Environment Pollution Development The Case of Uzbekistan
Environment Pollution Development The Case of Uzbekistan
Environment Pollution Development The Case of Uzbekistan
AZAMAT AZIZOV,
JĀNIS ZAĻOKSNIS
ENVIRONMENT, POLLUTION,
DEVELOPMENT:
THE CASE OF UZBEKISTAN
Rīga, 2014
Māris Kļaviņš, Azamat Azizov, Jānis Zaļoksnis. Environment,
pollution, development: the case of Uzbekistan. Riga, UL Press, 2014
© Māris Kļaviņš,
Azamat Azizov,
Jānis Zaļoksnis, 2014
© University of Latvia, 2014
ISBN 978-9984-45-888-5
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2. UZBEKISTAN: A COUNTRY WITH HISTORY, PRESENT AND FUTURE . . . . . . . . 9
2.1. Geographic situation and climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2. Natural resources of Uzbekistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.3. Biological resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.4. Natural ecosystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3. WATER RESOURCES OF UZBEKISTAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.1. Hydrological cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.2. Water resources of Uzbekistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.3. River Amu Darya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.4. River Syr Darya . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.5. The Aral Sea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4. HUMANS AND THE ENVIRONMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.1. Systems of the Earth: the lithosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere and biosphere . . 43
4.1.1. Environmental science – a science of environmental systems . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.1.2. Atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.1.3. Biosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.2. Cycling of elements and energy on the earth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.2.1. Energy flow and the Earth’s climate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.2.2. Carbon cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
4.2.3. Nitrogen biogeochemical cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
4.2.4. Phosphorus biogeochemical cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
5. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
5.1. Environmental pollution and environment quality degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
5.2. Global environmental pollution problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
5.2.1. Earth’s ozone layer and the consequences of its depletion . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
5.2.2. Global warming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.3. Regional environmental pollution effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.3.1. Sulphur compounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.3.2. Nitrogen compounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
5.3.3. Dust and aerosols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
5.4. Indoor air pollutants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
6. ACTION OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES IN THE ENVIRONMENT –
BASIC CONCEPTS OF ECOTOXICOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
6.1. Concept of ecotoxicology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
6.2. Effects of toxic substances on living organisms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
6.2. Toxicity assesment of substances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
3
6.3. Effects of pollutants and physical factors on humans and ecosystems . . . . . . . . 107
6.3.1. Types of toxic effects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.3.2. Effects of environmental pollutants and factors on human beings . . . . . . 108
6.3.3. Effects of environmental pollutants on the endocrine system . . . . . . . . . 109
6.3.4. Genotoxic effects of environmental pollutants and factors . . . . . . . . . . . 112
6.3.5. Carcinogenic effects of environmental pollutants and factors . . . . . . . . . 113
6.3.6. Teratogenic substances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
7. AIR POLLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
7.1. Sulfur compounds in the atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
7.2. Nitrogen compounds in the atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
7.3. Carbon compounds in the atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
7.4. Dust and aerosols in the atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
7.5. Halogenated organic compounds in the atmosphere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
7.6. Urban air pollution problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
7.7. Acid precipitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
7.8. Indoor air pollutants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
8. WATER POLLUTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
8.1. Water resources and their use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
8.2. Natural water composition and conditions of formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
8.3. Most significant water pollution problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
9. POLLUTION OF SOIL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
9.1. Contamination of soil with organic substances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
9.2. Contamination of soils with inorganic substances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196
9.3. Soil desertification and salinization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200
10. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.1. Mutual cooperation and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
10.2. International environmental issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
10.3. Institutions involved in international environmental protection . . . . . . . . . . . 209
10.3.1. International environmental organisations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
10.3.2. Environmental activist groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
10.3.3. International corporations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
10.4. Role of science and scientists in identification and tackling of
environmental problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
10.5. Development of international cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
10.5.1. First phase: sea resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
10.5.2. Second phase: activities of the environmental protection movement
and the united nations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
10.5.3. Third phase: from Stockholm (1972) to Rio de Janeiro (1992) . . . . . . . . . 223
10.5.4. Fourth phase: the period of integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225
10.6. Recent tendencies in international cooperation on environmental protection
and sustainable development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
5
1. INTRODUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION 7
concept of sustainable development is not limited to viewing the short-
term processes (to satisfy the current needs) but also aims at ensuring
equal opportunities for the next generations.
Development, especially in Western societies, is understood as
human domination over nature (illustrated by the phrase ‘man – the
crown of creation’) and the use of its resources for the development of
production. This attitude ignores the role of nature and ecosystems in
providing for the development of humanity; it also ignores the value
of nature per se and that other forms of life and living organisms may
have needs and, most importantly, a right to exist.
The main priorities in the development model that dominates in
Western societies is economic growth and consumption, the latter
being the principal parameter of an individual person’s and humanity’s
Figure 1.2. Monument
welfare. In conformity with this concept, social welfare is the standard
dedicated to Mirzo
Ulugbek in Rīga of life – the part of income that is used to purchase goods and services.
(Photo by M. Kļaviņš) This model of development, based on individual consumption,
eventually leads to huge inequality in terms of income and welfare
even within a single country (especially because of the cyclic nature of
free market economy), to say nothing of the arising differences between
different regions of the world. The inevitable differences resulting from
such welfare model lead to social tension, military conflicts and social
instability.
The consumer society’s development based on the constant in
crease of the need for resources unavoidably leads to the increase in
consumption and industrial waste (pollution) and depletion of resour
ces. Due to the growth of production and growth of consumption, the
nature of environmental problems over the last decades has changed.
Understanding the character of the development in the so-far
existing Western societies was based on the idea of limitless de ve
lopment and growth. Now we have to admit that there are limits to
economic growth. These limits are determined by the planet’s carry
ing capacity, accessibility of resources whose amount is limited, and
the capacity of the planet’s ecosystems to absorb pollution. Although
technological progress can, undoubtedly, increase the efficiency of
resource use, it is impossible to overcome these development limits.
Hence, the development of humanity must guarantee a balance between
the planet’s ability to sustain human existence and the desired lifestyle.
These concepts are relevant also in respect to development of
each specific country and related to a great challenge – the decision
in which direction to develop. These challenges are actual also for
Uzbekistan and rising of public awareness in respect to urgent environ
mental issues and sustainable development is of a key importance. The
current book aims to contribute to these tasks. Another major task is
to summarize the available knowledge about the environment and
environmental problems in Uzbekistan, to provide a comprehensive
overview for the readers both in Uzbekistan and other countries.
1
The chapter is based on the information from Initial communication of the Re-
public of Uzbekistan under the United Nations Framework Convention on cli-
mate change. 1999, Taskhent
Sea. Small mountainous ridges and elevations cross its central part,
closed inland drainage basins are common for the landscape in the
South. In the South and Southeast of the country the plains gradually
transform themselves into ridges and reliefs of the Tien-Shan and
Gissar-Allay mountain systems. Between these ridges are located
vast valleys with plane-like surfaces (e.g. Tashkent-Golodnosteppe
Valley, Fergana and Zeravshan Valleys). The territory of the Republic
is characterised by significant variations in altitude. The lowest spot
is at the bottom of the Mingbulak depression (12 meters under sea
level). Khazret Sultan peak of the Gissar Chain is the highest point,
at 4643 m above sea level.
