0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views27 pages

Brucea Javanica Oil Emulsion Alleviates Cachexia Induced by Lewis Lung Cancer Cells in Mice

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 27

Journal of Drug Targeting

ISSN: 1061-186X (Print) 1029-2330 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/idrt20

Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates cachexia


induced by Lewis lung cancer cells in mice

Chao Chen & Binbin Wang

To cite this article: Chao Chen & Binbin Wang (2017): Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates
cachexia induced by Lewis lung cancer cells in mice, Journal of Drug Targeting, DOI:
10.1080/1061186X.2017.1354003

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1061186X.2017.1354003

Accepted author version posted online: 13


Jul 2017.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 1

View related articles

View Crossmark data

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=idrt20

Download by: [University of Canberra] Date: 16 July 2017, At: 05:12


Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates cachexia induced by Lewis

lung cancer cells in mice

Chao Chen 1, Binbin Wang 2*


1
Department of Radiotherapy, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese

Medicine, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China


2
Department of Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese

t
Medicine, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China

ip
*Corresponding Author Binbin Wang; Tel & Fax number: +86-571-87071083;

cr
E-mail: [email protected]; Postal address: Department of Oncology, Zhejiang

us
Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.54 on Youdian Road,
an
Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates cachexia induced by Lewis

lung cancer cells in mice

Abstract. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and possible mechanism of

Brucea javanica oil emulsion (BJOE) on cachexia, by observing changes in related indexes in

mice with cachexia and identifying the genes responsible based on gene chip analysis. In the

BJOE treatment group, body weight loss, tumor growth and metastasis were found obviously

inhibited, food and water intake had markedly increased, and survival time was significantly

t
ip
prolonged, as compared to the control group. Moreover, the BJOE witnessed improvement in

cr
body weight, prevention of tumor metastasis and overall increase in survival time, as

us
compared to Indometacin (IND, the positive control medicine). It was also found that TNF- α
an
and IL-6 in serum were significantly lower in both groups of BJOE and IND, than in the

control group (P<0.01). Based on the gene expression data, 7 and 6 hub genes of BJOE and
M

IND groups were found in the PPI networks, and three common genes comprising of Nmd3,
ed

Bcl2, and Nhp2l1 were screened. Thus, BJOE could reduce tumor growth and effectively

alleviate cancer cachexia, due to inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Nmd3, Bcl2,


pt

Nhp2l1 may be important drug targets, establishing the role of BJOE in the treatment of lung
ce

cancer induced cachexia.


Ac

Keywords. Brucea javanica oil emulsion, cachexia, drug targets, hub genes, lung cancer,

TNF-α
Introduction

Cancer cachexia is often seen in advanced stages of cancer. It is a wasting syndrome

characterized by a continuous loss of skeletal muscle mass (with or without loss of

fat), resulting in progressive functional impairment [1-3]. It significantly damages the

quality of life, accompanied by weight loss, anorexia, anemia and prolonged

depression [4,5]. It is estimated that 50%-80% of cancer patients experience cachexia,

t
ip
and it accounts for up to 20% of all cancer deaths [6]. Commonly used treatments

cr
include appetite stimulants, anti-depressives, and anti-emetics along with nutritional

us
therapy as a part of the best supportive care regimen. However, the side-effects and

intolerance, limit the existing treatment application for cancer cachexia, and research
an
on new therapies has become imperative. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) are
M

compliant, efficient and have lesser-toxicity in cancer patients, and hence have drawn

more attention in clinical practice [7-11].


ed

Brucea javanica (L.) Merr, belongs to the family Simaroubaceae, and is an


pt

evergreen shrub widely distributed in Southeast Asia and northern Australia.


ce

Quassinoids that are extracted from the fruits (or seeds) of B. javanica, as the main
Ac

active ingredients, possess various biological properties, such as antifungal,

anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties [12-15]. Recent

investigations have suggested that Brucea javanica could inhibit proliferation or

induce apoptosis in human liver cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, non-solid

tumors such as leukemia, etc. However, its effectiveness in cancer cachexia is still
unknown [16-19].

In this present study the effects of Brucea javanica oil emulsion (BJOE) on the

physiological status of Lewis lung carcinoma cachexia in mice was observed,

including food intake, body weight, tumor growth, lung metastasis, etc., and the

mechanism of BJOE in improving cancer cachexia was explored.

