ML ACR Class 1 Pressure Boundary

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 24

The ACR Class 1 Pressure

Boundary

Marc Léger
Director, Materials Engineering
ACRS Subcommittee on Future Plant Designs
Washington D.C.
January 13, 2004
Outline
• Pressure Boundary Features of the ACR
• CANDU Experience
• Pressure Tube Leak-before-Break
• Fuel Channel Standards
− Pressure Tubes
− End Fittings
− Channel Closures for on-power refueling
− Inspection
• Material Surveillance
• Summary

Pg 2
Pressure Boundary Features of the ACR

• Piping, valves, pressure vessels – designed to ASME


• Feeder pipes – multiple, small diameter, pipes from
headers to fuel channels – also designed to ASME

Pg 3
Reactor Coolant System

Pg 4
Pressure Boundary Features of the ACR

• Fuel Channel – designed to Canadian Standards


− Designed to meet intent of ASME with accommodation for
pressure tube and refueling requirements
• Material exceptions
− Zr-2.5%Nb pressure tube
− Modified 403 SS end fitting
• Design differences
− Rolled joint between pressure tube and end fitting
− Channel closure for refueling

Pg 5
ACR Fuel Channel

Pg 6
CANDU Fuel Channel Experience
• Power-reactor experience with pressure tube reactors
in CANDU community began 41 years ago
• Approximately 400 reactor-years of operation of large
CANDU’s worldwide starting in 1971
• Longest-operating, Zr-2.5%Nb pressure tubes currently
have ~ 150,000 hours of operation

Pg 7
CANDU Experience
• Pressure tubes change dimensions over their lifetime
− Maximum 4.5% diametral expansion and ~7% wall thinning
expected in ACR during a 30 year pressure tube lifetime
• Due to irradiation creep and growth in anisotropic material
• Dimensional changes are accommodated by design
− Zr-2.5% Nb deformation performance is well-understood and
predictable within acceptable bounds
• Experience and R&D programs cover the range of ACR
conditions
• Elongation accounted for in feeder clearances and stresses
• Impact of diametral expansion on fuel cooling is taken into
account

Pg 8
Diametral Strain Rates
2.5E-07

2.0E-07
-1
measured strain rate h

1.5E-07

1.0E-07 C6-1 C6-2


C6-3 OPG-1
5.0E-08 OPG-2 P3J17
P3M12 P3K05
0.0E+00
0.0E+00 5.0E-08 1.0E-07 1.5E-07 2.0E-07 2.5E-07
-1
predicted strain rate h

Pg 9
CANDU Experience
• Pressure tube creep ductility limits are large
− Material deformation under irradiation is occurring with stress
exponent close to 1, i.e. strain rate is almost proportional to
stress
− Low stress exponents correspond to very high strains to
failure (superplastic behavior)
− Tests of pressure tube materials indicate high failure strains
− Material surveillance of tubes removed from service has not
identified any microstructural changes indicative of a
potential creep ductility limit

Pg 10
CANDU Experience
• Pressure Tube Integrity
− No pressure tube leaks due to design / material performance since 1986
• Early leaks due to high residual stresses near rolled joints and delayed hydride
cracking (DHC)
• Rupture of Zircaloy-2 pressure tube at power due to contact with calandria tube
and hydride blistering
• One rupture at cold conditions from long manufacturing flaw
− Design, manufacturing and assembly issues that led to early failures have
been solved
• Development of low-stress rolled joint eliminated high residual stresses in
pressure tubes near the joints and prevents crack initiation
• New channel spacer design prevents contact between pressure tube and
calandria tube and thereby prevents potential hydride blister formation in the
pressure tubes
• Improved manufacturing practices and better inspection reduces the possibility
of long manufacturing flaws

Pg 11
CANDU Experience
• DHC mechanism has been carefully studied and is well
understood
− Cracking not possible at operating temperature given that
hydrogen content of tube remains below the hydrogen
solubility limit at temperature
− Crack initiation avoided by low-residual-stress joint technique
and clean system preventing debris flaw formation
− Cracking at lower temperature avoided by pressure reduction

