Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: A

Physics and Space Science

Volume 19 Issue 1 Version 1.0 Year 2019
Type : Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal
Publisher: Global Journals
Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896

Newton's Coulomb Laws

By Ordin S. V.
Ioffe Institute RAS
Abstract- On the example of the gravitational and electrostatic fields, the distribution of any
equipotentials in with a uniform and accelerated particle motion is analyzed. It is shown that
inertia is determined by the distortion of equipotentials. It is also shown that Einstein corrections
to the mass and energy of a particle at about light speeds are also determined by the distortion
of the equipotentials due to the delay time of the interaction of the particle with equipotentials.
Potential waves, transverse with respect to the amplitude of the potential oscillations and
longitudinal with respect to the amplitude, oscillations of force, which describe “gravitational
waves” without any convolutions of space-time, are incomprehensible. The conclusion is made
about the general character of Newton's laws for any potential fields, which makes it possible to
combine methods of measuring gravitational and electric fields. A unified approach to the
calculation of centrifugal and magnetic forces showed weakness / incompleteness of their
definitions, which led to the emergence of a number of "theoretical" disasters.
GJSFR-A Classification: FOR Code: 020399p

NewtonsCoulombLaws

Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of:

© 2019. Ordin S. V. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
 Newton's Coulomb Laws
Ordin S.V.

Abstract- On the example of the gravitational and electrostatic consistent solutions only in the ten-dimensional space,
fields, the distribution of any equipotentials in with a uniform whereas for the convolution and our geometric three-
and accelerated particle motion is analyzed. It is shown that dimensional space, we have not yet found the fourth
inertia is determined by the distortion of equipotentials. It is dimension. Therefore, cumbersome but illiterate
also shown that Einstein corrections to the mass and energy of
experiments are being made and speculate on their
a particle at about light speeds are also determined by the
results.

2019
distortion of the equipotentials due to the delay time of the
interaction of the particle with equipotentials. Potential waves, Attempts to eliminate internal contradictions in
physics, I began with an analysis of the intersections of

Year
transverse with respect to the amplitude of the potential
oscillations and longitudinal with respect to the amplitude, the phenomenologies of dispersed branches of physics,
oscillations of force, which describe “gravitational waves” describing, in principle, the same, or similar
without any convolutions of space-time, are incomprehensible. 1
145
phenomena. But after correcting and generalizing some
The conclusion is made about the general character of phenomenologies[4-11], it came to the conclusion that

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Newton's laws for any potential fields, which makes it possible Quantum Mechanics is built on a special case - based
to combine methods of measuring gravitational and electric
on primitive solutions of the Schrödinger equation,
fields. A unified approach to the calculation of centrifugal and
magnetic forces showed weakness / incompleteness of their
which, in principle, are not elementary for atoms more
definitions, which led to the emergence of a number of complicated than hydrogen[12]. And Einstein's formula:
"theoretical" disasters. “Some equations of the classical mechanic allow
rewriting in the quantum-mechanical form” showed the
I. Introduction need to return to the basic classical models. In this

T
regard, the gigantic distinction between gravitational
he gravitational and electrostatic fields are
and electric forces is an excellent tool for analyzing
canonical potential fields and, accordingly, have
various sides, in principle, strictly mathematically similar
many strictly mathematically proved identical
phenomena.
solutions[1]. But because of the huge difference of
forces, or rather, the ratios of gravitational and electric II. Gravity-Charge Analogy and
forces used for physical theories, the solutions are
Potential Waves
different[2]. And when they are trying to build a Unified
Field Theory, they are trying, in principle, to combine the In the simplest geometric case (and in vacuum),
almost incompatible - from two magnificent buildings to the force of interaction between the masses m1, 2(Fig. 1)
build a new, whole. But the transitions do not match, is described by the universal gravitation law (1)
and sometimes the floors. So, in practice, this Single
Construction has been reduced to over-tightening the
rope. And it began this pulling, one might say, with
Heviside's Electromagnetic Theory of Gravity. But then
they dragged the rope in the direction of Einstein's
Theory of Relativity. And then, adding quantum theory to
electrodynamics, they began to try to incorporate the
Theory of Relativity into Quantum Electrodynamics.
But in the foundations of basic physical models,
there are many assumptions that are not rarely
erroneous[3]. At the beginning of the last century, at the
dawn of building the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Рис.1.
Theory, the basic models were actively discussed, but
then were canonized. And their further development was m1m2
F= G ⋅ , (1)
reduced only to more complex calculations, which, r2
taking into account the assumptions, led to the m
fragmentation of all physics, and in theoretical physics where G = k = 6,67408·10−11 m ³ / (kg · s²)
to singularities, wormholes and particles of God. The =6,67408·10−8 cm3 g−1s−2 - gravity constant (an
fact is that the Unified Field Theory has a few self- inclination constant, according to Newton).
The Coulomb's law has a similar form,
Author: IoffeInstitute RAS. e-mail: [email protected] describing the force of interaction between charges q1, 2

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

q1q2 1 quadratic decrease in the “density of static force” in

F= k q ⋅ ,гдевСИ k
q
= , (2) both laws, corresponding to an increase in the surface
r2 4πε 0 of a sphere in three-dimensional space as its radius
increases. The giant, by 42 orders of magnitude, the
where ε 0 ≅ 8,85418781762·10−12 F ⋅ m −1 ( C / (V ⋅ m ) ) - difference of these forces in absolute value, and the
vacuum permittivity. existence of two (accessible to measurements) charge
Proportionality coefficients in both laws are marks led not only to different methods of measuring
scaling ratios of different forces - reductions of both them, but also to theoretical isolation. Although the type
forces to usual to us to gravity force. of law itself indicates that they describe the power of the
Usually, the analogy of these laws is associated DIRECT (non-cross) interaction between EQUIVALENT
only with their similar spatial distribution, with a particle measures µ .
2019

µ1µ2
F = kµ ⋅ = k µ ⋅ Fµ = kµ ⋅ aµ1 ⋅ µ2
Year

(3)
r2
1
146
where k µ - a scaling ratio in force size, usual for us (now The second Newton's laws - the differential law
of the movement describing interrelation between force
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

newton).
applied to a material point and the acceleration of this
At the same time for all similar measures
point which is turning out from it. Actually, the second
around a particle there is a field of their forces of direct
Newton's laws enters the weight as a measure of
interaction which can be measured by a trial particle
manifestation of inertness of a material point in the
with a unit measure and which can compare the
chosen inertial frame of reference (IFR).
potential field determined by integration of force from
infinity to the coordinate particle r
set relatively
The mass of a material point in this case is
assumed to be constant in time and independent of any
features of its movement and interaction with other
µ
ϕµ = kµ , (4)
bodies.
r Or
In the inertial frame of reference, the
And on the example of Newton's laws it is easy acceleration that a material point with a constant mass
to see that there is a number of the general, the potential receives is directly proportional to the resultant of all
fields of the patterns which are not considered forces applied to it and inversely proportional to its
determined by existence neither for the charging field, mass.
nor for gravitational (for various reasons, but first of all, In these first two laws of Newton, inertia is
for the reasons determined by the different scale of presented as a given, without any attempt to describe its
forces). nature. But having said “A” that inertia is a manifestation
And so, Newton's first law without "noise". of external forces, they somehow did not dare to
Inertia (as believed, solely for the masses). pronounce “B”, which follows from the third law and the
Newton's first law postulates the existence of complementary concept of the first two. They did not
inertial reference systems. Therefore, it is also known as dare because the subconsciously considered the field
the law of inertia. Inertia (it is inertia) is the property of to be unreal, as if arising when a test particle was
the body to maintain the speed of its movement introduced into it.
unchanged in magnitude and direction when no forces Without going into casuistry of the type, whether
act, and also the property of the body to resist a change there is a mountain, if a person has not “stepped in” on
in its speed. To change the speed of the body, it is it, we simply accept as a given that the force of the
necessary to apply some force, and the result of the particle’s action (through the field) is equal to the force
action of the same force on different bodies will be of its own field’s opposition to it. Even the absence of
different: the bodies have different inertia (inertness), the the “Mountain” in the way of the waves excited by us in
magnitude of which is characterized by their mass. the medium does not cancel the necessity of applying
Or, modern wording force to the wave generator and the transfer of energy
There are such reference systems, called (waves) by this generator.
inertial, with respect to which the material points, when Only, at the same time, you should try not to
no forces act on them (or mutually balanced forces act), allow twice taking into account the same impact - a
are in a state of rest or uniform rectilinear motion. member of the equation, as was often the case, for
And the second Newton's laws (also believe example, when calculating the potential Schottky barrier
only for masses) on the border of two media or in the Ioffe thermoelectric

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

model, accounting for twice the same heat flux in Then it is easy to show that when the Einstein
thermal conductivity and in a change in entropy. finiteness is taken into account, the speed of
The denial of the materiality of a field is based transmission of the inertia effect is directly related to the
on the denial of the Theory of Ether. But the recognition particle field.
of the materiality of the field itself denies the primeval And so, in these first Newton laws, inertia is
Ether - there is simply no “empty” vacuum not filled with simply postulated as a reality, but without any attempt to
the gravitational potential, but simply the presence or describe its nature. Whereas it is not difficult to
absence of particles in it. Moreover, the denial of the demonstrate how this property of a particle is directly
materiality of a field is simply a TABU for a deeper study related to the field of a particle.
of Nature, a ban on the existence, in particular, of the If we construct equidistant equipotentials (Fig.
substructure of the field. Such a “prohibition” is akin to a 2, left), then when a particle moves at a constant speed,
ban on the existence of irrational numbers, without the equipotentials of its field do not distort (Fig. 2, right)

2019
which, as it has been strictly mathematically proved, the (at least, such distortion has not yet been registered).
number axis is not complete.

Year
1
147

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Fig. 2: Instant picture of the original equipotentials (left) and the imposition on them horizontally shifted to the right by
ten distances between the equipotentials (right)
A more detailed transformation of equipotentials
when a particle moves at low speeds is shown in Fig. 3
(the pictures depend on the angle of view on the
drawing plane).

© 2019 Global Journals

 2019
Year Newton's Coulomb Laws

1
148
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Fig. 3: Instant picture of the original equipotentials and the equipotentials horizontally shifted to the right
superimposed on them: on the fraction of the step between the equipotentials (on the left) and the total steps (on the
right)
On the other hand, when a particle moves with interaction of a particle with its own field gives a picture
acceleration, on the contrary, there is no reason to of the displacement of equipotentials, shown in Fig. 4,
assume that the change in the entire (to infinity) where it can be seen that after a fixed time interval, the
stationary field occurs instantaneously. Taking into further the equipotential is located from the particle, the
account the finiteness of the transmission rate of the less it is shifted.

Fig. 4: The displacement of equipotentials with a horizontal displacement of the center of the particle to the right by
one step, taking into account the delay time, the corresponding transmission of the interaction with the finite velocity
through the time interval corresponding to the passage of ten steps

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

Assuming the charge and coefficient of with impulse bias

proportionality equal to one, it is possible to calculate 1 1
the spatial distribution of the potential in relative units , (6)
 r   r 
when the particle is displaced by two steps (Fig. 5): r − 2 1 −  r + 2 1 − 
at stationary displacement without lag time  10   10 
and with its harmonic oscillation
1 1
, (5) 1 (7)
r−2 r+2  r 
r + 2 cos  2π 
taking into account the delay time shown in Fig.4  10 

2019
Year
1
149

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Fig. 5: The change in the spatial distribution of the potential during displacement / oscillation of a particle by two
steps between equipotentials
The waves shown in Fig. 5 are potential and plasma, in the form of longitudinal waves, fluctuations in
transverse with respect to their direction of propagation the concentration of free electrons, and in polar crystals
and amplitude of the potential oscillation. But in relation in the form of longitudinal polaritons — displacements of
to force, they are longitudinal and not alternating, as are charges localized on ions. And these effects can be
usual for us, transverse electromagnetic waves, the links used to register longitudinal Coulomb waves in a
with which we touch in the second paragraph. These vacuum, along with the charge of the nano-layer inside
potential waves, in fact, are similar to potential waves on the sphere described in the article “Electrostatic
the surface of the water, which, taking into account the propulsion 2” [14].
principle of logarithmic relativity [13], will make it Recently identified with the help of an
possible to look into the substructure of the field in the interferometer as gravitational waves specifically for
third paragraph. vacuum, it is also possible to easily associate these
So. longitudinal waves. But it requires the correct
Summarizing the first law of Newton, one can formulation of the experiment. Orientation of one axis of
say: if the potential field of a particle (even the mass, the interferometer vertically, even with a small length of
even the charge) is not distorted, then it moves it, will give a multiple increase in sensitivity. And most
uniformly at any speed. importantly, increasing the accuracy of interpretation
Summarizing Newton's second law, we can say: without any convolutions of space-time[15].
if a particle's own field is distorted, then it (at least mass,
even charge) gets acceleration proportional to the
III. Transverse Gravitational and Charge
applied force and inversely proportional to the local Effects
measure of the particle (mass or charge). The modern, in my opinion, one-sided
And finally, the obtained longitudinal waves are interpretation of the Theory of Relativity has led to some
for vacuum. opposition of gravitational and charge effects. This was
And for a medium, similar longitudinal Coulomb the reason for ignoring the Heaviside Electromagnetic
waves, in principle, have long been investigated — in Gravitational Theory. But I only remind you of this
© 2019 Global Journals
 Newton's Coulomb Laws

mathematical attempt of the Heaviside Single and charge effects. And Einstein's statement also led to
Description, but I will not engage in the analysis of this the consideration of a concrete framework with a current
mathematical mind game, since physics is either built from one electron: "Some equations of classical
on invariants of reality, or they are isolated from reality. A mechanics can be rewritten in a canting-mechanical
charge and mass are independent characteristics of form." And when the analysis of C & BN [10] led to the
matter, and not different in indirect evidence. Here is an need to revise the atomic orbitals [11], and as a result,
indirect, in my opinion, erroneously attributed difference the revision of the Schrödinger equation [12], we had to
between charge and mass, which modern theories give return to the revision of the classical equations that
out as a matter of principle, and then they are fighting Schrödinger wrote in an operator form (not without the
over its resolution, and I will try to eliminate it. help of Heaviside, who introduced the operators and
A fundamental difference is that the vector analysis).
conservation law only works for charge. And for the So. The standard charge approach allows us to
2019

masses of his allegedly, on the basis of the law of estimate the transverse (magnetic) force acting on a
conservation of energy, abolished the Theory of single electron in a circular orbit. For a sufficiently
Year

Relativity. But the law of conservation of mass does not accurate approximation, this force can be calculated as
contradict the law of conservation of energy, if the a force acting on the side of a square frame describing
1 energy associated with the Einstein additive to the mass
150 a circular orbit (Fig. 6).
at a speed close to the speed of light is associated with
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

the same compression / discharge equipotentials

shown in the first paragraph when the particle is
accelerated. When a particle is accelerated, this
compression directly follows, as was shown above, from
the definition of inertia as an external influence on a
particle of its own field. The compression of the medium
and the excitation of waves in it when approaching the
maximum transmission speed of exposure in the
medium are also well known for environments with
acoustic waves (sound barrier) and for the movement of
ultrafast particles in the medium (the Vavilov-Cherenkov
effect). So, the noted difference between gravitational
effects and charge effects is not fundamental, but their
description is repelled by different experiments and
experimental conditions due to the gigantic quantitative
difference of gravitational and Coulomb forces.
Considering this gigantic, but quantitative difference,
you need to build for your transverse effects your
“Planck function” (which eliminated both your
“ultraviolet” and your “infrared” catastrophes).
And so, in physics and in engineering, it has
long been the norm to use transverse electromagnetic Fig. 6: The circular orbit of an electron and its equivalent
waves, but when they are emitted, even from wires, on frame with current
long waves, even from dipoles, in the form of light, far
To do this, we use the formula for the force
exceeding their electrostatic fields are fully
compensated (at sufficient distances ). On the other (called a magnetic) F pushing the wire at the counter
I
hand, these transverse electric fields are generated by a currents in them. If the current is formed by one
giant Coulomb and, although weaker than it, by many electron, then the formula for the current of one electron
orders of magnitude, but not by 42 orders of magnitude, F takes the following form:
i
like gravitational. And in order to observe gravitational
transverse fields, at least in similar electromagnetic
conditions, for experiments we would need a dipole of
neutral particles and antiparticles, compressed by an
additional force, which compensates for their repulsion.
In the absence of this, two approaches to the
description of transverse effects arose.
Considering the real experimental accessibility,
it is required to analyze the differences of gravitational

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

2
µ I2 µ i2 µ e µ  e 
2

FI = 0 ⋅ l → Fi = 0 ⋅ 2r = 0 ⋅   = 0 ⋅ 
4π d 4π 2r 4π  T  4π  2π r v 
2
 e   v  e
2 2
1 1
µ 0ε 0 = c −2
→ Fi = ⋅
2   = ⋅  ⋅ (7)
4πε 0 c  2π r v  4πε 0  2π c  r
2

Strictly integrating projections from forces current Fi force can be obtained if a positive charge is
directed along arbitrary chords gives, of course, only an placed in the center of the orbit, which is equal in
insignificant numerical correction. Therefore, a magnitude to the electron:
e
qualitative relationship between the electrostatic FC and

2019
 v   1 e2   v 
2 2

Year
e e
Fi 
=  ⋅ ⋅ 2=
   ⋅ FC << FC (8)
 2π c   4πε 0 r   2π c 
1
151
It should be immediately noted that the original roughly, on the basis of a primitive model of the

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

formula for current (magnetic) force was obtained for hydrogen atom. I tried to connect this centrosymmetric
macroscopic objects. Therefore, it strictly describes the force with the empirical dependence of energy on
ratio of magnetic and electrostatic forces for
distance 1 [12]. And it is this additional force that
macroscopics. At the same time, with the drift (current) r5
velocities of electrons in the metal, fractions of cm / sec determines the average minimum potential in a sphere
are weaker than the Coulomb forces of about 23 orders of a certain radius, and the symmetry of the distribution
of magnitude, but at the same time, almost 20 orders of of local minima over the sphere is determined by the
magnitude greater than the gravitational ones. number of external electrons. The dependence of the
Therefore, we can with a small magnet resist its potential energy 1 5 , in principle, does not contradict
gravitational attraction by the whole Earth. But this does r
the three-dimensionality of the geometric space, but
not mean that the original formula works strictly on a
allows for additional independent measurements in the
microscopic scale. However, it is also used on a
space of subparticles that form the field.
microscopic scale in electrodynamics. Whereas, as can
The standard gravitational approach, of course,
be seen from formula 8, for any speed of motion of a
also developed for macroscopic conditions, but
charged particle in orbit, the centrifugal magnetic force
different, makes it possible, on the basis of formula 3, to
will be less than the centripetal Coulomb. So, in addition
calculate the centrifugal force of not only the mass, but
to this force, it is necessary to take into account the e
also the charge of an electron Fcentrifugal . And this
presence on the micro scale of an additional force that
repels the electron from the proton (otherwise the centrifugal force can also be compared, when a positron
electron will fall on the nucleus). is placed in the center of the orbit, with a centripetal
This repulsive force was tied up with energy Coulomb force FCe .
quanta, obtained from the Schrödinger equation, tied

(9)

Formally, you can get your own "cosmic these velocity formulas are obtained for “particles” with
velocity" of an electron, rotating equivalent to it in the a very large mass difference (by several orders of
absolute value of a positive charge, say, around the magnitude). And for equal measures with radii less than
∗
positron: critical r , the centripetal force exceeds the centrifugal.
And, on the contrary, when the radius of the orbit is
1 e greater than the critical one, the centrifugal force
v1 = ⋅ , v2 = 2v1 , (10)
4πε 0 r exceeds the centripetal force (Fig. 7).

As can be seen from the formula 10, these e

r∗ = (11)
speeds are higher, the smaller! radius of the orbit. But v2

© 2019 Global Journals

 2019
Year Newton's Coulomb Laws

1
152
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Fig. 7: Dependence of centrifugal and centripetal forces on the reduced radius

The presented elementary dependence of the
critical radius is similar to the formula for the stability of a
molecule or even a crystal, which, as is well known, falls
apart at high speeds / temperatures. This indicates that
the magnetic force (formula 8) at the microscopic level
does not fully take into account centrifugal effects.
Although, on the atomic scale, as noted above, the
force inversely proportional to the first degree of the
electron orbit radius is not enough for the stability of the
electron orbit.
And, on the other hand, it is well known from the
theory of gravity, for macroscopic mass and radius, that
for equal small masses, their attraction is not enough to
counteract this centrifugal force. The rotation of any ball
around the equivalent will stretch the spring even at low
speeds. Since if there are approximately flying stars that
do not fly apart or rotate relative to each other, it would
seem that it would be possible to assume that
deviations about this formula for centrifugal force are
possible only for very large masses. But integrating the
centripetal force to infinity gives divergence for any
masses. Therefore, to calculate the total potential of
charges, we used the constraint at the level of 100
effective radii (Fig.8)

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

2019
Year
1
153

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

Fig. 8: Dependencies of centripetal, centrifugal and total potential on the reduced radius
The total potential presented in Fig. 8 for both
there must be a type factor 1 ±
m that degenerates into
masses and charges qualitatively demonstrates a point M
of unstable equilibrium with a distance between particles a unit with a large difference in mass(measures) and a
equal to the critical radius. But because of the potential
v
used for the integration of a finite interval, this potential “magnetic” factor .
also contains the final support. The tendency of this c
support to infinity with increasing integration interval But most importantly, the divergence is
directly indicates that the centrifugal acceleration removed only for the force falling faster than the first
(formula 9) used is valid only where it is used: the degree
satellite orbit radius does not exceed the Earth's radius ∞
much. And for the rotation of stars relative to each other, 1 1
and for scattering of galaxies, especially, this formula is ∫ x
x1+∆
d x =
∆ ⋅ x∆
(12)
in principle not applicable. So no relativistic corrections
will fix it, will not eliminate the divergence at infinity. And So even a simple geometric mean centrifugal
in general, not only for electrons in a crystal, but also for and magnetic force removes a number of contradictions
astronomical gravitational effects, it is necessary to take both in the theory of gravity and in electrodynamics.
into account the potential formed by the environment
(including an infinite medium). So it is likely that the v
stars, as well as the planets of our solar system, rotate = F⊥e e
Fcentrifugal ⋅ FCe (13)
in a gravitational potential well created by the space
2 π c
around us. And so, the formulas for the transverse
However, the influence of an unaccounted "centrifugal" forces used by charge and mass differ
potential (and possibly an unaccounted particle radically (functionally).But this does not mean the
measure) does not negate the fact that the gravitational fundamental difference between the gravitational and
formula contains an error, and the magnetic component charge fields. This functional difference simply reflects
confirms this additionally. In a more accurate formula, the fact that in both traditional approaches we take into

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

account only different parts / sides of the transverse V. Substructure Fields

effect. The principal difference is the scale difference
between forces and distances, which can be seen from "Justification" of Coulomb's law by quantum
a comparison of these forces simply with the Coulomb electrodynamics using virtual photons (sometimes they
one when placed in the center of the positron orbit. So are said to be bosons, but they all mean the same
the situation with the difference of gravitational and photons that are Bose particles) seems to me logically
charge description of the centrifugal force is akin to wrong, because and individual photons are the same
resolved, for eliminating infrared and ultraviolet waves, but not continuous - not coherent, like radio
catastrophes, by Planck. waves or laser radiation. And to use macroscopic wave
trains to describe their internal structure and even for a
IV. Cross Effects static Coulomb field is a clear mistake.
When they talk about "discovery" (supposedly
2019