Materials and Methods

t
ip
Materials

cr
us
BJOE injections, Z19993152, each loaded with 10 ml emulsion, were purchased from
an
Zhejiang Jiuxu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Indometacin suppositories (IND),

H11021391, 100 mg each, were purchased from Beijing Twinluck Pharmaceutical Co.,
M

Ltd. and were dissolved in normal saline i.e. 0.2 mg/ml. Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC)
ed

cells were introduced from the pharmacology laboratory in China State Institute of

Pharmaceutical Industry (Shanghai). All enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


pt

(ELISA) kits were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. The Ambion Illumina RNA
ce

Amplification Kit, WG-6 BeadChip, Bead Array Reader and GenomeStudio were
Ac

provided by Illumina, Santiago, California, USA.

Animals

Forty-five male C57 BL/6 mice were provided by Central Lab Animal Inc. (Shanghai,

China) at 6-8 weeks of age (18-22g), and were kept in a pathogen-free environment.
They were randomized into three groups: (A) BJOE group, (B) IND group, (C)

control group (n=15 in each group). Mice in all three groups were injected

subcutaneously with 1.5×106 LLC cells in the anterior axilla on Day 0 and were fed

normally for 24 days. Then BJOE was administered at a dose of 40 ml/kg.bw to the

BJOE group, while the same volume of regular saline solution was administered in

the control group, and IND solution was administered at 5 ml/kg.bw (1 mg/kg.bw).

The concentrations of BJOE and IND were selected as per previous reports [20-23],

t
ip
which indicate the doses are optimal for cancer treatment with relatively fewer side

cr
effects. Moreover, the preliminary experiments with different doses of IND (1

us
ml/kg.bw, 5 ml/kg.bw, 10 ml/kg.bw, 20 ml/kg.bw) have proved that the effects of 5

ml/kg.bw IND on cachexia had reached a therapeutic plateau, therefore, 5 ml/kg.bw


an
(1 mg/kg.bw) IND concentration was selected in this study. Mice in all three groups
M

were administered i.p. once a day for 7 days. Body weight and tumor inoculation site
ed

for all mice were monitored weekly starting from Day 1. Food and water intake were

measured between 8:00 – 10:00 am daily. Tumor volume (V, cm3) was estimated from
pt

Day 4 onwards using the formula V=a*b2/2, with ‘a’ as length and ‘b’ as width. From
ce

the subcutaneous tumor block and the weight of mice, the anti-tumor rate (AR) was
Ac

calculated, AR = (c - d) *100%/c, where ‘c’ was considered as the mean weight of

tumor in the control group, and ‘d’ stood for the mean weight of tumor in BJOE or

IND treatment groups. The expansion tablet counting method was employed to

estimate the extent of lung metastases (LM) [24], i.e., the neoplastic nodules of edges

on the lung tissue surface. Further, the LM inhibition rate (LMIR) = (e - f) *100%/e,
was calculated, where ‘e’ was the number of LM in the control group, and ‘f’ was the

amount of LM in BJOE or IND treatment group. Survival time for the remaining mice

(8 in each group) was recorded and elongation of survival time (EST) was calculated.

All mouse protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee in the Animal

Experimentation Department of Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese

Medicine, in accordance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of

Laboratory Animal Care International.

t
ip
cr
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

us
Seven mice from each group were killed on day 31, with 1.5 ml of blood samples
an
collected from the canthus vein of each mouse, before being sacrificed. Blood

samples were made to stand for 1 hour and then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000
M

r/min. The serum was then stored at -70˚C. The levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α
ed

(TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined using ELISA kits, as per

manufacturer’s instructions.
pt
ce

Bioinformatics analysis
Ac

Gene expression profile

Total RNA was prepared from frozen tissue samples using TRIzol regent (Invitrogen,

Carlsbad, CA, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions, and the Ambion Illumina

RNA Amplification Kit was selected to perform RNA amplification. Then, cDNA was
synthesized using reverse transcription with an oligo (dT) primer. After purification,

the cDNA was hybridized on mouse WG-6 BeadChip in a multi-step procedure as per

the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescent dye labeling was done in the

hybridization process, by mixing GEX-HBY hybridization solution and RNA-free

enzyme with SA-Cy3 (Fluorlink Cy3). The chips were then washed, dried, and

scanned on the Bead Array Reader, and raw data was generated using GenomeStudio.

