A Safety Audit Report On Alif Garments L
A Safety Audit Report On Alif Garments L
A Safety Audit Report On Alif Garments L
Submitted by:
Mallik Shaheed Hussain .
ID: 14DH174,
Bangladesh Institute of Management
Batch: Evening 03(2014), PGD-HRM
1
Dated: 26 July, 2014
Dear Sir,
With due respect, I am pleased to present you this report on A Safety Audit
report on Alif Garments Ltd, 21/22, Babar Road Block-B, Mohammadpur ,
Dhaka, Bangladesh, . as an appropriate requirement of the subject on
“Industrial Safety, Health and Welfare”. Working for this audit has been an
interesting and informative experience for me. I have learnt many
unidentified facts about Garments Industry, the Factory Environment,
Factors that must be analyzed for existing Manufacturing plant in terms of
Safety & Health scenarios which I believe will be infinitely useful in my
professional career in the near future.
I have immensely enjoyed working on this report and hope that my work
will meet the level of your expectations.
Thanking you.
Sincerely yours,
2
Acknowledgement
3
Table of Contents
01 Abstract , Introduction 05
04 Paraphernalia/Equipment 10
11 Executive Summary 22
12 Appendix: 23
4
Abstract
Readymade garments are the most important export item from Bangladesh,
yet the working conditions and fire safety records in the factories are often
not up to the standard. Despite a number of initiatives to curb fire accidents
in the garment industry, there are still a significant number of fire
occurrences in this industry. Unfortunately, there is no comprehensive
statistics on the current status of fire provisions and management practices in
the readymade garment factories in Bangladesh. Given the management
practices (soft issues) are often as important as structural fire safety
measures, yet difficult to regulate, this paper develops a Fire Risk Index
(FRI), the first of its kind in Bangladesh, for soft parameters in the garment
industry. FRI for 60 random garment factories are developed through
surprise inspections to understand the current status of fire risk due to
inadequacies in the soft parameters. Results show that the mean FRI is 2.8
on a scale of 5.0, which indicates an alarming condition. Locked exit doors,
lack of emergency announcement system and lack of fire drills are the three
worst performers among the 24 investigated parameters and require
immediate attention from the regulators and stakeholders. We also observed
a U-shaped relationship between FRI and factory size. Factories that are
members of the industry’s trade lobby generally have better fire safety
practices than the non-members. Given the importance of the readymade
garment sector in many developing countries, poor fire safety record and
lack of information of fire safety, our approach of developing an FRI for the
industry can be very useful to understand the immediate concerns and thus
to curb fatalities and injuries from fire accidents in this sector.
1. Introduction
Readymade garments are the largest export sector in Bangladesh, with more
than 78% of the country’s total foreign earnings generated from this sector.
Bangladesh is also the second largest apparel exporter in the world with a
5
total export of USD $17.91 billion in the fiscal year of 2010-11 (BGMEA
2012). The garment sector has enjoyed a significant growth in Bangladesh
for the last three decades. From a humble beginning of 12 enterprises in
1978, the garment industry currently consists of 4,500 factories of various
6
adversely affects the reputation of the industry abroad, especially since the
working conditions in the manufacturing sectors in the developing countries
is a general cause of concern in many developed countries. Given the
importance of fire safety in the garment sector, there have been concerted
efforts from the government, the industry lobby (Bangladesh Garments
Manufacturers and Exporters Associations, BGMEA) and the international
buyers of the apparel products, to improve the fire safety culture and this has
indeed reduced the fire incidents and losses significantly.
However, the battle has not been fully won yet. Despite the various
measures, rules and regulations implemented in the past decades, there are
still several instances of fire outbreak in the garment factories every year,
resulting in significant losses of lives, livelihoods (through injuries),
equipments and materials (Ahmed and Hossain 2009). These incidents raise
questions about the effectiveness of existing fire prevention and fire fighting
rules, regulations and practices and whether more could be done to limit fire
occurrences and fire induced losses of lives and injuries. Especially,
enforcement of the rules and regulations and day-to-day health and safety
management practices on factory floor is a major issue. In order to improve
the fire safety in this industry, it is important to understand and quantify the
current state of affair in fire safety of the garments factories in the country.
