GASM
GASM
GASM
Description of Test: Qik CPT is a computerized visual continuous performance test developed for assessing
attention and impulse control. The EEG Expert Report on Qik CPT is specifically intended for use by
neurofeedback clinicians for assessment and monitoring the effects of EEG training. A simple visual target or
non-target is presented once every two seconds. During the 21-minute test, the subject must press a button to
respond to each target and not press for each non-target.
Results Summary:
80 Performance Index 60 80
^
100 120 140
55 Accuracy Index
^
60 80 100 120 140
80 Speed of Response
| 88
Consistency of Response 55 Sustained Attention
| 55
Impulse Control
(Omission Errors + Outliers) (Commission + Anticipatory Errors)
25.7% Correct Response Rate male 6.0
Performance Index reflects speed and consistency of response, which are continuous variables.
Accuracy Index reflects sustained attention and impulse control, which involve discrete errors.
Sustained Attention is determined by omission errors and outliers.
Impulse Control is determined by commission errors and anticipatory errors.
All indices are presented as standard scores. The range of scores is limited from 55 to 145.
Results are with reference to the 2014 population-based QIKnorm for the specific age and gender group.
Scores significantly below average (<80) are printed in red. Scores significantly above average (>120) are
printed in green.
Equivalent Age is the hypothetical age for which the specific result would be normal; it is displayed only if the
calculation is mathematically possible and for ages up to 20
The symbol ">" is used to indicate a range of scores in cases of zero error, for which data resolution does not
allow greater precision in the assignment of scores.
Omission Errors occur when the subject does not respond correctly to a target
Outliers are correct responses with very long response times.
Commission Errors occur when the subject responds incorrectly to a non-target.
Response Time is the mean of all correct reaction times to a target.
Variability is the standard deviation of correct response times.
When the accuracy index is at its lowest score of 55, the clinician should also evaluate the
validity of the variability score. There could be a problem of insufficient sample size to yield
a valid number.
These matters will tend to be an issue only during the initial test. One would like to avoid
the situation in which the client is misled by wrongly inflated scores on reaction time and
variability at the outset. On retest, the impression might be given that scores have declined
when in fact the pre-test scores were simply inflated because they were unreliable.
Section 1 (periods 1 and 2) and section 3 (period 5) represent the target-infrequent or low-demand task.
Section 2 (periods 3 and 4) represents the target-frequent or high-demand task.
Anticipatory Responses occur within 240 milliseconds of any stimulus (target or non-target).
Multiple Responses reflect more than one response to a stimulus
Scores significantly below average are printed in red. Scores significantly above average are printed in green.
EEG EXPERT REPORT ON QIK CPT - Visual Test Page 3
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 60000 120000 180000 240000
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
252000 312000 372000 432000 492000
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
504000 564000 624000 684000 744000
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
756000 816000 876000 936000 996000
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1008000 1068000 1128000 1188000 1248000
X-Axis for all charts: time into QIKtest in msec, with vertical gridlines of 1 minute
EEG EXPERT REPORT ON QIK CPT - Visual Test Page 4
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
Norms: the blue line represents a normal distribution of reaction times for this age and group: compare by form and position to your data in red. The light blue area represents 68.2%
(or ±1σ) of a normal distribution.
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 1140 1200
Response Time (msec)
EEG EXPERT REPORT ON QIK CPT - Visual Test Page 5
Pre-Post Graphs
145 145
130 130
115 115
100 100
88
85 85
80 80
70 70
55 55 55
55 55
PERFORMANCE INDEX Speed Consistency ACCURACY INDEX Sustained Impulse
of Response of Response Attention Control
300
290
280
270
260
250
240
230
220
210
29
200
190
180
66
170
160
150
140
130 142
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Mar. 24, 2022
Date of Test
EEG EXPERT REPORT ON QIK CPT - Visual Test Page 6
INTERPRETATION
I. TOTAL SCORES:
→ Omission Errors are significantly greater than average, indicating significant inattention (low
Sustained Attention)..
→ Commission Errors are significantly greater than average, indicating significant impulsivity (low
Impulse Control).
→ Response Time is significantly slower than average, indicating significantly slow response to
targets (low Speed of Response).
→ Outlier Errors are significantly greater than average, indicating significant inattention (low
Sustained Attention)..
→ Total Multiple Responses are excessive (>20). Multiple Responses occur when both buttons are
pressed together or when one button is pressed more than once per stimulus presentation (target or
non-target). Excessive Multiple Responses represent poor impulse control or poor understanding of
test instructions.
→ First section Omission Errors, Commission Errors, Response Time, Variability of Response
Time and Outliers standard scores are significantly below average.
This is the low demand task (target-infrequent condition). Poor scores in the first section indicate
difficulty maintaining attention and control in a boring situation.
→ Second section Omission Errors, Variability of Response Time and Outliers standard scores are
significantly below average.
This is the high demand task (target-frequent condition). Poor scores in the second section indicate
difficulty maintaining attention and control when performing under pressure.
→ Third section Omission Errors and Commission Errors standard scores are significantly below
average.
This is a repeat of the low demand task (target-infrequent condition). Poor scores in the third section
indicate difficulty maintaining attention and control with boredom and fatigue at the end of the test.
→ Below average standard scores in first and second sections indicate difficultly maintaining
attention and control both when bored and when pressured.
→Commission Errors and Response Time: Standard scores are significantly worse in the first section
than the second section. The first section is the low demand task (target-infrequent condition). Lower
scores in the first section indicate greater difficulty maintaining attention and control in a boring
situation.
→ Omission Errors Standard scores are significantly worse in the second section than the first
section.
The second section is the high demand task (target-frequent condition). Lower scores in the second
section indicate greater difficulty maintaining attention and control when performing under pressure.
→ First period Commission Errors, Response Time, Variability of Response Time and Outliers
standard scores are significantly below average.
→ Second period Omission Errors, Commission Errors, Response Time and Outliers standard
scores are significantly below average.
→ Third period Omission Errors, Commission Errors, Response Time, Variability of Response
Time and Outliers standard scores are significantly below average.
→ Fourth period Omission Errors standard scores are significantly below average.
→ Fifth period Omission Errors and Commission Errors standard scores are significantly below
average.
→ Standard scores for Omission Errors and Response Time are significantly worse in period 2
than period 1.
Period 2 is a continuation of the same low demand task as period 1. Scoring worse in period 2
indicates increasing difficulty maintaining attention and control under boring conditions.
→ Standard scores for Omission Errors are significantly worse in period 4 than period 3.
Period 4 is a continuation of the same high demand task as period 3. Scoring worse in period 4
indicates increasing difficulty maintaining attention and control under continued pressure.
→ Standard scores for Commission Errors, Variability of Response Time and Outliers are
significantly worse in period 1 than period 2.
Section 1 (periods 1 and 2) and section 3 (period 5) represent the target-infrequent or low-demand
task.
→ Standard scores for Response Time, Variability of Response Time and Outliers are significantly
worse in period 3 than period 4.
Periods 3 and 4 represent the same high demand (stimulus frequent) task. Scoring worse in period 3
indicates relative difficulty changing task compared to maintaining performance of a known task.
→ Post Commission Response Time is faster than average correct Response Time in period s 1
and 4.
A Post Commission Response Time is the response time immediately following a Commission Error.
People typically slow down after a Commission Error in order to be more careful. A faster response
time following a Commission Error might result from increased speed with increased attention after a
careless error. This might indicate that Commission Errors are resulting more from inattention than
from lack of impulse control. Look at the Response Time graphs to see which Commission Errors are
faster (impulsive) or slower (inattentive) than average.