Module 3
Module 3
Learning Outcome:
At the end of this module, you should be able to take an informed stand/ position on the 3
issues on development.
Introduction:
Each of us has his/her own informal way of looking at our own and other people’s
development. These paradigms of human development while obviously lacking in scholastic vigor,
provide us with a conceptual framework for understanding ourselves and others. Scholars have come up
with their own models of human development. Back up with solid research, they take stand on issues of
human development.
Activity:
1. Who is pro-nature? Or Pro-nurture? Are there additional reasons you can give in favor of
nature/nurture? Why?
2. How about continuity? Discontinuity? Can you give additional arguments to defend
continuity/discontinuity? Who are between continuity and discontinuity? Why?
3. Who claims stability is more correct than change? Change is more correct than stability?
Abstraction:
The issues presented can be translated into questions that have sparked animated debate
among developmentalists. Are girls less likely to do well in math because of their “feminine” nature or
because of society’s “masculine” bias? How extensively can the elderly be trained to reason more
effectively? How much, if at all, does our memory decline in old age? Can techniques be used to prevent
or reduce the decline? For children who experienced a world of poverty, neglect by parents, and poor
schooling in childhood, can enrich experiences in adolescence, remove the ‘deficits’ that they
encountered earlier in their development ( Santrocks, 2002)? Each one of you has your own
explanations for your stand on the developmental issues. What is the right answer? Up to this time, the
debate continuous. Researchers are on-going. But let me tell you the most lifespan developmentalists
recognize that extreme positions on these issues are unwise. Development is not all nature or all
nurture, not all continuity or discontinuity and not all stability or all change (Lerner, 1998 as quoted by
Santrocks 2002) Both nature and nurture, continuity and discontinuity, stability and change
characterized our life span development. The key to development is the interaction of nature and
nurture rather than either factor alone (Rutter,2001 as quoted by Santrock, 2002). In other words, it is a
matter of “both-and” not “either-or”. The message of this quote is crystal clear. “The interaction of
heredity and environment is so extensive that to ask which is more important, nature or nurture, is
like asking which is more important to a rectangle, height or width. -William Greenough.
To summarize, both genes and environment are necessary for a person even to exist. Without
genes, there is no person, without environment there is no person (Scarr and Weinberg, 1980, quoted
by Santrock, 2002). Heredity and environment operate together or cooperate and interact- to produce a
person’s intelligence, temperament, height, weight, ability to read and so on.
If heredity and environment interact, which one has a greater influence or contribution,
heredity, or environment? The relative contributions of heredity and environment are not additive. So,
we can’t say 50% is a contribution of heredity and 50% of environment. Neither it is correct to say that
full genetic expression happens once, around conception or birth, after which we take our genetic legacy
into the world to see how far it gets us. Genes produce proteins throughout the lifespan, in many
different environments. Or they don’t produce these proteins depending on how harsh or nourishing
those environments are.(Santrock, 2002)
Application:
Let’s find out where you can apply what you learned from the discussion of this developmental
issues.
As far as our discussions are concerned, which statement is correct, and which one is wrong? Put a
check (/)before the correct statement and mark (x) the wrong one. If you mark a statement x, explain
why.
Research
1. Read the published book The Nurture Assumption, by Judith Harris (1998).
2. State in not more than 1 paragraph the thesis of Judith Harris book.
3. A. Watch “Lonely one” in your You Tube. Only children: Debunking the Myths About Single
children.
B. In 1896 Granville Stanley hall described only children as “deficient on the social side”, “petted”,
“ Humored”, “ indulged”, and “ spoiled”. Today, many consider this a MYTH-WHAT DO YOU
THINK?
For related articles, refer to TIME magazine, July 19, 2020, issue. State in not more than 10
sentences the position expressed in the You tube and in the Time magazine.
4. Read on fetal origin.