Multifactor Model
Multifactor Model
This fund aimed to achieve “long-term capital growth through high-quality U.S. growth
companies” (income was a secondary objective). To this end, it invested approximately 80%
of its net assets in large or medium blue-chip growth firms, emphasizing leading market
position, seasoned management, and strong financial fundamentals—such as earnings per
share (EPS) and operating cash flow—above all other evaluation metrics.
Started in 1990, the Large Cap Growth fund invested primarily in large-cap domestic
equities. Selection criteria was based on characteristics which included: dominant market
share, established brand name, pricing power, recurring revenue stream, free cash flow, high
returns on invested capital, predictable growth, sustainable growth, enduring competitive
advantage and excellent management. Income from dividends was considered a secondary
objective.
According to its Prospectus, this fund’s goal was “to provide a high level of capital
appreciation through investment in a diversified portfolio of common stocks of small to
medium-sized companies.” Founded in 1986, its managers’ selection criteria involved
applying a “bottom up” approach, or looking at equities in the context of larger market
factors and focusing on those that provided potential for dynamic growth. Current income
(i.e. dividends) was not given consideration. The fund’s multiple managers focused on
companies with a market capitalization of less than $2 billion, and their consistently active
trading resulted in annual turnover that could exceed 100%, as well as increased fees
associated with such an active approach.
This fund, offered by Index Funds Advisors, aimed for long-term capital appreciation via the
purchase of equity in companies within the lowest 8% of total market capitalization (in
general, companies with approximately $1 billion worth of market capitalization or less).
Within this group, the fund targeted securities using traditional value metrics (such as those
with a high book value in relation to their market value). Other metrics, such as price to
earnings ratios and price to cash flows, as well as the conditions of the company’s industry
overall, were also considered. In addition, the fund sought to mitigate the impact of federal
taxes by postponing the realization of net capital gains and minimizing dividend income.
Yahoo (YHOO)
Stanford University graduates Jerry Yang and David Filo founded Yahoo in 1994, seeking to
develop an easier way to navigate the nascent World Wide Web. The company’s IPO,
delivered two years later, marked the beginning of a rapid expansion process that included
forays into online auctions, games, shopping and other services. Yahoo relied on an ad-based
revenue stream, and was one of the few dot.coms to generate consistent profits during the
tech bubble of the late 1990’s.
Altria (MO)
The Altria Group, formerly Phillip Morris, began as a tobacco shop in London in 1847 and
went public in 1881. The cigarette-maker continued to expand and in the 1950’s introduced
its Marlboro brand, pitched by the iconic “Marlboro Man,” which went on to become the
best-selling product in the world. In response to the flood of anti-tobacco litigation that
targeted the company in the 1990s, the company changed its name to Altria (Philip Morris
remained as a subsidiary).