The raw data was normalized with GenomeStudio using a Cubic Spline algorithm

capable of minimizing nonlinear transformation effects in data [25]. The

t
ip
normalization used quantiles of sample intensities to fit smoothing B-splines. Let

𝑖−0.5 𝑁𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑠

cr
𝑞𝑖 = (i = 1, 2, …, N) to be a vector of N quantiles, 𝑁 = max⁡(15, ), of
𝑁 100

us
which Nprobes stood for the number of probes represented in a sample. After

normalization, probe correction was conducted for the perfect match and mismatch
an
probes [26], and then the probe expression value [27] was explored. The preprocessed
M

probe-level dataset in CEL formats were converted into expression measures, and

then screened using gene filter package [28]. Finally, a gene expression profile with
ed

30850 genes was obtained for further analyses.


pt

Identification of hub genes with potential prognostic impacts


ce

There were three groups of data in the gene expression profile, control, BJOE and
Ac

IND treated group. These were then divided into two groups, BJOE group (BJOE

treatment vs. controls) and IND group (IND treatment vs. controls). To identify hub

genes with potential prognostic impacts, DEGs were first identified in the two groups,

and then PPI networks of DEGS were constructed utilizing STRING database, to

explore hub genes which might be potential biomarkers for lung cancer cachexia in
mice.

Detections of DEGs

In this paper, DEGs identified from the two groups were based on linear models for

microarray data (Limma) package [29]. The P values for all genes were converted into

-log10 form after being manipulated with t and F test. Linear fit, empirical Bayes

statistics and false discovery rate (FDR) correction were applied to the available data

t
using Fit function [30]. Genes with threshold value of P < 0.05 and

ip
|log2FoldChange| >2 were regarded as DEGs.

cr
Construction of PPI network
us
an
In this section, possible functional associations between DEGs were investigated

using the STRING database, which provided a comprehensive, quality-controlled


M

collection of gene/protein associations for a large number of organisms on a global


ed

scale [31]. STRING could assess and integrate DEGs to obtain a confidence score for

all protein/gene interactions. Subsequently, these interactions were visualized by


pt

Cytoscape [32], a free software package for visualizing, modeling and analyzing the
ce

integration of bimolecular interaction networks with high-throughput expression data

and other molecular states.


Ac

Topological analysis of PPI networks

One of the fundamental problems in network analysis is to determine the importance

of a particular vertex or an edge in a network [33]. Quantifying centrality and

connectivity helps identify portions of the network that may play interesting roles.
Research has revealed that topological centrality is effective for identifying essential

molecules in well-characterized interaction networks [34]. In order to understand the

functionality of complex systems of gene signatures in the PPI networks in two

conditions, the biological importance of genes was characterized using topological

analysis (degree) index. The degree quantifies the local topology of each gene by

summing up the number of its adjacent genes [35]. It gives a simple count of the

number of interactions in a given node. The genes at the top of the degree distribution

(≥ 95% quantile) were defined as hub genes in the significantly perturbed networks.

t
ip
The degree D (v) of a node v was defined as

cr
D (v )   a vj
j

us
The relationship between the number of genes and degree distribution was also

studied. As the PPI networks in general are modular and scale-free, a fitting
an
coefficient R2 of the power-law 𝑌 = 𝑎𝑋 𝑏 of the objective networks was then
M

detected, which meant that the networks had power-law (or scale-free) degree

distributions [36,37]. The Network Analyzer 2.7 plugin in Cytoscape 3.1.0 was used
ed

for the evaluation of topological parameters.


pt

Statistical analysis
ce

The results were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS,
Ac

Chicago, IL, USA) [38]. The data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation. One

way ANOVA was then implemented to compare the differences between the groups.

In addition, 0.01 < P < 0.05 was considered to be a statistically significant difference,

and P < 0.01 was regarded as statistically significant.


Results

BJOE led to obvious improvement in cachexia status.

In preliminary experiments, it was found that there was an obvious change in the

physical status and amount of activity in mice 24 days after inoculation, including

anorexia, hypokinesis and subcutaneous tumor growth. The body weight decreased

t
rapidly on the 24th day, and the mice entered into a state of cachexia, hence they were

ip
treated from Day 24 for 7 days. Right from the time they were inoculated to 24 days

cr
later, the food and water intake of the mice decreased persistently, and no significant

us
differences in body weight were observed in all three groups. Post-treatment, in the
an
BJOE group, the body weight, and food and water intake in mice showed no
M

significant decline, while that in the control group decreased markedly. In the IND

groups, the decrease in body weight was similar to the control group. There was an
ed

obvious increase in food intake and water intake showed no significant decline. It was
pt

apparent that body weight improved more in the group on BJOE than those in the
ce

IND one. (Figure.1, Table.1).


Ac

BJOE inhibited tumor growth and increased survival time in mice with cachexia.

