Brucea Javanica Oil Emulsion Alleviates Cachexia Induced by Lewis Lung Cancer Cells in Mice
Brucea Javanica Oil Emulsion Alleviates Cachexia Induced by Lewis Lung Cancer Cells in Mice
Brucea Javanica Oil Emulsion Alleviates Cachexia Induced by Lewis Lung Cancer Cells in Mice
To cite this article: Chao Chen & Binbin Wang (2017): Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates
cachexia induced by Lewis lung cancer cells in mice, Journal of Drug Targeting, DOI:
10.1080/1061186X.2017.1354003
Article views: 1
t
Medicine, Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China
ip
*Corresponding Author Binbin Wang; Tel & Fax number: +86-571-87071083;
cr
E-mail: [email protected]; Postal address: Department of Oncology, Zhejiang
us
Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.54 on Youdian Road,
an
Hangzhou, 310007, Zhejiang Province, China
M
ed
pt
ce
Ac
Brucea javanica oil emulsion alleviates cachexia induced by Lewis
Abstract. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and possible mechanism of
Brucea javanica oil emulsion (BJOE) on cachexia, by observing changes in related indexes in
mice with cachexia and identifying the genes responsible based on gene chip analysis. In the
BJOE treatment group, body weight loss, tumor growth and metastasis were found obviously
inhibited, food and water intake had markedly increased, and survival time was significantly
t
ip
prolonged, as compared to the control group. Moreover, the BJOE witnessed improvement in
cr
body weight, prevention of tumor metastasis and overall increase in survival time, as
us
compared to Indometacin (IND, the positive control medicine). It was also found that TNF- α
an
and IL-6 in serum were significantly lower in both groups of BJOE and IND, than in the
control group (P<0.01). Based on the gene expression data, 7 and 6 hub genes of BJOE and
M
IND groups were found in the PPI networks, and three common genes comprising of Nmd3,
ed
Bcl2, and Nhp2l1 were screened. Thus, BJOE could reduce tumor growth and effectively
Nhp2l1 may be important drug targets, establishing the role of BJOE in the treatment of lung
ce
Keywords. Brucea javanica oil emulsion, cachexia, drug targets, hub genes, lung cancer,
TNF-α
Introduction
t
ip
and it accounts for up to 20% of all cancer deaths [6]. Commonly used treatments
cr
include appetite stimulants, anti-depressives, and anti-emetics along with nutritional
us
therapy as a part of the best supportive care regimen. However, the side-effects and
intolerance, limit the existing treatment application for cancer cachexia, and research
an
on new therapies has become imperative. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCM) are
M
compliant, efficient and have lesser-toxicity in cancer patients, and hence have drawn
Quassinoids that are extracted from the fruits (or seeds) of B. javanica, as the main
Ac
induce apoptosis in human liver cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, non-solid
tumors such as leukemia, etc. However, its effectiveness in cancer cachexia is still
unknown [16-19].
In this present study the effects of Brucea javanica oil emulsion (BJOE) on the
including food intake, body weight, tumor growth, lung metastasis, etc., and the
t
ip
Materials
cr
us
BJOE injections, Z19993152, each loaded with 10 ml emulsion, were purchased from
an
Zhejiang Jiuxu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Indometacin suppositories (IND),
H11021391, 100 mg each, were purchased from Beijing Twinluck Pharmaceutical Co.,
M
Ltd. and were dissolved in normal saline i.e. 0.2 mg/ml. Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC)
ed
cells were introduced from the pharmacology laboratory in China State Institute of
(ELISA) kits were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. The Ambion Illumina RNA
ce
Amplification Kit, WG-6 BeadChip, Bead Array Reader and GenomeStudio were
Ac
Animals
Forty-five male C57 BL/6 mice were provided by Central Lab Animal Inc. (Shanghai,
China) at 6-8 weeks of age (18-22g), and were kept in a pathogen-free environment.
They were randomized into three groups: (A) BJOE group, (B) IND group, (C)
control group (n=15 in each group). Mice in all three groups were injected
subcutaneously with 1.5×106 LLC cells in the anterior axilla on Day 0 and were fed
normally for 24 days. Then BJOE was administered at a dose of 40 ml/kg.bw to the
BJOE group, while the same volume of regular saline solution was administered in
the control group, and IND solution was administered at 5 ml/kg.bw (1 mg/kg.bw).
