2018 Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice CSWP

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF
SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
COD
SOCIA E OF
L
PRA WORK
FAMIL CTICE IN
Y SE
CENT RVICE
RES
Foreword
Family Service Centres (FSCs) are one of the key social work agencies by which Singapore seeks to respond to
the individual, family and community problems and needs of its population. Throughout the history of FSCs, the
provision of social work services has been a key part of the professional service response.
Reflecting the importance of the ‘social work effort’ within FSCs, there has been a desire amongst the Ministry of
Social and Family Development (MSF) and FSC practitioners to provide a clear descriptor of social work practice
within an FSC and its expected standard. With this descriptor, three outcomes will be derived. Firstly, to generally
distinguish the social work effort from other FSC intervention efforts. Secondly, to acknowledge common aspects
of intervention shared with other professions. Thirdly, to identify more clearly the service components of social work
practice within an FSC.
The development of a Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice (FSC-CSWP) is an exciting opportunity
in the history of FSCs. The consultative development of the FSC-CSWP provided an opportunity to best consider:
• Who the clients are;
• What the problems and the consequent service needs are; and
• How Social Work Practitioners (SWPs) can appropriately, effectively and efficiently respond to these needs.
The FSC-CSWP recognises the variety and range of cases now presenting to the FSCs. These cases vary significantly
in complexity, risk and service demands. The FSC-CSWP clearly positions itself in relation to the balance of these
three aspects.
The FSC-CSWP also orientates the predominant social work effort within an FSC towards a more comprehensive
effort in responding to cases which have greater degree of case complexity, risk and service demand needs. In
addition, the FSC-CSWP provides a means to sustain intervention outcomes through different methods of practice.
The FSC-CSWP upholds the social work professional responsibility whilst maintaining this sustainability.
Ms Denise Low
Director
Service Development and Management Division
Ministry of Social and Family Development
FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 1

“Social Work involves entering into the lives of people who
are in distress, conflict or trouble. To do this requires not only
technical competence but also qualities of integrity, genuineness
and self-awareness”.
Lishman (1994: 89)
2 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

Acknowledgements
This document outlines the expected standard of social work practice in Family Service Centres (FSCs). It marks the
completion of a four-stage consultation and development process initiated by the National Council of Social Service
(NCSS), in partnership with key service stakeholders in FSCs and the Ministry of Social and Family Development
(MSF). With a move of MSF-funded programmes from NCSS to MSF in July 2013, MSF continued the consultation
and development process.
Stage One involved extensive consultation with FSCs through focus group discussions and agency visits on the
nature of social work practice in FSCs. In Stage Two, the FSC-CSWP draft was communicated to the FSCs to
provide an understanding to the scope, content and structure of the FSC-CSWP. Feedback and concerns were
collated for revision of the draft FSC-CSWP. This consultation and the following ones were conducted in smaller
groups to ensure ample opportunities and time for SWPs in the FSCs to voice their concerns and share their views.
In Stage Three, the key areas of varying positions were surfaced for discussions. These included the way in which
clients are served through the various methods of practice in the FSCs and the target client groups served by the
FSCs.
In the final Stage Four, consensus to the varying positions were concluded and shared with the FSCs. Numerous
revisions were made thereafter, taking into consideration the feedback and questions raised by the various
stakeholders, in relation to social work practice in FSCs.
For the completion of the FSC-CSWP, we would like to extend our gratitude and appreciation to all who have
contributed to the completion of this FSC-CSWP, with special mention to:
FSC Social Work Practitioners

for all the time, active participation in discussions and continual feedback given to develop the FSC-CSWP. This
document is reflective of local social work practice in the FSCs and a partnership between NCSS, MSF, External
Consultant and the FSCs.
Master Practice Leaders

for their continual active involvement and provision of inputs in refining the draft to this final document so that it may
accurately reflect the social work effort within the FSCs.
Mr Bong Benny
Ms Choy Puay Wun
Dr Katijah Bte Mohamed Dawood
Mrs Lee Yean Wun
Dr Ng Chee Keong Vincent
Mr Udhia Kumar S/O Mukaya
Ms Yogeswari D/O Munisamy
Committee for Practice Standards

for providing the lead and support throughout the development process and setting aspirational standards in the
FSC-CSWP.
Mrs Lee Yean Wun, Chairperson

Ms Chee Liee Chin, Member
Mr Joachim Lee, Member
Mr Mohd Ali Bin Mahmood, Member
Dr Ng Chee Keong Vincent, Member
Mr Samuel Ng, Member
Ms Wu Mei Ling, Member
Staff of Service Development and Management Division

Mr Shawn Koh
Mr Phua Chun Yat
Ms Ng Peck Hoon
Mr Wilson Mack
Ms Esther Tan
Mr Paulus Sutjipto
Ms Poon Shen Lynn

ABOUT FSC-CSWP (ver. 1.0)
The Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice (FSC-CSWP) 1.0 provides an important updates from the
earlier version of FSC-CSWP Development Version 5.1 in order to bring about better clarity about the intent and the
objectives of FSC-CSWP. Operational definitions are also included to make the definitions more relevant to FSCs’
use.
A conceptual diagram on the integration of FSC methodogies is also included in this version. It is intended to depict
how the longer term FSC practice would look like.
We have also apprised the principles of professional social work practice in the FSC-CSWP version 1.0 which are
essential in FSCs’ practices regardless of methodologies used.

Contents
Introduction 6
1 Mission and Role of FSCs 6

2 Framing the Social Work Role within the Mission of FSCs 6
3 Purpose of the FSC-CSWP Document 6
4 Definitions 7
Definition of Social Work 7
Place of the Social Work Profession in an FSC 8
Definition of Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice 8
Frameworks of the FSC-CSWP 10
1 The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework 10

a. Continuum of Practice 10
i. Risk and Complexity Classification 10
ii. Levels of Intervention Classification 12
b. Methods of Practice 13
i. Casework Practice 14
ii. Group Work Practice 15
iii. Community Work Practice 16
2 Framework Summary 22
Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice 24
1 Functions of the FSC-CSWP 24

2 Application of the FSC-CSWP 24
3 Integration with Code of Professional Ethics 25
4 Guiding Principles of the FSC-CSWP for SWPs 25
5 Structure of the Practice Domains of the FSC-CSWP 26
Practice Domains of the FSC-CSWP 28
Domain 1: Working with Individuals, Families and Communities in a Professional Manner 28

Domain 2: Working in an Ethical Manner 36
Domain 3: Working in an Organisational Setting 38
Domain 4: Working with Reflective Practice 40

TABLES & DIAGRAMS
Table 1: FSC-CSWP Groups and Definitions 11

Table 2: Types of Group Work in FSCs 17
Table 3: Overview of the Structure of the Practice Domains of FSC-CSWP 27
Diagram 1: Values, Knowledge and Skills of Social Work Practitioners 8

Diagram 2: Appropriate and Effective Practice 8
Diagram 3: Risk and Complexity Classification for FSC-CSWP Group 2 to 4 12
Daigram 4: Continuum of Practice 13
Diagram 5: Stages of Casework Practice 15
Diagram 6: Framework for Community Work in FSCs 19
Diagram 7: Continuum of Integration 21
Diagram 8: Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework 22
Diagram 9: Processes through the Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework 23
Diagram 10: FSC-CSWP in relation to the FSC Service Model 24
T
References 43
Appendix A 44

Introduction
1 Mission and Role of Family Service Centres
Family Service Centres (FSCs) are community-based social work agencies that provide social support relating
to the family. FSCs will focus on providing support to the low-income and vulnerable families predominantly
through the provision of professional social work services. The long-term goal of FSC services is for families
served to achieve independence, resilience and stability to manage life’s challenges.
The FSC Service Model outlines the scope of work that should be undertaken by an FSC. The Family Service
Centre Code of Social Work Practice (FSC-CSWP), in addition to the FSC Service Model, details the key
components of professional social work practice.
2 Framing the Social Work Role within the Mission of FSCs
The social work profession contributes three areas in the provision of FSC services:
• A historical and contemporary psychosocial ‘person-in-environment’ understanding of human problems

and needs;
• An integrated preventive and responsive practice to address needs and risks; and
• An integrated utilisation of casework, group work, community work and social policy and research
intervention strategies.
The FSC-CSWP is shaped by the mission of FSCs to respond to both the generic and higher need and risk
client base of FSCs. This dual focus means that the FSC-CSWP is to to be positioned upon four service
approach principles:
i. Prioritisation towards more vulnerable and at-risk populations;

ii. Prioritisation of professional assessment and timely response to the needs of vulnerable and at-risk
populations;
iii. Provision of multiple entry points for individuals and families; and
iv. Provision of sequential services of casework, group work and community work dependent on the
assessment of needs and risks of clients.
3 Purpose of the FSC-CSWP Document
Society has a right to expect that FSC Social Work Practitioners (SWPs) will provide services of high
professional standards.
The FSC-CSWP is a key means through which the scope and component activities of professional social
work practice are identified. This identification provides clarification to SWPs themselves, clients, partners
and the community on the extent of the social work practice mandate and the component professional
activities of this mandate. FSC SWPs are expected to perform at the required level of competency as dictated
by these practice standards outlined in the FSC-CSWP.
The development of the FSC-CSWP provides a significant means of ensuring public faith in the legitimacy and
capacity of social work practice in FSCs. This has to be supported by practices that adhere to the standards
set by the FSC-CSWP. Most importantly, SWPs are able to carry out their duties confidently knowing that their
practice meets the professional standards articulated by the larger FSC practice community.
4 The Four Principles of Professional Social Work Practice
The core element that sets apart professional practice from that conducted by a layperson is the higher-order
thinking and reasoning skills. Additionally, professional social work practice requires that there be structure
and rigour in critically thinking through the case, competencies in being able to undertake adequate and
appropriate intervention, and good analytical skills to reflect and evaluate practice.
The following four principles undergird the intentionality and manner in which professional social work practice
is to be undertaken.

