PPCE - 8793 - Unit I - Introduction To Process Planning
PPCE - 8793 - Unit I - Introduction To Process Planning
A selection of starting surfaces and datum surfaces to ensure precise execution of processing operations
simultaneously with a selection of holding fixtures and checking of stability of a part by appropriate
clamping;
A sequence of operation as a function of priorities imposed by accuracy and technological constraints;
A grouping of elementary operations on the same machine so that operation time will be reduced, while
respecting accuracy requirements;
A selection of machines to execute the technological operations, taking into account the number of
workpieces to be produced;
A selection of inspection methods and inspection instruments to guarantee final conformity of component
with functional requirements;
A determination of processing conditions for every elementary operation which enables the computation
of working times and costs in order to carry out an economic evaluation;
Editing of process sheets to be assembled in a comprehensive process planning file which is transferred to
the manufacturing department for execution.
Functional Design
Product
Design
Production Design, Basic Decisions setting
minimum possible costs
Make
Route sheet and operation sheets: Work place and tool designs
Specifications of how to manufacture
To determine, what parts are to be manufactured and, what parts to be purchased from outside.
To prepare the bill of material for all the components to initiate the purchasing of raw materials.
To provide estimates of the cost of tooling and equipment needed to manufacture new products.
Size and form of raw material Improper selection results in, Wastage of material, increased
material handling cost, increased too cost, increased process time
Decision
Selection of Primary Process Data Files
Tables
Determination of Production
Tolerances
Selection of Quality
assurance Method
Time
Time and Cost Module
Standards
Selection of tools, tool holding devices, work holding devices and inspection equipments
Selection of manufacturing conditions (i.e. cutting speed, feed and depth of cut)
Drawing interpretation
The first step in preparing the process plan for any component or product is to consult the engineering
drawings.
The interpretation of the drawing will include assessing the part geometry, dimensions and associated
tolerances, geometric tolerances, surface finish specifications, the material specification and the number of
parts required.
A thorough knowledge of the materials used in manufacturing is essential for effective process planning. This
is because every material has different properties and, based on these, will be more suited to particular
processes than others.
For example, brittle materials are more suited to casting or material removal processes. On the other hand,
they are not well suited for use with forming processes. Also, some materials undergo changes in properties
during processing and therefore due consideration must be given to this fact.
It is the job of the manufacturing engineer to specify the raw material billet form for the component. This will
include the size and any special requirements for the raw materials, for example, heat treatment. Knowledge
of material properties is essential to carry out this task, again because some materials undergo changes in
their properties during processing. For example, during forging a material may undergo dynamic loading and
it is important to know how it will react to this sudden loading. Therefore, it is important to know about the
material's impact resistance or toughness, as it is also known.
Based on the drawing interpretation and the materials evaluation, a shortlist of candidate processes can be
drawn up.
Using some general rules for process selection and criteria such as material form, component size and weight,
economic considerations, dimensional and geometric accuracy, surface finish specification, batch size and
production rate, the shortlist can be evaluated further and a final selection of processes and operations
identified.
Typical factors to be considered in selecting specific production equipment include the component size and
weight, the physical size and construction of the machine, and the power and torque of the machine.
Another factor to be considered is the number and type of tools available for the machine under
consideration. There are various factors that will be considered in selecting an appropriate tool including
work piece material, type of cut, tool material, machining data and quality/capability requirements.
Once the machines and tooling have been selected, specific parameters must be established for each
operation for each machine. These include calculating appropriate feeds, speeds and depth of cut for each
tool for each operation. It is also normal to calculate the time taken for each operation based on the part
geometry and the speeds and feeds employed. Times taken for non-value added tasks, such as setting and
handling, are also established. This enables the total time taken for the job to be compiled.
General-purpose work holders, which include the likes of chucks and collets, and specialist work holders,
which are taken to mean jigs and fixtures. From the drawing interpretation, the process planner identifies any
general location and restraint requirements and any critical location and restraint requirements. The general
requirements will be based on any dimensional and geometric tolerances specified in the drawing, while the
critical requirements will be based on any instances of coupled dimensional and geometric tolerances.
The critical processing factors such as dimensional and geometric tolerances and surface finish specifications
will have been identified during the drawing interpretation. It is the job of the process planner to specify the
inspection criteria for all these critical processing factors as all manufacturing processes have some degree of
inherent variability. In some cases, the process planner might be responsible for specifying the tools and
techniques to be employed to ensure adherence to specification. However, more commonly the inspection
criteria will be passed to a Quality Engineer who decides which tools and techniques are most appropriate.