Uzbekistan’s climate is strongly influenced by its location
between the subtropical and temperate zones. High solar radia
tion, coupled with the unique features of its surface and air
circulation patterns form a continental-type climate. This climate is
characterized by seasonal and day-to-night fluctuations in tempera
ture, long, hot, and dry summers, humid springs, and irregular
(sometimes cold) winters. Depending on the location, average July
temperatures vary from 26 °C in the North, to 30 °C in the South,
with the peak temperature around 45-47 °C. Average January
temperatures are –8 °C in the North, and 0 °C in the South, with the
lowest temperature being –38° (on the Usturt Plateau). Uzbekistan’s
territory is penetrated by diverse air masses. Transformed Atlantic
and Arctic air masses access the vast plains from the North and
Northwest. Incursion of tropical air masses and warm southern
cyclones can occur across Central Asia, particularly during the cold
1
The chapter is prepared with contribution of prof. O. Nikodemus
NATURAL
RESOURCES
Exhaustible Inexhaustible
natural resources natural resources
1
Первое Национальное сообщение Республики Узбекистан по рамочной
конвенции ООН об изменении климата. Ташкент 1999. – 110 с.; Второе
национальное сообщение РУз по рамочной конвенции ООН об изменении
климата. Ташкент 2008. – 205 с.
References
Initial communication of the Republic of Uzbekistan under the United
Nations Framework Convention on climate change. 1999, Taskhent
Атлас Узбекской ССР. Ч. 1. – М-Ташкент ГУГК, 1982. – 124 с.
Окружающая среда и безопасность в бассейне Амударьи. ЮНЕП, ПРООН,
ЕЭК ООН, ОБСЕ, РЭЦ, НАТО. 2011. – 11 с. Accessible: www.unep.org.
Первое Национальное сообщение Республики Узбекистан по рамочной
конвенции ООН об изменении климата. Ташкент 1999. – 110 с.;
Второе национальное сообщение РУз по рамочной конвенции ООН
об изменении климата. Ташкент 2008. – 205 с.
Национальный доклад о состоянии окружающей среды и использова-
нии природных ресурсов в Республике Узбекистан (1988-2007).
Госкомприроды. Ташкент, 2008. – 298 с. Accessible: www.econews.uz.
Экологический обзор Узбекистана, основанный на индикаторах.
ПРООН, Госкомприроды РУз. Ташкент 2008. – 88 с.
Central Asia Atlas of natural resources. ADB. 2009. – 173 с.
Азизов А. А. Водные ресурсы Центральной Азии – проблемы безопас-
ности и управления. Сб. научных трудов «Водохранилища, чрез-
вычайные ситуации и проблемы устойчивости. МВССО РУз, НУУз.
Ташкент 2004. – стр. 32-42.
1
«Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy»
or EU Water Framework Directive
Soil (0.41%)
Underground
Rivers and lakes (0.82%) waters (20.58%)
Freshwater
Rivers and lakes (0.02%) Soil (0.01%)
Underground waters (0.50%)
Glaciers and icecaps (1.90%)
Freshwater
storage
Surface
Infiltration runoff
Rivers Evaporation
Groundwater Ocean surface
runoff
Water storage
in the oceans and seas
25 000 km3
20 000
15 000
10 000 Agriculture
Figure 3.3. Water 5000
consumption variability Industry
Public utilities
tendencies and forecasts
in the main sectors 1960 1975 2000 2030 2060
1
Вода жизненно важный ресурс для будущего Узбекистана. Ташкент,
ПРООН. 2007. – 128 с.; www.undp.uz.
2
Чуб В. Е. Изменение климата и его влияние на природно-ресурсный потен-
циал Республики Узбекистан. Ташкент: Главгидромет РУз, 2000. – 252 с.
3
Атлас Узбекской ССР. Ч.1. – М-Ташкент ГУГК, 1982. – 124 с.
4
Миддендорф А. Ф. Очерки Ферганской долины. С приложением К. Шмидта
«Химических исследований почв и воды». Перевод с немецкого В. И. Кова
левского. СПб., 1882. – 489 с.
TURKMENISTAN
ARAL 20
SEA KAZAKHSTAN
LAKE
Syr BALKHASH
-Da 10
rya
Figure 3.5. Water
CASPIAN
Am withdrawal and
u- 0
SEA Da
ry
CH I NA availability in the Aral
a
IRAN
Sea basin (Philippe
0 200 400 600 km
AF GHANIST AN Rekacewicz, UNEP/
P A K I ST A N
GRID-Arendal)
1
Gleick P.H. (2008). «The World’s Water 2008-2009». Island Press, Washington,
D.C.
Table 3.4. Water Resources (km3/year) of the Rivers of the Aral Sea Basin2,3
1
Ирригация Узбекистана. Том I, Развитие ирригации в комплексе произво-
дительных сил Узбекистана. Ташкент, Из-во «Фан» 1975. – стр. 138‑169.
2
Окружающая среда и безопасность в бассейне Амударьи. ЮНЕП, ПРООН,
ЕЭК ООН, ОБСЕ, РЭЦ, НАТО. 2011. – 11 с. www.unep.org.
3
Вода жизненно важный ресурс для будущего Узбекистана. Ташкент, ПРО-
ОН. 2007. – 128 с.; www.undp.uz.
4
Национальный доклад о состоянии окружающей среды и использова-
нии природных ресурсов в Республике Узбекистан (1988-2007). Госком
природы. Ташкент, 2008. – 298 с.; www.econews.uz
OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS THE AREA OF CULTIVATED LAND PER CAPITA
HAS REDUCED BY
30% 20% 15% 15% 9%
8000
7800
7600
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
1
Ирригация Узбекистана. Том I, Развитие ирригации в комплексе произ
водительных сил Узбекистана. Ташкент, Из-во «Фан» 1975. – стр. 138‑169.
1
Географический энциклопедический словарь. М.: «Советская энцикло
педия» 1989. – 591 с.
1
Schluter M., Savitsky A.G., McKinney D.C., Lieth H. (2005) Optimizing long-
term water allocation in the Amudarya River delta: a water management model
for ecological impact assessment. Environm. Modelling Software 20 529-545
1
Оценка региональных рисков в Центральной Азии: реагирование на угро-
зы в области водной, энергетической и продовольственной безопасности.
Программа развития ООН. Региональное бюро по странам Европы и СНГ.
ЮНДП. Нью-Йорк. Январь 2009. www.undp.org/rbec
1
Хамраев Н. Р., Ахунди М. Н., Эргашев А. К. Проблемы и перспективы устой-
чивого развития водохозяйственного сектора государств бассейна Араль-
ского моря. – Ташкент. – 1998. – 85 с.