i. Practice is logically sequenced and reasoned
Professional social work practice is a sequence of ordered activities commencing from the point of
referral through to case closure. The fundamental elements of engaging clients and their issues in
order to better understand and subsequently respond to those issues, followed by evaluation of the
entire process is analogous across agency and practice contexts. Although not every case will proceed
through all the stages from referral to case closure, they must nonetheless be treated as an operational
journey that the worker, the client and the agency embark on.
In tandem with logically sequenced practice, it is also acknowledged that practice is not to be undertaken
without thinking and proper consideration. Logical thinking and reasoning form the foundational
platform of all professional practice. It is the ability to think through a case situation from a presenting
‘story’ (i.e. what the client is saying and presenting with) through to the formulation of a professional
case.
ii. Practice is theoretically informed and directed
All logical thinking is guided, supported and informed by theoretical ideas. Theories provide the
conceptual language and causal structure to think through a case as it is converted from a story to a
case in logical thinking and as it is responded to. Concurrently, it is important that the conceptual ideas
of the theories be weighed against their relevance and appropriateness to the needs of the case, and
that only theoretical ideas which have practice validity be utilised in guiding the logical thinking and
reasoning through the case. In addition to theoretical ideas and frameworks, knowledge of relevant and
up-to-date legislations, policies and protocols are equally important in informing, guiding and directing
professional practice.
iii. Practice is purposive
While the concept of ‘therapeutic alliance’ is important for practice, the danger lies in seeing this as an
end in itself. Hence the purpose of entering into and forming professional working relationships with
clients and/or their families must also be to facilitate the changes to achieve the outcomes that the
client and worker had agreed upon.
iv. Practice integrates multiple methods and approaches
Integrated practice refers to the utilising and integration of different practice modalities from casework
to group work and community work in order to ensure that intervention and service responses are
better matched to the needs of the individual and/or family at that point in time. Hence, integrating
multiple methods of practice would help to alleviate casework ‘drifts’.
5 Definitions
Definition of Social Work
The International Federation of Social Workers (IFSW) recognises that the profession of social work practises
within a diversity of social settings. The principles of humanitarianism and democratic ideals underpin the
social work profession. The IFSW (2004) notes:
“Professional social workers are dedicated to service for the welfare and self-fulfilment of
human beings; to the development and disciplined use of scientific knowledge regarding
human behaviour and society; to the development of resources to meet individual, group,
national and international needs and aspirations; to the enhancement and improvement of
the quality of life of people; and to the achievement of social justice.”
(2004, IFSW, Ethics Statement, p.1)

Social workers work towards the objectives of the profession within an increasingly complex and difficult environment.
This environment within which practice is undertaken is characterised by three distinguishing features:
Uncertainty – the best objectives or the best ways to work with an individual(s) can never be ‘known’ in
any absolute sense. Practice decisions, although needing to be made with professional confidence, always
remain within a context of uncertainty.
Contested – within a democratic society, there are many views on how complex social, inter- and intra-
personal problems should be responded to. The voice or position of social worker will be contested as part
of the discussions and debates in relation to appropriate and effective practice.
Accountability – social workers practise within an environment of multiple levels of statutory, legal, community,
and professional accountability. The rationale for and demonstration of the appropriateness and effectiveness
of competent professional practice are essential components of accountable practice.
SWPs in FSCs must practise within this uncertain, contested and accountable practice environment in a professionally
competent manner.
This professional helping process of utilising values, knowledge and skills may be represented as follows:
Diagram 1: Values, Knowledge and Skills of Social Work Practitioners
Values Knowledge Skills

A capacity to undertake logically An appropriate use of interpersonal
developed, considered and reasoned communication
practice
A public and articulated A sensitivity and ability to apply multiple An awareness and utilisation of the
value and ethical base levels of explanatory analysis professional role
A consistent and informed professional, An insight into the role of self

theoretical and research knowledge base
Adapted from “Professionally Accountable Practice – A practice manual for logical reasoning in practice.” by P. Meemeduma, 2002, Unpublished
manuscript. Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia, p. 11-12
Place of the Social Work Profession in an FSC
The SWP works in an FSC, a multidisciplinary environment, which recognises and values the respective expertise.
The SWP is respectful and works in collaboration with other professions. The SWP also recognises social work
values, knowledge and skills base, as well as sharing common values, knowledge and skills with other professional
groups. The SWP recognises and works with person-in-environment, while considering the psychosocial dynamics.
These dynamics require the SWP in their practice, to have professionally competent knowledge and skills, which
facilitate an understanding of and responsiveness to appropriate and effective practice.
Diagram 2: Appropriate and Effective Practice
Interaction
The Social between the Appropriate
individual and and Effective
Individual + Context + their social = Practice
context

Definition of Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice (FSC-CSWP)
The FSC-CSWP is defined as a document which indicates, through reference to social work theoretical, research
and practice knowledge and skills, the:
• Scope of social work practice in an FSC setting;
• Activities of social work practice in an FSC setting; and
• Indicators of social work practice in an FSC setting.
The FSC-CSWP is specific to social work practice within FSCs’ practice settings, although its contents share a
common base with social work in other organisational practice settings.
The FSC-CSWP is specifically referenced in relation to:
• FSC Service Model;
• Social work practice in FSCs; and
• Client groups of FSCs.

Frameworks of the FSC-CSWP
The FSC-CSWP provides a key medium through which professional social work practice in FSCs can be referenced,
guided and accountable to the clients, community and stakeholders.
1 The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework
To guide the SWPs on the scope of social work activities and the professional standards of social work
practice that is accountable to clients, community and stakeholders, the Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework
is developed. It is made up of:
a. Continuum of Practice
i. Risk and Complexity Classification
ii. Levels of Intervention Classification
b. Methods of Practice
i. Casework practice
ii. Group Work practice
iii. Community Work practice
a. Continuum of Practice
A Continuum of Practice is an approach to social work practice which recognises the varying types of
needs for different groups of clients such as individuals, families, groups and communities. The approach
acknowledges the heterogeneity and diversity of practice demands which would require different levels and
types of intervention depending on the characteristics presented by the individuals, families, groups and
communities.
The Continuum of Practice is made up of the Risk and Complexity Classification and Levels of Intervention
Classification.
Each part provides a means of representing the range of needs that social work effort must respond to within
an FSC. The FSC-CSWP describes the standards of practice SWPs are required to meet to respond to these
needs.
i. Risk and Complexity Classification
The Risk and Complexity Classification illustrates the interaction of risk to an individual’s safety and
the level of complexity of needs presented by an individual or family, which differentiates the levels of
intervention required for the individual or family
Understanding Risk:
Under the FSC-CSWP, risk is defined as “risk to individual’s safety” (e.g. risk of abuse and neglect; risk of
family violence; risk of suicide; risk of self-injury and risk of aggression etc). In this context, risk is defined in
relation to abuse or violence which are closely associated with the concept of ‘significant harm’ to self and
others. When making assessment on the risk presented by the families, the SWPs should focus on, but not
restricted to the following:
• Risk of harm towards or by the family members which include child abuse, spousal abuse, elder abuse
as well as vulnerable persons1 abuse;
• Risk of harm towards self which include suicide, self harm and extreme risk-taking behaviours; and
• Risk of harm towards or by the members of the community which include sexual aggression and
criminal behaviours.
1
Vulnerable persons are people who are at a greater than normal risk of abuse by reason of disability, age or illness; and are or may be unable
to protect themselves against harm or exploitation.

Understanding risk assessment
In the context of FSC-CSWP, risk assessment refers to an evaluation of the nature, likelihood, frequency,
duration, seriousness and imminence of a behaviour that leads to harm which is perceived by a professional
at a specific point of time. Risk tends to relate to vulnerability of a person, e.g. young children, victim of family
violence and abuse and persons with mental condition. Risk can also be related to both situation or person
that causes harm.
Understanding Complexity:
‘The defining characteristic of a complex system is that there are significant number of systems intertwining
and mingling each other through multiple, recursive, nonlinear feedback loops (Gilpin & Murphy, 2008).
Complexity is recognised as relating to two interrelated features of a practice situation, namely:
i. The number or extent of issues in three areas:

a. Instrumental aspect - everyday living e.g. employment, income, housing, education, medical
treatment
b. Social aspect - relationship with others within family, community
c. Personal aspect - relating to self-identity, self-worth and self-competency.
ii. The ‘degree’ or ‘depth’ of the issue in relation to either or both:

a. Acute presentation of problems at a heightened state
b. Chronic presentation of problems over an extended period of time
Given this nature, the multiple needs of such complex cases cannot be addressed by a single agency or
professional group (Crawford 2012; Davies & Ward 2012; Hood 2012a).
In addition, complex systems (cases) are characterised by non-linear relationships, i.e. a change in one
variable or set of variables, will be associated with disproportionate changes in another variable, or set of
variables. Change is also the usual feature of these complex cases.
Considering the interactions or behaviours of the components in these complex systems, they reflect ‘a
deeper level of patterned order’ and not random behaviours. As such, the interactions or behaviours cannot
be predicted simply by the rules of those underlying interactions but are the results of the interactions between
a large number of the relatively simple parts (Darley, 1994).
Based on the assessment on the level and interaction of risk and complexity, the individual or family the FSCs
serve can be classified into different FSC-CSWP Groups.
Table 1: FSC-CSWP Groups and Definitions
FSC-CSWP Groups Definition

Group 1 Normal Functioning
No risk; no complexity of needs
Group 2 Emerging Risks
Low risk; low complexity of needs
Group 3 Escalating Risks
Low risk; high complexity of needs
Group 4 Higher Risks
High risk; either low or high complexity of needs

The following diagram seeks to further the understanding on the types of risks and complexity of needs for clients
under FSC-CSWP Group 2 to 4:
Diagram 3: Risk and Complexity Classification for FSC-CSWP Group 2 to 4
Group 3
Low Risk and HIGH Group 4
High Risk and
High Complexity of Need High Complexity of Need
There are many aspects to the case either There are many aspects to the case either
within one aspect or across aspects within one aspect or across aspects
(instrumental, social, personal) which are (intrumental, social, personal) which are acute
C
acute and/or chronic but there are no or low and/or chronic and there are medium to high
risk to individual’s safety. o risk to individual’s safety.
m
p
l
LOW RISK
e
RISK
HIGH
x
Group 2 i Group 4
Low Risk and t High Risk and
Low Complexity of Need Low Complexity of Need
y
There are no or low risk to individual’s safety There are medium to high risk to individual’s
and the case is restricted to specific areas or safety however the case is restricted to
exhibit low chronic or acute states. specific areas or exhibit low chronic or acute
complexity issues.
LOW
ii. Levels of Intervention Classification
The three levels of social work intervention are differentiated by the focus of the intervention effort – whether
intervention is directed towards the whole of society, specific groups within society or towards specific
individuals and families in the society. For the purpose of FSC-CSWP, three levels of intervention are defined:
• Primary – developmental services for the Normal Functioning Group which contribute towards the
capacity-building of society and communities to enhance individual, family and social functioning to
prevent the rise of social problems and needs.
• Secondary – preventive services for the Emerging Risks Group, which help to build resilience and
focus on early intervention to address emerging risk factors that may undermine the functioning of
individuals and families and place these individuals and/or families at-risk of future problems.
• Tertiary – remedial services for Escalating Risks and Higher Risks Groups which focus on mitigating
risks that may undermine the safety of individuals and families.

