De Baat 2021
De Baat 2021
De Baat 2021
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Update in imaging of cancer therapy-
related cardiac toxicity in adults
Esmée C de Baat ,1 Willeke R Naaktgeboren ,2,3 Tim Leiner ,4
Arco J Teske ,5 Jesse Habets ,4,6 Heynric B Grotenhuis 7
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
and nuclear imaging are considered beyond the scope a relative percentage decrease of >15% when compared
of this article. with baseline. Changes of <8% are considered normal
as this concerns inter-variability and intra-variability of
measurements.4 A recent prospective study in adults with
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY lymphoma or leukaemia who were treated with a cumula-
LV systolic function tive anthracyclines dose up to 300 mg/m2, demonstrated
The most widely used method for the evaluation of LV that (2D) GLS >−17.45% at a cumulative anthracycline
function in patients with cancer at risk for CTRCD is dose of >150 mg/m2 is an independent predictor of
assessment of LVEF by two-dimensional (2D) echocardi- future CTRCD, defined as a decrease in the LVEF of
ography.4 The European Society of Cardiology position >10% points to a value <53%.12 Pretreatment measure-
paper from 2016 defined the lower limit of normal of ments of GLS in this cohort were significantly lower in
LVEF as 50%, whereas the American Society of Echocardi- the CTRCD group than in the non-CTRCD group, which
ography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular may suggest an increased baseline risk profile for cardio-
Imaging (EACVI) expert consensus from 2014 defined vascular disease. This finding is supported by the study of
CTRCD as a decrease in LVEF exceeding 10% points, to Ali et al; their results demonstrated that reduced baseline
a value <53%.2 4 However, LVEF measured by 2D echo- GLS was a strong predictor of cardiac events in patients
cardiography is less suited to detect subtle changes in with haematologic cancers. A GLS threshold of −17.5%
systolic function since the variability in LVEF measures before anthracycline therapy would have correctly identi-
can be approximately 10%.6 This may be caused by LV fied 86% of the patients who develop a cardiac event after
geometric assumptions and difficulties in visualising the start of chemotherapy, defined as symptomatic heart
apex. Abnormalities in regional wall displacement can failure or cardiac death.13
also be difficult to detect with 2D echocardiography.4 In In addition, worse basal longitudinal strain after
addition, LVEF is susceptible to volume loading condi- chemotherapy was—in contrast to worse GLS—associ-
tions which may vary significantly during chemotherapy. ated with CTRCD in 61 anthracycline-treated patients.
Changes in LVEF ultimately occur when compensa- Since GLS is the average of all LV segments, it is possible
tory mechanisms fail in the affected myocardium. Recent to underestimate regional impairment, whereas basal
developments in echocardiographic techniques including longitudinal strain may be a more sensitive marker of
myocardial strain by speckle tracking echocardiography CTRCD. However, further research is needed to assess its
(STE) and three- dimensional (3D) echocardiography clinical relevance.14
offer possibilities for more accurate and subclinical Global circumferential strain (GCS) may also be
detection of systolic dysfunction.6 7 Thavendiranathan et predictive for the occurrence of CTRCD. In the study of
al demonstrated that during treatment of patients with Narayan et al, every 1% reduction in GCS compared with
breast cancer with stable cardiac function, estimations of baseline circumferential strain was associated with an OR
LVEF by 3D echocardiography had temporal variability of of 1.21 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.34) for developing CTRCD in
approximately 6%.6 women receiving breast cancer therapy (n=135), inde-
pendent of relevant co-variables such as age, history of
Myocardial deformation cardiovascular risk factors, treatment regimen and time
STE quantifies myocardial deformation by tracking since start of treatment.15
speckle displacement during the cardiac cycle. Strain A novel deformation parameter—area strain (AS)—
is expressed as percentage, which corresponds with the can be obtained with 3D STE. This parameter is calcu-
amount of deformation in a region of interest (ie, short- lated by combining the effects of GLS and GCS, so AS can
ening or lengthening) in respect to the initial length, be considered as parameter that integrates LV myocar-
often measured at the end of diastole. The most eval- dial deformation.16 In 67 patients with breast cancer, the