4000
Flow reduction
3000
was formed about 5.5 million years ago. Formerly an area of the Aral
Sea was 68 000 km2 Aral Sea has been steadily shrinking since the
1960s after the rivers that fed it were diverted by Soviet irrigation
projects. The shrinking of the Aral Sea has been called «one of the
planet’s worst environmental disasters».
Prior to the drying of the Aral Sea, its volume was 1064 km3,
rivers Amu Darya and Syr Darya supplied yearly 56 km3, but
atmospheric precipitations (annual precipitation ranges between
90‑100 mm) added 9 km3, however the evaporation amounted on
average 65 km3 per year. The maximal depth of the Sea was 69‑66 m.
Presently the maximum depth of the North Aral Sea is 42 m (as of
2008). Irrigation resulted in a sharp decline of the water in-flow
to the Aral Sea, and, consequently, a drop in the Sea’s water level,
shrinking of its surface area, and an increase in salinity. By 1994,
the Sea’s total surface dropped to 31 700 km2. During 20th century
the sea’s surface has decreased by 75% and its volume by 90%. Salt
marsh and salty shifting sand areas formed and became sources of
Aral Sea played a key role in the economy of the region. Annual
fish harvesting was approximately 400-500 thousand metric
centners, and the volume of cargo turnover was ~250 000 tons. The
Aral crisis is one of the most significant ecological disasters. About
35 million people including a considerable part of the Uzbekistan’s
1
Johansson O., Aimbetov I., Jarsjo J. (2009) Variation of groundwater salinity
in the partially irrigated Amudarya River delta, Uzbekistan. J. Mar. System, 76,
287-295
Am
Am Bukhara
u-D
u- Bukhara
Da
ari
TURKMENISTAN TURKMENISTAN
a
ria
Figure 3.14. The socio- Dry zone and unusable
Fishing zone areas (salination)
economic impacts of the
shrinking of the Aral Sea Food crops, partly irrigated Cotton and rice, Dam
widely irrigated Cotton and
(Philippe Rekacewicz, Fish exports
UNEP/GRID-Arenda) Fish imports rice exports
Table 4.2. Mass of the Earth’s main components and the turnover period of
substances in them
120
100 Thermosphere
80
Height (km)
Mesosphere
60
40
Stratosphere
20 Figure 4.3. Variability of
the Earth’s atmosphere
Troposphere
and temperature
0 depending on the
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
distance from the Earth’s
Temperature (°C)
surface
Oceanic crust
(5 km) Lithosphere
(50–200km)
Upper mantle
Asthenosphere
Lower mantle
4.1.3. Biosphere1
The biosphere is the part of the Earth’s environment in which The total number of
living organisms are found, and it comprises the upper part of the hitherto known species
lithosphere, the lower part of the atmosphere (troposphere) and the
of animals and plants
reaches almost 3 million;
entire hydrosphere. The biosphere is simultaneously the entirety of all from these, almost
living beings (biomass) and their habitat environment. The biosphere 300 000 are autotrophs,
is the space inhabited by living organisms in different concentrations. i.e. organisms producing
Whereas there are only a few bacteria per cubic meter in the upper the primary biomass. All
layers of the atmosphere, there is not only high biological diversity other organisms are he‑
terotrophs – they are the
but also a huge number of individuals within a specific unit area in consumers of the primary
the tropical rainforests of the equatorial zone. The biosphere is an biomass. Angiosperms
extremely complicated and dynamic system which is affected by a have the largest number
multitude of different external factors, including contingent ones, such of species among plants,
as the tectonic processes in the Earth’s crust, ice covers and natural whereas insects, molluscs
and vertebrates cham‑
disasters. pion among animals.
The total estimated global mass of living biological organisms is Fungi – being neither
the biomass, and it ranges from 2.4 × 1012 tons to 1 × 1013 tons of dry plants nor animals – have
matter, the largest part of which is phytomass (phytoplankton, trees, a special place among
grasses), whereas the amount of zoomass is estimated from 2 to 10 per living organisms. They
also are heterotrophs and
cent of the total biomass. The total of approximately 2.3 × 1011 tons of
have a vast number of
biomass is produced annually. Biomass constitutes 0.01% of the mass species.
of the Earth’s crust, and it would make a 2 cm layer if it were evenly
dispersed over the Earth’s surface. The largest amounts of biomass are
concentrated in tropical rainforests – 65 kg/m3 on average, whereas
in boreal forests (taigas) it is 20‑25 kg/m3, in fertile zone steppes –
1 kg/m3, in deserts – 0.25 kg/m3. The concentration of biomass in the
World Ocean at large is close to that of deserts, while in some places it is
comparable to steppes and savannas. However, marine organisms have
higher rates of reproduction and decomposition because their biological
cycling is more intensive. Plankton is the largest and most significant
community of living organisms on this planet. Although the mass of
living matter is relatively small compared to the mass of the Earth’s
crust, the cycling processes there are much more intense. It is estimated
1
This chapter has been prepared with contribution of prof. V. Melecis.
Figure 4.5. An
ecosystem is made up
of a whole of elements
of non-living nature
(biotope) and a whole
of living organisms
(species community) Biotope Biotope + species community = ecosystem
Meso-ecosystem
Forest
Secondary predators
Primary predators
Herbivores
Green plants
Excrements,
dead plant and animal material
Primary predators
Sediment litification
IGNEOUS SEDIMENTARY
Come to the
ROCKS ROCKS
Earth’s surface
Cooling METAMORPHIC
ROCKS
Melting
Reflected from
the Earth’s
surface
324 W/m2
30 W/m2
Back
350 W/m2 radiation
Solar radiation
Infrared
radiation
Gas concentration in
the atmosphere, parts Lifetime in the
Emission
Greenhouse gas per trillion atmosphere,
per year
years
1998 1750
Carbon dioxide CO2* 365 278 26.4 GT1
Methane CH4** 1745 700 600 Tg 8.4
Nitrogen(I) oxide N2O** 314 270 16.4 Tg N 120
Perfluorethane C2F6 3 0 ~2 Gg 10 000
Freon 11 CFCl3 268 0 45
Freon 23 CHF3 14 0 ~7 Gg 260
* Concentration expressed in parts per million.
** Concentration expressed in parts per billion.
1
Hereinafter the concentration of greenhouse gases is expressed in number of
parts by volume (part-per notation) – correspondingly: ppm – parts per mil-
lion; ppb – parts per billion; ppt – parts per trillion. This concentration notation
shows the amount of substance per air volume. For example, 300 ppm means
that a million of gas molecules in the air contains 300 molecules of the respec-
tive greenhouse gas or that a million air volume units (for example, cubic centi-
metres) contains 300 cm3 of the respective gas.
Peta (P) – 1015 Tera (T) – 1012 Giga (G) – 109
Milli (m) – 10–3 Micro (µ) – 10–6 Nano (n) – 10–9
Solar radiation
Solar radiation intensity (W m-2) intensity value
-2 -1 0 1 2 (W m-2)
10
8
CO2 emissions (GtC/year)
5.5
0.5
Energy production,
121.3 60 Vegetation 610
1.6 motor transport, industry
4000
60
Soils 92
1580 90 Rivers
50 Ocean surface 1020
Marine biota 3 40 100
91.6
6 Coal, oil,
4 Deep ocean carbonate rocks
Dissolved organic
Figure 4.21. Carbon 38 100
carbon <700 6 0.2
cycle.