Costing
The process planner is also tasked with estimating the costs of the process plan. This means estimating the
manufacturing costs of producing a component or product based on the available cost and time data. This will
be used to determine the unit cost and the profitability of the product. Through establishing relationships
between cost and volume, decisions can be made about what material to use, the manufacturing processes to
be used, the batch size to be employed and whether to make or buy a product or component.
Routing Sheets
The routing sheet, as its name suggests, specifies the route the raw material follows through the
manufacturing environment. It usually lists the production equipment and tooling to be used. It is normal
practice for the routing sheet to follow the material through the manufacturing shop floor providing 'travel'
information for the operators.
Operations list
Once the routing of a component has been established, the detailed plan for every operation can be prepared
using an operations list. This specifies in more detail each individual operation. It is usual for an operations
list to be prepared for each workstation listed on the routing sheet, although it may sometimes cover a group
of machines in a work cell. Although the content of an operations sheet will vary from organization to
organization, it will typically include details of tooling (including work holding devices), feeds and speeds,
set-up and operation times.
Miscellaneous documents
In some companies, the total process planning package may include further documentation. For example, the
calculations for the speeds and feeds detailed in the operations list may be detailed in a speeds and feeds
calculation sheet. It can also be the case that further details of the tooling specified in the operations list is
detailed in a tooling list. Finally, it is important to note that in some companies a single process planning
document may be used which is a combination of the routing sheet and the operations list.
From the brief descriptions given above, it can be seen that the process plan provides the complete work
instructions required for the manufacture of a component or product. Consequently, these instructions will
affect the cost, quality and production rate of the component or product.
Traditional Approach
Process planner is involved in process planning activities in three broad stages
1. Looks at the drawing and uses his experience of manufacturing methods, combined with knowledge
of the types of resource available, to decide how the component or assembly should be made. In the
case of a component, the form and size of material to be used will also be decided. It might be the case
that a previously developed plan for a similar part forms the basis of the new plan.
2. For each element of each operation, he refers to manuals to ascertain the company's recommended
tools, feeds and speeds for the particular material on the selected machine. Also using manuals, the
planned times for all the handling and machining elements involved are ascertained. These are then
used to synthesize the set-up time and the time per unit quantity for each operation.
3. All of the above particulars in Step 1 are documented in the process planning layout, also known as a
routing sheet, which lists all the operations. For each operation there is a methods or operations list,
which specifies all the details referred to in Step 2.
Workbook Approach
A derivative of the traditional approach is the workbook approach. This is considered a more efficient
approach to process planning. It involves developing workbooks of pre-determined sequences of
operations for given types of work pieces. After having carried out the drawing interpretation and
identified the manufacturing processes required, the pre-determined sequence of operations can be
selected from the workbook and incorporated into the process plan.
General Guidelines for Manual Process Planning
Although every part will have its own unique process plan, even for complex machined components there
are general guidelines which can be followed when preparing the routing sheet. These include:
Establishing one datum as soon as processing commences and using this as a reference for all
subsequent operations;
Creating as many surfaces as possible at the same setting (i.e. without clamping and unclamping) to
maximize dimensional accuracy;
Avoiding the use of secondary surface data as much as possible;
Precision operations, for example, those producing high-quality surface finishes, should be carried out
last to reduce the possibility of damage;
Inspection operations should be included at appropriate intervals to minimize scrap and rework.
Disadvantages of Manual Process Planning – Excessive Clerical Content, Lack of Consistency in Planning,
Late Design Modifications, Changing Technology
The primary purpose of process planning is to translate the design requirements into manufacturing process
details. This suggests a system in which design information is processed by the process planning system to
generate manufacturing process details.
CAPP integrates and optimizes system performance into the inter-organizational flow. For example, when
one changes the design, it must be able to fall back on CAPP module to generate manufacturing process
and cost estimates for these design changes. Similarly, in case of machine breakdown on the shop floor,
CAPP must generate the alternative actions so that most economical solution can be adopted in the given
situation. A typical CAPP frame-work is shown in Fig. 4.
When compared with manual experience-based process planning, CAPP offers following advantages;
Systematic development of accurate and consistent process plans
Reduction of cost and lead time of process planning
Reduced skill requirements of process planners
Increased productivity of process planners
Higher level application programs such as cost and manufacturing lead time estimation
and work standards can be interfaced
Step „b‟ & „c‟ are repeated as new parts are designed and added to the company‟s design database.