Pg 12
Source and Consequences of Hydrogen Ingress
100

• Corrosion Reaction:
HYDRIDES
Zr + 2H2O ZrO2 + 4H

• fraction of hydrogen
Hydrogen Concentration (ppm)

absorbed by base metal


TSS

• hydrides present when


NO HYDRIDES
Terminal Solid Solubility
(TSS) exceeded

ACR • hydrides can potentially


CANDU 6
Pickering
lead to fracture issues
& Bruce A
• ensure hydrides are not
617°F/325°C 563°F/295°C 482°F/250°C
present during reactor
10
operation at power
1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95
1/T(K) x 1000
Pg 13
CANDU Experience
• Pressure tubes corrode to produce hydrogen, some of
which enters the tube
− In current CANDU reactors, maximum waterside oxide
thickness is 20 to 30 µm after 20 years operation
− Maximum hydrogen pickup is approximately 20 ppm H (as D)
after 20 years of operation except near rolled joints which
exhibit higher hydrogen pickup
− Empirical models of corrosion and hydrogen pickup, based
on experimental programs, produce predictions consistent
with observations from surveillance tubes
• Models include rolled joint region and main body of the tube

Pg 14
80
Measured Deuterium Pickup Compared to Model Predictions

Candu 6 - 5m from the inlet


Deuterium Concentration (ppm)

60

Reactor B 89,98 (P)


Reactor B 92,97,00 (S)
Reactor C 90,93,96,98,99 (S) 95%UCL
40 Reactor D 98 (S)
Reactor E 94 (P)
Reactor E 92,98,01 (S)

20

95%LCL
Mean
0
0 5 10 15 20
Time (hot years) Pg 15
Pressure Tube Leak-before-Break
• Defense-in-depth for normal operation
• Gas circulated through the annuli between pressure
tubes and calandria tubes is continuously monitored
for moisture content
• Fracture toughness and crack growth rates of the
pressure tube material remain at a level at which any
tube, that could potentially develop a crack, would leak
allowing time for leak detection, response and safe
shutdown before the crack becomes unstable
• LBB is demonstrated by a sequence-of-events analysis
using conservative assumptions
Pg 16
Fuel Channel Standards
• Pressure tube
− Pressure tubes are designed to CAN/CSA N285.2 Standard
− Tubes meet CAN/CSA N285.6 Standard and additional AECL
Technical Specifications for material
− Zr-2.5%Nb is an ASTM Standard B353 (UNS R60901) material
− ASME – type criteria apply for allowable design stress levels
− Tubes are a consistent, high quality product
− Current production tubes have improved properties compared
to earlier production achieved by improved material
specifications and production methods – especially with
respect to fracture toughness properties after irradiation – a
result of R&D programs in fracture area
Pg 17
Fuel Channel Standards
• Rolled joint
− Rolled joints will meet CAN/CSA N285.2
− Designed to ASME Section III NB-3200 – “Design by
Analysis”
− Reliable, strong, mechanical joint suitable for zirconium alloy
to stainless steel connection – able to withstand 3x design-
condition axial load including pressure
− Qualification is carried out on production-grade joints
− Each reactor joint checked for designed pressure tube wall
reduction and leak rate on installation

Pg 18
Pressure Tube to End Fitting Joints

Zr alloy
SS End Fitting
Pressure Tube

Pg 19
Fuel Channel Standards
• End Fitting
− Designed to CAN/CSA N285.2 and ASME Section III NB-3200
− Material specified by CAN/CSA N285.6
• Each end fitting made from a single forging
• Modified 403 martensitic SS
− High strength and corrosion resistance with acceptable fracture
toughness
− Excellent operating experience in CANDU – no identified
issues from operation

Pg 20
Fuel Channel Standards
• Channel Closures
− Channel closures are removable pressure boundary
components at the outboard end of an end fitting required to
permit on-power fueling
− Satisfy ASME Class 1 design rules
− Satisfy the following requirements specified by CAN/CSA
N285.2:
• Closure shall be locked in place to prevent inadvertent
removal
• Closures shall be leak tested each time they are installed prior
to removal of the fuelling machine
− CAN/CSA N285.2 requires interlocks to prevent fueling
machine from disengaging before closure is in place
Pg 21
Fuel Channel Standards
• Periodic Inspection Programs for CANDU fuel channels
are designed to monitor for any generic degradation
and are defined by CAN/CSA N285.4
• Single channels removed for material surveillance
purposes from “lead” reactor units
− Source of fracture toughness, corrosion, hydrogen isotope
pick up and DHC growth rate data after irradiation

Pg 22
Summary
• CANDU fuel channels are a proven technology licensed
in five jurisdictions including Korea
• An extensive technology base supports the design

Pg 23
Pg 24

You might also like