP: The 20 MLD CETP at Sangaria has been established by Jodhpur
Pradushan Niwaran Trust at a cost of Rs.10.0 crores at Industrial Area, jodhpur to treat the
wastewater from 150 textile units and 100 stainless steel rolling mills. The CETP was
designed by NEERI, construction and commissioned by Hydro Air Technonic Pvt. Ltd.,
Mumbai. It was commissioned in July 2004, but could not be stabilized due to faulty blower
till December 2004 when last inspected. As a result it was not being operated continuously.
The treatment system consists of screen chamber, grit chamber, separate equalization tanks
for acidic and alkaline waste, flash mixer, clariflocculator, aeration tank (diffused aerators),
secondary settling tank, sand and activated carbon filters and sludge decanter. Separate
channels have been constructed for carrying wastewater from textile units to CETP. Closed
pipeline has been laid for carrying wastewater from rolling mills (stainless steel) to CETP.
The effluent flow measured was 12 MLD. Alkaline to acidic effluent flow was in the ratio of
3:1. pH of alkaline effluent was 8 and that of acidic effluent was 1.

Bhiwadi CETP: The Bhiwadi CETP with a capacity of 6 MLD has been provided by RIICO in
RIICO Industrial Area for the treatment of combined industrial and domestic wastewater. As
estimated, 2.5 MLD of industrial effluent will be treated along with 3.5 MLD of domestic
effluent. Around 50-55 industries will be contributing its effluent to CETP along with domestic
effluent from the industrial area as well as from the city. On the day of inspection, the CETP
was under trial run. The CETP was likely to be handed-over to RIICO by November 2004.

Pali CETPs: There are three CETPs in pali having installed capacity 23 MLD were treating
about 9 MLD mixed industrial waste and sewage, and still about 10-20% of the effluent
generated from Pali city was being discharged without any treatment. At the time of
inspection on 03.07.2002 CETP Unit-I was found closed since March 2000 due to unknown
reasons and capacity utilization for both Unit-II and Unit-III was 60% only. More than 50% of
the effluent reaching CETP I & II was being let out through the emergency outlet to join the
River Bandi. There was no proper arrangement for safe disposal of about 300 MT/month
hazardous sludge and it was being dumped at Puniyata road near CETP-III. Treated
effluents of CETPs were not meeting the standards.
 Machheri CETP, Jaipur: The Machheri CETP was closed during inspection because the
five member tanneries, which process raw hides had been closed by SPCB on account of
not providing the primary treatment for soak liquor. Biomass was being developed for restart
of the CETP. There are 9 tanneries connected to CETP, four processing wet blues to
finished leather only. There was no arrangement for disposal of hazardous sludge.

5.8 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in Tamilnadu

There are thirty-three CETPs in Tamil Nadu. During the current financial year, a total of 26
CETP(s) in Tirupur, Karur and Vellore districts in Tamil Nadu were monitored. The salient
features highlighting issues connected to CETP(s) are listed as below:

Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs), Tirupur:

i. A total of eight CETP(s) handle the industrial waste waters from 281 units (Textile) with
capacities ranging from 1.5 to 10 MLD and discharge the treated waste waters into river
Noyyal which ultimately gets impounded in Orathupalayam dam. The dam water is meant to
be used as irrigation water.

ii. The results of analysis clearly show that the CETP(s) have been designed towards
primary treatment only using lime, alum and poly-electrolytes as coagulation agents.

iii. The incoming TDS in the ETP range between 6000-9000 mg/l and slight increase was
noticed in the treated effluents, perhaps due to soluble fractions of coagulants during
treatment. As such CETP(s) remove only the colour and other suspended organic matter.

iv. As against standard (2100 mg/l) for TDS, the existing TDS levels above 5000 mg/l is a
severe gross violation. The Noyyal River and ground water survey in Tirupur shows that TDS
has grossly contaminated the waters. As such the water is not fit for irrigation in the
downstream stretches.

v. The CETP(s) remove only 40% of the COD, BOD and most of the time the BOD of the
treated waste waters is above 100 mg/l as against limiting standard of 30 mg/l for discharge
into river waters. This is yet another non-compliance by the CETP(s).
vi. It is generally seen that Sodium (Na+) and Chloride (Cl-) ions dominate in the
wastewaters indicating use of common salt (NaCl) in the dyeing processes. Relatively lower
levels of Sulphates (SO4--) indicate that Sodium Sulphate (Na2SO4) is used to a much lesser
extent.

vii. Generally Sodium Chloride is recoverable (50-70%) from Dye bath solutions using nano
filtration membranes and recovered Brine is reusable in dyeing processes along with low
hardness water recovered through Reverse Osmosis processes. Almost 33 individual Units
are in the process of installing R.O./Nano Systems followed by Multi Stage evaporator
systems (MSES) to attain zero discharge from these Units.

viii. In order to reverse the ecological damages in the area, the existing CETP(s) shall also
require upgradation in terms of R.O/Nano systems followed by MSES to constrain high TDS
discharges into the river. The approximate expenditure towards this has been worked out as
high as 126 crores Indian Rupees and almost 35 crores for routing operation and
maintenance of these systems.

ix. It is worthwhile to mention that all the CETP(s) in Tamil Nadu has enjoyed part funding
from Government of India (MoEF) and failed to keep pollution under control.

x. South Zonal Office of CPCB is interacting with companies that may deliver 97% of NaCl
recovery which shall help in alleviating the need for a MSES (which is expensive to operate)
in CETP(s).

Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs), Karur:

Yet another 8 Nos of CETP(s) are in operation at Karur where primarily yarn dyeing is
prevailing. The treated effluents are being discharged into river Amaravati basin, which is a
tributary to river Cauvery. The salient features are given below:

i) The design of CETP(s) is similar to that of CETP(s) in Tirupur and as such fail to
constrain TDS during treatment process. Though not many complaints are arising from the
area, yet the ground and surface waters may be subjected to gradual increase in TDS and
shortly the Tirupur scenario could be repeated.
ii) An action plan as a preventive strategy shall be formulated and implemented on the lines
of CETP(s) at Tirupur by TNPCB. The common salt (NaCl) recovered shall be reusable in the
dye house.

iii) Huge quantities of hazardous CETP sludges are being stored in CETP premises that
require safe disposal.

Common Effluent Treatment Plants CETPs), Vellore:

There are 10 nos of CETP(s) in operation in the Vellore district and handling industrial
effluents from Tannery sector and discharging treated effluents in Palar river basin. There is
no water flow in River Palar at present due to construction of many water reservoirs across
the tributaries in AP and Karnataka. Due to high permeability of riverbed, the treated effluents
infiltrate into the soil and almost little (or no) discharge is visible in the river. The salient
features are listed as below:

i) Generally there are three types of wastewater from tanneries i.e soaking effluent,
chromium effluent and other wastewater. Soaking wastewater containing high TDS is
commonly allowed for solar evaporation either in the premises or at CETPs.

ii) It is reported that about 600 and odd numbers of tannery units are in operation in the
District of Vellore. Most of the tanneries are linked with CETPs and some are having
individual effluent treatment plants. The effluents are generally high in TDS and BOD and
CETP(s) also receives chromium in significant concentrations.

iii) The designed capacities of the CETPs are ranging from 1000 m3/D to 4400 m3/D. The
CETP comprising collection/equalization tank, Chemical flocculation, primary clarifier,
anaerobic lagoon/aeration tank, secondary clarifier and sludge filter (Mechanical filter). Some
of the CETPs are having centralized solar evaporation systems for evaporating high TDS
effluents and some are having Chrome Recovery Plant (CRP).

iv) Only a few CETPs are meeting the standards in terms of BOD and none of the CETPs
are meeting the standard in terms of TDS as stipulated by Tamil Nadu Pollution Control
Board. None of the CETPs have been issued either Consent Order or direction by TNPCB.

v) As per the direction of Hon’ble Supreme Court, all the units generating the sludge out of
ETP operation should be disposed with in the premises by providing a secured land fill as per
 the guidelines and norms stipulated by CPCB. But none of the CETPs which were monitored
had the secured land fill. Hazardous waste disposal facilities were not found scientifically
sound. Chromium containing wastes had been dumped in unscientific manner that have to be
taken to secured landfill. Common TSDF is required for this purpose.

5.9 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in U. P.

Kanpur CETP
The USAB based Kanpur CETP at Jajmau has an inflow capacity of 36 MLD mainly treats
tannery effluent. 334 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent is used for
irrigation and disposed in Ganga River. The sludge is disposed on land. Sludge lifting by
Kanpur Nagar Nigam is highly irregular and mostly dumped near the by-pass channel leading
to River Ganga. The CETP is being run by UP Jal Nigam. Although the plant is operational
but is not being maintained properly. Untreated sewage gets bypassed to Ganga River.
Pumps at central sewage pumping station were not being properly operated and maintained.
Pumps in tannery conveyance system were not regularly operated during power cut for want
of diesel. 10 out of 13 pumps are non operational. Plant operates on less than 70% treatment
efficiency. Tannery effluent to sewage (T: S) blending ratio is disturbed from 1:3 to 1:1.5. The
capacity of the plant is only partially utilized as only 28 % of the designed flow reaches the
plant. The PETPs at individual units are not working properly resulting in high Cr and SS.
Also some units are not paying O & M costs. The plant is in state of poor economy due to non
/ irregular payment of O & M cost by State Govt. Due to heavy power shortage (load
shedding for 5 hrs) plant as well as pumping stations remain non-operational. This results in
discharge of untreated tannery wastewater into River Ganga

Unnao CETP
The Activate Sludge Process based Unnao CETP at Site-II, UPSIDC Indl Area has an inflow
2.15 MLD. It mainly treats tannery waste. Only 21 units are the members of the CETP. The
treated effluent is discharged into municipal drain (Loni) and the sludge was being kept within
the CETP premises. The Unnao Tanneries Pollution Control Co was running the CETP. Plant
achieves designed efficiency. PETPs in some units were not operated properly. Inspite of all
the required units having CRPs, the plant at times received high Chromium in raw
wastewater. Innovative efforts on pilot scale (Phyto-remediation of hazardous sludge) were
made for better performance. Disposal of sludge requires additional space and also
considerable improvement, as it was not in proper shape.
 Mathura CETP
The Activate Sludge Process based Mathura CETP at Mathura Indl Area has an inflow
capacity of 6.25 MLD. It mainly treats effluents form Textiles (Cotton) dying/printing units.
Only 30 units are the members of the CETP. The treated effluent is discharged into municipal
drain and the sludge was being kept within the CETP premises. The Mathura Industrial Area
Pollution. Control Co. Ltd was running the CETP. The capital cost in 1997 was 188 lakhs

Inlet flow is low, about 70% of the designed flow. Plant is operational but on less than 50%
efficiency. Plant operation is not proper. Equipment downtime is long. Conveyance system is
in bad shape. Significant content of floating oil was observed in raw wastewater. Onsite
testing facility is not in operational state since long even though space and equipment exist.
Hazardous solid waste is indiscriminately disposed of by the member units. Cost of treatment
has increased significantly from Rs 0.74/Kl. to approx Rs. 12/Kl.

5.10 Common Effluent Treatment Plants in West Bengal

Calcutta Leather Complex (CLC)

i. Calcutta Leather Complex (CLC) having an area of 1100 acres is located at Karaidanga,
Bantala is a full-fledged proposed leather manufacturing areas with all its related hide/skin
processing units, allied chemical manufacturing units coupled with other infrastructure
facilities. The leather complex is proposed to cater for about 540 - 550 tannery units, which
are presently scattered in the city and housed mainly in the dense urban locality of Tangra-
Topsia-Tiljala areas. Besides this, some new tanneries are also setting up their units in the
complex. The shifting of tanneries from their present location to the new complex is in
progress and it was reported that about 230 - 240 units have already either constructed or
being constructed their shed and are yet to start their operation and production.

ii. In the leather complex, it was roughly estimated that about 1000 MT of raw hides will be
processed thereby generating more or less 30 MLD of polluted liquid effluent. For the
treatment of 30 MLD wastewater from the whole complex, six modules of Common Effluent
Treatment Plant of capacity 5 MLD each was proposed. It was also decided that Four
Modules will be constructed and commissioned by the West Bengal State Government
through Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) and the rest Two will be
managed by the BOT Party i.e. Dalmia & Co.

iii. The modules 1 & 2 had been already commissioned by the State Government, reportedly
in March’ 2004, whereas the construction of other two modules 3 & 4 were in advanced stage
and were expected to be commissioned by January 2005. For want of influent, the modules 1
& 2 were not in operation. It was observed that for the module 5 & 6 (to be constructed by
Dalmia & Co), construction has been started.

iv. The effluent treatment system for all the six modules will be identical in design. Modules 1
& 2 were already constructed and consists of Equalization (in 2 compartments with diffused
aeration), Primary Clarifier, Diffused Aeration (in 3 compartments) and Secondary Clarifier in
each module.

v. The treated effluent is designed to be discharged to Storm Water Channel (SW Channel),
which meets River Vidyadhari at a distance of about 15 kms from the area. The river
ultimately meets the Bay of Bengal.

vi. For the management of Sludge, provision of Sludge Thickener (Filter Press) and also 12
Sludge Drying Beds (SDBs) as standby had been commissioned for the module 1 & 2 and
was seen under trial operation. There are six filter presses for each module and each filter
press was seen having 75 plates. The filter presses were designed to operate for 8
cycles/day having 2 hours cycle operation and sludge filtering capacity of 3.2 MT/day/module.

vii. For storing the Sludge (hazardous waste), a hazardous waste landfill facility will be
developed in 51 acres of land, for which Draft Project Report (DPR) was also submitted by
Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI). As this will take time, a temporary arrangement of
secured land filling is under construction in the CETP premises for storing the sludge for
about 5000 m3 – 6000 m3.

viii. For the transportation of effluent from the member tannery units, 8 numbers of Effluent
Pumping Stations (EPS) have been made. From the pumping stations effluent will be lifted to
the Common Holding Tank already constructed near the CETP of capacity 30 MLD. The 5
pipelines from the 5 EPS managed by KMDA leading to the common holding tank (total
designed flow 20 MLD). have been commissioned. The rest 3 pumping lines from the 3 EPS
of total flow 10 MLD is yet to be constructed by Dalmia & Co.

ix. For the Chrome tanned leather-manufacturing units, a common Chrome Recovery Unit
(CRU) is under process of installation. The total capacity will be 360 m3 in 3 modules for 109
interested member tanneries, which are chromium Sulfate consuming units. The other
chrome tanning units will install chrome recovery units on their own The 2 modules of 120 m3
capacity each CRU are being constructed near the Common Holding Tank.
x. As the tannery units have not yet started their operation and moreover, as the connecting
pipelines to the main Trunk from the individual member units have not yet been joined, the
CETP is not getting any effluent till date and becoming non-functional.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 In general, the performance of CETPs has been found to be very unsatisfactory, largely
because of poor operation and maintenance. Therefore, the State Pollution Control Boards
should conduct regular monitoring of CETPs and persuade them to ensure proper operation
and maintenance failing which they should initiate action against negligent agencies and
wilful defaulters.