The concentrations of BJOE and IND were selected as per previous reports [20-23],
t
ip
which indicate the doses are optimal for cancer treatment with relatively fewer side
cr
effects. Moreover, the preliminary experiments with different doses of IND (1
us
ml/kg.bw, 5 ml/kg.bw, 10 ml/kg.bw, 20 ml/kg.bw) have proved that the effects of 5
were administered i.p. once a day for 7 days. Body weight and tumor inoculation site
ed
for all mice were monitored weekly starting from Day 1. Food and water intake were
measured between 8:00 – 10:00 am daily. Tumor volume (V, cm3) was estimated from
pt
Day 4 onwards using the formula V=a*b2/2, with ‘a’ as length and ‘b’ as width. From
ce
the subcutaneous tumor block and the weight of mice, the anti-tumor rate (AR) was
Ac
tumor in the control group, and ‘d’ stood for the mean weight of tumor in BJOE or
IND treatment groups. The expansion tablet counting method was employed to
estimate the extent of lung metastases (LM) [24], i.e., the neoplastic nodules of edges
on the lung tissue surface. Further, the LM inhibition rate (LMIR) = (e - f) *100%/e,
was calculated, where ‘e’ was the number of LM in the control group, and ‘f’ was the
amount of LM in BJOE or IND treatment group. Survival time for the remaining mice
(8 in each group) was recorded and elongation of survival time (EST) was calculated.
All mouse protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee in the Animal
t
ip
cr
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
us
Seven mice from each group were killed on day 31, with 1.5 ml of blood samples
an
collected from the canthus vein of each mouse, before being sacrificed. Blood
samples were made to stand for 1 hour and then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3000
M
r/min. The serum was then stored at -70˚C. The levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α
ed
(TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined using ELISA kits, as per
manufacturer’s instructions.
pt
ce
Bioinformatics analysis
Ac
Total RNA was prepared from frozen tissue samples using TRIzol regent (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions, and the Ambion Illumina
RNA Amplification Kit was selected to perform RNA amplification. Then, cDNA was
synthesized using reverse transcription with an oligo (dT) primer. After purification,
the cDNA was hybridized on mouse WG-6 BeadChip in a multi-step procedure as per
enzyme with SA-Cy3 (Fluorlink Cy3). The chips were then washed, dried, and
scanned on the Bead Array Reader, and raw data was generated using GenomeStudio.
The raw data was normalized with GenomeStudio using a Cubic Spline algorithm
t
ip
normalization used quantiles of sample intensities to fit smoothing B-splines. Let
𝑖−0.5 𝑁𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑒𝑠
cr
𝑞𝑖 = (i = 1, 2, …, N) to be a vector of N quantiles, 𝑁 = max(15, ), of
𝑁 100
us
which Nprobes stood for the number of probes represented in a sample. After
normalization, probe correction was conducted for the perfect match and mismatch
an
probes [26], and then the probe expression value [27] was explored. The preprocessed
M
probe-level dataset in CEL formats were converted into expression measures, and
then screened using gene filter package [28]. Finally, a gene expression profile with
ed
There were three groups of data in the gene expression profile, control, BJOE and
Ac
IND treated group. These were then divided into two groups, BJOE group (BJOE
treatment vs. controls) and IND group (IND treatment vs. controls). To identify hub
genes with potential prognostic impacts, DEGs were first identified in the two groups,
and then PPI networks of DEGS were constructed utilizing STRING database, to
explore hub genes which might be potential biomarkers for lung cancer cachexia in
mice.
Detections of DEGs
In this paper, DEGs identified from the two groups were based on linear models for
microarray data (Limma) package [29]. The P values for all genes were converted into
-log10 form after being manipulated with t and F test. Linear fit, empirical Bayes
statistics and false discovery rate (FDR) correction were applied to the available data
t
using Fit function [30]. Genes with threshold value of P < 0.05 and
ip
|log2FoldChange| >2 were regarded as DEGs.
cr
Construction of PPI network
us
an
In this section, possible functional associations between DEGs were investigated
scale [31]. STRING could assess and integrate DEGs to obtain a confidence score for
Cytoscape [32], a free software package for visualizing, modeling and analyzing the
ce
connectivity helps identify portions of the network that may play interesting roles.
