(T.P.) Law of Property Project
(T.P.) Law of Property Project
(T.P.) Law of Property Project
FACULTY OF LAW
LAW OF PROPERTY
PROJECT
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
DR. AKSHAYA SHUKLA PAWAN THANVI
19BAL50041
B.A.LLB (9TH SEM)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Secondly, I Would Also Like To Thank My Parents And Friends and there
support, valuable information, time and guidance, which helped me in completing
this task through various stages and their encouragement without which this a
assignment would not be possible.
Thank you
PAWAN THANVI
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (JODHPUR), RAJASTHAN
SUIT NO. _____________ OF 2022
( SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXIX OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
RAM
SHRI...... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SHYAM
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
GOVIND
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
HARI
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
FACTS
I. That the plaintiff had sold a part of his land to the defendant in terms of a sale deed.
II. That the plaintiff had already directed and imposed a condition to the defendant to not to raise
construction on the land which would obstruct the passing of air and light on the plaintiff’s adjoining
land.
III. That if at any point of time. If the defendant raises the construction by breaching the any said
condition imposed, then the property shall go to a trust which was basically for the welfare of
plaintiff’s family.
IV. That the defendant i.e. Shyam sold the land to further another defendant i.e. Govind.
V. Defendant i.e. Govind constructed a mall there and was further sold it to another defendant i.e. Hari.
GROUND
I. That the defendant i.e., Govind had the knowledge of the condition imposed on the property, still no
objection was raised by him regarding that and still had purchased the property.
II. That the i.e. Govind had breached the condition knowingly and constructed mall on that land, which
violated the Easementary right of the plaintiff and his legal representative.
III. That the condition imposed by the plaintiff is valid and with the condition only theproperty was assigned
to defendant i.e., Govind.
IV. That the property is liable to go to trust made by the plaintiff for his family, as property can only be
accumulated in trust.
V. That the hon’ble court has the jurisdiction to entertain this suit because the construction held on the
property is invalid, as it violates the Easemenatery right of the plaintiff as par the condition imposed.
PRAYER:-
It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this hon’ble court may be pleased to,
Kindly:-
I. Pass a decree for an injunction or compensation in favors of the plaintiff and against his legal
representatives.
II. Pass order either the building or mall should be demolished.
III. Pass order that the property will go to trust.
IV. Pass order to award the cost of the suit in the favors of the plaintiff and against his legal
representatives.
V. Pass such other and further order(s) may be deemed fit and proper on the facts and in the
circumstances of this case agreed upon.
Verified at jodhpur on this 07th December,2022, that the contents of paras 1 to 5 of the plaint are
true to my knowledge derived from the records of the plaintiff maintained in his books, those of
paras 4&5 Of the part of grounds according to legal advice from my advocate which I believe to be
true.
PLAINTIFF
AFFIDAVIT
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE (JODHPUR), RAJASTHAN
SUIT NO. _____________ OF 2022
( SUIT UNDER ORDER XXXIX OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
RAM
SHRI...... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
SHYAM
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
GOVIND
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
HARI
SHRI…… DEFENDANT
I, …………… the deponent hereinabove do hereby solemnly affirm and state hereunder:
I. I say that I am the legal representative of the plaintiff and I am aware of the facts and circumstances
of the present suit based upon the records of the plaintiff maintained in his books and I am duly
authorized and competent to swear and file the present suit and affidavit.
II. I say that the accompanying suit has been drafted and filed by my counsel upon my instructions and
Contents of the same are true and correct.
III. I say that documents file along with plaint are true copies of originals.
DEPONENT