Wealth & Profit Maximization
Wealth & Profit Maximization
Subject
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Introduction
3. Profit Maximization
3.1.Meaning
3.2.Arguments in Favour
3.3.Limitations
4. Shareholder’s Wealth Maximization(SWM)
4.1.Meaning
1. Learning Outcomes
3.1. Meaning
In the traditional phase, profit maximization was pointed out to be the important objective
of financial management. Main motive of business concern is to earn profit. It can be said
that most businesses function mainly for the purpose of earning profits. Profit is the
yardstick by which efficiency of business operations can be measured. Profit
maximization as objective of financial management means that all financial decisions in a
firm are guided by the criteria of amount of profits that the financial decision generates or
saves. Unprofitable projects and investment alternatives would be rejected. If sufficient
funds are not available to finance all profitable investment projects then those with
highest profits would be selected.
3.3. Limitations
4.1. Meaning
é C C2 C3 Cn ù
NPV = ê 1 + + +L+ - C0
ë (1 + k ) (1 + k ) (1 + k )
2 3
(1 + k ) n úû
n
Ct
NPV = å - C0
t =1 (1 + k )
t
Where:
n = life of the project in years.
C1, C2, C3, ….. Cn are cash inflows of years 1,2,3, … n.
Decision Rule:
All projects with positive NPV i.e., NPV > 0 would be accepted because a positive NPV
means that the project would increase shareholder’s wealth. For example, if NPV of a
project is + Rs.50,000 it implies that undertaking the project would increase shareholder’s
wealth by Rs.50,000.
When the projects are mutually exclusive then the project with highest NPV should be
selected.Further, in case there are several projects with positive NPV and there is a
constraint of fundsthe projects may be ranked from highest NPV to lowest NPV and
selected in that order so as to maximise shareholder’s wealth.
(i) Wealth maximization aims to maximise the value of investments or wealth of the
shareholders. Hence is considered superior to profit maximization.
(ii) It is based on the concept of Cash Flows, which is precise and unambiguous
unlike
profit. Here cash inflow is treated as benefit and cash outflow as cost associated
with
a particular decision.
(iii) Wealth maximization considers the timing of occurrence of benefits (cash
inflows)
and costs (cash outflows). It thus takes into account the time value of money.
(iv) Wealth maximization also considers the risk associated with occurrence of cash
flows.
(v) Wealth maximization ensures that funds of a company are allocated to those uses
which generate maximum value or worth to the shareholders.
(vi) Shareholder’s wealth maximization also upholds the economic welfare of the
society
as a whole by ensuring efficient allocation of society’s scarce capital
resources.
4.3. Criticism
agency problem.
(iii) Wealth maximization is criticised on the grounds that it seeks to maximise only
shareholder’s wealth and is not concerned about welfare of other important
stakeholders of the business such as management, creditors, employees, suppliers,
distributors, customers.
Stakeholder in a company is anyone who has an interest in the company, can influence
the fortunes of the company or is itself influenced by the happenings related to the
company. Shareholders, management, creditors, employees and employee unions,
suppliers, distributors, consumers and consumer groups, government and its agencies,
local people living in close proximity to the business, environment groups and society at
large are the main stakeholders of a company. Each of these groups are important for the
functioning of the business. Thus, a finance manager cannot seek to maximise the
interests of any one group and ignore the needs of others. Because the financial resources
at the disposal of finance manager are limited he/she cannot maximise the benefits to
every stakeholders. Also even if he/she had enough financial resources then also it would
not have been possible because often the interests of various stakeholders are in conflict
with each other.
For example: (1) While shareholders would want more percentage of after tax profits to
be distributed as dividends, the managers would want to retain more percentage of after
tax profits in the business to meet future growth needs.
(2) Creditors would want firm to undertake lower risk projects so that their claims can be
met but shareholders would want firm to undertake more risky projects so that they can
earn more returns.
(3) Suppliers, distributors and employees would want higher payments, margins and
salary respectively which would increase cost and hence price of the product but
customers would want lower prices.
EPS is obtained by deducting Preference share dividend from Net Income after tax and
dividing by average outstanding equity shares. It gives earning per equity share.
Earning Per Share (EPS) = Net Income after Tax – Dividend On Preference Shares
Average Outstanding Equity Shares
In this approach,finance manager takes all actions with an aim to maximize earnings per
share. Impact of all decision alternatives on EPS is seen. Only those investment projects
are selected which increase EPS. All alternative courses of action which decrease EPS are
not undertaken.This objective of financial management implies that all financial
management decisions, viz.,capital budgeting, capital structure, dividend and working
capital management policy decisions of a firm are concerned withmaximization of EPS.
Maximizing EPS does not imply maximization of shareholder’s wealth. The two concepts
are different. Maximization of EPS ignores time value of money and risk associated with
expected benefits. Also, market price of a company’s share is not directly related to EPS.
EPS can be one of the several factors influencing the market price of a company’s share.
5.4.Maximization of Sales
6. Summary