Research has revealed that topological centrality is effective for identifying essential
analysis (degree) index. The degree quantifies the local topology of each gene by
summing up the number of its adjacent genes [35]. It gives a simple count of the
number of interactions in a given node. The genes at the top of the degree distribution
(≥ 95% quantile) were defined as hub genes in the significantly perturbed networks.
t
ip
The degree D (v) of a node v was defined as
cr
D (v ) a vj
j
us
The relationship between the number of genes and degree distribution was also
studied. As the PPI networks in general are modular and scale-free, a fitting
an
coefficient R2 of the power-law 𝑌 = 𝑎𝑋 𝑏 of the objective networks was then
M
detected, which meant that the networks had power-law (or scale-free) degree
distributions [36,37]. The Network Analyzer 2.7 plugin in Cytoscape 3.1.0 was used
ed
Statistical analysis
ce
The results were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS,
Ac
Chicago, IL, USA) [38]. The data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation. One
way ANOVA was then implemented to compare the differences between the groups.
In addition, 0.01 < P < 0.05 was considered to be a statistically significant difference,
In preliminary experiments, it was found that there was an obvious change in the
physical status and amount of activity in mice 24 days after inoculation, including
anorexia, hypokinesis and subcutaneous tumor growth. The body weight decreased
t
rapidly on the 24th day, and the mice entered into a state of cachexia, hence they were
ip
treated from Day 24 for 7 days. Right from the time they were inoculated to 24 days
cr
later, the food and water intake of the mice decreased persistently, and no significant
us
differences in body weight were observed in all three groups. Post-treatment, in the
an
BJOE group, the body weight, and food and water intake in mice showed no
M
significant decline, while that in the control group decreased markedly. In the IND
groups, the decrease in body weight was similar to the control group. There was an
ed
obvious increase in food intake and water intake showed no significant decline. It was
pt
apparent that body weight improved more in the group on BJOE than those in the
ce
BJOE inhibited tumor growth and increased survival time in mice with cachexia.
After treatment, the tumor growth rate in mice was slower, and tumor weight and
pulmonary metastases were significantly less in the BJOE group as compared to the
control group. Also the anti-tumor rate was 22.5% and pulmonary metastasis
inhibition rate was 39.75% on day 7, and the survival time in mice was significantly
longer. Whereas, there was no obvious difference in tumor growth rate in the IND
group as compared to those from the control group. The average tumor weight was
more, pulmonary metastasis inhibition rate was 13.25% on day 7, and the survival
time in mice was significantly longer. On comparing BJOE and IND, there was a
more marked effect of BJOE on survival time extension, tumor growth rate and
t
ip
BJOE lowered TNF- α and IL-6 in mice with cachexia.
cr
us
Cytokines including TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1a, IL-1b, interferon-c, and IL-6 play an
an
important role in the occurrence and development of cancer cachexia [39]. In this
experiment, both TNF-α and IL-6 in mice decreased significantly in the BJOE group
M
than in the control group. The effects of IND were similar to BJOE; however,
ed
cytokine decrease was greater in mice treated with BJOE than with IND (Table.1).
pt
The correlation between average signals for BJOE treatment to normal controls was
Ac
similar to that of IND treatment in normal controls (Figure.2 & 3). Totally, 555 and
519 DEGs were identified for BJOE and IND groups, respectively, considering P <
0.05 and |log2FoldChange| >2. To explore the significance of gene interactions among
DEGs, PPI networks were constructed on the basis of the STRING database.
Simultaneously, the degree of distribution for all genes mapped to the PPI network
was displayed, as shown in Figure 4. There were 172 nodes and 251 edges (Figure 5)
in the BJOE group. Network analysis showed that the PPI network presented
where a = 67.05, b = -1.107) with the fitting coefficients R2 (R2 = 0.9985). A total of
138 DEGs were mapped to PPI networks in the IND group, with 177 resultant
interactions (Figure 6). The degree of distribution of PPI network in the IND group
0.9868. These indicated that the two PPI networks possessed properties of small
world network.
t
ip
A degree centrality analysis was conducted, and 7 hub genes (Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3,
cr
Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and Tfb1m) for the BJOE group and 6 hub genes (Bcl2, Frk,
Nmd3, Eps15, Myh2 and Nhp2l1) for the IND group were obtained. Interestingly,
us
three common hub genes were found for the two groups – Nmd3, Bcl2, and Nhp2l1,
an
which might play more important roles in Lewis lung carcinoma in mice than other
genes, and have greater potential to be prognostic markers of this tumor target
M
treatment.
ed
Discussion
pt
ce
In this study, it was found that BJOE was effective in treating lung cancer cachexia.