uated STE parameter is 2D global longitudinal strain mean of global AS (%) deteriorated significantly between
(GLS), which is the average of the strain values in the baseline and after anthracycline therapy (−30.2±4.5 and
longitudinal direction of all 17 segments according to −27.5±5.4, respectively).17
the ASE/EACVI LV segmentation model.8 Recently, 3D
strain measurements are emerging, for which, similar Right ventricular (RV) function
to 3D LVEF assessment, no multiple apical images are Assessment of RV function is considered increasingly
required. important. A recent report in patients with cancer treated
In the last decade, landmark reports demonstrated the with cardiotoxic treatment demonstrated concomitant
additive value of strain assessment after cardiotoxic treat- abnormalities in longitudinal strain of the free RV wall
ments.9–11 These results revealed that early decreases in in 75% of cases (n=20) with LVEF drop >10% to <53%
deformation parameters during or after cancer therapy in (6 months after initiation of chemotherapy).18 Conven-
adults allowed to predict subsequent LVEF deterioration. tional RV functional parameters (ie, tricuspid annular
The ASE/EACVI Expert Consensus therefore strongly plane systolic excursion) were within normal ranges,
supports the use of GLS during follow-up, with a clinically suggesting that this novel RV strain parameter could be
significant deterioration of LV deformation supported by useful as early marker for (sub)clinical RV toxicity. These
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
results should be affirmed in larger studies with a longer LVEF can be the result of an increased left ventricular end
follow-up period. systolic volume (LVESV) or reduction of left ventricular
end diastolic volume (LVEDV). CTRCD is associated
LV mass and diastolic function with an increased LVESV (with a preserved LVEDV)—as
Lipshultz et al demonstrated that both LV thickness– a reflection of reduced myocardial contractility—while
dimension ratio and LV mass were significantly reduced reduced LVEDV can, for example, be observed in patients
in anthracycline- treated childhood cancer survivors.19 who are volume-depleted during chemotherapy.26 Two
However, in adults, early evidence of remodelling may recent studies demonstrated that CTRCD, based on
be reversible as Narayan et al demonstrated increased LV drop in strain or LVEF measurements, was related to an
mass 1 year after anthracycline therapy which normalised isolated decline in LVEDV in 16%–19% of patients, indi-
in the years thereafter.20 cating that in part of the patients with decreased systolic
Reduced LV diastolic function may also occur as part of function, this may be the result of volume depletion.27 30
CTRCD, as reflected by abnormal mitral E velocity, E/A Also important, an increased LVESV due to CTRCD can
ratio, isovolumic relaxation time or tissue Doppler veloci- (partly) be compensated by increased LVEDV as part
ties.4 Anthracycline dose, age at treatment and BMI have of cardiac remodelling, to preserve LVEF and cardiac
been reported as risk factors of diastolic dysfunction.21 22 output. Evaluation of LV dimensions by cardiac MRI
However, the prognostic value of LV diastolic impairment should therefore be an integral part of cardiac evalua-
to predict CTRCD is doubtful because of inconsistent tion, in addition to systolic function parameters.
results regarding its ability to predict subsequent occur- LV mass can also be measured by cardiac MRI with
rence of systolic dysfunction.20 22 23 higher accuracy and reproducibility compared with
echocardiography.31 Neilan et al demonstrated an inverse
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING correlation between decrease in LV mass after chemo-
Cardiac MRI is a non‐invasive imaging technique that therapy and anthracycline dose, and that LV mass index
allows for accurate and reproducible assessment of <57 g/m2 was a predictor of adverse cardiac events.32
biventricular volumes, mass and function with negligible Also, Jordan et al showed a significant association between
inter-observer and intra-observer variability.24 25 Besides worsening of heart failure symptoms and declines in LV
anatomical and functional assessment, cardiac MRI allows mass after accounting for both changes in LVEF and
for myocardial tissue characterisation by use of late gado- changes in body weight.33 This may suggest that remod-
linium enhancement (LGE) and quantitative mapping elling of the LV structure precedes myocardial function
techniques (T1 and T2 mapping).26 impairment. Evaluation and quantification of LV mass by
cardiac MRI is therefore advised in (suspected) CTRCD.