The Continuum of Practice incorporates both the Risk and Complexity Classification and Levels of Intervention
Classification to assist SWPs to determine the appropriate level of intervention (i.e tertiary, secondary and primary)
in response to the risks and complexity of needs of clients in the respective FSC-CSWP Group classification. It is
shown in the diagram below:
Diagram 4: Continuum of Practice
Scope of Social Work Pratice in FSC
Primary Secondary Intervention Tertiary Intervention

Intervention Emerging Risks
Escalating Higher
Normal Risks Risks
Functioning
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4

Casework
Group Work
Community Work
The Continuum of Practice provides a means of distinguishing the client groups upon which the social work effort
within an FSC is focused on and delineates in a logical manner the range of service types and needs SWPs in an
FSC will respond to.
The social work effort in FSCs will focus on secondary and tertiary intervention for FSC-CSWP Group 2 to Group 4
clients.
b. Methods of Practice
Traditionally, a methods approach involving casework, goup work and community work were used in social
work practice (Perlman, 1957; Pincus & Minahan, 1973 [Casework]; Konopka, 1963 [Group Work]; Rothman,
Erlich, & Tropman, 2001 [Community Work]). Each method of practice is distinct in terms of the focus of
intervention effort, and the utilisation of this focus is the principal means of bringing about change.
• Casework refers to a method of social work intervention whereby a SWP works directly with individuals
and/or families and within their unique context and needs.
• Group Work refers to a method of social work intervention whereby a SWP utilises a group setting as
a medium to bring about changes in individuals and/or families. Through the use of Group Work, the
SWP facilitates group dynamics and provides opportunities for individual insight, problem solving,
behaviour management and relationship network support.
• Community Work refers to a method of social work intervention whereby a SWP utilises the community
setting as a medium to work with individuals and/or families. Community work have dual purposes.
Firstly, to enhance individual and family social network support connection. Secondly, to build capacity
in local communities to respond to the needs of individuals and families.

i. Casework Practice
In this approach, the key service characteristics of casework are utilised to assess and respond to the needs
of the case:
• Acknowledging individuals and/or families as key stakeholders and collaborators in the helping process;
• Focusing upon the individuals and/or families within the case context and how they perceive,
understand, feel about and respond to the problems and needs of the case situation;
• Referencing the individuals and/or families in relation to their social context and environment – the
individuals and/or families remain the focus of attention within the psychosocial milieu of the case, and
where required, paying attention to their close social relationships;
• Having vigilance towards the individuals and/or families in relation to their vulnerabilities and resilience,
their wider social environment and the possibility of harm to themselves or others;
• Utilising case assessment and intervention tools which provide an understanding of and responsiveness
to individuals’ and/or families’ needs and risks;
• Identifying and collating data around service gaps and barriers to inform stakeholders and facilitate the
development of social policies; and
• Working with the community in identifying and mobilising community resources for the individuals and/
or families.

Stages of Casework Practice
There are six stages of casework practice the SWPs undertake when responding to service needs. These are
irrespective of variations in the nature of client need, level of risk and complexity and focus of intervention.
The stages of Casework practice is presented diagrammatically below:

Diagram 5: Stages of Casework Practice
Stages of Casework Practice
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 5
Intake Assessment Case Planning Management of Review of Monitoring &

Case Plan Case Plan Closure
• Intake – the entry point of social work service. At this stage, the FSC determines whether the referral
can be appropriately matched to the resources and competencies available within the FSC.
• Assessment – assessing the nature, dynamics and risk of individual, family and community functioning,
which would inform the Case Planning for the clients.
• Case Planning – designing the plan for intervention.
• Management of Case Plan – operationalising the case plan to achieve the desired outcomes through
methods of practice, namely Casework, Group Work and Community Work.
• Review of Case Plan – reviewing and determining whether intervention outcomes of the case plan have
been achieved appropriately, effectively and efficiently.
• Monitoring – overseeing the maintenance of the gains as a result of intervention for a period, before the
closure of the case.
• Closure – terminating the case upon achieving sustainable service outcomes for individuals and
families.
ii. Group Work Practice
According to Toseland and Rivas (2012), group work practice consists of goal directed activity with small
treatment and task groups aimed at meeting socio-emotional needs and accomplishing tasks. The group
worker’s task is to engage in activities that facilitate the growth and development of the group and its members
during each developmental stage.
In tandem with the service context of the FSC that is predominantly targeted at the Emerging, Escalating
and Higher Risks Groups, Group Work is utilised as a strategic method of practice to respond to the needs
of the case. This is achieved through the individual Case Plan goals and mode of intervention, in which the
characteristics of the group can be used to provide opportunities for:
• social network and mutual aid
• social relationship;
• social feedback;
• social role models;
• social action; and
• social lab for transition/integration to real life situation.

There are different purposes in the various types of Group Work that can be undertaken to gain access to the
characteristics of the group for the growth and development of the group members (Toseland & Rivas, 2012).
• Purpose of Treatment Groups:
o Support Group – To help members cope with stressful life events and revitalise existing coping abilities;
o Therapy Group – To change behaviour; for correction, rehabilitation, coping, and problem solving
through behaviour change interventions;
o Education and Experiential Group – To educate through presentations, discussions and experiences;
o Growth Group – To develop members’ potential, awareness and insight; and
o Socialisation Group – To increase communication and social skills; to improve interpersonal relationships
through programme activities, structured exercises, role plays, etc.
• Purpose of Task Groups:
o To accomplish a goal that is neither intrinsically nor immediately linked to the needs of the members.
With specific reference to the scope of Group Work practice in FSCs, both existing clients and service users (i.e. not
known to the FSC under Casework) from predominantly the Emerging to Higher Risks groups can benefit from this
method of practice, utilising either of the following three types of Group Work:
i. Support group
ii. Therapeutic group
iii. Psycho-educational group

Characteristics of each of the three types of group are outlined in the table below:
Table 2: Types of Group Work in FSCs
Types of Group Work in FSCs

Characteristics
Therapeutic Support Psycho-educational
Purpose Help individuals better Help members cope with Educate members through
understand themselves so stressful life events and presentation and experiences
that they can make more revitalise existing coping
informed, healthy, and abilities Focus on developing
adaptive choices based members’ cognitive, affective
on a deeper awareness of and behavioural skills
their feelings, interpersonal
behaviours, reactions and
patterns
Leadership Leader as expert, authority Facilitator of empathic under- Leader as teacher and
figure or facilitator, depending standing and mutual aid provide for structure for
on approach group discussion
Focus • Focus on healing and • Focus on problems • Focus on imparting,
growth individuals are having discussing and integrating
• Focus on self awareness based on mutually shared factual information
and interpersonal difficulties, issues or life- • Help members through
relationship stage events skill building exercises
• Enhancing and • Focus on mutual aid and
discovering personal support amongst group
strengths members
• Exploration of new skills
and behaviour
• Experiencing transitional
life stage problems
Examples of • Family violence, self-harm • Coping as single mothers, • Themes and topics
types of issues • Examples of exclusion coping through grief based (e.g. financial
criteria: acute risks and management)
mental health issues
Group Work is formulated in the Case Plan as an intervention when the individual has been assessed to benefit from
the group and demonstrate capacity to:
• Recognise the presence and needs of others;

• Interact with and respond to others in a minimal socially appropriate manner; and
• Share a common sense of interest and linkage to the group purpose and medium of interaction.

