CompassGroup Annual Report2019
CompassGroup Annual Report2019
Strategic report
2 2019 performance at a glance
4 Our business at a glance
6 Our market position
7 Our sectors
8 Chairman’s statement
12 Our business model and strategy
14 How we create value
16 Our stakeholders
18 Chief Executive’s review
22 Executive Committee
26 Key performance indicators
28 Regional review
28 North America
30 Europe
32 Rest of World
34 Business review
41 Risk management
42 Principal risks
46 People report
54 Corporate Responsibility report
Corporate governance
64 Governance and Directors’ report
66 Chairman’s letter
68 Board of Directors
72 Corporate Governance
82 Audit Committee report
90 Corporate Responsibility Committee report
94 Nomination Committee report
98 Directors’ Remuneration report
122 Other statutory disclosures
Financial statements
130 Directors’ responsibilities
131 Independent auditor’s report
138 Consolidated financial statements
144 Group accounting policies
154 Notes to the consolidated financial statements
225 Parent Company financial statements
227 Parent Company accounting policies
229 Notes to the Parent Company financial statements
Shareholder information
232 Shareholder information
235 Notice of Annual General Meeting
Glossary
246 Glossary of terms
Consistent performance
UNDERLYING UNDERLYING UNDERLYING
REVENUE OPERATING PROFIT OPERATING MARGIN
1,882
25,152
1,744
1,705
23,147
7.4
7.4
7.4
22,852
7.2
7.2
30000 2000 8
1,445
19,871
1,296
17,843
7
25000
1500 6
20000
5
15000 1000 4
3
10000
500 2
5000
1
0 0 0
2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019
85.2p 40.0p
85.2
40.0
37.7
77.9
72.3
85.20 40
33.5
31.7
29.4
61.1
35
53.7
68.16
30
51.12 25
20
34.08 15
10
17.04
5
0.00 0
2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Throughout the Strategic Report, and consistent with prior years, underlying and other alternative performance measures are used to describe the Group’s
performance. These are not recognised under IFRS or other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Executive Committee of the Group manages
and assesses the performance of the business on these measures and believes they are more representative of ongoing trading, facilitate meaningful year on
year comparisons and hence provide more useful information to shareholders. Underlying and other alternative performance measures are defined in the
glossary of terms on pages 246 and 247. A summary of the adjustments from statutory to underlying results is shown in note 34 on page 208 and further detailed
in the consolidated income statement (page 138), reconciliation of free cash flow (page 143), note 2 segmental reporting (pages 161 to 164) and note 35
organic revenue and organic profit (page 210).
1,693
19,605
71.3
71.3
1,665
70.0
1,601
24878 2000 80
17,590
1,409
60.4
70
1,261
52.3
1500 60
50
1000 40
30
500 20
10
0 0 0
2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019
5 0.40 10
0.35
4 8
6.7
6.7
6.3
0.30
6.0
3 0.25 6
0.20
2 0.15 4
0.10
1 2
0.05
0 0.00 0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
2. The scope and methodology of our reporting has changed this year; therefore data is not comparable on a like for like basis.
For more information about our disclosure on global GHG emissions for the financial year ended 30 September 2019, see page 60.
NORTH AMERICA
Underlying revenue
£15,694m 62.4%
(2018 : £13,718m)
1
of Group total
EUROPE
Underlying revenue
£5,854m 23.3%
(20181: £5,762m) of Group total
REST OF WORLD
Underlying revenue
£3,604m 14.3%
(20181: £3,667m) of Group total
Significant structural
growth opportunity remains
We estimate that the addressable global food services market is
currently worth in excess of £200 billion. We are the leading global
food provider with around a 10% market share by sales. Approximately
75% of the market is serviced by regional players or in-house
providers, which means there is a significant structural growth
opportunity for us.
Large
players
Regional
ctu
players
r al
gr
th
ow
op
po
rtu
n it
y
The market for food services continues to offer significant growth experiences and outcomes. At the same time, our hospital retail
potential as we deliver a strong proposition across our core proposition makes life more comfortable for visitors.
sectors and regions.
Sports & Leisure is a highly outsourced sector in which we
Compass provides outsourced food services around the world benefit from our strong reputation across key markets.
in a market worth over £200 billion. The five sectors in which we
operate continue to offer substantial opportunities for growth. The Defence, Offshore & Remote sector offers opportunities to
build lasting strategic relationships with large local and
Food service remains at the core of the Compass offer. international operators. Creating strong client relationships
Business & Industry accounts for around 40% of this value, allows us to respond better to the complex needs of supporting
and this important sector continues to offer attractive growth their people. In addition to nutrition and physical wellbeing, our
opportunities. In more developed markets, where outsourcing solutions focus on the social, emotional and environmental
rates are routinely in excess of 60%, our combination of scale, needs of people working away from home.
efficiencies and best‑in‑class service delivery supports
continued revenue growth. In emerging markets, outsourcing Supplementing our core food offer with targeted support
rates are still only around 10%, providing a significant services is attractive in certain markets and sectors, such as
opportunity for future growth. Healthcare & Seniors and Defence, Offshore & Remote. In these
sectors, we are recognised for fulfilling the needs of clients who
The Healthcare & Seniors and Education sectors also continue require services with uncompromising quality.
to grow, with less than half of the addressable global market
currently outsourced. In Education, our expertise in nutrition In the markets and regions in which Compass operates, we
means we are able to provide delicious food which supports continue to build our business and reputation by focusing on our
learning at every stage of the education journey. In Healthcare, key strategic pillars of Performance, People and Purpose.
we work directly with healthcare providers to improve patient
Strategic Report
is key to meeting clients’ needs
The global food services market is large and disparate. That is why we
structure our business to match the sectors in which our clients operate so
that we get a deep understanding of their challenges. In this way, we can
create innovative, bespoke offers that meet their specific requirements and,
in doing so, truly differentiate ourselves.
7%
13%
SPORTS & LEISURE 39%
Operating at some of the world’s % of Group
most prestigious sporting and leisure underlying
18%
venues, exhibition centres, visitor
attractions and major events, we revenue
have an enviable reputation for
providing outstanding hospitality and
true service excellence.
23%
HEALTHCARE & SENIORS
We are specialists in helping hospitals in
the public and private sectors on their
journey of managing efficiency and
enhancing quality across a range of food
EDUCATION and some support services. We have an
increasing presence in the growing
From kindergarten to college, we provide
senior living sector.
fun, nutritious dining solutions that help
support academic achievement at the
highest levels. We educate young people
on how to have a happy, safe and healthy
lifestyle whilst contributing to a
sustainable world.
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
We have a strong commitment to corporate responsibility
and continue to build on this strength by working more
proactively with our clients and consumers. For example, on this
year’s Stop Food Waste Day, thousands of our people in 38
countries engaged with our customers to raise awareness of
ways to minimise food waste.
24.1%
offsetting weak volumes in Business & Industry. The Group
margin during 2019 was maintained despite this more -1.4%
challenging trading environment in Europe.
Last 24 months 32.2%
We are making good strategic progress through disciplined focus
on our Performance, People and Purpose priorities and have
31.7% 0.5%
continued to reshape our portfolio. Disposal proceeds have been Last 36 months 34.6%
reinvested in bolt-on acquisitions to further strengthen our food
service offer and subsector approach, and in June we 27.2% 7.4%
Paul Walsh
Chairman
26 November 2019
1. Pre IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. IFRS 16 will be adopted by the Group on 1 October 2019.
A differentiated approach
A BUSINESS MODEL FOR GROWTH
E
CO
Our people chain and diligently managing our food and labour costs through
our Management and Performance (MAP) framework.
in the market.
S
CIE
H IN
D
GE
CI E
Our organic revenue growth, the scale it creates and our focus
EN
VE ER A
AL
SC I
N
Our people lie at the heart of our business. Our aim is to nurture
an engaged and highly capable workforce to win new business,
manage our units efficiently and effectively, and deliver the
healthiest, most innovative food solutions in a way that provides
an exceptional experience to our clients and consumers.
FOCUS PRIORITISE
ON FOOD ORGANIC GROWTH
BEST-IN-CLASS
EXECUTION, QUALITY
AND INNOVATION
TARGETED
SELECT BOLT-ON
APPROACH TO
ACQUISITIONS
SUPPORT SERVICES
We use the Management and Performance (MAP) framework across the business.
Strategic Report
communities in which we operate. We seek to create value for all our stakeholders and aim to engage with them and take into
account their feedback to ensure (where possible) that we all benefit from Compass’ success.
Our Purpose pillar and the initiatives we pursue are focused on ENVIRONMENT
two cornerstones: safety as care and a renewed commitment We are championing initiatives that help the environment. In
to sustainability. 2017, Compass founded Stop Food Waste Day – an annual
global awareness programme which in 2019 reached 89 million
CONSUMERS & COLLEAGUES on social media and an estimated 10 million people through
Caring for each other allows us to strengthen our performance food waste engagement activities. We are considering other new
in occupational and food safety. This caring attitude, coupled initiatives around packaging and plastics that are better for the
with internal and external initiatives to tackle issues such as environment and are seeking to persuade our consumers to
mental health awareness, increasingly deliver value to both our adopt more sustainable behaviours, including plant-forward
colleagues and our consumers. We also have an opportunity to meals which are not only good from a nutritional perspective but
support these stakeholders in achieving healthier, more are better for the environment.
balanced lifestyles. The depth of expertise in the business allows
us to educate our consumers about health and wellness and, COMMUNITIES
through healthy menu offerings, encourage them to make better Our success depends on the support and inclusion of the vibrant
nutritional choices. local communities which surround us. We look to give back by
getting involved with community projects and initiatives that
SUPPLIERS benefit the local area.
Our supply chain integrity requirements ensure we are
supporting suppliers who share our values. We collaborate with See our CR report on pages 52 to 63 for more information about
our partners throughout the entire supply chain to deliver our Purpose initiatives.
sustainable, scalable and secure solutions for food and its
production. We source our food and non-food products in a
sustainable manner.
1. Pre IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. IFRS 16 will be adopted by the Group on 1 October 2019. The Group expects between £950 million–£1,050 million of additional debt
on its balance sheet on adoption.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2019 15
OUR STAKEHOLDERS
Our people Our communities Our clients Our consumers
Colleagues who work in The people who live in the local The businesses and The people to whom we serve
Description
our business. communities around our sites organisations for which we food and drink and provide
and operations. provide services around support services.
the world.
• engagement and teamwork • fair employment and equal • working within defined • delicious, safe and
• providing opportunities for opportunities sectors, creating bespoke, healthy food
development and growth • local causes and issues innovative solutions to match • staying ahead of changing
Areas of focus
ongoing success.We want our addressing issues that are ensure that our solutions are helps them learn better, work
people to thrive in a fair and material to our communities. tailored to support their better and recover better. We
inclusive work environment. To provide training opportunities individual business objectives. want our consumers to thrive
and support to local people and we create the environments
currently not in education, to help them do that, at all
training or employment. life stages.
There are many ways we We operate many local We aim to have open and We believe that engagement is a
engage, including engagement employment programmes to transparent relationships which constant conversation with our
surveys, town hall meetings, recruit and develop local people are based on honesty and consumers, listening carefully to
Speak Up reports, internal social to work in our sites. We partner respect. We build relationships how we can improve our service
How we engage
media channels and with local charities and at all levels of our client and find new ways to delight. We
consultative bodies. organisations to raise awareness organisations, sharing market use a variety of methods
and funds to help local causes. trends and insight, developing including formal surveys, social
strategic and operational plans, listening, comment cards,
against which we regularly workshops and observation. We
report. We hold independent combine analytical tools and
client surveys which measure common sense to get to
satisfaction levels. actionable insights into our
consumers’ preferences.
Strategic Report
sector operations. We are fortunate to serve a wide range of clients in our
Business & Industry, Healthcare & Seniors, Education, Sports & Leisure and
Defence, Offshore & Remote sectors. This means that we get valuable
insight into consumer needs at multiple different life stages, seeing first
hand what food habits each generation will take into the workplace. This
helps us partner with our clients to build future-proof solutions. It also means
we can translate insights and best practice between sectors, for example
taking learnings from our work on mental health with Offshore clients and
applying these to our Business & Industry clients who are increasingly
focused on health and wellbeing in the workplace.
Our suppliers Our shareholders NGOs Governments & regulators
Our trusted partners who source, Individuals or institutions that own Non-governmental organisations Regional and national government
produce and deliver products shares in Compass Group PLC. (NGOs) which support us with bodies and agencies who
and services. knowledge and expertise on key implement and enforce applicable
social, environmental and laws across our industry.
economic issues.
• food safety and authenticity • financial performance • human rights • consumer health and public
• workplace health and safety and strategy • climate change health policies
• supply chain integrity • competitive positioning • animal welfare • food safety
• human rights • outlook • social issues • workplace health and safety
• ethical business practice • human rights and
• sound governance climate change
and leadership • compliance with laws
and regulations
To develop mutually beneficial As owners of the business we rely To develop meaningful and To communicate our views to
and lasting partnerships aimed at on the support of our robust action plans on the key those who have the responsibility
addressing shared challenges in shareholders, and their opinions social, environmental and for implementing policy, laws
responsible and sustainable are extremely important to us. The economic issues that we can and regulations relevant to
sourcing, and to communicate our views of our major shareholders positively impact. our business.
supply chain standards, are reported to, and discussed by,
expectations and commitments. the Compass Group Board on a
regular basis.
Through a series of We have ongoing dialogue with Through a series of Through a series of industry
communications, interactions our investors through one-to-one communications, interactions and consultations, forums and
and formal reviews. In some of and group meetings, webcasts, regular meetings, industry forums conferences.
our larger markets we also host conference calls and at our AGM. and conferences.
regular multi-stakeholder The Group Investor Relations and
supplier conferences. Corporate Affairs Director has day
to day responsibility for investor
relations and the Group CEO and
Group CFO dedicate significant
time to engaging with our major
shareholders. During 2019 we
also conducted an investor survey.
We are the largest player in the global market. As we continue to These initiatives are often supported through technology and
grow and increase our scale, we further extend our competitive digital capability – both in terms of driving efficiencies and
advantage and our position as the most efficient provider. This optimising performance and also in developing products and
allows us to offer our clients and consumers the most exciting services which improve the consumer experience. Our digital
and innovative solutions, as well as the best value. The ability to strategy is implemented locally in the most cost effective and
innovate is important to ensure we meet our clients’ and relevant way for each market. We are making investment into
consumers’ rapidly evolving tastes and needs, and our systems and processes that will ultimately unlock more
decentralised structure means we are well placed to pilot efficiencies and leverage scale across the business in the
concepts in local markets before expanding across the Group long term.
where appropriate.
PEOPLE
By stepping up the intensity with which we manage the People are our biggest source of competitive advantage. They
business and with a disciplined focus on Performance, are the key to delivering excellent food service to our clients and
People and Purpose as our main strategic priorities, we are consumers together with strong financial results. We are in the
well placed to continue to create sustainable long term value process of further enhancing our employee proposition to ensure
for all of our stakeholders. we have an engaged, high performing, and fulfilled workforce
that truly reflects the diversity of the societies we live in and the
PERFORMANCE communities we serve.
Portfolio
To continue to drive our performance we are actively managing Our objective is to create an exceptional people business that is
our portfolio of businesses. Targeted and disciplined bolt-on inclusive, engaged and committed to developing our people and
acquisitions are an effective way to strengthen our capabilities, providing them with the safest and fairest environment in which
broaden our offering and increase our scale. M&A has also to work. We are launching initiatives and improving our
proven to be an extraordinary source of talent. During 2019 we processes to ensure we can:
invested £478 million, principally in North America. There
remains a good pipeline of bolt-on opportunities across • attract and develop the best leaders
the Group. • recruit, retain and develop the highest quality unit managers
in the industry
We have continued to make progress on our disposal • have the best and most inclusive work places in the world with
programme and during the year completed several disposals a fully engaged workforce, and
that bring cumulative revenues now disposed or exited to c. 3%
• have a diverse workforce that mirrors the communities in
of Group revenue at an average margin of c. 4%. As previously
which we operate
indicated, the overall programme of up to £1.2 billion revenues
is expected to be margin neutral. The programme will complete For example, in May we launched our unit manager
during 2020. development programme and to date around 2,000 unit
managers have participated in the tailored offsite programme.
MAP culture We also launched the Compass Commitments of Respect,
For over 10 years, we have used our Management and
Growth and Teamwork – what people can expect when they
Performance (MAP) framework to drive performance across
are part of our business. In October, we conducted a global
the business. It is a simple framework that we all use to help us
engagement survey to help us to identify areas where we
focus on a common set of business drivers, whether it is winning
need to take action to ensure people are experiencing
new business in the right sectors with the right terms (MAP 1),
our Commitments.
increasing our consumer participation and spend (MAP 2),
reducing our food costs (MAP 3), our labour costs (MAP 4) or
our overheads (MAP 5).
1. Pre IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. IFRS 16 will be adopted by the Group on 1 October 2019. The Group expects between £950 million–£1,050 million of additional debt
on its balance sheet on adoption.
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
Strategic Report
Appointed to the Executive Committee in April 2016, having joined the Appointed to the Executive Committee in December 2018, having joined
Group in February 2013. the Group in July 2011.
Key skills and competencies Key skills and competencies
Mark is highly experienced in international business leadership. He holds Through her varied career, Clare has developed a range of skills across
a Bachelor of Arts (Honours) in Business Administration and is a strategy, corporate finance and communications. She attended the
graduate of the Australian Institute of Company Directors. Corporate Affairs Academy at Said Business School, University of Oxford
Previous experience and has a BA in Modern History from The University of Bristol.
Mark held senior leadership roles for over 22 years in companies Previous experience
including LG Electronics, The Coca-Cola Company, Waterford Before joining Compass, Clare was Co-Head of the Industrials practice at
Wedgwood, Cinzano, Allied Lyons and Gillette. The majority of his career Finsbury, the strategic communications agency, and previously worked
has been spent in the service and consumer sectors with particular focus in corporate finance with J.P. Morgan Cazenove. Within Compass Clare
on the Asia Pacific region. held the role of Director of Communications before being promoted to
Group Director of Strategy and M&A in January 2017.
Measuring progress
We track our performance against a mix of financial and
non‑financial measures, which we believe best reflect our
strategic priorities of growth, efficiency and shareholder returns
underpinned by safe and responsible working practices.
KPI METRICS
Our strategic priorities are driven by our STRATEGIC FINANCIAL
goal to deliver shareholder value and we Organic revenue growth Underlying operating margin
use a number of financial KPIs to Organic revenue growth compares the Underlying operating margin divides
measure our progress. Growing the underlying revenue delivered from the underlying operating profit before
business and driving ongoing efficiencies continuing operations in the current share of profit after tax of associates
are integral to our strategy. The year with that from the prior year, by the underlying revenue.
importance of safety in everything we do adjusting for the impact of acquisitions,
is demonstrated by three non-financial sale and closure of businesses and Why we measure
performance indicators that we use exchange rate movements. The operating profit margin is an
across our business. important measure of the efficiency of
Why we measure our operations in delivering great food
The Group KPIs should be read in Our organic revenue performance and support services to our clients
conjunction with the Strategy and embodies our success in growing and and consumers.
Risk sections. retaining our customer base, as well
as our ability to drive volumes in
See pages 12 to 15 and our existing business and maintain
41 to 45 respectively. appropriate pricing levels in light
of input cost inflation.
6.4% 7.4%
6.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
5.8
7.2
7.2
6.4 8
5.5
5.0
7
4.0
6
5
4
3
2
1
0.0 0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019
Throughout the Strategic Report, and consistent with prior years, underlying and other alternative performance measures are used to describe the Group’s
performance. These are not recognised under IFRS or other generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Executive Committee of the Group manages
and assesses the performance of the business on these measures and believes they are more representative of ongoing trading, facilitate meaningful year on
year comparisons and hence provide more useful information to shareholders. Underlying and other alternative performance measures are defined in the
glossary of terms on pages 246 and 247. A summary of the adjustments from statutory to underlying results is shown in note 34 on page 208 and further detailed
in the consolidated income statement (page 138), reconciliation of free cash flow (page 143), note 2 segmental reporting (pages 161 to 164) and note 35
organic revenue and organic profit (page 210).
Strategic Report
ROCE divides the net operating profit Underlying basic earnings per share Measures cash generated by continuing
after tax (NOPAT) by the 12 month divides the underlying attributable profit operations, after working capital, capital
average capital employed. NOPAT is by the weighted average number of expenditure, interest and tax but before
calculated as underlying operating profit shares in issue during the year. acquisitions, disposals, dividends
from continuing operations less operating and share buybacks.
profit of non-controlling interests before Why we measure
tax, net of income tax at the underlying Earnings per share measures the Why we measure
rate of the year. performance of the Group in delivering Measures the success of the Group in
value to shareholders. turning profit into cash through the
Why we measure careful management of working capital
ROCE demonstrates how we have and capital expenditure. Maintaining a
delivered against the various investments high level of cash generation supports our
we make in the business, be it operational progressive dividend policy.
expenditure, capital expenditure or
bolt-on acquisitions.
1,247
85.2
1.141
77.9
72.3
25 85.20
20.3
20.2
1247.0
19.5
19.4
19.1
974
61.1
908
53.7
20 68.16 997.6
722
15 51.12 748.2
10 34.08 498.8
5 17.04 249.4
0 0.00 0.0
2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 20181 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
NON-FINANCIAL
Health and safety Food safety Environment
Global Lost Time Incident Global Food Safety Incident Rate GHG intensity ratio
Frequency Rate Cases of substantiated food safety GHG intensity ratio relating to the top 25
Cases where one of our colleagues is incidents, including food borne illnesses. countries, which represent 96% of Group
away from work for one or more shifts as a revenue. The scope and methodology of
result of a work related injury or illness. Why we measure our reporting has changed this year,
The Food Safety Incident Rate is a helpful therefore the data is not comparable on a
Why we measure measure of our ability to provide food that like for like basis. See page 60 for
A reduction in lost time incidents is an is safe and of the right quality to our more details.
important measure of the effectiveness of consumers globally.
our safety culture. It also lowers rates of Why we measure
absenteeism and costs associated with Since 2008, we have been measuring
work related injuries and illnesses. our carbon emissions to reduce our
impact on the environment and increase
operational efficiency.
5.0 0.400 10
0.375
4.4 8
6.7
6.7
6.3
0.350
6.0
3.8 0.325 6
0.300
3.2 0.275 4
0.250
2.6 2
0.225
2.0 0.200 0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
North America
Our North American business, which now accounts for over 60% the Atrium Health and Lexington Health Network, as well as
of Group revenue, delivered an excellent performance, with significant additional business with Tenet Healthcare.
organic revenue growth of 7.7%. Growth was driven by good
levels of new business and a strong retention rate across all Our Education sector reported strong net new business
sectors. As in previous years, around 40% of new business was including contract wins with New York University, Butler
from first time outsourcing, underlining the strong structural University and the Florence County Schools District.
growth opportunities within our largest market. Like for like
Our Sports & Leisure sector delivered a good organic
revenue growth benefited from pricing and positive trading
performance with an excellent retention rate and like for like
volumes from our Sports & Leisure sector.
volume growth. Contract wins include Allegiant Stadium, home
Strong growth in our Business & Industry sector was driven by to the Las Vegas Raiders, and the Lexington Convention Center.
continued good net new business and some like for like growth.
Underlying operating profit of £1,290 million increased by
New contract wins include the Canadian Imperial Bank of
9.0% (£106 million) on a constant currency basis. Ongoing
Commerce, American Airlines headquarters and Humana Inc.
efficiency initiatives resulted in modest underlying margin
Solid organic revenue growth in our Healthcare & Seniors sector progression for the year.
reflected good levels of new business. New contract wins include
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Underlying Change
2019 2018
1
Reported rates Constant currency Organic
Education – 22%
We have a passion for great food and creating inspiring dining choices for all our
customers throughout our companies in North America. Innovation is a key driver
across our business and is in everything we do, whether it’s technology, culinary or
initiatives in sustainability and supply chain management. We don’t stand still and
that’s the way we keep ahead of the competition.
We recognise that every client has unique food demands and that it will vary
significantly across the different sectors in which we operate. We provide them with
warm hospitality and excellent service, together with a wide variety of choice. Our
scale as the leading player in the market enables us to offer this at the lowest cost.
Europe
Organic revenue growth in Europe was 4.1% for the full year, Underlying operating profit declined on a constant currency
although growth slowed in the second half. This included strong basis by £26 million or 6.6%. The region delivered a good level of
growth from new business, notably the UK Defence contracts in organic revenue growth overall, supported by a strong
the first half and Puy du Fou in France in the fourth quarter, in performance in Sports & Leisure, where increased revenues
addition to strong trading in the Sports & Leisure sector. This tend to have a lower drop through to profit. Our focus on
was partially offset by lower volumes in Business & Industry efficiencies, pricing and portfolio management has only partially
across key markets where we have seen reduced participation offset the weakness in Business & Industry volumes (which
and lower consumer spend. declined significantly in the fourth quarter), cost inflation, and
the higher mobilisation costs (associated with the strong
Our new contract wins during the period include Landsec in the growth). In aggregate, the underlying operating margin declined
UK, Cercle National des Armées in Paris and Hôpitaux Robert by 60 basis points to 6.3%.
Schuman in Luxembourg. Contract extensions include Chelsea
Football Club in the UK.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Underlying Change
2019 20181
Reported rates Constant currency Organic
Education – 13%
Despite macro headwinds in Europe, I believe that there The UK is the Group’s second largest market, after the
are good opportunities to step up our performance in USA, and has had a good year in terms of growth, having
Continental Europe. The region has one of the most particularly benefited from increased volumes in our
experienced leadership teams in Compass Group, with excellent Sports & Leisure business. This included an
around 100,000 colleagues covering 21 countries. extension of our contract at Wimbledon, and operations at
Tottenham Hotspurs’ new stadium and Twickenham’s
As a team, we will be focusing equally on driving growth, redeveloped East Stand.
improving operating performance, and putting the best
people in place in leadership roles and in client units. I am Although Business & Industry has been more challenging
confident that we can deliver strong and sustainable results. due to recent macro and political uncertainty, this is a
key area of focus for us going forward. Based on our
market leading position, talented people and clear strategy
of delivering tasty and healthy food for our clients,
we have a strong platform for future success.
Rest of World
Organic revenue in our Rest of World region grew by 4.3%, As expected, our Offshore & Remote business returned to
including a strong performance in Turkey, India, Spanish growth in the second half of the year as we lapped the large
speaking LATAM and our Offshore & Remote business outside Australian construction project that moved to production
Australia, notably Kazakhstan. towards the end of 2018. Across the region we have continued
to win and retain contracts.
The Business & Industry and Education sectors of the region
continue to perform well and experienced good growth. New Underlying operating profit improved by 5.9% (£16 million)
business wins include Bloomberg in Hong Kong, Mercedes Benz on a constant currency basis, with the underlying operating
in Brazil and Bursa City Hospital in Turkey. We continue to retain margin improving in part due to portfolio management and
contracts including Victoria Zoos in Australia, Mondelez in implementation of pricing, purchasing and productivity
Argentina and Amazon in India. initiatives. We remain focused on best practice sharing and
driving efficiencies across the business.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Underlying Change
2019 20181
Reported rates Constant currency Organic
Education – 7%
Asia Pacific is a hugely exciting market for us, as it includes We have made good progress advancing our strategic
the more developed markets of countries like Australia and priorities of Performance, People and Purpose and are
Japan, where we have a very strong presence, and the high starting to see the benefits of this focus in our region.
growth economies of the emerging markets such as India For example, in Argentina we delivered strong growth and a
and China. good profit margin despite the challenging macroeconomic
environment. In Chile, where our mining sector is particularly
As these economies mature and the demand for outsourced strong, we are encouraged by significant wins in this sector.
quality food service propositions increases, we’re extremely
well placed to capitalise on the huge growth opportunities With regard to People, we welcomed eight new members to our
available in these markets based on our depth of expertise leadership team and put 700 of our unit managers through
and market positioning. leadership training. We have made important advances in our
Purpose agenda with all safety KPIs improving, largely due to a
commitment to preventative safety walks, and we partnered
with clients and local suppliers in Colombia and Brazil for
award-winning sustainable local sourcing programmes.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Increase/
2019 20181 (decrease)
Revenue
Underlying at constant currency 25,152 23,795 5.7%
Underlying at reported rates 25,152 23,147 8.7%
Statutory 24,878 22,872 8.8%
Organic growth 6.4% 5.5%
Total operating profit
Underlying at constant currency 1,882 1,798 4.7%
Underlying at reported rates 1,882 1,744 7.9%
Statutory 1,601 1,693 (5.4)%
Operating margin
Underlying at reported rates 7.4% 7.4% –
Profit before tax
Underlying at constant currency 1,772 1,681 5.4%
Underlying at reported rates 1,772 1,630 8.7%
Statutory 1,469 1,523 (3.5)%
Basic earnings per share
Underlying at constant currency 85.2p 80.4p 6.0%
Underlying at reported rates 85.2p 77.9p 9.4%
Statutory 70.0p 71.3p (1.8)%
Free cash flow
Underlying at reported rates 1,247 1,141 9.3%
Full year dividend per ordinary share 40.0p 37.7p 6.1%
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated upon adoption of IFRS 15.
Definitions of underlying measures of performance can be found in the glossary on pages 246 and 247.
1. Definitions of underlying measures of performance can be found in the glossary on pages 246 and 247.
2. Reconciliation between the different growth rates is provided in note 35.
3. Prior year comparatives have been restated upon adoption of IFRS 15.
Further details of the adjustments can be found in the consolidated income statement, note 2 segmental reporting and note 34
statutory and underlying results.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated upon adoption of IFRS 15.
Strategic Report
£388 million), equivalent to an effective tax rate of 23.3% The last date for receipt of elections for the DRIP will be
(20181: 23.8%). The rate reduction primarily reflects the full 3 February 2020.
year impact of the reduction in the US federal tax rate
introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, whilst the prior year Share buyback programme
comparative only includes nine months of benefit. The tax The Group did not buy any shares during the period under the
environment continues to be very uncertain, with more share buyback programme (2018: £nil). The directors’ authority
challenging tax authority positions and investigations globally. to purchase the Company’s shares in the market was renewed
Our current expectations are that the 2020 effective tax rate will by the shareholders at the Company’s Annual General Meeting
increase to around 24%. held on 7 February 2019.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated upon adoption of IFRS 15.
2. Pre IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. IFRS 16 will be adopted by the Group on 1 October 2019. The Group expects between £950 million–£1,050 million of additional debt
on its balance sheet on adoption.
2020 162
2021
2022 323
2023 442
2024 664 286
2025 250 324
2026 250
2027 243
2028 442
2029 300
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Strategic Report
interest rate in accordance with the policies set out below. number of currencies and its policy is to ensure that, in the short
term, it is not materially exposed to fluctuations in interest rates
The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash, borrowings, in its principal currencies. The Group implements this policy
receivables and payables that are used to finance the Group’s either by borrowing fixed rate debt or by using interest rate
operations. The Group also uses derivatives, principally interest swaps so that the interest rates on at least 80% of the Group’s
rate swaps, forward currency contracts and cross currency projected debt are fixed for one year. For the second and third
swaps, to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from year, interest rates are fixed within ranges of 30%–70% and
the Group’s operations. The Group does not trade in financial 0%–40% respectively.
instruments. The Group’s treasury policies are designed to
mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and GROUP TAX POLICY
exchange rates and to manage the Group’s financial risks. The As a Group, we are committed to creating long term
Board approves any changes to the policies. shareholder value through the responsible, sustainable and
efficient delivery of our key business objectives. This will enable
Liquidity risk us to grow the business and make significant investments in the
The Group finances its operations through cash generated by Group and its operations.
the business and borrowings from a number of sources including
the bank, the public and the private placement markets. The We therefore adopt an approach to tax that supports this
Group has developed long term relationships with a number of strategy and also balances the various interests of our
financial counterparties with the balance sheet strength and stakeholders including shareholders, governments, employees
credit quality to provide credit facilities as required. The Group and the communities in which we operate. Our aim is to pursue
seeks to avoid a concentration of debt maturities in any one a principled and sustainable tax strategy that has strong
period to spread its refinancing risk. commercial merit and is aligned with our business strategy.
We believe this will enhance shareholder value whilst protecting
In August 2019 the Group completed the refinancing of its Compass’ reputation.
Syndicated Revolving Credit Facility (SRCF). The new £2 billion
SRCF matures in August 2024 and replaces the £1 billion SRCF In doing so, we act in compliance with the relevant local and
and £690 million bilateral loans due to mature in June 2021 and international laws and disclosure requirements, and we conduct
December 2020 respectively. The new SRCF contains no an open and transparent relationship with the relevant tax
financial covenants. authorities that fully complies with the Group’s Code of Business
Conduct and Code of Ethics.
The maturity profile of the Group’s principal borrowings at
30 September 2019 shows that the average period to maturity In an increasingly complex international corporate tax
is 5.4 years (2018: 5.4 years). The Group’s undrawn committed environment, a degree of tax risk and uncertainty is, however,
bank facilities at 30 September 2019 were £2,000 million inevitable. Tax risk can arise from differences in interpretation
(2018: £1,690 million). of regulations, but most significantly where governments apply
diverging standards in assessing intragroup cross border
Foreign currency risk transactions. This is the situation for many multinational
The Group’s policy is to balance its principal projected cash organisations. We manage and control these risks in a proactive
flows by currency to actual or effective borrowings in the same manner and, in doing so, exercise our judgement and seek
currency. As currency cash flows are generated, they are used to appropriate advice from relevant professional firms. Tax risks
service and repay debt in the same currency. Where necessary, are assessed as part of the Group’s formal governance process
to implement this policy, forward currency contracts and cross and are reviewed by the Board and the Audit Committee on a
currency swaps are taken out which, when applied to the actual regular basis.
currency borrowings, convert these to the required currency.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The borrowings in each currency can give rise to foreign The Board takes a proactive approach to risk management with
exchange differences on translation into sterling. Where the the aim of protecting its employees and customers and
borrowings are either less than, or equate to, the net investment safeguarding the interests of the Group, its shareholders,
in overseas operations, these exchange rate movements are employees, clients, consumers and all other stakeholders.
treated as movements on reserves and recorded in the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income rather than The principal risks and uncertainties that face the business and
in the consolidated income statement. the activities the Group undertakes to mitigate these are set out
on pages 41 to 45.
Non-sterling earnings streams are translated at the average
rate of exchange for the year. Fluctuations in exchange rates RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
have given, and will continue to give, rise to translation Details of transactions with related parties are set out in
differences. The Group is only partially protected from the note 31 of the consolidated financial statements. These
impact of such differences through the matching of cash flows transactions have not had, and are not expected to have,
to currency borrowings. a material effect on the financial performance or position
of the Group.
