Whatisorganizationbehaviour 120823030900 Phpapp02
Whatisorganizationbehaviour 120823030900 Phpapp02
Whatisorganizationbehaviour 120823030900 Phpapp02
1) Meaning
2) Definition
3) Nature
4) Characteristics
5) Relative contribution of disciplines on OB
6) Significance of OB
7) Approaches of OB
8) Challenges
9) Do Successful Organizations Put People First?
Meaning
OB is nothing more than developing our understanding and development of people skill. A
multidisciplinary field devoted to understanding individual and group behavior, interpersonal
processes, and organizational dynamics.
OB is Study of human behavior in organizations. There are two words-
1- Organization 2- Behaviour
The study of Organizational Behaviour (OB) is very interesting and challenging too. It is related
to individuals, group of people working together in teams. The study of organizational behaviour
relates to the expected behaviour of an individual in the organization. No two individuals are
likely to behave in the same manner in a particular work situation. It is the predictability of a
manager about the expected behaviour of an individual.
OB is concerned with the study of what people do in an organization (social system) and how
that behavior affects the performance of the organization
• Individual Behavior
• Individual and group behavior
• Organizational structure
DEFINITIONS
According to Luthans
“OB is directly concerned with the understanding, predicting and controlling of human behavior
in organizations.”
According to LM Prasad
The study and application of knowledge about human behaviour related to other elements of an
organization such as structure, technology and social systems
Stephen P Robins
Organizational behaviour as a systematic study of the actions and attitudes that people exhibit
within organizations.
Roman J. Alday
“O.B as a branch of the social science that seeks to build theories that can be applied to
predicting understanding and controlling behavior in work organizations”
“Organizational behaviour is a field of study that investigates the impact that individuals, groups
and organizational structure have on behaviour within the organization, for the purpose of
applying such knowledge towards improving an organizational effectiveness”.
Nature of OB
2) An inter-disciplinary approach
The OB is heavily influenced by several other behavioral sciences and social sciences
like psychology, Sociology and anthropology. O.B. has psychological foundations. The
concept like learning, perception, attitude, motivation etc is borrowed from psychology,
sociology and anthropology.
3) A Normative Science
Organizational behaviour is a normative science. A normative science prescribes how
the various findings of researches can be applied to get organizational results, which are
acceptable to the society. Thus, what is acceptable by the society or individuals engaged
in an organization is a matter of values of the society and people concerned.
1. Large Size
It employ Hundreds and thousands of employees.
2. Human Resources
3. Complexity
It involves huge investment and complicated technology, their management and
operation is a complex affair.
4. Co-ordination
5. Pattern Behavior
There is a system of working in all organization like hierarchical levels, a chain of
command, rules and procedures.
6. Discipline
7. Dynamic
Organization behavior is dynamic rather than static. It essence is reflected in change in
behavior of individuals in organization
Sociology:
Science of Sociology studies the impact of culture on group behaviour and has
contributed to a large extent to the field of group-dynamics, roles that individual plays in
the organization, communication, norms, status, power, conflict management, formal
organization theory, group processes and group decision-making .
Political science:
Political science has contributed to the field of Organizational behaviour. Stability of
government at national level is one major factor for promotion of international business,
financial investments, expansion and employment. Various government rules and
regulations play a very decisive role in growth of the organization. All organizations
have to abide by the rules of the government of the day .
Social psychology:
Working organizations are formal assembly of people who are assigned specific jobs
and play a vital role in formulating human behaviour. It is a subject where concept of
psychology and sociology are blend to achieve better human behaviour in organization.
The field has contributed to manage change, group decision-making, communication
and ability of people in the organization, to maintain social norms.
Anthropology:
It is a field of study relating to human activities in various cultural and environmental
frameworks. It understands difference in behaviour based on value system of different
cultures of various countries. The study is more relevant to organizational behaviour
today due to globalization, mergers and acquisitions of various industries. The advent of
the 21st century has created a situation wherein cross-cultural people will have to work
in one particular industry. Managers will have to deal with individuals and groups
belonging to different ethnic cultures and exercise adequate control or even channelize
behaviour in the desired direction by appropriately manipulating various cultural factors.
Organization behaviour has used the studies on comparative attitudes and cross-
cultural transactions. Environment studies conducted by the field of anthropology aims
to understand organizational human behaviour so that acquisitions and mergers are
smooth.
Significance of OB
• In making communication-
Communication helps people to come in contact with each other. To achieve
organisational objectives, the communication must be effective. The communication
process and its work in inter-personal dynamics have been evaluated by organisational
behaviour.
• Information Technology gives power and information to the one who can
use it best.
• In making group
• In motivation
• In organizational development
Approaches of OB
1. Classical Approach
Scientific Management Approach
Scientific management approach was developed by F.W. Taylor at the beginning of the 20th century. This
theory supported the use of certain steps in scientifically studying each element of a job, selecting and
training the best workers for the job arid making sure that the workers follow the prescribed method of
doing the job. It provided a scientific rationale for job specialization and mass production. His assumption
was that employees are motivated largely by money. To increase the output, Taylor advised managers to
pay monetary incentives to efficient workers.