iii. Community Work Practice
According to Vasoo, Tang and Ng (1983), Community Work is a conscious and planned method utilised by
SWP to focus on aspects which promote an individual’s wellbeing and encourage the interaction of individuals,
groups and organisation towards a concerted effort and action in a specified locality to achieve the specified
objectives. An important tenet of Community Work is the employment of community resources to address
social needs and to empower groups of people (Mendes, 2009).
Given this nature, Community Work has been adopted in varying extent across different countries and cultures.
As such, it is pertinent to scope Community Work in the context of FSCs in Singapore.
Being community-based social work agencies, it is vital for FSC to understand its place and role in the
community vis-à-vis other community partners for the common purpose of responding to the risks and needs
of the individuals, family and community. Before FSCs embark on any Community Work, it is of priority to
identify the key community partners for collaboration for twofold purpose: to avoid duplication of resources
and to leverage on existing local knowledge and expertise to meet a service gap and maximise the reach and
services to the community.
Given the versatility of Community Work, there are four key principles that FSCs will work within:
i. Collaboration – To work together, in partnership with relevant stakeholders in responding to issues,

risks, needs and identified issues in the community, to achieve common goals (Davies, 2000).
ii. Community integration – To enable the existing FSC clients to assimilate back into the community.
iii. Asset-building – To uncover the existing resources and strengths inherent within the community, and to
harness them for the betterment of the community (Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993).
iv. Empowerment2– To facilitate the people in the community to collectively identify issues, response to
risks and mobilise resources to meet their own needs.
Through Community Work, FSCs will serve two distinctive groups. The first group refers to clients, i.e. those
already known to the FSC and is currently receiving services from the FSCs. The use of Community Work
for clients is purposed through the Case Plan. The objectives of Community Work for clients, as formulated
through the Case Plan are:
• To promote more effective functioning of individuals and groups;
• To enhance the intervention gains made through Casework and/or Group Work through participation in
the community process and decision-making activities; and
• To stimulate and increase self-awareness and capacity to cope and improve life situations of clients
through mutual help and support in the community.
The second group refers to service users, i.e. those not already known to the FSCs but falls within the profile
group to which FSCs seeks to reach: communities presenting emerging risks, escalating risks or higher risks.
The objectives of Community Work developed for service users include:
• To respond to emerging social concerns and issues in the community within the purview of FSC;
• To advocate for the services users who are disadvantaged;
• To maximise the use of resources available, especially for the service users;
• To improve service delivery by developing ways of working with specific groups to maximise their level
of functioning and integrate them into the community; and
• To collaborate with various stakeholders and authorities to be more responsive to the community needs
and problems.
2
Empower is the “process of increasing personal, interpersonal, or political power so that individuals can take action to improve their life
situations”. (Gutierrez, 2001)

The objectives of Community Work utilised for each of these two groups have to be distinguished and clearly
articulated so as ensure clarity and optimal use of resources for planning and execution of Community Work.
The following framework comprising of strategies, methods and activities aims to provide better clarity and
understanding to Community Work in FSCs. At the apex, strategy refers to the overarching plan in conducting
Community Work. It is singular and focused in nature. Moving downwards to broader terms, methods will be
deployed as means to carry out the strategy. Similarly, activities have to be identified. As illustrated by the expanding
base downwards, several activities can be utilised under each method, and several methods may be deployed to
achieve the stated strategy.
Diagram 6: Framework for Community Work in FSCs
Strategy
METHODS
ACTIVITIES
Following are the four broad strategies identified for Community Work in FSCs:
i. Harnessing Community Resources – To identify and utilise formal, informal and potential resources in the
community that can meet the needs or address local concerns.
ii. Networking – To identify key community partners and create platforms for communication and collaboration
to attend to service needs and gaps on social issues in the community.
iii. Outreach – To reach out to the vulnerable and at-risk individuals and families in the community through a
concerted and intentional effort; to raise awareness of services available in the FSC and provide assistance
when necessary.
iv. Advocacy – To address service needs and/or gaps and emerging social issues in the community through a
process of appropriate and respectful engagement with the relevant authorities, leading to positive social
change.

Methods may include, but not limited to the following:
• Needs Assessment
• Community Resource Mapping
• Community Mobilisation
• Public Education (to raise awareness)
• Community Engagement
• Creating Partnerships
• Community Forum
• Stakeholder Engagement
• Submission of Proposals (to other stakeholders)
Examples of the specific activities are:

• Community Walk
• Block Survey
• Needs Assessment Survey
• Roadshows
• Block Party
• Food Distribution
• Soccer Outreach
• Focus Group Discussions
• Service Directory
• Networking Meeting
• Community Hall Meeting
Besides SWPs, FSCs can also consider aspects of Community Work to be undertaken by non-SWPs, such as the
non-SWPs in the FSCs or volunteers recruited by the FSCs.
Community Work practice can work closely with Group Work practice as it utilises the medium of the group to
undertake Community Work. It is therefore important to assess the individual’s capacity to operate and work within
the group context prior to undertaking Community Work with the individual.
Given the focus of social work practice in FSCs upon clients from the Emerging Risks Group to the Higher Risks
Group, the majority of cases will be managed through an integrated practice after an assessment of the suitable
modality. In this integrated practice, Casework is the initial and central method of intervention whilst Group Work
and Community Work are thereafter utilised intentionally to respond to the needs of clients, as formulated through
the Case Plan.

IV. Integrated practice of casework, group work and community work
Integrated practice refers to the utilising and integration of different practice modalities from casework to group
work and community work in order to ensure that intervention and service responses are better matched to
the needs of the individual and/or family at that point in time. Additionally, integrating multiple methods of
practice also helps to alleviate clients and/or families ‘drifting’ in casework for unnecessary periods of time
due to the lack of other more suitable modalities that they can be transited to.
Diagram 7: Continuum of Integration
Current State Future State
Group work Group work

Casework Group Casework Group
Wwork Wwork
Community
Community Casework Community Community
Casework work
work work work
Discrete Coordination Collaboration Integration

2 Framework Summary
The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework enables the social work effort within an FSC to:
• Identify the type of risk and complexity status in relation to the Levels of Intervention Classification;
• Determine where on the Continuum of Practice FSC SWPs may appropriately and strategically direct
intervention and utilise social work practice competencies efficiently;
• Match the methods of practice required to respond appropriately to the risk and complexity at the point
of intervention while recognising that the complexity and risk of a case can escalate or de-escalate;
• Be an integrated practice whereby the methods of intervention are utilised in a logical manner to
address the needs of the case and to facilitate the sustainable outcomes.
The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework can be illustrated in the diagram below:
Diagram 8: Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework
Scope of Social Work Pratice in FSC
Primary Secondary Intervention Tertiary Intervention

Intervention Emerging Risks
Escalating Higher
Normal Risks Risks
Functioning
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4

Casework
Group Work
Community Work

The diagram below illustrates how the above Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework can be translated to the processes
in the social work practice in FSCs:
Diagram 9: Processes through the Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework
FSC-CSWP
Intake Assessment
Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Group
Work
Group 2 Group 3 Group 4

Case Plan Case Plan Case Plan
Community
Work
Review
Closure

Family Service Centre Code of
Social Work Practice
1 Functions of the FSC-CSWP
The FSC-CSWP has seven functions. These are:
1 Provides a referent position of what constitutes FSCs’ social work practice;
2 Provides a means of enabling key stakeholders to identify the characteristics of social work practice
within an FSC;
3 Provides a framework for practice audits to enable accountability for social work practice in an FSC;
4 Provides referent benchmarks for the development of standardisation of FSC social work practice in
Singapore;
5 Provides guidance for FSCs on how to plan for and implement social work services and practice;
6 Provides a means to identify and develop professional competency standards required to comply with
the FSC-CSWP; and
7 Informs recruitment and selection of staff for FSC practice.
2 Application of the FSC-CSWP
The FSC-CSWP applies to the following groups of SWPs:
• Individuals with social work qualifications and hold social work designation in an FSC. They include the
Social Workers and Senior Social Workers.
• Individuals with social work qualifications and hold a non-social work designation in a FSC. They
include the Centre Managers and Executive Directors.
• Individuals without social work qualifications, hold a non-social work designation and undertake social
work practice, such as Counsellors, Programme Assistants, Programme Coordinators and Social Work
Associates.
Relating the FSC-CSWP to the FSC Service Model, it may be illustrated by the diagram below:
Diagram 10: FSC-CSWP in relation to the FSC Service Model
FSC Service FSC-CSWP

Model
Info and Referral Intake Assessment
Fsc Service
Governance Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Group
Work
Stakeholder and
Volunteer Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Management Case Plan Case Plan Case Plan
Community
Other supporting Work
structures Review
e.g.
Administration,
Human Resource Closure

3 Integration with Code of Professional Ethics
The FSC-CSWP is an important, though not exclusive component of professional practice. The FSC-CSWP
works in conjunction with the Singapore Association of Social Workers (SASW) Code of Professional Ethics
(Refer to Appendix A).
4 Guiding Principles of the FSC-CSWP for SWPs
The FSC-CSWP is based upon two groups of principles:
i. Principles relating to who SWPs work with; and

ii. Principles relating to how SWPs work.
The SASW Code of Professional Ethics (2004) and the IFSW Code of Ethics (2012) inform the principles:
i. Principles relating to who SWPs work with
Principle 1
• Uniqueness of each person – respect and regard for each person irrespective of nationality,
ethnicity, gender, age, beliefs or socio-economic status.
Principle 2
• Those most disadvantaged and vulnerable and at escalating and significant risk of harm to
themselves and/or others require:
o Social work professional values, knowledge and skills; and
o Social Workers who can demonstrate the practice application of professional values,
knowledge and skills with excellent practice standards.
ii. Principles relating to how SWPs work
Principle 1
• Self determination – each individual has the right to shape and determine their own lives provided
there is no risk to themselves or others.
Principle 2
• Social justice – all within society have the right to share the resources and capacities of the
society. SWPs have a particular, though not exclusive responsibility to work with those most
disadvantaged and most at risk of harm.
Principle 3
• Extends compassion and empathy – responsiveness to human distress and need – in a manner
which promotes and supports individual, family and community independence and resilience.
Principle 4
• Facilitates resilience – identifying and building upon capacity within individuals, families and
communities.

Principle 5
• Be attentive to vulnerability and risk – vigilance in identifying and monitoring vulnerabilities,

particularly those which may increase risk of harm.
Principle 6
• Social inclusion – reduces exclusion due to social disadvantage and marginalisation, through
facilitating opportunities for social valuing, respect and engagement.
Principle 7
• Equity of access – professional social work services are provided to those in need.
Principle 8
• Maintains privacy – holding information relating to individuals, families and communities unless
required for the provision of service (conditional confidentiality3).
Principle 9
• Social partnerships – works in service partnerships with clients, other services and communities
to empower individuals, families and communities.
Principle 10
• Professional competency – provides service at a best practice professional standard.
5 Structure of the FSC-CSWP Practice Domains
The FSC-CSWP is divided into four practice domains:
• Domain 1: Working with Individuals, Families and Communities in a Professional Manner
• Domain 2: Working in an Ethical Manner
• Domain 3: Working in an Organisational Setting
• Domain 4: Working with Reflective Practice
Each domain consists of the following:
• Description of domain
• Description of sub-domain
• Scope of sub-domain
• Objectives of sub-domain
• Standards of sub-domain
• Indicators of standards
3
Confidentiality is a principle of ethics according to which the social work practitioners or other professionals may not disclose information
about a client without the client’s consent. This information includes the identity of the clients, content of overt verbalisations, professional
opinions about the client and material from case records.
In very specific circumstances, social work practitioners and other professionals may be compelled by law or relevant stakeholders to reveal
to designated authorities some information (such as threats of violence, commission of crimes, suspected child abuse, and other client
behaviors) that would be relevant to legal judgments and of harm to clients and others.