After the preparatory phase is completed, the system is ready for use
Now assume a new component for which the process plan is to be determined, the first step is to
derive the GT Code number for the part. With this code no., a search is made in the part family file
to determine if a standard route sheet exists for the given part code, if a standard route sheet exists
for the part, it is retrieved from the database. Hence the word “Retrieval” for this CAPP System.
The standard process plan is examined to determine whether any modifications are necessary.
Modifications to be made may be minor or major. The user edits the standard plan accordingly.
This ability to edit the standard plan is what gives the retrieval system its alternative name: Variant
CAPP System.
A number of variant process planning schemes have been developed and are in use. One of the
most widely used CAPP system is CAM-I developed by McDonnell-Douglas Automation
Company. This system can be used to generate process plan for rotational, prismatic and sheet-
metal parts
For example, details such as rough and finished states of the parts and process capability of
machine tools to transform these parts to the desired states are provided. Process knowledge in
form of in the form of decision logic and data matches the part geometry requirements with the
manufacturing capabilities using knowledge base. It includes selection of processes, machine
tools, jigs or fixtures, tools, inspection equipments and sequencing operations.
Development of manufacturing knowledge base is backbone of generative CAPP. The tools that
are widely used in development of this database are flow-charts, decision tables, decision trees,
iterative algorithms, concept of unit machined surfaces, pattern recognition techniques and
artificial intelligence techniques such as expert system shells
There are number of difficulties in achieving the goal of complete integration between various
functional areas such as design, manufacturing, process planning and inspection. For example,
each functional area has its own stand-alone relational database and associated database
management system. The software and hardware capabilities among these systems pose
difficulties in full integration. There is a need to develop single database technology to address
these difficulties. Other challenges include automated translation of design dimensions and
tolerances into manufacturing dimensions and tolerances considering process capabilities and
dimensional chains, automatic recognition of features and making CAPP systems affordable to the
small and medium scale manufacturing companies.
Drawing Interpretation
Geometric Tolerances
Limits the shape of a component to certain limits. The symbols for these are illustrated in Table below
Flatness
Straightness
Never uses a Datum
Form
Reference
Circularity
Cylindricity
Perpendicularity
Orientation Angularity
Parallelism
Always uses a Datum
Position
Reference
Location
Concentricity
Circular Runout
Runout
Total Runout
Profile of a Line
Profile May use a Datum Reference
Profile of a Surface
Angularity – Limits the extent to which two surfaces at a stated angle may be out of true between two
parallel planes set a specified distance apart that are true to the required angle and datum.
Concentricity – Limits the extent to which a cylinder axis can vary within a cylinder of a specified diameter
whose axis is in line with the chosen datum axis.
Symmetry – Limits the extent to which the symmetrical axis of two planes is out of true between two
parallel planes set a specified distance apart which are also symmetrical about the central datum axis.
Position (or true position) – Limits the extent to which an axis may deviate from its stated position in three
dimensions to lie within a cylinder of specified diameter whose axis is in the true position.
Examples of Geometric Tolerances
Surface Finish
All manufacturing processes have an inherent ability to produce a range of surface finishes,
sometimes also referred to as surface texture or surface roughness.
Surface finish is defined as the depth of irregularities of a surface resulting from the manufacturing
process used to produce it. The smaller the irregularity, the smoother the surface.
When indicating a surface finish on a drawing, machining symbols are used. A variety of information can be
included with the symbol:
Example
The bearing housing shown in Figure below has to be manufactured and the process planner has been
given the detail drawing for the part. The drawing specifies that the part material is cast iron and the
batch size is 250. The general tolerance is ±0.5 and the general surface finish is N9.
Geometric Analysis – Based on the complexity of the part the most appropriate category of process to
manufacture this part would be casting. In terms of size, the part is relatively small.
Manufacturing Considerations – These are the process parameters stated within the drawing. These are:
The 100 mm diameter bore that holds the bearing cannot deviate from the nominal size by more than
0.02mm;
The 100mm diameter bore must also be perpendicular to the bottom surface within 0.1 mm tolerance zone;
The 150 mm diameter bearing cannot deviate from the nominal size by more than 0.02 mm;
The shaft hole must be machined and have a surface finish of 0.5 μm;
The shaft hole surface and centreline must be parallel to each other to within a tolerance zone of 0.02mm;
The position of the shaft hole centreline cannot deviate from the nominal size by more than 0.01.