Phenomenological cross effects describe in a made by Einstein) that light consists of particles, they do
linear approximation a flux determined by a non- not take into account that in the Einstein photoelectric
Year

fundamental force indirect for a given flux. Thus, the effect particles are pieces (trains, quanta) of incoherent
temperature force or the electric heat flux in scattered light. And the particles from which the
1 thermoelectric effects affects the electric current [6].
154 structure of the wave is built, even though the structure
Similar considerations can be made for charged of the constant field has nothing to do with the trains, do
particles, which naturally have mass. And not only. So in not have electromagnetic quanta. The zugs themselves
Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

a capacitor galvanometer electric, the recorded force consist of these subparticles. But so far these are
accelerating mass of the movable plate of the capacitor mythical (supposed) particles, the flow density of which
is balanced by the force of elasticity of the spring. One is from a microparticle, due to the continuity of the total
can consider, without additional force, the total effect of flow in a 3-dimensional space, and gives the laws of
the Coulomb force and gravity, say on the charged foil statics. But the flow is directly related to the departure
or currents in the atmosphere. The actual appearance of (loss) of particles, which is not. So, if we discard the
the charges themselves on the clouds is also assumption of a solid, such as a crystalline
determined by a similar cross-line effect, in this case, substructure, we have rather a “gas” density distribution
precisely in the flows of ion molecules in the of these mythical particles “above the surface” of
atmosphere. charge/mass. The characteristics of the medium of
But some observable effects, and in a simple subparticles: pressure and density, are set by their own
galvanic capacitor, when transverse, magnetic force field acting on the subparticles, and the adiabatic index
works similarly to an electrostatic force, and when the of the medium, which depends on the number of
light beam deflects when it passes near a massive star, degrees of freedom of the subparticle, determines the
we have a mass interaction with an electric field. limiting velocity of interaction in the medium.
Although, strictly speaking, the very holding on the This subfield and prevents them from scattering
particle and the mass and charge can also be to infinity from the microparticles. And this is not a
considered as their interaction. Therefore, it is logical to tautology, it is a manifestation of the principle of
assume that for different measures there is a cross-type logarithmic relativity - some models, taking into account
force the scale factors work on different scales of the
organization of matter. And the ancient Greeks, not
µ1µ2 qm knowing this formally, defined the atomic structure of
F12 =k12 ⋅ ⇔ kqm ⋅ = Fqm (14) matter correctly. And Lenin, saying that “an electron is
r2 r2 also inexhaustible as an atom” also had in mind the
previously known macroscopic “inexhaustibility” and the
So a priori suppose that the cross coefficient is possibility of its large-scale translation to an “infinite”
zero, there is no reason. And although, strictly speaking, logarithmic zero. But the crisis of modern physics is
there is also no reason, except for the three- evident in the fact that Lenin's formulation was
dimensionality of geometric space, to assume that this understood literally and subparticles began to be sought
force will be inversely proportional to the square of the in microparticles, while missing an important step -
distance, as in canonical laws. But the very presence of subparticles of the field. And they began to break down
such an “unaccounted” force does not simply explain microparticles in the co-particles, and not the same
the possibility of a static attraction of a positron to a light.
neutron or repulsion of an electron from it with the I personally was lucky to talk with Termen, who
formation of a proton, but taking into account Newton's was able to translate the most abstract ideas into
laws, it also allows to take into account the working devices, into the same termenvox. As he said,
“unaccounted” dynamics under the influence of this Einstein, when he came to him with a request to voice
force. elementary geometric figures on his termenvox, tried not