Amounts stated in PgC, Sediments 150
flows – in PgC/y.
N2 N2O
Precipitation Decomposition products
Assimilation of living organisms
Denitrification
Organic matter
Ammonification
Nitrates (NO3)
Nitrification NH4+ Figure 4.22. Natural
Nitrogen fixing Nitrification processes of nitrogen
bacteria Leaching Nitrites (NO2) compounds in the
environment
N2 in the atmosphere
Fixation of N2
in the atmosphere 125
Industrial fixation of N2
Fixation of N2 fossil fuel combustion 125
in the soil 110
Runoff 20
Soils Conversion of nitrogen
compounds: denitrification 100
Fixation of N2 in the hydrosphere 140
200
Tg N/year
Natural N Total
150 fixation
amount
Fertilisers
100
50 Agricultural N fixation
Figure 4.24. Nitrogen
Fossil fuel combustion
0 fixation amounts in
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2050 nature and by human
Year activity on a global scale
Vegetation
Terrestrial living Production of phosphate
organisms Agricultural, fertilisers and compounds
industrial,
household utilisation
Soils Runoff
Rivers
Marine living organisms
Sedimentation
Phosphate
sedimentary rocks
References
Begon M., Townsend C., Harper J. L. (2005) Ecology. From Individuals to
Ecosystems. Boston: Blackwell Pub.
Berner E. K., Berner R. A. (1996) Global Environment. Water, Air and
Geochemical Cycles. N.Y.: Prentice Hall.
Botkin D., Keller E. (2000) Environmental Science: Earth as a Living Planet.
N.Y.: Wiley and Sons.
Enger E. D., Smith B. F. (2006) Environmental Science: A Study of
Interrelationships (10th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Geochemical Cycles. (1991) Chapter 23 in Inorganic Geochemistry
(ed. Faure G.). N.Y.: Macmillan Pub.
Lovelock J. (2007) The Revenge of Gaia. London: Penguin Books.
Nebel B. J. (1990) Environmental Science: The Way the World Works. N.Y.:
Prentice Hall.
Rydén L. (ed.) (2003) Environmental Science. Uppsala: Baltic University
Press.
Biogeochemical Cycles. Accessible: www.enviroliteracy.org/subcategory.
php/198.html.
Environmental Microbiology. Accessible: www-micro.msb.le.ac.uk/109/
Environmental.html.
Leopold Education Project. Accessible: www.lep.org/.
World Resources Institute. Accessible: http://materials.wri.org/topic_data_
trends.cfm.
40
UV-B
UV-A
UV-C
35
30
25
Altitude (km)
20
Figure 5.3. Variability of
15 the ozone concentration
10 over the Antarctic
29 July 1998 and the absorption
5 8 October 1997
of UV radiation in the
3 October 1998
atmosphere depending
0
0 5 10 15 20 on the UV radiation
Partial pressure of ozone (mPa) wavelength
O O2
O2 +
O O2
Figure 5.4. Ozone
molecule formation
induced by UV radiation O3
Lifetime in the
Substance Usage
atmosphere, years
Freons, CFC – 11 CFCl3 In aerosols, refrigerant 55
CFC – 12 CF2Cl2 In aerosols, solvent 116
CFC – 22 CHFCl2 Solvent 400
Chloroform, CHCl3 Solvent, reagent 0.7
Carbon tetrachloride, CCl4 Solvent, in firefighting 4.7
Nitrogen oxides, NOx In industry, energy A couple of days
Methane, CH4 In agriculture, industry 10.5
Freons
40 000
20 000
Figure 5.6. Changes in
the production amounts
of ozone-depleting
0 substances in the EU
1986 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2007 Member States
400 2000
1800
CO2 (ppm), N2O (ppm) (CO2)
(CH4) 1600
350 (N2O)
CH4 (ppb)
1400
1200
Figure 5.7. Changes in
300
the concentrations of 1000
carbon dioxide (CO2),
nitrogen(I) oxide (N2O) 800
and methane (CH4) in
250 600
the atmosphere during 0 500 1000 1500 2000
the last 2000 years Year
The phrase ‘global warming’ denotes not only the increase in the
Earth’s average temperature (Figure 5.8), usually measured as the
average temperature per year, but also substantial changes in the
entire climate system.
7
Deviation from the mean temperature
6
5
4
(1961–1990) (°C)
Prognosis
3
2
1
Figure 5.8. Temperature 0
changes in the Northern
Hemisphere during the -1 Instrumental
Reconstruction of temperature
last 1000 years and a -2 measurement results
prognosis of possible 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100
changes in the future Year
0,0 14,0
-0,5 13,5
Deviations1961–1990 (mm)
-50
-100
-150
4
40
0
36
September May
Figure 5.10. Average
monthly temperature August June
rise in Rīga
(1851-2008 I-XII) July
2020–2029 2090–2099
400
300
Sea level changes (mm)
200
100
-100
6000
4000
2000
Figure 5.14. Changes in
the total sulphur dioxide
emissions in the EU
0
Member States 2000 2002 2004 2006
Marine transport 2%
14000
12000
10000
8000
Figure 5.16. Emission
6000
amounts of nitrogen
oxides and ammonia 4000
and their changes in 2000
the European Union 0
Member States 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Nitrogen (N2)
Oxygen (O2)
Combustion
Formaldehyde
Benzol
Figure 5.20. Comparison
Dust
of typical concentrations
of indoor ( ) and Nitrogen oxides
urban environment Sulphur dioxide
( ) air pollutants and Carbon oxide
the concentration Carbon dioxide
intervals in the indoor Concentration (µg/m3)
air ( ) 1 10 102 103 104 105 106 107
References
Baird C., Cann M. (2005) Environmental Chemistry. N.Y.: W. H. Freement
and Company.
Berner E. K., Berner R. A. (1996) Global Environment: Water, Air and
Geochemical Cycles. N.Y.: Prentice-Hall.
Botkin D., Keller E. (2000) Environmental Science: Earth as a Living Planet.
N. Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
Jacobson M. Z. (2002) Atmospheric Pollution: History, Science and
Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Hare G., Sweeney J., Wilby R. (2005) Weather, Climate and Climate
Change. London: Pearson Education.
Air Quality in Europe. Accessible: www.airqualitynow.eu/.
Air Quality in the EU. Accessible: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/
index_en.htm.
European Environment Agency. Accessible: www.eea.eu.int.
European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme. Accessible: www.emep.int.
Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution. Accessible: www.lbl.gov/Education/ELSI/
pollution-main.html.
Ozone Internet Resources. Accessible: www.ciesin.org/TG/OZ/oz-net.html.
United Nations Environment Programme. Accessible: www.unep.org/themes/
ozone/.
US EPA. Accessible: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/strathome.html.