LV function
For the surveillance of oncology patients, cardiac MRI RV function
-derived LVEF is considered as reference standard for LV In addition, cardiac MRI can be used to study RV perfor-
systolic performance.2 24 To detect small changes in LVEF, mance. Several studies have demonstrated significant
assessment with cardiac MRI is well-suited in patients with changes in RV systolic function, structure and dimensions
good health and non-cancer heart failure with a temporal during and after systemic cancer treatment.34–36 Recently,
variability of 2.4%–7.3%.25 a prospective study of patients with breast cancer (n=41)
Recent reports have demonstrated that also cardiac demonstrated a significant decrease in RVEF from 58.3%
MRI-derived LV strain allows detecting subclinical LV (95% CI 57.1% to 59.5%) to 53.9% (95% CI 52.5% to
dysfunction, during and after potentially cardiotoxic 55.4%, p<0.001) and increases in right ventricular end
cancer therapy.27 28 During follow-up of 41 trastuzumab- diastolic volume (RVEDV) and right ventricular end
treated patients, significant reductions in GLS and GCS systolic volume (RVESV) at 6 months after initiation of
were observed at 6 and 12 months when compared with trastuzumab, however, these measurements reversed after
baseline. These alterations were related with concurrent completion of therapy. RVEF and LVEF changed in a
decreases in LVEF.29 To enhance the potential transition similar pattern, but the relationship was non-significant.36
from echocardiographic LV- measurements to cardiac Further studies are required to explore the prognostic
MRI, Jolly et al proposed an automated measurement value of RV evaluation in oncology patients.
of GCS from CMR cine images in patients treated with
chemotherapy. They demonstrated that GCS can be Myocardial tissue characterisation
obtained in ~7 min from routine cine LV short axis images Imaging by cardiac MRI enables visualisation and
in 98.6% of the patients (n=72) and the observed wors- characterisation of myocardial tissue. 37 38 Formation
ening in GCS correlated with LVEF decline on cardiac of fibrosis due to collagen breakdown is one of the
MRI.28 proposed molecular mechanisms of anthracycline-
associated myocardial remodelling. 39 There are several
LV volume cardiac MRI techniques to detect fibrosis, including
Alterations in LV dimensions should always be consid- LGE imaging and mapping parameters. Visualisation
ered when evaluating changes in LVEF, since a decline in of fibrosis with LGE is generally a result of regional
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
differences in signal intensity.37 Since interstitial the difficulty of interpreting mapping measurements
fibrosis as late effect of cancer treatment is likely to be in individual patients.44
diffuse, 24 LGE seems less suitable for the surveillance A landmark study of Jordan et al compared pretreat-
of CTRCD,35–37 40–42 except for the detection of toxic ment (n=37) and post-t reatment patients with cancer
myocarditis or previous cardiac events such as myocar- (n=37) with cancer- f ree controls (n=236), demon-
dial infarcts.40 To detect diffuse myocardial diseases, strating elevated ECV 3 years after anthracycline treat-
specific mapping parameters (T1, T2, T2*) and extra- ment.45 It is important to stress that cardiovascular
cellular volume (ECV) are important cardiac MRI risk factors, often present in patients with cancer,46
techniques that depend on molecular environment in are associated with elevations in ECV. Increase in
a myocardial voxel and quantify intracellular changes ECV in this study was independent of cardiovascular
of the cardiomyocyte and extracellular changes in the risk factors, which corroborates the hypothesis that
myocardial interstitium.37 38 myocardial fibrosis develops after cancer treatment.45
Molecular environment changes may be caused by Accordingly, pretreatment cardiac MRI is crucial
oedema, interstitial fibrosis or other more rare causes to interpret the myocardial tissue characteristics
(ie, cardiac amyloidosis). Increases in T1 and T2 reflected by cardiac MRI. A more recent study indi-
values reflect myocardial fibrosis and oedema, respec- cated that interstitial myocardial fibrosis—reflected
tively. As a result of these processes, the extracellular by elevated ECV—may arise within 3 months after
matrix can expand, expressed by an increased ECV.38 initiation of cardiotoxic chemotherapy (71% received
In a recent pig study, cardiac MRI evaluation over a anthracyclines).47 De Souza et al also suggested that
period of 16 weeks after anthracycline administration decreased cardiomyocyte size may contribute to an
showed that the acute phase of myocardial injury was increase in ECV.48
characterised by prolongation of T2 relaxation time. The online supplemental contains E- figures that
Significant changes in LVEF, ECV and T1 mapping demonstrate the different cardiac MRI parameters in a
occurred only weeks later. T2 relaxation time prolon- case with CTRCD.
gation in the acute phase was correlated with oedema
within the cardiomyocyte. Withholding anthracycline
administration at the time of occurrence of T2 abnor- CLINICAL PRACTICE
malities prevented development of subsequent LV Currently, cardiac follow-u p of patients with increased
systolic dysfunction.43 risk for CTRCD is based on expert consensus. Teske et
Reports of myocardial mapping in oncology patients al provided an overview about the available evidence
are generally mixed in results; myocardial oedema and clinical practice in our institution which will be
after receipt of anthracycline and/or trastuzumab was referred to in the following section.49 Typically, the
demonstrated in almost half of the patients at 1 or surveillance of adult patients with cancer who will
4 months after initiation of therapy, but LV dysfunc- receive cardiotoxic agents starts before initiation of
tion could not be predicted.34 In a 5-y ear follow-u p cancer therapy and ends up to 1 year after last chemo-
study, both LV function and T1 mapping values were therapy dose. The frequency of follow-u p is based on
within the normal limits. 42 Muehlberg et al described the individual risk profile for CTRCD, which incorpo-
different findings with regard to cardiac MRI values rates parameters such as type and dosage of chemo-
in sarcoma patients shortly after anthracycline-based therapy, age at time of chemotherapy and presence of
chemotherapy. Within 48 hours after chemotherapy cardiovascular risk factors.49
initiation, native T1 decreased significantly in patients The results of the recently published studies show
who developed CTRCD (LVEF drop >10% points) at that CTRCD can affect multiple parts of the myocar-
the end of the chemotherapy. T1 values normalised dium and therefore reinforce the recommendation of
in all CTRCD cases after treatment completion and a comprehensive and systematic echocardiographic
myocardial T2 mapping values did not significantly assessment of at least LV systolic and diastolic func-
change during chemotherapy.41 The authors suggest tion, LV strain and RV function. 4 It is important to
that development of CTRCD may consist of different use the same imaging modality over time to enhance
phases and therefore the interpretation of cardiac adequate interpretation of serial measurements and
MRI results after anthracycline therapy may be identification of individual CTRCD.4 Since the accu-
adapted to the timing of assessment.41 racy in LV measurements by 3D echocardiography
In addition, a recent study by Altaha et al demon- has expanded in clinical care, this modality is recom-
strated greater temporal differences in T1, T2 and mended for serial LVEF measurements in patients
ECV in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with with cancer.4 Regarding myocardial strain, a clear
CTRCD (n=10), defined as >10% reduction in LVEF superiority of 3D STE over 2D STE has not been
to <55% or >15% relative reduction in GLS, compared reported yet, although results of 3D-d erived strain are
with patients without CTRCD and healthy participants. promising.16 17
However, the results in patients with CTRCD overlap The use of cardiac MRI is recommended as a comple-
with variability in healthy participants, emphasising mentary tool when echocardiography is inconclusive
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
and when evaluation of other underlying causes of subclinical myocardial changes may precede global
LV dysfunction is indicated. 2 4 Despite the superior LV dysfunction, but it is too early to incorporate these
qualities of cardiac MRI, this modality is (in the Neth- in decision making and warrant therapeutic interven-
erlands) approximately three times more expensive tion. Other novel technical parameters (eg, torsion,
and less available than echocardiography. In our own Tei index) are of potential interest, yet their incre-
institution, CMR is routinely used in case of clin- mental value for clinical purposes has to be explored.
ical CTRCD on transthoracic echocardiography and In addition, more research is needed on diagnostic
considered in case of subclinical CTRCD.49 Further- and risk prediction models that combine echocar-
more, cardiac MRI provides additional diagnostic and diographic measures with other potential predictors
prognostic information in patients with known cardiac such as genetics, cardiovascular risk factors and blood
disease, that is, previous myocardial infarction. biomarkers to improve and individualise cardiac
Heart failure medication is only initiated in adult surveillance and treatment.
patients with evidence of CTRCD, defined as LVEF Myocardial tissue characterisation by cardiac MRI
>10% decline to LVEF <53% or GLS decline of 15% and offers the opportunity to improve follow-up of the
NYHA ≥II/IV or LVEF <45% on echocardiography.49 myocardium over time and, especially in light of the
potential introduction of anti- f ibrosis medication,
may provide important clinical information. There
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
are only few high-quality studies that evaluated early
In the future, strain measurements may replace LVEF
(within 3 months after treatment) effects of cancer
for early detection of CTRCD and its incremental
treatment, so more evidence is needed to elucidate
clinical value needs to be further explored. An
its prognostic value. In the future, diffusion-w eighted
important question remains what the consequences
cardiac MRI images will also be available for the evalu-
are for an asymptomatic patient with reduced strain
ation of the myocardium, which enables evaluation of
and preserved LVEF. The SUCCOUR (Strain sUrveil-
myocyte necrosis during the acute stage and has the
lance of Chemotherapy for improving Cardiovascular
potential to become a new biomarker.