After treatment, the tumor growth rate in mice was slower, and tumor weight and

pulmonary metastases were significantly less in the BJOE group as compared to the

control group. Also the anti-tumor rate was 22.5% and pulmonary metastasis
inhibition rate was 39.75% on day 7, and the survival time in mice was significantly

longer. Whereas, there was no obvious difference in tumor growth rate in the IND

group as compared to those from the control group. The average tumor weight was

more, pulmonary metastasis inhibition rate was 13.25% on day 7, and the survival

time in mice was significantly longer. On comparing BJOE and IND, there was a

more marked effect of BJOE on survival time extension, tumor growth rate and

pulmonary metastasis inhibition, than in the IND group (Figure.1, Table.1).

t
ip
BJOE lowered TNF- α and IL-6 in mice with cachexia.

cr
us
Cytokines including TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1a, IL-1b, interferon-c, and IL-6 play an
an
important role in the occurrence and development of cancer cachexia [39]. In this

experiment, both TNF-α and IL-6 in mice decreased significantly in the BJOE group
M

than in the control group. The effects of IND were similar to BJOE; however,
ed

cytokine decrease was greater in mice treated with BJOE than with IND (Table.1).
pt

Nmd3, Bcl2, Nhp2l1 may be important drug targets for BJOE.


ce

The correlation between average signals for BJOE treatment to normal controls was
Ac

similar to that of IND treatment in normal controls (Figure.2 & 3). Totally, 555 and

519 DEGs were identified for BJOE and IND groups, respectively, considering P <

0.05 and |log2FoldChange| >2. To explore the significance of gene interactions among

DEGs, PPI networks were constructed on the basis of the STRING database.

Simultaneously, the degree of distribution for all genes mapped to the PPI network

was displayed, as shown in Figure 4. There were 172 nodes and 251 edges (Figure 5)
in the BJOE group. Network analysis showed that the PPI network presented

scale-free properties and the degree of distribution followed a power law (𝑌 = 𝑎𝑋 𝑏 ,

where a = 67.05, b = -1.107) with the fitting coefficients R2 (R2 = 0.9985). A total of

138 DEGs were mapped to PPI networks in the IND group, with 177 resultant

interactions (Figure 6). The degree of distribution of PPI network in the IND group

also obeyed another power law, 𝑌 = 𝑎𝑋 𝑏 , where a = 60.91, b = -1.137 and R2 =

0.9868. These indicated that the two PPI networks possessed properties of small

world network.

t
ip
A degree centrality analysis was conducted, and 7 hub genes (Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3,

cr
Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and Tfb1m) for the BJOE group and 6 hub genes (Bcl2, Frk,

Nmd3, Eps15, Myh2 and Nhp2l1) for the IND group were obtained. Interestingly,

us
three common hub genes were found for the two groups – Nmd3, Bcl2, and Nhp2l1,
an
which might play more important roles in Lewis lung carcinoma in mice than other

genes, and have greater potential to be prognostic markers of this tumor target
M

treatment.
ed

Discussion
pt
ce

In this study, it was found that BJOE was effective in treating lung cancer cachexia.

Furthermore, it exhibited greater superiority with respect to improvement in body


Ac

weight, tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis inhibition, and survival extension

time compared to IND, which is commonly used in clinical practice. The function was

achieved through down-regulating the level of TNF-α and IL-6, and regulating the

relevant target genes in the downstream pathway. In this experiment, body weight,

food and water intake, tumor growth (tumor weight and tumor volume), pulmonary
metastasis, and survival time were compared in mice treated by BJOE, IND and

normal saline solution. BJOE significantly slowed down weight loss and tumor

growth, increased food and water intake, inhibited pulmonary metastasis, and

prolonged the survival time as compared to the control group.

IND is commonly used to treat patients with cancer. Ikawa et. al. had

demonstrated that Indometacin could antagonize prostanoids such as prostaglandin E

(2), which is considered as a biomarker for colorectal cancer [40]. Also IND

t
ip
decreased protein degradation by acting on ubiquitin-dependent proteases, reduced the

cr
levels of TNF-α and IL6, and alleviated muscle wasting in animals with cancer [41].

us
A clinical study of patients with cancer cachexia indicated that IND suppressed

cyclooxygenase, improved energy homeostasis, and reduced chronic inflammation


an
[42]. However, as a cyclooxygenase-inhibitor, IND had some typical side-effects,
M

including gastrointestinal ulceration, blood coagulation disorders and anaphylaxis,


ed

which limited its application in clinical treatment. It has been demonstrated that BJOE

has significant use in the treatment of lung cancer, with prominent benefits and lesser
pt

adverse effects [43]. It could also induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via reactive
ce

oxygen species-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in human lung cancer cells [44],


Ac

but it has not been used so far for treatment of lung cancer cachexia. In this study, the

treatment effects of BJOE and IND on lung cancer cachexia in mice was compared,

and better results were observed in the group on BJOE as compared to those on IND.