Table 3: Overview of the Structure of the Practice Domains of FSC-CSWP
Domain 1: Working with Individuals, Families and Communities in a Professional Manner

Sub-domain Standards Indicators
Sub-domain 1a Standard 1 8 indicators
Standard 2 6 indicators
Sub-domain 1b Standard 6 5 indicators
Standard 13 1 indicator
Domain 2: Working in an Ethical Manner
Sub-domain 2 Standard 14 4 indicators
Domain 3: Working in an Organisational Setting
Sub-domain 3a Standard 19 9 indicators
Sub-domain 3b Standard 20 4 indicators
Sub-domain 3c Standard 21 6 indicators
Domain 4: Working with Reflective Practice
Sub-domain 4a Standard 22 4 Indicators
Sub-domain 4b Standard 23 3 Indicators
Sub-domain 4c Standard 24 3 Indicators
10 Sub-domains 24 Standards 103 Indicators

Practice Domains of the FSC-CSWP
SWPs are responsible for utilising the professional values, knowledge and skills base of the social work profession
to provide best-practice services in response to clients’ risks and needs.
The provision of quality professional services represents the commitment of the FSC to their clients. The SWP works
in partnership, where appropriate with agency colleagues, as well as government and stakeholders to support and
develop client’s self-reliance and resilience.
1 Domain 1: Working with Individuals, Families and Communities in a Professional Manner
Social work practice seeks to respond to the needs and risks of people within an FSC service boundary and,
where appropriate, beyond the service boundary. This response seeks to reduce risks and vulnerabilities,
whilst enhancing self-reliance and resilience capacities, including resources and competencies, of individuals,
families, communities and, where relevant, the wider society.
Sub-domain 1a
Level of Intervention: Secondary and Tertiary
Method of Practice: Casework
Scope
Applicable to clients in the Emerging, Escalating and Higher Risks Groups.
Objectives
1. To reduce risks and needs of clients by addressing factors which generate risks and
vulnerabilities.
2. To reduce risks and needs of clients by working with stakeholders.
3. To enhance clients’ self-reliance and build clients’ resilience.
4. To utilise social work professional competency and expertise in an appropriate, effective and
efficient manner.
STANDARDS INDICATORS
Standard 1 Indicator 1: Case Intake
Undertake
intervention 1. The SWP obtains appropriate intake information with standard intake forms
through application which include:
of a logical a. Client demographic information;
sequence of b. Immediate issues of concern;
practice tasks c. Service required; and
d. Present, past and future risk issues, if any.
2. The SWP undertakes an intake assessment on the presenting issues of

concerns and level of risk to ascertain the follow-up actions required:
a. If there are risk issues to be addressed immediately, to consult the
Supervisor for decision to escalate the case to relevant authorities;
b. If the presenting issues match the resources and competencies
available at the agency, to continue with case intervention within the
agency;
c. If the presenting issues do not match the agency’s resources and
competencies, to refer the case to other appropriate agencies; and
d. To close the intake if there is no follow up action required by the
agency.

Standard 1 Indicator 2: Organising Information
Undertake
intervention The SWP uses the following to organise information:
through application a. Genogram;
of a logical b. Timeline, which may include issues and themes impacting the case; and
sequence of c. Ecomap of key people and systems.
practice tasks
Indicator 3: Case Assessment
1. The SWP also undertakes the following assessments:

a. Bio-psycho-social-spiritual assessment;
b. Risk assessment;
c. Family functioning assessment;
d. Aggression and violence assessment, when applicable; and
e. Vulnerable persons needs assessment, when applicable.
2. Based on the assessment, prioritisation of the key need areas are identified.
Indicator 4: Case Planning
1. The SWP develops a Case Plan which includes:

a. Identified concerns;
b. Conceptualisation of the case;
c. Goals of intervention; and
d. Methods of intervention.
2. The SWP then develops a Case Management Plan which includes:

a. Tasks to be undertaken to implement the Case Plan;
b. Roles involved to carry out the tasks; and
c. Timeframe for tasks’ completion.
Indicator 5: Management of Case Plan
1. The SWP executes the Case Management Plan, which includes but not
limited to the following:
a. Regular follow-up with clients and monitor progress;
b. Regular networking, such as case conferences with partners on pro-
gress of clients and their intervention, if any;
c. Completion of the relevant and necessary documentation, such as
case notes and social reports; and
d. Adequate and appropriate internal or external transfer of cases, if re-
quired.
2. The SWP makes relevant and necessary adjustment to the Case Management
Plan to respond to the changes in the circumstances of individuals and/or
family, which includes managing any additional risks or needs which may
emerge during intervention.

Indicator 6: Case Review
1. The SWP conducts a Case Review, either at the scheduled period or when
there are major changes to the circumstances of the individual and/or family,
which includes but not limited to the following:
a. Conducts a re-assessment based on the current circumstances on the
risks and needs of the individual and/or family;
b. Determines whether the goals of intervention have been appropriately,
effectively and efficiently achieved;
c. Determines whether the Case Management Plan has been completed;
d. Identifies factors that affect the outcomes; and
e. Makes recommendation, on either of the following:
• New Case Plan and/or Case Management Plan; or
• Case Plan and/or Case Management Plan to be maintained; or
• Proceed to Case Monitoring; or
• Proceed to Case Closure.
3. The SWP works closely with their Supervisor for Case Review. For cases
with high complexities and risks, the review may involve feedback from
external professionals.
Indicator 7: Case Monitoring
The SWP monitors the case prior to the closure to ensure case outcomes are sus-
tained over a period of time, and up to six months, with attention to:
a. Monitoring professional partnerships;
b. Monitoring responsibilities;
c. Reporting feedback;
d. Sustainability of case outcomes;
e. Potential emerging risks and vulnerabilities; and
f. Identified strengths to sustain intervention gains.
Indicator 8: Case Closure
The SWP closes the case when:

a. Goals are met;
b. Case outcomes are sustained;
c. Risks and needs are reduced and/or managed; and
d. Functioning capacity of the individual and/or family is enhanced.
Standard 2 Indicator 1: Engaging Client

Establish an
engaged and The SWP utilises key professional interpersonal skills to engage the client:
empathic • Listening
professional • Empathising
therapeutic • Reflecting
relationship • Summarising
and partnership • Questioning
between the SWP • Challenging
and the client
Indicator 2: Professional Respect
The SWP conveys professional respectfulness and mutuality in the conduct of the
practice relationship with the client.
Indicator 3: Sensitvity
The SWP is sensitive to appropriate interpersonal communication values, protocols

and best practices in relation to gender, age, cultural and religious differences.

Indicator 4: Attentiveness
The SWP is attentive to the communication needs of the family as a system of

concern, whilst being respectful and responsive to recognising and working with
differences between family members and differences in the prioritisation of service
need.
Indicator 5: Education and Empowerment
The SWP provides relevant information relating to the client’s concerns and needs
to facilitate service response and to educate and empower the client.
Indicator 6: Bridging Language Differences
The SWP accesses translation services where language differences exist with
clients.
Standard 3 Indicator 1: Practice Application
Utilise professional
practice The SWP knows and understands the practice application of the generic
experience, knowledge base of professional social work practice in relation to:
knowledge, • Human development
theories and • Care needs of vulnerable persons
research to • Abuse, neglect and trauma of vulnerable persons
logically inform • Family assessment
and guide practice • Risk, risk assessment and risk management
thinking • Group formation, dynamics and intervention
• Community formation, support and management
• Health and mental health
• Social analysis and social policy
• Practice theories
• Organisational theories and organisational operation
• Research methods and knowledge
• Counselling skills and strategies
Indicator 2: Articulation of Practice
The SWP articulates practice thinking and reasoning in a professional, logical,

theoretically informed and respectful manner, in both written and oral forms.
These include, but not restricted to:
• Social report
• Review report
• Progress report
• Case referral
• Case conference
• Case discussion
• Case presentation
Indicator 3: Professional Development
The SWP undertakes professional development to acquire and understand new

theoretical, research and practice knowledge relevant to practice.
Indicator 4: Professional Knowledge
The SWP considers a range of theoretical, research and practice knowledge

relevant to social work practice and needs of each case.

Standard 4 Indicator 1:Facilitating Participation
Collaborate with
clients in service The SWP facilitates appropriate information transparency and honesty (where no
understanding and risk is assessed to be present) and client participation in case understanding and
response decision making.
Indicator 2: Conveying Expected Behaviour
The SWP conveys to the client and other key stakeholders the expected
behaviours stipulated by social policies and legislations.
Indicator 3: Empowering Clients
The SWP works with the client in an empowering manner, which recognises and
values client competencies, strengths and demonstrated resilience capacities.
Indicator 4: Managing Conflict
The SWP manages conflict with the client in relation to perception and
understanding of case concerns and direction, and responds with clarity the
service purpose and responsibility in relation to agency function, social policies
and legislations.
Indicator 5: Supporting Self-Advocacy
The SWP supports and encourages client self-advocacy to access resources to

meet client’s goals.
Standard 5 Indicator 1: Professionalism
Work with
professionals from The SWP values, respects and professionally articulates and demonstrates
multidisciplines to professionalism in all contacts.
understand and
respond to service Indicator 2: Professional Relationships
needs and manage
risks The SWP develops professional relationships and networks to facilitate the
provision of services for clients.
Indicator 3: Professional Partnerships
The SWP identifies relevant professional partnerships and advocates for service
access.
Indicator 4: Team Work
The SWP works in a team with other professionals and supports their practice
activities to provide timely and professional response to meet client’s needs.
Indicator 5: Service Gaps
The SWP identifies service gaps in response to client’s needs and advocates for
the provision of service development and provision in a professional and respectful
manner.

