Bài So N - Syntax Lesson 5
Bài So N - Syntax Lesson 5
Bài So N - Syntax Lesson 5
- Recursion -> a constituent can contain constituents of the same category as itself.
- Sentences that contain sentences as contituents => sentential recursion
- Đệ quy -> một cấu tử có thể chứa các cấu tử cùng loại với chính nó.
- Câu có chứa câu là nội dung => đệ quy tuần hoàn
S1[ I thought S2[ Georgette said S3[ she burned the fritters]]]
Trong bài thi cuối kì sẽ được yêu cầu vẽ ACA như trên.
He reminded the men that he was in command at every opportunity.
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
S1[ He reminded the men that S2[ he was in command] at every opportunity].
=> phân tích mqh giữa các clauses với nhau.
The fact that you received no greeting from Mars doesn’t mean that it is uninhabited.
S1[ The fact that S2[ you received no greeting from Mars] doesn’t mean that S3[ it is uninhabited]].
1. Complementisers: that and whether
- THAT is a marker of clausal subordination. It serves to introduce subordinate clauses.
=> COMPLEMENTISER
=> that-clause
- The complementiser position - ‘C’ - is defined as: daughter of S-bar (S’) and sister of a following
S.
Có that trong câu thì S’, không có that thì là S
Khi có 1 cái that - C hoặc whether-C ở đầu thì ta sẽ treat nó như 1 NP và chúng ta để đầu, NP sẽ
được đi xuống thành S’ và S’ sẽ được chia ra làm 2 phần là C và S.
- A characteristic of CLAUSAL SUBJECTS is that they can be EXTRAPOSED from under the
subject NP node to the end of the sentence.
- It disconcerted her [that the king was in his counting house].
- It was noticed by the critics [that the book had a missing chapter].
- It is undeniable [that Rachid’s disguise was a success].
- It is empty of meaning => ‘dummy’ subject (chủ ngữ giả: không có ý nghĩa nhưng đóng 1 vai trò
quan trọng trong cú pháp của câu)
=> EXPLETIVE IT
- When the verb is TRANSITIVE or INTENSIVE, extraposition of the clause subject was
OPTIONAL.
TRANS hoặc INTENSIVE có thể đổi that lên làm mệnh đề chủ ngữ.
+ It disconcerted her that the king was in his counting house. (trans)
=> That the king was in his counting house disconcerted her.
+ It was worrying them whether Rory should be fired. (intens)
=> Whether Rory should be fired was worrying.
It disconcerted her that the king was in his counting house. => That the king was in his counting
house disconcerted her.
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
That the squid sauce was a mistake soon became clear.
It isn’t my fault Max crushed your monocle. => That Max crushed your monocle isn’t my fault.
It was noticed by the critics that the book had a missing chapter.
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
- When the verb is INTRANSITIVE, extraposition is OBLIGATORY.
INTRANS thường không thể đổi that lên làm mệnh đề chủ ngữ.
+ It seems [that the recipe involves some dubious ingredients] (intrans)
*Complement of V within VP:
I thought S2[ Georgette said S3[ she burned the fritters]]
xem xét cụm “that her hair is dyed” đem ra làm CN được không? => xét AP
*Complement of N within NP:
Noun complement clauses can only complement ABSTRACT nouns like fact, rumour, idea, news,
claim, suggestion, message, indication, etc.
The clause is said to ‘complement the noun’ because it’s in the same relation to the N within NP as
clauses that complement the V in VP.
The following sentences include a that-clause following a noun, but only in two of them does that-
clause function as noun-complement clause within an NP. Identify them.
=> An interrogative (whether-) clause can function as the complement of a preposition within PP
=> That-clause cannot function as complement to a P within PP.
The question of whether they should revamp the website was raised.
after, until, before, since are prepositions that can take either a clause (S) or an NP as complement.
- IF makes the subordinate clause function as a CONDITIONAL adverbial clause (same with
UNLESS)
- BECAUSE => adverbial clause of REASON/RESULT
- SO => adverbial clause of PURPOSE
- Adverbials can’t modify N or NOM
- Now that, so that, except that, as if, in case, in order that, as soon as => Complementiser (use
triangle to represent them in phrase markers)
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
M5-2:
Contents:
– Wh-questions
– Subordinate wh-clauses
+ Subordinate wh-interrogative clauses
+ Relative clauses
• Omission of the wh-phrase
• That again
• Restrictive vs non-restrictive
– For where, when, how, and why, decide on the most likely category of the gap it has left behind:
• AdvP
• PP
• AP
Where did Lisa put it? => (Possible answer: under the bed.)
Whose poem did Stevens suggest would be ideal for the lecture?
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
2. SUBORDINATE Wh-clauses
– Subordinate wh-interrogative clauses
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
– Relative clauses
• Non-interrogative wh-clauses
• Function as MODIFIERS
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that
• The NOUN-COMPLEMENT CLAUSES in [a] give us central information about the head noun
(the ACTUAL CONTENT)
• The RELATIVE CLAUSES tell something else about the head noun (PERIPHERAL CONTENT)
- That again:
+ RESTRICTIVE relative clauses specify more exactly which of the things picked out by the head
noun are being mentioned.
+ NON-RESTRICTIVE relative clauses serve to add extra – parenthetical – information, without
restricting the set of things (triangles, dogs, books, etc.) being mentioned.
As the modifier of a complete NP, the non-restrictive relative clause must be represented as the
sister of that NP within a higher NP.
Note: the wh-phrase/word in non-restrictives can’t be ellipted and it can’t be replaced by that.
Summary:
3 kinds of clauses that can appear within NP:
– Noun-complement clause: sister of N (within NOM).
– Restrictive relative clause: sister of NOM (within NOM).
– Non-restrictive relative clause: sister of NP (within NP).
non-branching: pronoun, name, C-that