Therefore, BJOE could be used as a candidate or auxiliary drug in the treatment of

lung cancer cachexia in the future.


Excessive elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α is

involved in cachexia-related hyper-catabolism [45]. IL-6 is a promising discovery in

the therapeutic strategy for attenuating cachexia progression through target adipose,

skeletal muscle, gut, and liver tissue. All of these factors affect patient recovery from

cachexia. TNF-α has a direct catabolic effect on skeletal muscles and causes muscle

wasting by the induction of the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). TNF-α is

responsible for increasing gluconeogenesis, loss of adipose tissue and proteolysis,

t
ip
resulting in decrease in protein, lipid and glycogen synthesis in cancer cachexia

cr
[46,47]. In this study, BJOE obviously decreased TNF-α and IL-6 levels, thus

us
illustrating that BJOE could decrease cancer cachexia to some extent, based on the

reduction of serum TNF-α and IL-6 levels.


an
Successful treatment of diseases was commonly done through gene expression
M

regulation and some important signal transmission. In order to further explore the
ed

treatment mechanism of BJOE for lung cancer cachexia, the influence of BJOE on

genes was analyzed, based on appropriate gene chips. In this study, 7 hub genes
pt

(Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3, Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and Tfb1m) were found. Interestingly, Nmd3,
ce

Bcl2, and Nhp2l1 were also found in the IND treatment group, which meant that they
Ac

were more important than other hub genes in the treatment of lung cancer cachexia.

Nmd3 (nonsense-mediated decay 3) is an adaptor for exporting 60S ribosomal subunit

from the nucleus, and binds to nascent 60S subunits while exporting receptor

chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (Crm1). This facilitates its passage

through the nuclear pore complex [48]. Moreover, Crm1 and Nmd3 have complex
functions in pathways that couple rRNA synthetic and processing engines, and the

dysregulated functions may have been responsible for the onset of cancer [49]. A

mutation in Nmd3 was found to be lethal in the absence of 5'-3' exoribonuclease 1

(XRN1), which encodes a major cytoplasmic exoribonuclease, also responsible for

mRNA turnover [50]. Bcl2 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2) family proteins are key

regulators of the cell apoptotic process [51]. It is predominantly located in

mitochondria, which is the central coordinator of both intracellular and extracellular

t
ip
signals, mediating cell death of caspase-dependent and caspase-independent [52,53]

cr
cell structures. Stolz et al reported that induction of mitochondrial apoptosis is

us
required in the involvement of BCL-2 [54]. Furthermore, overexpression of Bcl2

blocks TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), induced apoptosis in human


an
lung cancer cells [55]. Besides, Bcl2 acted synergistically in the occurrence,
M

development, invasion and metastasis of NSCLC [56,57], and the co-expression of


ed

survivin and Bcl2 may serve as a biomarker for predicting prognosis of lung cancer

[58]. Therefore, Bcl2 played a significant role in lung cancer and might be a potential
pt

biomarker for lung cancer target therapy. Nhp2l1 (NHP 2-like protein 1, fibrillarin)
ce

process pre-rRNA through the post-transcriptional modifications, 2’-O-methylation


Ac

and pseudouridylation reaction, as the core member of the box C/D small nucleolar

RNP (snoRNP) complex in nucleolus, its dysregulation is frequently observed in

cancer [59]. It is also an essential regulator of myogenesis by preventing muscle

defects and stabilizing skeletal muscle development [60]. It thus has close relation

with weight loss in cancer cachexia. Also some new genes (Ftsj3, Rhob, Cct2 and
Tfb1m) were discovered in the BJOE group but not in the IND group, suggesting that

BJOE is superior to IND in the treatment of cancer cachexia. Cachexia may be

responsible for these key genes, but further study needs be carried out to verify this

inference.

Conclusions

t
In conclusion, BJOE alleviated lung cancer cachexia and inhibited the tumor. The

ip
mechanism involved down-regulating inflammatory cytokines and regulating the

cr
expression of the relevant genes, mainly Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3, Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and

us
Tfb1m. This finding provides new insights into treatment of lung cancer cachexia.
an
Acknowledgments
M

We thank colleagues affiliated with our laboratory for their technical assistance and
ed

helpful comments.
pt

Compliance with ethical standards


ce
Ac

All mouse protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee in the Animal

Experimentation Department of Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese

Medicine, in accordance with the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of

Laboratory Animal Care International.