Sub-domain 1b
Method of Practice: Group Work
Scope
Applicable to clients and/or service users in the Emerging, Escalating and Higher Risks Groups; and
only when needs of client and/or service users has been clearly established.
Objectives
1. To support the development of Group Work to enhance capacity of the clients and/or service
users.
2. To identify common needs faced by the Emerging Risks to Higher Risks Groups and develop
Group Work to address vulnerabilities and/or increase resilience capacities.
Standard 6 Indicator 1: Ethical Consideration
Undertake Group
Work practice The SWP considers ethical aspects and contracts with client before utilising
to respond to Group Work.
the needs of Indicator 2: Assessment of Client’s Capacity
clients who are
of Emerging, The SWP, in consultation with client and where applicable, with other professionals,
Escalating and assesses client’s capacity to participate in Group Work by conducting eligibility
screening.
Higher Risks
Groups Indicator 3: Identification of Type of Group Work
The SWP identifies the type of Group Work suitable to be used as an integrated
intervention strategy with Casework to meet the needs of clients.
Indicator 4: Taps on Existing Group Work
The SWP does environment scan, identifies and taps on existing Group Work for
the clients.
Indicator 5: Professional Partnerships
The SWP works, where applicable, with professionals in agency and/or partners to
facilitate the development of new Group Work to meet the needs of clients.
Standard 7 Indicator 1: Awareness of Service Needs and Gaps
Undertake Group
Work practice to The SWP works with relevant stakeholders to be aware of the needs and gaps in
respond to groups resource provision to an identified population within these groups.
with emerging and Indicator 2: Ethical Consideration
escalating risks in
the community The SWP considers ethical aspects and contracts with service users before
utilising Group Work.
Indicator 3: Assessment of Service User’s Capacity
The SWP, in consultation with service users and where applicable, with other
professionals, assesses service user’s capacity to participate in Group Work by
conducting eligibility screening.
Indicator 4: Identification of Type of Group Work
The SWP identifies the type of Group Work suitable to meet the needs of service
users.
Indicator 5: Taps on Existing Group Work
The SWP taps on existing Group Work or facilitates the development of new
Group Work to meet gaps in services to the individuals and families.
Indicator 6: Follow up on Service User’s Needs
The SWP assesses service users’ needs for case work services and makes
referrals when necessary.

Standard 8 Indicator 1: Group Work Competencies
practice The SWP knows, understands and demonstrates application of the group work
experience, competencies comprising of, but not restricted to:
knowledge, • Group facilitation
theories and • Group behaviour and dynamics
research to • Problem-solving processes in groups
logically inform and • Conflict resolution in groups
guide Group Work • Understanding of diversity
• Culture sensitivity
• Therapeutic factors for group to be effective
• Theories that inform group work practice
Indicator 2: Articulation of Practice
The SWP articulates practice thinking and reasoning in a professional, logical,

theoretically informed and respectful manner during supervision, to stakeholders
and clients and/or service users.
The SWP undertakes professional development to acquire and keep abreast of

new theoretical, research and practice knowledge relevant to Group Work.
Indicator 4: Professional Knowledge
The SWP considers a range of theoretical, research and practice knowledge

relevant to Group Work.
Standard 9 Indicator 1: Evaluation
Undertake
evaluation of The SWP develops an evaluation process to assess the effectiveness of Group
Group Work Work and taking into consideration that from the relevant partners, if any.
Indicator 2: Evaluation Follow-up
The SWP provides community partners, referring partners and funders with
evaluation report of client and/or service user’s progress and possible follow
up.
Indicator 3: Relevance of Group Work
The SWP undertakes periodic evaluation of Group Work to ensure its relevance
in meeting needs of clients and/or service users.
Sub-domain 1c
Method of Practice: Community Work
Scope
Applicable to clients and/or service users in the Emerging, Escalating and Higher Risks Groups.
Principles
1. To work together, in partnership with relevant stakeholders in responding to issues, risks,
needs and identified issues in the community, to achieve common goals (collaboration).
2. To enable the existing FSC clients to assimilate back into the community (community
integration).
3. To uncover the existing resources and strengths inherent within the community, and to harness
them for the betterment of the community (asset-building).
4. To facilitate the people in the community to collectively identify issues, response to risks and
mobilise resources to meet their own needs (empowerment).

Standard 10 Indicator 1: Identification of Gaps and Needs
Undertake
Community Work The SWP works with the relevant community partners to identify gaps or
to respond to the changes needed in the provision of social services to the clients.
needs of clients Indicator 2: Taps on Existing Resources
The SWP taps on the existing resources and programmes to respond to the
needs of clients.
Indicator 3: Community Partnership
The SWP works with the relevant community partners to facilitate the provision
and development of relevant community programmes to build capacity of the
clients.
Standard 11 Indicator 1: Identification of Gaps and Needs
Undertake
Community The SWP works with other relevant community partners to highlight the gaps in
Work practice for resource provision to the service users.
service users, who Indicator 2: Community Partnership
presents emerging,
escalating and The SWP works with other relevant community partners to discuss policy
higher risks implications and increase resource allocation to the service users.
Standard 12 Indicator 1: Professional Knowledge
practice The SWP considers a range of theoretical, research and practice knowledge
experience, relevant to Community Work.
knowledge, Indicator 2: Practice Application
theories and
research to The SWP knows and understands the practice application of related knowledge
logically inform and base comprising of, but not restricted to:
guide Community • Asset-based community development theory
Work • Empowerment theory
• Ecological model
• Strengths perspective
The SWP keeps abreast on new trends and social development in the local
community as well as social and economic development at the national level both
present and future.
Standard 13 Indicator 1: Evaluation
Undertake
evaluation of The SWP works with the relevant community partners to monitor and evaluate the
Community Work effectiveness of the developed Community Work to ensure that they are meeting the
needs of the clients and remain relevant to changing needs.

2 Domain 2: Working in an Ethical Manner
Social work practice in an FSC is informed and guided by the humanistic values of respect for the individual,
self-determination and social justice. SWPs in FSCs have a professional responsibility to conduct their
professional practice with reference to professional ethical standards of social work.
Sub-domain 2
SWP practises according to the ethical guidelines of the SASW.
Scope
Unconditionally applicable to all clients, colleagues and stakeholders.
Objectives
1. To believe in the value and dignity of individuals and to interact with them in a respectful
manner and maintain the right of self-determination.
2. To demonstrate a commitment to social justice.
3. To uphold the integrity of social work practice.
Standard 14 Indicator 1: Ethical Guidelines
Practise with
reference to the The SWP has knowledge of ethical guidelines and relevant codes of conduct and
SASW Code of an understanding of how the ethical guidelines and codes of conduct are applied to
Professional Ethics professional practice
Indicator 2: Reflective Practice
The SWP is observant and reflective of practice to monitor and review the
congruence of practice with ethical guidelines and codes of conduct.
Indicator 3: Commitment to Ethical Practice
The SWP is committed to reflect on own ethical practice based on feedback from
colleagues and stakeholders.
Indicator 4: Breach of Code
The SWP reports breaches of ethics or conduct to relevant authorities or the

police when there are concerns relating to criminal matters.
Standard 15 Indicator 1: Embracing Diversity
Commit to
respecting The SWP demonstrates knowledge and understanding of social diversity within
diversity and social society.
integration within Indicator 2: Sensitive Practice
society
The SWP is sensitive in their practice to social diversity within society.
Indicator 3: Social Reponsibilities
The SWP references practice to social responsibilities of society.

Indicator 4: Enhancing Social Integration
The SWP works with the strengths and challenges of diverse groups and
enhances social integration within society.

Standard 16 Indicator 1: Protecting Rights
Attend and
respond to the The SWP is guided by a commitment to protect the rights of others which
disadvantaged complies with Singapore Laws and the relevant United Nations Conventions.
and those facing Indicator 2: Social Justice
injustice within
society The SWP is aware of the factors generating disadvantages and injustice within
society and promotes awareness of and responses to these factors.
Indicator 3: Facilitating Access
The SWP facilitates access to social resources which addresses the

disadvantage and injustice within society.
Standard 17 Indicator 1: Care and Protection
Attend and
respond to the The SWP at all times places the care, safety and protection of vulnerable
care, safety and persons as a priority of service responsibility.
protection of Indicator 2: Empowerment and Support
vulnerable persons
The SWP works to empower and support families to meet the care needs of
vulnerable persons.
Indicator 3: Work in Partnership
The SWP works in partnership with relevant stakeholders to manage risks.

Indicator 4: Risk Assessment
The SWP has professional knowledge and skills to undertake a risk

assessment and notify appropriate authorities when there are concerns or
allegations relating to vulnerable persons’ safety.
Standard 17 Indicator 1: Information Sharing
Maintain
conditional The SWP only acquires and shares information which is pertinent to and
confidentiality facilitates service response.
in the exchange Indicator 2: Information Gathering
of information
relating to clients, The SWP obtains information in a respectful manner and minimises intrusion
colleagues and into privacy.
stakeholders
Indicator 3: Informing Client
The SWP, where appropriate, informs the client to whom the information will be
shared with and the reasons for sharing.
Indicator 4: Conditional Confidentiality
The SWP maintains conditional confidentiality and respects client’s refusal to give
consent for the sharing of information.

