1. The document discusses the problem of suffering and addresses existential atheism and its claim that God does not exist.
2. It presents Thomas Aquinas' view that suffering is a privation of goodness, as the world contains imperfections due to its changing nature. Eliminating suffering could disrupt the world order.
3. The document also discusses human freedom and morality, explaining that people are moral beings who act through reason and will. It covers various philosophical approaches to ethics like deontology and consequentialism.
1. The document discusses the problem of suffering and addresses existential atheism and its claim that God does not exist.
2. It presents Thomas Aquinas' view that suffering is a privation of goodness, as the world contains imperfections due to its changing nature. Eliminating suffering could disrupt the world order.
3. The document also discusses human freedom and morality, explaining that people are moral beings who act through reason and will. It covers various philosophical approaches to ethics like deontology and consequentialism.
1. The document discusses the problem of suffering and addresses existential atheism and its claim that God does not exist.
2. It presents Thomas Aquinas' view that suffering is a privation of goodness, as the world contains imperfections due to its changing nature. Eliminating suffering could disrupt the world order.
3. The document also discusses human freedom and morality, explaining that people are moral beings who act through reason and will. It covers various philosophical approaches to ethics like deontology and consequentialism.
1. The document discusses the problem of suffering and addresses existential atheism and its claim that God does not exist.
2. It presents Thomas Aquinas' view that suffering is a privation of goodness, as the world contains imperfections due to its changing nature. Eliminating suffering could disrupt the world order.
3. The document also discusses human freedom and morality, explaining that people are moral beings who act through reason and will. It covers various philosophical approaches to ethics like deontology and consequentialism.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
Philosophy Reviewer
“EXISTENCE PRECEDES ESSENCE.”
The Human Person and the Problem of Suffering THE REVOLT OF EXISTENTIAL ATHEISM Two Types of Evil: To overcome anxiety and despair, we must become a Physical evil-Consequences of natural single individual by events or phenomenon. constantly choosing to be Moral evil -evil due to man’s abuse of ourselves and not somebody freedom. else.” Being the sovereign maker of himself, man has Attributes of God: the power to become - Omnipotent (all-powerful), someone because there is no Why can’t He control the evil in the world? God who gives purpose to - Benevolent (Good or Loving) the universe. Why is He indifferent to man? THE REVOLT OF EXISTENTIAL ATHEISM - Omniscient (All-knowing) Existential Atheism of Sartre Why can’t he prevent evil from happening? declares that every truth is relative, subjective, and Atheism dependent. If the only thing From Greek ‘A’ – ‘not’ and Theos – that matters is the self, ‘God’ humans are not bound to be The doctrine of disbelief in a formed by any conventions. supreme being. RESPONSE TO THE PHENOMENON OF Existentialism SUFFERING AND THE DISTORTION OF “Existentialism’s first move is to EXISTENTIAL ATHEISM make every man aware of what he is One way to characterize and to make the full responsibility of suffering is to see it as evil. his existence rest on him because of Thomas Aquinas would say man’s anxiety, the existential that evil is a privation of movement had desired for the good. In other words, evil is stable human condition.” In other an absence. Whatever lacks words, the existential attitude is a goodness is evil. We suffer straightforward reaction against the because there is a lack. swift dehumanization of man, 1. The problem of suffering does not brought by the phenomenon of constitute a disproof of God’s existence. angst. - WORLD WAR II THE REVOLT OF EXISTENTIAL ATHEISM - In the light of Thomas Aquinas, all created “Atheistic existentialism, there is at least beings are changing. The world is created so one being in whom existence precedes it is subject to change. essence, man. -Jean-Paul Sartre Accordingly, whatever is in motion entails prepared for us. The world is not our imperfection. Our finite cosmos is in a state home. This imperfect cosmos is nothing of motion so it follows that it is in a state of compared to the paradise of God. imperfection. 