weight, tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis inhibition, and survival extension
time compared to IND, which is commonly used in clinical practice. The function was
achieved through down-regulating the level of TNF-α and IL-6, and regulating the
relevant target genes in the downstream pathway. In this experiment, body weight,
food and water intake, tumor growth (tumor weight and tumor volume), pulmonary
metastasis, and survival time were compared in mice treated by BJOE, IND and
normal saline solution. BJOE significantly slowed down weight loss and tumor
growth, increased food and water intake, inhibited pulmonary metastasis, and
IND is commonly used to treat patients with cancer. Ikawa et. al. had
(2), which is considered as a biomarker for colorectal cancer [40]. Also IND
t
ip
decreased protein degradation by acting on ubiquitin-dependent proteases, reduced the
cr
levels of TNF-α and IL6, and alleviated muscle wasting in animals with cancer [41].
us
A clinical study of patients with cancer cachexia indicated that IND suppressed
which limited its application in clinical treatment. It has been demonstrated that BJOE
has significant use in the treatment of lung cancer, with prominent benefits and lesser
pt
adverse effects [43]. It could also induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via reactive
ce
but it has not been used so far for treatment of lung cancer cachexia. In this study, the
treatment effects of BJOE and IND on lung cancer cachexia in mice was compared,
and better results were observed in the group on BJOE as compared to those on IND.
the therapeutic strategy for attenuating cachexia progression through target adipose,
skeletal muscle, gut, and liver tissue. All of these factors affect patient recovery from
cachexia. TNF-α has a direct catabolic effect on skeletal muscles and causes muscle
t
ip
resulting in decrease in protein, lipid and glycogen synthesis in cancer cachexia
cr
[46,47]. In this study, BJOE obviously decreased TNF-α and IL-6 levels, thus
us
illustrating that BJOE could decrease cancer cachexia to some extent, based on the
regulation and some important signal transmission. In order to further explore the
ed
treatment mechanism of BJOE for lung cancer cachexia, the influence of BJOE on
genes was analyzed, based on appropriate gene chips. In this study, 7 hub genes
pt
(Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3, Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and Tfb1m) were found. Interestingly, Nmd3,
ce
Bcl2, and Nhp2l1 were also found in the IND treatment group, which meant that they
Ac
were more important than other hub genes in the treatment of lung cancer cachexia.
from the nucleus, and binds to nascent 60S subunits while exporting receptor
through the nuclear pore complex [48]. Moreover, Crm1 and Nmd3 have complex
functions in pathways that couple rRNA synthetic and processing engines, and the
dysregulated functions may have been responsible for the onset of cancer [49]. A
mRNA turnover [50]. Bcl2 (B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2) family proteins are key
t
ip
signals, mediating cell death of caspase-dependent and caspase-independent [52,53]
cr
cell structures. Stolz et al reported that induction of mitochondrial apoptosis is
us
required in the involvement of BCL-2 [54]. Furthermore, overexpression of Bcl2
survivin and Bcl2 may serve as a biomarker for predicting prognosis of lung cancer
[58]. Therefore, Bcl2 played a significant role in lung cancer and might be a potential
pt
biomarker for lung cancer target therapy. Nhp2l1 (NHP 2-like protein 1, fibrillarin)
ce
and pseudouridylation reaction, as the core member of the box C/D small nucleolar
defects and stabilizing skeletal muscle development [60]. It thus has close relation
with weight loss in cancer cachexia. Also some new genes (Ftsj3, Rhob, Cct2 and
Tfb1m) were discovered in the BJOE group but not in the IND group, suggesting that
responsible for these key genes, but further study needs be carried out to verify this
inference.
Conclusions
t
In conclusion, BJOE alleviated lung cancer cachexia and inhibited the tumor. The
ip
mechanism involved down-regulating inflammatory cytokines and regulating the
cr
expression of the relevant genes, mainly Nmd3, Bcl2, Ftsj3, Rhob, Nhp2l1, Cct2 and
us
Tfb1m. This finding provides new insights into treatment of lung cancer cachexia.
an
Acknowledgments
M
We thank colleagues affiliated with our laboratory for their technical assistance and
ed
helpful comments.
pt
All mouse protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee in the Animal
Reference
t
vitamins, minerals, proteins, and other supplements for the treatment of cachexia
ip
in cancer: a European Palliative Care Research Centre cachexia project. J
Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle.2017;8(1):25-39.
cr
2. Arthur ST, Van Doren BA, Roy D, et al. Cachexia among US cancer patients. J
Med Econ.2016;19(9):874-880.
us
3. Tisdale MJ. Cancer cachexia. Langenbecks Arch Surg.2004;389(4):299-305.
4. Takayama K, Atagi S, Imamura F, et al. Quality of life and survival survey of
cancer cachexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients-Japan nutrition
an
and QOL survey in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer study.