World Health Organisation. Accessible: www.who.int/topics/en.
World Health Organisation. Accessible: www.who.int.
Cholesterol
Proteins
Membrane
25
0.5
0.04
Figure 6.4.
Bioconcentration of DDT
0.000003 in aquatic food chain
Permanent damage
Reaction to the substance
Reversible damage
a Figure 6.7. Reactions
in living organisms
Homeostasis
depending on the
quantity of the
substance taken in:
a) the substance is
necessary for the
b
functioning of the body;
0 LD50 Dosage b) the substance is not
necessary for the body
LD50
Substance Testing animal
(mg/kg of body mass)
Ethanol Mice 10 000
Sodium chloride Mice 4000
Morphine sulphate Rats 900
Acute toxicity can be Phenobarbital Rats 150
defined as the total
negative effect caused by DDT Rats 100
a toxic substance taken in Strychnine sulphate Rats 2
a single dose. Analogous Nicotine Rats 1
to acute toxicity, chronic
Tetrodotoxin Mice 0.1
toxicity can be defined
as the total negative Dioxin Rats 0.001
effect caused by a toxic Botulinus toxin Rats 0.0001
substance affecting a
living organism over a
longer period of time. The effects of physical or biological factors can be assessed
and studied like the effects of toxic substances, i.e. analysing the
correlations between the doses (action intensity and amount) and
the organism’s responses.
Parathyroid glands
Thyroid gland
Thymus
Adrenal gland
Ovaries
Prostate
Food additives
Smoking
Cell differentation
Cell proliteration
Cell migration
Continued growth
Degree of Sensitivity
Implantation
Functional Maturation
Fertilization
Histogenesis
Organogenesis
Birth
Substance Effect
Metals and their compounds
Facilitates spontaneous abortion and nervous
Lead
system disorders
Methylmercury Teratogenic effect on the nervous system
Lithium Teratogenic effect on the heart
Aluminium Teratogenic effect on the nervous system
Arsenic Teratogenic effect
Pharmaceuticals
Diethylstilbestrol Adenocarcinoma
Thalidomide Teratogenic effect
Retinoids Teratogenic effect
Chemicals
Ethyl alcohol Intoxication of the foetus
Chloro-organic pesticides Facilitate spontaneous abortion
Polychlorinated biphenyls Teratogenic effect
Ethylene oxide Facilitates spontaneous abortion
Dioxin Teratogenic effect
References
Information notices on diagnosis of occupational diseases. (2009)
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities.
Investigating Environmental Disease Outbreaks: A Training Manual. (1991)
Geneve: WHO.
Newman M. C. (1998) Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology. Ann Arbor Press.
Timbrell J. A. (2002) Introduction to Toxicology. 3rd ed. London: Taylor and
Francis.
Walker C. H., Hopkin S. P., Sibly R. M., Peakall D. B. (2001) Principles of
Ecotoxicology. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis.
Wright D. A., Welbourn P. (2002) Environmental Toxicology. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Aldridge W. N. (1996) Mechanisms and concepts in toxicology. Washington:
Taylor and Francis.
Appraisal of tests to predict the environmental behaviour of chemicals.
(1985) (Ed. P. Sheehan, F. Korte). Chichester: J. Wiley.
Aquatic ecotoxicology (1991) Fundamental concepts and methodologies
(Ed. A. Boudon, F. Ribeyre), Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gibaldi M. (1990) Biopharmaceuticals and clinical pharmacokinetics.
Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Handbook of environmental chemistry (Ed. O. Hutzinger) vol. 1-24
(1980–1994), Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Lu F. (1996) Basic Toxicology. Washington: Taylor and Francis.
Moriarty F. (1999) Ecotoxicology: the study of pollutants in ecosystems.
London: Academic Press.
of a work area or the atmosphere in the form of gas, vapour, aerosols Carbon oxide
or dust. To protect both workers and residents, several criteria Sulfur dioxide
Nitrogen oxides
(limit value) have been established in order to limit the maximum
Hydrocarbons
permissible concentrations of various harmful substances in the air.
Solid particles
Air quality measurements for air pollution analysis are usually Other
made in ambient air. However, air pollution in the human living
environment – dwelling premises and workplaces – may affect the Figure 7.3. Emissions
human health considerably more. All kinds of local sources – such of pollutants from
as kitchens, stoves, furniture, polymers, painted surfaces, domestic stationary pollution
animals – can cause serious indoor air pollution. Room ventilation sources in Uzbekistan
also affects the air pollution level. Ventilation should be balanced
with the need to maintain the optimum temperature in dwelling
2%
premises. 4%
Pollutants quickly spread over rather long distances in the atmo 13%
sphere, therefore the solution to atmospheric air pollution problem
should be considered internationally. A specific air pollution problem
8%
2%
to be addressed is air quality in residential areas and working
71%
environ ment. These issues relate to the fact that humans are
increasingly faced with harmful and toxic substances both at home
and at workplace. Carbon oxide
Sulfur dioxide
70 Nitrogen oxides
Benzene Hydrocarbons
Ozone
60 Sulphur dioxide Particulates
Nitrogen oxides Other
Concentration, µg/m3
50
10
0
Figure 7.5. Average
February
March
January
September
April
May
August
October
December
June
July
November
monthly pollutant
concentrations in Riga
air
Global
problems
Regional
problems
Local
problems
Dust 41.3
Ammonia 32.6
Table 7.1. Air quality standards for major air environment pollutants
Concentration of
U.S.A. air quality EU air quality
Pollutant substance in the air
limits guidelines
analysis’ duration
Carbon 8-hour average 10 mg/m3 10 mg/m3
monoxide (CO) 1-hour average 40 mg/m 3
-
Nitrogen the average annual 100 μg/m3 40 μg/m3
dioxide (NO2) 1-hour average - 200 μg/m3
8-hour average 157 μg/m 3
120 μg/m3
Ozone (O3)
1-hour average 235 μg/m3 -
the average annual 78 μg/m 3
-
Sulfur dioxide
24-hour average 365 μg/m3 125 μg/m3
(SO2)
1 – hour average - 350 μg/m3
700
600 Mobile sources
Stationary sources
Th. tons/year
500
400
300
200
100
Figure 7.11. Sulfur
0 dioxide emissions from
1991 1995 2000 2005 2010 mobile and stationary
Year sources in Uzbekistan
45
NOx
40
SO2
35
Amount, Th. tons
30
25
20 Figure 7.12. Sulfur
15 dioxide and nitrogen
10 oxide emission
5 amount variability in
0 Latvia, 1990–2001 and
emissions forecast until
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2010
2015
2020
2020.
1000
SO2 AVG NO2 AVG
SO2; NO2 concentration, µg/m3
100
10
Figure 7.15.