Declaration of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Reference

1. Mochamat, Cuhls H, Marinova M, et al. A systematic review on the role of

t
vitamins, minerals, proteins, and other supplements for the treatment of cachexia

ip
in cancer: a European Palliative Care Research Centre cachexia project. J
Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle.2017;8(1):25-39.

cr
2. Arthur ST, Van Doren BA, Roy D, et al. Cachexia among US cancer patients. J
Med Econ.2016;19(9):874-880.

us
3. Tisdale MJ. Cancer cachexia. Langenbecks Arch Surg.2004;389(4):299-305.
4. Takayama K, Atagi S, Imamura F, et al. Quality of life and survival survey of
cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients-Japan nutrition
an
and QOL survey in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer study.
Support Care Cancer.2016;24(8):3473-3480.
5. Tan BH, Fearon KC. Cachexia: prevalence and impact in medicine. Curr Opin
M

Clin Nutr Metab Care.2008;11(4):400-407.


6. Argiles JM, Busquets S, Stemmler B, et al. Cancer cachexia: understanding the
molecular basis. Nat Rev Cancer.2014;14(11):754-762.
ed

7. Zhang Y, Han X, Ouyang B, et al. Chinese Herbal Medicine Baoyuan Jiedu


Decoction Inhibited Muscle Atrophy of Cancer Cachexia through Atrogin-l and
MuRF-1. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med.2017;2017:1-10.
pt

8. Hsiao WL, Liu L. The role of traditional Chinese herbal medicines in cancer
therapy—from TCM theory to mechanistic insights. Planta
ce

Med.2010;76(11):1118-1131.
9. Qi F, Li A, Inagaki Y, et al. Chinese herbal medicines as adjuvant treatment
Ac

during chemo- or radio-therapy for cancer. Biosci Trends.2010;4(6):297-307.


10. Cheng KC, Li YX, Cheng JT. The use of herbal medicine in cancer-related
anorexia/ cachexia treatment around the world. Curr Pharm
Des.2012;18(31):4819-4826.
11. Borchers AT, Sakai S, Henderson GL, et al. Shosaiko-to and other Kampo
(Japanese herbal) medicines: a review of their immunomodulatory activities. J
Ethnopharmacol.2000;73(1-2):1-13.
12. Nordin MA, Wan Harun WH, Abdul Razak F. Antifungal susceptibility and
growth inhibitory response of oral Candida species to Brucea javanica Linn.
extract. BMC Complement Altern Med.2013;13:342-349.
13. Ablat A, Mohamad J, Awang K, et al. Evaluation of antidiabetic and antioxidant
properties of Brucea javanica seed. Scientific World J.2014;2014:1-8.
14. Huang YF, Zhou JT, Qu C, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of Brucea javanica oil
emulsion by suppressing NF-kappaB activation on dextran sulfate
sodium-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. J Ethnopharmacol.2017;198:389-398.
15. Yan Z, Guo GF, Zhang B. Research of Brucea javanica against cancer. Chin J
Integr Med.2016;23(2):153-160.
16. Shi WR, Liu Y, Wang XT, et al. Antitumor Efficacy and Mechanism in Hepatoma
H22-Bearing Mice of Brucea javanica Oil. Evid Based Complement Alternat
Med.2015;2015:1-8.
17. Yan Z, Zhang B, Huang Y, et al. Involvement of autophagy inhibition in Brucea
javanica oil emulsion-induced colon cancer cell death. Oncol
Lett.2015;9(3):1425-1431.

t
18. Ye H, Liu X, Sun J, et al. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of LHRHa-targeted

ip
brucea javanica oil liposomes for ovarian cancer. BMC
cancer.2016;16(1):831-843.

cr
19. Kim JA, Lau EK, Pan L, et al. NF-kappaB inhibitors from Brucea javanica
exhibiting intracellular effects on reactive oxygen species. Anticancer

us
Res.2010;30(9):3295-3300.
20. Chen SZ, Qiu ZG. Combined treatment with GH, insulin, and indomethacin
alleviates cancer cachexia in a mouse model. J Endocrinol.2011;208(2):131-136.
an
21. Zhou W, Jiang ZW, Tian J, et al. Role of NF-kappaB and cytokine in
experimental cancer cachexia. World J Gastroenterol.2003;9(7):1567-1570.
22. Yue Y, Yang Y, Shi L, et al. Suppression of human hepatocellular cancer cell
M

proliferation by Brucea javanica oil-loaded liposomes via induction of apoptosis.