Support Care Cancer.2016;24(8):3473-3480.
5. Tan BH, Fearon KC. Cachexia: prevalence and impact in medicine. Curr Opin
M
8. Hsiao WL, Liu L. The role of traditional Chinese herbal medicines in cancer
therapy—from TCM theory to mechanistic insights. Planta
ce
Med.2010;76(11):1118-1131.
9. Qi F, Li A, Inagaki Y, et al. Chinese herbal medicines as adjuvant treatment
Ac
t
18. Ye H, Liu X, Sun J, et al. Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of LHRHa-targeted
ip
brucea javanica oil liposomes for ovarian cancer. BMC
cancer.2016;16(1):831-843.
cr
19. Kim JA, Lau EK, Pan L, et al. NF-kappaB inhibitors from Brucea javanica
exhibiting intracellular effects on reactive oxygen species. Anticancer
us
Res.2010;30(9):3295-3300.
20. Chen SZ, Qiu ZG. Combined treatment with GH, insulin, and indomethacin
alleviates cancer cachexia in a mouse model. J Endocrinol.2011;208(2):131-136.
an
21. Zhou W, Jiang ZW, Tian J, et al. Role of NF-kappaB and cytokine in
experimental cancer cachexia. World J Gastroenterol.2003;9(7):1567-1570.
22. Yue Y, Yang Y, Shi L, et al. Suppression of human hepatocellular cancer cell
M
to reduce tumor cell adhesion and metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells
in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2006;132(2):297-303.
ce
26. Pepper SD, Saunders EK, Edwards LE, et al. The utility of MAS5 expression
summary and detection call algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics.2007;8:273-284.
27. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip
probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res.2003;31(4):e15-e22.
28. Lee J, Kim D-W. Efficient multivariate feature filter using conditional mutual
information. Electron Lett.2012;48(3):161-162.
29. Smyth GK. Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Bioinformatics and
computational biology solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer: 2005; pp
397-420.
30. Diboun I, Wernisch L, Orengo CA, et al. Microarray analysis after RNA
amplification can detect pronounced differences in gene expression using limma.
BMC genomics.2006;7(1):252-263.
31. Taboada B, Verde C, Merino E. High accuracy operon prediction method based
on STRING database scores. Nucleic Acids Res.2010;38(12):e130-e139.
32. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, et al. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data
integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics.2011;27(3):431-432.
33. Bader DA, Madduri K, editors. Madduri In Parallel algorithms for evaluating
centrality indices in real-world networks. Parallel Processing, 2006 Aug 14-18;
Columbus, USA.: ICPP 2006. International Conference on, IEEE Press; 2006. P.
539-550.
34. Prifti E, Zucker J-D, Clément K, et al. Interactional and functional centrality in
transcriptional co-expression networks. Bioinformatics.2010;26(24):3083-3089.
35. Haythornthwaite C. Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the
t
study of information exchange. Library & information science
ip
research.1996;18(4):323-342.
36. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, et al. Hierarchical organization of modularity
cr
in metabolic networks. Science.2002;297(5586):1551-1555.
37. Rifai N, Ridker PM. Proposed cardiovascular risk assessment algorithm using
us
high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and lipid screening. Clin
Chem.2001;47(1):28-30.
38. Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 12 and 13: a guide
an
for social scientists. London (LON): Psychology Press; 2005.
39. Bonetto A, Aydogdu T, Kunzevitzky N, et al. STAT3 activation in skeletal muscle
links muscle wasting and the acute phase response in cancer cachexia. PLoS
M
One.2011;6(7):e22538-e22554.
40. Ikawa Y, Fujino H, Otake S, et al. Indomethacin antagonizes EP(2) prostanoid
receptor activation in LS174T human colon cancer cells. Eur J
ed
Pharmacol.2012;680(1-3):16-21.
41. Zhou W, Jiang Z-W, Tian J, et al. Role of NF-kappaB and cytokine in
experimental cancer cachexia. World J Gastroenterol.2003;9(7):1567-1570.
pt
43.
Bruceolic Oil Emulsion in Treating Thoracic Liquid after Lobectomy of Lung
Cancer]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine.2008;8(8):1483-1491.Chinese.