GOING CONCERN In making this statement, the Board carried out a robust
The Group’s business activities, together with the factors likely assessment of the principal risks facing the Group, including
to affect its future development, performance and position are those that would threaten its business model, future
set out in the Business Review, as is the financial position of the performance, solvency or liquidity. The Board considers
Group, its cash flows, liquidity position, and borrowing facilities. annually and on a rolling basis a three year, bottom up strategic
plan. The output of this plan is used to perform central debt and
The Group has considerable financial resources together with headroom profile analysis, which includes a review of sensitivity
longer term contracts with a number of clients and suppliers to ‘business as usual’ risks, such as profit growth and working
across different geographic areas and industries. As a capital variances and severe but plausible events. It also
consequence, the directors believe that the Group is well placed considers the ability of the Group to raise finance and deploy
to manage its business risks successfully. capital. The results take into account the availability and likely
effectiveness of the mitigating actions that could be taken to
After making enquiries, the directors have a reasonable
avoid or reduce the impact or occurrence of the identified
expectation that the Group has adequate resources to
underlying risks.
continue in operational existence for the 12 months from the
date of approval of the Annual Report. For this reason, they While the review has considered all the principal risks identified
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the by the Group, the following were focused on for enhanced stress
financial statements. testing: health and safety, economic and political environment,
and clients and consumers. The geographical and sector
VIABILITY STATEMENT
diversification of the Group’s operations helps minimise the risk
In accordance with provision C.2.2 of the UK Corporate
of serious business interruption or catastrophic damage to our
Governance Code 2016, the directors have assessed the viability
reputation. Furthermore, our business model is structured so
of the Group over a three year period, taking into account the
that the Group is not reliant on one particular group of clients or
Group’s current position and the potential impact of the
sector. Our largest client constitutes only 2% of Group revenue
principal risks documented on pages 42 to 45 of the Annual
and our top 10 clients account for less than 8.5% of Group
Report. Based on this assessment, the directors confirm that
revenue. We are, as part of our strategy, always focussed on
they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be
productivity and purchasing initiatives which help us to manage
able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall
our cost base. In more adverse conditions, we can if necessary
due over the period to 30 September 2022.
take further radical action to reduce labour cost.
The directors have determined that a three year period to
While this review does not consider all of the risks that the Group
30 September 2022 is an appropriate period over which to
may face, the directors consider that this stress testing based
provide its viability statement. This is the period reviewed by the
assessment of the Group’s prospects is reasonable in the
Board in our strategic planning process and is also aligned to our
circumstances of the inherent uncertainty involved.
typical contract length (three to five years). We believe that this
presents the Board and readers of the Annual Report with a
reasonable degree of confidence over this longer term outlook.
Karen Witts
Group Chief Financial Officer
26 November 2019
Alison Yapp
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
26 November 2019
Strategic Report
The Board continues to take a proactive approach to There is still significant uncertainty about the potential
recognising, assessing and mitigating risk with the aim of withdrawal from the EU, the timeframe, the outcome of
protecting its employees and consumers and safeguarding the negotiations about future arrangements between the UK and the
interests of the Company and its shareholders. EU, and the period for which existing EU laws for member states
continue to apply to the UK. The Board views the potential
Risk management is an essential element of business impact of Brexit as an integral part of its principal risks rather
governance and, as set out in the Corporate Governance section, than as a stand-alone risk.
the Group has policies and procedures in place to ensure that
risks are properly identified, evaluated and managed at the We have identified a potential impact on our food supply chain in
appropriate level within the business. the UK relating to Brexit through potential increased import
costs from weaker sterling, compounded by potential new
The identification of risks and opportunities, the development import duties and tariffs, and on our labour force in the way of
of action plans to manage the risks and maximise the staff shortages and salary cost pressures.
opportunities, and the continual monitoring of progress against
agreed key performance indicators (KPIs) are integral parts of In addition, whilst significant changes to produce standards and
the business process and core activities throughout the Group. legislative requirements more generally are not anticipated in
the short term, they could impact the Group if introduced in
RISK GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK future. We are taking actions to assess and mitigate against any
The Group runs a formal risk management process, as part of impact of Brexit, including engaging with key suppliers and
which the Group’s Principal Risks (highlighted on pages 42 to wholesalers to identify Brexit readiness, stock levels, labour
45) are assessed and prioritised, with the Board having overall strategies and remediation plans.
responsibility for risk management.
Where possible, we seek to absorb price increases through
Risks are reviewed by country and regional leadership teams on operational efficiencies, and cost indexation in our contracts
an ongoing basis and are assessed to identify and document also gives us the contractual right to review pricing with
corresponding mitigating actions. Risk updates form an integral our clients.
part of periodic management reviews and are also reviewed by
other members of the Group’s senior leadership and the Group’s We are experiencing a challenging macroeconomic environment
Risk and Governance Committees. Additional reviews are in some of our regions and as a result, we are taking prompt
performed by Group Internal Audit. This bottom up and top action to ensure that we have the right sized labour model for
down approach provides awareness and agreement on key risks the future.
facing the Group.
The Group faces a number of operational risks on an ongoing
The Board reviews a Major Risk Assessment report, including basis such as litigation and financial (including liquidity and
principal risks and areas of emerging risks, which is formally credit) risk and some wider risks, for example, environmental
reviewed twice a year. and reputational. Additionally, there are risks (such as those
relating to the eurozone economy, pensions, and acquisitions
OUR PRINCIPAL RISKS and investments) which vary in importance depending on
The tables on pages 42 to 45 set out the principal risks and changing conditions.
uncertainties facing the business at the date of this Report and
any changes to the status of the risks since 2018. These have In accordance with the provisions of the UK Corporate
been subject to robust assessment and review. They do not Governance Code 2016, the Board has taken into consideration
comprise all of the risks that the Group may face and are not the principal risks in the context of determining whether to adopt
listed in any order of priority. Additional risks and uncertainties the going concern basis of accounting and when assessing the
not presently known to management or deemed to be less prospects of the Company for the purpose of preparing the
material at the date of this Report, may also have an adverse viability statement. The going concern and viability statements
effect on the Group. can be found on page 40 of the Strategic Report.
As a global business operating in countries and regions with All risks disclosed in previous years can be found in the annual
diverse economic and political conditions, the Group’s reports available on our website www.compass-group.com. We
operations and earnings may be adversely affected by political recognise that these risks remain important to the business and
or economic instability, including instability caused by the they are kept under review. However, we have focused the
implementation of the UK’s decision to exit the European Union disclosures on pages 42 to 45 on those risks that are currently
(EU) (Brexit). considered to be more significant to the Group.
PEOPLE
Recruitment Failure to attract and recruit people with the The Group aims to mitigate this risk by efficient, time critical
right skills at all levels could limit the success resource management, mobilisation of existing, experienced
2019 of the Group. employees within the organisation, improved use of
2018 technology such as apps and social media, and by offering
The Group faces resourcing challenges in training and development programmes.
some of its businesses due to a lack of
industry experience amongst candidates and
appropriately qualified people, and the
seasonal nature of some of our business.
Retention Retaining and motivating the best people with The Group has established training, development,
and the right skills, at all levels of the organisation, performance management and reward programmes to help
Motivation is key to the long term success of the Group. retain, develop and motivate our best people.
KEY
Purpose
People
Performance
Increased risk
Static risk
Bidding Each year, the Group bids for a large number A rigorous tender review process is in place, which
of opportunities. includes a critical assessment of contracts to identify
2019 potential risks (including social and ethical) and
2018 rewards, prior to approval at an appropriate level in
the organisation.
Service The Group’s operating companies contract with Processes are in place to ensure that the services
Delivery and a large number of clients. Failure to comply with delivered to clients are of an appropriate standard and
Contractual the terms of these contracts, including proper comply with the required contract terms and conditions.
Compliance delivery of services, could lead to the loss of
business and/or claims.
2019
2018
Competition We operate in a highly competitive marketplace. We aim to minimise this and to respond to new market
and The levels of concentration and outsource and consumer food services trends by continuing to
Disruption penetration vary by country and by sector. Some promote our differentiated propositions and by focusing
markets are relatively concentrated with two or on our strengths, such as flexibility in our cost base,
2019 three key players. Others are highly fragmented and quality, value of service and innovation.
2018 offer significant opportunities for consolidation and
penetration of the self-operated market. We are using our knowledge and experience and
continue to invest in technology which will help us to
Aggressive pricing from our competitors could counter any potential risk and to capitalise on the
cause a reduction in our revenues and margins. opportunities created.
Cost Inflation Our objective is always to deliver the right level of As part of our MAP framework and by sharing best
service in the most efficient way. An increase in the practice across the Group, we seek to manage inflation
2019 cost of labour, for example, minimum wages in the by continuing to drive greater efficiencies through menu
2018 USA and UK, or food, especially in countries such management, supplier rationalisation, labour scheduling
as Brazil, could constitute a risk to our ability to and productivity, and with the increased use of
do this. technology. Cost indexation in our contracts also gives
us the contractual right to review pricing with our clients.
Increases in inflation continue to intensify cost
pressures in some locations.
Political We are a global business operating in countries and The Group remains vigilant to future changes presented
Stability regions with diverse economic and political by emerging markets or fledgling administrations and we
conditions. Our operations and earnings may be try to anticipate and contribute to important changes in
2019 adversely affected by political or economic public policy.
2018 instability caused, for example, by the UK’s decision
to leave the EU. We are taking actions to assess and mitigate against any
impact of Brexit, including engaging with key suppliers
We have identified a potential impact on our food and wholesalers to identify Brexit readiness, stock levels,
supply chain in the UK relating to Brexit through labour strategies and remediation plans.
potential increased import costs from weaker
sterling, compounded by potential new import Where possible, we seek to absorb price increases
duties and tariffs, and on our labour force in the way through operational efficiencies, and cost indexation in
of staff shortages and salary cost pressures. our contracts also gives us the contractual right to review
pricing with our clients.
Political instability around the world remains a risk
as a result of geopolitical tensions. We are also working on our recruitment and retention
strategies to mitigate any impact on our labour supply.
International The international corporate tax environment As a Group, we seek to plan and manage our tax affairs
Tax remains complex and an increase in audit efficiently in the jurisdictions in which we operate. In doing so,
activity from tax authorities means that the we act in compliance with relevant laws and
2019 potential for tax uncertainties and disputes disclosure requirements.
2018 remains high. We note in particular the policy
efforts being led by the EU and the OECD We manage and control these risks in a proactive manner and
which may have a material impact on the in doing so exercise our judgement and seek appropriate
taxation of all international businesses. advice from reputable professional firms. Tax risks are
assessed as part of the Group’s formal governance process
and are reviewed by the Board and the Audit Committee on a
regular basis.
Information The digital world creates increasing risk for We continually assess our cyber risk and manage the maturity
Systems and global businesses including, but not limited to, of our enterprise infrastructure, platforms and security
Technology technology failures, loss of confidential data controls to ensure we can effectively defend against any
and damage to brand reputation through, for current or future cyber attacks.
2019 example, the increased and instantaneous
2018 use of social media. We also have in place appropriate crisis management
procedures to handle issues in the event of our defences
Disruption caused by the failure of key being breached. This is supported by using industry
software applications, security controls or standard tooling, experienced professionals and partners
underlying infrastructure could delay day and regular compliance monitoring to evaluate and mitigate
to day operations and management potential impacts.
decision making.
The Group relies on a variety of IT platforms to manage and
The use of sophisticated phishing and deliver services and communicate with our clients,
malware attacks on businesses has risen over consumers, suppliers and employees. Our decentralised
the last year with an increase in the number model and infrastructure helps to mitigate propagation of
of companies suffering operational disruption attacks across the Group's technology estate.
and loss of data.
We continue to be focused on the need to maximise the
effectiveness of our information systems and technology as a
business enabler and have increased our investment in
technology and people to strengthen our platforms and
enhance our cyber security defences to mitigate the risk of
technology failure and data loss.
During the last year we placed increasing focus and resources DEVELOPING OUR UNIT MANAGERS
on those parts of our People agenda which we believe create the To provide the best service for our customers, we need to help our
culture and leadership which gives us our competitive edge. unit managers develop their own skills and grow the skills of their
teams. This year, we launched our global unit manager
Our areas of focus remain recruiting and developing the very development programme, Leadership in Action, which focuses on
best leaders, having the most talented unit managers in our creating positive working environments in units and helping
sector, and building engaging and inclusive environments in managers lead their teams even more effectively.
which every member of our team can be their best by being
themselves at work. This is a global programme which is being delivered in every
country in the Group. Since its launch in May 2019, around
We have continued to improve the quality of leadership in the 2,000 unit managers have participated in the two day face to face
business by raising the standards of assessment and onboarding training programme in their home country and local language.
of new entrants and promotees to our global leadership team. By the end of next year, we anticipate that approximately
This ensures that only individuals of the highest calibre join our 10,000 unit managers will have attended the course, which
most senior leadership population. represents around a quarter of the unit managers in Compass.
We remain committed to developing our teams and supporting This programme makes a major contribution to the development
their career progression through the business. We continue of one of our key populations and further underpins our focus on
to enhance the diversity balance of our most senior teams, people at all levels.
and have increased year on year the proportion of roles being
filled by women.
2017 11%
2018 25%
2019 38%
Under our Culture pillar, we have continued to focus on creating
GLOBAL LEADERSHIP TEAM: FEMALE an inclusive and welcoming environment for all. We began our
rollout of an unconscious bias training workshop, starting with
2017 28% the Executive Committee and cascading the session through a
2018 30% number of country leadership teams. During 2020, we will
2019 31% continue to roll out this training across the business. The
importance of inclusion is also a core component of our
SENIOR MANAGEMENT : FEMALE 2
Leadership in Action programme so we ensure a consistent
message is heard across our business.
2017 24%
2018 26% Incorporating a set of inclusion related questions into the
2019 27% engagement survey gives us the data to track our progress
towards an ever more inclusive workplace. By combining core
1. The percentages disclosed for 2019 are stated as at 30 September 2019. biographical details and answers to key questions related to
2. Senior management is defined as our global leadership team and inclusion, we will be able to identify locations where colleagues
statutory directors of corporate entities whose financial information is
consolidated in the Group’s accounts in this Annual Report. See page require more support to create more inclusive environments as
125 for more details. well as those with great practices to share.
50 Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2019
Strategic Report
OUR VALUES GUIDE OUR ACTIONS
AND BEHAVIOURS
During 2019, we have worked closely with our clients, STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
consumers and partners to deliver healthy, nutritious food, As a responsible business, we regularly engage with our
reduce food waste, raise awareness of healthy eating, advocate stakeholders. We ensure that we stay up-to-date on issues that
more responsible sourcing and much more. matter most to our different stakeholder groups, to us as a
business, and to our industry. Our stakeholder groups include
Compass Group supports the United Nations’ Sustainable our clients, consumers, colleagues, suppliers and shareholders,
Development Goals (UNSDGs) and our sustainability strategy is as well as the communities in which we operate. We also engage
aligned with several of the goals. See pages 62 and 63 for further with a number of not-for-profit organisations with expertise in
details on our commitment to the UNSDGs. different segments of the food supply chain.
We report to a number of sustainability indices including We respect feedback from all our stakeholder groups and take
the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices and the Carbon their views into consideration in our decision-making processes.
Disclosure Project.
For more information about our engagement with our
stakeholders, please see pages 16 and 17.
Visit our website at www.compass-group.com for more information about our approach to CR and sustainability
Our 2019 Sustainability Report will be available online in early 2020
Higher Local
Communities
impact Food & People
Safety
Single-Use
Food Waste
Medium Plastics
impact Energy
Use
Employee
Sourcing Health Talent Attraction/
Importance to stakeholder
Responsibly Development
Lower Healthy
Diversity and
impact Supply Chain
Inclusion Lifestyle
Integrity Human
Rights
Climate Nutrition
Adaptation
Mental
Health
Water
Packaging Plant
forward
Biodiversity
Safety Environment
SUSTAINABILITY PRIORITIES
HEALTH AND WELLBEING ENVIRONMENTAL GAME CHANGERS BETTER FOR THE WORLD
Nutrition, health and happiness Targeted action where we can make Driving positive impact far
at the heart of our value proposition an enhanced impact beyond our business
SAFETY CULTURE
Turning safety from compliance
to caring for each other
-35% -18%
practices, not because someone else is telling them to but
because they care about each other.
Sadly, during the year there were two fatalities in the Group, an (since 2015) (since 2015)
incident in our South African business and a road traffic
accident in our USA business. In each instance, a full
1,788
1,749
1,473
-38% -33%
(since 2015) (since 2015) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Sharing learning
Our health and safety experts all around the world are often
4,167
4,100
dealing with similar issues. During the year we held two safety
3,528
2,766
support each other. Key priorities for our safety agenda were
discussed and the strategic direction set alongside the creation
of a library of resources.
HEALTH AND WELLBEING In the Netherlands, our 360 Lifestyle digital platform provides
Helping our consumers eat and live advice from experts in the fields of nutrition, lifestyle, mind and
sport. This helps people to understand the nutritional values of
well is key to our social purpose the products in our restaurants, as well as how to prepare
With our scale and scope we can help consumers make healthy meals at home, and live healthier lives.
healthier choices. We have a large team of nutritionists and
We also help our clients to introduce healthy living programmes
dieticians who continually work with clients and consumers
into their operations. For example, in January 2019, at a large
across various geographies to ensure we serve healthy options
insurance company client in North America, Eurest launched
and encourage healthier lifestyles.
its first certified Wellness Center for Excellence. The team
Better nutrition choices promote wellness programmes and new, healthy food options
Our teams work hard to improve the culinary offer by responding each month.
to consumer feedback as well as running pilots, ad hoc research
Mental health
and teaching kitchens on nutrition. For example, we conducted
We believe that protecting the mental health of employees
a study in a school in the UK to improve take up of healthy
should be a priority for all responsible businesses. Our goal is to
options through messaging and investigated the use of choice
provide supportive and understanding work environments for
architecture or ‘nudges’ of behaviour to encourage students to
our people, helping them to identify and address stress, anxiety
make the healthier choice. Raising awareness of healthy eating
and depression.
resulted in a 25% increase in the uptake of oily fish.
In 2019, we launched four pilots (three in the UK and one in
In India, our Stealth Health programme has replaced over
Australia) with Medibio, the first data driven, biometric, mental
70 customers’ favourites with healthier – yet still delicious –
health monitoring and management programme in the world.
alternatives (for example using complex carbohydrates instead
The results so far have been encouraging in helping our people
of white rice). In Germany, we introduced a new range of no
manage their mental health proactively and we are planning
sugar and no sweetener desserts, using natural ingredients like
more pilots during 2020.
fresh fruit, Greek yoghurt and vegan alternatives, and
superfoods like chia, quinoa and goji berries. Similarly, in In the UK, we sponsor a mental health awareness magazine
Denmark we introduced small, plated portions in our called MindSet, which is available in print and online, offering
unrestricted buffets, which in some cases led to a 50% decrease advice, signposting and support covering a range of mental
in quantities consumed. health issues.
Healthy lifestyle
In 2019, we introduced further initiatives to promote
healthy lifestyles.
Compass Australia won the Mines and Metals Association Mental
For example, in the UK, our Nourished Life website
Health Award 2019 for its continuing efforts in mental health,
(www.nourishedlife.co.uk) and related social media channels
such as its awareness and listening campaign #gotyourback.
offer tips for healthier living, including better sleep, recipes,
and an ‘ask our experts’ column. This website won Footprint
Media’s Health & Vitality Honours Award for Communication
and Engagement.
In Norway, we undertook a study to analyse hospitality waste, We are working directly with our clients, procurement
the results of which have been used across the Nordics to teams and suppliers to help reduce our use of disposable
further reduce food waste. In Germany, we are working with plastic items. This is helping to ensure that fewer single-use
United Against Waste to assess and analyse sites’ food waste to plastics are being used, replacing them with reusable or
reduce it on a site by site basis. Across a number of our biodegradable alternatives.
countries, including the UK, Netherlands and China, we use
Winnow technology to measure, monitor and reduce food waste In some sites, we distribute reusable containers such as
across large sites. In Turkey, we have found that by giving coffee mugs and lunch boxes, thus reducing plastic cups
consumers the ability to choose portion sizes we have been able and boxes from sites. In Brazil, for example, giving our people
to cut food waste by between 6% and 20% at some restaurants. their own mug led to a 60% reduction in disposable cup use;
similarly, Compass Turkey replaced 95% of non-recyclable
Stop Food Waste Day cardboard cups with reusable glassware in only seven months.
In 2017, in the USA we sought to raise awareness of the food
waste crisis by creating a day of action, Stop Food Waste Day. It The UK & Ireland business is a key partner of the charity The
has now become an annual global event. Waste and Resources Action Programme and, together with
multinational businesses, governments and charities, has
committed to the UK Plastics Pact to reduce plastics use in the
UK. Commitments include eliminating unnecessary single-use
packaging, increasing recycling and improving reusability
of packaging.
6.7
the coming year. 6
Compass Group’s disclosure in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013
is stated in the table below and is incorporated in the Directors’ Report by reference on pages 78 and 125:
Global GHG emissions for the period 2018-2019 2017-2018
1 October 2018 to 30 September 2019 Unit Current reporting year* Previous year
Combustion of fuel & operation of facilities (Scope 1) Tonnes (t) CO2e 174,627 129,516
Electricity, heat, steam and cooling purchased for own
use (Scope 2 – location based) tCO2e 45,875 8,095
Total Scope 1+2 tCO2e 220,502 137,611
Emissions intensity per £M revenue tCO2e/£M 9.1 6.3
** In 2019, we increased the scope and changed the data collection and estimation methodology of reporting.
This year, we conducted a thorough review of our Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint following our commitment to set best-in-
class Science Based carbon reduction targets aligned to the Science Based Target initiative criteria. This has led us to expand
our reporting boundary of greenhouse gas emissions to more closely reflect our operations. Our GHG emissions calculations
are based on the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition). Applying an operational
control approach, we have identified relevant activity data for Scope 1 and 2 emissions and have used the location based
Scope 2 calculation method. The majority of our Scope 1 emissions are from vehicles within our operating fleets. Our Scope 1
and 2 emissions have been verified by an independent carbon consultant.
Strategic Report
we receive from our local communities across the world. We
make a positive contribution on a want to continue giving back to these communities. We do this
global level, working with thousands of local by partnering with market-based charities and getting involved
communities and suppliers, and hundreds of with projects and initiatives that benefit the local area.
partners around the world For example, in Australia we work with indigenous owned and
Our priority is to ensure we partner with known suppliers who operated businesses, and have been actively increasing the
meet our high standards of food quality, animal welfare, number of these suppliers and the amount we purchase from
sustainability and ethical trade. Our global supply chain integrity them; in 2018, we increased spend by 30%. In Canada, we
requirements ensure that we work only with suppliers who share launched our Buy Local programme in 650 education campuses
our values. Our Code of Business Conduct, available on our and schools across the country. The programme offers quality-
website, outlines what we expect of all of our partners. assured, fresh, locally sourced food from community-based,
local vendors.
Animal welfare
All of our operations around the world are aiming to source Compass Colombia has been promoting prosperity in post-
100% cage-free shell eggs and liquid egg products by 2025. In conflict zones by partnering with charities including Prodeco and
our US business over the last year, 40% of our total egg Vital Corporation to work closely with local producers. Buying
purchase (both shell and liquid) was certified cage free. more locally and through cooperatives allows the farms to
produce on demand rather than with seasonality, reducing food
We have been assessed by the Business Benchmark on Farm waste and enabling access to collaborative tools to improve their
Animal Welfare (BBFAW) since its inception in 2012. In 2019, operations, as well as helping enhance the local economy.
we are pleased to have maintained our Tier 3 ranking.
In Denmark, our cafeterias have been cooking hot meals
for homeless people. We partner with the Disability Employment
Service in Australia to offer jobs to those less able bodied.
Working with a large financial services client we launched a
Redemption Roasters unit in the UK, to help rehabilitate
ex-offenders.
In 2019, we signed up to the 2026 European Chicken
Commitment of higher welfare standards for 100% of the For several years, Eurest in Norway have collaborated with
chicken meat we source for Europe, following a similar The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration to hire
commitment by our US business in 2016. people who have been left out of the labour market. Through a
trainee programme, the candidates get to test and develop their
Deforestation skills in several different professions to find the right job match
We know that sourcing particular foods can impact on for their future.
deforestation and desertification of the planet. We are
committed to preventing this and actively seek to reduce our Collaborating for big change
sourcing of products such as soy or beef that contribute to this, As the biggest player in our industry, we have the expertise to
such as those from the Amazon biome. We are active members help shape positive change on food focused issues. And, as a
of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and the Round Table global business, we recognise the vital importance of working
on Responsible Soy. together with our clients, suppliers and other stakeholders to
find solutions to these challenges.
2.1 End hunger and ensure access to safe, Every year, we spend around £6 billion on food. Where we have surplus
nutritious and sufficient food food, we can play a role in helping the wider community to tackle food
insecurity through donation programmes. Through initiatives like Farm to
2.4 Ensure sustainable food production and Fork in the USA, and Buy Social Corporate in the UK, we promote local
resilient agriculture sourcing and positive agricultural practices.
3.4 Reduce premature mortality through By pursuing our passion for wellbeing and nutrition, through projects
prevention and treatment and promote around healthy eating and mental health such as teaching kitchens,
mental health and wellbeing awareness raising and mental health first-aid training, we are committed to
helping and supporting our consumers and colleagues to adopt and enjoy a
balanced lifestyle.
5.5 Ensure women’s full and effective Women are a driving force in our business. We aim to empower all our
participation and equal opportunities for female colleagues, promote women-led suppliers and run many women’s
leadership at all levels of decision making development and training schemes. We are a lead supporter of WiH2020, a
cross-industry initiative dedicated to increasing women’s representation in
leadership positions across the hospitality, travel and leisure sectors.
8.5 Achieve full and productive employment Our people are fundamental to our great service and reputation. Around the
and decent work for all women and men, world we are working with local communities to offer fair and safe
including for young people and persons employment and great career opportunities. We run diversity and inclusion
with disabilities, and equal pay for work of action councils and many programmes to promote work for all. We work
equal value with our operations and suppliers to address human rights and modern
slavery risks and conduct audits and provide training.
8.7 Take active measures to eradicate
forced labour, end modern slavery and
human trafficking and end child labour in all
its forms
12.3 Halve per capita global food waste We are committed to halving food waste by 2030 and are actively reducing
by 2030 waste through measurement and targeted actions across all regions.
12.5 Reduce waste generation through Through environmental management systems at client sites, as well as
prevention, reduction, recycling and reuse education and toolkits, we encourage environmental stewardship and
waste reduction through prevention, recycling and reuse. In 2019, we
12.6 Adopt sustainable practices and launched a comprehensive sustainability reporting system gathering
integrate sustainability information thousands of data points across our business to measure and report on our
into reporting sustainability efforts.
13.3 Improve capacity on climate change In 2019, we committed to setting Science Based Targets to do our part in
mitigation, adaptation and impact reduction limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.
14.1 Prevent and reduce marine pollution We are committed to reducing single-use plastics across our business
which can end up in waterways. We have taken great strides in this area,
14.C Enhance the conservation already removing millions of plastic straws, cutlery and more.
and sustainable use of oceans and
their resources We continue to promote sustainable and responsibly sourced seafood and
have a growing number of restaurants certified sustainable by the Marine
Stewardship Council. Our policy is not to serve fish from the Marine
Conservation Society ‘fish to avoid’ list.
15.1 Ensure the sustainable use of terrestrial We are working across our global supply chain to ensure we source our food
and inland freshwater ecosystems and non-food products in a sustainable manner with the least possible
impact on the environment.
15.2 Promote the implementation of
sustainable management of all types of Through our membership of the Round Table on Responsible Soy and the
forests, halt deforestation Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and increasing our purchase of
certified sustainable palm oil, we aim to halt deforestation and promote
responsible environmental practices throughout our supply chain.
17.16 Enhance the global partnership for As a global business, we recognise the importance of working in partnership
sustainable development, complemented by with our clients, suppliers, NGOs and other stakeholders to improve the
multi stakeholder partnerships that mobilise positive contribution that we can make to help address some of the biggest
and share knowledge, expertise, technology issues that we face in the 21st century. In 2019, we signed a global
and financial resources, to support the partnership with the EAT Forum and we are working with the Ellen
achievement of the goals MacArthur Foundation to help promote sustainable diets and a circular
economy for food.
MEMBERSHIP AND ATTENDANCE As a Board, we are responsible for setting the ‘tone from the top’
Member Eligible Meetings and for championing a healthy, responsible corporate culture
Member since to attend1 attended which promotes the long term sustainable success of the
Paul Walsh Jan 2014 6 6 Company for the benefit of all of our stakeholders.
Carol Arrowsmith Jun 2014 6 6
John Bason Jun 2011 6 6 Culture and values
Our corporate culture defines who we are, what we stand for and
Dominic Blakemore Feb 2012 6 6
how we do business. Compass’ history and its culture have been
Stefan Bomhard May 2016 6 6
founded on the principle that strong governance makes sound
John Bryant Sep 2018 6 6 business sense. Our good reputation has been built on our
Gary Green Jan 2007 6 6 resolve to maintain the highest ethical and professional
Anne-Francoise Nesmes Jul 2018 6 6 standards at all times, underpinned by a well-defined and
Nelson Silva Jul 2015 6 6 effective system of governance.
Johnny Thomson2 Dec 2015 1 1
As a services business, our people are our greatest asset and we
Ireena Vittal Jul 2015 6 6
recognise and understand the value of recruiting and developing
Karen Witts3 Apr 2019 3 3
the best people. By living our values, our people differentiate us
from our competitors, helping us to attract new business and
1. The maximum number of meetings that a member was eligible
to attend. retain our existing clients. It is therefore important that all of our
2. Stepped down from the Board and its committees on people understand the importance of our values and the role
31 December 2018.
3. Appointed to the Board and its committees on 8 April 2019. they play in our distinctive, delivery focused culture.
Governance
Stakeholder engagement Succession Planning and diversity
We remain committed to building on our existing legacy of strong Succession planning continues to be an area of focus for the
governance in support of our corporate performance and social Board and the Nomination Committee and we are pleased with
purpose so that we continue to benefit from the confidence and the progress of the Group’s diversity and inclusion agenda. We
support of our shareholders. recognise that the Board sets the tone for diversity across the
Group and that it is important that we should have a diverse
We have a global and diverse community of stakeholders that leadership to support good decision making. The appointment of
includes clients, consumers, employees, suppliers and Karen Witts during the year increased female representation on
shareholders as well as the communities in which we operate. the Board to 36%. The Board supports the targets set by the
We respect the views of all our stakeholders and seek to engage Hampton-Alexander Review with regard to gender diversity.
with them and take their feedback into account, incorporating it These will continue to be considered in the succession planning
where we can, to help inform our decision making processes. process and we are confident that initiatives taking place across
More details of how we engage with our stakeholders can be Compass to help identify the leaders of the future will lead to
found on pages 16 and 17 and page 80. greater diversity within our senior management. We have
continued to strengthen our approach to talent management
During the year, we actively sought to engage with a number
and succession planning at a senior level, more details of which
of our shareholders who had voted against the re-election of
can be found in the People Report on pages 46 to 51. This is a
Ireena Vittal at the Company’s AGM on 7 February 2019. The
subject which continues to command the Board’s full attention
dialogue was initiated to better understand voting decisions
and it is reflected in the appointments that were made to
around perceived overboarding in respect of Mrs Vittal’s other
the Executive Committee during the course of the year.
non-executive directorships.
Biographies of the Executive Committee members can be
The Board carefully considered their views; however we strongly found on pages 24 and 25.
believe that Mrs Vittal has been, and continues to be, an
We will continue to assess Board and senior executive
effective independent non-executive director for Compass
succession planning to ensure we maintain an appropriate
Group PLC, who brings a breadth of knowledge, skills, cultural
combination of skills, experience and knowledge to deliver our
and personal experiences combined with a unique perspective,
strategy, and to ensure that plans are in place for orderly
which is beneficial in boardroom debates. We believe that
succession to the Board and senior management positions.
Ireena’s other mandates on four Indian boards are significantly
less onerous than those of UK companies on the basis that they THE YEAR AHEAD
hold fewer meetings in each case and the majority of meeting We are committed to doing things in the right way and will
sets are concluded within a single day. We are satisfied with her continue to strengthen our governance processes over the
attendance and believe that she devotes appropriate time to her coming year to ensure that we are aligned with best practice and
role at Compass, bringing valuable insights to our debates and the 2018 Code and that our approach to disclosure remains
contributing to Board diversity. understandable and transparent.
As a measure of our confidence in Mrs Vittal, she has been We look forward to meeting with you at our upcoming AGM,
chosen to perform the role of designated Non-Executive Director which will be held at Twickenham Stadium at 10.30am on
for workforce engagement to help us better understand the Thursday 6 February 2020.
views of our workforce. Ireena will undertake the role for
a period of two years from 1 October 2019 and, at the end of
that term, will be succeeded by one of her non-executive
colleagues. More details of this initiative can be found on
page 51.
1 2
4 5 6
Governance
7 8
11
9 10 12
Governance
ANNE-FRANCOISE NESMES NELSON SILVA
Non-Executive Director Non-Executive Director
A C N R A C N R
Appointed to the Board in July 2018. Appointed to the Board in July 2015.
Key skills and competencies Key skills and competencies
Anne-Francoise has a wealth of experience in finance and Nelson has considerable executive management experience in a variety
accounting gained in international organisations with a strong focus of senior leadership roles within major international companies, with a
on strategy, M&A and governance. Anne-Francoise is a chartered particular focus on Brazil.
management accountant. Current external appointments
Current external appointments Non-executive director of Cosan Limited and an advisor to Appian Capital
Chief Financial Officer, Merlin Entertainments plc and a director of Merlin Advisory LLP and HSB Solomon Associates LLP.
Entertainments plc's subsidiary companies: Sea Life Trust Limited, Previous experience
Merlin Entertainments Share Plan Nominee Limited, Merlin’s Magic Nelson was formerly an executive director of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. and
Wand Trustees Limited and Sea Life Trustees Limited. President of the Aluminium business unit at BHP Billiton, based in the
Previous experience UK. Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Nelson held a number of senior
Prior to joining Merlin, Anne-Francoise was the Chief Financial Officer of positions at Vale, including Sales and Marketing Director based in
Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC and also held a number of senior finance Belgium, Japan and Brazil. Nelson was also Managing Director of
roles during her 16 year tenure at GlaxoSmithKline. Embraer for Europe and Africa, based in France, and Chief Executive
Officer of All Logistica in Argentina.
