Patel Displacement Orissa
Patel Displacement Orissa
Patel Displacement Orissa
d. The ideology of development has been long supported by capitalists and Maoists.
They believe in industrialisation as a necessary stage of development. They also
shared a belief in violence, as a means to impose their will. This view of human
societies as developing through certain fixed stages of development is known as
social evolutionism. The important aspect of social evolutionism and therefore of
the mainstream values promoting industrial development in india and Orissa today,
involves a set of negative stereotypes about tribal people and other small-scale
farmers : as ‘primitive’, ‘backward’, ‘uneconomic’ and ‘unsustainable’. This has been
the dominant view of tribal cultures since European moderns first encountered
them and causes immense underevaluation of tribal culture, which helps justify
destroying it through the idea that resettlement will aid tribal’s development in the
long run.
6. RULE OF LAW : Villagers who maintain a stance against displacement need the utmost
strength and courage, not just because the power nexus confronting them like gangsters and
mining companies with people in the Government who do secret deals with the companies,
but also because of the manufacturing of consent by the media. (Use any one example from
the reading to substantiate the misuse of law)
7. The contrast between houses before and after displacement demonstrates a far-reaching
difference in values and culture. From the 18 th/19th century Scotland to 20th/21st century
Orissa essentially the same discourse: a view of clansmen and Adivasis as unruly, uncouth,
uneducated, backward and above all uneconomic and standing in the way of progress. Yet
the reality was, and in Orissa still is, that these people grow a large variety of foods on their
land and if the process is labour intensive, it also involves a huge variety of experience and
communication — bathing in stream, complex songs, dances, myths related to the local
landscape, visits between communities, clan feats — and careful preservation of the natural
environment.
Conclusion:
The reckless displacement of the tribal population has resulted in a decline in the living standards. It
has had a negative impact on the food security and replaced self-employment with a dependency on
a supply labouring jobs. The egalitarian social structure has been replaced by a low place in an
extreme hierarchy which has caused splits in the community between people who are in favour and
against project/company. Their everyday activities are disrupted and so is their cultural framework
with the incessant corruption and goondaism. Thus, it is required to establish a sound R & R policy. It
must make a more serious attempt at avoiding displacement, or at least ensure a better standard of
life for the displaced population. People’s voices should be heard and quoted in official discourses to
counteract the proliferation of stereotypes. Simultaneously, social impact assessment should be
required with an attitude to serve the people and be sensitive to their lifestyle, knowledge and
culture.