2. God is like a surgeon who operates on us Man as a Moral Being and knows best how to heal us. Our goal is to realize that all actions have consequences. Man is not just a rational –C.S. Lewis being that acts according to reason. Man, -The entire surgical procedure is painful but also acts according to his will and intellect. we will be all right at the end. If God Therefore, every human person is a moral stopped in the middle of the surgery then being. all of the pain that we bear are worthless. HUMAN ACTS VS ACTS OF MAN 3. The consequences of eliminating the SOURCES OF MORALITY phenomenon of sufferings in the world. • Moral Object -It is a great misleading notion that if suffering in the world is eliminated, the only • Intention fruit will be good. But we must bear in our • Circumstance mind that suffering is not completely bad at all. Besides, if God will remove all the pains 1. Moral Object (what) and sufferings in this world, it is more – suggest whether an action is directed chaotic. towards good. 4. If the world is freed from all physical evil Makabubuti ba yan? and if all human suffering will be eliminated, and if God created a perfect 2. Intention (why) world, man will be entering into the realm – determines by its end and indicates of the self a perfect total universe. the purpose pursued in the action. -Our attitude in questioning the existence of Bakit mo gagawin? God whenever we experience human anxiety and suffering is just an attitude to 3. Circumstance (who, where, when, bend reality into our own. and how) There are deeper and justified reasons why - The circumstances, including the suffering exists. The problem is that we are consequences, are secondary elements too blind so we cannot see. It is true that of a moral act. suffering exists and has dreadfully affected the whole human race. But we are called APPROACHES TO MORALITY once more to climb the valley of life and to see the perfect landscape that God has “Deontological Ethics” • Proportionalism Δεον (Deon) = obligation/duty Man as a moral and free being acts according to his intellect and will. Our λογος (logos) = speaking/study precious freedom must not be understood KANT’S MORAL PHILOSOPHY according to what we want. It should not be wasted but be considered a wonderful gift • Act only in such a way that you that must be taken care of. would want your actions to become a universal law, applicable to everyone in a similar situation. PHILOSOPHY AND THE CONCEPT OF • Act in such a way that you always FREEDOM treat humanity (whether oneself or BAKIT MASARAP ANG BAWAL? others), as both the means of an action, but also as an end. BAWAL FREEDOM?
SOURCES OF MORALITY “For the sake of good.” “For the sake of
• Divine Command Theory: deprivation.” • Natural Rights Theory FREEDOM INVOLVES HUMAN ACTS • Contractarian Ethics • Freedom is unique in every human person as a rational and moral • Pluralistic Deontology being. • Consequentialism INTELLECT + WILL = FREEDOM • Utilitarianism ARISTOTLE ON VOLUNTARINESS • Hedonism • “Men are controlling principles and • Egoism causes of contingent effects. “ • Asceticism, • In this light, he considers man as a principle and controller and that • Altruism what is caused from the human • Virtue Ethics person is due to his choice, thus making the very choice voluntary. • Eudaimonism EPICUREAN DETERMINISM • Ethics of Care • “PLEASURE is the beginning and end • Epicureanism of a blessed life.” • Stoicism • Pleasure is our starting point when • Subjectivism whenever we choose or avoid anything and it is this, we make our inclined to the attainment of the aim, the factor considered in making good of the very person. choices therefore lies in the principle • There exist in the world other good, of what is the most pleasurable. but they are but universals. EXISTENTIALIST FREEDOM OF SARTRE However, the Good itself is God and AND MERLEAU-PONTY knowledge of God is attainable only in the beatific vision after death. • As Sartre presents that “man is an unfinished project” who has the • Therefore, we will voluntarily the inescapable ability to choose who he Good in the aid of God’s knowledge or she wants to be. that is to will the Good in the Good itself. • freedom means human autonomy. In a meaningless cosmos, man is LAW condemned to freedom because he Lt. LEX – LIGARE – means is the only creature who is self- surpassing. “Man is nothing but “To bind” what he makes of himself.” “an ordinance of reason, made and • For Merleau-Ponty, “the real promulgated by those who are in choice is that of whole character and charge of welfare of the community, our manner of being in the world.” to achieve the common good.” Freedom, therefore, is dependent KINDS OF LAW on our situation. ETERNAL LAW • To Choose in the Light of Divine Knowledge or Freedom as Guided by NATURAL LAW God DIVINE LAW AUGUSTINE ON FREE WILL HUMAN LAW • For Augustine, we acknowledge that ETERNAL LAW God is the creator and He is omniscient in the same light that we Law which proved that the whole are free with choices. community of the universe is govern by Divine reason • Therefore, the two are to be embraced in faith: “God’s NATURAL LAW omniscience for right belief and our The rational creature’s participation choice for right life. of the Eternal Law. AQUINAS ON FREE WILL DIVINE LAW • In his thought, the will, understood in the thought of human nature is Derived from eternal law as it appears historically to humans, especially through revelation, i.e., when it appears to human beings as divine commands. HUMAN LAW “positive law”, the laws actually enacted and put in force in our human communities. Free choice is an activity that involves both our intellectual and volitional capacities, as it consists in both judgement and active commitment
Phillip Honenberger (Eds.) - Naturalism and Philosophical Anthropology - Nature, Life, and The Human Between Transcendental and Empirical Perspectives (2015, Palgrave Macmillan UK) PDF