Nelson previously held the position of Senior Vice President of BG
Group plc responsible for Brazil, Bolivia and Uruguay. He is a former
board member of the Brazilian Institute of Oil and Gas, the Brazilian
Association of Petroleum Companies and of the Social and
Development Council of Brazil’s Presidency. Nelson was formerly a
senior consultant to BHP Billiton Brazil and a board member of the
Brazilian Symphonic Orchestra.
36%
9% 9% 33%
27%
18% Compass
45%
Hampton-Alexander 2020 target
28% 64%
> 5 years Non-Executive Chairman
3-5 years Non-Executive
1-3 years Executive
< 1 year
6
18% 18% 12% 11%
11
6%
7
7% 16%
7
11
11 64% 29% 19%
Health, safety and sustainability North America
Business and operational review
International/specialist region Europe
knowledge experience Strategy
Rest of World
Sector experience Financial review including tax, treasury
Financial and accounting expertise Sector/Regional Business Reviews
Strategy/M&A M&A and Cap Ex
Corporate/operational leadership Risk
Governance and IR
HOW THE BOARD GOVERNS THE COMPANY Counsel and Company Secretary and can also be found at
The Board leads the Group’s governance structure. It is www.compass-group.com. Terms of reference are reviewed
responsible for setting the strategic targets for the Group, annually by their respective committees and updated when
monitoring progress made, approving proposed actions and necessary to reflect changes in legislation or best practice.
for ensuring that the appropriate internal controls are in place The matters reserved for the Board and the terms of reference
and that they are operating effectively. The Board is assisted of the principal committees were thoroughly reviewed
by four principal committees (Audit, Corporate Responsibility, and updated in the year under review and can be found
Nomination and Remuneration), each of which is responsible at www.compass-group.com.
for reviewing and dealing with matters within its own terms
of reference. Directors who are not members of individual Board committees
may be invited to attend one or more meetings of those
The minutes of all Committee meetings are circulated at committees during the year.
scheduled Board meetings.
The Chairman of each of the principal committees attends the
The Company also has a number of executive management AGM to respond to any shareholder questions that might be
committees (Disclosure, Executive and General Business). raised on committee activities. The Group General Counsel and
These have been established in order to consider various Company Secretary acts as Secretary to all Board Committees.
matters for recommendation to the Board and its principal
committees or to deal with day to day matters within the Our governance structure is supported by the Group’s
authority granted by the Board. The formal terms of reference standards, policies and internal controls, which are described
for the principal committees, approved by the Board and in more detail over the following pages.
complying with the Code, are available from the Group General
Governance
governance matters, including payment of Chairman also held meetings with investors. structures in place
are maintained
and overseen by
the Executive
Committee, which
THE BOARD Company’s long and short term plans. The Group is led by the Group
The Board is responsible for the performance and CEO acts as a direct liaison between the Board CEO and
long term success of the Company, including and management. comprises
health and safety, leadership, strategy, values, the executive
standards, controls and risk management. SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR directors, regional
The role of SID is to provide a sounding board for managing
CHAIRMAN the Chairman and to serve as an intermediary for directors and
The Chairman is responsible for the leadership of other directors and shareholders where necessary. other members
the Board and for ensuring there is effective of senior
debate and challenge. COMPANY SECRETARY
management,
The Company Secretary is responsible for
whose biographies
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ensuring good information flow to the Board
are on pages 24
The Group CEO’s role entails being ultimately and its committees and between senior
and 25.
responsible for day to day operational management and the non-executive directors;
management decisions and for implementing the and for advising the Board, through the Chairman,
on governance matters.
BOARD COMMITTEES
Corporate
Audit Responsibility Nomination Remuneration Executive
Committee Committee Committee Committee Committee
Responsible for the Advises the Board on Ensures the Board has Determines the reward Day to day
Group’s financial broad CR policy taking the necessary balance strategy for executive operational
reporting and into account the of skills, experience and directors and senior management and
effectiveness of the overall strategic plan diversity to oversee the managers to ensure implementation
internal and external and other factors. delivery of strategy. reward is aligned to of strategy.
audit functions. shareholders’ interests.
See page 82 See page 90 See page 94 See page 98 See page 22
Meetings between the Chairman and non-executive directors, In accordance with best practice, the Chairman addresses the
both with and without the presence of the Group CEO, are developmental needs of the Board as a whole, with a view to
scheduled in the Board’s annual programme. During the year, further developing its effectiveness as a team and ensures that
the non-executive directors met regularly without the presence each director refreshes and updates his or her individual skills,
of the executives, typically around each Board meeting. These knowledge and expertise. A formal, comprehensive and tailored
meetings were encouraged by the Chairman and provide the induction is given to all directors following their appointment,
non‑executive directors with a forum in which to share including access to external training courses, visits to key
experiences and to discuss wider business topics, fostering locations within the Group and meetings with members of the
Governance
debate in Board and committee meetings and strengthening Executive Committee and other senior executives. The induction
working relationships. also covers a review of the Group’s governance policies,
structures and business, including details of the risks and
In addition to routine financial and operating reports operating issues facing the Group. Details of Karen Witts’
and updates (including health and safety), the Board spends induction can be found on page 96.
time debating and formulating Group strategy and reviewing
its performance. Ensuring that Compass retains its disciplined approach to long
term growth, its focus on food as its core competence, and its
Each year, the Board aims to hold two meetings overseas. By delivery of value for all of its stakeholders is dependent on the
visiting operations, the directors are able to meet with a diverse successful implementation of the strategy set by the Board.
group of colleagues on a more informal basis which greatly While the Group’s strategy is continuously discussed and refined
assists in the succession planning process. These visits provide throughout the year, the Board takes time out of its regular
an opportunity to assess local management performance and schedule every year to debate and reflect on broader strategic
potential, to gain further insight into how the business works on issues. This is supported by strategy updates at every Board
a day to day basis and to speak first hand to local management meeting. The Board held a strategy day in the USA in March
and listen to their views. The format of visits often comprises a when it discussed the Group’s strategy at length. More
macroeconomic overview of the country, its social and political information about the Group’s strategy can be found on
systems, challenges and opportunities, a review of the pages 1 to 63.
competitive landscape, and a detailed review of the relevant
sectors in which the business operates, its people, as well as the Succession planning is a key area of focus for the Board and it
three year plan. The Board also uses these opportunities to hold undertook a detailed succession planning review twice in the
town halls with employees, undertake visits to Company and year with the Group Chief People Officer.
client sites and to meet with high potential employees and
country and regional management teams. The Company’s articles of association provide that one third of
the directors retire by rotation each year and that each director
This year, the overseas Board meetings were held in the USA will seek re-election at the AGM every three years. All directors
and Japan. The Board received presentations on the North submit themselves for annual re-election by shareholders. New
American and APAC regions from local management. During the directors may be appointed by the Board but are subject to
visit to Japan, the Board also received detailed reviews of the election by shareholders at the first opportunity after their
Japanese and Indian operations and the Chairman hosted a appointment. The articles of association limit the number of
town hall event for local employees with the Group CEO, directors to not less than two and not more than 20, save where
Regional MD, APAC, and MD, Japan. The Board also attended a shareholders decide otherwise. Non-executive directors are
number of evening receptions and dinners in both the USA and normally appointed for an initial term of three years, which is
Japan to enable the directors to meet with senior management reviewed and may be extended by two further three year terms.
and high potential employees in a more relaxed, informal setting. It is Board policy that non-executive director appointments
should last for no more than nine years.
The Board has established a procedure for directors, if deemed
necessary, to take independent professional advice at the
Company’s expense in the furtherance of their duties. Every
director also has access to the Group General Counsel and
Company Secretary, who helps to ensure that Board procedures
are followed, and that good corporate governance and
compliance are implemented throughout the Group. Together
with the Group CEO and the Group General Counsel and
Company Secretary, the Chairman ensures that the Board is
kept properly informed and is consulted on all issues reserved
for it. Board papers and other information are distributed in a
timely fashion to allow directors to be properly briefed in
advance of meetings. In accordance with the Company’s articles
of association, directors have been granted an indemnity by the
Company to the extent permitted by law in respect of liabilities
Governance
• risk management and internal control
• succession planning and people management Findings of review
• priorities going forward Reports on the performance of the Board, the Chairman and its
committees were compiled by the Lintstock evaluation team
Initial information gathering took place in April 2019 following based on information and views supplied by those interviewed
which participants, including Palmer Brown, who acted as and all recommendations made by Lintstock were based on best
interim Group CFO in the period leading up to Karen Witts’ practice. Lintstock’s conclusions were initially shared with the
appointment, completed online Board and committee surveys Chairman and Group General Counsel and Company Secretary.
that had been tailored as appropriate. Based on agreed themes, The reports were circulated to participants in mid-August so as
the surveys were designed to be objective, thought provoking to give participants time to digest the contents of the reports in
and to encourage candid responses. The information acquired advance of the September Board meeting when Lintstock
from the completed surveys was used by the evaluation team at reviewed its findings with the Board.
Lintstock to structure their approach in advance of one on one
interviews with members of the Board and the Group General
Counsel and Company Secretary.
The content of Lintstock’s report and the conclusion of the Board discussion were recorded by the Group General Counsel and
Company Secretary in the minutes of the September meeting.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
As part of their ongoing development, the executive directors Throughout the Governance and Directors' Report, we
may seek one external non-executive role on a non-competitor have set out how we have applied the main principles and
board, for which they may retain the remuneration in respect of complied with the relevant provisions of the Code.
the appointment. In order to avoid any conflict of interest, all
appointments are subject to Board approval and the Board UK CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE
monitors the extent of directors’ other interests and the time COMPLIANCE
commitment required to fulfil those interests to ensure that its Responsibility for good governance lies with the Board.
effectiveness is not compromised.
The Board is accountable to shareholders and is
Each director has a duty under the Companies Act 2006 committed to the highest standards of corporate
(CA 2006) to avoid a situation in which he or she has or can have governance as set out in the UK Corporate Governance
a direct or indirect interest that conflicts or possibly may conflict Code 2016 (the Code). The Code can be found on
with the interests of the Company. This duty is in addition to the the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) website at
obligation that he or she owes to the Company to disclose to the www.frc.org.uk.
Board an interest in any transaction or arrangement under
This Corporate Governance Report, together with the
consideration by the Company. The Company’s articles of
Directors’ Remuneration Report set out on pages 98
association authorise the directors to approve such situations
to 121, describes how the Board has applied the main
and to include other provisions to allow conflicts of interest to
principles of good governance and complied with the
be dealt with. The Board follows an established procedure when
relevant provisions as set out in the Code for the year
deciding whether to authorise an actual or potential conflict of
under review.
interest. Only independent directors (i.e. those who have no
interest in the matter under consideration) will be able to make The Directors’ Report also contains information required
the relevant decision and, in making the decision, the directors to be disclosed under the UK Listing Authority’s (UKLA)
must act in good faith and in a way they consider will be most Rules and under the Disclosure Guidance and
likely to promote the Company’s success. Furthermore, the Transparency Rules (DTR). To the extent necessary,
directors may, if appropriate, impose limits or conditions when certain information is incorporated into this Report
granting authorisation. Any authorities are reviewed at least by reference.
every 15 months.
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The Board considered and authorised each director’s reported It is the Board’s view that for the year ended
actual and potential conflicts of interest at its July 2019 Board 30 September 2019 the Company has been fully
meeting and considers any changes on an ad hoc basis compliant with all of the principles and provisions set out
throughout the year.
in the Code.
A board should establish the Remuneration policies and In order for a company to meet
company’s purpose, values practices should be designed to its responsibilities to
and strategy, and satisfy itself support strategy and promote shareholders and stakeholders,
that these and its culture are long term sustainable success. the board should ensure
aligned. All directors must Executive remuneration should effective engagement with,
Governance
act with integrity, lead by be aligned to company purpose and encourage participation
example and promote the and values, and be clearly linked from, these parties.
desired culture. to the successful delivery of the
company’s long term strategy. To succeed in the long term,
This year, there was a renewed companies need to build and
focus on ethics and compliance A formal and transparent sustain relationships with a wide
Alison Yapp to further embed a culture of procedure for developing policy range of stakeholders and, in
Group General Counsel integrity and to empower on executive remuneration and particular, employees. These
and Company Secretary employees to continue to speak determining director and senior relationships work well if they
up and raise concerns. We management remuneration are based on trust and respect
appointed a Group Head of should be established. No and are mutually beneficial.
Compass will Ethics and Compliance as we director should be involved in
report against the continue to improve our key deciding their own remuneration We know how important our
2018 UK Corporate policies and procedures in outcome. employees are to our
Governance Code (the this area. continued success and we
2018 Code) from the Our remuneration policies and welcome the emphasis that the
financial year ending Various initiatives are taking practices are designed to 2018 Code places on promoting
place across the Group to support our strategy and effective engagement with
30 September 2020.
reinforce the values and promote long term sustainable stakeholders and, in particular,
Over the past year, we behaviours that support the success. Executive workforce engagement and
have been reviewing our Group’s strategy, some of which remuneration is aligned to employee voice.
governance framework are set out below. Company purpose and values
and is clearly linked to the Details of some of the actions
and reflecting on how • we launched our set of three taken during the year are set
successful delivery of the
we engage with our key Compass commitments – out below.
Company’s long term strategy.
stakeholders in Respect, Growth and
preparation for the Teamwork – that define what Details of some of the actions • elected a designated NED for
change in emphasis our people can expect when taken during the year are set workforce engagement who,
brought about by the they work for us out below. together with the Group Chief
2018 Code. People Officer and the Group
• we are reviewing our Ethics
• the terms of reference of the Engagement Director, will
and Compliance programme
Remuneration Committee ensure that the voice of our
which is aligned to our culture
were refreshed to align with workforce is clearly heard at
and values and informed by
the provisions of the 2018 Board level
best practice. The
Code and other sources of • conducted a global
programme will focus efforts
best practice and regulation engagement survey to enable
on culture and ethics to
strengthen controls. It will • the Committee received a us to track people’s
incorporate regulatory and detailed update on the wider experience against our
stakeholder requirements to workforce policies and Commitments
manage our risks practices in place in the • initiatives are underway to
appropriately business for review, in improve existing processes
preparation for requirements which are in place for
• an ethical leadership
of the 2018 Code engaging with other
programme is being
developed in conjunction stakeholder groups
with the People function
• preparations are underway to
launch a refreshed Code of
Business Conduct and
awareness campaign in 2020,
including the creation of an
ethics champion network,
briefings, webinars and an
engagement pack
Stakeholder oversight
The Chairman ensures that the Board maintains an appropriate throughout the year, with a particular intensity leading up to,
dialogue with shareholders. The Group CEO, Group CFO and the during and after shareholder meetings. Although the non-
Group Investor Relations and Corporate Affairs Director regularly executive directors are not formally required to meet the
meet with institutional investors to discuss strategic issues and shareholders of the Company, their attendance at presentations
to make presentations on the Company’s results. Non-executive of the interim and annual results is encouraged. All of our
directors develop an understanding of the views of major shareholders are invited to attend our AGM, which provides a
shareholders through regular updates from the Group Investor forum in which they can put questions to the Board and the
Relations and Corporate Affairs Director. The Group General committee chairmen. It also provides shareholders with an
Counsel and Company Secretary also acts as an important focal opportunity to meet with directors and other senior executives
point for communications on corporate governance matters on a more informal basis at the meeting.
Governance
across the Group. This technology of our People strategy. Our unit and practical ways to measure waste
provides a better consumer experience managers are absolutely critical to the through various food waste
by improving speed of service and also success of our business. They set the management systems. In the UK,
by driving efficiencies and reducing the tone for the unit, hire people, buy food, technology is being trialled which
risks from cash handling. Some are responsible for health and safety will allow the business to more
countries are taking the lead in and deal with daily operational issues. accurately record and reduce waste. We
developing next generation tools. For We want to make our unit managers’ are also considering other new initiatives
example, our French business has lives easier by reducing their around packaging and plastics that are
started using Smart Checkout. This administrative burden so that they better for the environment and are
award winning concept uses camera can focus more attention on our clients, seeking to persuade our consumers to
based technology and artificial our consumers and our employees. adopt more sustainable behaviours.
intelligence to recognise the precise Following the successful completion Good progress is being made, but there
dishes on the tray, map them to the of pilots in our two largest markets, is more to do. Investing in the business
Electronic Point of Sale System and a development programme is being for the future is important. It helps the
price them for the consumer. Smart rolled out to all of our unit managers Company to build on its competitive
Checkout also has the potential to globally – around 40,000 people in advantage and to capitalise on our
increase consumer sales by promoting 45 countries. structural growth opportunities with the
complementary products such as aim of delivering better quality,
beverages or desserts, tailored to the sustainable long term growth.
individual consumer’s buying habits.
Governance
Each year, the Audit Committee critically reviews its own
performance and considers where improvements can be made
As a result, appropriate arrangements have been made
and in so doing it considers, amongst other things, those matters
within the Committee schedule for the coming year and I look
discussed by the Audit Committee, such as:
forward to reporting on our progress in next year’s Audit
• composition, structure and activities Committee Report.
• how well the Committee oversees the financial THE YEAR AHEAD
reporting process In the coming year, the Committee will continue to work together
• its review of the work of the internal audit function and the with the Board and the other committees to monitor and review
external auditor the effectiveness of the Group’s financial reporting and risk
• the effectiveness of the process for raising concerns management and internal control framework. In addition, we
• its monitoring of the management of risk will continue to focus on the resilience of our cyber security and
• how well it understands and evaluates the effectiveness and IT controls and on ensuring that all new accounting standards,
conclusions of internal control and the adequacy of the relevant legislation and guidance, including the provisions of the
related disclosures 2018 Code, are being met.
• whether the Committee’s terms of reference are appropriate
for the particular circumstances of the Company and comply
with prevailing legislation and best practice
• whether the number and length of time of Committee John Bason
meetings are sufficient to meet the role and responsibilities of Chairman of the Audit Committee
the Committee and coincide with key dates within the
financial reporting and audit cycle 26 November 2019
• identification of additional training needs for
Committee members
RISK APPETITE, PRINCIPAL OPERATIONAL RISKS AND The purpose of the review was to determine in the context of the
RISK ASSURANCE macro environment and Group strategy:
The Board’s attitude to and appetite for risk are communicated
to the Group’s businesses through the strategy planning i. if the principal risks and uncertainties disclosed in the
process. In determining its risk appetite, the Board recognises 2018 Annual Report and Accounts applied to the current
that a prudent and robust approach to risk mitigation must be financial year
carefully balanced with a degree of flexibility so that the ii. whether there had been any year on year variance in the
entrepreneurial spirit which has greatly contributed to the status of each risk
success of the Company is not inhibited. The Committee and the iii. what should be removed or added
Board remain satisfied that the Company’s internal risk control
framework continues to provide the necessary element of As set out in the Principal Risks section on pages 41 to 45, last
flexibility without compromising the integrity of risk management year’s risks continue to be pertinent, albeit our perception of
and internal control systems. how these risks have, as appropriate, remained static, increased
or diminished, may have changed.
We continue to develop and grow our business but, of course, in
some of the territories where we operate, the concept of FAIR, BALANCED AND UNDERSTANDABLE
corporate governance is still underdeveloped. In these regions in The UK Corporate Governance Code 2016 (the Code) provides
particular, it is important to have a clear, well-established that, through its financial reporting, the Board should provide a
system of risk management and internal control to ensure that fair, balanced and understandable assessment of the
growth is underpinned by solid business practice. In this regard, Company’s prospects. At the Board’s request, the Committee
we have further strengthened our Regional Governance has reviewed the 2019 Annual Report and Accounts to
Committees (RGCs) with the aim of further embedding the determine whether it considered that the document, taken as a
Group’s risk management culture within the business. whole, meets this standard and provides the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position
The Group Risk Management Committee (RMC), comprising a and performance, business model and strategy. The Committee
multi-disciplinary team of key individuals, assists the Audit has concluded that this requirement has been met.
Committee with its work. The Chairman of the RMC Committee
is the Group CFO and the membership comprises the Group Throughout the Annual Report and Accounts, we track our
General Counsel and Company Secretary, the Director of Group performance against a mix of financial and non-financial KPIs,
Internal Audit, the Group Financial Controller, the Group Investor which the Board and executive management consider best
Relations and Corporate Affairs Director, the Group Chief People reflect our strategic priorities. The Committee has considered
Officer and the Group Director of Strategy and M&A. The RMC, these KPIs and is satisfied that the information that has been
in conjunction with the efforts of its colleagues in the Group’s selected by the Board and the executive management will help
RGCs, further embeds the Group’s risk management culture to convey an understanding of the culture of the business and
within the business. It also provides an additional layer of the drivers which contribute to its ongoing success and will be of
oversight to help underpin the assurances given by the Audit interest to stakeholders.
Committee to the Board in connection with the appropriateness
of the Group’s financial reporting, the effectiveness of the
internal and external audit functions, the management of the
Group’s systems of internal control and business risks, and
related compliance activities.
Governance
external auditor, including: this review to indicate that anything but limited judgement was
–– at the Board’s request, whether the Annual Report and required, or that purchasing income had not been accounted
Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and for in accordance with the Group’s accounting policies
understandable and provides the information necessary –– the level of provisioning for liabilities (including tax) where
for shareholders to assess the Company’s position and management, accounting and legal judgements are important.
performance, business model and strategy The Committee discussed with management the key
–– the clarity of disclosures and compliance with financial judgements made, in particular, the policy efforts being led by
reporting standards and relevant financial and governance the EU and OECD which may have a material impact on the
reporting requirements and guidelines, including the taxation of all international businesses, including relevant legal
European Securities and Markets Authority Guidelines advice. The external auditor also reported on all material
on Alternative Performance Measures provisions to the Committee
–– discussing the critical accounting policies and use of • the adoption in the year of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts
assumptions and estimates, as noted in section B of with customers’ and IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’ and the
the accounting policies on page 146 of this Annual Report, appropriateness of disclosures included in the Annual Report
and concluding that the estimates, judgements and and Accounts
assumptions used were reasonable based on the information • preparation for the adoption of IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ in the financial
available and had been used appropriately in applying the year ending 30 September 2020 and the disclosures included
Company’s accounting policies. This included, for example, in the Annual Report and Accounts
the consideration of any goodwill impairment assessments
• the going concern and viability statements
and how these were addressed
• non-financial information
In addition to its key role in the financial reporting process, the Committee considered the following at its meetings:
2018 2019
November May September
• full year results • KPMG External Audit Plan • year end matters
–– summary of 2018 Preliminary Results 2018-2019 –– accounting issues and financial
–– certificates of assurance • 2019 interim results review reporting update
–– year end accounting and • key accounting and reporting –– tax update
control matters matters and tax update –– KPMG early issues report
–– tax update • feedback from country interim • Internal Audit
–– draft press release certificates of assurance –– activity report (including key financial
–– draft Annual Report and • going concern controls update) (May-July 2019)
Accounts (including the report of • KPMG report on interim –– approval of 2019–2020 Internal
the Audit Committee) results review Audit Plan
–– fair, balanced and understandable • Internal Audit activity report • Regional Governance Committees update
annual report reading guide • GDPR update • 2019 Annual Report and Accounts
• going concern and viability statements • Regional Governance –– draft Audit Committee Report,
• KPMG report to the Audit Committee Committees update Principal Risks and Internal
on the 2017-2018 audit and key issues • use of auditor for Controls report
• Internal Audit update non-audit services • Digital & Technology Solutions update
• Regional Governance • private discussion with auditor • GDPR update
Committees update • terms of reference annual review
• use of auditor for non-audit services • use of auditor for non-audit services
• private discussion with auditor • private discussion with auditor
Governance
appointment, reappointment and removal of the Company’s 2019 audit, the degree to which KPMG was able to assess key
external auditor, and considers the risks associated with its accounting and audit judgements and the content of the audit
withdrawal from the market in its risk evaluation and planning. committee report issued by the external auditor. On the basis of
the Committee’s evaluation and taking into account the views of
The Audit Committee also reviews and sets the terms, areas of other key internal stakeholders, the Committee concluded that
responsibility and scope of the audit as set out in the external both the audit and the audit process were effective.
auditor’s engagement letter; the overall work plan for the
forthcoming year, together with the associated fee proposal and The total fees paid to KPMG in the year ended 30 September
cost effectiveness of the audit; the external auditor’s 2019 were £6.5 million, of which £0.4 million related to
independence; any major issues which arise during the course non-audit work (2018: £7.0 million of which £0.7 million related
of the audit and their resolution; key accounting and audit to non-audit work). Further disclosure of the non-audit fees paid
judgements; the level of errors identified during the audit; the during the year can be found in note 3 on page 165.
recommendations made to management by the auditor and
REAPPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR
management’s response; and the auditor’s overall performance.
There are no contractual restrictions on the Company’s choice
During the year, the Committee also considered the findings of of external auditor and, in making its recommendation to
the FRC’s Audit Quality Review on KPMG and, in particular, how shareholders on the reappointment of KPMG, the Committee
KPMG were addressing the points raised. took into account, amongst other matters, the tenure, objectivity
and independence of KPMG and its continuing effectiveness
The Company operates a policy on non-audit fees which it and cost as well as the availability of firms within the wider
reviews annually and discloses the ratio of audit to non-audit audit market.
fees paid in each financial year.
The Committee also considered the report on KPMG, as a firm,
The Committee monitors the extent of non-audit work which the of the Audit Quality Review team of the FRC.
external auditor can perform, to ensure that the provision of
those non-audit services that can be undertaken by the external KPMG has expressed its willingness to continue as auditor of the
auditor falls within the agreed policy and does not impair its Company. Separate resolutions proposing KPMG’s
objectivity or independence. In line with the Group’s policy on reappointment and the determination of its remuneration by the
non-audit services, the external auditor is, in general, excluded Audit Committee will be proposed at the 2020 AGM.
from providing the Company with general consultancy and all
DISCLOSURE OF RELEVANT AUDIT INFORMATION
other non-audit services, unless there is no other competent and
The directors confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there
available provider. Engagements for non-audit services that are
is no relevant audit information of which KPMG is unaware and
not prohibited are subject to formal approval by the Audit
each director has taken all the steps that ought to have been
Committee based on the level of fees involved. Non-audit
taken as a director to be aware of any relevant audit information
services that are pre-approved are either: routine in nature (i.e.
and to establish that KPMG is aware of that information.
the half year limited review) with a fee that is not significant in
the context of the audit; or are audit related services.
Governance
Such systems are reviewed by the Board to deal with Counsel and Company Secretary, Group Chief People Officer,
changing circumstances. Group Director of Strategy and M&A and the Group Director
International Clients & Market Development.
A summary of the key financial risks inherent in the Group’s
business is given on pages 41 to 45. Risk assessment and This is underpinned by a formal major risk assessment process,
evaluation are an integral part of the annual planning cycle. which is an integral part of the annual business cycle and is also
Each business documents the strategic objectives and the a robust process adopted to support the viability statement.
effectiveness of the Group’s systems of internal control. As part Each of the Group’s businesses is required to identify and
of the review, each significant business and function has been document major risks facing their business and appropriate
required to identify and document each substantial risk, mitigating activities and controls, and to monitor and report to
together with the mitigating actions implemented to manage, management on the effectiveness of these controls on a
monitor and report to management on the effectiveness of these biannual basis. These reports, together with reports on internal
controls. Senior managers are also required to sign biannual control and departures, if any, from established Group
confirmations of compliance with key procedures and to report procedures prepared by both the internal and external auditors,
any breakdowns in, or exceptions to, these procedures. are reviewed by the Group CFO and the Audit Committee.
Summarised results are presented to senior management Group companies also submit biannual risk and internal
(including to the RGCs) and to the Board. control assurance letters to the Group CFO on internal control
and risk management issues, with comments on the control
These processes have been in place throughout the financial environment within their operations. The Group CFO
year ended 30 September 2019 and have continued to the date summarises these submissions for the Audit Committee, and
of this Report. Taken together, these processes and the reports the Chairman of the Audit Committee reports to the Board on
they generate, which are considered by the Audit Committee, any matters that have arisen from the Committee’s review of the
constitute a robust assessment of key risks and the internal way in which risk management and internal control processes
controls that exist, and are designed to mitigate these risks. have been applied.
The Board has reviewed the effectiveness of the Group’s system
of internal control for the year under review and a summary of The Board has formal procedures in place for the approval of
the principal control structures and processes in place across client contracts, capital investment and acquisition projects,
the Group is set out in this Report. with clearly designated levels of authority, supported by post
investment review processes for selected acquisitions, client
CONTROL ENVIRONMENT contracts and major capital expenditure. The Board considers
Whilst the Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s social, environmental and ethical matters in relation to the
system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness, it Group’s business and assesses these when reviewing the risks
has delegated responsibility for the operation of the internal faced by the Group; further information regarding environmental
control and risk management programme to the Executive and ethical matters is available on pages 52 to 63. The Board is
Committee. The detailed review of internal control has been conscious of the effect such matters may have on the short and
delegated to the Audit Committee. The management of each long term value of the Company.
business is responsible for internal control and risk management
within its own business and for ensuring compliance with the The external auditor of the Company and the Group Internal
Group’s policies and procedures. Each business has appointed a Audit Director attend Audit Committee meetings and receive its
risk champion whose primary role in such capacity is to ensure papers. Committee members meet regularly with the external
compliance by local management with the Group’s risk auditor and with the Group Internal Audit Director, without the
management and internal control programme. The internal presence of executive management.
auditors and external independent auditor have reviewed
the overall approach adopted by the Group towards its There were no changes to the Company’s internal control over
risk management activities so as to reinforce these financial reporting that occurred during the year ended
internal control requirements. 30 September 2019 that have affected materially, or are
reasonably likely to affect materially, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Governance
• Better for the World sustainability performance in support of the Company’s Social
Purpose, a number of examples of which are set in the CR report
HEALTH, SAFETY AND SUSTAINABILITY on pages 52 to 63.
The safety of employees, clients and consumers remains a top
priority for Compass and our safety culture continues to be The Company seeks to ensure that its CR strategy remains
strengthened throughout the business. In this regard, the CR aligned to the Company’s values and goals and more details of
Committee supports the Group’s ambition of zero harm and performance during the year can be found in our CR report on
creating a culture of interdependence where caring for each pages 52 to 63. The Committee will review the KPIs for the
other is second nature. The health and safety and food safety coming year to ensure that they continue to be aligned to the
performance is considered by the CR Committee at each Company’s social purpose and demonstrate our commitment to
meeting against agreed KPIs. Both our global lost time incident continuous improvement.
rate and our global food safety incident rate have improved since
2015 by 38% and 35% respectively. Whilst these results suggest ETHICS AND COMPLIANCE
progress in the right direction, we recognise that there is no During the year, the Board continued to focus on continuous
room for complacency. improvements in the Group’s ethics and compliance
programmes and, in support of this aim, the Company appointed
At the start of each meeting, the CR Committee considers a a Group Head of Ethics and Compliance who reports to the
safety moment. This helps the Committee to develop a deeper Group General Counsel and Company Secretary. The Group
understanding of the health and safety risks facing the business Head of Ethics and Compliance attends each meeting of the CR
and to consider how the lessons learned from specific incidents Committee by invitation to provide updates on ethics
can be applied to help prevent similar incidents from recurring. and governance matters.
Safety walks have also been introduced as a leading indicator for
all leaders above unit manager. This encourages conversations The Group Head of Ethics and Compliance is reviewing the
about safety within our businesses and helps to support a strong ethics and compliance framework with relevant stakeholders to
safety culture. ensure that our practices, policies and procedures are up to
date and reflect best practice. He is also taking a leading role in
Sadly, during the year there were two fatalities in the Group, an ensuring compliance with the various data privacy controls that
incident in our South African business and a road traffic are in place across the Group.
accident in our USA business. In each instance, a full
investigation was conducted and the outcome reported to the HUMAN RIGHTS AND MODERN SLAVERY
directors and senior executives. Support was provided by our The Company will publish its fourth Modern Slavery Act (MSA)
local operations to the families of the deceased. In the USA, the statement in December. This year’s statement, which was
road traffic accident investigation was conducted by the police. reviewed by the Committee on behalf of the Board, has been
In South Africa an investigation was conducted by our local refreshed to create a more insightful document with a
business, in conjunction with the client on whose site the perspective of the challenges and opportunities a group the
accident took place. Mr Blakemore and Ms Witts’ entitlements scale of Compass faces when assessing the human rights and
to bonus relating to the achievement of LTIFR related targets modern slavery risks across its businesses and supply chain. A
were reduced to zero to recognise that the Group had suffered a copy of this document can be found on our website
fatality in South Africa during the year which occurred whilst the www.compass-group.com. In the coming year, the Company
employee had been at work, albeit that management were not will proceed with a comprehensive human rights impact
considered to be culpable. This recognises the seriousness with assessment. The project will be supported by a Human Rights
which the Company takes HSE outcomes. Working Group which is sponsored by the Group Chief People
Officer. The assessment will be conducted across the Group’s
During the year, the Committee received an update on the businesses and global supply chain in conjunction with
Group’s Global Safety Standards, including the Group’s Allergen independent consultants. This assessment will give the
Management Plan which focuses, amongst other things, on Company a much clearer and transparent understanding of
improving labelling, food preparation, training and human rights and related risks in our supply chain and with third
communication to help safeguard our consumers. Consideration parties. This work will support a review of the Company’s third
was also given to further improving our supply chain standards party due diligence process as part of an update to our policies
and practices. and procedures to ensure it remains effective.
2018 2019
November May September
• safety moment • safety moment • safety moment
• health and safety performance • health and safety performance • terms of reference review
• CR strategy and KPIs for inclusion in and sustainability update • health and safety performance and
the 2018 Annual Report • governance update sustainability update
• Modern Slavery Act statement • ethics and compliance update • social purpose strategy update
• CR – social purpose • annual review of Charitable • human rights impact assessment
• review final draft content for inclusion Donations Policy • ethics and compliance update
in the 2018 Annual Report CR Report/ • governance and regulatory update
CR Committee Report
• governance and regulatory update
The Committee will continue to keep the Board informed about The CR Committee receives reports from the Global Safety and
the developments in governance and regulatory matters and to Sustainability Director, Group General Counsel and Company
ensure that the Company is compliant with regulatory and best Secretary, Group Head of Ethics and Compliance, Group Chief
practice guidelines, including the 2018 Code, which the People Officer and other senior managers to ensure that
Company will report against from the financial year ending progress is being made towards meeting the Group’s specific
30 September 2020. CR KPIs and our ongoing CR commitments.
Governance
CR Committee thoroughly reviewed its terms of reference to to the Group also received high ratings. The corporate
align them more closely to the Company's strategy, including responsibility KPIs were positively rated and it was noted that
its Performance, People and Purpose strategic initiatives, the these were in the process of being developed to align with the
provisions of the 2018 Code and best practice. Going forward, Company’s strategy.
the CR Committee will also oversee compliance with the 2018
Code requirements in relation to stakeholder engagement In order to reflect the broader scope of matters falling within
from 1 October 2019, including workforce engagement and the CR Committee’s remit, it was agreed that the number of
employee voice. meetings would increase from two to a minimum of three each
year and that the duration of the meetings should also be
The CR Committee is authorised to seek information from any increased. It was noted that the terms of reference of the CR
employee of the Group to enable it to perform its duties, and if Committee had been revised in the year to ensure alignment
necessary, at the expense of the Company, can obtain legal with the Company’s strategy and to reflect the provisions of
or other independent professional advice on matters covered the 2018 Code, regulations and best practice.
by its terms of reference. The terms of reference of the CR
Committee are reviewed annually to ensure that they continue Other priorities identified for improvement in the CR
to be fit for purpose. Committee’s performance in the coming year included
enhanced focus on food safety and sustainability.