The general dimensional tolerance, surface finish specification and batch size must also be taken into
consideration as stated on the drawing. It should be noted that an N9 surface finish is 6.3 μm.
Material Evaluation – The material specified is cast iron. This concurs with the assertion made in the
geometric analysis that a casting would be the most suitable process.
Correlating the above allows the critical process parameters to be formulated. These are essentially a list of
requirements that the initial manufacturing process must meet. In this case, they are as follows:
Suitable for use with cast iron;
Able to meet the general dimensional tolerance of ± 0..5 mm;
Able to meet the general surface finish specification of 6.3 μm;
Able to produce in batches of 250 economically;
Able to meet the majority of the specific dimensional and geometric tolerances stated on the drawing.
Although the process must meet all of these requirements, the final requirement is less critical in this instance
with regards to the selection of the initial process. This is because secondary processing has already been
specified on the drawing, that is, the shaft hole must be machined. Therefore, it is likely that some of the other
specific dimensional and geometric tolerances will also be met through secondary processing.
.MAKE OR BUY DECISION
Quantitative Factors – Cost
Qualitative Factors – Quality, Patents, Skill & Material, Long-Term Considerations
Other Factors – Seasonal Demands, Reliability
1. A company manufactures and sells gas stoves. It makes some of the parts for the gas stove and purchases
other. The engineering department believes it might be possible to cut cost by manufacturing one of the
parts currently being purchased for Rs. 8.50 each. The firm uses 10,000 of these parts every year and the
accounting department gives the following details. Fixed cost will increase by Rs. 50,000, Labour cost will
rise by Rs. 125,000, and Factory over head, currently running Rs 500,000 per year may increase by 12%.
Raw material cost Rs 600,000. Should the company make or buy that component.
Cost Incurred in Manufacturing:
Additional Fixed Cost = Rs 50,000
Additional Labour Cost = Rs 125,000
Raw Material Cost = Rs 600,000
Additional Overhead Cost = Rs 60,000 (0.12 x 500,000)
Total Cost to Manufacture = Rs 835,000
Cost per Part = Rs 835,000 / 100,000
= Rs 8.35
Since, manufacturing cost is less than purchase cost. It is suggested to manufacture the component.
Material Evaluation
The selection of a specific material for a particular part or product is an important part of the design and
manufacture cycle.
Three main categories of materials used in manufacturing – Metals, Polymers & Ceramics
Another two classes of material used in manufacturing – Composites & Semiconductors
Mechanical Properties – Strength, Hardness, Toughness, Ductility, Elasticity, Impact Resistance, Fatigue
Resistance.
Physical Properties – Density, Melting Point, Specific Heat, Thermal Conductivity, Thermal Expansion,
Electrical Conductivity.
Process Selection
The material itself will limit the manufacturing processes that can be used, as not all materials are suitable
for all processes.
Factors common to both the material and process selection decisions:
Number of Components, Size, Weight, Precision required, Surface Finish & Appearance
Manufacturability or Processability – Ability of a material to be worked or shaped into the finished
component. (Weldability, Castability, Formability, Machinability)
Workability has a significant influence on the quality of the product. (Freedom from defects, Surface
Finish, Dimensional Accuracy & Tolerances)
general surface finish characteristics and dimensional accuracy. The use of such processes may
also drastically reduce or even eliminate the need for secondary processes.
Rough machining - After preparing the billet, the next phase is generally to 'rough out' the billet
and form the general shape required. However, the initial machining operations should be used to
provide a datum surface to be used for all subsequent processing. The rough machining will
typically involve machining processes such as rough turning and boring for rotational parts and
routing and rough boring for prismatic parts. These will be used to remove the bulk of material
from the major surfaces of the part in the most efficient manner possible and any minor surfaces.
Finish Machining - The finish machining in this phase is carried out first for major surfaces of the
part. The finish machining will typically involve processes such as finish turning, finish boring and
drilling for rotational parts and milling, finish boring, reaming and drilling for prismatic parts. The
minor surfaces are also finished in this phase. These will include drilling small holes, chamfers,
bosses, countersinking, keyways and cutting threads.
Heat Treatments - In some cases, although not all, heat treatment may be required due to changes
in property that a material may undergo during phases 1-3 of the processing. Numerous heat
treatments may be used for a variety of reasons. Reasons for heat-treating include improvement of
properties such as strength, hardness, ductility, toughness and corrosion resistance.
Finishing Operations - This phase refers to the finishing of major surfaces that require further
refinement in terms of surface finish characteristics. Typical processes employed in this phase are
rough and smooth grinding, fine turning, broaching and finish reaming. Coating and/or cleaning
processes may be employed at this phase if no further finishing is required.