Arch Med Sci.2015;11 (4):856-862.
23. Yan Z, Zhang B, Huang Y, et al. Involvement of autophagy inhibition in Brucea
ed

javanica oil emulsion-induced colon cancer cell death. Oncol


Lett.2015;9(3):1425-1431.
24. Backhus LM, Sievers E, Lin GY, et al. Perioperative cyclooxygenase 2 inhibition
pt

to reduce tumor cell adhesion and metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells
in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2006;132(2):297-303.
ce

25. Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose‐response analyses using restricted cubic spline


functions in public health research. Stat Med.2010;29(9):1037-1057.
Ac

26. Pepper SD, Saunders EK, Edwards LE, et al. The utility of MAS5 expression
summary and detection call algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics.2007;8:273-284.
27. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip
probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res.2003;31(4):e15-e22.
28. Lee J, Kim D-W. Efficient multivariate feature filter using conditional mutual
information. Electron Lett.2012;48(3):161-162.
29. Smyth GK. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Bioinformatics and
computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer: 2005; pp
397-420.
30. Diboun I, Wernisch L, Orengo CA, et al. Microarray analysis after RNA
amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma.
BMC genomics.2006;7(1):252-263.
31. Taboada B, Verde C, Merino E. High accuracy operon prediction method based
on STRING database scores. Nucleic Acids Res.2010;38(12):e130-e139.
32. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, et al. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data
integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics.2011;27(3):431-432.
33. Bader DA, Madduri K, editors. Madduri In Parallel algorithms for evaluating
centrality indices in real-world networks. Parallel Processing, 2006 Aug 14-18;
Columbus, USA.: ICPP 2006. International Conference on, IEEE Press; 2006. P.
539-550.
34. Prifti E, Zucker J-D, Clément K, et al. Interactional and functional centrality in
transcriptional co-expression networks. Bioinformatics.2010;26(24):3083-3089.
35. Haythornthwaite C. Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the

t
study of information exchange. Library & information science

ip
research.1996;18(4):323-342.
36. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, et al. Hierarchical organization of modularity

cr
in metabolic networks. Science.2002;297(5586):1551-1555.
37. Rifai N, Ridker PM. Proposed cardiovascular risk assessment algorithm using

us
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipid screening. Clin
Chem.2001;47(1):28-30.
38. Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: a guide
an
for social scientists. London (LON): Psychology Press; 2005.
39. Bonetto A, Aydogdu T, Kunzevitzky N, et al. STAT3 activation in skeletal muscle
links muscle wasting and the acute phase response in cancer cachexia. PLoS
M

One.2011;6(7):e22538-e22554.
40. Ikawa Y, Fujino H, Otake S, et al. Indomethacin antagonizes EP(2) prostanoid
receptor activation in LS174T human colon cancer cells. Eur J
ed

Pharmacol.2012;680(1-3):16-21.
41. Zhou W, Jiang Z-W, Tian J, et al. Role of NF-kappaB and cytokine in
experimental cancer cachexia. World J Gastroenterol.2003;9(7):1567-1570.
pt

42. Lundholm K, Daneryd P, Bosaeus I, et al. Palliative nutritional intervention in


addition to cyclooxygenase and erythropoietin treatment for patients with
ce

malignant disease: effects on survival, metabolism, and function.


Cancer.2004;100(9):1967-1977.
Yang XL. 鸦胆子油乳治疗肺癌肺叶切除术后胸液过多的疗效观察[Effects of
Ac

43.
Bruceolic Oil Emulsion in Treating Thoracic Liquid after Lobectomy of Lung
Cancer]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine.2008;8(8):1483-1491.Chinese.
44. Wang D, Qu X, Zhuang X, et al. Seed Oil of Brucea javanica Induces Cell Cycle
Arrest and Apoptosis via Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Mitochondrial
Dysfunction in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Nutr Cancer.2016;68(8):1394-1403.
45. Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Yun J, et al. Pathophysiological role of hormones and cytokines
in cancer cachexia. J Korean Med Sci.2012;27(2):128-134.
46. Narsale AA, Carson JA. Role of interleukin-6 in cachexia: therapeutic
implications. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care.2014;8(4):321-327.
47. Patel HJ, Patel BM. TNF-alpha and cancer cachexia: Molecular insights and
clinical implications. Life Sci.2017;170:56-63.
48. Sengupta J, Bussiere C, Pallesen J, et al. Characterization of the nuclear export
adaptor protein Nmd3 in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit. J Cell
Biol.2010;189(7):1079-1086.
49. Bai B, Moore HM, Laiho M. CRM1 and its ribosome export adaptor NMD3
localize to the nucleolus and affect rRNA synthesis. Nucleus.2013;4(4):315-325.
50. Buhlmann M, Walrad P, Rico E, et al. NMD3 regulates both mRNA and rRNA
nuclear export in African trypanosomes via an XPOI-linked pathway. Nucleic
Acids Res.2015;43(9):4491-4504.
51. Antonsson B. Bax and other pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family" killer-proteins" and their
victim the mitochondrion. Cell Tissue Res.2001;306(3):347-361.
52. Mehmeti I, Lenzen S, Lortz S. Modulation of Bcl-2-related protein expression in

t
pancreatic beta cells by pro-inflammatory cytokines and its dependence on the

ip
antioxidative defense status. Mol Cell Endocrinol.2011;332(1):88-96.
53. Santos AO, Pereira JP, Pedroso de Lima MC, et al. In vitro modulation of Bcl-2

cr
levels in small cell lung cancer cells: effects on cell viability. Braz J Med Biol
Res.2010;43(10):1001-1009.