Characterisation
of atmospheric air
pollutant concentration 1
changes in the air of
1967
1971
1975
1979
1983
1987
1991
1995
1999
2003
Riga
Smoke
Cyclone
Figure 7.16. Example
of a fuel combustion
plant, whose operation
allows for a significant
reduction in SO2
emissions – a device
Fuel and Heat exchange
for burning fluidized limestone
layer in the presence
of limestone additives,
Boiling
providing exhaust gas
layer Air
decontamination.
c
Pressure
d
b
5000 120
Number of cars
Concentration of nitrogen oxides
100
4000
Concentration, µg/m3
80
Number of cars
3000
60
2000
40
Figure 7.18. Nitrogen
oxide concentrations 1000
20
and changes of traffic
intensity in the streets 0 0
of Riga (Gertrude Street, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
August) Hour
Table 7.4. Nitrogen oxide emissions and major sources of emissions in Latvia,
tons per year
100
80 Trachea
60
Alveoli
40
Figure 7.19. Retention
of the aerosols in the
20
human respiratory
system depending on
the size distribution 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 Particle size, mµ
Purified air
Inlet air
Dust filter
Dust
a b
Removal of
aerosols
Current
source
Electrodes
Spray
Figure 7.20. Polluted
air treatment solutions
from dust and aerosols:
a – cyclone; b – dust
filter; c – scrubber;
c d d – the electrostatic
coagulation
Sedimentation tank
Cyclone
Scrubber
Dust filter
Electrostatic precipitation
Figure 7.21. Comparison
of different technologies
for dust and aerosol 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
removal. Particle size, µm
450
Thousand Ozone Depleting Potential Tonnes (ODP Tonnes)*
CFCs
European Community (25)
400
350
300
United
250 States
200
150
Russia
100
50
China
0
Figure 7.22. Global
production of main ozon 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008
depleting substances * Tonnes multiplied by the ozone depleting potential of the considered gas.
Temperature
Inversion
Inversion layer
Height
NO2
O3
NO
5
4.5
4
3.5
Kg/per capita
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5 Figure 7.28. Emission
0 rates of gases
Poland
Germany
Sweden
Bulgaria
Lithuania
Finland
Estonia
Ireland
Netherland
Austria
UK
Denmark
Latvia
causing atmospheric
acidification in the
European countries
(2004)
Tomato Distilled
juice water
Ammonia
Sulfuric water
acid Sea water
Lemon Rain water
juice Milk Boraq
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Alkaline
Neutral Figure 7.29. pH reaction
Acidic
indicators for different
solutions
6
Indoor air quality
risks, %
5 Outdoor air quality
health risks, %
Health risk factors, %
Bibliography
Aulika B., Avota M., Baķe M. Ā., Dundurs J., Eglīte M., Jēkabsone I.,
Sprūdža D., Vanadziņš I. (2008) Vides veselība. Rīga: RSU.
Baird C., Cann M. (2005) Environmental chemistry. N.Y.: W. H. Freement
and Company.
Berner E. K., Berner R. A. (1996) Global environment. Upper Saddle River:
Prentice-Hall Inc.
O’Hare G., Sweeney J., Wilby R. (2005) Weather, climate and climate
change. London: Pearson Education Ltd.
Hill M. K. (1997) Understanding environmental pollution. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Jacobson M. Z. (2002) Atmospheric pollution: history, science and
regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Principles of environmental chemistry (2007) (Ed. R. M. Harrison)
Cambridge: RSC Publishing.
Van Loon G. W., Duffy S. J. (2008) Environmental chemistry: a global
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiner R. F., Matthews R. (2003) Environmental engineering. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
Williams I. (2005) Environmental chemistry. Chichester: J. Wiley.
1.5
Significance of a factor
Available
Available
amount of Available
freshwater
Population, freshwater in underground
Continents in bodies of
millions the form of freshwater km3/
water, km3/per
ice, km3/per per capita
capita
capita
North America 332 271.08 81.33 12 951.81
South America 378 2.38 9.08 7936.51
Europe 732 24.89 3.45 2185.79
Africa 924 0.0002 34.39 5952.38
Asia 3968 15.37 7.72 1965.73
Australia and
34 5.29 6.50 3529.41
Oceania
Israel
Mongolia Lebanon
Afghanistan
Lao PDR
Turkmenistan
Kyrgyzstan
Myanmar
Tajikistan
Syrian Arab Republic
Saudi Arabia Water withdrawal by Industry
Bangladesh
sector in selected Asian countries
Democratic People's Iran
Republic of Korea Milion of cubic metres per year
Singapore
Pakistan 35 000
Chile Uzbekistan
Republic of Thailand 18 000
Korea
Kazakhstan
3 000
Iraq Philip- Malaysia
pines
India Ukraine
Japan
Inorganic salts
Pesticides
Persistent organic compounds (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls)
Radionuclides
Oil and its derivatives (such as diesel fuel)
Biogenic elements (e.g., nitrate ions, phosphate ions)
Surfactants
Metal compounds
Gases
Toxic inorganic substances (such as cyanide ions)
The heat (thermal pollution)
Pathogenic microorganisms
140
Industrially developed countries
120 Development countries
100
Consumption, kg/ha
80
60
40
Figure 8.5. Changes
20 of chemical fertilizer
consumption trends
0 in industrialized and
1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 developing countries
(NH2)
Ammonification
Biosynthesis
Nitrate assimilation
Nitrification
Table 8.5. Elements required for plant development and their sources in
waters
Biological diversity
Dissolved substances
Figure 8.8.
Eutrophication effects in
Oligotrophic Mesotrophic Eutropic the waters
BOD
Oxygen saturation
Oxygen
Pollution
source
Figure 8.10. Biological
oxygen demand and
water-dissolved oxygen
content changes in the
river water, in case of River flow
waste water discharge
Bibliography
Freeze R. A., Cherry J. A. (1979) Groundwater. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kļaviņš M., Rodinovs V., Kokorīte I. (2002) Chemistry of surface waters of
Latvia. Rīga: LU.
Kļaviņš M., Cimdiņš P. (2004) Ūdeņu kvalitāte un tās aizsardzība. Rīga:
LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Manahan S. E. (1999) Fundamentals of environmental chemistry.
Boca Raton: Lewis Publ.
Praktiskās hidrobioloģijas rokasgrāmata (1995) Rīga : Vide.
Švarcbahs J., Sudārs R., Jansons V., Kļaviņš U., Dreimanis Ē., Bušmanis P.
(2001) Ekoloģija un Dabas aizsardzība. Jelgava: LLU.
Water use and management (2000) (Ed. L. C. Lundin) Uppsala:
The Baltic University.
Национальный доклад о состоянии окружающей среды и исполь
зовании природных ресурсов в Республике Узбекистан (1988-
2007). Госкомприроды. Ташкент, 2008. – 298 с.
Accessible: www.econews.uz.
Окружающая среда и безопасность в бассейне Амударьи. ЮНЕП,
ПРООН, ЕЭК ООН, ОБСЕ, РЭЦ, НАТО. 2011. – 11 с.
Accessible: www.unep.org.
Вода жизненно важный ресурс для будущего Узбекистана. Ташкент,
ПРООН. 2007. – 128 с. Accessible: www.undp.uz.
Большое Аральское море в начале XXI века. Москва: Наука
2012. – 229 с.