6.2 Achieving standards for treated effluent quality from CETPs is dependent on meeting the
designed criteria of inlet quality to the CETPs that inter alia depends on effluent quality from
each industry. The State Pollution Control Boards are required to prescribe standards for
discharge effluent to CETP from each industry and enforce the same.

6.3 Optimization of neutralizing/coagulating chemicals is very important for deriving maximum

benefits from primary treatment units based on physico-chemical treatment, minimizing
sludge production and reducing pollutants’ load on subsequent biological treatment units. Jar
tests should be conducted on daily basis to decide type of coagulant and their dozing.

6.4 CETP operating agencies should engage experts to advice them from time to time for proper
operation and maintenance of CETP besides employing skilled manpower.

6.5 High TDS in the raw influent reaching CETPs and, as a result, in treated effluent of CETPs is
a major cause of concern, more so because it is generally caused by high salinity which
requires costly treatments such as Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Nano Filtration Systems
followed by Multi Stage evaporator systems (MSES). Area specific thoughtful approach is
required to tackle this problem. First attempt should be reduction in release of TDS
contributing chemicals from problem industries by adopting cleaner production technologies
and recovery and recycling of chemicals from the waste streams. Second option should be
treatment of waste stream for TDS at the level of individual industry. Treatment of TDS at the
CETP should be the last option unless some special conditions demand so. State Pollution
Control Boards should investigate all the TDS related problem areas and compel the
industries/CETPs for its solution.

6.6 The State Pollution Control Boards may consider prescribing location specific regulations for
the control of TDS at the industry level. Setting time limits in future for compliance of new
regulations, compliance of which requires significant investment, is an industry-friendly and
 effective approach. The same approach is suggested for prescribing location specific
regulations for the control of TDS at the industry level.

6.7 Capability and limitations of filter unit in a wastewater treatment scheme, as explained in
section 3.11, must be kept in mind while using these units wherever they exist in CETPs

6.8 Capability and limitations of activated carbon bed, as explained in section 3.12, must be
considered while including it as a terminal treatment unit in wastewater treatment. In
treatment schemes that already include activated carbon bed as terminal treatment unit, the
dependence on this unit should be based accordingly.

6.9 Operation of treatment units based on biological treatment (Activated Sludge Process) is
sensitive and requires understanding of important controlling parameters. Use of Solid
Retention Time (SRT), the ratio of solids in the system and solids wasted per day, as
controlling parameter is recommended because it is most simple and treatment efficiency,
sludge production, oxygen requirements and nutrients requirements are dependent on SRT.

6.10 Collection of wastewater from individual industries through tankers is not a foolproof system
and should be discouraged in new areas and reviewed and rectified in old ones by the
SPCBs unless it is technically impossible.
 ANNEXURE

Table 1 CETPs’ capacity, year of establishment, capital cost and related information
S. No. CETP Capacity Year of Capital cost, Name/address of CETP/company
MLD Establish- lac*
ment
AP
1 Jeedimetla 5 April 1989 98(G) + Jeetimetla Effluent Treatment Plant Limited
CETP 158(M)+ (JETL) , Hyderabad
125(L)
2 Pattancheru 7.5 1989 89(G) + Pattancheru Effluent Treatment Plant Limited
CETP 259(M)+ (PETL), Medak District, AP
380(L)
3 Bollaram CETP 0.25 1994 87(G) + Progressive Effluent Treatment Ltd., S.F. 284/2,
52(M)+ 82(L) Bollaram(V), Jinnaram Mandal, Distt. Medak
Delhi
1 Wazirpur CETP 24 2003 1834.26 Wazirpur industrial area CETP society, Wazirpur
industrial area, Delhi
2 Mangolpuri 2.4 2001 603.91 Mangolpuri industrial area CETP society,
CETP Mangolpuri industrial area, Delhi
3 Mayapuri CETP 12 2003 1117.99 Mayapuri industrial area CETP society, Mayapuri
industrial area, Delhi
4 Lawrence Road 12 2004 937.64 Keshavpuram Industrial Area CETP Society
CETP (Regt.), C-42/A, Keshavpuram Industrial Area,
(Lawrence Road ) Delhi- 1100335
5 Jhilmil CETP 16.8 2004 1177.46 Jhilmil industrial area CETP society, Jhilmil
industrial area, Delhi
6 Badli CETP 12 2003 806.45 Badli industrial area CETP society, Badli industrial
area, Delhi
7 Okhla Ind’l Area 24 2003 2101.44 Okhla industrial area CETP society, Okhla
CETP industrial area Phase I, Delhi
8 GTK Road 6 2002 728.82 GT Karnal road industrial area CETP society, GT
CETP Karnal road industrial area, Delhi
9 SMA CETP 12 2003 1214.37 SMA industrial area CETP society, SMA industrial
area, Delhi
10 Nangloi CETP 12 2003 1275.31 Nagloi industrial area CETP society, Nagloi
industrial area, Delhi
11 Narela CETP DSIDC
Gujrat
1 Naroda CETP, 3 July 1999 598.2 Naroda Enviro Project Ltd., CETP Division, Plot
Ahmedabad 512-515, Phase-1, Opp. Naroda Post Office,
GIDC Estate Naroda, Ahmedabad
2 Vatva CETP, 16 April 1998 4401 The Green Environment Services Co-operative
Ahmedabad Society Ltd., Plot 224-251, Phase-II GIDC Estate,
Vatva, Ahmedabad- 383445

3 Odhav CETP, 1.20 January 360 Odhav Enviro Projects Limited, Plot 25, GIDC
Ahmedabad 1998 Estate Odhav, Ahmedabad- 382415

4 Vapi CETP, 55 January 2040 Vapi Waste & Effluent Management Co. Ltd,
Vapi, Valsad 1997 CETP, Ext ¼ Opp. UPL, GIDC Estate Vapi-
396195 Distt. Valsad
5 Nandesari 5.50 November 300 Nandesari Industries Association, Plot 134/1 opp.
CETP, Vadodara 1994 Shopping Centre, Near GIDC office, GIDC Estate
Nandesari- 391340, Distt. Vadodara
6 Ankleshwar 1 February 680.3 Enviro Technology Ltd., Plot 2313-14, Ankleshwar
CETP 1997 GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar- 393002, Distt. Bharuch
7 Sachin CETP-I, 0.50 500 Globe Enviro Care Ltd. Plot No. PP/1, Off Road
Sachin, Surat No. 2, B/h Kay Tex Mill, GIDC Sachin, Surat-
394230
8 Sarigam CETP, 0.40 1994 Perfect Enviro Control Systems Ltd., Plot 731/A,
Sargam, Valsad GIDC Sarigram, Taluka Umargaon, Distt. Valsad-
396155
9 Dhareswar 0.15/0.05 1995 10 Shri dhareshwar GIDC Vistar Association, GIDC
CETP, Jetpur 5 Estate Jetpur- 360370, Distt. Rajkot
S. No. CETP Capacity Year of Capital cost, Name/address of CETP/company
MLD Establish- lac*
ment
10 Sanand CETP, 0.2 1997 260.24 Sanand Eco Projects Ltd, 3 Samast Brahma
Paldi, Kshatriya Society, Narayannagar Road
Ahmedabad Shantivan, Paldi, Ahmedabad- 380007
11 Jetpur CETP, 20 1989 125 Shri Jetpur Dyeing and Printing Association, R. S.
Jetpur No. 782&783 Painky, Narsang Tekri, Jetpur, Distt.
Rajkot
12 Panoli CETP, I.00 Panoli Enviro Technology Ltd., Plot 620/2-C GIDC
Bharuch Estate Panoli, Taluka Ankleshwar, Dist. Bharuch-
393002
13 Padra CETP, 2.25 Enviro Infrastructure Co. Ltd.,
Umaraya, Tal. Padra,
14 Sachin CETP-II, 50.00 Under Sachin Infra Environment Ltd, Plot PP/2, Off Road
Sachin, Surat commission No.2 B/h Kay Tex Mill, GIDC, Sachin, Surat,
ing Gujrat
15 GVMSAV Odhav 1.0 1998 Gujarat Vepari Mahamandal
CETP,
Ahmedabad
16 Narol CETP, 0.1 2001 Narol Dyestuff Enviro Society
Ahmedabad
Haryana
1 Kundli CETP 1.10 1999 76.9 HSIDC Industrial Estate Kundli, Kondli Dist.
Sonipat, Haryana
Karnataka
1 Pai & Pai CETP 0.3 1994 104.68(G) + Pai & Pai Chemicals Private Ltd., Kumabalgod,
61.86(M)+ Mysore Road, Bangalore
139.7(L)
2 Lidkar Banglore 1 July 1994 80(G) + Lidkar Tanners Enviro Control System Ltd., Lidkar
CETP 16(M)+ 60(L) CFC, Kudugondanahalli, Banglore- 560045
Maharashtra
1 Dombiveli CETP 14 2003 667 Dombivli Common Effluent Treatment Plant
Phase-I Phase-I, OS-8, Opp Tele exch., MIDC Dombivli
(East)
2 Dombiveli CETP 1.5 March 1999 267 Dombivli Common Effluent TreatmentPlant,Plot
Phase-II no. R-4/2, Opposite W-40, MIDC, Phase-II,
Dombivli (East), Mumbai- 421204
3 Thane Belapur 12 November 400 CETP (Thane-Belapur) Association, P-20, MIDC,
CETP 1997 Anand Bhadkamkar Common Facility Center
MIDC Khairane, Thane- Belapur Road, Navi
Mumbai- 400709
4 Tarapur CETP 2 June 1994 309 TIMA CETP Cooperative Society Ltd., Plot
O/23(1), MIDC Tarapur, At post: Boisar, Distt.
Thane- 401506
5 Taloja CETP 10 November 616 Taloja CETP Co-operative Society Ltd. Plot P-24,
1999 New Chemical Zone, MIDC Tajola, Navi Mumbai-
410208
6 Ambernath 0.25 March 1997 35 ACMA CETP Co-operative Society Ltd. W-30,
CETP Chemical Zone, MIDC Ambarnath (W) Distt.
Thane- 421501
7 Jaisingpur CETP 1 December 47.94 L. K. Akiwale Co-operative Industrial Estate
1997 Jaisingpur, Akiwale Udhyamnagar, Tluka: Shirol,
Distt.: Kolhapur- 416144
8 Patalganga 15 February 700 Patalganga and Rasayani Industries Association
CETP 2001 (PRIA) CETP, MIDC-Patalganga, taluka-Khopoli,
distt. Raigad
9 Mahad CETP 7.5 2002-03 MMA CETP Association
10 Badlapur CETP 8 ? 355 Badalpur Common Effluent Treatment Plant
Association, Plot OS-4&5 MIDC Badalpur-421503
Distt Thane, Maharashtra
11 Butibari CETP ? ? ? ?
MP
1 Govindpura 0.9 2000 127 Govindpura Audhyogic Kshetra Pradushan
CETP, Bhopal Nivaran Pvt Ltd, Govindpura Bhopal
S. No. CETP Capacity Year of Capital cost, Name/address of CETP/company
MLD Establish- lac*
ment
Punjab

1 Phillore CETP 0.035 1996 28 Dr Ambedkar Leather Association Ramdaspura,

Noormahal Rd. Phillore
Dist Jalandhar, (Pun)
2 Jalandhar CETP 1.50 1997 96 PSIEC Leather Complex, Kapoorthala Rd.
Was closed Jalandhar, Punjap
for last 2 yr
Rajasthan
1 Balotra CETP 6.00 2000 295 Balotra Water Pollution Control & Research
Unit I Foundation Trust, Balotra Industrial Area Phase I,
Balotra, Distt. Barmer, Rajasthan
2 Jasol CETP 2.50 Trial- 04/ 289 Jasol Water Polluting Control & Treatment
Comm. 05
3 Jodhpur CETP 20.00 July 2004, 1000 Jodhpur Pradushan Niwaran Trust, Sangaria
Under Industrial Area, Jodhpur
stabilization
4 Bhiwadi CETP 6.00 (2.5 Trial- 2004 85 RIICO, CETP, RIICO Industrial Area, Bhiwadi,
Ind. + 3.5 Rajasthan
sewage)
5 Pali CETP 5.20 1983 38 Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research
Unit I Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan
6 Pali CETP 8.40 1997 Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research
Unit II 775 Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan
7 Pali CETP 9.00 1999 (of II & III) Pali Water Pollution Control Treatment Research
Unit III Foundation, CETP, Mandia Road, Pali, Rajasthan
8 Machheri CETP, 0.60 2002 60 Jaipur Leather Complex Environmental Protection
Jaipur Foundation Pvt. Ltd., RIICO Leather Complex,
Manpura Macheri, Jaipur, Rajasthan
Tamilnadu
1 Mannarai CETP, 4.2 1999 135.5(G)+ M/s. Mannarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur
Tirupur 108(M)
2 Kashipalayam 4 1999 110(G) + M/s. Kasipalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur
CETP, Tirupur 240(M)
3 Veerapondi 10 1999 336(G) + M/s.Veerapondi CETP Ltd., Tirupur
CETP, Tirupur 384(M)
4 Manickapuram 1.6 1999 63.5(G) + M/s.Manickapuram Pudur CETP Ltd., Tirupur
Pudur CETP, 63.5(M)
Tirupur
5 Kunnangalpalay 4.25 1999 108(G) + M/s. Kunnangalpalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur
am CETP, 108(M)
Tirupur
6 Andipalayam 5 1999 107.5(G) + M/s. Andipalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur
CETP, Tirupur 171.25(M)
7 Angeripalayam 8.5 1999 M/s. Angeripalayam CETP Ltd., Tirupur
CETP, Tirupur
8 Chinnakkarai 5 1999 122.5(G) + M/s. Chinnakkarai CETP Ltd., Tirupur
CETP Ltd., 183(M
Tirupur
9 Andakovil CETP, Karur Andakovil Effluent Treatment, Karur
Karur
10 KS CETP, Karur KS Common Effluent Treatment, Karur
11 KKEL CETP, 1.3 1999 100(G) + Karur Karuppampalayam Envirotech Ltd. (KKEL),
Karur 56.4(M)+ Karur
43.6(L)
12 Sellandi ? ? ? Karur Sellandi Palayam Pollution Control Ltd,
Palayam CETP, Karur
Karur
13 Thiruvai CETP, 2.1 1999 104(G) + Karur Thiruvai Pollution Control Ltd, Karur
Karur 41(M)+ 63(L)
14 Valandi Dyeing ? ? ? Karur Valandi Dyeing Envirotech Ltd, Karur
CETP, Karur
15 Taluk Dye & ? ? ? Karur Taluk Dye & Bleaching Effluent Treatment
Bleaching CETP, Plant Ltd, Karur
Karur
 S. No. CETP Capacity Year of Capital cost, Name/address of CETP/company
MLD Establish- lac*
ment
16 Amaravathi Poll 2.4 1999 122(G) + Amaravathi Poll Tech Ltd., Karur
Tech CETP, 32(M)+ 90(L)
karur
17 TALCO 2.8 May 1991 189.25(G) + TALCO Vaniyambadi Enviro control systems Ltd,
Vaniyambadi, 33.25(M)+ 183 Cutchery Road Extension, Valayampet,
Valayampet, 112.5(L) Vaniyambadi- 635754
CETP, Vellore
18 TALCO 0.2 January 30(G) + 40(M) TALCO Vaniyambadi Enviro control systems Ltd,
Vaniyambadi, 1996 183 Cutchery Road Extension, Udayendiram,
Udayendiram Vaniyambadi- 635754
CETP, Vellore
19 TALCO 0.9 August 80(G) + TALCO Perinambut Tanners Effluent Treatment
Perinambut 1995 80(M)+ 40(L) Co.,Ltd., Bakkalapalli Sector, No 299/A High
CETP Road, Pernambut- 635810