As is common in any developing country, there is a lack of data on fire
safety in Bangladesh, and, although there are a few studies on fire safety
status in general (e.g. Islam and Adri 2008), no comprehensive fire safety
assessment of the garment factories were undertaken before. In the wake of a
recent fire disaster at a garment factory that killed more than 100 factory
workers (BBC 2012a), fire safety evaluation of the industry became even
more important.
Accordingly, this research investigates a 'random' sample of garment
factories from two regions within Dhaka city to assess their current fire
safety status. We develop a fire safety index (first of its kind in Bangladesh)
based on various parameters which are weighted using experts’ opinion in
order to rate the factories. Special emphasis of the current work is on
understanding the status of the ‘soft’ parameters in fire safety management
(e.g. whether there is water in the dedicated water tank for firefighting at the
time of inspection) rather than on the ‘hard’ parameters (e.g. whether there is
a dedicated water tank for firefighting), which is often the focus of the fire
safety certification process.
We are also interested in understanding if any of the soft parameters are
uniformly poor across all factories and if there is a relationship between the
fire safety/risk status with the size or location or other characteristics of the
7
factories. Knowledge about such parameters or potential relationships will
allow regulators and policy makers to narrow their focus on the specific
Ready made garment Factory.
Origin:
Objective:
Specific Objective:
8
5. Factory Building design review & recommendation
6. Electrical Safety assessment & recommendation
7. Machine Safety assessment & recommendation
8. Identification and recommendation for occupational health
9. Evaluation of Fire fighting training & Drill
Methodology:
This safety audit was conducted on Alif Garments Ltd at 21/22, Babar Road
Block-B, Mohammadpur Dhaka Bangladesh,. The Data Collection process
was through primary sources (Face to Face interviews, Department wise
Team meeting, and random sampling of the factory staffs) and physical
observations of the factory premise. No secondary data was used.
Scope:
The scope of the report is to analyze the safety awareness and safety
condition of a Ready made garment Factory resulting in finding non-
compliance issues and recommendations for correcting those issues to
elevate or upgrade the safety scenario in working and operating the said
Ready made garment Factory.
Drawback:
The findings of the safety audit are listed below. Only the non-compliance
issues are mentioned with suggested recommendations to improve the issues
with further relevant comments.
9
GENERAL INFORMATION
Factory Name: Alif Garments Ltd
Address: 21/22, Babar Road Block-B,
Mohammodpur, Dhaka
Country:
Bangladesh
City:
Dhaka
Zip Code: 1207
Audit Duration: 1 Days
Buildings in Complex: There is only one building in the premise used for
production.
Number of Building
Levels (Stories):Main Building/Production building:- Height from ground
level to roof: 21 m (69 ft), Highest occupied floor level:
18.29 m (60 ft), Stories above grade: 6 Stories below grade: 0 Occupied
levels: 6
Approximate
Building Area (SF): Main Building Area: 20500 sft.
Date of Building
Construction: 22.06.1983
10
Ancillary Structures in
Complex: No ancillary structures in complex.
Approximate Ancillary
Structures Area (SF): No ancillary structures in complex.
Number of Occupants: Total occupant: 350, Main building ground
floor: 11,1st floor: 66 , 2nd floor: 95, 3rd floor: 95, 4th floor: 27, 5th
1. Paraphernalia/Equipment
3. No high quantity fire Installment of water hose for Even though it can be
prevention instrument emergency fire fighting. Already inconvenient for raw
present(i.e Water there is a water hose of small materials (pharma), it
hydrant or water hose quantity which is not sufficient for
is recommended that
coil) full coverage. at least two point to be
installed as front and
back point for water
output.
4. Secondary Equipment -Installment of Sand Only fire extinguisher
for chemical fire or bucket( Minimum requirement) is avialble as a
chemical hazard which - Already have sufficient storage of primary prevention
is not sufficient as per Rubber Boot and gloves for equipment.
standard bench mark. chemical handling(As a safety
measure)
11
2. Job based Analysis
12
emergency procedure. response
ii. Regular training & drill on emergency committee is
procedures. recommended
13
limit of optimal use, additional space for space for emergency
resulting congested more spacious storage pathways and reduce
space because of place. heat.
machineries.