The CR Committee Chairman attends the AGM to meet
with shareholders and to answer any questions on the An update on progress will be provided in the 2020 Annual
Committee’s activities. Report and Accounts.
YEAR IN REVIEW
Succession planning continues to be the primary focus of the
Committee’s work.
Governance
includes activities and meetings with key personnel, technical
Only members of the Committee have the right to attend briefings and site visits. This is an effective way of introducing
Committee meetings. Other individuals, such as the Group them to the Group’s culture and of ensuring that they have the
CEO, the Group Chief People Officer and external advisors may information and support they need to understand the business
be invited to attend all or part of any meeting, as and and to enable them to be productive in their role.
when appropriate.
REAPPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS
The Committee is authorised to seek information from any The Board’s policy is to ensure that the Board is made up of
employee of the Group to enable it to perform its duties and, if members with a range of skills and qualities to meet its primary
necessary, at the expense of the Company, can obtain legal or responsibility for promoting the success of the Company in a way
other independent professional advice on matters covered by its that ensures that the interests of shareholders and other
terms of reference. stakeholders are promoted and protected. The Board is
conscious of the length of tenure of non-executives when
The Committee Chairman attends the AGM to meet
formulating its succession planning process. Non-executive
with shareholders and answer questions on the
directors and the Chairman are generally appointed for a period
Committee’s activities.
of three years, which may be renewed for a further two terms.
TERMS OF REFERENCE Reappointment is not automatic at the end of each three year
The terms of reference of the Committee are reviewed annually term. The Nomination Committee considers the selection and
to ensure that they continue to be fit for purpose. reappointment of directors carefully before making a
recommendation to the Board.
A cross-functional working group was established in the year
under the stewardship of the Group General Counsel and Stefan Bomhard completed his first three year term in May
Company Secretary to consider and implement the changes 2019. In making its recommendation for his reappointment,
required under the 2018 Code. As a result, the Committee’s the Committee considered the composition of the Board and the
terms of reference have been substantially updated and the skills, experience and expertise of its membership to ensure that
Committee will report against the 2018 Code in next year’s it had the variety of perspectives and skills needed to help the
Annual Report. The terms of reference are available on the Company achieve its strategic aims. Stefan’s performance and
Company’s website www.compass-group.com. ability to contribute effectively to Board discussion and to
challenge the performance of management were considered.
BOARD APPOINTMENT PROCESS The Committee is satisfied that Stefan continues to be able to
The process for making new appointments to the Board is led by devote enough time to his duties at Compass, taking into
the Chairman. The Nomination Committee has procedures for account his position as CEO of Inchcape plc.
appointing a non-executive or an executive director which are
set out in its terms of reference. For example, when appointing In February 2020, the Chairman’s second term in office will
a chairman, this includes an assessment of the time come to an end. John Bason chaired that part of the relevant
commitment expected, recognising the need for availability in Nomination Committee meeting which considered the
the event of crises. Chairman’s reappointment.
Prior to making an appointment, the Nomination Committee In recommending his reappointment, the Committee considered
evaluates the balance of skills, knowledge, independence, the Chairman’s relationship and communications with Board
experience and diversity on the Board and, in consideration of members, his management of Board meetings and his ability,
this, prepares a description of the role and capabilities required, taking into account the responsibilities of his other mandates,
with a view to ensuring that the best placed individual for the role to devote sufficient time to Compass recognising the need for
is recommended to the Board for appointment. The Board availability in the event of crises.
promotes an environment which is supportive of all individuals
The Committee concluded that the Chairman’s contribution to
from diverse backgrounds and thus, in identifying suitable
Board leadership and Stefan’s contribution to Board and
candidates, the Nomination Committee normally:
committee discussion and debate remained both desirable and
• uses open advertising or the services of external advisors to valuable to the Company, resulting in the extension of both of
facilitate the search their tenures for a further term of three years.
Since joining, Karen has attended business and budget reviews in the Asia Pacific, Continental Europe, Latin America, North
America and UK & Ireland regions. Site visits were arranged which included key locations in the Group. These visits gave Karen
an opportunity to meet with local management teams and other colleagues and to speak with them first hand and to listen to
their views.
Karen participated in the annual investor roadshow which was held in New York following the release of our half year results and
spent time meeting with investors. She has also had one to one meetings with her Board colleagues and has met with sector heads,
senior management and members of the Company’s governance and control functions.
Details of some of the activities undertaken by Karen are set out below:
Global Business Senior Management • APAC, Continental Europe, North America and UK & Ireland
Sector Heads business reviews
• APAC, Continental Europe, Latin America, North America and UK & Ireland
business budget reviews
• half year results roadshow
• various site visits, including the US operations based in Charlotte, USA
Governance Group General Counsel • review of the governance framework and landscape
legal and and Company Secretary • Board and committee matters
compliance • overview of the Group’s legal and compliance framework
and material litigation
Health, Group Safety and • execution of safety and sustainability strategies, priorities and initiatives and
safety and Sustainability Director their alignment to the Performance, People and Purpose strategy
sustainability
Strategic Group CEO • overview of the Group’s businesses and business model, three year business
plan and Group Director of Strategy plan and strategic aims
business model and M&A • review of the Group’s M&A strategy
Finance Group Financial Controller • financial control framework and governance processes
• internal and external reporting of the Company’s results
Tax Head of Group Tax • review of the Group’s tax strategy and profile, principal uncertain tax
positions and areas requiring the exercise of judgement
• tax governance procedures and control framework
People Group Chief People Officer • review of the Group’s People strategy including succession planning,
diversity and inclusion and engagement initiatives
Group Reward Group Reward & Diversity • Group remuneration philosophy, executive remuneration and annual cycle
Director • long term incentive plan
International Group Director International • overview of International Clients portfolio and pipeline
Clients and Clients & Market • growth and innovation strategy and digital structure for Rest of World
Market Development • sales and retention excellence programmes
Development
Investor Interim Group Investor • Compass’ investment case, key areas of investor focus and
Relations Relations and Corporate IR annual programme
Affairs Director
Treasury Group Treasurer • overview of the Group’s treasury operations, governance, funding,
credit ratings, liquidity management, foreign exchange and interest rate
risk management
IT Group Chief Information • overview of the digital and technology function including in-depth reviews
Officer on strategy, operating model, initiatives and cyber security
Internal Audit Group Internal Audit • review of Group Internal Audit plan, internal control framework,
Director key financial controls, Speak Up programme and the biannual major
risk assessment process
2018 2019
October March September
• considered appointment of Karen Witts • considered renewal of Stefan • annual review of terms of reference
as Group CFO Bomhard’s tenure for a further • considered renewal of Paul Walsh’s
three year term tenure for a further three year term
• reviewed time required from
the Chairman, SID and
non‑executive directors
Governance
• considered training requirements
for the directors as part of the
annual performance evaluation
Governance
31 December 2018. His leaving terms were within the People and Purpose. These matters will be given careful thought
approved Policy, consisting of remuneration until the end of during the Policy review process. Engagement with our key
his employment. Payments in lieu of notice were subject to investors during our last Policy review in 2017 was constructive
mitigation and were reduced accordingly. All LTIP awards and helpful. We look forward to engaging with them on the
which would have vested following his departure were forfeit. Policy again in the coming year.
The shares from Mr Thomson’s 2015-2016 LTIP award which
vested in November 2018 remain subject to a two year post vest COMMITTEE EVALUATION
holding period. Mr Thomson was not eligible for an annual The findings of this year’s external evaluation of the performance
bonus payment in respect of 2018-2019. These terms are of the Remuneration Committee can be found on page 101.
set out in more detail on page 119 and are in line with those
previously announced. OTHER MATTERS
At our 2019 AGM, shareholders supported the resolution
Karen Witts was appointed to the role of Group CFO in October seeking approval to pay the full fee to each non-executive
2018 and commenced employment on 8 April 2019. Details of director in respect of each non-executive role they perform for
her terms set out on page 119 are in line with the announcement the Company without regard to the annual cap of £125,000 as
made on 11 October 2018 and on page 91 of the 2018 set out in the Policy. The Board has reviewed this element of
Annual Report and Accounts. how we operate our Policy following changes to the Companies
(Directors’ Remuneration Policy and Directors’ Remuneration
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DEVELOPMENTS Report) Regulations 2019 which apply to companies reporting
The Committee has reviewed the legislative and best practice on financial years starting on or after 10 June 2019. As a result
developments in respect of director remuneration and of the review, the Board concluded it would be more appropriate
welcomes change to raise the bar in this area. The introduction to set the cap on directors’ fees by reference to the aggregate
of the UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 (the 2018 Code) cap in the Company’s articles of association of £2.25 million
which seeks to broaden the role of the Committee, as well as to which was approved by shareholders at the Company’s AGM in
introduce additional measures concerning director pay, has February 2017. This allows the Company to allocate
been carefully considered by the Committee during the year. In appropriately compensated duties to individual directors as
July, the Committee received a detailed update on the wider required whilst retaining current limits on the total non‑executive
workforce policies and practices. This supplements other director fees payable. Although this is not a matter for the
regular updates; for example, at the time decisions are taken in Remuneration Committee, as the non-executive director fees
respect of salary review for executive directors and the Executive must be included in the Remuneration Report, it is pertinent to
Committee, the Remuneration Committee is updated on our draw shareholder attention to the proposal.
global salary review budgets and trends.
More details of the proposed resolution can be found in the
Over the course of the year, preparations have been 2019 Notice of Meeting on pages 235 and 238.
undertaken to ensure that the Committee is well placed to fully
comply with the 2018 Code, as well as with the Shareholders’ CONCLUSION
Rights Directive II, both of which will be effective for Compass The voting outcome at the 2019 AGM in respect of the Annual
from the financial year ending 30 September 2020. The Remuneration Report for the year ended 30 September 2018
Company will report against the new regulations in next year’s together with the results of voting on the Policy at the 2018 AGM
Directors’ Remuneration Report. are set out on page 121.
The Committee also reviewed its terms of reference to ensure I look forward to welcoming you and receiving your support at
that they continue to be fit for purpose and in line with best the upcoming AGM.
practice. The review was undertaken with guidance from the
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary.
26 November 2019
At a glance
REMUNERATION IN 2018-2019
MEASURING PERFORMANCE
Bonus LTIP
Measuring performance Strategic KPI Weighting1 Weighting1
Growing and retaining our customer Organic Revenue Growth (ORG) 25% –
base and driving volumes
Delivering profit from our operations Profit Before Interest & Tax (PBIT) 55% –
Turning profit into cash Adjusted Free Cash Flow (AFCF) 15% 33.3%
Delivery against investments Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) – 33.3%
Effectiveness of our safety culture Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate (LTIFR) 2.5% –
Providing safe food and of the right quality Food Safety Incident Rate (FSIR) 2.5% –
Delivering returns for shareholders Total Shareholder Return (TSR) – 33.3%
1. Based on Group performance measures and LTIP based on the Plan vesting in year.
Governance
the current members of the Committee are set out on pages 70 of suggestions were made relating to the development of
and 71. Members of the Committee are appointed by the Board management incentives and the Committee agreed that these
following recommendation by the Nomination Committee. should be considered in the coming year in the context of the
next Policy review. To further enhance the effectiveness of the
Meetings attendance Committee, the priorities identified going forward were:
The Committee must meet at least twice a year. A quorum for a
meeting is two. • continuing to work with the executive team to evaluate
remuneration against the Company’s strategy and the
Only members of the Committee have the right to attend evolving external environment
Committee meetings. The Group General Counsel and Company • continuing to receive external input on key trends and
Secretary acts as Secretary to the Committee. The Group Chief developments in remuneration
People Officer and the Group Reward & Diversity Director attend
• maintaining an ongoing dialogue with investors and proxy
Committee meetings by invitation to advise the Committee on
advisory firms
Group policies and practice. Details of advisors to the Committee
• devoting more time to understanding compensation for the
can be found on page 121.
wider workforce beyond executive management
The Committee is authorised to seek information from any
As a result of these findings, appropriate arrangements have
employee of the Group to enable it to perform its duties and, if
been made within the Committee’s schedule for the coming year
necessary, at the expense of the Company, can obtain legal or
and an update on progress will be provided in next year’s report.
other independent professional advice on matters covered by its
terms of reference.
2018 2019
November March July
• reviewed salaries for the • received an overview of total • received an update on wider
Executive Committee effective remuneration for the global employee remuneration and
1 January 2019 leadership team employment practice
• determined 2017‑2018 • approved the Karen Witts • received an update on corporate
performance outcomes for the LTIP Restricted Share Award Plan governance from advisors
and bonus plans
May September
• approved draft DRR for 2017‑2018
• approved grant of LTIP and • reviewed updated terms of
• set targets under the LTIP and
Restricted Share awards for reference for the Committee
other incentive plans below
Ms Witts • reviewed the Chairman’s fee
Executive Committee for
2018‑2019 • reviewed LTIP awards for the global • considered the draft DRR for
leadership team 2018‑2019
• set targets for 2018‑2019
bonus plans • received an update on external
remuneration trends from advisors
STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF THE DIRECTORS’ • how the Policy approved by shareholders at the 2018 AGM
REMUNERATION REPORT (DRR) was implemented in the year ended 30 September 2019
This DRR has been prepared on behalf of the Board by the (the Annual Remuneration Report), the proposed approval of
Committee in accordance with the requirements of the an amendment to the operation of the Policy to replace the
Companies Act (CA 2006) and the Large and Medium-sized annual cap of £125,000 on the total fees payable to each
Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) non-executive director of the Company with the aggregate cap
Regulations 2013 (the 2013 Regulations). The policy on directors’ fees specified in the Company’s articles of
on remuneration of directors (the Policy) is set out on pages association and how the Policy will be implemented in the
103 to 109. The next two sections of the DRR cover the next financial year
following matters:
Governance
to apply until 2021.
The Committee considers that the targets set for the different
For unvested share awards only, made prior to components of performance related remuneration are both
8 February 2018, the provisions of the Remuneration Policy appropriate and sufficiently demanding in the context of the
approved by shareholders in 2015 will continue to apply until all business environment and the challenges which the Group faces
long term incentive awards granted under that Policy have as well as complying with the provisions of the Code.
vested or lapsed.
The Committee has the discretion to amend certain aspects of
The Committee reviewed the Company’s remuneration the Policy in exceptional circumstances when considered to be
philosophy and structure to ensure that remuneration supports in the best interests of shareholders. Should such discretion be
the Company’s strategic objectives, is in line with best practice used, this will be explained and reported in the DRR for the
and can fairly reward individuals for the contribution that they following year.
make to the business. In doing this, we have regard to the size
and complexity of the Group’s operations and the need to
motivate and attract employees of the highest calibre.
Component and
link to strategy Operation of component Maximum opportunity Performance measures
BENEFITS Benefits include, but are not The cost of providing these benefits None.
limited to, healthcare can vary in accordance with market
AND
insurance for executive conditions, which will, therefore,
PENSION directors and their determine the maximum value.
To provide a dependants, limited financial
competitive level For the Company’s pension cash
advice, life assurance and allowance (or pension contribution
of benefits. car benefit. as appropriate), from 8 February
These are offered to executive 2018 the annual maximum will be
directors as part of a 20% of base salary for new UK
competitive remuneration appointees and 35% phasing down
package. to 20% of base salary for current UK
Executive directors are invited based executive directors. The
to participate in the Company’s reduction will take place over a
defined contribution pension three year period commencing in
scheme or to take a cash January 2019. Dominic Blakemore
allowance in lieu of voluntarily elected to adopt the 20%
pension entitlement. rate of contribution from 1 January
2018. The annual maximum cash
allowance for Gary Green remains
at 35% of base salary.
ANNUAL The annual bonus is earned by The target award for the Group CEO Performance is measured over the financial year. Performance
the achievement of one year is 100% of base salary, with a measures are determined by the Committee each year and
BONUS
performance targets set by the further maximum of 100% for may vary to ensure that they promote the Company’s business
Incentivise and
Committee at the start of each enhanced performance. No bonus strategy and shareholder value.
reward the
financial year and is delivered is payable for below threshold The performance measures and their percentage weightings
achievement of
in cash or a combination of performance but increases on a may vary, depending upon a director’s area of responsibility.
stretching one
cash and Deferred Bonus straight line basis to target payout
year key Performance measures may include, but are not limited to,
Shares. and from target to maximum.
performance profit, revenue, margin and cash flow. Strategic KPIs may also
targets set by the The Committee retains the The target award for other be chosen. However, the overall metrics would always be
Committee at the discretion to adjust the bonus executive directors is 75% of base substantially weighted to financial measures.
start of each outcomes to ensure that they salary, with a further maximum of
reflect underlying 75% of base salary available for Annual bonus targets are set with reference to internal
financial year.
business performance. enhanced performance. No bonus budgets and analyst consensus forecasts, with maximum
is payable for below threshold payout requiring performance well ahead of budget.
The annual bonus is subject to
malus and/or clawback in the performance but increases on a A bonus underpin may be operated so that the bonus outcome
event of discovery of a material straight line basis to target payout is reduced if underpin performance is not met.
misstatement in the accounts and from target to maximum. Bonus will be deferred when share ownership guidelines have
or in the assessment of a not been met, usually with a minimum level of deferral of one
relevant performance third of the bonus earned and typically deferred for a period of
condition or where the action three years.
or conduct of a participant Dividend equivalents may be accrued on Deferred
amounts to fraud or serious Bonus Shares.
misconduct or has a
Details of the specific measures and targets applying to each
detrimental impact on the
element of the bonus for the year being reported on are shown
reputation of the Group.
in the Annual Remuneration Report on page 114.
LONG TERM INCENTIVE An annual conditional award of Awards may be made at the Performance is measured over three
ordinary shares which may be following levels of salary: financial years.
PLAN (LTIP)
earned after a single three year • Group Chief Executive: 300% Performance measures are AFCF,
Incentivise and reward executive
performance period, based on the • Other executive directors: 250%
Governance
directors for the delivery of longer ROCE and TSR, with each applying
achievement of stretching 40%, 40% and 20% respectively.
term financial performance and In exceptional circumstances, such
performance conditions. Executive
shareholder value. as the appointment of a new Relative TSR is measured relative to
directors normally hold vested LTIP
Share-based to provide alignment shares (net of any shares sold to executive director, this could be the companies comprising the TSR
with shareholder interests. meet tax and social security increased to 400% of base salary. comparator group at the start of the
liabilities) for a period of two years Any use of this exceptional limit period.
Return on capital employed would be appropriately explained.
post vesting. LTIP targets are set with reference to
(ROCE) For performance measures, other internal budgets and analysts’
ROCE supports the strategic focus Calculations of the achievement of
the targets are independently than TSR, 0% of the award vests for consensus forecasts, with maximum
on growth and margin through
performed and are approved by the below threshold performance, payment requiring performance well
ensuring that cash is reinvested to
Committee. To ensure continued increasing to 50% vesting on a ahead of budget.
generate strong returns with capital
alignment between executive straight line basis for achievement of Details of the targets for LTIP awards
discipline.
directors’ and shareholders’ on target performance, increasing to vesting and granted are set out as
Adjusted free cash flow interests, the Committee also maximum vesting on a straight line required in the Annual
(AFCF) reviews the underlying financial basis for achievement of maximum Remuneration Report on page 116.
The generation of cash is performance of the Group and performance.
For awards made prior to 8 February
fundamental to the ongoing success retains its discretion to adjust vesting The element of an award based on 2018, the awards were based on
of the Group and the use of AFCF as if it considers that performance is relative TSR will vest in full for top AFCF over the three year
an LTIP performance measure unsatisfactory. quartile performance achievement performance period, growth in ROCE
directly aligns to this. and 25% of that element of the and the Company’s TSR over the
Dividend equivalents may be
award will vest if performance is at
Relative total shareholder accrued on the shares earned from
the median. Awards will vest on a
performance period relative to the
LTIP awards. companies comprising the TSR
return (TSR) straight line basis between median
Malus and clawback rules operate in comparator group at the start of the
The third performance measure of and top quartile performance
respect of the LTIP. The Committee relevant period. Each measure
TSR provides direct alignment achievement. No shares will be
may decide at any time before an being equivalent to one third of
between the interests of executive released for this element of an award
award vests, or for a period of three the total award.
directors and shareholders. if the Company’s TSR performance
years after an award vests, that any is below the median.
participant will be subject to malus
and/or clawback in the event of
discovery of a material misstatement
in the accounts or in the assessment
of a relevant performance condition,
or where the action or conduct of a
participant amounts to fraud or
serious misconduct or has a
detrimental impact on the reputation
of the Group.
Awards are delivered in shares.
However, the rules contain excepted
provisions to deliver value in cash
if necessary (for example, due to
securities laws), subject to the
discretion of the Committee,
determined at any time up to
their release.
In the event of a change of
control, any unvested awards
will vest immediately, subject to
satisfaction of performance
conditions and reduction on a
time apportioned basis.
1.05%
1.05%
0.91%
8.04% 3.04%
0.91%
Headroom Headroom
Discretionary options Discretionary options
LTIP LTIP
Each of the bars is broken down to show how the total under each scenario is made up of fixed elements of remuneration, the annual
bonus and the LTIP.
Governance
Dominic Blakemore Gary Green1
ILLUSTRATION OF PACKAGE ILLUSTRATION OF PACKAGE
Karen Witts
ILLUSTRATION OF PACKAGE
1. Gary Green is paid in US dollars. For reporting purposes, this pay is converted into sterling at an exchange rate of US$1.2762/£1 as used elsewhere in the
Annual Report.
2. Based on AFCF and ROCE performance measures vesting at 50% of maximum and the TSR measure paying out at 62.5% of maximum (midway between
threshold and maximum payout).
No share price growth or dividend accrual has been incorporated in the values relating to the LTIP.
Governance
justified, for example, by reference to performance prior to the Corporate Responsibility Committee and an additional fee of
date of leaving. The malus and clawback provisions would £30,000 per annum was also payable to the director nominated
continue to apply in the event that any such discretion as Senior Independent Director (SID). These fees remain
was exercised. unchanged for the coming year. Non-executive directors are
not eligible for pension scheme membership, bonus, incentive
Service contracts outline the components of remuneration paid arrangements or other benefits, save reimbursement of
to the individual but do not prescribe how remuneration levels travel costs.
may be adjusted from year to year.
As more fully described in the Notice of Meeting on pages 235
The senior executives who are members of the Executive and 238, at our 2019 AGM, we received shareholder approval to
Committee, and who are referred to in note 4 to the pay the full fee to each non-executive director in respect of each
consolidated financial statements on page 166, have similar non-executive role they perform for the Company without regard
service contracts. to the annual cap of £125,000 as set out in the Policy. We have
reviewed this element of how we operate our Policy and, as a
The executive directors in office at the date of this DRR have
result of that review, we concluded that it would be more
served on the Board for the periods shown below and have
appropriate to set the cap on directors’ fees by reference to the
service agreements dated as follows:
aggregate cap in the Company’s articles of association approved
Length of Board by shareholders in 2017. No other changes are proposed to the
service as at Company’s overall approach to the payment of fees to non-
Executive director Date of contract 30 Sep 2019
executive directors, as set out in the shareholder approved Policy.
Dominic Blakemore 12 Dec 2011 7 years,
7 Nov 20171 7 months Non-executive directors have letters of engagement setting out
Gary Green 29 Dec 2006 12 years, their duties and the time commitment expected. They are
27 Nov 20072 9 months appointed for an initial period of three years, after which the
Karen Witts 10 Oct 20183 5 months appointment is renewable at three year intervals by mutual
consent. In accordance with the Code, all directors offer
1. Appointment was formally revised from 1 October 2017. themselves for annual re-election by shareholders. Details of the
2. Appointment was formally revised from 1 November 2007.
3. Ms Witts was appointed to the Board as Group CFO with effect from appointments of non-executive directors (in office at the date of
8 April 2019. this DRR) which are terminable without compensation are set out
in the table below, together with the dates on which their
CHAIRMAN
appointments have been formally revised:
The fee for the Chairman is reviewed annually by the Committee
with any increase taking effect on 1 October. The Chairman is Total length
not eligible for pension scheme membership, bonus or incentive Original of service
Non-executive date of Letter of as at
arrangements. Costs in relation to business and commuting director appointment engagement 30 Sep 2019
travel will be reimbursed. The Chairman’s appointment is
Carol Arrowsmith 1 Jun 2014 14 May 2014 5 years,
terminable without compensation on six months’ notice from
8 Mar 2017* 4 months
either side. Following a market review and consideration by the
John Bason 21 Jun 2011 10 May 2011 8 years,
Committee, from 1 October 2019 the Chairman’s fee was
8 May 2014* 3 months
increased from £560,000 to £575,000 per annum.
8 Mar 2017*
The Chairman has a letter of engagement dated 19 June 2013 Stefan Bomhard 5 May 2016 5 May 2016 3 years,
in respect of his original appointment as a non-executive 13 Mar 2019* 4 months
director for a period of three years from 1 January 2014. John Bryant 1 Sep 2018 17 May 2018 1 year,
Mr Walsh became Chairman at the conclusion of the Company’s 1 month
AGM on 6 February 2014. Mr Walsh will complete his second Anne-Francoise 1 Jul 2018 17 May 2018 1 year,
three year term as Chairman on 6 February 2020. At the Nesmes 3 months
recommendation of the Nomination Committee, his term was Nelson Silva 16 Jul 2015 16 Jul 2015 4 years,
extended on 18 September 2019 for a further three year term 8 Mar 2018* 2 months
until February 2023. Ireena Vittal 16 Jul 2015 16 Jul 2015 4 years,
8 Mar 2018* 2 months
700
600
500
400
300
200
Compass
FTSE 100 100
(rebased) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
(September)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 20181 20192
Single total figure 5,614 4,410 4,867 5,532 6,298 5,325 5,822 5,617 4,5683 4,659
of remuneration
£000
Annual variable element: 96.0 75.0 71.8 84.5 87.3 88.7 85.8 68.9 95.9 78.3
award payout against
maximum opportunity
%
LTIP vesting rates 100 100 100 98.0 100 79.0 84.5 74.5 95.0 100
against maximum
opportunity
%
1. Mr Blakemore was Deputy Group CEO from 1 October 2017 to 31 December 2017 and Group CEO from 1 January 2018 to 30 September 2018.
2. Includes indicative LTIP vesting of £1.951 million calculated by reference to the average market price of Compass Group PLC shares over the three months
from 1 July 2019 to 30 September 2019 of £20.21.
3. LTIP indicative vesting amount of £1.853 million was disclosed in the 2018 Annual Report and Accounts. Actual amount was £1.898 million.
Governance
Dividends paid3 611 548 11.4
For the year ended 30 September 2019, all full-time equivalent Total employee costs4 11,370 10,556 7.7
employees based in the UK received 3.5% more in salary, 5.8%
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated upon adoption of IFRS 15.
less in bonus and 4.9% less in taxable benefits compared to the 2. At the AGM on 7 February 2019, shareholders approved resolution 21 to
equivalent amounts for the year ended 30 September 2018. The give the directors authority to make limited on market purchases of up to
UK employee workforce was chosen as the most suitable 10% of the Company’s ordinary shares. No shares were repurchased
during the financial year ended 30 September 2019. However, the
comparator group as the individual undertaking the Group CEO directors consider it desirable for such general authority to be available to
role has been based in the UK during each relevant year and pay maintain an efficient capital structure whilst at the same time retaining the
changes across the Group vary widely depending on local flexibility to fund any bolt-on acquisitions.
3. The total dividend paid during the year ended 30 September 2018 was
market conditions. The nature of the Group CEO’s global role £548 million. The total share capital in issue on 30 September 2018
and responsibilities makes meaningful comparisons with any was 1,589 million ordinary shares of 111⁄20 pence. At the date of this
report there were 1,589,736,625 ordinary shares of 111⁄20 pence in issue
group of employees difficult and due caution should be of which 3,301,961 were held in Treasury for the purpose of satisfying
exercised in this regard. the Company’s obligations under employee equity incentive schemes.
Shares held in treasury are not eligible to participate in dividends and do
The CEO pay ratio will be published in next year’s report in not carry any voting rights. The total dividend paid during the year ended
30 September 2019 was £611 million and the share capital in issue
line with the timing of the regulatory requirement to do so. on 30 September 2019 was 1,589 million ordinary shares of 111⁄20 pence
This timing aligns to the next Policy review and the year in each. The total dividend per ordinary share for the year ended
30 September 2019 increased by 6.1%.
which we will report on regulatory-driven changes on broader
4. Total employee costs include wages and salaries, social security costs,
considerations of the wider workforce employment. share-based payments and pension costs for all employees, including
directors. The average number of employees, including directors and
part-time employees in operations during 2019, was 596,452
(2018: 595,841).
1. Dominic Blakemore’s base salary was increased from £750,000 to £900,000 with effect from 1 January 2018 following his appointment as Group CEO on
1 January 2018, and subsequently increased from £900,000 to £975,000 on 1 January 2019.
2. Gary Green’s base salary of US$1,442,000 and his other emoluments are shown in sterling at an exchange rate of US$1.2762/£1 (2018: US$1.3479/£1).
In US$ terms Mr Green’s base salary was paid at the annual rate of US$1,399,590 from 1 January 2018 and $1,442,000 from 1 January 2019, being an
increase of 3%.
3. Johnny Thomson ceased to be a director on 31 December 2018. As set out in his Section 430(2B) Companies Act 2006 Statement published on the
Company’s website, in line with the current Policy, Mr Thomson received his current base salary of £658,000, 35% pension cash allowance and benefits to
this date. For the period from 1 January 2019 to 24 February 2019 he received a payment in lieu of notice (comprising salary, pension allowance and 10%
of his base salary in lieu of benefits) subject to an obligation to mitigate. From 25 February 2019 to 30 June 2019, a reduced payment was paid following
Mr Thomson mitigating his remuneration. The amounts shown in relation to 2019 in respect of salary and benefits are amounts paid during the year,
pro-rated by reference to the period during which he was an executive director of the Company. All of Mr Thomson’s extant LTIP awards lapsed when he
ceased to be a director on 31 December 2018. Mr Thomson was not eligible for an annual bonus payment in respect of 2018‑2019.
4. Karen Witts commenced employment as Group CFO on 8 April 2019. On joining, Ms Witts received an annual remuneration package which included a base
salary of £660,000, bonus opportunity of up to 150% of base salary, prorated from her joining date for the first financial year and standard contractual
benefits including pension payments (cash allowance or contribution) equal to 20% of base salary. Ms Witts’ compensation is in line with the arrangements
announced on 11 October 2018.
5. Taxable benefits comprise healthcare insurance, limited financial advice, life assurance and car benefit.
6. In accordance with the Policy, a pension cash allowance of 35% of base salary was paid in monthly instalments in lieu of pension participation for
Messrs Green and Thomson. From 1 October 2017 to 31 December 2017, Mr Blakemore received a pension cash allowance of 35%. Mr Blakemore
voluntarily elected to adopt the 20% rate of contribution from 1 January 2018 following his promotion to Group CEO.
7. Details of the performance measures and weighting as well as the achieved results for the bonus and LTIP components are shown on pages 114 to 116.
8. The amount shown for the award vesting in 2019 is the indicative value based on the average market price of Compass Group PLC shares over the three
month period from 1 July 2019 to 30 September 2019 (£20.21) of LTIP awards that have become receivable as a result of the achievement of performance
conditions relating to the three year performance period to 30 September 2019. The amount shown for the comparative figure in 2018 is the indicative value
based on the average market price of Compass Group PLC shares over the three month period from 1 July to 30 September 2018 (£16.46). On 21 November
2018, Messrs Blakemore, Green and Thomson sold 52,612, 63,035 and 47,009 shares to settle tax and social security obligations for which they received
£887,222, £1,062,990 and £792,736 respectively, based on a sale price of £16.86 on that date. Theoretically, if they had sold all of their vested awards,
they would have received in aggregate £5,981,009, approximately £142,000 more than the indicative value reported in the comparative table in last
year’s report.
9. Ms Witts was granted an award over 62,973 shares under the Karen Witts Restricted Share Award Plan on 16 May 2019 in recognition of awards forfeited at
her previous employer. 15,181 shares subject only to employment and 5,622 shares subject to financial underpins relating to net debt to underlying EBITDA
ratio and the ordinary dividend being at least in line with constant currency underlying basic earnings per share, vested on 1 July 2019. On the same day,
Ms Witts sold 9,808 shares for £18.94 per share to cover resultant tax and social security obligations. The remaining shares are not subject to a further
holding period, but will count towards her achievement of the share ownership guideline. The balance of the Award will vest, subject to continued
employment and financial underpins, in two further tranches on 1 July 2020 and 1 July 2021.
10. Richard Cousins was Group CEO until 31 December 2017. Total remuneration for 2018-2019 was nil (2018: £4,269 million)
Governance
1. Dominic Blakemore’s salary was reviewed in line with the commitment made in 2017 and 2018 to make increases to reflect experience and progression in
the role to bring his salary in line with that of his FTSE peers and reflects performance in the year. With effect from 1 January 2019, his salary was increased
to £975,000 with adjustments thereafter to be consistent with the range applicable to the wider workforce.
2. Karen Witts’ salary on commencement of employment was £660,000.
3. Johnny Thomson’s salary was reviewed in January 2018. No further salary review occurred following this date.
The proposed annual rate of base salaries of the executive directors in office from 1 January 2020 will be:
Director Base salary Effective date Increase Reason
Dominic Blakemore £1,000,000 1 January 2020 2.6% Relevant peer/market & performance
Gary Green $1,486,000 1 January 2020 3.1% Relevant peer/market & performance
Karen Witts £674,000 1 January 2020 2.1% Relevant peer/market & performance
Each director received a salary increase in line with those applied to the wider workforce in their respective geographies.
PENSIONS
At 30 September 2019, there were no executive directors actively participating in any Compass Group defined benefit pension
arrangements and none of the executive directors were accruing additional entitlement to benefit under any arrangements that
existed prior to their appointment as executive directors.
For the year under review a pension cash allowance equal to 20% of base salary for Mr Blakemore and Ms Witts and 35% of the base
salary for Messrs Green and Thomson was paid monthly in lieu of pension for the period of employment.
As was the case for previous years, the measurement of the achievement of the AFCF and PBIT results is based on the underlying
outcome achieved in the financial year, with gains/losses attributable to currency movements, charges and the impacts of
restructuring and/or acquisitions/disposals usually being excluded.
Gary Green
Financial measures1 % Weighting Minimum Par (target) Maximum Achieved
PBIT2,4 5 £1,774.2m £1,810.4m £1,846.6m £1,821.4m
RPBIT6 55 5.3% 6.3% 7.3% 7.9%
MAWC7 15 $(505.3)m $(525.3)m $(535.3)m $(556.2)m
RORG8 25 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 7.7%
2018‑2019 OUTCOMES
Dominic Blakemore Gary Green Karen Witts
% of performance % of performance % of performance
Measure target achieved target achieved target achieved
PBIT/RPBIT2,4,6 35.8/55 2,4 58.3/60 2,4,6 35.8/55 2,4
AFCF3 15/15 – 15/15
MAWC7 – 15/15 –
ORG/RORG5,8 25/25 5 25/25 8 25/25 5
HSE 2.5/5 – 2.5/5
Total 78.3/100 98.3/100 78.3/100
1. Financial targets for 2018‑2019 bonus purposes are all set and measured at 2019 foreign exchange budget rates, not actuals.
2. PBIT is underlying Profit Before Interest and Tax (Group).
3. AFCF is Adjusted Free Cash Flow (Group).
4. Messrs Blakemore and Green’s and Ms Witts’ entitlements to any bonus related to the achievement of PBIT were adjusted, in accordance with the
established framework, to exclude all unbudgeted M&A spend together with routine restructuring costs.
5. ORG is Organic Revenue Growth (Group).
6. RPBIT is underlying Profit Before Interest and Tax growth improvement for the North America region.
7. MAWC is Average Working Capital Balance for the North America region for Mr Green. The 2018‑2019 target for Mr Green for MAWC is based on an
improvement in the value of MAWC over the designated period.
8. RORG is Organic Revenue Growth for the North America region
9. Whilst the LTIFR target was achieved, Mr Blakemore’s and Ms Witts’ entitlements to bonus relating to the achievement of the LTIFR target were reduced to
zero to recognise that the Group had suffered a fatality in South Africa during the year which occurred whilst the employee had been at work, albeit that
management were not considered to be culpable. This recognises the seriousness with which the Company takes HSE outcomes.
2018‑2019 PAYOUTS
The outcome of the annual bonus for the year ended 30 September 2019 was due to the continued strong underlying financial
performance aligned with the delivery of the Group’s long term strategy. The table below shows the resulting payout to each
executive director for the year:
2018‑2019 bonus payment as
% of base salary as at 30 Sep 2019 Value of bonus
Dominic Blakemore 156.6% £1,526,951
Gary Green 147.4% US$2,125,256
Karen Witts 56.6% £373,805
No discretion was applied by the Committee in respect of the directors’ bonuses for the year under review. The bonus for Messrs
Blakemore and Green will be paid in cash as they have each met their share ownership guideline. The bonus for Ms Witts has been
prorated for the period of employment in the financial year from 8 April 2019 to 30 September 2019. A third of the bonus will be
deferred in shares for a period of three years in order to support the build up towards Ms Witts’ share ownership guideline. Dividend
equivalents may be accrued on Deferred Bonus Shares in line with the Policy.
Governance
HSE7 5% –7 5%
Total8 100% 100% 100%
The Committee has set the targets for the annual bonus plan for the year ending 30 September 2020 but has chosen not to disclose
the details in this DRR, as it is the opinion of the Committee that it may be seriously prejudicial to the interests of the Company to do
so. However, the specific targets and the extent to which the targets have been met (both at Group and Regional levels) will be
disclosed in next year’s DRR.
1. Face value of award as at the date of grant on 21 November 2018 is based on the closing market price of £16.73 per share on 20 November 2018.
2. Face value of award is converted to sterling at an exchange rate of US$1.2762/£1.
3. Face value of award as at the date of grant on 16 May 2019 is based on the closing market price of £17.78 per share on 15 May 2019. The Award relates to
the annual LTIP grant. Ms Witts also received awards in respect of forfeiture of incentives from her previous employer. These awards are set out in detail on
page 118.
Executive directors are required to hold vested awards for a period of two years following vesting so as to further strengthen the long
term alignment of executives’ remuneration packages with shareholders’ interests and, if required, to facilitate the implementation
of provisions related to clawback.
The table below sets out the performance measures for the awards under the Policy in operation during the financial year
under review:
Definition of measure
ROCE The definition aims to measure the underlying economic performance of the Company. ROCE is calculated at the end of the
three year performance period as net underlying operating profit after tax (NOPAT) divided by 12 month average capital employed
(see page 246 for full definitions).
Adjusted FCF The definition aims to measure the cash generation of the Company and is calculated as the three year cumulative
underlying FCF (see page 246 for full definition) adjusted for constant currency.
TSR Performance is compared to that of constituent members of the FTSE 100 (excluding the financial services sector). TSR is the
aggregate of share price growth and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment of those dividends in the Company’s shares during the
three year performance period).
In setting the performance targets, the Committee considers internal budgets and the Group’s strategic plan, market expectations
and general economic conditions. The table on page 116 shows the targets against which performance has been measured to
determine the vesting of the grant of awards for the year ended 30 September 2019 and forms part of the Policy detailed in the
Policy Report on pages 62 to 68 of the 2016 Annual Report and Accounts.
2016‑2017 award targets (for awards with a performance period ended 30 September 2019)
ROCE target
Level of performance Threshold Maximum Achieved
Vesting % of component 0% 100% 100%
As at date of award 18.1% 19.1% –
Reconciled at the end of the performance period1 18.18% 19.15% 19.73%
AFCF target
Level of performance Threshold Maximum Achieved
Vesting % of each component 0% 100% 100%
AFCF £2,609m £2,883m £3,156m
1. ROCE targets are updated at the end of the performance period to reflect actual acquisition spend and constant currency.
Each of the performance measures were met in full at the end of the three year performance period, such that the LTIP awards made
during the 2016‑2017 financial year vested at 100% of the maximum. Shares will be delivered to individuals following the release of
the preliminary results for the year ended 30 September 2019.
Performance conditions Value of
TSR % ROCE % AFCF % Number of Number of shares
vested vested vested shares shares on vesting2
Director on maturity1 on maturity on maturity awarded vested £000
Dominic Blakemore 100% 100% 100% 96,528 96,528 1,951
Gary Green 100% 100% 100% 137,271 137,271 2,774
1. TSR ranking was 16th in its comparator group.
2. The indicative value of the shares on vesting has been calculated by reference to the average market price of Compass Group PLC shares over the three
months from 1 July 2019 to 30 September 2019 of £20.21 per share.
2019‑2020 AWARD
The table below shows the targets against which performance will be measured to determine the vesting of the grant of awards to
be made in the year ending 30 September 2020 and forms part of the Policy detailed in the Policy Report on pages 103 to 109. In
order to minimise future adjustments, the Committee sets ROCE targets based on predicted spend on bolt-on acquisitions, however,
in line with our standard approach, targets will be updated at the end of the performance period to reflect actual spend. In setting
AFCF targets, the Committee took into consideration anticipated payroll timing and taxation phasing during the three year
performance period. The targets have been set on an IFRS 15 basis and will be restated for IFRS 16 in the 2020 Directors’
Remuneration Report.
TSR target
Vesting %
of each
Level of performance component
Below Median 0%
Median 25%
Upper Quartile 100%
The Committee considers the measures and targets set in respect of 2019‑2020 to be appropriate and challenging. Calculations of
the achievement of the targets will be independently performed and approved by the Committee. The Committee retains discretion
Governance
to adjust for performance and the nature of any such adjustments will be disclosed in the DRR, together with details of the achieved
ROCE, AFCF and TSR performance, as determined by the above definitions, at the end of the performance period.
1. Face value of award as at the date of grant on 16 May 2019 is based on the closing market price of £17.78 per share on 15 May 2019. The award is subject
to Compass’ performance over the three year period ending 30 September 2021 as assessed by the Remuneration Committee against ROCE, AFCF and
relative TSR performance targets as applied.
2. Face value of award as at the date of grant on 16 May 2019 is based on the closing market price of £17.78 per share on 15 May 2019. The award of 15,181
shares vested on 1 July 2019.
3. Face value of award as at the date of grant on 16 May 2019 is based on the closing market price of £17.78 pence per share on 15 May 2019. The award is
subject to two financial underpins relating to net debt to underlying EBITDA ratio and the ordinary dividend being at least in line with constant currency
underlying basic earnings per share. The award is to vest in three tranches. The first tranche of 5,622 shares vested on 1 July 2019. A maximum of 20,804
shares are due to vest in July 2020 and 21,366 shares are due to vest in July 2021, each being subject to the two financial underpins.
LTIP
As at Awarded during Released during Lapsed during As at Market price
30 Sep 2018: the year: the year: the year: 30 Sep 2019: at date
number of number of number of number of number of of award: Date of Maturity
Director shares shares shares shares shares £ award date
Dominic 118,518 – 112,550 5,968 – 10.80 25 Nov 2015 1 Oct 2018
Blakemore 96,528 – – – 96,528 13.26 23 Nov 2016 1 Oct 2019
178,390 – – – 178,390 15.13 9 Feb 2018 1 Oct 2020
– 161,385 – – 161,385 16.73 21 Nov 2018 1 Oct 2021
Total 393,436 161,385 112,550 5,968 436,303
Gary 148,479 – 141,002 7,477 – 10.80 25 Nov 2015 1 Oct 2018
Green 137,271 – – – 137,271 13.26 23 Nov 2016 1 Oct 2019
165,125 – – – 165,125 15.13 9 Feb 2018 1 Oct 2020
– 162,810 – – 162,810 16.73 21 Nov 2018 1 Oct 2021
Total 450,875 162,810 141,002 7,477 465,206
Karen – 120,880 – – 120,880 17.78 16 May 2019 1 Oct 2021
Witts
Total – 120,880 – – 120,880
Johnny 106,482 – 101,120 5,362 – 10.80 25 Nov 2015 1 Oct 2018
Thomson 86,724 – – 86,724 – 13.26 23 Nov 2016 1 Oct 2019
108,685 – – 108,685 – 15.13 9 Feb 2018 1 Oct 2020
Total 301,891 – 101,120 200,771 –
NOTES TO TABLES
1. Each award granted is based on a three year performance period. Under the 2010 LTIP, awards are based one third on a ROCE target, one third on AFCF and
one third on the Company’s TSR relative to the FTSE 100, excluding the financial services sector. Awards granted under the 2018 LTIP are based 40% on a
ROCE target, 40% on an AFCF target and 20% on the Company’s TSR relative to the FTSE 100, excluding the financial services sector.
2. The performance period of the award granted on 25 November 2015 came to an end on 30 September 2018. This award vested in part at 95% of the
maximum award. The shares disclosed as lapsed during the year represent the proration of the original award.
3. Awards granted on 9 February 2018, 21 November 2018 and 16 May 2019 were made under the LTIP 2018. All other awards were granted under the
LTIP 2010.
4. On 21 November 2018, Messrs Blakemore, Green and Thomson sold 52,612, 63,065 and 47,009 shares respectively of LTIP awards that had become
receivable as a result of the achievement of performance conditions relating to the three year performance period to 30 September 2018 to settle resultant
tax and social security obligations. All of the vested LTIP awards were subject to a two year post vest holding period. Theoretically, if the directors had sold all
of their vested LTIP awards, they would have received in aggregate £5,981,009 based on a sale price of £16.86 on 21 November 2018. The closing share
price on the day preceding the release of their awards was £16.73 per share.
5. The performance period of the award granted on 23 November 2016 came to an end on 30 September 2019. The award vested in full.
6. All LTIP awards were granted for nil consideration.
7. Of the 120,880 LTIP awards granted to Ms Witts, 28,110 were in respect of the agreed buy-out arrangement for awards forfeited in her former employment.
8. Awards granted to Mr Thomson on 23 November 2016 and 9 February 2018 lapsed on 31 December 2018 when he ceased to be a director of the Company.
9. Ms Witts was granted an award over 62,973 shares under the Karen Witts Restricted Share Award Plan on 16 May 2019 in recognition of Awards forfeited at
her previous employer. 15,181 shares were subject only to employment and 5,622 shares are subject to financial underpins relating to net debt to underlying
EBITDA ratio and the ordinary dividend being at least in line with constant currency underlying basic earnings per share, vested on 1 July 2019. On the same
day, Ms Witts sold 9,808 shares for £18.94 per share to cover resultant tax and social security obligations. The balance of shares is not subject to a further
holding period, but will count towards her achievement of the share ownership guideline. The balance of the Award will vest, subject to continued
employment and financial underpins, in two further tranches on 1 July 2020 and 1 July 2021.
10. The highest mid-market price of the Company’s ordinary shares during the year ended 30 September 2019 was £21.38 per share and the lowest was £14.83
per share. The year end price was £20.93 per share.
11. The market price at the date of each award is shown to two decimal places.
Governance
• an award of 250% of base salary under the LTIP 2018. This will vest based on performance over a three year performance period
as assessed by the Remuneration Committee, against ROCE, AFCF and relative TSR targets. The award will also be subject to a
two year post vest holding period
• standard contractual benefits including pension payments (cash allowance or contribution) equal to 20% of base salary
The Company also agreed the following buyout arrangements to compensate for the forfeiture of incentive compensation from
Ms Witts’ former employment, based on all known information at the time. The recruitment Policy approved by shareholders sets out
how to determine the buyout of outstanding incentives from a previous employer, namely, that awards should minimise the cost to
Compass and, where possible, should deliver any compensation in the form of Compass shares, delivered no earlier than the original
awards. In line with that policy, the buyout of current share-based incentives is a blend of restricted shares and performance shares
to replicate the form of awards forfeit. The timing of the payouts will be no earlier than the awards forfeited, and all awards will be
made in Compass shares with forward looking performance conditions applying where appropriate:
• an award of performance shares worth £500,000 which will vest subject to Compass’ performance over the three year period
ending 30 September 2021 as assessed by the Remuneration Committee, against ROCE, AFCF and relative TSR performance
targets as applied under the LTIP 2018
• an award of restricted shares with a value at the date of grant of £1,120,000 to vest in three approximately equal tranches over the
three financial years ending 30 September 2019‑2021. The majority of the award is also subject to two financial underpins relating
to Compass’ performance, which are (i) the maintenance of net debt: underlying EBITDA (adjusted for M&A activity and changes
to accounting standards) and (ii) dividend at least in line with constant currency basic earnings per share
All net shares vesting must be retained until the Company’s share ownership guidelines for executive directors have been met.
At the time of appointment Ms Witts was expected to receive compensation, to be delivered in Compass shares, for the loss of any
2018‑2019 annual bonus equal in value to the actual bonus that would have been paid by her former employer. This award was not
granted as her 2018‑2019 annual bonus from her former employer was not forfeit.
Details of the amounts received by each of the non-executive directors in office for the year ended 30 September 2019 are set out below:
Fees Benefits1 Total 2019 Total 20182
Non-executive director £000 £000 £000 £000
Carol Arrowsmith 116 10 126 125
John Bason3 139 – 139 119
Stefan Bomhard 86 1 87 85
John Bryant4 86 18 104 7
Anne-Francoise Nesmes5 86 – 86 21
Nelson Silva 116 16 132 119
Ireena Vittal 86 11 97 97
1. Travel costs relating to attending Board meetings held in the UK are treated as a taxable benefit and have been included in the table above.
2. 2018 figures restated to include travel expenses.
3. With effect from 8 February 2019, Mr Bason was paid the full fee payable for each non-executive role performed.
4. Appointed to the Board and its committees on 1 September 2018.
5. Appointed to the Board and its committees on 1 July 2018.
The Committee reviewed and noted that the guidelines were satisfied by all directors in office during the year. The interests of the
directors in office during the year ended 30 September 2019 in shares (including the interests of Persons Closely Associated) and
share incentives are shown in the table below:
Beneficial Conditional
LTIP/RSA LTIP/RSA
Shares held as Shares held holdings as holdings Compliance with
at 30 Sep 2019 as at 30 Sep at 30 Sep 2019 as at 30 Sep Shareholding share ownership
Director or date of leaving 2018 or date of leaving 2018 required1
guidelines
Carol Arrowsmith 10,333 10,121 n/a n/a 100% P
John Bason 14,288 11,976 n/a n/a 100% P
Dominic Blakemore 197,462 137,524 436,303 393,436 300% P
Stefan Bomhard 5,865 5,865 n/a n/a 100% P
John Bryant2 6,025 – n/a n/a 100% P
Gary Green 191,382 255,595 465,206 450,875 250% P
Anne-Francoise Nesmes3 2,122 – n/a n/a 100% P
Nelson Silva 7,884 7,884 n/a n/a 100% P
Johnny Thomson4 209,521 155,410 – 301,891 250% P
Ireena Vittal 5,350 5,241 n/a n/a 100% P
Paul Walsh 35,395 35,395 n/a n/a 100% P
Karen Witts5 10,995 – 163,050 n/a 250% See note 5
There were no changes in directors’ interests between 30 September 2019 and 26 November 2019.
REMUNERATION ADVICE
Governance
The Chairman and the Group CEO, together with the Group Chief People Officer and the Group Reward & Diversity Director are
normally invited to attend each Committee meeting and provide advice and guidance to the Committee (other than in respect of
their own remuneration) for which they are not paid a fee in addition to their remuneration from the Company under their service
contracts. Details of the members of the Committee who served during the year ended 30 September 2019 are set out on
pages 70 and 71.
WillisTowersWatson (WTW) was appointed by the Company in 2017. During the year, WTW advised the Committee on remuneration
related matters in respect of the executive directors and non-executive directors including detailed external information and
research on market data and trends and advice in relation to the appointment of Ms Witts for which it received total fees (based on
hours spent) of £30,150 (2018: £29,100). WTW provided services to the Company globally which comprised remuneration
benchmarking, insurance brokerage and other consultancy advice.
Alithos Limited (Alithos) was appointed by the Company in 2002. During the year, Alithos provided information for the testing of the
TSR performance conditions for the Company’s LTIP awards, for which it received fixed fees of £24,000 (2018: £24,000). It also
provided the TSR performance graph for the DRR, for which it received a fixed fee of £500 (2018: £500). Alithos did not provide any
other advice or services to the Company during the year.
The Committee is satisfied that the advice it received during the year was objective and independent, based on the experience of its
members generally, including Carol Arrowsmith, Chairman of the Committee, who was formerly a remuneration consultant with
Deloitte LLP.
2018
Number of votes
‘For’ & % of Number of votes % of Total number of Number of votes
‘Discretionary’ votes cast ‘Against’ votes cast votes cast ‘Withheld’1
Remuneration Policy2 1,153,741,571 95.90 49,370,003 4.10 1,203,111,574 10,721,950
Annual Remuneration Report3 1,161,167,059 96.58 41,072,852 3.42 1,202,239,911 11,593,421
2019
Number of votes
‘For’ & % of Number of votes % of Total number of Number of votes
‘Discretionary’ votes cast ‘Against’ votes cast votes cast ‘Withheld’1
Annual Remuneration Report3 1,225,182,253 98.01 24,889,504 1.99 1,250,071,757 15,061,643
The Committee welcomed the endorsement of the DRR by shareholders and took steps, wherever practicable, to understand
shareholders’ concerns when withholding their support.
At the 2020 AGM, shareholders will be invited to vote on the Annual Remuneration Report for 2018‑2019 (advisory vote) and on the
approval for the Company to pay each of its non-executive directors the full fee payable for each role they perform for the Company
by reference to the aggregate cap on directors’ fees specified in the Company’s articles of association.
Carol Arrowsmith
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
Governance
www.compass-group.com. this by a further one third of the Company’s issued ordinary
share capital, provided that such amount shall only be used in
REPURCHASE OF SHARES
connection with a rights issue. If approved, the authority will
No shares were repurchased during the financial year ended
expire no later than 15 months from the date on which the
30 September 2019. No shares have been repurchased in the
resolution is passed, or at the conclusion of the Company’s 2021
period from 1 October 2019 to the date of this Report.
AGM, whichever is the sooner.
As at the date of this Report, there are 1,589,736,625 ordinary
The limited power granted to the directors at the 2019 AGM to
shares of 111⁄20 pence in issue. Of these, 3,301,961 are held in
allot equity shares for cash, other than pro rata to existing
treasury for the purpose of satisfying the Company’s obligations
shareholders, expires no later than 6 May 2020. Subject to the
under employee equity incentive schemes. Shares held in
terms of the section 551 authority, this authority is in line with
treasury are not eligible to participate in dividends and do not
the Statement of Principles on Pre-emption Rights issued by the
carry any voting rights.
Pre-Emption Group and supported by the Investment
Returns to shareholders continue to be an integral part of our Association and the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association
business model and the Group’s cash flow generation remains (the Principles). If granted, this authority will give the directors
excellent. Our priorities for how we use our cash are to: (i) invest the ability (until the 2021 AGM) to issue ordinary shares for
in the business to support organic growth where we see cash, other than pro rata to existing shareholders, in connection
opportunities with good returns; (ii) grow the dividend in line with with a rights issue or up to a limit of 5% of the issued ordinary
underlying constant currency earnings per share; (iii) pursue share capital (whether or not in connection with an acquisition
M&A opportunities; our preference is for small to medium sized or specified capital investment) calculated at the latest
bolt-on acquisitions, where we look for returns greater than our practicable date prior to the publication of the Notice of AGM. In
cost of capital by the end of year two; and (iv) maintain strong accordance with the Principles, the directors propose to extend
investment grade credit ratings returning any surplus cash to this by an additional 5% of the Company’s issued ordinary share
shareholders to target net debt to EBITDA of around 1.5x1. capital calculated at the latest practicable date prior to the
publication of the Notice of AGM, provided that the additional
At the 2020 AGM, a special resolution will be proposed to renew authority would only be used for the purpose of an acquisition or
the directors’ limited authority (last granted at the 2019 AGM) to a specified capital investment which is announced
repurchase ordinary shares in the market. Retaining the ability contemporaneously with the issue or which has taken place in
to repurchase shares gives the Board the flexibility of electing to the preceding six month period and is disclosed in the
repurchase shares where this is the most effective method of announcement of the issue. In line with recommended best
returning cash to shareholders, or to fund bolt-on acquisitions. practice, the Company has split the disapplication of pre-
The directors consider it desirable for this general authorisation emption rights authority into two separate resolutions. The first
to be renewed in order to assist in maintaining the most efficient resolution seeks authorisation for 5% of the issued ordinary
capital structure for the business. share capital to be issued on an unrestricted basis, whilst the
second resolution seeks authority for an additional 5% of the
The authority sets the minimum and maximum prices which may issued ordinary share capital to be used for an acquisition or a
be paid and it will be limited to a maximum of 10% of the specified capital investment.
Company’s issued ordinary share capital calculated at the latest
practicable date prior to the publication of the Notice of AGM. Also, in line with best practice, the Company has not issued
Any purchases of ordinary shares will be by means of market more than 7.5% of its issued ordinary share capital on a
purchases through the London Stock Exchange and any shares non-prorated basis over the last three years. The directors have
purchased may be cancelled or placed into treasury in no present intention to issue ordinary shares, other than
accordance with Section 724 of the CA 2006. pursuant to the Company’s employee equity incentive share
schemes, and this authority will maintain the Company’s
1. Pre IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. IFRS 16 will be adopted by the Group on 1 October
2019. The Group expects between £950-£1,050 million of additional debt flexibility in relation to future share issues, including any issues
on its balance sheet on adoption. to finance business opportunities, should appropriate
circumstances arise.
Details of purchases and releases by the ASST, and the reissue Company’s internal websites, on matters affecting them as
of treasury shares during the year, together with details of employees and on the issues affecting their performance. Group
options granted over unissued capital, are set out in the businesses in the European Economic Area (EEA) are
consolidated financial statements on pages 197 and 198. represented on Compass Group’s European Works Council
(EWC), which provides a forum for exchanging information and
SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDINGS engaging in consultation on the Group’s performance and plans,
The following major shareholdings have been notified to the and relevant transnational issues affecting those countries in
Company as at 30 September 2019 and up to the date of the EEA. Employees from across the Group’s EEA business have
this Report. been elected to employee representative roles on the EWC.
% of Compass
% of issued Group PLC’s Eligible employees in the UK are invited to join the Company’s
capital1 voting rights1 defined contribution pension arrangement, Compass Retirement
Blackrock, Inc. 9.99 9.99 Income Savings Plan (CRISP). CRISP has a corporate trustee
Invesco Limited 4.95 4.95 and the Chairman, Nigel Palmer, is a former employee of
Massachusetts Financial 9.96 9.96 the Group. The other six trustee directors are UK based
Services Company employees of the Group, three of whom have been nominated
by CRISP members.
1. Notified in accordance with DTR5.1.2. Since the notification date, the
shareholders’ interests in the Company may have changed. Those UK employees who transfer from the public sector under
TUPE have, typically up until 31 March 2015, been eligible to
The number of shares held by the directors as at
join the Compass Group Pension Plan (the Plan), a defined
30 September 2019 can be found on page 120 in the
benefit pension arrangement which has otherwise been closed
Directors’ Remuneration Report.
to new entrants since 2003. However, under the Government’s
EMPLOYEE SHARE TRUSTS revised guidance for ‘Fair Deal for staff pensions’, the
The Compass Group Employee Share Trust (ESOP) was expectation is and therefore the approach has been that the
established on 13 January 1992 in connection with the Group participate in the relevant public-sector pension scheme
Company’s share option plans. The Compass Group Long and close the Plan to future entrants. The Plan also has a
Term Incentive Plan Trust was established on 5 April 2001 corporate trustee. Philip Whittome is the independent Chairman.
in connection with the Company’s long term incentive plans, There are a further six trustee directors, five of whom are either
and in 2019, was adapted to allow it to source shares UK based employees or former employees of the Group (three of
for all of the Company’s share schemes and was renamed the whom have been nominated by Plan members), and the sixth is
Compass Group PLC All Shares Schemes Trust (ASST). an independent trustee director.
Details of employee equity incentive schemes are set out The Company is subject to the Pension Automatic Enrolment
in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 98 to 121. Regulations for its workforce in the UK. All new UK employees
As at 30 September 2019, the trustees of the ESOP and ASST who meet the statutory eligibility criteria, and who do not join
held nil (2018: nil) and 187,455 (2018: nil) ordinary shares of CRISP, are automatically enrolled into the National Employment
the Company respectively. Savings Trust (NEST). Responsibility for the Group’s ongoing
compliance with the pension automatic enrolment regulations
The Compass Group Executive Option Share Trust and and for ensuring that the administration and investment of funds
The Compass Group Executive Share Trust were established relating to automatic enrolment remain appropriate lies with the
on 15 and 22 February 2010 respectively in relation to the Group’s Pension Automatic Enrolment Governance Committee.
operation of equity incentive schemes in Australia. No ordinary
shares were held by these trusts as at 30 September 2019 Permanent employees outside the UK are usually offered
(2018: nil). membership of local pension arrangements if and where
they exist and where it is appropriate to have Company
AWARDS UNDER EMPLOYEE SHARE SCHEMES sponsored arrangements.
Details of awards made during the year and held by executive
directors as at 30 September 2019 are set out in the Directors’ Employees are offered a range of benefits, such as private
Remuneration Report on pages 98 to 121. medical cover, depending on the local environment. Priority is
given to the training of employees and the development of their
Details of employee equity incentive schemes and grants made skills. Employment of people with disabilities is considered on
during the year ended 30 September 2019, and extant awards merit with regard only to the ability of any applicant to carry out
held by employees are disclosed in the consolidated financial the role. Arrangements to enable people with disabilities to carry
statements on pages 197 to 199. out the duties required will be made if it is reasonable to do so.
An employee becoming disabled would, where appropriate,
EMPLOYEE POLICIES AND INVOLVEMENT be offered retraining.
The Group places particular importance on the involvement of
its employees, keeping them regularly informed through informal
bulletins and other in-house publications, meetings and the
Governance
NON-FINANCIAL REPORTING DIRECTIVE We seek to create a positive, open working environment
The EU Non-Financial Reporting Directive (the Directive) which wherever we operate. Our employee policies are set locally to
was implemented into English law as the Companies, comply with local law within an overall Group framework and we
Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Non-Financial monitor our employee satisfaction and engagement through a
Reporting) Regulations 2016 requires companies to disclose number of key performance indicators.
non-financial information necessary to provide investors and
other stakeholders with a better understanding of a company’s We also consider the concerns of wider communities where we
development, performance, position and impact of its activity. operate, including national and local interests, utilising our
The Audit Committee, which advises the Board on such matters, relevant expertise to help contribute to the wellbeing of
has concluded that the Company is compliant with the Directive communities which are appropriate to our business objectives.
and has included the necessary disclosures in this Report. Furthermore, the Group supports the rights of all people as set
out in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN
Throughout this Annual Report the directors have disclosed a Declaration) and considers carefully before doing any business
mix of financial and non-financial KPIs which they believe best in countries that do not adhere to the UN Declaration.
reflect the Group’s strategic priorities; and which will help to
convey an understanding of the culture of the business and the GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REPORTING
drivers which contribute to the ongoing success of the Company. The Company is required to state the annual quantity of
Please see the non-financial information statement on page 127 emissions in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from activities
which sets out where stakeholders can find information relating for which the Group is responsible, including the combustion
to non-financial matters. of fuel and the operation of any facility. Details of our emissions
during the year ended 30 September 2019 are set out within
EMPLOYEE DIVERSITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS the Corporate Responsibility section of the Strategic Report on
Our Code of Ethics was developed in consultation with the EWC page 60 and form part of the Directors’ Report disclosures and
and the Institute of Business Ethics and sets out clear standards are incorporated by reference. Further details of the actions
of behaviour that we expect all of our people to demonstrate and which the Group is taking to reduce emissions can also be found
adhere to. The Code of Ethics, which is part of our CBC, at www.compass-group.com. This Annual Report and Accounts
underpins our social, ethical and environmental commitments is certified carbon neutral by sponsoring a cause to offset
and sends a clear message to our stakeholders of our against the emissions arising from the production, printing and
commitment to responsible business practice. The 10 principles delivery of this Report. This year, the Company has participated
of the United Nations (UN) Global Compact, to which we are a in a project in Brazil which aims to prevent deforestation and
signatory, underpin our own Code of Ethics. This UN initiative protect one of the world’s most biodiverse habitats.
encourages companies to make human rights, labour standards,
environmental responsibility and anti-corruption part of their DONATIONS AND POLITICAL EXPENDITURE
business agenda. Our annual Communication on Progress can Charitable objectives support the Company’s CR strategy and
be viewed at www.unglobalcompact.org. have primarily focused on improving the environment,
education, health and wellbeing, community engagement and
Our people are instrumental in our success; we respect and responsible business practice. Donations have included
value the individuality and diversity that every employee brings employee involvement through fundraising and financial
to the Group. We base our relationship with our employees on support.
respect for the dignity of the individual and fair treatment for all.
In December, the Company will publish its fourth statement in Group charitable donations £m
accordance with the requirements of the Modern Slavery Act 2019 11.5
2015 and a copy of the statement will be available on the 2018 11.0
Company's website www.compass-group.com.
Since 2004, shareholders have passed an annual resolution, on
As at 30 September 2019, there were 596,452 (2018: 595,841) a precautionary basis, to approve donations to EU political
people employed by the Group (average number of employees organisations and to incur EU political expenditure (as such
including directors and part-time employees) of whom 351,860 terms were defined under the then relevant legislation) not
were female (2018: 337,962) and 244,592 were male exceeding a monetary limit approved by shareholders. The
(2018: 257,879). 620 were senior managers, 450 male, 170 Board has consistently confirmed that it operates a policy of not
female (2018: 537 male, 191 female), which includes members giving any cash contribution to any political party in the ordinary
of our global leadership team and statutory directors of meaning of those words and that it has no intention of changing
that policy.
Compass Group PLC Annual Report 2019 125
OTHER STATUTORY DISCLOSURES (CONTINUED)
No material amount of corporate funds or paid employee time chairmen of the Audit, Corporate Responsibility, Nomination
has been utilised during the year for political activities and, in and Remuneration Committees available to answer questions.
accordance with the Company’s CBC, employees must not The results of proxy voting for and against each resolution, as
engage in any form of lobbying or have contact with political well as abstentions, are announced to the London Stock
representatives, government employees or public interest Exchange and are published on the Company’s website as soon
groups unless they are doing so legitimately and adhering to as practicable after the meeting. Further shareholder
internal control processes. Further information regarding the information is available on pages 232 to 234.
CBC can be found on page 88 of this Annual Report and on the
Company’s website www.compass-group.com. CREST
The Company’s ordinary shares and sterling Eurobonds are in
The directors propose to renew the authority granted at the CREST, the settlement system for stocks and shares.
2019 AGM for the Group to make political donations and incur
political expenditure (as such terms are defined in sections 362 DISCLOSURES REQUIRED UNDER
to 365 of the CA 2006) until the Company’s next AGM, which UK LISTING RULE 9.8.4
they might otherwise be prohibited from making or incurring There are no disclosures required to be made under UK Listing
under the terms of the CA 2006 and which would not amount to Rule 9.8.4 which have not already been disclosed elsewhere in
‘donations’ in the ordinary sense of the word. It is proposed to this Report. Details of long term incentive plans can be found in
maintain the limit of such authority at £100,000. the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 98 to 121 and
details of dividends waived by shareholders can be found on
COMMUNICATING WITH SHAREHOLDERS page 122.
The Company places considerable importance on
communication with its shareholders, including its private SHAREHOLDER SERVICES
shareholders. The Group CEO and the Group CFO are closely Details of services provided to shareholders can be found in the
involved in investor relations and a senior executive has day to Shareholder Information section on pages 232 to 234 and on the
day responsibility for such matters. The views of the Company’s Company’s website.
major shareholders are reported to the Board by the Group CEO
AGM
and the Group CFO as well as by the Chairman (who remains
The Notice of Meeting setting out the resolutions to be proposed
in contact with our largest shareholders) and are discussed at
at the 2020 AGM, together with explanatory notes, is set out on
its meetings.
pages 235 to 245 of this Annual Report and is also available on
There is regular dialogue with institutional shareholders, and the Company’s website www.compass-group.com. The directors
private shareholders at the AGM. Contact with institutional consider that each of the resolutions is in the best interests of
shareholders (and with financial analysts, brokers and the the Company and the shareholders as a whole and recommend
media) is controlled by written guidelines in the Company’s that shareholders vote in favour of all of the resolutions.
Corporate Communications Code and Market Soundings Policy,
On behalf of the Board
in compliance with EU Market Abuse Regulation requirements
to ensure the continued protection of share price sensitive
information that has not already been made generally available
to the Company’s shareholders. Contact is also maintained,
when appropriate, with shareholders to discuss overall
Alison Yapp
remuneration plans and policies.
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
The primary method of communicating with shareholders
26 November 2019
is by electronic means, helping to make the Company more
environmentally friendly by reducing waste and pollution Compass Group PLC
associated with the production and posting of its Annual Report. Registered in England and Wales, No. 4083914
The Annual Report is available to all shareholders and can be
accessed via the Company’s website www.compass-group.com.
The Group’s annual and interim results are also published on the
Company’s website, together with all other announcements and
documents issued to the market, such as statements, interviews
and presentations by the Group CEO and Group CFO.
Governance
Statement GHG Emissions 60
Employees Code of Business Conduct Who we create value for – People 15
Workplace Health & SafetyChief Executive’s review – People 19
Policy Statement People Report – A renewed commitment 46–51
Principal Risks – Health and Safety, People 42
Safety culture 57
Human rights Code of Business Conduct Our Standards 88
Code of Ethics Slavery and Human Trafficking 91
Modern Slavery Act Employee diversity and Human rights 125
Transparency Statement
Human Rights Policy
Statement
Social matters Social Purpose Who we create value for – Purpose 15
Chief Executive’s review – Purpose 20
Corporate Responsibility 52–63
Anti-bribery and Code of Business Conduct Our values guide our actions and behaviours 51
corruption Code of Ethics Principal Risks – Compliance and Fraud 45
Group Speak Up Policy Our Standards 88
Sourcing Responsibly Supply Chain Integrity Standards 53
Business model Our Business Model 12
Non-financial KPIs Global Lost Time Incident Frequency Rate 3,27,57
Global Food Safety Incident Rate 3,27,57
Greenhouse gas intensity ratio 3,27,60
Women in global leadership team 50
Principal risks Identifying and Managing Risk 41–45
1. The Company’s policies, statements and codes are available on the Company’s website www.compass-group.com.
93%
2018
2019 (restated1)
Notes £m £m
Combined sales of Group and share of equity accounted joint ventures 2, 35 25,152 23,147
Less: share of sales of equity accounted joint ventures 13 (274) (275)
Revenue 24,878 22,872
Operating costs 3 (23,308) (21,229)
Operating profit before joint ventures and associates 1,570 1,643
Share of profit after tax of joint ventures and associates 2, 13 31 50
Operating profit 2 1,601 1,693
Underlying operating profit2 2, 35 1,882 1,744
Acquisition related costs 3 (54) (49)
One-off pension charge 22 (12) –
Cost action programme charge 3 (190) –
Share of profit of joint ventures and associates held for sale 13 (25) –
Tax on share of profit of joint ventures – (2)
Net loss on sale and closure of businesses 25 (7) (58)
Finance income 5 12 6
Finance costs 5 (122) (120)
Other financing items (loss)/gain 5 (15) 2
Profit before tax 6 1,469 1,523
Income tax expense 6 (351) (385)
Profit for the year 1,118 1,138
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
Equity shareholders of the Company 7 1,110 1,130
Non-controlling interests 8 8
Profit for the year 1,118 1,138
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE (PENCE) 7 70.0p 71.3p
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (PENCE) 7 69.9p 71.3p
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2. Underlying operating profit excludes acquisition related costs, one-off pension charge and cost action programme charge, but includes share of profit after
tax of associates and operating profit before tax of joint ventures, including those classified as held for sale. The reconciliation between statutory and
underlying results is provided in note 34.
2018
2019 (restated1)
Notes £m £m
Profit for the year 1,118 1,138
Other comprehensive income
Items that are not reclassified subsequently to the income statement
Remeasurement of post employment benefit obligations – (loss)/gain 22 (357) 68
Return on plan assets, excluding interest income – gain 22 425 21
Tax charge on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income 6 (10) (29)
58 60
Items that are or may be reclassified subsequently to the income statement
Currency translation differences 131 (76)
Reclassification adjustment for movements in foreign exchange on sale of businesses 6 –
Tax on items relating to the components of other comprehensive income 6 (2) (1)
135 (77)
Total other comprehensive gain/(loss) for the year 193 (17)
ATTRIBUTABLE TO
Equity shareholders of the Company 1,303 1,113
Non-controlling interests 8 8
Total comprehensive income for the year 1,311 1,121
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
1. The Group has adopted IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’ and IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’ effective for the year ended 30 September 2019.
IFRS 15 has been applied retrospectively and comparatives for the prior year have been restated, whilst IFRS 9 has been applied prospectively from
1 October 2018 by adjusting the opening balance sheet at that date. Additional information about the transitional impact of these standards is included in note 1.
Adjustment
for non-
controlling
Share-based interest put
payment Merger Revaluation Translation options Total other
reserve reserve reserve reserve reserve reserves
OTHER RESERVES Notes £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2018 232 4,170 7 (130) (71) 4,208
Other comprehensive income
Currency translation differences – – – 131 – 131
Reclassification adjustment for movements in
foreign exchange on sale of businesses – – – 6 – 6
Tax on items relating to the components of other
comprehensive income 6 – – – (2) – (2)
Total other comprehensive income – – – 135 – 135
Fair value of share-based payments 24 27 – – – – 27
Change in the fair value of non-controlling
interest put options – – – – (8) (8)
At 30 September 2019 259 4,170 7 5 (79) 4,362
Own shares held by the Group represent 187,455 ordinary shares in Compass Group PLC (2018: nil ordinary shares) and are held by the Compass Group All
Share Schemes Trust (ASST). These shares are listed on a recognised stock exchange and their market value at 30 September 2019 was £3.9 million (2018:
£nil). The nominal value held at 30 September 2019 was £20,714 (2018: £nil).
ASST is a discretionary trust for the benefit of employees and the shares held are used to satisfy some of the Group’s liabilities to employees for long term
incentive plans.
The merger reserve arose in 2000 following the demerger from Granada Compass plc.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
Adjustment
for non-
controlling
Share‑based interest put
payment Merger Revaluation Translation options Total other
reserve reserve reserve reserve reserve reserves
OTHER RESERVES Notes £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2017 211 4,170 7 (53) (15) 4,320
Other comprehensive income
Currency translation differences – – – (76) – (76)
Tax on items relating to the components of other
comprehensive income 6 – – – (1) – (1)
Total other comprehensive loss – – – (77) – (77)
Fair value of share-based payments 24 21 – – – – 21
Change in fair value of non-controlling
interest put options – – – – (56) (56)
At 30 September 2018 232 4,170 7 (130) (71) 4,208
30 September
2018 1 October 2017
2019 (restated1) (restated1)
Notes £m £m £m
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill 9 4,576 4,270 3,994
Other intangible assets 10 1,426 1,105 836
Contract fulfilment assets and contract costs 11 976 838 738
Property, plant and equipment 12 1,052 1,006 1,000
Interests in joint ventures and associates 13 226 263 220
Other investments 14 96 73 63
Post employment benefit assets 22 448 346 259
Trade and other receivables 15 96 105 104
Deferred tax assets 6 76 45 132
Derivative financial instruments2 19 207 83 139
Non-current assets 2 9,179 8,134 7,485
CURRENT ASSETS
Inventories 16 404 353 353
Trade and other receivables 15 3,051 2,852 2,696
Tax recoverable 88 69 86
Cash and cash equivalents2 17 398 969 387
Derivative financial instruments2 19 – 34 4
3,941 4,277 3,526
Assets held for sale 2, 25 190 236 –
Current assets 4,131 4,513 3,526
Total assets 2 13,310 12,647 11,011
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short term borrowings2 18 (186) (813) (20)
Derivative financial instruments2 19 (6) (12) (6)
Provisions 21 (223) (167) (132)
Current tax liabilities (247) (227) (227)
Trade and other payables 20 (4,718) (4,317) (3,892)
(5,380) (5,536) (4,277)
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale 2, 25 (30) (72) –
Current liabilities (5,410) (5,608) (4,277)
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Long term borrowings2 18 (3,679) (3,611) (3,939)
Derivative financial instruments2 19 (6) (33) (11)
Post employment benefit obligations 22 (259) (224) (231)
Provisions 21 (266) (227) (266)
Deferred tax liabilities 6 (114) (57) (58)
Trade and other payables 20 (214) (220) (87)
Non-current liabilities (4,538) (4,372) (4,592)
Total liabilities 2 (9,948) (9,980) (8,869)
Net assets 2 3,362 2,667 2,142
EQUITY
Share capital 23 176 176 176
Share premium account 182 182 182
Capital redemption reserve 295 295 295
Own shares (4) – –
Other reserves 4,362 4,208 4,320
Retained earnings (1,676) (2,219) (2,853)
Total equity shareholders' funds 3,335 2,642 2,120
Non-controlling interests 27 25 22
Total equity 3,362 2,667 2,142
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2. Component of net debt.
Approved by the Board of Directors on 26 November 2019 and signed on its behalf by
2018
2019 (restated1)
Notes £m £m
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Cash generated from operations 26 2,396 2,270
Interest paid (116) (101)
Tax received 26 26
Tax paid 6 (354) (349)
Net cash from operating activities 1,952 1,846
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of subsidiary companies2 25 (451) (420)
Purchase of additional interest in joint ventures and associates 13 (27) (32)
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary companies, joint ventures and associates net of exit costs2 101 39
Purchase of intangible assets (185) (164)
Purchase of contract fulfilment assets 11 (286) (261)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment 12 (352) (359)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment/intangible assets/contract fulfilment assets 47 54
Purchase of other investments 14 (13) (8)
Proceeds from sale of other investments 14 3 1
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. There is no
net cash impact as a result of the adoption of IFRS 15. Additional information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2. Net of cash acquired or disposed and payments received or made under warranties and indemnities.
3. Includes dividends received from joint ventures and associates classified as held for sale.
4. Including stamp duty and brokers’ commission.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. There is no
net cash impact as a result of the adoption of IFRS 15. Additional information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
At contract inception, the contract is assessed to identify each retail café concession, the performance obligation is satisfied
promise to transfer either a distinct good or service or a series of at a point in time, namely when the products are sold to
distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and the consumer.
have the same pattern of transfer to the customer. Goods and
services are distinct and accounted for as separate performance The nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash
obligations in the contract if the customer can benefit from them flows for performance obligations within a contract that are
either on their own or together with other resources that are satisfied over time and at a point in time are considered to be
readily available to the customer and they are separately similar and they are affected by the same economic factors.
identifiable in the contract. Performance obligations are usually
COSTS TO OBTAIN A CONTRACT
clearly identified within contracts and revenue is recognised for
Costs incurred during the bidding period, prior to a contract
each separate performance obligation. Generally, where the
being awarded, are expensed to the income statement. Costs
Group has the obligation to its clients to make available the
incurred in securing the contract after preferred bidder status
provision of food service for a predetermined period, its
has been obtained are generally expensed as incurred, unless
performance obligation represents a series of services delivered
they fulfil the conditions for capitalisation as an asset.
over time. There are also contracts under which the Group sells
products directly to consumers and these performance The incremental costs to obtain a contract with a customer,
obligations represent a transfer of a good at a point in time. such as commissions to the salesforce, are capitalised if it is
expected that those costs will be recoverable. Costs to obtain a
TRANSACTION PRICE
contract that would have been incurred regardless of whether
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which
the contract was obtained are recognised as an expense in the
the Group expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the
period. Only commissions directly attributable to an individual
promised goods and services to the customer, excluding value
contract award are capitalised, while commissions payable due
added tax and similar sales taxes. For example, the transaction
to multiple contract wins or due to a portfolio of client contracts
price may be based on a price per meal, which may vary with
are expensed as incurred as they cannot be directly attributable
volume, or could be based on costs incurred plus an agreed
to an identified contract.
management fee.
COSTS TO FULFIL A CONTRACT
The Group makes a variety of ongoing payments to clients,
Costs incurred in the fulfilment of the Group’s obligations to the
mainly commissions, concession rentals and reimbursement of
client under the contract are recognised in the consolidated
utility costs. These are assessed for treatment as consideration
balance sheet and include contributions towards service assets,
paid to customers and where they are not in exchange for a
such as kitchen and restaurant fit out costs and equipment,
distinct good or service they are recognised as a reduction of the
which are capitalised as contract fulfilment assets. Contract
transaction price. In addition, the Group may make a cash
fulfilment costs covered within the scope of another accounting
payment to a client typically at the start of a contract which is
standard, such as property, plant and equipment and intangible
not an investment in service assets and does not generate or
assets, are not capitalised as contract fulfilment assets but are
enhance the Group’s resources. Such payments are reported as
treated according to other standards.
prepayments and, as they are considered not to be in exchange
for a distinct good or service, they are charged to the income UTILISATION, DERECOGNITION AND IMPAIRMENT OF
statement as a deduction to revenue recognised over the CONTRACT FULFILMENT ASSETS AND CAPITALISED
contract term rather than as an operating cost. COSTS TO OBTAIN A CONTRACT
Contract fulfilment assets are amortised on a straight line basis
TIMING OF REVENUE RECOGNITION
over the shorter of the life of the client contract and the useful
Revenue is recognised as performance obligations are satisfied
economic life of the assets. The amortisation charge is included
as control of the goods and services is transferred to the
within operating costs. Costs incurred to obtain a contract are
customer. For each performance obligation within a contract,
unwound over the life of the client contract as an expense.
the Group determines whether it is satisfied over time or at a
point in time. Capitalised costs are derecognised either when disposed of or
when no further economic benefits are expected to flow from
The Group has determined that most of its performance
their use or disposal.
obligations are satisfied over time as the client simultaneously
receives and consumes the benefits provided by the Group as Whenever impairment indicators exist, the Group determines
the food service and/or support service are rendered at the client the recoverability of the contract fulfilment assets and
site. In these circumstances, revenue is recognised at the capitalised costs to obtain a contract by comparing their
amount which the Group has the right to invoice, where that carrying amount to the remaining amount of consideration that
amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Group expects to receive less the costs that relate to
the Group’s performance completed to date. Where the Group providing services under the relevant contract.
is contracted to sell directly to consumers, for example in a
On disposal, the attributable amount of goodwill is included in O ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
the determination of the gain or loss on disposal. Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for
sale if the carrying amount will be recovered through a sale
Goodwill arising on acquisitions before the date of transition to transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is
IFRS has been retained at the previous UK GAAP amounts regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable,
subject to being tested for impairment at that date. Goodwill management is committed to a sale plan, the asset is available
written off to reserves under UK GAAP prior to 1998 has not for immediate sale in its present condition and the sale is
been reinstated and is not included in determining any expected to be completed within one year from the date of
subsequent gain or loss on disposal. classification. Goodwill is allocated to the held for sale business
on a relative fair value basis where this business forms part of a
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
larger CGU. Investments in joint ventures and associates that
Intangible assets acquired separately are capitalised at cost or,
have been classified as held for sale are no longer accounted for
if acquired as part of a business combination, are capitalised at
using the equity method. These assets are measured at the
fair value as at the date of the acquisition. Group investment in
lower of carrying value and fair value less costs to sell.
rights to generate significant consumer revenue under client
contracts is recognised at cost as other intangible assets. P INVENTORIES
Amortisation is charged on a straight line basis over the Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable
expected useful lives of the assets. Internally generated value. Cost is calculated using either the weighted average price
intangible assets are not capitalised. Intangible assets are or the first in, first out method as appropriate to the
reviewed for impairment annually. circumstances. Net realisable value is the estimated selling
price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable
The following rates applied for the Group:
selling expenses.
• client contract related intangible assets: the life
Q FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
of the contract
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the
• computer software: 20% to 33% per annum Group’s balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the
contractual provisions of the instrument. Financial assets and
The typical life of contract related intangibles is 2 to 20 years.
liabilities, including derivative financial instruments,
Client contracts related intangible assets arising on acquisition denominated in foreign currencies are translated into sterling at
of a business are recognised at fair value and amortised over period end exchange rates. Financial assets are classified as
the life of the contract, including the renewal period where either fair value through profit and loss, fair value through other
appropriate. Underlying operating profit and underlying comprehensive income, or amortised cost. Classification and
earnings per share exclude the amortisation of contract related subsequent remeasurement depends on the Group’s business
intangible assets arising on acquisition of a business as it is not model for managing the financial asset and its cash flow
considered to be relevant to the underlying trading performance characteristics. Assets that are held for collection of contractual
of the Group. cash flows, where those cash flows represent solely payments of
principal and interest, are measured at amortised cost.
N PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
All tangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment when there INVESTMENTS
are indications that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Other investments comprising debt and equity instruments are
Freehold land is not depreciated. All other property, plant and recognised at fair value plus direct transaction costs.
equipment assets are carried at cost less accumulated
Debt instruments are classified at fair value through other
depreciation and any recognised impairment in value.
comprehensive income. Gains and losses arising from changes
Depreciation is provided on a straight line basis over the in fair value are recognised directly in other comprehensive
anticipated useful lives of the assets. income, except for impairment gains or losses, interest income
and foreign exchange gains and losses, which are recognised in
The following rates applied for the Group: the income statement. When the debt instrument is
derecognised, cumulative amounts in other comprehensive
• freehold buildings and long term leasehold property: income are reclassified to the income statement.
2% per annum
• short term leasehold property: the life of the lease Equity investments have been irrevocably designated at fair
• plant and machinery: 8% to 33% per annum value through other comprehensive income. Gains and losses
• fixtures and fittings: 8% to 33% per annum arising from changes in fair value are recognised directly in
other comprehensive income, and are not subsequently
When assets are sold, the difference between sales proceeds reclassified to the Group income statement, including
and the carrying amount of the assets is dealt with in the on derecognition.
consolidated income statement.
Hedge accounting is discontinued when the hedging instrument For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to
expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no longer qualifies separately administered pension plans. The Group has no
for hedge accounting. At that point in time, any cumulative gain further payment obligations once the contributions have been
or loss on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is kept in paid. The contributions payable by the Group in respect of
equity until the forecasted transaction occurs. If a hedged defined contribution plans are charged to the consolidated
transaction is no longer expected to occur, the net cumulative income statement when they are due. Payments made to state
gain or loss recognised in equity is transferred to the managed schemes are treated as payments to defined
consolidated income statement in the period. contribution schemes where the Group’s obligations under the
schemes are equivalent to those arising in a defined contribution
R LEASES pension scheme.
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of
the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of For defined benefit plans, the calculation of the defined benefit
ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as obligation is performed at least once a year by a qualified
operating leases. actuary using the projected unit credit method. The
consolidated balance sheet reflects a net asset or net liability for
Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets of the each defined benefit pension plan. The liability recognised is the
Group at their fair value or, if lower, at the present value of the present value of the defined benefit obligation discounted using
minimum lease payments, each determined at the inception of the yields on high quality corporate bonds less the fair value of
the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in plan assets (at bid price), if any. If the fair value of the plan
the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments assets exceeds the defined benefit obligation, a pension surplus
are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the is only recognised if the Group considers that it has an
lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on unconditional right to a refund.
the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are
charged directly to the consolidated income statement. For the UK defined benefit plan, the Group considers that it has
an unconditional right to a refund of a surplus, assuming the
Payments made under operating leases are charged to income gradual settlement of the plan liabilities over time until all
on a straight line basis over the period of the lease. Any members have left the plan. The trustees cannot unconditionally
incentives to enter into an operating lease are also spread on a wind up the plan or use the surplus to enhance member benefits
straight line basis over the lease term. without employer consent. The Group’s judgement is that these
trustee rights do not prevent the Group from recognising an
S PROVISIONS
unconditional right to a refund and therefore a surplus.
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present
obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that the Net interest income (if a plan is in surplus) or interest expense (if
Group will be required to settle that obligation. Provisions are a plan is in deficit) is calculated using yields on high quality
measured at the directors’ best estimate of the cost of settling corporate bonds and recognised in the consolidated income
these liabilities and are discounted to present value where the statement. A current service cost is also recognised which
effect is material. represents the expected present value of the defined benefit
pension entitlement earned by members in the period.
T EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
PENSION OBLIGATIONS Remeasurements, which include gains and losses as a result of
The Group operates two types of pension plans: changes in actuarial assumptions, the effect of the limit on the
plan surplus (if any) and returns on plan assets (other than
• Defined contribution plans where the Group makes
amounts included in net interest) are recognised in the
contributions to a member’s pension plan but has no further
consolidated statement of comprehensive income in the period
payment obligations once the contributions have been paid
in which they occur. Remeasurements are not reclassified to
• Defined benefit plans which provide pension payments upon profit or loss in subsequent periods.
retirement to members as defined by the plan rules
SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to
certain employees. In accordance with the requirements of
IFRS 2 ‘Share-based payments’, the Group has applied IFRS 2 to
all equity-settled share options granted after 7 November 2002
that had vested before 1 January 2005.
HOLIDAY PAY
Paid holidays and similar entitlements are regarded as an
employee benefit and are charged to the consolidated income
statement as the benefits are earned. An accrual is made at the
balance sheet date to reflect the fair value of holidays earned
but not taken.
This change results in a reduction to revenue and no change to operating profit. The consolidated income statement for the year
ended 30 September 2018 was restated to recognise a reduction in revenue of £71 million. This amount was previously reported as
operating costs.
From a balance sheet perspective, this change has resulted in an adjustment of £32 million at the opening balance sheet date as at
1 October 2017 to recognise the net book value of the costs to obtain a contract. The opening balance sheet as at 1 October 2017
has also been adjusted to recognise the associated deferred tax impact of £10 million. The consolidated balance sheet as at
30 September 2018 was also restated to recognise the additional net book value of the costs to obtain a contract of £3 million.
The consolidated income statement for the year ended 30 September 2018 was restated to recognise a net decrease in operating
costs of £3 million due to the de-recognition of commissions paid to the salesforce now capitalised net of the charge recorded for the
year in relation to these assets (£16 million and £13 million respectively for the year ended 30 September 2018).
The consolidated income statement for the year ended 30 September 2018 was also restated to recognise a reduction in the
deferred tax liability of £2 million, giving a rise to an income statement deferred tax credit of the same amount.
As a result, a balance sheet reclassification from intangible assets to contract fulfilment assets of £706 million was made at the
opening balance sheet date as at 1 October 2017. The consolidated balance sheet as at 30 September 2018 was also restated to
recognise the additional reclassification to contract fulfilment assets in the period of £97 million, which includes an increase in the
net book value of contract fulfilment assets of £76 million net of the impact of a foreign currency translation gain of £21 million.
Under IFRS 15, these payments are assessed for treatment as ‘consideration payable to a customer’ and where they are not in
exchange for a distinct good or service, they continue to be recorded as a contract prepayment, however they are charged to the
consolidated income statement as a deduction to revenue recognised over the contract term rather than an operating cost. As a
result, the consolidated income statement for the year ended 30 September 2018 was restated to recognise a reduction in revenue
of £21 million.
In the consolidated cash flow statement, these client prepayments are reclassified from investing activities to cash flow
from operations.
The Group is a food service and support services provider and generates revenue by providing these services. Revenue is recognised
when the service is performed or when the goods (i.e. food, drinks or meals) are sold. Revenue recognised often corresponds to the
amount invoiced or to be invoiced for services delivered in the year, with the associated cost of delivery recognised as incurred.
There are no significant judgements associated with this approach.
The Group disaggregates revenue recognised from contracts with customers into categories that depict how the nature, amount,
As a result, the carrying values of trade receivables and contract assets are now reduced by the estimated future credit losses at the
date of initial recognition and going forward where previously credit losses were not recognised on such assets until there was an
indicator of impairment, such as a payment default. The application of IFRS 9 at 1 October 2018 results in a £15 million adjustment
to retained earnings reflective of an additional provision for impairment of trade receivables of £19 million net of a deferred tax asset
of £4 million.
Hedging
The Group elected to continue to apply the hedge accounting guidance in IAS 39.
On the date of initial application, 1 October 2018, the Group assessed which business models apply to the financial assets and
financial liabilities held by the Group and has classified its financial instruments into the appropriate IFRS 9 categories.
1. Where a financial instrument is the hedged item in a fair value hedge, the amortised cost is adjusted due to changes in the hedged risk with the change being
recorded in the consolidated income statement.
1. Includes share of profit of joint ventures and associates classified as held for sale.
2. Underlying operating profit is the profit measure considered by the chief operating decision maker.
3. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
From 1 October 2019 the Group’s geographical segments of Europe and Rest of World will be reclassified to reflect a change in the
way those segments are managed by the chief operating decision maker: Turkey will form part of the Europe segment. Revenue of
£306 million and regional underlying profit of £21 million will be reclassified from Rest of World to Europe for the year ended
30 September 2019.
1. Non-current assets located in the UK, the Group’s country of domicile, were £1,767 million (2018: £1,793 million). Non-current assets located in the USA
were £4,889 million (2018: £4,095 million). Non-current assets located in all foreign countries in which the Group holds assets were £7,412 million (2018:
£6,341 million).
2. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
The Group’s consolidated income statement includes a cost action programme charge of £190 million, of which £29 million has
been paid in the year to 30 September 2019.
Included within the total cost action programme charge is a non‑cash charge of £120 million in respect of losses on onerous
contracts and impairment of non-current assets. Provisions are described further in note 21.
The onerous contract provisions are estimated at the lower of any termination penalties or directly attributable unavoidable
losses (including minimum lease payments) over the remaining non-cancellable contract term after impairment of any contract
related assets.
The programme will continue into 2020 with a further expected cost of approximately £110 million.
2019 2018
AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES £m £m
AUDIT SERVICES
Fees payable for the audit of the Company and consolidated financial statements 0.9 0.9
Fees payable for the audit of the Company’s subsidiaries and joint ventures 5.2 5.4
Total audit fees 6.1 6.3
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Audit related assurance 0.4 0.6
Other tax advisory – 0.1
Total non-audit fees 0.4 0.7
TOTAL AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES
Total audit and non-audit services 6.5 7.0
4 EMPLOYEES
AVERAGE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING DIRECTORS AND PART-TIME EMPLOYEES 2019 2018
North America 288,133 269,752
Europe 157,879 149,382
Rest of World 150,440 176,707
Total 596,452 595,841
2019 20181
AGGREGATE REMUNERATION OF ALL EMPLOYEES INCLUDING DIRECTORS £m £m
Wages and salaries 9,637 8,970
Social security costs 1,547 1,431
Share-based payments 27 21
Pension costs – defined contribution plans 126 110
Pension costs – defined benefit plans 33 24
Total 11,370 10,556
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
In addition to the pension cost shown in operating costs above, there is a pensions-related net credit to finance income of £3 million
(2018: £nil).
The remuneration of directors and key management personnel1 is set out below. Additional information on directors’ and key
management remuneration, long term incentive plans, pension contributions and entitlements can be found in the audited section
of the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 98 to 121 and forms part of these accounts.
2019 2018
REMUNERATION OF KEY PERSONNEL1 £m £m
Salaries 7.3 6.7
Other short term employee remuneration 6.3 7.6
Share-based payments 4.6 3.5
Pension salary supplement 1.3 1.3
Total 19.5 19.1
1. Key management personnel is defined as the Board of Directors and the individuals who made up the Executive Committee from time to time during the year,
more details of which can be found on pages 70 and 71 and pages 24 and 25.
2019 2018
FINANCE INCOME AND COSTS £m £m
FINANCE INCOME
Bank interest 7 6
Interest on net post employment benefit obligations (note 22) 3 –
Other finance income 2 –
Total finance income 12 6
FINANCE COSTS
Interest on bank loans and overdrafts 13 13
Interest on other loans 101 100
Finance lease interest – 1
Interest on bank loans, overdrafts, other loans and finance leases 114 114
Unwinding of discount on provisions 8 6
2019 2018
FINANCING RELATED LOSSES/(GAINS) £m £m
HEDGE ACCOUNTING INEFFECTIVENESS
Unrealised net losses/(gains) on unhedged derivative financial instruments1 19 (4)
Unrealised net (gains)/losses on derivative financial instruments in a designated fair value hedge2 (163) 50
Unrealised net losses/(gains) on the hedged item in a designated fair value hedge 163 (44)
Total hedge accounting ineffectiveness 19 2
CHANGE IN THE FAIR VALUE OF INVESTMENTS
Gain from the changes in the fair value of investments1,3 (4) (4)
Total financing related losses/(gains) 15 (2)
1. Categorised as ‘fair value through profit or loss’ (IFRS 9).
2. Categorised as derivatives that are designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value (IFRS 9).
3. Life insurance policies used by overseas companies to meet the cost of unfunded post employment benefit obligations included in note 22.
6 TAX
2018
RECOGNISED IN THE CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT: 2019 (restated1)
INCOME TAX EXPENSE £m £m
CURRENT TAX
Current year 387 380
Adjustment in respect of prior years (29) (11)
Current tax expense 358 369
DEFERRED TAX
Current year (8) 17
Impact of changes in statutory tax rates (1) (6)
Adjustment in respect of prior years 2 5
Deferred tax expense (7) 16
TOTAL INCOME TAX
Income tax expense 351 385
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
The income tax expense for the year is based on the effective United Kingdom statutory rate of corporation tax for the period of
19.0% (2018: 19.0%). Overseas tax is calculated at the rates prevailing in the respective jurisdictions.
The income tax effects of the adjustments between statutory and underlying results are shown in note 34 to the consolidated
financial statements. There is no difference between the statutory and underlying cash tax paid of £354 million (2018: statutory and
underlying £349 million).
2018
2019 (restated1)
RECONCILIATION OF EFFECTIVE TAX RATE £m £m
Profit before tax 1,469 1,523
Notional income tax expense at the effective UK statutory rate of 19.0% (2018: 19.0%)
on profit before tax 279 289
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in other jurisdictions 112 128
Impact of changes in statutory tax rates (1) (6)
Permanent differences (18) (22)
Impact of share-based payments – 3
Tax on profit of associates and equity accounted joint ventures – (2)
Unrelieved current year tax losses 6 1
Prior year items (27) (6)
Income tax expense 351 385
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
Permanent differences include the internal financing that is in place to ensure the Group’s overseas businesses are appropriately
capitalised. These intra-group arrangements provide a benefit to the Group’s effective tax rate. Prior year items relate to the
reassessment of prior year tax estimates, the application of the statute of limitations and the resolution of open items.
The global nature of the Group’s operations gives rise to several factors which could affect the future tax rate. These include the mix
of profits, changes to statutory tax rates or tax legislation and the foreign exchange rates applicable when those profits are translated
into sterling. In addition, the future tax charge may be affected by the impact of acquisitions, disposals or other restructurings and
the resolution of open issues with tax authorities.
Tax uncertainties and associated risks are increasing for all multi national groups as a consequence of changes to local and
international tax rules. Tax risk can arise from unclear regulations and differences in interpretation, but most significantly where tax
authorities apply diverging standards in assessing intra-group cross-border transactions. The Group has recognised potential
liabilities in respect of uncertain tax positions as described in section B of the Group accounting policies, none of which is individually
material. In determining such liabilities, having regard to the specific circumstances of each tax position and external advice where
appropriate, the Group assesses the range of potential outcomes and estimates whether additional tax may be due. The Group does
not currently anticipate any material changes to the amounts recorded at 30 September 2019 (see also note 28).
Net
Intangibles pensions Net Net
and contract and post self-funded short term
Tax fulfilment employment Tax insurance temporary
MOVEMENT IN NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET/ depreciation assets benefits losses provisions differences Total
(LIABILITY) £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Net short term temporary differences relate principally to accruals and other liabilities and provisions of overseas subsidiaries.
After netting off balances within countries, the following are the deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised in the consolidated
balance sheet:
2018
2019 (restated1)
NET DEFERRED TAX BALANCE £m £m
Deferred tax assets 76 45
Deferred tax liabilities (114) (57)
Net deferred tax liability (38) (12)
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
Deferred tax assets have not been recognised in respect of tax losses of £232 million (2018: £41 million) and other temporary
differences of £24 million (2018: £20 million). Of the total tax losses, £212 million (2018: £26 million) will expire at various dates
between 2020 and 2025. These deferred tax assets have not been recognised as the timing of recovery is uncertain.
The Group does not recognise any deferred tax liability on temporary differences relating to potentially taxable unremitted earnings
of overseas subsidiaries totalling £474 million (2018: £474 million) because it is able to control the timing of reversal of these
differences. It is probable that no reversal will take place in the foreseeable future.
2019 2018
Ordinary Ordinary
shares of shares of
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES (MILLIONS OF ORDINARY SHARES) 111/20p each 111/20p each
Average number of shares for basic earnings per share 1,586 1,584
Dilutive share options 1 1
Average number of shares for diluted earnings per share 1,587 1,585
2019 2018
Dividends Dividends
per share per share
DIVIDENDS ON ORDINARY SHARES pence £m pence £m
Amounts recognised as distributions to equity shareholders during
the year:
Final 2017 – – 22.3 353
Interim 2018 – – 12.3 195
Final 2018 25.4 403 – –
Interim 2019 13.1 208 – –
Total dividends 38.5 611 34.6 548
9 GOODWILL
During the year the Group made a number of acquisitions. See note 25 for more details.
GOODWILL £m
COST
At 1 October 2017 4,510
Additions 312
Disposals (2)
Reclassification to assets held for sale (38)
Currency adjustment 4
At 30 September 2018 4,786
Additions 198
Disposals (13)
Reclassification to assets held for sale (25)
Currency adjustment 146
At 30 September 2019 5,092
IMPAIRMENT
At 30 September 2018 516
At 30 September 2019 516
NET CARRYING VALUE
At 30 September 2018 4,270
At 30 September 2019 4,576
9 GOODWILL (CONTINUED)
2019 2018
GOODWILL BY BUSINESS SEGMENT £m £m
USA 2,160 1,893
Canada 189 175
Total North America 2,349 2,068
UK 1,446 1,430
Rest of Europe 401 390
Total Europe 1,847 1,820
Japan 142 153
Rest of Rest of World 238 229
Total Rest of World 380 382
Total 4,576 4,270
The Group tests goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired. The
recoverable amount of a cash‑generating unit (CGU) is determined from value in use calculations. The key assumptions for these
calculations are externally derived long term growth rates, pre-tax discount rates and cash flow forecasts derived from the most
recent financial budgets and forecasts approved by management covering a five year period. Budgets and forecasts are based on
expectations of future outcomes taking into account past experience, adjusted for anticipated revenue growth, from both new
business and like for like growth and taking into consideration external economic factors. Cash flows beyond the five year period are
extrapolated using estimated growth rates based on local expected economic conditions and do not exceed the long term average
growth rate for that country. The pre-tax discount rates are based on the Group’s weighted average cost of capital adjusted for
specific risks relating to the country in which the CGU operates.
2019 2018
GROWTH AND DISCOUNT RATES Residual growth rates Pre-tax discount rates Residual growth rates Pre-tax discount rates
USA 1.9% 6.8% 2.0% 8.6%
Canada 2.1% 7.3% 1.9% 8.5%
UK 2.0% 6.7% 2.1% 8.0%
Rest of Europe 1.1 – 4.3% 6.1 – 11.8% 1.2 – 4.0% 7.5 – 13.7%
Japan 1.2% 7.2% 1.3% 8.7%
Rest of World 0.9 – 9.6% 5.6 – 19.8% 1.1 – 9.9% 7.0 – 18.5%
A sensitivity analysis has been performed in assessing recoverable amounts of goodwill for all CGUs. This has been based on
changes in key assumptions considered to be reasonably possible by management. The directors do not consider that any
reasonably possible changes in the key assumptions would cause the value in use of the net operating assets of the individually
significant CGUs disclosed above to fall below their carrying values.
As a result of the instability caused by the UK’s decision to exit the European Union (Brexit), there is a wide range of potential
outcomes regarding the possible future performance of the UK business. At this stage we consider that no reasonable change to any
of the key assumptions underpinning the UK’s impairment test would cause its carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount.
1. The intangible assets arising on acquisition are mainly client contract related.
2. Client contract related intangible assets, other than those arising on acquisition, arise from payments made to clients to obtain the right to generate
significant consumer revenue.
3. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 'Revenue from contracts with customers'. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
The Group’s deferred income and accrued income balances solely relate to revenue from contracts with customers. Movements
during the year were driven by transactions entered into by the Group within the normal course of business in the year.
Contract fulfilment assets relate to contributions towards assets that the Group uses in the performance of its obligations in its
contracts with clients.
2018
2019 (restated1)
CONTRACT FULFILMENT ASSETS £m £m
At 1 October 803 706
Additions 286 261
Derecognition (18) (14)
Business acquisitions – 4
Charge for the year (184) (164)
Reclassified (2) (11)
Reclassification to assets held for sale 1 –
Currency adjustment 48 21
At 30 September 934 803
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
IMPAIRMENT
Contract fulfilment assets and capitalised costs to obtain contracts are reviewed annually to identify indicators of impairment. When
such indicators exist, the Group determines the recoverability by comparing their carrying amount to the remaining consideration
that the Group expects to receive less the costs associated to providing services under the relevant contract. Management is
required to make an assessment of the costs that relate to providing services under the relevant contract. The ability to accurately
forecast such costs involves estimates around cost savings to be achieved over time and anticipated profitability of the contract.
If any indicators of impairment are identified, judgement is applied to ascertain whether or not the future economic benefits from
these contracts are sufficient to recover these assets. The directors believe that there is no impairment required.
The net book value of the Group's property, plant and equipment includes assets held under finance leases as follows:
Land and Plant and Fixtures and
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT buildings machinery fittings Total
HELD UNDER FINANCE LEASES £m £m £m £m
At 30 September 2018 1 5 1 7
At 30 September 2019 3 9 1 13
None of these investments are held directly by the ultimate Parent Company. All joint ventures provide food and/or support services
in their respective countries of incorporation and make their accounts up to 30 September. All holdings are in the ordinary shares of
the respective joint venture company.
These investments are structured through separate vehicles and the Group has a residual interest in their respective net assets.
Accordingly, the Group has classified its interests as joint ventures which are equity accounted. The tables below reconcile the
summarised financial information to the carrying amount of the Group's interests in its associates and joint ventures.
2019 2018
INTERESTS IN JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES £m £m
NET BOOK VALUE
At 1 October 263 220
Additions 27 32
Sale and closure of businesses (1) (4)
Share of profits less losses (net of tax)1 31 50
Dividends received2 (48) (35)
Transfer to disposal group classified as held for sale (55) (1)
Currency and other adjustments 9 1
At 30 September 226 263
COMPRISED OF
Interests in associates 209 179
Interests in joint ventures 17 84
Total 226 263
1. Excludes £25 million share of profit of joint ventures and associates classified as held for sale during the year.
2. Includes dividends received of £25 million of joint ventures and associates classified as held for sale during the year.
1. Excludes revenue of £154 million and £129 million expenses, including the relevant portion of income tax, of joint ventures classified as held for sale during
the year.
2. Expenses include the relevant portion of income tax recorded by associates and joint ventures.
14 OTHER INVESTMENTS
2019 2018
OTHER INVESTMENTS £m £m
NET BOOK VALUE
At 1 October 73 63
Additions 13 8
Disposals (3) (1)
Changes in fair value 8 –
Currency and other adjustments 5 3
At 30 September 96 73
COMPRISED OF1, 2
Other investments3 22 17
Life insurance policies and mutual fund investments4, 5 74 56
Total 96 73
1. IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’ was applied for the first time on 1 October 2018 and introduces new classifications for financial instruments, including
investments. Under IAS 39 ‘Financial instruments: recognition and measurement’, other investments were classified as available for sale. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 9 is included in note 1.
2. As per the fair value hierarchies defined by IFRS 13 ‘Fair value measurement’, other investments are Level 1 and the life insurance policies are Level 2.
3. Categorised as ‘fair value through other comprehensive income’ financial assets (IFRS 9).
4. Categorised as ‘fair value through profit or loss’ and ‘fair value through other comprehensive income’ financial assets respectively (IFRS 9).
5. Life insurance policies used by overseas companies to meet the cost of unfunded post employment benefit obligations as set out in note 22.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2. Categorised as ‘amortised cost’ financial assets (IFRS 9).
3. Includes net contract prepayments balance of £84 million (2018: £68 million).
TRADE RECEIVABLES
The book value of trade and other receivables approximates to their fair value due to the short term nature of the majority of
the receivables.
Credit sales are only made after credit approval procedures have been completed satisfactorily. The policy for making provisions for
bad and doubtful debts varies from country to country as different countries and markets have different payment practices, but
various factors are considered, including how overdue the debt is, the type of receivable and its past history, and current market and
trading conditions. Full provision is made for debts that are not considered to be recoverable.
There is limited concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables due to the diverse and unrelated nature of the Group’s
client base. Expected credit losses are measured using historical cash collection data grouped according to payment terms. The
historical default rates are adjusted where macroeconomic factors are expected to have a significant impact when determining
future expected credit loss rates. The expected credit loss provision is calculated using a provision matrix, in which the provision
increases as balances age.
Trade receivables and contract assets are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery and enforcement activity
has ceased. An impairment analysis is performed at each reporting date to measure expected credit losses. Accordingly, the
directors believe that there is no further credit provision required in excess of the provision for the impairment of receivables. The
book value of trade and other receivables represents the Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk.
Trade receivable days at 30 September 2019 were 39 days (2018: 41 days) on a constant currency basis.
2018
Over 12
0-3 months 3-6 months 6-12 months months
Not yet due overdue overdue overdue overdue Total
TRADE RECEIVABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
Gross trade receivables 1,615 414 51 24 37 2,141
Movements in the provision for impairment of trade and other receivables are as follows:
2019 2018
PROVISION FOR IMPAIRMENT OF TRADE Trade Other Total Trade Other Total
AND OTHER RECEIVABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 63 30 93 73 26 99
Implementation of IFRS 91 18 1 19 – – –
At 1 October, as adjusted1 81 31 112 73 26 99
Charged to income statement 23 10 33 22 5 27
Credited to income statement (16) (4) (20) (13) – (13)
Utilised (16) (3) (19) (16) – (16)
Reclassification to assets held for sale (1) – (1) (1) – (1)
Reclassified – 9 9 1 4 5
Currency adjustment 2 3 5 (3) (5) (8)
At 30 September 73 46 119 63 30 93
1. Adjusted as a result of the Group’s adoption of IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments’. Additional information about the impact of IFRS 9 is included in note 1.
At 30 September 2019, trade receivables of £524 million (2018: £463 million) were past due but not impaired. The Group has made
a provision based on a number of factors, including past history of the debtor and the expected credit loss, and all amounts not
provided for are considered to be recoverable.
16 INVENTORIES
2019 2018
INVENTORIES £m £m
NET BOOK VALUE
At 1 October 353 353
Business acquisitions 11 7
Net movement 26 (7)
Currency adjustment 14 –
At 30 September 404 353
2019 2018
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BY CURRENCY £m £m
Sterling 99 658
US Dollar 92 105
Euro 38 47
Japanese Yen 9 5
Other 160 154
Cash and cash equivalents 398 969
The Group’s policy to manage the credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents is set out in note 19. The book value of cash
and cash equivalents represents the maximum credit exposure.
2018
Gross Offset Net
£m £m £m
Cash and cash equivalents 989 (20) 969
Bank overdrafts (96) 20 (76)
Interest on bank overdrafts and commercial paper is at the relevant money market rates. During the year, the Group established a
$2 billion commercial paper programme. Commercial paper is issued to meet short term liquidity requirements and is supported by
£2 billion of syndicated committed bank facilities which mature in August 2024. As at 30 September 2019, no commercial paper
was outstanding under the programme and no amounts were drawn under the syndicated committed bank facility.
All amounts due under bonds, loan notes and bank facilities are shown net of unamortised issue costs. Additionally, the Group
adjusts the carrying values of the bonds and loan notes that are designated in effective fair value hedge relationships, for fair value
gains and losses (based on observable market inputs) attributable to the risk being hedged.
2019 2018
Carrying Carrying
Nominal value value
BONDS value Redeemable Interest £m £m
1. Interest rates are referenced to market specific benchmark rates for each currency equivalent plus a margin.
2019 2018
Present Present
Gross value Gross value
GROSS AND PRESENT VALUE OF FINANCE LEASE LIABILITIES £m £m £m £m
Finance lease payments falling due:
Within 1 year 2 2 3 3
In 1 to 5 years 1 1 3 3
3 3 6 6
Less: Future finance charges – – – –
Gross and present value of finance lease liabilities 3 3 6 6
2019 2018
Finance Finance
Borrowings leases Total Borrowings leases Total
BORROWINGS BY CURRENCY £m £m £m £m £m £m
Sterling 814 – 814 838 – 838
US Dollar 1,373 – 1,373 1,454 1 1,455
Euro 1,649 1 1,650 2,111 2 2,113
Other 26 2 28 15 3 18
Total 3,862 3 3,865 4,418 6 4,424
The Group had the following undrawn committed facilities available at 30 September, in respect of which all conditions precedent
had then been met:
2019 2018
UNDRAWN COMMITTED FACILITIES £m £m
Expiring between 1 and 5 years 2,000 1,690
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
The Group manages its interest rate and foreign currency exposure in accordance with the policies set out below. The Group’s
financial instruments comprise cash, borrowings, receivables and payables that are used to finance the Group’s operations. The
Group also uses derivatives, principally interest rate swaps, forward currency contracts and cross currency swaps, to manage
interest rate and currency risks arising from the Group’s operations. The Group does not trade in financial instruments. The Group’s
treasury policies are designed to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates and to manage the Group’s
financial risks. The Board approves any changes to the policies.
LIQUIDITY RISK
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group may not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due.
The borrowings in each currency can give rise to foreign exchange differences on translation into sterling. Where the borrowings are
less than, or equate to, the net investment in overseas operations, these exchange rate variances are treated as movements on
reserves and recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income rather than in the consolidated income statement.
Non-sterling earnings streams are translated at the average rate of exchange for the year. Fluctuations in exchange rates have given
and will continue to give rise to translation differences. The Group is only partially protected from the impact of such differences
through the matching of cash flows to currency borrowings.
The Group has minimal exposure to the foreign currency risk of trade receivables and payables as operations within individual
countries have little cross-border activity which might give rise to translation risks on trade related balances.
The main currencies to which the Group’s reported sterling financial position is exposed are the US dollar and the euro. As set out
above, the Group seeks to hedge its exposure to currencies by matching debt in currency against the cash flows generated by the
Group’s foreign operations in such currencies.
The effect on profit after tax and equity of a 10% strengthening of sterling against these currencies on the Group’s financial
instruments is shown below. A 10% weakening would result in an equal and opposite impact on the profit or loss and equity of the
Group. This table shows the impact on the financial instruments in place at 30 September and has been prepared on the basis that
the 10% change in exchange rates occurred on the first day of the financial year and applied consistently throughout the year.
2019 2018
Against Against Against Against
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS: US Dollar Euro US Dollar Euro
IMPACT OF STERLING STRENGTHENING BY 10% £m £m £m £m
(Decrease)/increase in profit for the year (after tax) (17) (10) 4 5
Increase in total equity 114 37 168 92
The sensitivity analysis given below has been determined based on the derivative and non-derivative financial instruments the Group
had in place at the year end date only.
The effect of a 1% increase in interest rates prevailing at the balance sheet date on the Group’s cash and cash equivalents and debt
subject to variable rates of interest at the balance sheet date would be £nil (2018: loss of £6 million) over the course of a year. A
similar 1% decrease in interest rates would result in an equal and opposite effect over the course of a year.
2019
Sterling US Dollar Euro Other Total
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS £m £m £m £m £m
Increase in interest rate +1% +1% +1% +1% n/a
Floating rate exposure – (debt)/cash (286) (49) 138 180 (17)
(Decrease)/increase in profit for the year (after tax) (2) – 1 1 –
2018
Sterling US Dollar Euro Other Total
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS £m £m £m £m £m
Increase in interest rate +1% +1% +1% +1% n/a
Floating rate exposure – cash/(debt) 154 (759) 10 (247) (842)
Increase/(decrease) in profit for the year (after tax) 1 (6) – (1) (6)
These changes are the result of the exposure to interest rates from the Group’s floating rate cash and cash equivalents and debt. The
sensitivity gains and losses given above may vary because cash flows vary throughout the year and interest rate and currency
hedging may be implemented after the year end date in order to comply with the treasury policies outlined above.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its
contractual obligations.
The Group’s policy is to minimise its exposure to credit risk from the failure of any single financial counterparty by spreading its risk
across a portfolio of financial counterparties and managing the aggregate exposure to each against certain pre-agreed limits.
Exposure to counterparty credit risk arising from deposits and derivatives (including forward currency contracts and cross currency
swaps) is concentrated at the Group centre where possible. Financial counterparty limits are derived from the long and short term
credit ratings, and the balance sheet strength of the financial counterparty. All financial counterparties are required to have a
minimum long term credit rating from Moody’s of Baa2 and a short term credit rating from Moody’s of P-1 or equivalent from another
recognised agency. To reduce credit exposures, the Group has International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master
Agreements with all of its counterparties for financial derivatives, which permit net settlement of assets and liabilities in certain
circumstances. The maximum exposure to credit risk resulting from financial activities, without considering netting arrangements, is
equal to the carrying value of the Group’s financial assets.
The Group’s policy to manage the credit risk associated with trade and other receivables is set out in note 15.
HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The following section describes the derivative financial instruments the Group uses to apply the interest rate and foreign currency
hedging strategies described above.
1. Derivatives that are designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value (IFRS 9).
2. Derivatives carried at ‘fair value through profit or loss’ (IFRS 9).
3. Derivatives that are designated and effective in net investment hedges carried at fair value (IFRS 9).
2019 2018
Fair value Cash flow Fair value Cash flow
NOTIONAL AMOUNT OF DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS swaps swaps swaps swaps
BY CURRENCY £m £m £m £m
Sterling 550 1,342 550 –
US Dollar 529 186 692 522
Euro 1,548 442 1,514 499
Japanese Yen – 92 – 118
Other – 143 – 277
Total 2,627 2,205 2,756 1,416
1. Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are included in the other non-cash movements caption in note 27).
2. Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are included in the currency translation gains/(losses) caption in note 27).
1. Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are included in the other non-cash movements caption in note 27).
2. Non-cash item (changes in the value of this non-cash item are included in the currency translation (losses)/gains caption in note 27).
The Group has Supply Chain Financing (SCF) arrangements in place. The principal purpose of these arrangements is to enable the
supplier, if it so wishes, to sell its receivables due from the Group to a third party bank prior to their due date, thus providing earlier
access to liquidity. From the Group’s perspective, the invoice payment due date remains unaltered and the payment terms of
suppliers participating in the SCF programmes are similar to those suppliers that are not participating, and to the wider industry
more generally. If a receivable is purchased by a third party bank, that third party bank does not benefit from additional security
when compared to the security originally enjoyed by the supplier.
At 30 September 2019, the value of invoices sold under the SCF programmes was £575 million, with £541 million related to the
Group’s programme in the USA (2018: £478 million and £444 million respectively). These amounts are included within trade
payables and all cash flows associated with the programmes are included within operating cash flow as they continue to be part of
the normal operating cycle of the Company.
2018
Between 1 and Between 2 and Between 3 Between 4 Over
2 years 3 years and 4 years and 5 years 5 years Total
TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES £m £m £m £m £m £m
Trade and other payables 45 132 28 3 12 220
The directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates to their fair value. The current trade and
other payables are payable on demand.
Trade payable days at 30 September 2019 were 81 days (2018: 78 days) on a constant currency basis.
21 PROVISIONS
1. Including items reclassified between accrued liabilities and other balance sheet captions.
2019 2018
PROVISIONS £m £m
Current 223 167
Non-current 266 227
Total provisions 489 394
Provisions in respect of discontinued and disposed of businesses relate to estimated amounts payable in connection with onerous
contracts and claims arising from disposals. The final amount payable remains uncertain as, at the date of approval of these financial
statements, there remains a further period during which claims may be received. The timing of any settlement will depend upon the
nature and extent of claims received.
Provisions for onerous contracts represent the liabilities in respect of short and long term leases and other contracts which will be
utilised over the life of each individual contract. A full analysis is performed at least annually of the future profitability of all contracts
with marginal performances and of the balance sheet items directly linked to these contracts.
Provisions for legal and other claims relate principally to provisions for the estimated cost of litigation and other sundry claims. The
timing of the settlement of these claims is uncertain.
Provisions for severance primarily include people costs such as redundancy costs and cost of people change associated with the
cost action programme. The Group expects these provisions to be substantially utilised within the next two years.
Other provisions include environmental provisions. These are in respect of potential liabilities relating to the Group’s responsibility
for maintaining its operating sites in accordance with statutory requirements and the Group’s aim to have a low impact on
the environment. These provisions are expected to be utilised as operating sites are disposed of or as environmental matters
are resolved.
Provisions are discounted to present value where the effect is material using the discount rate applicable to the liability. In estimating
the provisions above management have made estimates and used assumptions in determining the nature, amount and timing of
potential outflows. Management do not consider that any of the provision estimates made at the date of the balance sheet are at a
significant risk of a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the liability recorded or any contract related balances.
The contributions payable for defined contribution schemes of £126 million (2018: £110 million) have been fully expensed against
profits in the current year.
UK SCHEMES
UK employees that are in a pension arrangement are either in the Compass Retirement Income Savings Plan (CRISP) because they
meet the eligibility criteria, in a GAD section of the Compass Group Pension Plan (the Plan) or have been automatically enrolled into
the National Employment Savings Trust (NEST).
CRISP was launched on 1 February 2003 and has been the main vehicle for pension provision for eligible new joiners in the UK since
that date. CRISP is a defined contribution (money purchase) arrangement whereby the Group will match employee contributions up
to 6% of pay (minimum 5%). Within CRISP a new defined contribution section was established from April 2006 known as the
Compass Higher Income Plan (CHIP). Senior employees who contribute to CRISP are offered an additional employer-only
contribution into CHIP. The amount of contribution and eligibility for CHIP are decided annually at the Company’s discretion. A CHIP
payment may be taken in part, or in whole, as a cash allowance instead of a pension contribution.
CRISP has a corporate trustee. The Chairman is a former employee of the Group. The other six trustee directors are UK based
employees of the Group, three of whom have been nominated by CRISP members.
The Plan is a defined benefit arrangement. Those UK employees who transfer from the public sector under the Transfer of
Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, typically up until 31 March 2015, have been eligible to join the Plan,
which has otherwise been closed to new entrants since 2003. Such transferees entered into the GAD sections of the Plan and are
known as ‘GAD members’. However, under the Government’s revised guidance for ‘Fair Deal for staff pensions’, the expectation is
and therefore the approach has been that the Group participates in the relevant public-sector pension scheme and closes the Plan
to future entrants. The Plan closed to future accrual for all existing members, other than GAD members, on 5 April 2010. The
affected members were offered membership of CRISP from 6 April 2010.
By agreement with the trustees, the Company is no longer funding any deficit. The next triennial valuation is due to be completed
as at 5 April 2022. The Plan is reappraised annually by independent actuaries in accordance with IAS 19 ‘Employee benefits’
requirements.
The Plan has a corporate trustee. There is an independent chairman and one other independent trustee director. There are a further
five trustee directors, who are either UK based employees or former employees of the Group (three of whom have been nominated
by Plan members).
The Company is subject to the Pension Automatic Enrolment Regulations for its workforce in the UK. All new UK employees who
meet the statutory eligibility criteria, and who do not join CRISP or the Plan, are automatically enrolled into the NEST. Responsibility
The Lloyds Banking Group’s High Court hearing on Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation was published on 26 October
2018. As a result, and based on actuarial advice, the Group has recognised £12 million of past service costs in the consolidated
income statement. This non-cash charge has been excluded from the Group’s underlying operating profit.
OVERSEAS SCHEMES
In the USA, the defined benefit plans are frozen to new participants and the main vehicles for retirement are the defined contribution
plans. The actuary provides Compass USA with the contributions required each year to the defined benefit plans, in order to work
towards a 100% funding level on a projected salary basis.
Compass USA participates in a number of unions and is required to abide by the individual collective bargaining agreements (CBA)
negotiated with each union. Under the terms of these CBAs, Compass USA is required to pay the union members’ salary and
contribute to various multi-employer benefit plans which include (i) post employment benefits, including pensions and post
employment healthcare, (ii) defined contribution plans, such as 401(k) and annuity and savings plans and (iii) other plans which
include legal funds, training funds and education funds.
Participation in multi-employer pension plans bears risks that differ from single-employer plans. These risks include:
• assets contributed to the plans by Compass USA may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers
• if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan for any reason, the unfunded obligation remaining may transition to the
remaining employers participating in the plan
• if Compass USA stops participating in the plan for any reason, the company may be required to pay a proportionate amount to the
plan for its share of the unfunded liability, known as a withdrawal liability
Compass USA is involved with 37 multi-employer benefit plans (2018: 38). The Group is not aware of, and has no reasonable
expectation that, any plan in which it currently participates is in imminent danger of becoming insolvent, or is likely to experience a
mass withdrawal.
These plans are accounted for as defined contribution plans, as the information provided by the plan administrators is insufficient for
them to be accounted for as defined benefit plans. The Group made total contributions of £21 million in the year (2018: £17 million)
to these arrangements.
In Canada, Germany, Norway, Spain and Switzerland, the Group also participates in funded defined benefit arrangements.
In other countries, Group employees participate primarily in state arrangements to which the Group makes the appropriate contributions.
Other than where required by local regulation or statute, the defined benefit schemes are closed to new entrants. For these schemes
the current service cost will increase under the projected unit credit method as the members of the schemes approach retirement.
The Group takes advice from independent actuaries relating to the appropriateness of the assumptions which include life
expectancy of members, expected salary and pension increases, and inflation. It is important to note that comparatively small
changes in the assumptions used may have a significant effect on the consolidated income statement and balance sheet.
The liabilities of the defined benefit schemes are measured by discounting the best estimate of future cash flows to be paid using
the projected unit method. This method is an accrued benefits valuation method that makes allowances for projected earnings.
These calculations are performed by a qualified actuary.
Disclosures showing the assets and liabilities of the schemes are set out below. These have been calculated using the following
assumptions:
The mortality assumptions used to value the current year UK pension schemes are derived from the S3PA generational mortality
tables (2018: S2PA generational mortality tables) with improvements in line with the projection model prepared by the 2018
Continuous Mortality Investigation of the UK actuarial profession (2018: 2015 model), with an S-kappa of 7.5, with 115% weighting
for male non-pensioners, 111% for male pensioners (2018: +0.2 years age rating for male non-pensioners, -0.2 years age rating for
male pensioners) and 102% weighting for all females (2018: -0.1 years age rating for all females), with a long term underpin of
1.5% p.a. (2018: 1.25% p.a.). These mortality assumptions take account of experience to date and assumptions for further
improvements in the life expectancy of scheme members. The Group estimates the average duration of the UK and USA plans’
liabilities to be 18 years (2018: 18 years) and nine years (2018: 9 years) respectively.
Examples of the resulting life expectancies for the UK Plan are as follows:
2019 2018
LIFE EXPECTANCY AT AGE 65 Male Female Male Female
Member aged 65 in 2019 (2018) 21.5 24.4 22.6 24.5
Member aged 65 in 2044 (2043) 23.4 26.5 24.4 26.9
The other demographic assumptions have been set having regard to the latest trends in scheme experience and other relevant data.
The assumptions are reviewed and updated as necessary as part of the periodic actuarial valuation of pension schemes.
For the overseas schemes, regionally appropriate assumptions have been used where recommended by local actuaries. The
mortality assumptions used to value USA schemes are derived from the RP2014 combined healthy table, generational MP2018
scale. Examples of the resulting life expectancies for the US schemes are as follows:
2019 2018
Interest A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase the As part of the investment strategy, the UK Plan aims to
rate schemes’ benefit obligations under IAS 19. The mitigate this risk through investment in a liability driven
schemes are therefore exposed to the risk that falls in investment (LDI) portfolio. LDI is a form of investing
interest rates will decrease the schemes’ surplus. designed to match to a large extent the movement in
pension plan assets with the movement in projected
benefit obligations over time.
Inflation The schemes' benefit obligations are linked to inflation. The UK Plan contains caps on increases to scheme
A higher rate of expected long term inflation will benefits to mitigate the risk of increase in inflation.
therefore lead to higher liabilities, both for the IAS 19 Additionally the UK Plan invests in LDI products which
and funding liability. increase (decrease) in value when expectations of
future inflation rates increase (fall), thus providing
ASSUMPTION Change in assumption Impact on scheme obligation 2019 Impact on scheme obligation 2018
UK
Discount rate Increase by 0.5% Decrease by £212 million Decrease by £188 million
Decrease by 0.5% Increase by £227 million Increase by £201 million
Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £139 million Increase by £110 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £117 million Decrease by £106 million
CPI Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £31 million Increase by £25 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £26 million Decrease by £24 million
Life expectations from age 65 Increase by 1 year Increase by £105 million Increase by £89 million
USA AND OTHERS
Discount rate Increase by 0.5% Decrease by £15 million Decrease by £12 million
Decrease by 0.5% Increase by £16 million Increase by £13 million
Inflation Increase by 0.5% Increase by £6 million Increase by £5 million
Decrease by 0.5% Decrease by £6 million Decrease by £5 million
Life expectations from age 65 Increase by 1 year Increase by £6 million Increase by £5 million
The sensitivities above consider the impact of the single change shown, with the other assumptions assumed to be unchanged. The
sensitivity analyses have been determined based on a method that extrapolates the impact on the defined benefit obligations as a
result of reasonable changes in key assumptions occurring at the end of the reporting period. In practice, changes in one assumption
may be accompanied by offsetting changes in another assumption (although this is not always the case). The impact of a change in
the UK inflation rate shown above includes the impact of a change in both the RPI and CPI inflation rates.
The UK Plan has holdings of diversified global equity type investments, mainly shares in listed companies. The return on these
investments is variable, and they are generally considered to be ‘riskier’ investments. However, it is generally accepted that the yield
on these investments will contain a premium to compensate investors for this additional risk. There is significant uncertainty about
the likely size of this risk premium. In respect of investments held in global equities there is also a risk of unfavourable currency
movements. The trustee manages these risks by holding approximately 50% of those investments in funds which are hedged against
currency movements.
The UK Plan also holds corporate bonds and other fixed interest securities. The risk of default on these is assessed by various rating
agencies. Some of these bond investments are issued by HM Government. The risk of default on these is lower compared to the risk
on corporate bond investments, although some risk may remain. The expected yield on bond investments with fixed interest rates
can be derived exactly from their market value.
1. The Lloyds Banking Group’s High Court hearing on Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation was published on 26 October 2018. As a result, and
based on actuarial advice, the Group has recognised £12 million of past service costs in the consolidated income statement.
2019
POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT ASSETS/(OBLIGATIONS) UK1 Total UK2 USA Other Total
RECOGNISED IN THE BALANCE SHEET £m £m £m £m £m £m
Present value of defined benefit obligations (2,380) (2,380) (52) (547) (204) (803)
Fair value of plan assets 2,828 2,828 – 439 105 544
Post employment benefit asset/(obligations) recognised in
the balance sheet 448 448 (52) (108) (99) (259)
2018
POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFIT ASSETS/(OBLIGATIONS) UK1 Total UK2 USA Other Total
RECOGNISED IN THE BALANCE SHEET £m £m £m £m £m £m
Present value of defined benefit obligations (2,079) (2,079) (48) (485) (173) (706)
Fair value of plan assets 2,425 2,425 – 385 97 482
Post employment benefit asset/(obligation) recognised in
the balance sheet 346 346 (48) (100) (76) (224)
Certain Group companies have taken out life insurance policies and invested in mutual funds which will be used to meet unfunded
pension obligations. The current value of these policies and other assets, £74 million (2018: £56 million), may not be offset against
pension obligations under IAS 19 and is reported within note 14.
1. The Lloyds Banking Group’s High Court hearing on Guaranteed Minimum Pension (GMP) equalisation was published on 26 October 2018. As a result, and
based on actuarial advice, the Group has recognised £12 million of past service costs in the income statement.
2. Compass Group USA Inc. Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees was settled. As a result, a £5 million loss was recognised in the consolidated income
statement on the settlement of the scheme liabilities for the year ended 30 September 2018.
The UK Plan is the largest scheme within the Group and was in surplus on a funding basis at the date of the most recent actuarial
valuation as at 5 April 2019 and so no deficit contributions are currently required. The remaining Group funded schemes do not have
significant minimum funding requirements whilst contributions to unfunded pension schemes are quite stable. As a result, we do not
expect the required future contributions to change substantially beyond next year.
2019 2018
ALLOTTED SHARE CAPITAL Number of shares £m Number of shares £m
Allotted and fully paid:
Ordinary shares of 111/20 pence each 1,589,736,625 176 1,589,736,625 176
At 30 September 176 176
24 SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
INCOME STATEMENT EXPENSE
The Group recognised an expense of £27 million (2018: £21 million) in respect of share-based payment transactions. All share-
based payment plans are equity-settled.
The following table shows the movement in share awards during the year:
2019 2018
LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLANS Number of shares Number of shares
Outstanding at 1 October 5,897,389 6,306,286
Awarded 2,191,879 2,252,014
Vested (1,779,067) (1,717,595)
Lapsed (518,350) (943,316)
Outstanding at 30 September 5,791,851 5,897,389
The fair value of awards subject to FCF and ROCE performance targets was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The vesting probability of each element has been assessed based on a simulation model of the FCF and ROCE forecasts.
The weighted average share price at the date of vesting for LTIP awards vested during 2019 was 1,673.00 pence
(2018: 1,538.44 pence).
The LTIP awards outstanding at the end of the year have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.4 years
(2018: 1.4 years).
For the year ended 30 September 2019, a Board LTIP award was made on 21 November 2018 and 16 May 2019 for which the
estimated fair value was 1,185.63 pence and 1,229.53 pence respectively. Leadership LTIP awards were also made on
21 November 2018 and 16 May 2019 for which the estimated fair value were 1,366.01 pence and 1,227.53 pence respectively.
For the year ended 30 September 2018, a Board LTIP award was made on 9 February 2018 for which the estimated fair value was
1,071.36 pence. Leadership LTIP awards were also made on 22 November 2017 and 10 May 2018 for which the estimated fair
value were 1,252.19 pence and 1,040.24 pence respectively.
These awards were all made under the terms of the 2010 LTIP. The inputs to the option pricing model are reassessed for each
award. The following assumptions were used in calculating the fair value of LTIP awards made during the year:
SHARE OPTIONS
Full details of The Compass Group Share Option Plan 2010, the Compass Group Share Option Plan, the Compass Group
Management Share Option Plan and the UK Sharesave Plan are set out in prior years’ annual reports which are available on the
Company’s website.
RESTRICTED SHARES
These are occasional awards to certain employees in order to incentivise the achievement of particular business objectives under
specific circumstances or where similar such shares have been forfeited by a new employee on joining the Company. The plan can
On 12 December 2018, Compass Group USA, Inc., a USA subsidiary of the Group, purchased the trading net assets of Client
Rewards for an initial consideration of £164 million ($209 million). Client Rewards is an Iowa based company that provides
procurement and supply chain management services. The preliminary goodwill in relation to the assets acquired is £78 million
($100 million).
In addition to the acquisition set out above, the Group has also completed several smaller bolt-on acquisitions in several countries. A
summary of all acquisitions completed during the period is included below:
2019 2018
Book value Fair value Book value Fair value
£m £m £m £m
Net assets acquired
Goodwill arising on acquisition – 198 – 312
Contract related and other intangibles arising on acquisition 18 268 27 243
Trade and other receivables 33 33 46 46
Other assets 30 30 21 21
Cash and cash equivalents 12 12 9 9
Deferred tax – (27) – (39)
Trade and other payables (46) (46) (51) (51)
Other liabilities (14) (14) (15) (16)
Fair value of net assets acquired 454 525
Non-controlling interest acquired – (4)
Satisfied by
Cash consideration 422 406
Contingent consideration1 32 115
Total consideration 454 521
Cash flow
Cash consideration 422 406
Cash acquired (12) (9)
Acquisition transaction costs 8 4
Net cash outflow arising on acquisition 418 401
Deferred consideration and other payments relating to previous
acquisitions 33 19
Total cash outflow arising from the purchase of subsidiary companies 451 420
1. Contingent consideration is an estimate at the date of acquisition of the amount of additional consideration that will be payable in the future. The actual
amount paid can vary from the estimate depending on the terms of the transaction and, for example, the actual performance of the acquired business.
The adjustments made in respect of acquisitions in the year to 30 September 2019 are provisional and will be finalised within 12
months of the acquisition date, principally in relation to the valuation of contracts acquired.
The goodwill arising on the acquisition of the businesses represents the premium the Group paid to acquire companies which
complement the existing business and create significant opportunities for cross-selling and other synergies. The goodwill arising is
not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
In the period from acquisition to 30 September 2019, the acquisitions contributed revenue of £123 million and operating profit of
£14 million to the Group’s results (2018: £210 million and £13 million respectively).
If the acquisitions had occurred on 1 October 2018, it is estimated that the combined sales of Group and equity accounted joint
ventures for the year would have been £25,308 million and total Group operating profit (including associates) would have been
£1,608 million.
As a result of this review, the Group is in the process of selling or exiting its operations in a number of countries, sectors or
businesses. The Group has successfully completed the disposal of several businesses, including its operations in South Africa,
Vision Security Group in the UK, Sports & Leisure in Japan and part of its US laundries business. The Group's consolidated income
statement includes a £7 million net loss on sale and closure of businesses (2018: £58 million loss) and a related tax credit of
£3 million. The net loss includes £57 million of asset write downs and exit costs relating to committed or completed business exits
and those that were held for sale which has been offset by a net gain of £50 million (2018: £3 million loss) on completed disposals.
Included within the net loss is a £22 million write down of net assets for businesses that are held for sale where the carrying amount
was higher than net realisable value (2018: £19 million).
As at the balance sheet date, the Group has classified certain businesses as held for sale as these disposals are highly probable and
are expected to be completed within 12 months.
The major classes of assets and liabilities classified as held for sale as at year end are as follows:
Cumulative income or expenses included in other comprehensive income relating to these businesses amount to £38 million of
foreign exchange gain (2018: £21 million loss).
The non-recurring fair value measurement of the businesses held for sale is categorised as a Level 3 fair value, and is primarily based
on offers received or agreed sale price for these businesses from interested parties.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s full retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’.
Additional information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2019
Cash
CASH FLOWS ARISING (inflow)/
Repayment Borrowing of Repayment Repayment outflow from Purchase of
FROM FINANCING of bank loans bank loans of loan notes of bonds other Dividends own shares Total
ACTIVITIES £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Debt 1,830 (1,830) 195 530 80 – – 805
Equity – – – – – 616 4 620
Total 1,425
2018
Cash
CASH FLOWS ARISING (inflow)/
Repayment Borrowing of Repayment Issue of outflow from Purchase of
FROM FINANCING of bank loans bank loans of loan notes bonds other Dividends own shares Total
ACTIVITIES £m £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
Debt 1,074 (772) – (686) (43) – – (427)
Equity – – – – 5 557 – 562
Total 135
1. Excludes post employment obligations and borrowings (including finance and operating leases) recorded on the balance sheet or disclosed in note 30.
The investigation established serious irregularities in connection with contracts awarded to ESS by the UN. The work undertaken by
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Ernst & Young gave no reason to believe that these issues extended beyond a few individuals
within ESS to other parts of ESS or the wider Compass Group of companies.
The Group settled all outstanding civil litigation against it in relation to this matter in October 2006, but litigation continues between
competitors of ESS, IHC and other parties involved in UN procurement.
IHC’s relationship with the UN and ESS was part of a wider investigation into UN procurement activity being conducted by the United
States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, and with which the Group co-operated fully. The current status of that
investigation is uncertain and a matter for the US authorities. Those investigators could have had access to sources unavailable to
the Group, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer or Ernst & Young, and further information may yet emerge which is inconsistent with, or
The increasingly complex international corporate tax environment and an increase in audit activity from tax authorities means that
the potential for tax uncertainties and disputes has increased. The Group is currently subject to a number of audits and reviews in
jurisdictions around the world that primarily relate to complex corporate tax issues. None of these tax audits is currently expected to
have a material impact on the Group’s financial position. In addition, we continue to engage with tax authorities and other regulatory
bodies on both payroll and sales tax reviews, and compliance with labour laws and regulations. Again, we currently do not expect any
of these to have a material impact on the Group’s financial position.
In April 2019, the European Commission published its final decision on the Group Financing Exemption in the UK’s Controlled
Foreign Company legislation concluding that part of the legislation is in breach of EU State Aid rules. Like many other multinational
groups that have acted in accordance with the UK legislation in force at the time, the Group may be affected. The UK government
and UK-based multinational companies, including Compass, have appealed to the General Court of the European Union against the
decision. The UK government is required to start collection proceedings in advance of the appeal results and it is possible that the
Group will be required to make a payment in the year ending 30 September 2020. At present it is not possible to determine the
amount that the UK government will seek to collect. If the decision of the European Commission is upheld, we have calculated our
maximum potential liability to be £113 million at 30 September 2019. The final impact on the Group remains uncertain and our
current assessment is that no provision is required.
During the course of the year, the federal tax authorities in Brazil have issued a number of notices of deficiency which we have
formally objected to and which are now proceeding through the appeals process. These assessments relate primarily to the PIS /
COFINS treatment of certain food costs and the corporate income tax treatment of goodwill deductions. As at 30 September 2019,
the total amount assessed in respect of these matters is £44 million. The possibility of further assessments cannot be ruled out and
the judicial process is likely to take a number of years to conclude. Based on the opinion of our local legal advisors, we do not
currently consider it likely that we will have to settle a liability with respect to these matters, and on this basis no provision has been
recorded. We therefore do not currently expect any of these issues to have a material impact on the Group’s financial position.
OUTCOME
Although it is not possible to predict the outcome or quantify the financial effect of these proceedings, or any claim against the Group
related thereto, in the opinion of the directors, any uninsured losses resulting from the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material effect on the financial position of the Group. The timing of the settlement of these proceedings or claims is uncertain.
Future minimum rentals payable under non-cancellable operating leases and concessions agreements are as follows:
2019 2018
Operating leases Other Operating leases Other
Land and Other occupancy Land and Other occupancy
OPERATING LEASE AND buildings assets rentals buildings assets rentals
CONCESSIONS COMMITMENTS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Falling due within 1 year 81 90 61 70 71 75
Falling due between 2 and 5 years 221 167 106 188 127 154
Falling due in more than 5 years 241 27 108 150 11 162
Total 543 284 275 408 209 391
SUBSIDIARIES
Transactions between the ultimate Parent Company and its subsidiaries, and between subsidiaries, have been eliminated
on consolidation.
JOINT VENTURES
There were no significant transactions between joint ventures or joint venture partners and the rest of the Group during the year.
ASSOCIATES
The balances with associated undertakings are shown in note 15. There were no significant transactions with associated
undertakings during the year.
1. Average rates are used to translate the income statement and cash flow statement. Closing rates are used to translate the balance sheet. Only the most
significant currencies are shown.
1. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
2. Underlying constant currency earnings per share is based on a Group constant currency profit attributable to equity shareholders of the Company and
includes positive constant currency adjustment of £39 million net of £12 million constant currency adjustment to income tax expense.
1. Underlying revenue and underlying operating profit include share of profit of joint ventures and associates classified as held for sale during the year.
2. Prior year comparatives have been restated as a result of the Group’s retrospective adoption of IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. Additional
information about the impact of IFRS 15 is included in note 1.
IZD Tower, Wagramer Strasse 19/4. Stock, 1959 Upper Water Street, Suite 1100,
1220 Wien, Austria Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3J 3E5, Canada
Compass Group Austria Holdings One GmbH Austria 100 East Coast Catering (NS) Limited Canada 100
Compass Group Austria Holdings Two GmbH Austria 100
Eurest Restaurationbetriebs GmbH Austria 100
Kunz Gebäudereinigung GmbH Austria 100
421 7th Avenue SW, Suite 1600, Calgary, Jankovcova, 1603/47a, Holešovice 170 00,
Alberta, T2P 4K9, Canada Prague 7, Czech Republic
Great West Catering Ltd Canada 100 Compass Group Czech Republic s.r.o. Czech Republic 100
Tamarack Catering Ltd Canada 100 SCOLAREST- zařízení školního stravování Czech Republic 100
spol. s.r.o
Autopista Norte No. 235 – 71, Bogota D.C., 40, Bd de Dunkerque, 13002 Marseille,
Colombia France
Compass Group Services Colombia S.A. Colombia 100 Société International D’Assistance SA (ii) France 100
Enceinte de Brometo Centre Ville, BP 5208, Lieu Dit la Prade, 81580 Soual, France
Pointe-Noire, The Democratic Republic of Occitanie Restauration SAS France 100
the Congo
Eurest Services Congo SARL (ii) Congo 100
3 rue Camille Claudel Atlanparc Bat.M,
Zone Kerluherne, CS 20043, 56890
Plescop, France
Oceane de Restauration SAS France 100
Calle Jaime Balmes 11, Oficina 101 letra D, Drengsrudbekken 12, 1383, PO Box 74,
Colonia Los Morales Polanco, Alcaldía NO-1371, Asker, Norway
Miguel Hidalgo, 11510 Ciudad de México,
Eurest A/S (iii) (iv) Norway 100
Mexico
Eurest Proper Meals de Mexico Mexico 100
S.A. de C.V. (iii) (iv) Forusparken 2, 4031 Stavanger, Postboks
8083 Stavanger Postterminal, 4068,
Servicios Corporativos Eurest-Proper Meals Mexico 100
Stavanger, Norway
de Mexico S.A. De C.V. (iii) (iv)
ESS Mobile Offshore Units A/S Norway 100
ESS Support Services A/S Norway 100
c/o 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington,
DE 19808, USA
Food Works of Mexico, Mexico 100 c/o Warner Shand Lawyers Waigani, Level 1
S. de R.L. de C.V. (ii) (iii) (iv) RH Hypermarket, Allotment 1 Section 479
(off Kennedy Road), Gordons NCD, Papua
Food Works Services of Mexico, S. de R.L. Mexico 100
New Guinea
De C.V. (ii) (iii) (iv)
Eurest (PNG) Catering & Services Ltd (ii) Papua New 100
Guinea
Laarderhoogtweg 11, 1101 DZ, Amsterdam,
Netherlands
Unit 2410 24th flr City & Land Mega Plaza
Aurora HoldCo B.V. Netherlands 100
Adb Ave. Ortigas Ctr. San Antonio, Pasig
CGI Holdings (2) B.V. Netherlands 100 City 1605, Philippines
Compass Group Holding B.V. Netherlands 100 Compass Group Philippines Inc (ii) Philippines 100
Compass Group Finance Netherlands B.V. Netherlands 100
Compass Group International 10 B.V. (ii) Netherlands 100 Ul. Olbrachta 94, 01-102 Warszawa, Poland
Compass Group International 2 B.V. Netherlands 100 Compass Group Poland Sp. Z o.o. Poland 100
Compass Group International 3 B.V. Netherlands 100
Compass Group International 4 B.V. Netherlands 100 Edíficio Prime, Avenida da, Quinta Grande,
Compass Group International 5 B.V. Netherlands 100 53-60, Alfragide 2614-521 Amadora,
Compass Group International 6 B.V. (ii) Netherlands 100 Portugal
Compass Group International 9 B.V. Netherlands 100 Eurest (Portugal) – Sociedade Europeia de Portugal 100
Restaurantes, Lda.
Compass Group International ESS Netherlands 100
Shanghai B.V. Eurest Catering & Services Group Portugal, Lda. Portugal 100
Compass Group International Finance 1 B.V. Netherlands 100
Compass Group International Finance 2 B.V. Netherlands 100 Bucureşti Sectorul 4, Strada Sold.,
Ilie Şerban, Nr. 8B., Romania
Compass Group Shanghai Eurest B.V. (ii) Netherlands 100
Eurest ROM SRL Romania 100
Compass Group Vending Holding B.V. Netherlands 100
Compass Hotels Chertsey B.V. Netherlands 100
Eurest Services B.V. Netherlands 100
Eurest Support Services (ESS) B.V. Netherlands 100
Eurest Support Services Sakhalin B.V. (ii) Netherlands 100
Stichting Forte International Netherlands 100
8 Marina Boulevard, # 05-02, Marina Bay Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai, United
Financial Centre, 018981, Singapore Arab Emirates
FO-110, Torshavn, Faroe Islands Level 54, Tower 2, PETRONAS Twin Towers,
P/F Eurest Føroyar Denmark 51 Kuala Lumpur City Centre,50088 Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia
Convex Malaysia SDN BHD Malaysia 21
123 avenue de la République – Hall A,
92320 Châtillon, France
Sopregim SAS France 80 Suite 1301, 13th Floor, City Plaza Jalan
Tebrau, 80300 Johor Bahru Johor, Malaysia
Knusford Compass Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia 49
Steenbeker Weg 25, 24106, Kiel, Germany
Lubinus – orgaMed Sterilgut GmbH Germany 49
51/52 II Piazetta, Valletta, Malta
Eurest (Malta) Ltd (ii) (iii) Malta 51
Konrad-Zuse-Platz 2, 81829 München,
Germany
Leonardi EPM GmbH Germany 75 1 Avenue Henri Dunant, Palais De La Scala,
3eme, Etage – No 1125, 98000 MC, Monaco
Leonardi Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH Germany 75
Eurest Monaco S.A. (ii) Monaco 99.99
Leonardi Betriebsverwaltungs GmbH Germany 75
Leonardi GmbH & Co. KG Germany 75
Laarderhoogtweg 11, 1101 DZ, Amsterdam,
Leonardi Kaffee neu entdecken GmbH & Co. KG Germany 75
Netherlands
Compass Group International Netherlands 100
Hutschiner Straße 8, 81677, München, Coöperatief W.A. (x)
Germany
Compass Group International Netherlands 100
Leonardi SVM GmbH Germany 75 Coöperatief 2 W.A. (x)
Compass Group International Netherlands 100
Grillparzerstraße 8, 81675, München, Coöperatief 3 W.A. (x)
Germany Compass Group International Finance C.V. (x) Netherlands 100
Leonardi HPM GmbH Germany 75
Bdo Spicers, Level 8, 120 Albert Street,
MZSK & Associates, Chartered Accountants, Auckland, New Zealand
Level 9, The Ruby, Senapati Bapat Road, AEG Ogden (NZ) LTD New Zealand 44
Dadar-W, Mumbai 400028, India
AEG Ogden Hyderabad Pvt Ltd India 44
Okesnoyveien 16, 1366, Lysaker, 1366,
Norway
Hamarikyu Kensetsu Plaza, 5-5-12, Tsukiji, Forplejningstjenester A/S Norway 33.33
Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Chiyoda Kyushoku Services Co., Ltd Japan 90
c/o Warner Shand Lawyers Waigani, Level 1 Parklands Court, 24 Parklands, Birmingham
RH Hypermarket, Allotment 1 Section 479 Great Park, Rubery, Birmingham, B45 9PZ,
(off Kennedy Road), Gordons NCD, Papua United Kingdom
New Guinea Quaglino’s Limited UK 99
Eurest OKAS Catering Ltd (ii) Papua New 55 Chartwells Hounslow (Feeding Futures) UK 75
Guinea Limited (iii) (iv)
Eurest Lotic (PNG) JV Ltd (ii) Papua New 50 Eat Dot Limited (ii) (iii) UK 57.05
Guinea
Quadrant Catering Limited (iii) (iv) UK 49
CLASSIFICATIONS KEY
111 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10011, (i) Directly owned by Compass Group PLC
USA (ii) Dormant/non-trading
(iii) A Ordinary shares
RA Patina Management LLC USA 50 (iv) B Ordinary shares
(v) C Ordinary and/or Special shares
(vi) D, E and/or F Ordinary shares
Corporation Trust Centre, 1209 Orange
(vii) Deferred shares
Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, USA (viii) Preference including cumulative, non-cumulative and redeemable shares
AEG Facilities, LLC USA 49 (ix) Redeemable shares
AEG Facilities Canada Holdings, LP USA 49 (x) No share capital, share of profits
(xi) Limited by guarantee
AEG Management Bakersfield, LLC USA 49
AEG Management Brooklyn, LLC USA 49
AEG Management Chicago, LLC USA 49
AEG Management DL, LLC USA 49
AEG Management FL, LLC USA 49
AEG Management Glendale, LLC USA 49
2019 2018
COMPASS GROUP PLC Notes £m £m
FIXED ASSETS
Investments 2 1,061 1,035
CURRENT ASSETS
Debtors: amounts falling due within one year 3 7,521 10,068
Debtors: amounts falling due after more than one year 3 2,202 83
Cash at bank and in hand 39 605
Current assets 9,762 10,756
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
Creditors: amounts falling due within one year1 4 (4,972) (5,826)
NET CURRENT ASSETS
Net current assets 4,790 4,930
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES
Total assets less current liabilities1 5,851 5,965
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE AFTER MORE THAN ONE YEAR
Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year1 4 (3,684) (3,641)
Provisions for liabilities 5 (3) (3)
Net assets 2,164 2,321
EQUITY
Share capital 7 176 176
Share premium account 182 182
Capital redemption reserve 295 295
Share-based payment reserve 259 232
Profit and loss reserve 1,252 1,436
1. Represented to reclassify £1,107 million creditors falling due within one year to creditors falling due after more than one year. As a result, net current assets
and creditors falling due after more than one year have increased by the same amount. There has been no change to net assets.
Approved by the Board of Directors on 26 November 2019 and signed on its behalf by
Dominic Blakemore, Director
Karen Witts, Director
Capital Share-based
Share Share premium redemption payment Profit and loss
capital account reserve reserve reserve Total
EQUITY £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 1 October 2017 176 182 295 211 1,127 1,991
Fair value of share-based payments – – – 21 – 21
Dividends paid to shareholders – – – – (548) (548)
Profit for the year – – – – 857 857
At 30 September 2018 176 182 295 232 1,436 2,321
Fair value of share-based payments – – – 27 – 27
Dividends paid to shareholders – – – – (611) (611)
Profit for the year – – – – 427 427
At 30 September 2019 176 182 295 259 1,252 2,164
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage Fair value is measured using either the binomial distribution or
its exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and Black-Scholes option pricing models as is most appropriate for
interest rates. Derivative instruments utilised include interest each scheme. The expected life used in the models has been
rate swaps, currency swaps and forward currency contracts. The adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects
Company and Group policy is disclosed in the accounting of exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
policies to the consolidated financial statements.
The issue of share incentives by the Company to employees of
Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of its subsidiaries represents additional capital contributions. An
transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated addition to the Company’s investment in Group undertakings is
at amortised cost unless they are part of a fair value hedge reported with a corresponding increase in shareholders’ funds.
accounting relationship. Borrowings that are part of a fair value For details of the charge see note 24 to the consolidated
hedge accounting relationship are measured at amortised cost financial statements.
adjusted for the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged.
J FINANCIAL GUARANTEES AND LOAN COMMITMENTS
Amounts owed by or to Group undertakings are initially Financial guarantee contract liabilities are measured initially at
measured at fair value and are subsequently reported at their fair values. These liabilities are subsequently measured at
amortised cost. Allowance losses on intercompany receivables the higher of the amount determined under IAS 37 and the
are calculated by reviewing 12-month expected credit losses amount initially recognised (fair value) less where appropriate,
using historic and forward looking data on credit risk. cumulative amortisation of the initial amount recognised.
G DIVIDENDS
Dividends are recognised in the Company’s financial statements
in the year in which they are approved in general meeting by the
Company’s shareholders. Interim dividends are recognised
when paid.
H DEFERRED TAX
Deferred tax is provided at the anticipated rates on temporary
differences arising from the inclusion of items of income and
expenditure in tax computations in periods different from those
in which they are included in the financial statements. Deferred
tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as
more likely than not that they will be recovered.
I SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
The Group issues equity-settled share-based payments to
certain employees. Equity-settled share-based payments are
measured at fair value (excluding the effect of non market-based
vesting conditions) at the date of grant. The fair value
determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based
payments is expensed on a straight line basis over the vesting
period, based on the Group’s estimate of the shares that will
eventually vest and adjusted for the effect of the non market-
based vesting conditions.
The Company had no direct employees in the course of the year (2018: none).
2019 2018
AUDIT SERVICES £m £m
Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements 0.9 0.9
Fees payable for other services 0.1 0.1
The principal subsidiary undertakings are listed in note 36 to the consolidated financial statements.
3 DEBTORS
2019 2018
Falling due Falling due
Falling due after more Falling due after more
The book value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due within one year approximates their fair value due to the short
term nature of these receivables.
The fair value of amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year is £1,995 million (2018: £nil). This
approximates book value due to these balances being acquired at fair value shortly prior to 30 September 2019.
2019 2018
Net short term Net short term
temporary temporary
differences differences
MOVEMENT IN DEFERRED TAX ASSET £m £m
At 1 October – –
Charge to income statement 1 –
At 30 September 1 –
The deferred tax asset arises on certain derivative financial instruments and will be recovered no later than the maturity dates
of these instruments.
Details of the derivative financial instruments are shown in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
4 CREDITORS
2019 2018
Falling due Falling due
Falling due after more Falling due after more
within 1 year than 1 year Total within 1 year than 1 year Total
CREDITORS £m £m £m £m £m £m
Bank overdrafts 3 – 3 51 – 51
Bank overdrafts and loans (note 6) 3 – 3 51 – 51
Loan notes 162 1,211 1,373 191 1,261 1,452
Bonds – 1,289 1,289 538 1,240 1,778
Loan notes and bonds (note 6) 162 2,500 2,662 729 2,501 3,230
Derivative financial instruments 7 6 13 12 33 45
Accruals and deferred income 33 – 33 51 – 51
Current tax 17 – 17 11 – 11
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings1 4,750 1,178 5,928 4,972 1,107 6,079
Total 4,972 3,684 8,656 5,826 3,641 9,467
1. Represented to reclassify £1,107 million creditors falling due within one year to creditors falling due after more than one year. These amounts owed to
subsidiary undertakings are arms length interest bearing loans with repayment dates greater than twelve months. There was no change to total creditors.
2019 2018
Carrying Carrying
Nominal value value
LOAN NOTES value Redeemable Interest £m £m
US$ private placement $250m Oct 2018 3.31% – 191
US$ private placement $200m Sep 2020 3.09% 162 153
US$ private placement $398m Oct 2021 3.98% 323 305
US$ private placement $352m Oct 2023 4.12% 301 268
US$ private placement $100m Dec 2024 3.54% 81 76
US$ private placement $300m Sep 2025 3.81% 263 229
US$ private placement $300m Dec 2026 3.64% 243 230
Total 1,373 1,452
The Company has fixed term, fixed interest private placements denominated in US dollar.
2019 2018
Carrying Carrying
Nominal value value
BONDS value Redeemable Interest £m £m
Euro Eurobond €600m Feb 2019 3.13% – 538
Euro Eurobond €500m Jan 2023 1.88% 469 464
Sterling Eurobond £250m Sep 2025 2.00% 260 246
Sterling Eurobond £250m Jun 2026 3.85% 249 249
Sterling Eurobond £300m Jul 2029 2.00% 311 281
Total 1,289 1,778
The book value of amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings falling due within one year approximates their fair value due to the short
term nature of these payables. The fair value of amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings falling due after more than one year is
shown below.
2019 2018
AMOUNTS OWED TO SUBSIDIARY
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
UNDERTAKINGS FALLING DUE AFTER Nominal value value value value
MORE THAN 1 YEAR value Redeemable Interest £m £m £m £m
Euro intercompany loan €750m Jul 2024 0.73% 695 686 669 656
Euro intercompany loan €500m Sep 2028 1.60% 483 489 438 440
Total 1,178 1,175 1,107 1,096
Details of the derivative financial instruments are shown in note 19 to the consolidated financial statements.
Provisions for legal and other claims relates to provisions for the estimated cost of litigation and other sundry claims.
The timing of the settlement of these claims is uncertain.
1. Other includes the debtor and creditor amounts associated with derivative financial instruments.
7 SHARE CAPITAL
Details of the share capital, share option schemes and share-based payments of Compass Group PLC are shown in notes 23 and 24
to the consolidated financial statements.
8 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
2019 2018
CONTINGENT LIABILITIES £m £m
Guarantees and indemnities (including subsidiary undertakings’ overdrafts) 399 411
Parental guarantee issued under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme 1,124 1,113
Total 1,523 1,524
Details regarding certain contingent liabilities which involve the Company are set out in note 28 to the consolidated financial statements.
UNSOLICITED MAIL
We are legally obliged to make our register of members available
to the public, subject to a proper purpose test. As a
consequence of this, some shareholders might receive Shareholder Information
unsolicited mail. Shareholders wishing to limit the amount of
such mail should write to the Mailing Preference Service, MPS
FREEPOST 29 LON20771, London W1E 0ZT. Shareholders can
also register online at www.mpsonline.org.uk or request an
application form by calling from within the UK: 0345 0700 705
or by email: [email protected]. For all other queries, please
contact the MPS team from within the UK: 020 7291 3310.
REPORT A SCAM
If you are approached by fraudsters, please tell the FCA using the share fraud reporting form at www.fca.org.uk/scamsmart, where
you can find out more about investment scams, or call the FCA Consumer Helpline on: Freephone 0800 111 6768.
If you have already paid money to share fraudsters, you should contact Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or online at
www.actionfraud.police.uk.
Directors’ authority to allot shares 21. To authorise the directors subject to the passing of
19. 19.1 To renew the power conferred on the directors by Resolution 19 and in accordance with the power conferred
article 12 of the Company’s articles of association for on the directors by article 13 of the Company’s articles of
a period expiring at the end of the next Annual General association and in addition to any authority granted under
Meeting of the Company after the date on which this Resolution 20 to allot equity securities (as defined in the
Resolution is passed or, if earlier, at close of business Companies Act 2006) for cash under the authority given by
on 5 May 2021; and for that period the section 551 that Resolution and/or to sell ordinary shares held by the
amount shall be £58,432,400. Company as treasury shares for cash as if section 561 of the
19.2 In addition, the section 551 amount shall be increased Companies Act 2006 did not apply to any such allotment or
by £58,432,400 for a period expiring at the end of the sale, such authority to be:
next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the 21.1 limited to the allotment of equity shares or sale of
date on which this Resolution is passed, provided that treasury shares up to a nominal amount of
the directors’ power in respect of such latter amount £8,764,971 being not more than 5% of the issued
shall only be used in connection with a rights issue: ordinary share capital (excluding treasury shares) of
19.2.1 to holders of ordinary shares in proportion (as the Company as at 25 November 2019, being the last
nearly as may be practicable) to their existing practicable date prior to the publication of this Notice;
holdings; and 21.2 used only for the purposes of financing (or refinancing,
19.2.2 to holders of other equity securities as required if the authority is to be used within six months after the
by the rights of those securities or as the original transaction) a transaction which the directors
directors otherwise consider necessary, determine to be an acquisition or other capital
and that the directors may impose any limits or investment of a kind contemplated by the Statement
restrictions and make any arrangements which they of Principles on Disapplying Pre-Emption Rights most
consider necessary to deal with fractional recently published by the Pre-Emption Group prior to
entitlements, legal or practical problems under the the date of this Notice,
laws of, or the requirements of, any relevant regulatory
such authority to expire at the end of the next Annual
body or stock exchange, any territory, or any matter
General Meeting of the Company or, if earlier, at close of
whatsoever.
business on 5 May 2021, but in each case, prior to its expiry
SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS the Company may make offers, and enter into agreements,
Disapplication of pre-emption rights which would, or might require equity securities to be
20. To authorise the directors, subject to the passing of allotted (and treasury shares to be sold) after the authority
Resolution 19, and in accordance with the power conferred expires and the directors may allot equity securities (and
on the directors by article 13 of the Company’s articles of sell treasury shares) under any such offer or agreement as if
association, to allot equity securities (as defined in the the authority had not expired.
Companies Act 2006) for cash under the authority given by
that Resolution and/or to sell ordinary shares held by the Purchase of own shares
Company as treasury shares for cash as if section 561 of the 22. To generally and unconditionally authorise the Company,
Companies Act 2006 did not apply to any such allotment or pursuant to and in accordance with section 701 of the
sale, such authority to be limited: Companies Act 2006, to make market purchases (within
20.1 to allotments for rights issues and other pre-emptive the meaning of section 693(4) of that Act) of ordinary
issues; and shares of 111⁄20 pence each in the capital of the Company
subject to the following conditions:
20.2 to the allotment of equity securities or sale of treasury
shares (otherwise than under paragraph 20.1 above) 22.1 the maximum aggregate number of ordinary shares
up to a nominal amount of £8,764,971 being not more hereby authorised to be purchased is 158,642,000;
than 5% of the issued ordinary share capital 22.2 the minimum price (excluding expenses) which may
(excluding treasury shares) of the Company as at be paid for each ordinary share is 111⁄20 pence;
25 November 2019, being the last practicable date 22.3 the maximum price (excluding expenses) which may
prior to the publication of this Notice, be paid for each ordinary share in respect of a share
contracted to be purchased on any day, does not
such authority to expire at the end of the next Annual exceed the higher of (1) an amount equal to 105% of
General Meeting of the Company, or, if earlier, at the close the average of the middle market quotations for an
of business on 5 May 2021, but in each case, prior to the ordinary share as derived from the London Stock
expiry the Company may make offers, and enter into Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days
agreements, which would, or might, require equity immediately preceding the day on which the purchase
securities to be allotted (and treasury shares to be sold) is made and (2) the higher of the price of the last
after the authority expires and the directors may allot equity independent trade and the highest current
securities (and sell treasury shares) under any such offer or independent bid for an ordinary share as derived from
agreement as if the authority had not expired. the London Stock Exchange Trading System; and
Alison Yapp The Company’s articles of association require one third of the
Group General Counsel and Company Secretary directors to retire by rotation each year and no director may
serve for more than three years without being re-elected by
16 December 2019 shareholders. However, in accordance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code 2016 (the Code), all the directors will submit
Registered Office: themselves for annual re-election by shareholders.
Compass House
Guildford Street Having conducted an evaluation during the year, it is the view of
Chertsey the Chairman that the performance of each of the directors
Surrey KT16 9BQ continues to be effective and each director demonstrates
Registered in England and Wales No. 4083914 commitment to the role and has sufficient time to meet his or
her commitment to the Company.
Save for issues of shares in respect of various employee share As at 25 November 2019 (being the last practicable date prior to
schemes and any share dividend alternatives, the directors have the publication of this Notice), there were 1,589,736,625 111⁄20
no current plans to utilise the authorities sought by Resolutions pence ordinary shares in issue and 3,301,961 111⁄20 pence
19, 20 and 21, although they consider their renewal appropriate ordinary shares held in treasury for the purpose of satisfying the
in order to retain maximum flexibility to take advantage of Company’s obligations under employee equity incentive
business opportunities as they arise. In addition, and in line with schemes. These treasury shares represent 0.20% of the
best practice, the Company has not issued more than 7.5% of its Company’s issued ordinary share capital. Shares held in treasury
issued share capital on a non-pro rata basis over the last three are not eligible to participate in dividends and do not carry any
years. The limit also applies to shares issued from treasury. A voting rights.
renewal of this authority will be proposed at each subsequent
AGM and the directors confirm their intention to follow best As at 25 November 2019 (being the last practicable date prior to
practice set out in the Principles which provides that usage of the publication of this Notice), there were options to subscribe
this authority in excess of 7.5% of the Company’s issued share for ordinary shares issued by the Company outstanding over
capital in a rolling three year period would not take place without approximately 6,877,673 shares, which represent 0.43% of the
prior consultation with shareholders. Company’s issued ordinary share capital (excluding treasury
shares) at that date. If the authority to purchase the Company’s
RESOLUTION 22 – PURCHASE OF OWN SHARES ordinary shares was exercised in full, these options would
This Resolution authorises the directors to make limited on represent 0.48% of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital
market purchases of the Company’s ordinary shares. The power (excluding treasury shares).
is limited to a maximum of 158,642,000 shares (just under 10%
of the issued ordinary share capital as at 25 November 2019, RESOLUTION 23 – NOTICE OF MEETINGS OTHER THAN
being the last practicable date prior to the publication of this ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS
Notice) and details the minimum and maximum prices that can The Company’s articles of association allow the directors to call
be paid, exclusive of expenses. The authority conferred by this general meetings, other than AGMs, on 14 clear working days’
Resolution will expire at the conclusion of the Company’s next notice. However, under Section 307A of the CA 2006, all general
AGM or 18 months from the passing of this Resolution, meetings must be held on 21 days’ notice, unless shareholders
whichever is the earlier. agree to a shorter notice period, and the Company has met the
requirements for electronic voting under the CA 2006. This
The CA 2006 permits the Company to hold shares repurchased Resolution seeks to renew the authority granted by shareholders
as treasury shares. Treasury shares may be cancelled, sold for at last year’s AGM which preserved the Company’s ability to call
cash or used for the purpose of satisfying the Company’s general meetings, other than AGMs, on 14 clear working days’
obligations in connection with employee equity incentive notice, such authority to be effective until the Company’s next
schemes. The authority to be sought by this Resolution is AGM, when a similar resolution will be proposed. The directors
intended to apply equally to shares to be held by the Company confirm that the shorter notice period would not be used as a
as treasury shares. No dividends will be paid on shares which matter of routine, but only where flexibility is merited by the
are held as treasury shares and no voting rights will be attached business of the meeting and it is thought to be to the advantage
to them. Shares held as treasury shares will normally be used to of shareholders as a whole. An electronic voting facility will
satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Company’s be made available to all shareholders for any meeting held
employee equity incentive schemes. on such notice.
No share repurchases were made during the financial year Resolutions 20 to 23 will be proposed as special resolutions and
ended 30 September 2019 or to the date of this Notice. require that at least three quarters of the votes cast must be in
However, the directors consider it desirable for such general favour of a resolution for it to be passed.
authority to be available in order to maintain an efficient capital
structure whilst at the same time retaining the flexibility to fund
any bolt‑on acquisitions.
Shareholder Information
RS RFU RUGBY STORE
ND’S
H WEBB ELLIS
RT
M MARRIOTT HOTEL NO TAND HOUSE
RLA
S
EA ND
ST
MBE
ST
A
THU
RU
NOR
TRADING
GB
WE AND
ESTATE
E OF
YR
ST
ST
M
OA
DUK
H
UT
D
P SO AND
S T
RS 1 CAR
WH
DEALERSHIP
PALM
ITT
CHUD
ON
ROAD
ERST
WHITTON
TAYBEN
RO
LEIGH
AD
ON R
TALMA
WHITTON
STATION
AVENU
OAD
ROAD
GARDE
WH
ROAD CENTRAL
ERTSEY
NS
A316 CH LONDON/
ITT
TWICKENHAM
RICHMOND
ON
M25 M3
EGERT
STATION
THE WEST
RO
AD
ON RO
AD
Glossary
Certain information included in this Annual Report and Accounts is forward looking and involves risks, assumptions and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward looking statements.
Forward looking statements cover all matters which are not historical facts and include, without limitation, projections relating to
results of operations and financial conditions and the Company’s plans and objectives for future operations, including, without
limitation, discussions of expected future revenues, financing plans, expected expenditures and divestments, risks associated with
changes in economic conditions, the strength of the food and support services markets in the jurisdictions in which the Group
operates, fluctuations in food and other product costs and prices and changes in exchange and interest rates. Forward looking
statements can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology, including terms such as ‘believes’, ‘estimates’, ‘anticipates’,
‘expects’, ‘forecasts’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘projects’, ‘goal’, ‘target’, ‘aim’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’ or ‘should’ or, in each case,
their negative or other variations or comparable terminology. Forward looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are not
guarantees of future performance. All forward looking statements in this Annual Report and Accounts are based upon information
known to the Company on the date of this Annual Report and Accounts. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that any particular
expectation will be met and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which speak only at
their respective dates.
Additionally, forward looking statements regarding past trends or activities should not be taken as a representation that such
trends or activities will continue in the future. Other than in accordance with its legal or regulatory obligations (including under
the UK Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority), the Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Nothing in this Annual Report and Accounts shall exclude any liability under applicable laws that cannot be excluded in accordance
with such laws.