Экологический обзор Узбекистана, основанный на индикаторах.
ПРООН, Госкомприроды РУз. Ташкент 2008. – 88 с.
Central Asia Atlas of natural resources. ADB. 2009. – 173 с.
Programme World heritage. Accessible: www.iucn.org/.
World Water Council. Accessible: www.worldwatercouncil.org.
Water Pollution Guide. Accessible: www.water-pollution.org.uk/.
Clean Water Act. Accessible: www.epa.gov/.
Water Pollution and Environment. Accessible: www.webdirectory.com/
Pollution/Water_Pollution/.
From the glaciers to Aral Sea. Water Unites. Accessible: www.waterunites-ca.
org/book.html.
137
Cs concentration, kBq/m2
1480 185 40 10 2
F IN L A N D
NOR W AY
S W EDEN
ESTONIA
R U S S IA
a
Se
DENMA RK
LATVIA
ic
lt
Ba
LITHUANIA
RUSSIA
Phenol Other
1% 5% Hydrocarbons
Cyanides 13%
1%
Heavy Organohalogens
metals 13%
31% Figure 9.3. The most
important groups of
substances, which
Polyaromatic
hydrocarbons are characteristic of
16% pollution of urban and
Oil products industrially used soils in
20%
EU countries
30
Insecticides
Consumprion, tons/km2
25 Fungicides
20 Herbicides
15
10
140
Industrially developed countries
120 Development countries
Consumption, kg/ha
100
80
60
40
Figure 9.6. Pesticides
20 used in the countries
0 with different
1963 1968 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2008 development paths
USA
China
Australia
India
Brasil
Canada
Turkey
Ecuador
Figure 9.7. Amounts of
0 50 100 150 200 250 pesticide use in different
Active substances, tons countries of the world
30
25
20
15
10
0
Figure 9.8. Structure of 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
use of agricultural lands all farmland, including: hay meadow and pasture
in Uzbekistan (th. km2) perrenial cropping arable land
Bibliography
Albert A. (1987) Xenobiosis. London: Chapman and Hall.
Darba vides riska faktori un strādājošo veselības aizsardzība (2001) (Red.
V. Kaļķis, Ž. Roja), Rīga: Elpa.
Gemste I., Vucans A. (2002) Notekūdeņu dūņas un to izmantošana. Jelgava.
Kalniņa D. (2006) Nafta un vides problēmas. Rīga: Rīgas Tehniskā
universitāte.
Kļaviņš M., Cimdiņš P. (2004) Ūdeņu kvalitāte un tās aizsardzība. Rīga:
LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Marsh W. M., Grossa J. M. (1996) Environmental Geography. Science,
Land Use, and Earth Systems. N.Y.: J. Wiley.
Nikodemus O., Kārkliņš A., Kļaviņš M., Melecis V. (2009) Augsnes
ilgtspējīga izmantošana un aizsardzība. Rīga: LU.
Johnston J. J. (2000) Pesticides and Wildlife. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Pazemes ūdeņu aizsardzība Latvijā. (1997) Rīga: LR VARAM.
UNESCO. (2008). Lerning to combat desertification – Teachers kit.
Desertification: a visual synthesis (2011) UNCCD, Zoi Environment
Network.
Окружающая среда и безопасность в бассейне Амударьи. ЮНЕП,
ПРООН, ЕЭК ООН, ОБСЕ, РЭЦ, НАТО. 2011. – 11 с.
Accessible: www.unep.org.
Вода жизненно важный ресурс для будущего Узбекистана. Ташкент,
ПРООН. 2007. – 128 с. Accessible: www.undp.uz.
Первое Национальное сообщение Республики Узбекистан по рамочной
конвенции ООН об изменении климата. Ташкент 1999. – 110 с.;
Второе национальное сообщение РУз по рамочной конвенции ООН
об изменении климата. Ташкент 2008. – 205 с.
Национальный доклад о состоянии окружающей среды и использова-
нии природных ресурсов в Республике Узбекистан (1988-2007).
Госкомприроды. Ташкент, 2008. – 298 с. Accessible: www.econews.uz.
Экологический обзор Узбекистана, основанный на индикаторах.
ПРООН, Госкомприроды РУз. Ташкент 2008. – 88 с.
Central Asia Atlas of natural resources. ADB. 2009. – 173 с.
Soil health. Accessible: www.soilhealth.segs.uwa.edu.au/.
Soil Biological Communities. Accessible: www.blm.gov/nstc/soil/index.html.
EEA – European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
Accessible: www.eea.eu.int/.
Land management and natural hazards. Accessible: eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/.
ADB. (2011) Combating Desertification in Asia. Asian Development Bank.
Accessible: www.adb.org/environment/desertification.asp.
0°
30° 30°
60°
NORW
AY
60°
UK Undefined limit 60°
INA
NT
E
GE
CHIL
AR
AUSTRALIA
90° 90°
Wi aim
tho
cl
ut
70°
120° TR 120°
CE
S
AU
AN
NEW ZEALAND
FR
Figure 10.6. UN
Assembly Hall
Global environmental
Primary production Secondary use
issue
Climate change Extraction of fossil fuel Energy production,
provision of transport
system
Flow of toxic waste Waste recovery and Use of recycled materials
disposal
Decrease in biodiversity Agricultural, biotechno Use of mineral fertilizers,
and biosafety logical and pharma pesticides and modified
ceutical industries organisms in farms
Ozone depletion Chemical industry Production of refrigera
tors, electronic goods
and aerosols
Spread of stable organic Chemical industry Agriculture
compounds
Decrease in forest areas Chemical and forestry Timber industry
industry
Pollution of the World Oil extraction and Sectors that use oil
Ocean transportation products
Place of Year of
Conventions and agreements
adoption adoption
International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling 1946
Radiation Protection Convention 1960
Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Vienna 1963
Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty 1968
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, Especially as Waterfowl
Ramsar 1971
Habitat
UNESCO World Heritage Convention 1972
CITES Convention on International Trade in Wild Species of Fauna and Flora Washington 1973
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships London 1973
Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Bern 1979
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Bonn 1979
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Geneva 1979
United Nations Convention on the Law on Seas 1982
Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer Vienna 1985
Montreal Protocol Montreal 1987
Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological
Vienna 1986
Emergency
Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident Vienna 1986
Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous
Basel 1989
Wastes and Their Disposal
Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context Espoo 1991
Agreement on the Conservation of Bats in Europe London 1991
United Nations Framework Convention on Biological Diversity Rio de Janeiro 1992
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena 2002
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Rio de Janeiro 1992
Kyoto Protocol Kyoto 1997
Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area Helsinki 1992
Convention on the Protection and Use of Trans-Boundary Watercourses and Inter
Helsinki 1992
national Lakes
Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents Helsinki 1992
Convention to combat desertification in countries seriously affected by drought
Paris 1994
and/or desertification, particularly in Africa
Convention on Nuclear Safety Vienna 1994
The Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds 1995
Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of
Vienna 1997
Radioactive Waste Management
Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous
Rotterdam 1998
Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and
Aarhus 1998
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Stockholm 2001
Figure 10.22.