© 2019 Global Journals

 Newton's Coulomb Laws

to lose the thread linking his calculations with reality [14, 8, 2018. https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume
15, 16]. 18/EJournal_GJSFR_(A)_Vol_18_Issue_1.pdf
The modern theory tends to distance itself from 9. S.V. Ordin, «"Anomalies in Thermoelectricity and
reality, moving into fictitious and experimentally Reality are Local Thermo-EMFs», GJSFR-A Volume
unconfirmed ten-dimensional spaces. And the tighter 18 Issue 2 Version 1.0, p. 59-64, 2018
dimension of the subspace of the field is not so difficult https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume18/6-
to estimate, relying on Newton's Coulomb laws and on Anomalies-in-Thermoelectricity.pdf
the understanding that a continuous field without 10. Stanislav Ordin, “ELECTRONIC LEVELS AND
subparticles is as leaky as the number axis without CRYSTAL STRUCTURE”, Journal of Modern
irrational numbers. Experiments to study the structure of Technology & Engineering {ISSN 2519-4836} Vol.3,
fields or to create virtual particles by a field (as No.2, 2018, pp
described, for example, in [17]) will allow physics to 11. Ordin S.V., “Quasinuclear foundation for the

2019
return to the area of basic research related to reality, expansion of quantum mechanics", International
and not to particles of God. Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science

Year
(IJARPS)
VI. Conclusion 12. Volume 5, Issue 6, 2018, PP 35-45,
True Science is built on invariants, numerical https://www.arcjournals.org/international-journal-of- 155
1
and functional. And, as was shown, reliably established advanced-research-in-physical-science/volume-5-
issue-6/

Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( A ) Volume XIX Issue I Version I

invariants of a potential field: Newton's laws and
Coulomb's Law, allow us to describe a number of 13. Ordin S.V., Logarithmic relativity, Nanotechnology
modern scientific "anomalies." Society of Russia website, 2017, http://www.rusnor.
org/pubs/articles/15503.htm
References Références Referencias 14. A. Einstein, “Physics and Reality”, Science Press,
Moscow, 1965, 358 pp.
1. George B. Arfken and Hans J. Weber, Mathematical
15. Ordin S.V., Are gravitational waves open ?,
Methods for Physicists, 6th edition, Elsevier
Nanotechnology Society of Russia website, 2016,
Academic Press (2005)
http://www.rusnor.org/pubs/articles/14055.htm
2. OrdinS.V., Electrostatic propulsion. Part 1, the site of
16. Ordin S.V.,“The Value of Judgments
the Nanotechnology Society of Russia,2015,
(Considerations)”, Nanotechnology Society of
http://www.rusnor.org/pubs/articles/13041.htm
Russia website, 2018 http://www.rusnor.org/pubs/
3. OrdinS.V., Disgraced physics and the “particle of
articles/15781.htm
God”, the site of the Nanotechnology Society of
17. Ordin S.V., Electrostatic propulsion. Part 2,
Russia, 2012, http://www.rusnor.org/pubs/articles
Nanotechnology Society of Russia website, 2016,
/8058.htm
http://www.rusnor.org/pubs/articles/13759.htm
4. S. V. Ordin, Yu. V. Zhilyaev, V. V. Zelenin, V. N.
Panteleev, Local Thermoelectric Effects in Wide-
Gap Semiconductors, Semiconductors, 2017, Vol.
51, No. 7, pp. 883–886. DOI: 10.21883/FTP.2017.
07.44643.29
5. S. V. Ordin, Methodology of science, J. NBICS-
Science. Technologies, 2017, No. 1, p.53-65.
6. Ordin S.V., American Journal of Modern Physics,
Refinement and Supplement of Phenomenology of
Thermoelectricity, Volume 6, Issue 5, September
2017, Page: 96-107, http://www.ajmp.org/article?
journalid=122&doi=10.11648/j.ajmp.20170605.14
7. Ordin S.V., "Cardinal increase in the efficiency of
energy conversion based on local thermoelectric
effects", International Journal of Advanced Research
in Physical Science, Volume-4 Issue-12, p. 5-9,
2017. https://www.arcjournals.org/international-
journal-of-advanced-research-in-physical-science/
volume-4-issue-12/
8. S.V. Ordin, "Experimental and Theoretical Expansion
of the Phenomenology of Thermoelectricity", Global
Journal of Science Frontier Research- Physics &
Space Science (GJSFR-A) Volume 18, Issue 1, p. 1-

© 2019 Global Journals