20 TALCO Ambur 2 November 178.5(G) + TALCO Ambur Tannery Effluent Treatment

Thuthipet 1994 356.5(M) Co.Ltd. Post Box No. 21, Periyavarikkam,
CETP, Vellore Thuthipet, Ambur- 635811 Distt. Vellore
21 Visharam CETP, 3.4 October 98.25(G) + Visharam Tanners Enviro Control Systems Pvt
Melvisharam 1996 92.29(M)+ Ltd, No. 306, 307, C, Abdul Hakeem Road,
Vellore 175(L) Melvisharam- 632509 Distt. Vellore
22 TALCO Ranipet 4 February TALCO Ranipet Tannery Effluent Treatment Co.
CETP, Vellore 1996 Ltd., VC Mottor Village, Vennivedu Post,
Walajah, Distt. Vellore- 632513
23 Melpudupet Melvisharam Tanners Effluent Treatment Co,Pvt
CETP, Ambur, Ltd.,Melpudupet Sector, Walajha taluk
Vellore
24 Ambur 1.1 August 100(G) + Ambur Tannery Effluent Treatment Co.Ltd. Kaspa
Mallgalthope 1998 70(M)+ 100(L) Road, Ambur- 635802
CETP, Vellore
25 SIDCO Ranipet 2.5 December 100(G) + Ranipet SIDCO Finished Leather Effluent
CETP, Vellore 1995 81.04(M)+ Treatment Co.Pvt Ltd, Plot 199, SIDCO Industrial
138.96(L Estate, SIPCOT, Ranipet- 632403
26 SIDCO phase II SIPCOT & SIDCO phase II Entrepreneur Co Pvt
CETP Ranipet, Ltd, Ranipet
Vellore
27 TALCO Dindigul 2.5 December 245(G) + TALCO Dindigul Tanners Enviro Control Systems
CETP 1996 142(M)+ Pvt Ltd, Batlagundu Bye Pass Road, Begambur
120(L) Post, Dindigul- 624002
28 TALCO 0.4 January 280 Madhavaram Leather Manufacturers Facility Pvt
Madhavaram 1997 Ltd., H 3, TALCO Industrial Estate, Madhavaram,
CETP, Chennai Chennai- 60
29 Pallavaram 3 February 100(G) + Pallavaram tanners Industrial Effluent Co. Ltd.,
CETP, Chennai 1995 174.8(M)+ 105, Anna Salai, Nagalkeni, Chromepet, Chennai-
462(L) 44
UP
1 Kanpur CETP 36.00 1994 2209 UP Jal Nigam. Jajmau, Kanpur, UP
2 Unnao CETP 2.15 1996 195 Unnao Tanneries Pollution Control Co Site-II,
UPSIDC Indl Area, Unnao, UP
3 Mathura CETP 6.25 1997 188 Mathura Industrial Area Pollution. Control Co Site-
A, D-70, Industrial Area, Mathura, UP
West Bengal
1 Calcutta Leather 6 mod. 2 modular
Complex CETP units of 5 units -Mar
MLD 04
each
*(G):Govt. contribution, (M):Members contribution, (L):Loan
 Table 2 CETPs treatment technologies and wastewater collection & disposal system
S. CETP Capacity Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent Effluent
No. MLD collection disposal
AP
1 Jeedimetla 5 Eq. tanks (3) +flash mixer +Clariflocculator 34 Dye & dye Tankers Amberpet
CETP +Dissolved air flotation unit +Sewage mixing intermediate, STP
+Aeration tanks (6) +Secondary clarifiers chemical
and Sludge drying beds
2 Pattancheru 7.5 Eq. tanks +Dissolved air flotation unit 104 Tankers Amberpet
CETP Sewage mixing +Aeration tanks (Pure Pharmaceuticals, STP
oxygen) (2) +Secondary clarifiers (2) and Chemical, Steel,
Sludge drying beds Pesticides, leather
3 Bollaram 0.25 Eq. tanks +Pre-settling tank +Aeration tank-I 24 Tankers On land for
CETP +Secondary clarifier-I +Aeration tank- Pharmaceuticals, plantation
II+Secondary clarifier-II +maturation Pond chemical
and Sludge lagoons
Delhi
1 Wazirpur 24 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer Pickling and Industrial Yamuna
CETP +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF general sewers River
2 Mangolpuri 2.4 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +PST +Aeratin General Industrial Yamuna
CETP tank +SST +DMF +ACF sewers River
3 Mayapuri 12 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer General Industrial Yamuna
CETP +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF sewers River
4 Lawrence 12 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +F. Mixer Food processing Industrial Yamuna
Road CETP +Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF and general sewers River
5 Jhilmil CETP 16.8 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer Engineering and Industrial Yamuna
+Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF general sewers River
6 Badli CETP 12 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer Pickling Industrial Yamuna
+Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF sewers River
7 Okhla Ind’l 24 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Fl. Mixer General and textile Industrial Yamuna
Area CETP +Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF sewers River
8 GTK Road 6 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer General Industrial Yamuna
CETP +Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF sewers River
9 SMA CETP 12 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Flash mixer General Industrial Yamuna
+Tube settlers +DM filter +ACF sewers River
10 Nangloi CETP 12 Screen +Grit Ch. +Eq. tank +Fl. Mixer Rubber products Industrial Yamuna
+Flocculator +Tube settlers +DMF +ACF and general sewers River
11 Narela CETP General Industrial Yamuna
sewers River
Gujrat
1 Naroda CETP, 3 O&G trap +Eq.tank +F.mixer + 255 Textile & Pipeline Sabarmati
Ahmedabad Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary Chemicals Dyes, River
clarifier and Sludge drying beds Pharmaceuticals,
2 Vatva CETP, 16 Eq.tank +F.mixer + Clariflocculator +Aeration 464 Dyes, Textile Pipeline Sabarmati
Ahmedabad tank +Aeration tank- integral secondary Pharma. Chemicals River
clarifier and Sludge drying beds Rolling mills
3 Odhav CETP, 1.20 Eq. tank +F.mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeratin 61 Dye&dye Pipeline Sabarmati
Ahmedabad tank-I +S.Clarifier-I +Aeratin tank-II intermediate, River
+S.Clarifier-II and Filter press for sludge Textiles
4 Vapi CETP, 55 Screen +Grit chamber +Eq. tank + 777 Paper mills, Pipeline Damangang
Vapi, Valsad Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank + Secondary Chemicals, Dyes, a River
clarifier and Sludge drying beds Pharma, Engg.
5 Nandesari 5.50 Screen +Grit chamber +Eq. tank +F.mixer 256 Chemical, Tankers Estuarine
CETP, +Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary Organic chemicals, zone of River
Vadodara clarifier +Sand and activated carbon filter Dyes & dye Mahi
and Sludge drying beds intermediate
6 Ankleshwar 1 Eq. tank +Neutralization tank 263 Chemical, , Tankers Narmada
CETP +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank + Secondary Dyes &dye River
clarifier +Chemical dozing tank +Tube settler intermediate,
+Sand and activated carbon filter and Pesticides,
Vacuum drum filter for sludge Pharma.
7 Sachin CETP- 0.50 Eq. tank +Chemical treatment tank 38 Dyes & dye Tankers Creek
I, Sachin, +Clariflocculator +Aeratin tank-I + Lamella intermediate
Surat Clarifier-I + Aeratin tank-II + Lamella
Clarifier-II
S. CETP Capacity Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent Effluent
No. MLD collection disposal
8 Sarigam 0.40 Eq. tank +Flash mixer+Clariflocculator 17 Chemical, Pipeline Sea
CETP, +Aeratin tank-I + Secondary Clarifier-I + Pharma, Dyes&dye and
Sargam, Aeratin tank-II + Secondary Clarifier-II intermediate Tankers
Valsad
9 Dhareswar 0.15/.055 O&G trap +Flash mixer +Clarifier +Bio tank 23 Textile printing Pipeline River Bhadar
CETP, Jetpur +Sand filter +AC filter units
10 Sanand CETP, 0.2 Eq. tank +Filter press +Multiple effect 32 Chemical, Tankers
Paldi, evaporation system +Incineration chamber Pharma, Dyes,
Ahmedabad (for liquid and solid waste) Pesticides, Petroleum
11 Jetpur CETP, 20 Eq. tank +O&G trap +Chemical mixing +Cl. 972 Textile printing Pipeline
Jetpur Flocculator +Aerated lagoon units
12 Panoli CETP, I.00 Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Clariflocculator 101 Chemical, Tankers
Bharuch +Aeratin tank +S. clarifier +DM filter Pharma, Dyes
13 Padra CETP, 2.25 ? ? ?
14 Sachin CETP- 50.00 Eq. tank +Flash mixer +Primary Lamella 71 Textile dyeing Industrial
II, Sachin, +Aeratin tank +SST +pH adjustment +Tube and printing units sewers
Surat settler +Sand filter +ACF
15 GVMSAV 1.0 Eq.tank +F.mixer +Clariflocculator +Aeration 264 Dye & Dye
Odhav CETP, tank +S.clarifier +Pressure sand filter intermediate
Ahmedabad +Activated carbon filter
16 Narol CETP, 0.1
Ahmedabad
Haryana
1 Kundli CETP 1.10 Biological treatment 198 Milk/ food Yamuna d/s
processing, textile, Thr. drain IV
rubber, leather
Karnataka
1 Pai & Pai 0.3 Inlet sumps (3) +Reaction tanks (3) for 26 metal finishing Tankers On land for
CETP acidic, alkaline and cyanide waste +Blending inits gardening
chamber +Flocculation tank +Clarifier +Sand
filter +pH adjustment and RO Plant
+Evaporator for high TDS waste and Filter
press primary sludge and evaporator residue
22 Lidkar 1 G. chamber +Eq. tank +Primary clarifier 5 Tannery Pipeline Public
Banglore +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier (2) sewers
CETP and Sludge drying beds
Maharashtra
1 Dombiveli 14 Eq.tank +F.mixer +Flocculation tank 118 Textile Opendrain /
CETP Phase-I +Clarifier + Bioreactor + S.clarifier industries Ulhas River
2 Dombiveli 1.5 O&G trap +Eq.tank +Clariflocculator 157 Pharmaceut. Tankers Opendrain /
CETP Phase-II +Biotower +Secondary clarifier and Sludge Organic/ inorganic Ulhas River
drying beds chemicals, Dyes,
Metal coating
3 Thane Belapur 12 Eq. cum neutralization tank + F.mixer + 480 Pharmaceut. Pipeline Thane Creek
CETP Clariflocculator + Aeration tank (Extended Dye, Pigments
Aeration) +Secondary clarifier and Sludge Paints, Textile, ,
drying beds Chemicals, (1905
non members)
4 Tarapur CETP 2 Eq.tank cum oil separator +Clariflocculator 223 Tankers Thane Creek
+Aer tank-I +Clarifier-I +Aer.tank-II Pharmaceutical,
+Clarifier-II +Aer.tank-III +Clarifier-III and Chemical, Dyes,
Filter press for sludge Engineering
5 Taloja CETP 10 O&G trap + Eq. cum neutralization tank + 943 Pharma & Pipeline Thane Creek
Clariflocculator + Aer.tank + Secondary other industries
clarifier and Sludge drying beds
6 Ambernath 0.25 Screen +Grit chamber + Eq. cum 34 Dyes and Tankers MIDC drain
CETP neutralization tank + Clariflocculator Chemical
+Aer.tank + Secondary clarifier
7 Jaisingpur 1 Eq. cum neutralization tank +PST +Aer.tank 19 Textile, Dairy Industrial River
CETP + Secondary clarifier and sludge pits Chemicals, , Auto drainage
parts, Batteries
8 Patalganga 15 Physico chemical +Biological +Tertiary 35 Chemical, Industrial Tidal zone of
CETP (proposed) Pharma, Dyes & drainage Patalganga
Dye intermediate River
Petrochemical
S. CETP Capacity Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent Effluent
No. MLD collection disposal
9 Mahad CETP 7.5 G. chamber +Neutralization +F.mixer 154
+Clariflocculation +Biotower +Aeration tank-
I&II +S.clarifier +Pressure sand filters
10 Badlapur 8 Equalization tank +Clarifloculator +Aer.tank I 52 Textiles, HDPE
CETP + Secondary clarifier I + Aer.tank II + 146 Engineering, pipeline
Secondary clarifier II and Thickener and 146 Chemicals &
Filter press for sludge Dyes (344)
11 Butibari CETP
MP
1 Govindpura 0.9 Eq. tank +Holding tank +Buffer tank 34 Industries Tankers+ On land and
CETP, Bhopal +Anaerobic reactor (UASB) + Aeration tank Pipeline Patra nala
Punjab
1 Phillore CETP 0.035 Anaerobic filter + ASP 28 Tanneries STP-Phillore
(27 vegetable, 1
chrome)
2 Jalandhar 1.50 ASP 67 tanning and Kala Singha
CETP allied industries drain/ Sutluj
(39 chrome)
Rajasthan
1 Balotra CETP 6.00 Screen +G. Chamber +O&G trap +Eq.tank 600 Textile dyeing Open Luni River
Unit I +F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank and printing (CETP drain
and Sludge drying beds was designed for
319 units only)
2 Jasol CETP 2.50 Screen +G. Chamber +O&G trap +Eq.tank 60 Textile dyeing Open Luni River
+F.mixer + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank and printing drain
+Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds
3 Jodhpur CETP 20.00 Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tanks (2) +F.mixer 100 Stainless steel Drain for Jojri River
+ Clariflocculator + Aeration tank pickling and 150 textile/
+Secondary clarifier +Sand filter + ACF Textile dyeing and Pipeline
printing for steel
units
4 Bhiwadi CETP 6.00 (2.5 O&G trap + Aeration tanks +Secondary 55 industries + Open Sabi River
Ind. + 3.5 clarifier and Sludge thickener and Filter sewage drain
sewage) press for sludge
5 Pali CETP 5.20 Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator 473 Textile units+ Open River Bandi
Unit I + Aeration tanks (2) +Secondary clarifier and sewage for Unit I&II drains
Sludge drying beds Ind+sew
6 Pali CETP 8.40 Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tank +Chemical Open River Bandi
Unit II mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank drains
+Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Ind+sew
7 Pali CETP 9.00 Screen +G. Chamber +Eq.tank +Chemical 292 Textile units+ Open River Bandi
Unit III mixing + Clariflocculator + Aeration tank sewage drains
+Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds Ind+sew
8 Machheri 0.60 Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + P. Clarifier + 9 Tannery Pipeline On land
CETP, Jaipur Bioreactor +Secondary clarifier +Chemical
mixing +Tertiary settling and Filter press for
sludge
Tamilnadu
1 Mannarai 4.2 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 30 Textile HDPE On land for
CETP, Tirupur Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline plantation
Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
2 Kasipalayam 4 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 20 Textile HDPE Noyyal River
CETP, Tirupur Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline (Orathupalay
Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing am dam)
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
3 Veerapondi 10 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 75 Textile HDPE Noyyal River
CETP, Tirupur Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline (Orathupalay
Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing am dam)
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
4 Manickapuram 1.6 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 10 Textile HDPE Inland
Pudur CETP, Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline surface
Tirupur Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing water
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
S. CETP Capacity Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent Effluent
No. MLD collection disposal
5 Kunnangalpala 4.25 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 18 Textile HDPE Odai Canal
yam CETP, Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline
Tirupur Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
6 Andipalayam 5 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 21 Textile HDPE Noyyal River
CETP, Tirupur Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline (Orathupalay
Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing am dam)
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
7 Angeripalayam 8.5 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 72 Textile HDPE Nallar River
CETP, Tirupur Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline
Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
8 Chinnakkarai 5 Screen +Eq.tanks (2) +Chemical mixing + 31 Textile HDPE Odai Canal
CETP Ltd., Clariflocculator + Sand filter +Stabilization bleaching and pipeline
Tirupur Tank and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Sludge drying beds for sludge
9 Andakovil Physico-chemical treatment Amaravati
CETP, Karur River
10 KS CETP, --Do--
Karur
11 KKEL CETP, 1.3 Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator 47 Textile Canal
Karur + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary bleaching and
clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge
12 Sellandi Physico-chemical treatment
Palayam
CETP, Karur
13 Thiruvai 2.1 Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator 55 Textile Canal
CETP, Karur + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary bleaching and
clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge
14 Valandi ? Physico-chemical treatment
Dyeing CETP,
Karur
15 Taluk Dye & ? --Do--
Bleaching
CETP, Karur
16 Amaravathi 2.4 Eq.tank +Chemical mixing + Clariflocculator 44 Textile Canal
Poll Tech + Aeration tank (Not used now) +Secondary bleaching and
CETP, karur clarifier and Sludge thickener +Decanter dyeing
centrifuge +Belt filter for sludge
17 TALCO 2.8 Eq. tank + Screen +F. mixer +Primary 110 Tannery HDPE Palar River
Vaniyambadi, clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Aerated lagoon pipeline
Valayampet, +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds
CETP, Vellore
18 TALCO 0.2 Settling basin + Screen +G. chamber +Eq. 10 Tannery HDPE Palar River
Vaniyambadi, tank +F. mixer +Clariflocculator +Anaerobic pipeline
Udayendiram lagoon (2) + Aerated lagoon +Secondary
CETP, Vellore clarifier and Sludge drying beds
19 TALCO 0.9 Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary 10 Tannery HDPE On land
Pernambut clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Pre-aeration pipeline (HRTS
CETP tank +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier system) and
+Chemical dozing +Tertiaty clarifier and Nullah
Sludge thickener +Centrifuge / Sludge drying
beds
20 TALCO Ambur 2 Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary clarifier 34 Tannery HDPE On land
Thuthipet +Oxidation ditches (4) +Secondary clarifier pipeline (HRTS
CETP, Vellore and Sludge drying beds system) and
Palar River
21 Visharam 3.4 Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary 22 Tannery HDPE On land
CETP, clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary pipeline (Green belt)
Melvisharam clarifier +Polishing pond and Sludge and Palar
Vellore thickener +sludge drying beds River
S. CETP Capacity Technology/ Treatment Scheme Type of industries Effluent Effluent
No. MLD collection disposal
22 TALCO 4 Screen +Pre-settler +Eq. tank +F. mixer 77 Tannery HDPE Palar River
Ranipet CETP, +Primary clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Pre- pipeline through
Vellore aeration tank +Aeration tank +Secondary nallah
clarifier +Chemical dozing +Tertiaty clarifier
and Sludge thickener +Centrifuge / Sludge
drying beds
23 Melpudupet
CETP, Ambur,
Vellore
24 Ambur 1.1 Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary 7 Tannery HDPE On land
Mallgalthope clarifier +Anaerobic lagoon +Aeration tank pipeline (HRTS
CETP, Vellore +Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds system) and
Palar River
25 SIDCO 2.5 Screen +Eq. tank +F. mixer +Primary 86 Tannery HDPE On land
Ranipet CETP, clarifier +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary pipeline (Irrigation)
Vellore clarifier +Filter bed and Sludge drying beds and Ponnai
Lake
26 SIDCO phase
II CETP
Ranipet,
Vellore
27 TALCO 2.5 Eq. tank +Screen + Primary clarifier 45 Tannery HDPE On land
Dindigul CETP +Anaerobic lagoon + Aeration tank pipeline (HRTS
+Secondary clarifier and Sludge drying beds system)+
Sengankula
m tank of
CETP
28 TALCO 0.4 G. chamber +Eq. tank +Primary clarifier 14 Tannery Pipeline Mulakkadai
Madhavaram +Aeration tank (2) +Secondary clarifier (2) Nullah
CETP, and Sludge drying beds
Chennai
29 Pallavaram 3 Screen +G. chamber +Eq. tank 125 Tannery Pipeline Adyar River
CETP, +Clariflocculator +Aeration tank +Secondary
Chennai clarifier and Sludge thickener +Filter press
+Sludge drying beds
UP
1 Kanpur CETP 36.00 USAB + ASP 354 Tanneries Irrigation
+Sewage (1:1.5)
2 Unnao CETP 2.15 ASP (Two stage) 21 Tanneries Municipal
drain
3 Mathura CETP 6.25 ASP 30 Textile dyeing Municipal
and printing drain
West Bengal
1 Calcutta 6 Eq. tank with preaeration +Primary clarifier About 540-550 Vidyadhari
Leather modular +Aeration tank +Secondary clarifier and tanneries River
Complex units of 5 Chrome Recovery Unit processing 1000 through SW
CETP MLD MT hides to be channel
each shifted to Calcutta
Leather Complex
 Table 3 Performance of CETPs in terms of aggregate water quality parameters and salinity,
values in mg/l except pH
Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
AP
1 Jeedimetla Dec 30, 04 5 1.2 Influent (Ind.) 8.35 4000 9260 586 37302 1230 9401
CETP (Comp.) 0
1.2 Outlet Clarifier & 8.48 3000 7686 316 39312 1212 9040
DAF (Ind.) 0
1.6 Sewage 7.58 130 278 296 1535 234 376
1.2+ Inlet ASP (Mixed) 8.16 2600 7130 213 37772 1194 8678
1.6 sew 0
1.2+ Effluent (Mixed) 7.31 18 1019 121 14990 5040 5062
1.6 sew

---do--- Dec 02- 5 1.2 Influent (Ind.) 8.4 4480 13150 1470 41130 ND 8429
EPTRI
1.2 Outlet Clarifier & 8.4 4280 12500 1530 43970 ND 9017
DAF (Ind.)
1.6 Sewage 7.4 ND 470 70 1660 ND 519
1.2+ Inlet ASP (Mixed) 7.5 1220 4600 350 17400 ND 3332
1.6 sew
1.2+ Effluent (Mixed) 7.8 68 1420 90 15310 ND 3234
1.6 sew

2 Pattancheru Dec 31, 04 7.5 2 Influent (Ind.) 7.66 3100 6297 510 10888 2650 3797
CETP (Comp.)
2 Outlet DAF (Ind.) 7.82 3000 5834 176 9732 2750 3797
1 Sewage from 7.70 150 407 262 784 92 1085
BHEL township
2+ Inlet ASP (Mixed) 7.83 1550 4537 418 7704 1850 3254
1 sew
2+ Inlet ASP (Mixed) 7.76 100 1204 252 6372 1634 4158
1 sew

---do--- Dec 02- 7.5 2 Influent (Ind.) 7.6 1930 6520 970 11140 ND 4600
EPTRI
2 Outlet DAF (Ind.) 7.8 1720 5800 275 11100 ND 4700
1 Sewage from 7.3 98 275 50 610 ND 118
BHEL township
2+ Inlet ASP (Mixed) 7.6 1120 4400 510 7910 ND 3525
1 sew
2+ Effluent (Mixed) 7.8 46 1360 200 6990 ND 3040
1 sew
Delhi
1 Wazirpur Aug 28, 05 24 1*500 Influent 4.08 65 215 194 3826
3
CETP For 7 hr (2*12) m /hr 6
After equal. tank 3.37 34 121 850 4098
After tube settler 6.17 36 89 57 4262
After DMF 6.91 25 64 53 3816
Effluent after ACF 7.45 21 69 57 3816

2 Mangolpuri Jun 28, 05 2.4 50 Influent (after eq.) 7.36 59 320 640 7268 1358
3
CETP For 7 hr m /hr
After PST 7.41 54 437 222 7050
After SST 7.55 10 48 86 7034
After DMF 7.56 4 27 40
Effluent 7.43 3 24 41 1764

3 Mayapuri Jun 29, 05 12 500 Influent (after eq.) 6.91 128 402 584 2144 613
3
CETP For 7 hr m /hr
After tube settler 7.26 40 107 94 2254
After DMF 7.20 34 87 60 2200
Effluent 7.20 22 60 27 1246 566
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
4 Lawrence Jun 30,05 12 500 Influent (after eq.) 7.57 304 615 366 1852 538
3
Road CETP For 7 hr m /hr
After tube settler 7.43 100 276 80 1704
After dual media 7.63 145 233 152
filter
Effluent 7.89 114 185 108 1528 407

5 Jhilmil CETP Aug 25, 05 16.8 1*350 Influent 7.47 103 211 369 3666
3
For 7 hr (2*8.4) m /hr
After equal. tank 7.54 30 88 163 3692
After tube settler 7.54 04 18 64 4110
After DMF 7.53 08 16 48 3930
Effluent after ACF 7.56 06 26 43 3086

6 Badli CETP Aug 26, 05 12 500 Influent 5.22 52 197 862 1946
3
For 7 hr m /hr
After equal. tank 6.41 20 130 873 1726
After tube settler 6.75 05 57 30 1944
After DMF 6.80 05 13 30 1682
Effluent after ACF 7.23 07 39 28 1672

7 Okhla Ind’l Aug 27, 05 24 1*500 Influent 7.89 311 657 146 3202
3
Area CETP For 7 hr (2*12) m /hr 0
After equal. tank 8.29 138 620 172 2782
0
After tube settler 7.92 64 113 84 3092
After DMF 7.81 36 82 36 2270
Effluent after ACF 8.09 29 67 44 2148

8 GTK Road Jun 27, 05 6 250 Influent (after eq.) 7.05 296 1581 1482 270
3
CETP For 7 hr m /hr
After tube settler 6.54 20 49 71 1796
After dual media 6.56 11 39 24 1740
filter
Effluent 6.57 10 37 53 1550 238

9 SMA CETP Jul 1, 05 12 1*250 Influent (after eq.) 7.38 6 30 221 4134 556
3
For 7 hr (2*6) m /hr
After tube settler 7.40 3 19 126 4190
After dual media 7.49 6 39 33 4062
filter
Effluent 7.62 3 24 77 4228 736

10 Nangloi CETP Jul 6, 05 12 500 Influent (after eq.) 7.76 50 210 503 4240 1368
3
For 7 hr m /hr
After tube settler 7.71 42 283 65 3910
After dual media 7.86 5 26 32 3950
filter
Effluent 7.93 4 16 16 981
Gujrat
1 Naroda CETP, 2004-05 3 2 Influent 7.3 1540 5299 1694 ND ND ND
Ahmedabad
Effluent 7.8 375 2988 165 ND ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 3 3 Influent 7.6- 1230- 5370- 500- 28900 ND ND

B 7.8 1600 5980 600
After P. Clarifier 7.55 1140- 5390- ND 29000 ND ND
- 7.9 1350 5980
Effluent 8.0- 160 1650- 70- 14600 ND ND
8.7 1970 100

2 Vatva CETP, 2004-05 16 10 Influent 8.2 700 3604 855 ND ND ND

Ahmedabad
Effluent 6.1 71 860 214 ND ND ND
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
Vatva CETP, Feb 2004 16 Influent ND 833 2560 276 18422 ND ND
Ahmedabad
Effluent ND 50 1872 320 21224 ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 16 10 Influent 7.8- 600- 2140- 400- 10000- ND ND

B 7.95 630 3000 600 250000
After P. Clarifier 8.7- 530- 2580- ND 12600- ND ND
9.0 680 3540 25200
Effluent 7.9- 60- 120 940- 90- 19200- ND ND
8.1 1710 100 23900

3 Odhav CETP, 2004-05 1.2 0.7 Influent 7.0 142 1147 362 ND ND ND
Ahmedabad
Effluent 7.0 35 550 52 ND ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 1.2 0.6 Influent 7.3- 590- 1150- 400- 24300- ND ND
B 8.4 800 2240 650 24500
After P. Clarifier 7.1- 560- 1320- ND 23150- ND ND
8.3 800 2360 23300
Effluent 7.2- 140- 810- 85- 20200- ND ND
8.4 160 1120 100 20800

4 Vapi CETP Jan 3, 05 55 45 Influent 7.2 769 2654 974 ND ND ND

(Grab)
Effluent 7.2 221 976 81 ND ND ND

--do-- Dec 02 55 Influent ND 2500 5325 710 19825 ND ND

Effluent ND 360 1563 204 9168 ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 55 42 Influent 6.1- 480- 1450- 400- 8700- ND ND

B 7.9 1120 3900 650 10650
After P. Clarifier 7.3- 180- 1000- ND 9900- ND ND
8.1 480 3000 11250
Effluent 7.1- 120- 610- 80- 10500- ND ND
7.9 250 3300 120 14000

5 Nandesari Sep 20-21, 5.5 1.5 Influent 7.8 139 1124 145 15433 ND ND
CETP 04(24 hr)
Effluent 7.8 27 295 33 8743 ND ND

--do-- Jan 2004 5.5 Influent ND 1300 2835 306 22862 ND ND

Effluent ND 93 649 45 34566 ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 5.5 1.25 Influent 7.0- 1200- 2000- 250- 21600 ND ND
B 8.5 1900 2500 500
After P. Clarifier 8.2 70 230 ND 8700 ND ND
After S. Clarifier 7.3 60 305 ND 10800 ND ND
Effluent 7.0- 30- 60 180- 60- 3500- ND ND
8.5 230 90 9500

6 Ankleshwar Nov 18-19, 1 1 Influent 1.2 1600 5277 930 38906 ND 1081
CETP 04 1
For 24 hr
Effluent 7.8 11 153 10 3032 ND 1418

--do-- April 2005 1 Influent 1.0 1020 4297 1076 ND ND ND

Effluent 7.9 53 157 17 ND ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 1 0.8/1.8 Influent 0.5 670 2800 400- 51100 ND ND
B 1850
After P. Clarifier 8.4 340 900 ND 23200 ND ND
After S. Clarifier 7.1 20 520 ND 18400 ND ND
Effluent 7.25 35 85 80- 4900 ND ND
90
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
7 Sachin Jan 11, 05 0.5 0.1 Influent 7.3 242 1020 129 8355 ND 5261
CETP,Surat (Grab)
(.5 MLD)
Effluent 7.4 ND 194 34 8147 ND 6055

--do-- Dec 02-IITB 0.5 0.15 Influent 7.1 140 1500 ND 17750 ND ND
After P. Clarifier 9.3 30 160 ND 16630 ND ND
Effluent 6.8 10 335 ND 21900 ND ND

8 Sarigam Jan 4, 05 0.4 .075 Influent 8.0 514 1632 162 5080 ND 1614
CETP (Grab)
Effluent 7.2 83 416 59 5269 ND 2202

--do-- Dec 02-IITB 0.4 .105 Influent 7.95 300 3650 375- 16500 ND ND
300
After P. Clarifier 8 60 3980 ND 12300 ND ND
Effluent 7.5 120 2650 30- 11500 ND ND
60

9 Dhareswar Jan 19, 05 0.15/0. 0.05 Influent 6.3 1100 2510 218 3079 ND 754
CETP, Jetpur (Grab) 055
Effluent 6.7 560 1146 35 2008 ND 472

--do-- Dec 02-IITB 0.15/0. 0.06 Influent 7.1 1000 1150 100 2000- ND ND
055 2100
After P. Clarifier 7.2 180 200 ND ND ND ND
Effluent 7.2 40 60 40- 1500- ND ND
60 2000

10 Sanand Dec 02-IITB 0.2 .003 Influent 5.88 15270 19800 ND 310700 ND ND
CETP, Paldi,
Ahmedabad
After P. Clarifier 5.73 14070 17820 ND 342500 ND ND
Effluent 9.58 1780 8167 40 49955 ND ND

11 Jetpur CETP Jan 19, 05 20 7 Influent 10.5 467 1105 218 1849 ND 471
(Grab)
Effluent 8.7 300 921 263 3440 ND 990

--do-- Dec 02-IITB 20 6 Influent 7.5- 275 350- 200 3250 ND ND

7.8 400
After P. Clarifier 7.6- 40 70- 160 50- 1900 ND ND
(Effluent) 8.2 90
Effluent

12 Panoli CETP, Sep 23-24, I 0.45 Influent 7.07 1215 3615 563 35555 ND 2045
Bharuch 04 ( 24 hr) 6
Effluent 7.49 51 779 160 15494 ND 7868

13 Padra CETP, 2004-05 2.25 Influent 7.2 474 1255 454 ND ND ND

Effluent 7.7 3 364 84 ND ND ND

14 Sachin Jan 11, 05 50 20 Influent 6.5 538 1538 411 10493 ND ND

CETP,Surat (Grab)
(50 MLD)
Effluent 7.9 92 340 59 14102 ND ND

15 GVMSAV 2004-05 1.0 0.8 Influent 6.9 283 1028 335 ND

Odhav CETP,
Ahmedabad
Effluent 7.7 100 614 56 ND
Haryana
1 Kundli CETP 2004 1.1 0.7 Influent 9.6 297 851 285 ND ND 368
After P. Clarifier 8.5 334 726 195 679
Effluent 8.6 9 72 7.8 ND ND 604
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
Karnataka
1 Pai & Pai Dec 02- 0.3 0.05 Influent (Alkaline) 10.3 29 56 55 1115 ND 148
CETP EPTRI
Influent (Acidic) 2.4 47 224 <5 3435 ND 1059
Influent (Cyanide) 12.4 42 393 60 7370 ND 591
After 9.3 57 318 50 3530 ND 739
Clariflocculator
Effluent 7.5 37 206 65 2710 ND 665

RO feed 6.7 50 477 50 5910 ND 2510

RO permeate 6.3 26 103 <5 98 ND 22.2

2 Lidkar Oct 3, 02 1 0.15 Influent 7.03 143 428 272 3068 ND 852
Banglore CLRI
CETP
Effluent 7.01 41 453 280 3906 ND 1098
Maharashtra
1 Dombiveli Feb 17, 05 14 12 Influent 10.1 493 1330 404 3980 ND 1280
CETP Phase I (Grab)
Effluent 6.9 330 798 99 4910 ND 1660

--do-- March 2004 14 Influent ND 1379 1874 332 11134 ND ND

Effluent 560 1170 110 6149 ND ND

2 Dombiveli Feb 17, 05 1.5 1.5 Influent 9.4 538 1079 114 2494 ND 610
CETP Phase (Grab)
II
Effluent 7.4 287 559 121 7163 ND 1919

--do-- March 2004 1.5 Influent ND 200 1082 302 4431 ND ND

Effluent ND 37 273 24 6998 ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 1.5 0.3 Influent 7.3- 380- 1270- 3250 4500 ND 2290
B 7.6 600 1580
After P. Clarifier 6.7- 250- 1180- 10 5600 ND 2630
7.1 460 1460
Effluent 6.7- 80- 110 340- 150 8000 ND 3500
6.9 495

3 Thane Feb 16, 05 12 12 Influent 7.1 920 1733 171 3031 ND 1000
Belapur CETP (Grab)
Effluent 7.4 51 243 38 2534 ND 1070

--do-- Jan 2004 12 12 Influent ND 839 1818 520 3560 ND ND

Effluent ND 16 419 59 3560 ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IIT- 12 12 Influent 6.6- 320- 600- 70- 1870- ND ND

B 8.2 530 840 310 2890
After P. Clarifier 6.7- 250- 470- 80- 1750- ND ND
6.9 490 780 290 3100
Effluent 6.7- 10- 15 70- 300 40- 2530- ND ND
7.5 190 3130

4 Tarapur CETP Oct 26-27, 2 1.2 Influent 8.13 6512 12517 1081 28348 ND ND
04 For 24
hr
Effluent 6.04 30 533 196 3486 ND ND

--do-- Jan 2004 2 Influent ND 5530 10339 433 20293 ND ND

Effluent ND 186 1686 233 6997 ND ND

--do-- 2004-05 2 Influent 8.3 2480 11194 1056 ND ND ND

Effluent 6.7 27 652 224 ND ND ND
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
Tarapur CETP Dec 02-IITB 2 0.8 Influent 6.9 4920 13020 800- 26000 ND ND
1300
After P. Clarifier 8.0 3780 9110 ND ND ND ND
Effluent 7.6 57 1220 100- ND ND ND
1000

5 Taloja CETP Feb 16, 05 10 10.5 Influent 6.5 863 2174 941 4784 ND 2099
6.7 Effluent 170 806 190 6416 ND 2699

--do-- Jan 2004 10 Influent ND 342 1383 686 4366 ND ND

Effluent 141 727 118 5558 ND ND
--do-- 2004-05 10 Influent 7.1 92 417 172 ND ND ND
Effluent 7.1 8 201 78 ND ND ND

--do-- Dec 02-IITB 10 9.5 Influent 6.6- 220- 450- 490- 1730- ND ND
7.4 530 540 620 2740
After P. Clarifier 6.6- 110- 285- 115- 2000- ND ND
7.2 260 440 285 2380
Effluent 6.7- 10- 65 110- 110- 1875- ND ND
7.0 200 360 2240

6 Ambernath Dec 02-IITB 0.25 0.1 Influent 7.0- 35- 55 340- 100- 2650- ND ND
CETP 7.3 770 250 3470
After P. Clarifier 11.2 34- 60 250- 50- 2400- ND ND
11.4 300 220 5700
Effluent 7.4- 12- 13 110- 70- 3060- ND ND
8.0 120 90 6180

7 Jaisingpur Dec 02-IITB 1 0.8 Influent 7.1 190 800 600 3560 ND ND
CETP
Effluent 7.6 130 220 1500 3760 ND ND

8 Patalganga February 15 10 Influent 7.5 350 3283 2407 2684 ND 390

CETP 17, 2005
Effluent 7.6 16 125 25 2760 ND 480
--do-- March 2004 15 Influent
Effluent 263 482 42 921 ND ND

9 Mahad CETP March 2004 7.5 Influent 1546 4980 560 12955 ND ND
Effluent 621 1897 620 10140 ND ND
MP
1 Govindpura Nov 24-25, 0.9 0.492 Influent 6.94 742 1423 1352 ND 414 516
CETP, Bhopal 04 (24 hr)
UASB outlet 7.39 38 134 108 ND 452 574
Effluent 7.82 173 450 1676 ND 404 580
Punjab
1 Phillore CETP Jan 04 0.035 51% Influent 12.2 3180 5624 3319 ND ND ND
Effluent 8 27 81 36 ND ND ND
Rajasthan
1 Balotra CETP Dec 16-17, 6 5.784 Influent 7.01 360 856 638 27374 1028 1629
Unit I 04 (24 hr) 4
After P. Clarifier 7.2 93 515 268 27596 3488 1680
0
Effluent 7.64 44 222 224 27774 2696 1660
0

2 Jasol CETP Dec 18, 04 2.50 0 Influent

Effluent 6.2 435 3035 612 17962 1912 8400

3 Jodhpur Dec 19, 04 20 12 Influent (alkaline) 7.53 147 381 1230 ND 1455 15.5
CETP (Comp.)
Influent (acidic) 1.54 109 492 262 ND 640 625
After P. Clarifier 8.7 42 111 75 ND 1554 1450
Effluent 7.74 15 48 47 ND 1532 1515
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
4 Bhiwadi CETP Jan 12, 05 6 2.5+ Influent 6.6 567 1135 166 ND 1154 755
(under trial) (Grab) 3.5 sew
Effluent 7.16 254 731 122 ND 787 545

5 Pali CETP Jul 25, 8.4 40- Influent 8.4 625 2140 1736 9496 2890 2830
Unit II 2002 (Grab) 60%
Effluent 7.8 150 580 190 8846 2730 2610

--do-- Jul 26, 8.40 Influent 7.99 808 2218 1869 9040 1380 273
2002 (Grab)
Effluent 8.11 66 408 219 8272 1520 279

--do-- Jul 28, 8.40 Influent 8.32 871 2240 1373 14208 3280 2620
2002 (Grab)
Effluent 7.65 182 620 124 10380 3020 2430

--do-- Jul, 02 8.40 Influent 9.18 882 1836 1194 ND ND ND

(Grab)
After P. Clarifier 8.27 738 1566 503 ND ND ND
Effluent 8.8 51 488 241 ND ND ND

6 Pali CETP Jul 25, 9.00 40- Influent 7.3 488 1600 199 5910 2015 1930
Unit III 2002 (Grab) 60%
Effluent 7.2 109 400 114 5590 1920 1626

--do-- Jul 26, 9.00 Influent 8.36 874 1469 369 6060 1260 113
2002 (Grab)
Effluent 7.18 58 391 206 8552 1200 136

--do-- Jul 28, 9.00 Influent 7.4 583 1920 298 5942 2195 1850
2002 (Grab)
Effluent 7.13 131 440 156 5552 1860 1530

--do-- Jul, 02 9.00 Influent 8.26 684 1751 1001 ND ND ND

(Grab)
After P. Clarifier 8.01 640 1144 158 ND ND ND
Effluent 7.96 49 340 226 ND ND ND
Tamilnadu
1 Mannarai Sep 17, 04 4.2 3.5 Influent 9.14 145 360 310 7046 2720 3581
CETP, Tirupur (Comp.)
After P. Clarifier 9.07 130 216 116 7066 3774
Effluent 8.7 120 216 61 7060 2800 3774
-do- Dec 02- 4.2 3.5 Influent 7.9 133 435 320 8190 ND 4037
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 6.8 63 297 <5 7380 ND 3940
Effluent 6.9 33 198 10 7535 ND 3940

2 Kasipalayam Sep 17, 04 4 3 Influent 8.88 210 450 180 8380 3360 4162
CETP, (Comp.)
Tirupur
After P. Clarifier 8.78 180 360 37 8076
Effluent 8.05 195 288 35 8135 3000 4355
-do- Dec 02- 4 3 Influent 8.0 143 495 320 6560 ND 3172
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.8 108 356 15 6255 ND 3172
Effluent 7.7 35 218 20 5570 ND 2980

3 Veerapondi Sep 17, 04 10 9.6 Influent 8.82 190 450 160 7820 3880 3774
CETP, Tirupur (Comp.)
After P. Clarifier 9.15 170 324 29 7730
After S. Filter 8.85 153 288 23 7576 3560 3644
Effluent (after 7.63 150 288 30 7750 3560 3871
stabilization)
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
Veerapondi Dec 02- 10 9.6 Influent 8.2 120 436 110 8670 ND 4133
CETP, Tirupur EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.4 75 297 15 8350 ND 4133
Effluent 7.4 30 238 <5 8100 ND 4133

4 Manickapura Sep 17, 04 1.6 1.4 Influent 8.04 170 450 73 9224 3640 4742
m CETP, (Comp.)
Tirupur
Effluent 8.09 42 144 41 8400 3320 4258

-do- Dec 02- 1.6 1.4 Influent 7.2 109 356 40 10410 ND 5190
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.1 61 277 20 10430 ND 5575
Effluent 6.7 37 178 10 10600 ND 5479

5 Kunnankalpal Sep 16, 04 4.25 3.6 Influent 8.7 125 274 122 8052 3000 3871
ayam CETP, (Comp.)
Tirupur I shift
After P. Clarifier 9.19 115 342 127 8200 3871
After S. Filter 9.9 100 274 155 7434 ND 4065
Effluent (after 8.48 56 137 33 7300 4065
stabilization)

-do- Sep 16, 04 4.25 3.6 Influent 8.83 115 343 127 8200 ND 4162
(Comp.)
II shift
After P. Clarifier 9.39 100 240 33 7322 3871
After S. Filter 9.82 110 274 62 6404 2740 4258
Effluent (after 8.61 65 205 61 7358 3871
stabilization)

-do- Dec 02- 4.25 3.6 Influent 8.1 85 376 180 7900 ND 3845
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.4 60 198 5 6340 ND 3268
Effluent 7.0 28 158 15 7760 ND 3268

6 Andipalayam Sep 16, 04 5 3.5 Influent 8.56 115 409 161 9894 4400 4305
CETP, Tirupur (Comp.)
I shift
After P. Clarifier 8.6 100 254 29 8692 4340
Effluent 8.51 90 273 20 8816 ND 4511

-do- Sep 16, 04 5 3.5 Influent 8.31 140 545 312 9144 ND 4657
(Comp. II
shift
After P. Clarifier 8.66 95 212 28 8670 4462
Effluent 8.34 100 227 20 8698 4000 4413

-do- Dec 02- 5 3.5 Influent 7.8 93 317 260 8290 ND 4230
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 6.9 61 257 10 7880 ND 4130
Effluent 7.1 27 178 15 8040 ND 4130

7 Angeripalaya Sep 16, 04 8.5 7.2 Influent 8.48 190 636 100 7092 ND 3484
m CETP, (Comp. I
Tirupur shift
After P. Clarifier 9.09 145 382 37 6746 3484
Effluent 9.05 190 345 32 6736 ND 3387

-do- Sep 16, 04 Influent 8.72 180 509 73 7690 ND 3871

(Comp. II
shift
After P. Clarifier 9.06 190 364 39 6898 3871
Effluent 8.89 150 338 97 6850 ND 3581
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
Angeripalaya Dec 02- 8.5 7.2 Influent 8.1 109 396 100 8310 ND 3940
m CETP, EPTRI
Tirupur
After P. Clarifier 7.2 66 277 14 7580 ND 4037
Effluent 7.4 44 257 <5 7610 ND 4037

8 Chinnakkarai Sep 16, 04 5 4 Influent 8.14 125 342 159 9150 ND 4645
CETP Ltd., (Comp.) I
Tirupur shift
After P. Clarifier 8.04 125 219 89 8804 4645
Effluent 7.9 100 274 53 9404 ND 4936

-do- Sep 16, 04 Influent 8.33 170 548 122 10068 ND 5904
(Comp.) II
shift
After P. Clarifier 8.04 90 205 59 9682 4936
Effluent 7.91 100 247 57 9378 ND 4936

-do- Dec 02- 5 4 Influent 8.0 80 317 100 6510 ND 3268

EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.7 62 257 15 6240 ND 3172
Effluent 7.6 28 178 10 6060 ND 3172

9 Andakovil Sep 18, 04 Influent 9.5 123 175 ND 5654 1992 2581
CETP, Karur (Grab)
After P. Clarifier 10.6 ND ND ND 5248 2000 2396
Effluent 10.0 105 140 ND 3086 1200 1438

10 KS CETP, Sep 18, 04 Influent 7.6 52 88 ND 6338 1920 2949

Karur (Grab)
After P. Clarifier 8.8 ND ND ND 5376 1760 2360
Effluent 9.0 12 26 ND 6112 2080 2839

11 KKEL CETP, Sep 18, 04 1.3 1.1 Influent 8.9 115 307 ND 5032 2000 2489
Karur (Grab)
After P. Clarifier 11.2 ND ND ND 4352 1490 1899
Effluent 11 78 132 ND 4423 1780 1972

-do- Dec 02- 1.3 1.1 Influent 7.9 79 356 190 5130 ND 2692
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.0 50 257 10 4940 ND 2595
Effluent 7.2 26 158 10 5090 ND 2500

12 Sellandi Sep 18, 04 Influent 9.1 125 263 ND 4380 1740 2028
Palayam (Grab)
CETP, Karur
After P. Clarifier 10.2 ND ND ND 3674 1720 1585
Effluent 10.3 60 140 ND 3636 1660 1843

13 Thiruvai Sep 18, 04 2.1 1.5 Influent 7.1 43 175 ND 5460 1140 2028
CETP, Karur (Grab)
After P. Clarifier 10.1 ND ND ND 4460 1120 1751
Effluent 7.2 24 96 ND 4032 1420 1797

-do- Dec 02- 2.1 1.5 Influent 7.1 94 376 215 6700 ND 3268
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 6.8 60 238 <5 5790 ND 2190
Effluent 7.0 42 218 10 6600 ND 3172

14 Valandi Sep 18, 04 Influent 8.7 120 219 ND 5928 2740 2857
Dyeing CETP, (Grab)
Karur
After P. Clarifier 11.1 ND ND ND 5184 1920 2350
Effluent 9.8 90 211 ND 5160 2120 2581
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
15 Taluk Dye & Sep 18, 04 Influent 8.6 405 746 ND 12162 5000 5899
Bleaching (Grab)
CETP, Karur
After P. Clarifier 11.8 ND ND ND 6814 3140 3456
Effluent 8.3 218 386 ND 7286 2820 3410

16 Amaravathi Sep 18, 04 2.4 2 Influent 7.6 123 175 ND 3910 1320 1843
Poll Tech (Grab)
CETP, karur
After P. Clarifier 8.0 ND ND ND 3638 1300 1797
Effluent 8.2 125 278 ND 3362 1200 1659

-do- Dec 02- 2.4 2 Influent 7.5 84 317 215 4055 ND 2019
EPTRI
After P. Clarifier 7.2 54 178 85 4120 ND 1922
Effluent 7.3 22 119 <5 2580 ND 1346

17 TALCO Nov 3, 04 2.8 Influent 9.3 1470 3396 1000 13645 1720 6483
Vaniyambadi (Comp.)
Valayampet,
CETP, Vellore
After P. clarifier 8.7 1320 3018 610 15030 1280 7113
Effluent 8.5 340 868 124 ND 4040 6618

---do--- Dec 03, 02 2.8 2.4 Influent 8.24 1556 4627 3798 13304 ND 6679
CLRI
After P. clarifier 7.88 854 3792 2680 14262 ND 7252
After Anaerobic 7.84 466 1530 1434 9854 ND 4824
lagoon
Effluent (after ASP) 7.82 24 489 114 11413 ND 5093

---do--- Jul 23, 02 2.8 2.4 Influent 8.02 1370 3040 1884 12174 ND 5841
CLRI
After P. clarifier 7.9 660 2189 1117 11488 ND 5594
After Anaerobic 8.01 396 1557 634 9093 ND 4187
lagoon
Effluent (after ASP) 8.07 26 515 765 9899 ND 4820

18 TALCO Nov 3, 04 0.2 Influent 9.5 1260 3396 672 ND 1680 3196
Vaniyambadi, (Comp.)
Udayendiram
CETP, Vellore
After P. clarifier 8.5 720 1698 144 9336 2040 3872
Effluent 8.6 35 283 26 6336 1960 2161

---do--- Dec 3, 02 0.2 0.18 Influent 8.76 778 2160 1043 5636 ND 2041
CLRI
After P. clarifier 8.18 622 1506 366 5760 ND 1788
Effluent 7.94 24 324 94 4997 ND 1400
---do--- Nov 7, 02 0.2 0.18 Influent 9.06 1025 3018 2056 9308 ND 3019
CLRI
After P. clarifier 7.7 675 2023 296 8554 ND 2571
Effluent 7.62 38 544 132 6000 ND 1917

19 TALCO Nov 4, 04 0.9 Influent 10.5 1900 4716 2040 17720 3800 ND
Pernambut (Comp.)
CETP
After P. clarifier 9.7 950 2350 555 16945 3360
Effluent 8.3 35 264 80 14878 5320 ND
---do--- Dec 19, 02 0.9 0.48 Influent 10.5 1650 4100 1800 15200 ND 5800
CLRI
After P. clarifier 10.8 1443 3310 1277 13635 ND 5477
5
Effluent 7.6 45 546 150 11046 ND 5132
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
TALCO July 9, 02 0.9 0.48 Influent 8.88 872 2243 1539 5765 ND 3027
Pernambut CLRI
CETP
After P. clarifier 8.14 708 1776 343 6613 ND 3329
Effluent 7.73 45 847 1616 6806 ND 3910

20 TALCO Nov 4, 04 2 Influent 8.3 540 1132 335 7000 3200 2881
Ambur (Comp.)
Thuthipet
CETP, Vellore
After P. clarifier 8.0 475 755 116 9512 3240 2656
Effluent 7.6 28 189 27 7723 3520 2971

---do--- July 30, 02 2 1 Influent 7.93 947 2577 1680 9958 ND 4152
CLRI
After P. clarifier 8.17 1138 2101 802 9660 ND 4046
Effluent 7.85 47 835 510 10697 ND 4362

---do--- 2002 CLRI 2 1 Influent 9.2 1453 4490 4960 11900 ND ND

After P. clarifier 8.28 856 1122 1030 10823 ND ND
Effluent 7.65 42 450 150 10188 ND ND

21 Visharam Nov 5, 04 3.4 Influent 8.0 850 2136 515 14530 1580 4532
CETP, (Comp.)
Melvisharam
Vellore
After P. Clarifier 8.0 1150 1845 160 11554 1840 5400
After ASP clarifier 7.0 115 194 58 8846 ND 4050
Effluent (after PP) 7.0 80 233 14 7393 840 3857
---do--- Nov 11, 02 3.4 0.8 Influent 7.26 1100 3600 2100 12010 ND 5195
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.33 920 2800 1158 11904 ND 5112
After ASP clarifier 7.76 28 450 132 11030 ND 5211
Effluent (after 7.25 25 380 100 10906 ND 5154
polishing pond
---do--- Jul 2, 02 3.4 0.8 Influent 7.55 1680 5681 2626 11008 ND 5372
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.51 1110 2815 1200 12395 ND 6104
After ASP clarifier 7.82 22 651 360 8405 ND 4137
Effluent (after PP) 7.77 28 626 380 9292 ND 4490

22 TALCO Nov 5, 04 4 Influent 7.43 1310 5470.4 750 7940 1760 3568
Ranipet (Comp.)
CETP, Vellore
After P. Clarifier 7.78 ND ND 105 10055 2000 4146
Effluent 7.78 191 631.2 48 9878 1840 4532
---do--- Sep 24, 02 4 2.2 Influent 7.73 1276 3549 1900 10152 ND 4565
CLRI
After Pre-settler 7.43 1250 2362 1332 10400 ND 4505
After P. Clarifier 7.22 531 1436 1098 9332 ND 4800
After Anaerobic 7.39 430 1306 1002 9274 ND 4701
lagoon
After ASP Clarifier 7.63 29 427 568 10132 ND 4785
Effluent (After tert.. 7.76 19 285 80 10292 ND 4753
clarifier
---do--- May 7, 02 4 2.2 Influent 8.06 878 2635 2044 14320 ND 5726
CLRI
After Pre-settler 8.3 675 2065 1476 12518 ND 5297
After P. Clarifier 7.94 600 2221 1482 14342 ND 6583
After Anaerobic 7.77 445 1891 624 13260 ND 6457
lagoon
After ASP Clarifier 7.75 25 836 1246 14076 ND 6608
Effluent (After ter. 8.24 17 414 664 13576 ND 6474
clarifier
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
23 Melpudupet Nov 5, 04 Influent 6.72 1660 4628.8 575 5030 1000 2834
CETP, Ambur, (Comp.) 9
Vellore
After P. Clarifier 7.47 ND ND 142 3876 1280 9932
Effluent 7.92 197.4 841.6 65 3548 3120 1668
1

24 Ambur Nov 6, 04 1.1 Influent 9.0 960 2075 807 7420 3120 2701
Mallgalthope (Comp.)
CETP, Vellore
After P. Clarifier 9.1 760 1698 232 6336 3090 945
After Anaerobic 9.0 380 943 25 7078 3600 4547
lagoon
Effluent (after ASP) 7.0 90 490 20 8352 4000 3061

---do--- Nov 13, 02 1.1 0.4 Influent 6.93 1056 2615 790 7156 ND 2094
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.86 990 1946 759 7454 ND 2522
After Anaerobic 8.01 462 1331 196 6701 ND 2674
lagoon
Effluent (after ASP) 8.28 48 890 206 6174 ND 2598

---do--- 2002 CLRI 1.1 0.4 Influent 7.83 918 2230 1120 5430 ND ND
Effluent 8.65 30 473 128 4993 ND ND

25 SIDCO Nov 6, 04 2.5 Influent 6.72 ND 2524.8 570 5030 640 1687
Ranipet (Comp.) 4
CETP, Vellore
After P. Clarifier 7.47 ND ND 56 3876 1400 7521
Effluent (after ASP) 7.92 ND ND 4 3548 600 8196
Effluent (after filter) 7.45 380 1052 6 4558 880 9642

---do--- Sep 24, 02 2.5 1.5 Influent 5.3 1180 4158 1612 5904 ND 908
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.72 709 1978 542 4796 ND 830
Effluent 7.47 28 430 148 3948 ND 760

---do--- Jun 6, 02 2.5 1.5 Influent 4.01 1090 4465 1250 6378 ND 1029
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.68 986 1964 532 5844 ND 1140
Effluent 7.77 78 675 276 4168 ND 969

26 SIDCO phase Nov 6, 04 Influent 5.88 2200 3366.4 760 5320 800 964
II CETP (Comp.)
Ranipet,
Vellore
After P. Clarifier 7.44 ND ND 125 5915 880 1157
Effluent 8.19 274 946.8 32 5022 760 1157

27 TALCO Dec 11, 02 2.5 1.2 Influent 8.2 1810 4763 1608 18002 ND 7124
Dindigul CLRI
CETP
After Pre-settler 8.11 1622 4259 1340 17842 ND 7108
After P. Clarifier 7.93 1245 3710 742 16516 ND 7074
After Anaerobic 7.62 655 1940 540 12773 ND 6512
lagoon
Effluent 7.67 159 920 210 12019 ND 6532
---do--- Mar 27, 02 2.5 1.2 Influent 7.81 1500 3966 3796 17640 ND 6020
CLRI
After Pre-settler 7.5 1320 3891 3078 17050 ND 6412
After P. Clarifier 7.53 1080 3233 850 16842 ND 5976
After Anaerobic 7.48 720 2267 710 17404 ND 6242
lagoon
Effluent 7.58 225 1344 450 15988 ND 5978
 Date of Cap Flow,
S.N. CETP Sampling location pH BOD COD TSS TDS Na Cl
monitoring MLD MLD
28 TALCO Sep 17, 02 0.4 0.25 Influent 5.2 648 2647 986 6120 ND 936
Madhavaram CLRI
CETP,
Chennai
After P. Clarifier 7.22 397 1519 429 5346 ND 1020
Effluent 7.13 16 349 95 4620 ND 978