Outcomes) trial is the first (ongoing) randomised
controlled trial in anthracycline-t reated patients with
cancer at risk of heart failure which compares the CONCLUSION
effect of GLS- guided versus LVEF- g uided manage- Imaging techniques that allow for detection of early
ment on 3D LVEF 3 years after diagnosis. 50 changes in myocardial function are crucial in the
Parameters as RV function, LV dimensions and follow-u p of cardiovascular diseases after cardiotoxic
mass, regional function as expressed by basal longi- cancer treatment as exemplified in figure 1. Advanced
tudinal strain, circumferential strain, AS and diastolic imaging techniques may be of additive value due to
measures have shown promising results to suggest that better reproducibility and, even more important, the
Figure 1 Detection of CTRCD using non-invasive imaging. The progress of CTRCD can be subdivided into different phases.
Multiple non-invasive modalities play an important role in order to detect CTRCD as early as possible. Interstitial myocardial
changes including oedema and fibrosis shortly after start of chemotherapy can be reflected by tissue characterisation with
cardiac MRI. Thereafter, changes in myocardial function may occur. Myocardial strain is an important parameter of early to
intermediate cardiac impairment which can be measured by echocardiography and MRI. On the long term, months to years
after start of chemotherapy treatment, asymptomatic left ventricle systolic dysfunction may progress to heart failure so follow-
up based on left ventricular ejection fraction is recommended. CTRCD, cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction; DWI,
diffusion-weighted imaging; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI, magnetic resonance
imaging; MUGA, multigated acquisition scan.
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
introduction of novel parameters appears to improve 5 Cardinale D, Colombo A, Bacchiani G, et al. Early detection of
anthracycline cardiotoxicity and improvement with heart failure
our pathophysiological understanding of CTRCD and therapy. Circulation 2015;131:1981–8.
predict subsequent cardiac outcome. Tissue charac- 6 Thavendiranathan P, Grant AD, Negishi T, et al. Reproducibility
terisation by cardiac MRI and early signs of myocar- of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment
of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: application to
dial dysfunction detected by STE may provide further patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. J Am Coll Cardiol
information about the course of cardiotoxicity. The 2013;61:77–84.
7 Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim K-D, et al. Use of myocardial strain
use of a homogeneous outcome definition (LVEF vs imaging by echocardiography for the early detection of cardiotoxicity
GLS) and clear cut- o ff points are warranted when in patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic
confirming the promising results of advanced imaging review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2751–68.
8 Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac
techniques in larger study populations. chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update
from the American Society of echocardiography and the European
Author affiliations association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc
1 Imaging 2015;16:233–71.
Pediatric Oncology, Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands 9 Hare JL, Brown JK, Leano R, et al. Use of myocardial deformation
2
Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands imaging to detect preclinical myocardial dysfunction before
Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands conventional measures in patients undergoing breast cancer
3
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center treatment with trastuzumab. Am Heart J 2009;158:294–301.
Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands 10 Negishi K, Negishi T, Hare JL, et al. Independent and incremental
4
Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht Imaging Division, Utrecht, The value of deformation indices for prediction of trastuzumab-induced
cardiotoxicity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:493–8.
Netherlands 11 Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC, et al. Assessment of
5
Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands echocardiography and biomarkers for the extended prediction of
6
Radiology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and
7
Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital University Medical Centre, trastuzumab. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:596–603.
Utrecht, The Netherlands 12 Charbonnel C, Convers-Domart R, Rigaudeau S, et al. Assessment
of global longitudinal strain at low-dose anthracycline-based
chemotherapy, for the prediction of subsequent cardiotoxicity. Eur
Contributors ECdB, WRN, JH and HBG wrote the manuscript. TL and AJT were co- Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:jew223–401.
authors who reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final 13 Ali MT, Yucel E, Bouras S, et al. Myocardial strain is associated
version. JH and HBG are shared last authors. with adverse clinical cardiac events in patients treated with
anthracyclines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016;29:522–7.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any 14 Saijo Y, Kusunose K, Okushi Y, et al. Relationship between regional
funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. left ventricular dysfunction and cancer-therapy-related cardiac
Competing interests None declared. dysfunction. Heart 2020;106:1752–8.
15 Narayan HK, French B, Khan AM, et al. Noninvasive measures
Patient consent for publication Not required. of ventricular-arterial coupling and circumferential strain predict
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. cancer Therapeutics-Related cardiac dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc
Imaging 2016;9:1131–41.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work. 16 Muraru D, Niero A, Rodriguez-Zanella H, et al. Three-dimensional
speckle-tracking echocardiography: benefits and limitations of
Open access This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the integrating myocardial mechanics with three-dimensional imaging.
Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018;8:101–17.
permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, 17 Santoro C, Arpino G, Esposito R, et al. 2D and 3D strain for
and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is detection of subclinical anthracycline cardiotoxicity in breast cancer
properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use patients: a balance with feasibility. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b y-nc/4.0/. 2017;18:930–6.
18 Cherata DA, Donoiu I, Diaconu R, et al. Longitudinal strain analysis
ORCID iDs allows the identification of subclinical deterioration of right
Esmée C de Baat http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2 694-8783 ventricular function in patients with cancer therapy-related left
ventricular dysfunction. Discoveries 2019;7:e94.
Willeke R Naaktgeboren http://o rcid.org/0 000-0002-5 767-7042
19 Lipshultz SE, Lipsitz SR, Sallan SE, et al. Chronic progressive
Tim Leiner http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-5499 cardiac dysfunction years after doxorubicin therapy for childhood
Arco J Teske http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5 305-1619 acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2629–36.
Jesse Habets http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-2484 20 Narayan HK, Finkelman B, French B, et al. Detailed
Heynric B Grotenhuis http://orcid.org/0 000-0002-9625-5969 echocardiographic phenotyping in breast cancer patients:
associations with ejection fraction decline, recovery, and
heart failure symptoms over 3 years of follow-up. Circulation
2017;135:1397–412.
REFERENCES 21 Serrano JM, González I, Del Castillo S, et al. Diastolic dysfunction
1 Heymach J, Krilov L, Alberg A, et al. Clinical cancer advances 2018: following anthracycline-based chemotherapy in breast cancer
annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society patients: incidence and predictors. Oncologist 2015;20:864–72.
of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:1020–44. 22 Dorup I, Levitt G, Sullivan I, et al. Prospective longitudinal
2 Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Rodriguez Muñoz D, et al. 2016 ESC assessment of late anthracycline cardiotoxicity after childhood
Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity cancer: the role of diastolic function. Heart 2004;90:1214–6.
developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice 23 Stoddard MF, Seeger J, Liddell NE, et al. Prolongation
Guidelines: The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular of isovolumetric relaxation time as assessed by Doppler
toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J echocardiography predicts doxorubicin-induced systolic dysfunction
2016;37:2768–801. in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:62–9.
3 Chang H-M, Moudgil R, Scarabelli T, et al. Cardiovascular 24 Thavendiranathan P, Wintersperger BJ, Flamm SD, et al. Cardiac
Complications of Cancer Therapy: Best Practices in Diagnosis, MRI in the assessment of cardiac injury and toxicity from cancer
Prevention, and Management: Part 1. J Am Coll Cardiol chemotherapy: a systematic review. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging
2017;70:2536–51. 2013;6:1080–91.
4 Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A, et al. Expert consensus for 25 Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JCC, et al. Comparison of interstudy
multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-
after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients
Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol
Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:1063–93. 2002;90:29–34.
Open Heart: first published as 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001506 on 16 April 2021. Downloaded from http://openheart.bmj.com/ on September 17, 2022 by guest. Protected by copyright.
26 Jordan JH, Todd RM, Vasu S, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement
in the oncology patient. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1150–72. by the Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR)
27 Jordan JH, Sukpraphrute B, Meléndez GC, et al. Early myocardial endorsed by the European association for cardiovascular imaging
strain changes during potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapy may (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017;19:75.
occur as a result of reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic 39 Nguyen K-L, Hu P, Ennis DB, et al. Cardiac MRI: a translational
volume: the need to interpret left ventricular strain with volumes. imaging tool for characterizing anthracycline-induced myocardial
Circulation 2017;135:2575–7. remodeling. Curr Oncol Rep 2016;18:48.
28 Jolly M-P, Jordan JH, Meléndez GC, et al. Automated assessments 40 Fallah-Rad N, Lytwyn M, Fang T, et al. Delayed contrast
of circumferential strain from cine CMR correlate with LVEF declines enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in trastuzumab
in cancer patients early after receipt of cardio-toxic chemotherapy. J induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008;10:5.
Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2017;19:59.
41 Muehlberg F, Funk S, Zange L, et al. Native myocardial T1 time
29 Ong G, Brezden-Masley C, Dhir V, et al. Myocardial strain imaging by
can predict development of subsequent anthracycline-induced
cardiac magnetic resonance for detection of subclinical myocardial
cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Fail 2018;5:620–9.
dysfunction in breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab and
chemotherapy. Int J Cardiol 2018;261:228–33. 42 Kimball A, Patil S, Koczwara B, et al. Late characterisation of cardiac
30 Meléndez GC, Sukpraphrute B, D'Agostino RB, et al. Frequency of effects following anthracycline and trastuzumab treatment in breast
left ventricular End-Diastolic Volume-Mediated declines in ejection cancer patients. Int J Cardiol 2018;261:159–61.
fraction in patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic cancer treatment. 43 Galán-Arriola C, Lobo M, Vílchez-Tschischke JP, et al. Serial
Am J Cardiol 2017;119:1637–42. Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Early Stages of
31 Armstrong AC, Gidding S, Gjesdal O, et al. Lv mass assessed by Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity. J Am Coll Cardiol
echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical 2019;73:779–91.
practice. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:837–48. 44 Altaha MA, Nolan M, Marwick TH, et al. Can quantitative CMR
32 Neilan TG, Coelho-Filho OR, Pena-Herrera D, et al. Left ventricular tissue characterization adequately identify cardiotoxicity during
mass in patients with a cardiomyopathy after treatment with chemotherapy?: impact of temporal and observer variability. JACC
anthracyclines. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:1679–86. Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:951–62.
33 Jordan JH, Castellino SM, Meléndez GC, et al. Left ventricular 45 Jordan JH, Vasu S, Morgan TM, et al. Anthracycline-associated T1
mass change after anthracycline chemotherapy. Circ Heart Fail mapping characteristics are elevated independent of the presence
2018;11:e004560. of cardiovascular comorbidities in cancer survivors. Circ Cardiovasc
34 Grover S, Leong DP, Chakrabarty A, et al. Left and right ventricular Imaging 2016;9.
effects of anthracycline and trastuzumab chemotherapy: a 46 Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, et al. Shared risk factors in
prospective study using novel cardiac imaging and biochemical cardiovascular disease and cancer. Circulation 2016;133:1104–14.
markers. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:5465–7. 47 Meléndez GC, Jordan JH, D'Agostino RB, et al. Progressive
35 Ylänen K, Poutanen T, Savikurki-Heikkilä P, et al. Cardiac 3-Month Increase in LV Myocardial ECV After Anthracycline-Based
magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the late effects of
Chemotherapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:708–9.
anthracyclines among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. J Am
48 Ferreira de Souza T, Quinaglia A C Silva T, Osorio Costa F, et al.
Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1539–47.
Anthracycline therapy is associated with cardiomyocyte atrophy
36 Barthur A, Brezden-Masley C, Connelly KA, et al. Longitudinal
assessment of right ventricular structure and function by and preclinical manifestations of heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc
cardiovascular magnetic resonance in breast cancer patients treated Imaging 2018;11:1045–55.
with trastuzumab: a prospective observational study. J Cardiovasc 49 Teske AJ, Linschoten M, Kamphuis JAM, et al. Cardio-oncology: an
Magn Reson 2017;19:44. overview on outpatient management and future developments. Neth
37 Mewton N, Liu CY, Croisille P, et al. Assessment of myocardial Heart J 2018;26:521–32.
fibrosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 50 Negishi T, Thavendiranathan P, Negishi K, et al. Rationale and
2011;57:891–903. design of the strain surveillance of chemotherapy for improving
38 Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical cardiovascular outcomes: the SUCCOUR trial. JACC Cardiovasc
recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping Imaging 2018;11:1098–105.