Special Finishing - Special finishing is generally only required where particularly fine surface
finishes are required. Consequently, the typical processes involved here are honing, lapping,
buffing and polishing.
Steps in planning Operation Sequence
Determine the primary areas for locating and gauging.
Setup primary manufacturing operations.
Setup secondary operations and arrange them in order.
Setup and insert necessary allied operations.
Fundamental Principles in planning Operation Sequence
The operation in which largest layer of metal is removed should be performed first.
Thick metal removal reveals casting defects
Releases the internal stresses
Finishing operation should be done at the end of the sequence.
Roughing and finishing should be done on different machine tools.
A surface which is to remain unmachined should be selected as first setting up datum surface.
Inspection stages should be introduced after, Roughing Operation, before operations which are to
be performed in other department, before important operations, after last machining operation.
Surface whose machining will not greatly affect the rigidity of the work should be machined
earlier in the sequence.
Sequence should be coordinated with heat treatment.
Initial requirement
Part Print & Sequence of Operation
Number of components to be produced
Machine capacity data
Machine availability chart & Machine load chart
Factors to be considered
Technical Factors
Physical Size
The machine tool must be of a sufficient size to cope with the dimensions of the workpiece
and be physically able to carry out the desired processing. In addition, the structure of the
machine must be able to cope with the weight of the workpiece.
Surface Finish
Refers specifically to the capability of the machines under consideration to be able to
manufacture parts to the required surface specification. The reasoning behind considering
this factor again is the same as for machine accuracy.
The machine power PM required for each operation can be calculated by multiplying the
cutting force by the cutting speed. (PM = FC x V)
The power required for each operation would have to be calculated to determine the
maximum power required of the machine. For the same conditions, the greater the volume
of material removed per unit time, the greater the power required. Finally, reducing feeds
and speeds and/or the depth of cut can reduce the power required.
Operational Factors
Batch Size
Just as every process has an economic batch quantity (EBQ) that must be achieved before it
can be considered economically viable, so too does specific machinery. A common
approach is to compare different machines for a given batch size using a break-even
analysis to see which is most economic.
Capacity
As equally important as the EBQ is the production rate of the machines under
consideration. All machines are capable of achieving a particular output per unit time.
Therefore, parts must be assigned to machines capable of output that can match the MPS
requirements.
Availability
This can be defined on two levels. The first definition is that of whether the machine
required is already being used or not, that is, is it available or unavailable. However, in
terms of equipment effectiveness, availability can be defined as the proportion of time a
machine is actually available to perform work out of the time it should be available. This, in
turn, relates to the overall efficiency and reliability for the machine.
Power / Force Analysis - After having calculated the power requirements for all operations, those
machines that cannot meet the maximum power requirement can be discounted. The only
exception to this is if there are no other machines available. Similarly, those machines with a far
greater power output than required can also be discounted. This is on the basis that machines with
far greater power than required offer no significant advantage over those closest to the actual
power requirement. The only exception to this is if such a machine has a higher spindle speed
required by one or more operations.
Capability Analysis - The factors considered in the capability analysis are the dimensional and
geometric accuracy and the surface finish required. The machine or machines that are most
suitable should be shortlisted and the remainder considered no further.
Final Selection - Although it is unlikely that there will be more than one machine still being
considered at this stage, a single machine can be selected by selecting the machine with the lowest
machining time. If there is still more than one machine after this, then select the machine with the
lowest time for any operation. The final criteria to be used if still searching for a single machine is
to consider that with the lowest time for the most operations. This selection method, in effect,
considers the machine limitations (physical size, power and force) first and then the machine
capabilities (machine accuracy and surface finish). After this, the economics of the machines
under scrutiny are compared to give a single machine selection.
2. Analysis of machining operations - A specific machine will carry out every operation
required. Each machine tool to be used will have specific tool types to carry out certain
operations. Therefore, this analysis should enable the identification of specific tool types for
specific operations.
4. Tooling analysis - Using the tooling data available, the general tooling specifications
generated at the third stage can be translated into a statement of tooling requirements for the
job, that is, a tooling list. This will obviously reflect whatever tooling is actually available for
the operations required.
5. Selection of tooling - There are two routes that the tool selection can take at this point. If
single-piece tooling is being used, then a suitable tool holder should be selected before fully
defining the tool geometry and material. However, if insert-type tooling is being used then the
following steps should be followed: