STM3105 Simple Ranking Test
STM3105 Simple Ranking Test
GROUP: K2 (B5)
Sample
‘Rank’ total for
Panelist A B C D E F each panellist
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
3 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
4 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
5 1 2 3 4 6 5 21
6 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
7 1 2 3 4 5 6 21
‘Rank’ Total 7 14 21 28 36 41 147
Hypothesis:
H0: µA = µB = µC = µD = µE = µF
Ha: µA ≠ µB ≠ µC ≠ µD ≠ µE ≠ µF
χ2𝑟 =
12 ⎡ 𝐸12 + 𝐸22 +............ + 𝐸𝑛2 ⎤ - [ 3𝑛 (𝑝 + 1) ]
𝑛𝑝(𝑝+1) ⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
=
12 ⎡ 72 + 142 + 212 + 282 + 362 + 412 ⎤ - [ 3(7) (6 + 1) ]
7(6)(6+1) ⎢ ⎥
⎣ ⎦
12
= 294
(4447) - 147
= 34.51
From Table, critical χ2𝑟 (Appendix F), df= p-1= 5, and α = 0. 05, 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
χ2𝑟 = 11.1
Thus, calculated χ2𝑟 > critical χ2𝑟, it can be concluded that there is a significant
difference (p < 0.05) among samples in terms of yellowish in colour of turmeric
powder at α = 0. 05.
Once the sensory specialist determines that the calculated χ2𝑟 is significant, then a
comparison of rank total separation is done to determine which sample differs from
one another by using a Least Significant Difference (LSD) post-hoc test.
iii) LSD for Friedman test (Revisited formula)
1/2
LSD = tα=0.05, dk → ∞ x (𝑛𝑝 (𝑝 + 1)/𝑑𝑓 ) where, 𝑡 α=0.05, 𝑑𝑘 →∞ = 1.96
(two-tailed)(Appendix 1)
1/2
= 1.96 (7(6) (6+1)/5)
= 15.06 → 15
Therefore, test of significant difference for all possible pairs needs to be done.
F E D C B A
41 36 28 21 14 7
a
b
c
d
Samples sharing the same significant letter/under the same line show no significant
difference in terms of yellow color strength at α=0.05 (p > 0,05)
𝑑
A 7
𝑐𝑑
B 14
𝑏𝑐𝑑
C 21
𝑎𝑏𝑐
D 28
𝑎𝑏
E 36
𝑎
F 41
iv) Graph
Sample A B C D E F
Sample A B C D E F