3 Domain 3: Working in an Organisational Setting
The organisational setting provides the operational structure and context for professional social work practice.
SWPs have an organisational responsibility to meet organisational requirements and work with other areas of
organisational response, in an integrated manner to provide a holistic service to clients. There is a commitment
to avoid case practice isolation in the management of case practice responsibilities.
Sub-domain 3a
SWP meets organisational requirements of the social work role.
Scope
Enactment of the role responsibilities of the SWP in accordance with organisational policies, protocols
and procedures.
Objectives
1. To contribute to the achievement of the organisational mission.
2. To provide quality professional social work services on behalf of the organisation.
3. To facilitate the use of organisational capacity to provide appropriate and effective professional
services.
4. To maintain and contribute to the professional social work perspective on practice and
organisational responsiveness functioning.
Standard 19 Indicator 1: Organisational Policies
Establish and
maintain a The SWP has knowledge and understanding of organisation’s policies,
professional social protocols and procedures and contributes to the achievement of the
work role within organisational mission.
the organisation Indicator 2: Social Work Values
consistent with
social work values, The SWP utilises social work values, knowledge and skills to work in a
knowledge and professionally accountable manner within the designated organisational role.
skills Indicator 3: Professionalism
The SWP engages with, learns from and follows directive from Supervisors
and Management in a professional manner to ensure professional services are
delivered.
Indicator 4: Separation of Professional and Personal Concerns
The SWP separates professional concerns from personal concerns when

providing professional services.
Indicator 5: Workload Management
The SWP manages their workload to meet organisational deadlines.

Indicator 6: Documentation
The SWP complies with organisational requirements for record keeping,

documentation and data collection.
Indicator 7: Responsible Use of Resources
The SWP ensures that resources are utilised in a responsible manner for the
intended professional purpose.
Indicator 8: Respect
The SWP values and respects the social work professional role within the
organisation. When organisational role requirements and social work professional
role are in conflict, the SWP will seek to address it with the relevant authorities.
Indicator 9: Professional Representation
The SWP represents the organisation in a professional manner which enhances

the professional standing and community profile of the organisation.

Sub-domain 3b
SWP works with other professionals within the organisation.
Scope
Collaboration with other professionals within the organisation.
Objectives
1. To integrate professional service provision to effectively respond to clients’ needs.
2. To enrich professional service provision by working with multidisciplinary professionals.
Standard 20 Indicator 1: Multi-Disciplinary Work
Perform the social
work role as part of The SWP works with other service systems within the organisation to contribute
a multidisciplinary to the achievement of the organisational mission.
team Indicator 2: Teamwork and Communication
The SWP demonstrates effective teamwork and communication to achieve the

organisational mission.
Indicator 3: Professional Support
The SWP contributes to the provision of ongoing professional support to staff

within the organisation.
Indicator 4: Networking
The SWP represents the organisation to network with other stakeholders to

access appropriate resources for service delivery.
Sub-domain 3c
SWP undertakes managerial responsibilities as a manager within an organisation (only applicable for
identified staff).
Scope
Enactment of the managerial responsibilities of the SWP within the organisation.
Objective
To maintain and contribute a professional social work perspective on operational management within
the organisation.

Standard 21 Indicator 1: Knowledge and Understanding
Undertake the
management role The SWP develops a knowledge and understanding of the management role
utilising social from a social work perspective.
work values, Indicator 2: Clarity of Purpose and Roles
knowledge and
skills The SWP develops clarity of social work domain, purpose, roles and activities
within the management role in the organisation.
Indicator 3: Professional Service Delivery
The SWP contributes to the development of operational procedures and

systems to ensure professional service delivery.
Indicator 4: Staff Performance and Organisational Mission
The SWP contributes to the recruitment, support, mentoring, supervision and

monitoring of social work and non-social work staff in relation to staff performance
and the achievement of the organisational mission.
Indicator 5: Organisational Strategic Planning
The SWP contributes to the development of organisational strategic planning

through the input of social work values, knowledge and skills.
Indicator 6: Advocacy for the Profession
The SWP advocates for the role of social work profession within the
organisation.
4 Domain 4: Working with Reflective Practice
Social work practice is enhanced by the commitment to reflect upon the what, why and how the practice was
undertaken, and the outcomes achieved through this. Reflective practice contributes to the development of
social work understanding, knowledge and skills.
Sub-domain 4a
SWP undertakes self-reflective practice.
Scope
All areas of social work practice which the SWP has a responsibility to reflect upon.
Objectives
1. To commit to openness and continuous self learning.
2. To review, reflect upon and learn other practice contexts, functions, processes and outcomes.
3. To apply learning to future practice.

Standard 22 Indicator 1: Regular Reflection
Undertake
reflective practice The SWP reflects regularly upon key aspects of their practice.
as an integral part Indicator 2: Utilising Knowledge
to professional
social work The SWP utilises practice wisdom4, theoretical and research knowledge to
practice facilitate their reflection process.
Indicator 3: Applying Learning
The SWP learns from reflective practice and applies learning to their future
practice.
Indicator 4: Reflective Dialogue
The SWP engages in reflective dialogue with clients, colleagues, supervisors

and stakeholders to share their practice reflection and gather feedback to enhance
reflective practice.
Sub-domain 4b
SWP undergoes clinical and professional supervision.
Scope
All areas of practice which the SWP undertakes in relation to organisational practice, management and
policy development.
Objectives
1. To facilitate professional reflection in specific and future social work roles.
2. To facilitate the capacity to link theories to practice.
3. To enhance the SWP’s ability to utilise practice wisdom, theoretical and research knowledge to
guide and inform practice.
4 A term used to describe the accumulation of information, assumptions, ideologies and judgments that have seemed practically useful in
fulfilling the expectations of the job.

Sub-domain 4b
SWP undergoes clinical and professional supervision.
Scope
All areas of practice which the SWP undertakes in relation to organisational practice, management and
policy development.
Objectives
1. To facilitate professional reflection in specific and future social work roles.
2. To facilitate the capacity to link theories to practice.
3. To enhance the SWP’s ability to utilise practice wisdom, theoretical and research knowledge to
guide and inform practice.
Standard 23 Indicator 1: Clinical Supervision
Undergoes clinical
and professional The SWP obtains regular clinical and professional supervision.
supervision as an Indicator 2: Proactive Use of Supervision
important part of
reflective learning The SWP is proactive in utilising clinical and professional supervision for
and professional reflective learning, professional development and career planning.
development Indicator 3: Personal Responsibility
The SWP takes responsibility for and actively engages in self-care and the
supervision process to facilitate reflective learning and professional development.
Sub-domain 4c
SWP undertakes social work education
Scope
All areas of social work practice relating to current and future social work knowledge and skills need
acquisition.
Objectives
1. To establish and maintain the value of professional development learning.
2. To increase relevant and required competencies in social work practice.
3. To increase the postgraduate educational participation of SWPs.
4. To improve the professional status of the social work profession.
Standard 24 Indicator 1: Keeping Current
Remain abreast
with theoretical, The SWP keeps abreast with current social work and other professional
research discipline knowledge and skills development in practice areas relevant to present
and practice and future work.
knowledge Indicator 2: Utilising Knowledge
development
relating to their The SWP utilises professional knowledge learnt in practice.
areas of work Indicator 3: Further Studies and Accreditation
The SWP undertakes post-graduate and further studies, and strives for social
work related accreditations, where relevant and applicable.

REFERENCES
Crawford, K. (2012). Interprofessional Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London: Sage.
Davie, C. & Ward, H. (2012) Safeguarding Child across Services: Message from Research.
London: Jessica Kingsley.
Davies, M. (2000). The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Social Work. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gutierrez, L. (2001). Multicultural organizational development. Beyond racial divides:

Ethnicities in social work practice, 1, 43-58.
Hood, C., Rothstein, H. & Baldwin, R. (2000) The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk
Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henderson & Thomas. (2002). Skills in neighbourhood work (3rd Ed). New York:
Routledge.
International Federation of Social Workers. (2012). Statement of Ethical Principles. Retrieved

March 11, 2014, from http://ifsw.org/policies/statement-of-ethical-principles/
Konopka, G. (1963). Social groupwork: A helping process. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Kirst-Ashman & Hull. (2012). Generalist Practice with Organizations and

Communities (5th Ed). USA: Cengage Learning.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building Communities from the inside out: A path
toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston, Ill.: Center for Urban Affairs
and Policy Research, Northwestern University.
Meemeduma, P. (2002). Professionally Accountable Practice – A practice manual for logical

reasoning in practice. Unpublished manuscript, Edith Cowan University, Perth Western
Australia.
Mendes, P. (2009). Teaching community development to social work students: a critical

reflection. Community Development Journal, 44, 248-262.
Ministry of Social and Family Development, & National Council of Social Service. (2013). Family
Service Centre service model: As at Mar 2013. Singapore: Author.
National Social Work Competency Framework. (2015). Retrieved Oct 1, 2016, from http://
www.ssi.sg
Ministry of Health, Ministry of Social and Family Development and National Council of Social
Service. Singapore.
Perlman, H. (1957). Social casework: A problem solving process. Chicago: University Press.
Pincus, A., & Minahan, A. (1973). Social work practice: Model & method. Itasca, IL: Peacock
Publisher.
Rothman, J., Erlich, J., & Tropman, J. (2001). Strategies of community intervention: Macro
practice (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
Toseland, R. W., & Rivas, R. F. (2012). An introduction to group work practice (7th ed.). Boston,
MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Vasoo, S., Tang, W., & Ng, G. T. (1983). A manual on community work in Singapore. Singapore:
Singapore Council of Social Service.