---do--- Mar 21, 02 0.4 0.25 Influent 6.00 512 2220 1176 4436 ND 912
CLRI
After P. Clarifier 7.14 418 1243 352 4732 ND 1011
Effluent 6.45 20 358 160 4632 ND 1074

29 Pallavaram Apr 17, 02 3 3 Influent 4.10 1215 3261 1154 5660 ND 1100
CETP, CLRI
Chennai
After P. Clarifier 8.42 760 2205 732 6424 ND 1468
Effluent 7.8 150 855 700 3952 ND 948

---do--- 2002 CLRI 3 3 Influent 4.5 1044 3090 1200 6575 ND ND

Effluent 7.27 35 475 219 4824 ND ND
UP
1 Kanpur CETP April 04 36 10 Influent 7.87 468 905 1995
Effluent 8.0 244 579 150

December 36 10 Influent 8.9 312 627 509

04
Effluent 8.5 137 247 77

May 17, 05 36 13.3 Influent 388 1208

Effluent 203 248

36 28 Influent-Tannery 8.5 1760 3292 2423 ND ND ND

Influent-Sewage 2.8 584 1179 468 ND ND ND
Mixed ( 1: 1.5) 7.6 903 1637 1027 ND ND ND
Outlet of Reactor-I 8 351 645 72 ND ND ND

Outlet of Reactor-II 8.1 340 707 86 ND ND ND

Final treated 7.5 283 560 58 ND ND ND
Effluent

2 Unnao CETP 2.15 80 Influent 8 693 2413 424 ND ND ND

After P.Clarifier 8.3 687 2186 230 ND ND ND
After Sec. clarifier-I 8.4 267 1104 258 ND ND ND
Effluent (after Sec. 8.5 26.5 365 169 ND ND ND
clarifier-II)

--do-- Dec, 2004 Influent 1493 3523 3293

Effluent 30 365 120

3 Mathura 6.25 60 Influent 7.6 118 680 195 ND ND ND

CETP
After P. Clarifier 7.5 75 561 172 ND ND ND
Effluent 7.5 67 654 238 ND ND ND

Standard for Irrigation 5.5 – 100 250 200 2100 -- 1000

9.0
Standard for Discharge in 5.5 – 30 250 100 2100 -- 600
surface waters 9.0
 Table 4 Metals and special parameters in effluent from CETPs, values in mg/l except pH
Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
AP
1 Jeedimetla CETP Dec 30, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 10310 771
(Comp.)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4583 13.5

2 Pattancheru CETP Dec 31, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1358 3736

(Comp.)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 844 894
Delhi
1 Wazirpur CETP Oct 9-10, 04 Influent BDL 41 14.5 4.3 BDL 0.97 ND ND
For 24 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.43 BDL 0.27 ND ND

2 Mangolpuri CETP Jun 28, 05 Influent 0.03 1.00 3.22 0.95 1.29 2.51 56.9 1354
For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.22 BDL 0.08 54.4 1136

3 Mayapuri CETP Jun 29, 05 Influent 0.05 0.68 1.20 0.31 0.18 2.16 57.6 119
For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 54.9 272

4 Lawrence Road Jun 30,05 Influent BDL 0.40 0.09 0.87 BDL 0.72 58.8 355
CETP For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.10 BDL BDL 63.7 464

5 Jhilmil CETP Aug 5-6, 04 Influent BDL 1.25 2.5 0.97 BDL 1.64 ND ND
For 24 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.06 BDL 0.03 ND ND

6 Badli CETP Influent

Effluent

7 Okhla Ind’l Area Jul 2, 05 Influent BDL 0.03 0.03 BDL BDL 0.56 75.7 265
CETP For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.08 65.9 253

8 GTK Road CETP Jun 27, 05 Influent BDL 4.00 4.88 1.57 2.18 16.3 69.6 385
For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.03 BDL BDL 65.6 506

9 SMA CETP Jul 1, 05 Influent BDL 1.62 0.45 1.15 BDL 0.22 33.1 1310
For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL 0.69 BDL BDL 28.8 1134

10 Nangloi CETP Jul 6, 05 Influent BDL 0.45 0.51 0.26 0.35 0.90 56.3 373
For 7 hr
Effluent BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL 0.06 52.4 228
Gujrat
1 Naroda CETP, 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 72
Ahmedabad
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 98

2 Vatva CETP, 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 140

Ahmedabad
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 98

--do-- Feb 2004 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 70

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 84
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
3 Odhav CETP, 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 123
Ahmedabad
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 54

4 Vapi CETP Jan 3, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3077 238

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3269 246

5 Nandesari CETP Sep 20-21, Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 5795 ND

04( 24 hr)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1744 ND

--do-- Jan 2004 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1137

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 67

6 Ankleshwar CETP Nov 18-19, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 22025 734

For 24 hr
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 308 56
--do-- April 2005 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 552
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 56

7 Sachin CETP-I Surat Jan 11, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1577 40

(0.5 MLD) (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 622 3.8

8 Sarigam CETP Jan 4, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 872 319

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 979 120

9 Dhareswar CETP, Jan 19, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 177 42

Jetpur (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 447 25

10 Jetpur CETP Jan 19, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 174 45

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 757 37

11 Panoli CETP, Sep 23-24, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1114

Bharuch ( 24 hr)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 414

12 Padra CETP, Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11.2

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 6.7

13 Sachin CETP-II Surat Jan 11, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 117 4.4

(50 MLD) (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 553 2.7

14 GVMSAV Odhav 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 105

CETP, Ahmedabad
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 121
Haryana
1 Kundli CETP Influent BDL BDL 0.04 BDL BDL ND ND ND
Effluent BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL ND ND ND
Karnataka
1 Pai & Pai CETP Dec 02-EPTRI Influent BDL BDL 0.09 0.91 0.07 0.20 85.2 53.2 2
(Alkaline) 7 2 4 7
Influent BDL 3.89 0.67 310 0.17 12.9 76.5 1014 4.48
(Acidic) 1 3
Influent BDL .196 2.66 16.4 0.1 3.79 96.8 381 81.2
(Cyanide)
Effluent BDL .052 0.43 1.33 0.06 0.14 93.4 675 BDL
4 1 1
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
Pai & Pai CETP Dec 02-EPTRI RO feed BDL .305 .218 6.07 .065 1 95.2 1029 10.4
RO BDL BDL BDL .032 .062 .039 98.3 8.58 BDL
permeate

2 Lidkar Banglore Oct 3, 02 Influent 0.05 34 BDL 0.38 0.44 0.4 75 397 ND
CETP CLRI
Effluent .005 14 BDL BDL 0.39 0.23 72 700 ND

Maharashtra
1 Dombiveli CETP Feb 17, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 885 32
Phase I (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1423 2

2 Dombiveli CETP Feb 17, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 513 36

Phase II (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 715 35

3 Thane Belapur CETP Feb 16, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 399 52

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 613 68

4 Tarapur CETP Oct 26-27, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 11025 3356

For 24 hr
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1173 186

--do-- 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1736

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 225

5 Taloja CETP Feb 16, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1269 187

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2122 236

--do-- 2004-05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 63

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2122 236

8 Patalganga CETP February 17, Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 776 20

2005
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 808 7

--do-- March 2004 Influent

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 28

9 Mahad CETP March 2004 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 308

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 336
MP
1 Govindpura CETP, Nov 24-25, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Bhopal (24 hr)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Rajasthan
1 Balotra CETP-I Dec 16-17, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1338 0.08
(24 hr)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1529 0.14

2 Jodhpur CETP Dec 19, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1661 ND

(Comp.) 19312
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 3824 ND

3 Bhiwadi CETP Jan 12, 05 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1619 ND

Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1242 ND

4 Pali CETP-II Jul 25, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2776 ND

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2506 ND
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
Pali CETP-II Jul 26, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2490 38.6
(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2792 15.7

--do-- Jul 28, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2627 37

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2421 11

5 Pali CETP-III Jul 25, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1814 ND

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 955 ND

--do-- Jul 26, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2348 40.7

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2342 19.9

--do-- Jul 28, 2002 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1945 61

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1033 41
Tamilnadu
1 Mannarai CETP, Sep 17, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 227
Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 400

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.33 ND 581 BDL
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 564 3.1

2 Kasipalayam CETP, Sep 17, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 304

Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 404

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.09 BDL BDL 0.08 ND 460 3.5
5
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.02 ND 300 1.8
1

3 Veerapondi CETP, Sep 17, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 696

Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 862

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.23 BDL BDL 0.07 ND 686 4.8
5 4
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 728 1.1

4 Manickapuram CETP, Sep 17, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 811

Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 792

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.09 ND 977 5.6
1
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.04 ND 906 2.8
4

5 Kunnankalpalayam Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 833

CETP, Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 833

-do- II shift Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 929

(Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 730

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.08 ND 626 5.0
3
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 600 BDL
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
6 Andipalayam CETP, Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 988
Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 637

-do- II shift Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 980

(Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 925

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.09 ND 522 BDL
1
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 634 BDL

7 Angeripalayam CETP, Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 606

Tirupur (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 333

-do- II shift Sep 16, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 323

(Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 446

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.10 BDL BDL 0.1 ND 535 BDL
5
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 660 2.5

8 Chinnakkarai CETP Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.13 BDL BDL 0.13 ND 390 BDL
Ltd., Tirupur 7
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 468 1.0

9 Andakovil CETP, Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 113

Karur (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 94

10 KS CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 127

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 212

11 KKEL CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 588

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 221

-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.20 BDL BDL 0.10 ND 323 BDL
6 2
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL BDL ND 530 3.1

12 Sellandi Palayam Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 116

CETP, Karur (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 150

13 Thiruvai CETP, Karur Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 173

(Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 232
-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.18 BDL BDL 0.14 ND 267 BDL
5 7
Effluent ND ND 0.08 BDL BDL 0.04 ND 374 BDL
1

14 Valandi Dyeing Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 172

CETP, Karur (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 299

15 Taluk Dye & Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 139

Bleaching CETP, (Grab)
Karur
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 338
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
16 Amaravathi Poll Tech Sep 18, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 90
CETP, karur (Grab)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 186
-do- Dec 02-EPTRI Influent ND ND 0.15 BDL BDL 0.12 ND 230 BDL
7 1
Effluent ND ND BDL BDL BDL 0.05 ND 231 BDL
5

17 TALCO Vaniyambadi Nov 3, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2291

Valayampet, CETP, (Composite)
Vellore
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1489
-do- Dec 03, 02 Influent .033 155 BDL 0.05 0.28 0.5 85 925 243
CLRI 5
Effluent .027 2 BDL 0.1 0.21 0.2 83 1019 68
2

-do- Jul 23, 02 Influent .048 67 3.1 BDL 0.39 0.48 85 1206 184
CLRI 4
Effluent .046 2 1.8 BDL 0.37 1.6 82 1109 174
3

18 TALCO Vaniyambadi, Nov 3, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 782

Udayendiram CETP, (Composite)
Vellore
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2312

-do- Dec 3, 02 Influent .029 33.2 BDL 0.1 0.22 0.25 83 576 146
CLRI
Effluent .025 0.83 BDL 0.08 0.14 BDL 81 838 49

-do- Nov 7, 02 Influent .037 230 0.5 0.85 0.27 0.5 83 1429 139
CLRI
Effluent .031 1.38 BDL 0.4 0.18 BDL 80 1235 40

19 TALCO Pernambut Nov 4, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1441

CETP (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1686

-do- Dec 19, 02 Influent .037 20 BDL 0.5 0.24 0.5 86 1210 205
CLRI
Effluent .032 0.35 BDL BDL 0.15 0.5 82 1375 100

-do- July 9, 02 Influent ND 13.7 4.3 0.83 ND 0.31 85 367 228

CLRI
Effluent ND 1.0 1.6 0.6 ND 0.14 83 855 228

20 TALCO Ambur Nov 4, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1681

Thuthipet CETP, (Composite)
Vellore
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1625

-do- July 30, 02 Influent 0.04 47 20.7 BDL 0.32 0.80 80 1273 218
CLRI
Effluent .024 1.4 6.6 BDL 0.15 0.20 75 1400 208

21 Visharam CETP, Nov 5, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1576

Melvisharam Vellore (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1482

-do- Nov 11, 02 Influent .039 13 2 0.11 0.47 BDL 88 434 162
CLRI
Effluent .027 BDL BDL BDL 0.22 BDL 77 1111 54
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
Visharam CETP, Jul 2, 02 CLRI Influent .062 71.5 4.5 0.68 0.68 0.7 80 300 200
Melvisharam Vellore
Effluent .047 0.7 3.8 0.5 0.41 BDL 75 997 140

22 TALCO Ranipet Nov 5, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

CETP, Vellore (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1513

-do- Sep 24, 02 Influent .027 50.1 BDL 0.35 0.32 33.9 77 788 175
CLRI
Effluent .024 1.45 BDL BDL 0.21 0.2 75 1190 27
1

-do- May 7, 02 Influent .049 18.9 0.02 0.65 0.43 0.02 78 1329 225
CLRI 5 8
Effluent .047 0.17 0.7 0.63 0.38 2.86 75 1135 26
4

23 Melpudupet CETP, Nov 5, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1813

Ambur, Vellore (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 2019

24 Ambur Mallgalthope Nov 6, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1788

CETP, Vellore (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1108

-do- Nov 13, 02 Influent 0.33 53 3.3 BDL 0.2 0.53 83 1577 108
CLRI
Effluent 0.24 1.6 7.2 BDL 0.12 0.28 80 1028 88

25 SIDCO Ranipet Nov 6, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1734.6

CETP, Vellore (Composite)
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1754.2

-do- Sep 24, 02 Influent .061 24.7 11.1 4.6 0.30 1.1 74 1435 70
CLRI 5 2
Effluent .038 1.98 BDL 0.25 0.24 4.4 73 1101 50
7

-do- Jun 6, 02 Influent ND 133 5.85 0.55 ND 6.0 75 1573 64

CLRI
Effluent ND 4 0.68 0.58 ND 2.22 72 1281 64

26 SIDCO phase II Nov 6, 04 Influent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1724.8

CETP Ranipet, (Composite)
Vellore
Effluent ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 1920.8

27 TALCO Dindigul Dec 11, 02 Influent .032 2.2 3.1 0.6 0.21 0.7 87 1004 161
CETP CLRI
Effluent .011 BDL 0.11 0.13 0.18 BDL 82 329 64