44. Wang D, Qu X, Zhuang X, et al. Seed Oil of Brucea javanica Induces Cell Cycle
Arrest and Apoptosis via Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Mitochondrial
Dysfunction in Human Lung Cancer Cells. Nutr Cancer.2016;68(8):1394-1403.
45. Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Yun J, et al. Pathophysiological role of hormones and cytokines
in cancer cachexia. J Korean Med Sci.2012;27(2):128-134.
46. Narsale AA, Carson JA. Role of interleukin-6 in cachexia: therapeutic
implications. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care.2014;8(4):321-327.
47. Patel HJ, Patel BM. TNF-alpha and cancer cachexia: Molecular insights and
clinical implications. Life Sci.2017;170:56-63.
48. Sengupta J, Bussiere C, Pallesen J, et al. Characterization of the nuclear export
adaptor protein Nmd3 in association with the 60S ribosomal subunit. J Cell
Biol.2010;189(7):1079-1086.
49. Bai B, Moore HM, Laiho M. CRM1 and its ribosome export adaptor NMD3
localize to the nucleolus and affect rRNA synthesis. Nucleus.2013;4(4):315-325.
50. Buhlmann M, Walrad P, Rico E, et al. NMD3 regulates both mRNA and rRNA
nuclear export in African trypanosomes via an XPOI-linked pathway. Nucleic
Acids Res.2015;43(9):4491-4504.
51. Antonsson B. Bax and other pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family" killer-proteins" and their
victim the mitochondrion. Cell Tissue Res.2001;306(3):347-361.
52. Mehmeti I, Lenzen S, Lortz S. Modulation of Bcl-2-related protein expression in
t
pancreatic beta cells by pro-inflammatory cytokines and its dependence on the
ip
antioxidative defense status. Mol Cell Endocrinol.2011;332(1):88-96.
53. Santos AO, Pereira JP, Pedroso de Lima MC, et al. In vitro modulation of Bcl-2
cr
levels in small cell lung cancer cells: effects on cell viability. Braz J Med Biol
Res.2010;43(10):1001-1009.
us
54. Stolz C, Hess G, Hähnel PS, et al. Targeting Bcl-2 family proteins modulates the
sensitivity of B-cell lymphoma to rituximab-induced apoptosis.
Blood.2008;112(8):3312-3321.
an
55. Sun SY, Yue P, Zhou JY, et al. Overexpression of BCL2 blocks TNF-related
apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun.2001;280(3):788-797.
M
56. Anagnostou VK, Lowery FJ, Zolota V, et al. High expression of BCL-2 predicts
favorable outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients with non squamous
histology. BMC cancer.2010;10(1):186-196.
ed
58. Gao Q, Yang S, Kang M-Q. Influence of survivin and Bcl-2 expression on the
biological behavior of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Med
ce
Rep.2012;5(6):1409-1414.
59. Morimoto M, Boerkoel CF. The role of nuclear bodies in gene expression and
Ac
disease. Biology.2013;2(3):976-1033.
60. Johnson AN, Mokalled MH, Valera JM, et al. Post-transcriptional regulation of
myotube elongation and myogenesis by Hoi Polloi.
Development.2013;140(17):3645-3656.
Table
Figures
Figure legends
Figure 1 Changes in body weight, food and water intake, tumor volume in
tumor-bearing mice. (A) body weight, (B) food intake, (C) water intake, and (D)
t
ip
tumor volume
cr
Figure 2 Fluorescently-labeled scan images of chips for control group (A), Brucea
us
javanica oil emulsion group (B) and Indometacin group(C).
an
Figure 3 Average signal strength for gene expression profile. A: Brucea javanica oil
emulsion treatment vs. normal controls (BJOE group); B: Indometacin treatment vs.
M
Figure 4 Distribution of genes in the PPI networks. A: Brucea javanica oil emulsion
treatment vs. normal controls (BJOE group); B: Indometacin treatment vs. normal
pt
Figure 5 PPI networks for Brucea javanica oil emulsion treatment vs. normal controls.
Ac
Nodes were genes and edges were the interactions among genes. The roseo nodes
Figure 6 PPI networks for Indometacin treatment vs. normal controls. Nodes were
genes and edges were the interactions among genes. The roseo nodes represented hub
t
ip
NLM 11.85±3.18 7.14±2.68* 10.28±2.63
cr
LMIR, % 0 39.75 13.25
AR, NLM, LMIR, were abbreviations of anti-tumor rate, number of lung metastasis
and lung metastasis inhibition rate respectively. * P < 0.05 significantly different
ed