APPENDIX A
SINGAPORE ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

PREAMBLE/GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The profession of social work is based upon a belief in the value and dignity of all human beings, and a concern for
their social well being.
Social work is dedicated to the enhancement of the lives of human beings through the provision and development
of appropriate services and through the promotion of social planning and action. Members of the profession have
sought through formal education to equip themselves to meet their responsibilities for
the welfare of society as a whole.
The social work profession accepts the responsibility to contribute its knowledge and skills, to lend support to
programmes of social welfare and endeavours to protect the community against unethical or incompetent practice
in the social welfare field, which may be harmfulto human welfare.
The Singapore Association of Social Workers (SASW) subscribes to the following basic principles and requires its
members to observe them.
PRINCIPLES OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
A. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY TO CLIENTS
1. Social workers avoid discrimination and prejudice, respect individual differences and accept that professional
responsibility must take precedence over personalaims and views.
2. Social workers respect and safeguard the rights of persons served in a relationship of mutual trust, to privacy
and confidentiality in their use of the service and to responsible use of all information given and received.
Responsible use entails the following:
a) Not discussing the case outside the professional context.
b) Restricting access on any records e.g. written, audio, video, e-mail on the client unless subpoenaed by
the Courts to do so.
c) Before making a video/audio recording, informed consent from the client must be sought in writing.
d) Before making a video/audio recording, social workers must make a written undertaking, in the presence
of the client, about restricted use of the recording which is:
(i) for use within the agency and for purposes benefiting the client
(ii) for relevant professionals and for training/consultation purposes

Permission must be sought in writing from the client again if the audio/video recording is to be used for public
viewing and/or hearing.
e) In the event that information relating to the client has to be shared with a professional and/or professional
body, the client’s permission has to be sought
f) In the event that the client is a minor or is unable for physical, mental or emotional reasons to give
consent, a responsible adult who plays a significant role in the life of the minor or adult client, needs to
be informed and have his/her consent sought.
g) Names and other sensitive personal particulars of the clients must be removed from the records when
used for training or other educational purposes. Pseudonyms and other altered particulars may be
substituted so as to maintain anonymity of the clients.
h) All records (e.g. written, audio, video and e-mail) must be kept strictly confidentialand in a safe place
away from public viewing accessible only to professionals involved in the case.
i) When destroying all forms of records deemed no longer active and useful, care must be taken by social
workers to ensure that the principles of confidentiality continue to be maintained, i.e. that the
records are completely destroyed leaving no evidence traceable to the identity of the clients.
Responsibility for protecting the clients’ rights continues even after termination of the professional relationship.
3. Social workers affirm the rights of persons served to make their own decisions and to work out their own
problems within the scope of their own resources, having due regard to their personal well-being.
4. Social workers affirm the right to client self determination which needs to be preceded by ensuring that the
client is both aware of and has assessed alternative options. The role of social workers in this instance is to
provide all relevant information that would allow the client to make an informed decision.
5. When social workers act on behalf of clients who lack the capacity to make an informed decision, social
workers take steps to safeguard the interests and rights of these clients.
6. Social workers limit the rights to self-determination where in the social worker’s professional judgment,clients’
actions or potential actions pose a serious, foreseeable and imminent risk to themselves and others.
7. Social workers affirm that every person has the right to avail themselves to social services, unless this
contravenes a specific policy of their employing agency. In practice, this means ensuring:
a) that the client will be able to communicate in a manner comfortable to him/her.
b) an atmosphere that respects all religions and cultures, race, and nationality regardless of political belief,
gender, gender orientation, age, marital status, mental and physical ability.
8. Social workers use clear and respectful language in all communications

(written and verbal) to and about clients.
9. Social workers take the responsibility for continuity of services for their own clients in the event that services are
disrupted by any circumstance (e.g. going on leave, emergencies, resignation or termination of employment)

10. Social workers do not, under any circumstance, engage in sexual activities or sexual contact with current
clients whether such contact is consensual or not. This principle applies also to:
a) Client’s relatives
b) Other individuals with whlom the client maintains a close personal relationship
c) Where there is a risk of exploitation or potential harm to the client.

11. Social workers do not provide clinical services to individuals with whom they have had a prior sexual
relationship.
12. Social workers do not get involved in close personal relationships with former clients unless the professional
relationship was ended at least two years prior to the new contact.
13. Social workers do not sexually harass clients. Sexual harassment includes sexual advances, sexual solicitation,
requests for sexual favours, and other verbal or physicalconduct of a sexual nature.
14. Social workers do not engage in physicalcontact with clients where there is a possibility of psychological
harm to the client as a result of the contact such as cradling or caressing clients.
B. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY TO COLLEAGUES INCLUDING INTER-DISCIPLINARY

COLLEAGUES
1. Social workers act on the recognition that effective service depends on cooperation among professional
disciplines and others with due regard to respective areas of competence.
2. Social workers treat with respect the professional judgment, statements and actions of colleagues. When
criticisms of these appear unwarranted, social workers need to refer the matter to the Association.
3. Social workers who refer clients to other professionals take steps to facilitate an orderly transfer of responsibility,
and to disclose all pertinent information to the new service providers, with clients’ consent.
4. When working or consulting with other professional disciplines, social workers are aware of the parameters
of their own power and expertise as well as that of other professionals, thereby maximizing effective working
relationships and ensuring that neither social workers nor clients have inappropriate or unrealistic expectations
of themselves and of the results of the help offered.
C. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY IN PRACTICE SETTINGS
1. Social workers are remunerated for their professional work, by a salary, fees, grants or other payments
allowable under the terms of their service and by no other gain connected with their working practice. This
means that social workers do not accept goods or services from clients as payment for professional services.
Bartering arrangements particularly involving services create the potential for conflict of interests, exploitation
and inappropriate boundaries in a social worker’s relationship with clients.

D. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY AS PROFESSIONALS AND TO THE SOCIAL WORK
PROFESSION
1. Social workers work for the continued development of professional competence for both themselves and the
profession. This includes their support of continuing professional education in its widest sense.
2. Social workers strive to remain proficient in professional practice and the performance of professional
functions by critically examining and keeping current with emerging knowledge relevant to social work,
reviewing regularly professional literature and participating in continuing education relevant to social work
practice and social work ethics.
3. Social workers provide services and represent themselves competent only within the boundaries of their
education, training, licence certification, consultation received, supervised experience or other relevant
professional experience.
4. Social workers refrain from any personal behaviour which damage the functioning of the profession, in
accordance with the values stated in this Code.
5. When relevant, social workers make it clear in public statement or action, whether they are speaking or
acting as individuals or as authorized representatives of a professional association, an agency, or any other
organization.
6. Social workers do not condone,facilitate or collaborate with any form of discrimination, with regard to race,
religion, nationality, gender, gender orientation, age, marital status, political belief, mental and physical ability.
7. Social workers acknowledge the work of and the contributions made by others.
8. Social workers take the responsibility of promoting the values of integrity and competence of the social work
profession. These activities may include teaching, mentoring, research, consultation service, representation
to public bodies, presentations to the community and participation in the activities of SASW.
9. When engaged in evaluation or research, the same principles of

confidentiality and informed consent and respect as given to clients should be accorded to research projects.
The process should be governed by the accepted ethics of research.
10. Social workers refrain from having any form of self-advertisement which makes unsubstantiated claims
pertaining to their work, the services provided and the results that can be expected.
E. SOCIAL WORKERS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITY TO SOCIETY
1. Social workers accept as their primary professional obligation the welfare of those served - individuals, groups
or communities - with due regard to the common welfare. This obligation may require actions to influence
social conditions or policies.
2. Social workers are committed to correcting through professional channels, abuses to good standards
perpetuated by those wrongly using the title “social worker”.
3. Every social worker has the responsibility to give feedback on policies or social conditions which are
detrimental to people he/she relates to in his/her professional capacity. The feedback should be given to
appropriate bodies/persons with the aim of facilitating change.
The SASW Code of Professional Ethics {151 Revision) was edited by Dr Myrna Blake and Ms Prema Thirupathy in 1999. It was subsequently
presented and accepted in principle by the SASW Annual General Meeting on 25 June 1999
The SASW Code of Professional Ethics (2’d Revision) was edited further by Dr Myrna Blake, Mrs Ngiam Geak Kim and Mr Benny Bong in 2004.
The edited version of the SASW Code of Professional Ethics was circulated at the 34th AGM in 2004 for approval. There were no objections
made to the revised version.

NOTES

Practice & Capability Development Branch (PCDB)
Service Development & Management Division (SDMD)
Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF)
Email: [email protected]

2018 Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice CSWP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2018 Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice CSWP

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2018 Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice CSWP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF

SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

• Who the clients are;

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 1

Lishman (1994: 89)

2 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

FSC Social Work Practitioners

Master Practice Leaders

Committee for Practice Standards

Mrs Lee Yean Wun, Chairperson

Staff of Service Development and Management Division

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 3

4 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

1 Mission and Role of FSCs 6

Frameworks of the FSC-CSWP 10

1 The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework 10

Family Service Centre Code of Social Work Practice 24

1 Functions of the FSC-CSWP 24

Practice Domains of the FSC-CSWP 28

Domain 1: Working with Individuals, Families and Communities in a Professional Manner 28

Table 1: FSC-CSWP Groups and Definitions 11

Diagram 1: Values, Knowledge and Skills of Social Work Practitioners 8

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 5

1 Mission and Role of Family Service Centres

2 Framing the Social Work Role within the Mission of FSCs

• A historical and contemporary psychosocial ‘person-in-environment’ understanding of human problems

i. Prioritisation towards more vulnerable and at-risk populations;

3 Purpose of the FSC-CSWP Document

4 The Four Principles of Professional Social Work Practice

6 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

ii. Practice is theoretically informed and directed

iii. Practice is purposive

iv. Practice integrates multiple methods and approaches

Definition of Social Work

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 7

Diagram 1: Values, Knowledge and Skills of Social Work Practitioners

Values Knowledge Skills

A consistent and informed professional, An insight into the role of self

Place of the Social Work Profession in an FSC

Diagram 2: Appropriate and Effective Practice

8 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

• Scope of social work practice in an FSC setting;

• Activities of social work practice in an FSC setting; and

• Indicators of social work practice in an FSC setting.

The FSC-CSWP is specifically referenced in relation to:

• FSC Service Model;

• Social work practice in FSCs; and

• Client groups of FSCs.

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 9

1 The Integrated FSC-CSWP Framework

i. Risk and Complexity Classification

10 FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE

Complexity is recognised as relating to two interrelated features of a practice situation, namely:

i. The number or extent of issues in three areas:

ii. The ‘degree’ or ‘depth’ of the issue in relation to either or both:

Table 1: FSC-CSWP Groups and Definitions

FSC-CSWP Groups Definition

FAMILY SERVICE CENTRE CODE OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE 11

Diagram 3: Risk and Complexity Classification for FSC-CSWP Group 2 to 4