ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
does the Europeans were eclectic, open to new ideas, influences and
things? Also, he elaborates that western culture was not monolithic. It
states that different scholars raise questions about Indian science and
culture dignity. British Historian David Arnold in his book “Science,
Technology and medicine in colonial India” The scholar deeply
influenced by Indian scientific tradition. He eulogies Indian ancient
scientist and modern scientist comparing ‘HINDU’ tradition.
Since lots of scholars like Debi prasad
Chattopadhyay, Deepak Kumar, David Arnold, Dhruv Rana, Binod Bihari
already gave their priceless view about ancient and modern science in
India but they all have restricted to anatomy of scholars and innovation.
My aspect is does ancient scientist anyhow motivate the modern
scientist, if yes then what is the probable comparison of both era’s
innovation. My research answer lies above this question.
HYPOTHESIS: The research hypothesis will be relational between ancient
and modern. Although we find Indian science influence on Indian
cultural society but we move forward to contribution on world’s
scientific value. From Ancient to modern how India plays a crucial role
on in scientific field? How science and technology grow within a long
period of time? How much value of innovation put modern scholars
respected to ancient scholars? Are the innovative graphs going to the
upper front compared to ancient discovery? The myth of ancient science
value can be broken? The present study briefly elaborates those
hypotheses verify them and bring a clear picture about it.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: The problem already mentioned hypothesis
part. My first job is to design the project so I do the work seamlessly. To
integrate the information for my research I have to take help from
government surveys (Primary sources) also go some scientific institute
like Birla Industrial & Technological Museum, Bengal Chemist and
Pharmaceutical, Bose Institute so on and so forth. After getting the
particles and manuscript of those timeframes I will do qualitative
statistical analysis, verify the samples gathered and uncontrolled
variables and basis of further study I take some decision along with my
respected supervisor guidance what should be the base of study. And
last but not the least execute those variables and make a presentation
about the thesis. All of those characteristics will be followed under
descriptive/fundamental research method.
COMPARATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN INDIAN HISTORY