us
54. Stolz C, Hess G, Hähnel PS, et al. Targeting Bcl-2 family proteins modulates the
sensitivity of B-cell lymphoma to rituximab-induced apoptosis.
Blood.2008;112(8):3312-3321.
an
55. Sun SY, Yue P, Zhou JY, et al. Overexpression of BCL2 blocks TNF-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.2001;280(3):788-797.
M

56. Anagnostou VK, Lowery FJ, Zolota V, et al. High expression of BCL-2 predicts
favorable outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients with non squamous
histology. BMC cancer.2010;10(1):186-196.
ed

57. Wong M, Tan N, Zha J, et al. Navitoclax (ABT-263) reduces Bcl-xL–mediated


chemoresistance in ovarian cancer models. Mol Cancer
Ther.2012;11(4):1026-1035.
pt

58. Gao Q, Yang S, Kang M-Q. Influence of survivin and Bcl-2 expression on the
biological behavior of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Med
ce

Rep.2012;5(6):1409-1414.
59. Morimoto M, Boerkoel CF. The role of nuclear bodies in gene expression and
Ac

disease. Biology.2013;2(3):976-1033.
60. Johnson AN, Mokalled MH, Valera JM, et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of
myotube elongation and myogenesis by Hoi Polloi.
Development.2013;140(17):3645-3656.
Table

Figures

Figure legends

Figure 1 Changes in body weight, food and water intake, tumor volume in

tumor-bearing mice. (A) body weight, (B) food intake, (C) water intake, and (D)

t
ip
tumor volume

cr
Figure 2 Fluorescently-labeled scan images of chips for control group (A), Brucea

us
javanica oil emulsion group (B) and Indometacin group(C).
an
Figure 3 Average signal strength for gene expression profile. A: Brucea javanica oil

emulsion treatment vs. normal controls (BJOE group); B: Indometacin treatment vs.
M

normal controls (IND group).


ed

Figure 4 Distribution of genes in the PPI networks. A: Brucea javanica oil emulsion

treatment vs. normal controls (BJOE group); B: Indometacin treatment vs. normal
pt

controls (IND group).


ce

Figure 5 PPI networks for Brucea javanica oil emulsion treatment vs. normal controls.
Ac

Nodes were genes and edges were the interactions among genes. The roseo nodes

represented hub genes with degree sequence ≥ 95%.

Figure 6 PPI networks for Indometacin treatment vs. normal controls. Nodes were

genes and edges were the interactions among genes. The roseo nodes represented hub

genes with degree sequence ≥ 95%.


Ac
ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip
t
Ac
ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip
t
Ac
ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip
t
Ac
ce
pt
ed
M
an
us
cr
ip
t
Table 1 Effects of BJOE and IND on mice with cachexia

Group control BJOE IND

Bodyweight, g 18.71±1.64 20.08±1.37* 18.88±2.23

Food intake, g 2.09±0.09 2.41±0.17* 2.34±0.10*

Water intake, ml 2.77±0.17 3.23±0.26* 3.26±0.35*

Tumor mass, g 1.88±0.62 1.47±0.53* 2.15±0.22

AR, % 0 22.05% -14.34%

Tumor volume, cm3 1.46±0.70 1.09±0.53 1.92±0.48

t
ip
NLM 11.85±3.18 7.14±2.68* 10.28±2.63

cr
LMIR, % 0 39.75 13.25

Survival time, day 36.00±2.37 45.57±4.47** 43.17±3.12**

TNF-α, fmol/ml 26.79±13.79


us
8.50±6.02** 11.99±6.85*
an
IL-6, pg/ml 200.94±99.57 83.99±48.72* 90.25±37.86*
M

AR, NLM, LMIR, were abbreviations of anti-tumor rate, number of lung metastasis

and lung metastasis inhibition rate respectively. * P < 0.05 significantly different
ed

compared to control group. ** P < 0.01 significantly different compared to control


pt

group. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.


ce
Ac

You might also like