Environmental
protection activists
protest against the
world leaders’ inability
to make decisions on
definite and immediate
actions to diminish the
negative consequences
of climate change.
Copenhagen, COP15
Conference, December
2009
Turkish environmentalists
in anti-nuclear/anti-dam
protest in Istanbul, on the The public has a right to participate in adopting environment-
24th anniversary of the related decisions. These can be decisions on issuing permits for
Chernobyl disaster. polluting activities or construction of major infrastructure objects.
The public has a right to participate in the environmental impact
assessment process of proposed projects and in the preparation of
various environment-related planning documents – including spatial
planning – establishing restrictions for the use of land and buildings
(constructions).
Exercising their rights to participation, members of the public
may express their opinions and concerns with regard to the proposed
Stage 1
Definition of a problem Formulation of a policy
Setting objectives
Problem prioritisation
Approval of objectives
<–2
– 2 to – 1
– 1 to 0
0 to 1
1 to 2
>2 50°
50° Countries
excluded
from study
40°
40°
200
Gg NOx
150
100
50
0
a 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
80
70
60
50
Gg NOx
40
30
20
Figure 11.9. NOx 10
emissions and
projections in Denmark 0
(a) and Latvia (b) b 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Reporting by the
Member States under
Directive 2001/81/EC of Environmental monitoring
the European Parliament
and of the Council of Environ mental monitoring comprises systematic observations,
23 October 2001 on measurements and calculations of environmental situation, pollution,
national emission ceilings emissions, population and species needed for the environ mental
for certain atmospheric assessment and planning of nature conservation and measures for
pollutants.
controlling the effectiveness of environmental protection. In environ
mental information system Development and implementation,
resource accounting data are of great importance – cadastral
data, information on the country’s socio-economic situation and
Development tendencies provided by the national statistical data
analysis and public opinion polling. Effective decision-making
in environmental protection is possible only if all the available
information is analysed.
1
This chapter is prepared based on the materials of the home page of the EU
Directorate-General for the Environment – http://ec.europa.eu/environment/in-
dex_en.htm
EC DG Environment
FINLAND
NORWAY
SWEDEN ESTONIA
LATVIA
DENMARK
IRELAND LITHUANIA
UNITED KINGDOM
NEDERLANDS
POLAND
BELGIUM GERMANY
LUXEMBOURG
CZECH Member countries
REPUBLIC
FRANCE SLOVAKIA Cooperating countries
LIECHTENSTEIN
SWITZERLAND AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
SLOVENIA
ROMANIA
CROATIA
AL
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
TUG
SERBIA
BULGARIA
POR
SPAIN ITALY
MONTENEGRO
FORMER YUGOSLAV
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
ALBANIA
TURKEY
GREECE
Figure 11.16. EEA
MALTA CYPRUS member countries and
cooperating countries
Executive Scientific
Director Committee Figure 11.17. EEA
governance
ETC NRC
ETC
NRC
EEA
ETC
European NFPs
Environment National
Agency NRC
NRC focal
ETC points
Figure 11.18.
NRC
European environment
ETC NRC information and
observation network
References
Barrow C. J. (1999) Environmental Management. Principles and Practice.
London: Routledge.
Bennett M., Sheffield J. P. (eds) (1999) Sustainable Measures. Greenleaf
Publishing.
Clapp J., Dauvergne P. (2005) Paths to a Green World. Cambridge: MIT
Press.
Duchin F., Lange G. M. (1994) The Future of the Environment. Oxford:
Oxford University Press
Klemmensen B., Pedersen S., Dirckinck-Holmfeld K., Marklund A., Ryden L.
(2007) Environmental Policy. Uppsala: Baltic University Press.
Kramer L. (2003) EC Environmental Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Leslie P. T. (1999) Environmentalism for a New Millenium. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
7 400
6
in the atmosphere
5
350
4
3
300
2
1
0 250
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
10 45
Urban population GDP
Population (millions)
9
1990 USD (1012 )
8
7 30
6
5
4
3 15
2
1
0 0
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
6000 28
Water consumption River dams
24
Dams (thousands)
5000
20
4000
16
km3
3000
12
2000 8
1000 4
0 0
1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
300 250
Consumption of fertilisers Paper consumption
250 200
Tons (millions)
Tons (millions)
200
150
150
100
100
Figure 12.1. Variability 50
50
of characteristic human 0
0
development indicators 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
over the last centuries Year Year
Resources
Centre Periphery
Industrial production Source of raw materials
and services with and resources Figure 12.2. Simplified
high added value (including human resources) scheme of division of
Export of goods, services Consumer of goods
and capital and services labour in globalised
economy: structures of
Goods and services centre and periphery
1
Our Common Future (1987) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2
EU sustainable development strategy. Accessible: http://ec.europa.eu/environ
ment/eussd/
Social
domain Economy
1
At preparation of this chapter contribution of J. Brizga is acknowledged.
10
Ecological footprint (hag /per capita)
North America
9
Europe (EU)
8
Europe (outside EU)
7 Latin America and the Caribbean Islands
6 Middle East and Central Asia
5 Asia
4 Africa
3
2
1 Figure 12.10. Ecological
0 footprint in the world
Population (millions) regions
References
Baker S. (2006) Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
Blewitt J. (2008) Understanding Sustainable Development. London:
Earthscan.
Chambers N., Simmons C., Wackernagel M. (2000) Sharing Nature’s
Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability. London:
Earthscan.
Dicken P. (2008) Global Shift. Los Angeles: Sage.
Dresner S. (2008) The Principles of Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Meadows D., Randers J., Meadows D. (2008) Limits to Growth: The 30-year
Update. London: Earthscan.
Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J. (1992) Beyond the Limits:
Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. London:
Earthscan.
OECD. (2002) Towards Sustainable Household Consumption. Paris.
United Nations Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
(2002) Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August – 4 September 2002.
New York: United Nations.
Wackernagel M., Rees W. (1996) Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human
Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our
Common Future (The Bruntland Report). Oxford: World Commission on
Environment and Development, Oxford University Press.
EEA. (2005) Household Consumption and the Environment. Accessible:
http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2005_11/en.
Eurobarometer. (2009) Flash EB No. 256 – Sustainable Consumption and
Production. Accessible: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/
FL256_analytical%20report_final.pdf.
Global Footprint Network. Accessible: www.footprintnetwork.org.
ICLEI – International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. (2004)
Aalborg Commitments. Accessible: www.aalborgplus10.dk/.
Sustainable Development Strategy. Accessible: http://ec.europa.eu/comm/
sustainable/.
WWF – World Wildlife Fund. (2002) Living Planet Report 2002.
Accessible: http://globalis.gvu.unu.edu/indicator.cfm?Country=
LV&IndicatorID=99.
From the glaciers to Aral Sea. Water Unites. Accessible: http://www.
waterunites-ca.org/.
Sustainable development goals. Accessible: http://sustainabledevelopment.
un.org/index.php?menu=1300.
The United Nations Office for Sustainable Development (UNOSD).
Accessible: http://www.unosd.org/.