-do- Mar 27, 02 Influent .045 0.32 ND ND 0.4 ND 88 792 ND

CLRI
Effluent .042 .005 ND ND 0.37 ND 83 241 ND
5

28 TALCO Madhavaram Sep 17, 02 Influent .051 BDL 1.5 BDL 0.42 1.2 77 1516 69
CETP, Chennai CLRI
Effluent .028 1.6 BDL BDL 0.24 0.1 74 1517 58
-do- Mar 21, 02 Influent 0.08 71 1.7 BDL 0.81 1.9 75 930 66
CLRI
Effluent 0.05 0.4 BDL BDL 0.41 0.3 72 1392 88
 Date of Sampling
S.N. CETP Cd Cr Cu Ni Pb Zn %Na SO4 NH3-N
monitoring location
29 Pallavaram CETP, Apr 17, 02 Influent .053 64 5.6 0.08 0.47 0.85 78 1063 100
Chennai CLRI
Effluent .03 2.5 BDL BDL 0.29 0.80 74 866 98

UP
1 Kanpur CETP ND 136 ND ND ND ND ND 45
ND 1.43 ND ND ND ND ND BDL

2 Unnao CETP ND 152 ND ND ND ND ND ND

ND 2.55 ND ND ND ND ND ND

3 Mathura CETP BDL BDL 0.13 0.11 BDL ND ND ND

BDL BDL 0.11 0.04 BDL ND ND ND

Standard for Irrigation NS NS NS NS NS NS 60 1000

Standard for Discharge in surface 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 0.1 5.0 NS 1000 50
waters
BDL- below detection limit ; ND- not determined
 Table 5 Hazardous sludge / solid waste generation and handling in CETPs
S. No. CETP Type of industries On site storage/ Ultimate disposal of sludge
AP
1 Jeedimetla CETP 34 Dye & intermediate, About 2-2.5 MT /d sludge is generated. Sludge is stored
chemical within CETP premises.
2 Pattancheru CETP 104 Pharmaceuticals, About 8-10 cum /d sludge is generated. Sludge is disposed
Chemical, Steel, Pesticides, in secured landfill in Didigul
leather
3 Bollaram CETP 24 Pharmaceuticals, chemical Sludge is temporarily stored within CETP premises in
sludge lagoons which have not been cleaned so far
Delhi
1 Wazirpur CETP Pickling and general Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
2 Mangolpuri CETP General Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
3 Mayapuri CETP General Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
4 Lawrence Road CETP Food processing and general Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
5 Jhilmil CETP Engineering and general Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
6 Badli CETP Pickling Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
7 Okhla Ind’l Area General and textile Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
CETP temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
8 GTK Road CETP General Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
9 SMA CETP General Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
10 Nangloi CETP Rubber products and general Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
11 Narela CETP General Sludge is stored within CETP premises, a new common
temporary storage site will be developed by Dec 2005
Gujrat
1 Naroda CETP, 229 Dye & dye intermediate, About 5 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for land
Ahmedabad Pharma. Textile & Chemicals filling.
2 Vatva CETP, 437 Pharmaceuticals, Dye & About 8 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for land
Ahmedabad intermediate, filling.
Textile,Chemicals Rolling mills
3 Odhav CETP, 57 Dye&dye intermediate, About 1.2 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for
Ahmedabad Textiles land filling.
4 Vapi CETP, Vapi, 777 Paper mills, Chemicals, About 300-400 MT/month sludge is sent for disposal at
Valsad Pharma, Dye & Dye CHWTSDF-Waste Management Company site, Vapi.
intermediates, Plastic Engg. About 200-300 MT/month sec. sludge is also generated.
5 Nandesari CETP, 166 Chemical, Organic About 60 MT/month sludge is disposed off at CHWTSDF-
Vadodara chemicals, Dyes & NECL, Nandesari
intermediate
6 Ankleshwar CETP 263 Dyes & intermediate, About 3100 MT/m sludge generated is sold to the cement
Pesticides, Chemical, industries/ sent to CHWTSDF-BEIL site, Ankleshwar
Pharma.
7 Sachin CETP-I, 38 Dyes & dye intermediate Sludge is disposal off at HWTSDF-M/s Gujrat Enviro
Sachin, Surat Protection and Infrastructure Ltd. (GEPIL) site, Surat
8 Sarigam CETP, 17 Chemical, Pharma, About 6 MT/month sludge is sent for disposal at
Sargam, Valsad Dyes&dye intermediate CHWTSDF-Waste Management Company site, Vapi
9 Dhareswar CETP, 23 Textile printing units About 1 MT/month sludge is sent for disposal at
Jetpur CHWTSDF-NEPL site, Odhav
10 Sanand CETP, Paldi, Chemicals, Pharma. Dyes, About 3 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for land
Ahmedabad Pesticides, petrochemical filling.
11 Jetpur CETP, Jetpur 972 Textile printing units About 2 MT/month sludge is sent for disposal at
CHWTSDF-NEPL site, Odhav
12 Panoli CETP, 101 Chemical, Pharma, About 300 MT/annum sludge is disposed off at CHWTSDF-
Bharuch Dyes&dye intermediate BEIL site, Ankleshwar or CHWTSDF-NECL site, Nandesari
13 Padra CETP,
14 Sachin CETP-II, 71 Textile dyeing and printing About 35-40 MT/day sludge is disposal off at HWTSDF-M/s
Sachin, Surat units Gujrat Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Ltd. sites, Surat
15 GVMSAV Odhav 264 Dye & Dye intermediate
CETP, Ahmedabad
S. No. CETP Type of industries On site storage/ Ultimate disposal of sludge
16 Narol CETP,
Ahmedabad
Haryana
1 Kundli CETP 198 Milk/ food processing, Sludge is stored unscientifically within CETP premises
textile, rubber, leather
Karnataka
1 Pai & Pai CETP 26 metal finishing inits
2 Lidkar Banglore CETP 5 Tannery About 0.11 MT/d sludge is stored in a impervious sludge
storage yard within CETP premises
Maharashtra
1 Dombiveli CETP 118 Textile industries About 100 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai
Phase-I waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
2 Dombiveli CETP 157 Multiple/mixed industries About 120 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai
Phase-II waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
3 Thane Belapur CETP 480 Dye & Intermediate Drug About 8 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is sent to
intermediate, Pharmaceuticals CHWTSDF site at TTC
Chemicals(1905 non member)
4 Tarapur CETP 208 Pharma., Chemical, About 6 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-Mumbai
Dye&dye intermediate waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
5 Taloja CETP 780 Pharma & other industries About 2 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is sent to
CHWTSDF- Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
6 Ambernath CETP Chemical and Dyes About 0.15 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for
land filling.
7 Jaisingpur CETP Textile, Chemicals, Dairy, About 0.3 MT/d sludge is generated. Sludge is used for
Auto parts, Batteries land filling.
8 Patalganga CETP Chemical, Textile, About 10-11 MT/month sludge is sent to CHWTSDF-
Petrochemical Mumbai waste Management Ltd. site at Taloja
9 Mahad CETP
10 Badlapur CETP
11 Butibari CETP
MP
1 Govindpura CETP, 34 Industries Sludge from UASB is directly discharged into drain
Bhopal
Punjab
1 Phillore CETP 28 Tanneries Sludge is stored within CETP premises
(27 vegetable, 1 chrome)
2 Jalandhar CETP 67 tanning and allied
industries
(39 chrome)
Rajasthan
1 Balotra CETP 600 Textile dyeing and Sludge is dumped unscientifically within CETP premises. A
Unit I printing (CETP designed for common secured land fill site is to be developed in 50
319 units) hectare land for Balotra, Jasol and Bithuja CETPs
2 Jasol CETP 60 Textile dyeing and printing Sludge is dumped unscientifically within CETP premises. A
common secured land fill site is to be developed in 50
hectare land for Balotra, Jasol and Bithuja CETPs
3 Jodhpur CETP 100 Stainless steel pickling Sludge stored in a pucca pit within CETP premises. A 25
and 150 Textile dyeing and acre land has been identified and EIA study is being
printing carried out for setting secured land fill site.
4 Bhiwadi CETP 55 industries + sewage No arrangement for disposal of ludge
5 Pali CETP 473 Textile units+ sewage for About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three
Unit I Unit I&II CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd.
6 Pali CETP About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three
Unit II CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd.
7 Pali CETP 292 Textile units+ sewage About 300 MT/month sludge generated from the three
Unit III CETPs at Pali is dumped unscientifically near Puniyata rd.
8 Machheri CETP, 9 Tannery No arrangements for disposal of sludge
Jaipur
Tamilnadu
1 Mannarai CETP, 20 Textile About 4.9 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Tirupur premises
2 Kasipalayam CETP, 19 Textile About 2 MT/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and
Tirupur stored within CETP premises
3 Veerapondi CETP, 75 Textile About 10 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Tirupur premises
4 Manickapuram CETP, 10 Textile About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Tirupur premises
S. No. CETP Type of industries On site storage/ Ultimate disposal of sludge
5 Kunnangalpalayam 18 Textile About 30 m3/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and
CETP, Tirupur stored within CETP premises
6 Andipalayam CETP, 21 Textile About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Tirupur premises and covered with HDPE sheet
7 Angeripalayam CETP, 72 Textile About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Tirupur premises and covered with HDPE sheet
8 Chinnakkarai CETP 31 Textile About 2.5 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
Ltd., Tirupur premises
9 Andakovil CETP, Sludge is stored within CETP premises
Karur
10 KS CETP, Karur Sludge is stored within CETP premises
11 KKEL CETP, Karur 47 Textile About 2.7 MT/d sludge is packed in polythene bags and
stored within CETP premises
12 Sellandi Palayam Sludge is stored within CETP premises
CETP, Karur
13 Thiruvai CETP, Karur 55 Textile About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
premises
14 Valandi Dyeing CETP, Sludge is stored within CETP premises
Karur
15 Taluk Dye & Sludge is stored within CETP premises
Bleaching CETP,
Karur
16 Amaravathi Poll Tech 44 Textile About 1 MT/d sludge is stored on ground within CETP
CETP, karur premises
17 TALCO Vaniyambadi 110 Tannery About 9 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within
CETP, Vellore CETP premises
18 TALCO Vaniyambadi, 10 Tannery About 0.2 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill at
Udayendiram CETP, Valaympet CETP premises
Vellore
19 TALCO Pernambut 10 Tannery About 10 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard in
CETP unscientific manner within CETP premises
20 TALCO Ambur 34 Tannery About 3 MT/d sludge is stored in a impervious place within
Thuthipet CETP, CETP premises
Vellore
21 Visharam CETP, 22 Tannery About 2 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within
Melvisharam Vellore CETP premises
22 TALCO Ranipet 77 Tannery About 4 MT/d sludge is disposed in secured landfill within
CETP, Vellore CETP premises
23 Melpudupet CETP, ? Sludge is dumped in an unscientific manner
Ambur, Vellore
24 Ambur Mallgalthope 7 Tannery About 1 MT/d sludge is stored in Thuthipet CETP sludge
CETP, Vellore yard
25 SIDCO Ranipet 86 Tannery About 3 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard within
CETP, Vellore CETP premises. Sludge is also converted into vermin
compost in batches
26 SIDCO phase II Sludge is dumped in an unscientific manner
CETP Ranipet,
Vellore
27 TALCO Dindigul 45 Tannery About 1.5 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard
CETP within CETP premises
28 TALCO Madhavaram 14 Tannery About 0.35MT/d sludge is stored within CETP premises
CETP, Chennai
29 Pallavaram CETP, 125 Tannery About 10 MT/d sludge is stored in sludge storage yard
Chennai within CETP premises
UP
1 Kanpur CETP 354 Tanneries Sludge is disposed on land by Kanpur Nagar Nigam
2 Unnao CETP 21 Tanneries Sludge is stored within CETP premises
3 Mathura CETP 30 Textile dyeing and printing Sludge is stored within CETP premises
West Bengal
1 Calcutta Leather About 540-550 tanneries Temporary sludge storage facility for 5000 to 6000 MT is
Complex CETP processing 1000 MT hides to under construction within CETP premises. A secured land
be shifted to Calcutta Leather fill site is proposed to be developed in 51 acre land
Complex
 Table 6 List of proposed CETPs
S. CETP site Cap. MLD Capital Construction stage Type and number of industries
No cost, lac
AP
1 Enumamula
2 Jammapur
Delhi
1 Najafgarh Road I.E. 9.6
2 Naraina I.E. 21.6
Gujrat
1 Kadodar, Palsana 100 477.84 Under construction Textiles
Haryana
1 Kundli-2 4+2+3 4 MLD under construction
2 Jind
Himachal Pradesh
1 Barotiwala I.E.
2 Parwanoo I.E.
3 Melatpur
4 Kala Amb
Maharashtra
1 Lote Parshuram 6 Primary under construction 42 Pesticides, Dye & Dye
intermediate, Paint,
Petrochemical
2 Roha Under construction 13
3 Dombivili-3 200
4 Tarapur-2 25 Prim.-Oct 05, Sec.-Dec 05 915
5 Kherana, Navi Mumbai
6 Chikhloli Morivili, 0.8 130 Bulk drugs & int-71, Textiles-2,
Ambernath Dyes & dye intermediate-2
M.P.
1 Gwalior 74
2 Raipur 74
Punjab
1 Ludhiana-1
2 Ludhiana-2
3 Ludhiana-3
4 Amritsar
Rajasthan
1 Balotra 12.00 Under construction 600 Dyeing and printing
Unit II
2 Bithuja 30.00 Under construction 161 Textile mercerizing&
bleaching
3 Sumerpur
Tamilnadu
1 Chettithangal 139 11
2 Eruguthimallnedu 154 10
3 Perumalpet 552 50
4 Puddur 142 9
5 Mitta 259 19
6 Standard Effluent 245 21
7 Erode-1 1025 77
8 Erode-2 102 211
9 Erode-3 400 191
10 Karur-1 172 49
11 Karur-2 214 49
12 Karur-3 143 58
13 Karur-4 177 62
14 Karur-5 168 80
15 Karur-6 225 135
16 Kodaikanal 103 93
17 Chennimalai 98 81
18 Kumarapalyam 100 120
19 Anaipalayam 543 57
20 Mangalam 408 42
21 Kulathupalyam 553 62
S. CETP site Cap. MLD Capital Construction stage Type and number of industries
No cost, lac
22 Muruganpalyam 525 53
23 Kasipalyam 500 86
24 Cuddalore 411 28
25 Ambur 165 18
UP
1 Raipur, Rania, Kanpur 6 364 Ed.oil refineries, Textiles, Steel,
Chemicals, Paper, Tanneries(80)
West Bengal
1 Calcutta Leather 6 units of 5 2 -U/C(adv. stage) About 550 tanneries processing
Complex CETP MLD each 2-U/C(work started) 1000 MT hides to be shifted to
the Complex
2 Kalaidanga 6000 600
3 Behala
4 Kasba