5. No secondary Implementation of Separation &
containment procedure proper containment minimal divider
or separate place for procedure with different between chemical
chemicals. types of chemicals as types will suffice.
well as separate storage Separation of
place. chemical,
machineries and
papers is mandatory.
6. Building integrity: No It is recommended that Major Re-
approval by concerned the company arrange an Engineering works is
authority for building inspection by the strongly
construction for this relevant authority for the recommended.
particular production premise and take
facility. No occupancy necessary steps to ensure
certificate either. building integrity.
7. No environment Acquisition of Day to day ETP
clearance certificate. environmental clearance monitoring and
certificate. compliance with
DoE.
1. No Maintenance of chronological NA
accident/incident accident/incident register
report is
maintained, very
Few found(only)
2. Deviation report Should maintain as daily routine NA
found but none basis.
consistently.
3. Insufficient of Implementation of regulation on Employees should be
PPE(Personal all times usage of Rubber Gloves made aware of the
14
protective while handling chemicals and necessity of the personal
equipment) not wearing Rubber boots while protective equipment
maintain up to handling large quantities of it. through regular training
the Mark i.Even though the sound level is and implemented standard
not above tolerance, usage of operating procedure
noise reducing ear plug is (SOP).
preferable.
ii. Similarly, usage of metal gloves
in cutting machine is advisable.
4. No sufficient Installment of More Backup light. Several charge lights are
backup light used as instant back up
light, back up generator
line comes from outside
supplier which supplies
power for several lights
only(No Generator for
machines).
5. No Safety Formation of safety committee Regular training and drills
cell/Committee and conducting regular safety will work greatly in this
or awareness awareness campaign. aspect.
activity
5. Electrical Wiring:
6. Machine Safety:
Machines are mostly safe with regular maintenance. The Heat
producing machines has separate exhaust pipe to outside. Additionally
15
some wall mounted revolving fans circulate the excess heat produced
while in production. The possibility of work hazard includes cutting
machine and various motors running in the press.
Safety Provision:
1. Identifying the
“Areas of
Improvement”
on Safety
through
Audit/Observation:
17
6. Factory Building Design Review & recommendation(subject to
availability of the original building architectural layout plan in soft
copy in AutoCAD only)
7. Electrical “Safety Assessment & Correction” where possible as per
recommendation of our Electrical Engineer.
8. Machine Safety Assessment & recommendation
9. Identification & recommendation for “Occupational Health”
10.Working “Uniform/Dress”, Safe for work_ awareness campaign
among the first line workers.
11. Recommendations for “Awareness Campaign Materials”.
12.Formation of “Safety Cell” (Safety Committee) for self Inspection &
carrying out safety events at a regular/scheduled interval.
13. Giving Complete Guideline to establish an “Emergency Safety
Clinic”.
14. Formation of “First Aid Team”
15. One day “First Aid Training” by Qualified Medical Professional (On
Additional Payment).
18
16. Fire protection Equipment & PPE :
19
18. Formation of “Fire Safety Cell (Team)” & Preparing Yearly Fire
Safety Drill Schedule(FSDS) :
20
SL Weight age Importance
1. 3 Highly Hazardous
2. 2 Medium Hazardous
3. 1 Hazardous
21
3. Documentation Fire License 2
4. Documentation HVAC System permission 1
Executive Summary
Alif Garments Ltd is a Garments factory among many in Mohammodpur and
Shaymoly area. In terms of machineries, it is a medium to small garment
and other related factory dealing with ready made production. As a safety
precaution equipment it has fire extinguishers, which act as the preliminary
fire fighting unit. The Chemical handling & storage situation is dismal & the
ventilation scenario is barely acceptable. Usage of space is far above optimal
level resulting congested space with very limited space for storage and
22
almost non-existent evacuation corridor in the workplace. Electrical wiring
nearly sufficient in terms of safety protocol with jacketed wiring and
separate switch boards for the machines.
Appendix:
23