Yet, his theory was criticized by many employers and workers. Workers objected to the pressure
of work as being harder and faster. Critics worried that the methods took the humanity out of labor,
reducing workers to machines responding to management incentives. Therefore, Taylor's view is now
considered inadequate and narrow due to the points given by the critics.
Administrative Approach
a) Bureaucratic Approach
While scientific management was focusing on the interaction between workers and the task, me
researchers were studying how to structure the organization more effectively. Instead of trying to make
each worker more efficient, classical organization theory sought the most effective overall organizational
structure for workers and managers.
The theory's most prominent advocate, Max Weber, proposed a 'bureaucratic form' of structure, which he
thought would work for all organizations. Weber's idea! bureaucracy was , logical, rational and efficient.
He made the naive assumption that one structure would work best for all organizations.
1. Division of Labor
3. Unity of Command
4. Line of Authority
5. Centralization
6. Unity of Direction
7. Equity
8. Order
9. Initiative
10. Discipline
Hawthorne Studies
Even, as Taylor and Weber brought attention with their rational, logical approaches to more
efficient productivity, their views were criticized on the ground that both approaches ignored
worker's humanity.
The real beginning of applied research in the area of organizational behaviour started with
Hawthorne Experiments. In 1924, a group of professors began an enquiry into the human
aspects of work and working conditions at the Hawthorne plant of Western Electric Company,
Chicago. The findings of these studies were given a new name 'human relations' the studies
brought out a number of findings relevant to understanding human behaviour at work. The
Human element in the workplace was considerably more important. The workers are influenced
by social factors and the behaviour of the individual worker is determined by the group.
Hawthorne studies have been criticized for their research methods and conclusions drawn. But
their impact on the emerging field of organizational behaviour was dramatic. They helped usher
in a more humanity centered approach to work.
The human resources approach is concerned with the growth and development of people
towards higher levels of competency, creativity and fulfillment, because people are the central
resource in any organization. This approach help employees become better in terms of work
and responsibility and then it tries to create a climate in which they can contribute to the best of
their improved abilities. This approach is also known as 'supportive approach' because the
manager's primary role changes from control of employees to providing an active support for
their growth and performance.
Contingency Approach
Productivity is a ratio that compares units of output with units of input. It is often measured in
terms of economic inputs and outputs. Productivity is considered to be improved, if more
outputs can be produced from the same amount of inputs. But besides economic inputs and
outputs, human and social inputs and outputs also arc important.
Systems Approach
Organizations arc dependent upon their surrounding environment in two main ways:
First, the organization requires 'inputs' from the environment in the form of raw material, people,
money, ideas and so on. The organization itself can be thought of as performing certain
'transformation' processes, on its inputs in order to create outputs in the form of products or
services.
Secondly, the organization depends on environment such as, public to accept its output. The
systems view of organization thus emphasizes on the key interdependencies that organizations
must manage. Within themselves the organizations must trade off the interdependencies among
people, tasks, technology and structure in order to perform their transformation processes
effectively and efficiently. Organizations must also recognize their interdependence with the
broader environments within which they exist.
Challenges
• Challenges at the Individual Level
– Job Satisfaction
– Empowerment
– Behaving Ethically
• Challenges at the Group Level
– Working With Others
– Workforce Diversity
Workforce Diversity
An important watchword in the twenty-first century is workforce diversity—
The presence of differences based on gender, race and ethnicity, age, and able bodied ness.
Success in the new workplace requires a set of skills for working successfully with a broad
mix of People from different racial and ethnic backgrounds, of different ages and
genders, and of different domestic and national cultures. Valuing diversity is an OB theme.
It refers to managing and working with others in full respect for their individual differences.
Interpersonal sensitivity and cultural respect are indispensable to valuing diversity. Even
though valuing diversity is emphasized in books and classrooms, much remains to be
accomplished. A glass ceiling effect acts as a hidden barrier limiting the career advancement
of minorities and women in some situations. In a complex organizational environment,
different individuals with different educational backgrounds, races & different
professional/working skills work together. This leads to workforce diversity and OB needs to
manage it so that the above diversity does not offer obstacles towards growth of organization.
Pro side-
Yes they do because organizations are social systems and the care and feeding of people and
their relationships is crucial to the organizations being able to be effective
Con side
No, most organizations are social systems secondarily. Their first need is to be efficient and to
make money. Managers need to be plugged into the outside environment but minimizing
resources such as people is crucial to the success of the enterprise.
Text Questions
Q. 1. Define organizational bevaiour. What are various fields that have contributed to the field of
organizational behaviour? Explain their contributions.
Q. 2. Explain the field of organizational behaviour. Why the study is challenging?
Q.3 Define organizational behaviour. What are the approaches of OB?
Q.4 Define OB. Describe the nature and characteristics of OB. Why the study of OB is
necessary in the field of Management?
Q.5 Explain the field of OB. Why study is challenging? Do Successful Organization put people
first?