Management Reviews
Management Reviews
ISO 9001:2015
Control of Management Reviews
This procedure is the property of Your Company. It must not be reproduced in whole or in part or otherwise
disclosed without prior written consent.
The official controlled copy of this quality manual is the digitally signed PDF document held within our network
server and visible to all authorised users. All printed copies, and all electronic copies and versions, except the ones
described above, are considered uncontrolled copies which should be used for reference only.
Insert your company’s name or logo.
ISO 9001:2015
Control of Management Reviews
Approval
The signatures below certify that this management system procedure has been reviewed and accepted, and
demonstrates that the signatories are aware of all the requirements contained herein and are committed to
ensuring their provision.
Prepared by
Reviewed by
Approved by
Amendment Record
This procedure is reviewed to ensure its continuing relevance to the systems and process that it describes. A
record of contextual additions or omissions is given below:
Content
s
Contents________________________________________________________________________________________________________2
1.3 Responsibilities_______________________________________________________________________________________4
1.1.2 References
Standard Title Description
BS EN ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems Fundamentals and vocabulary
BS EN ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems Requirements
BS EN ISO 9004:2000 Quality management systems Guidelines for performance improvements
BS EN ISO 19011:2011 Auditing management systems Guidelines for auditing
1.3 Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the Quality Manager <amend as appropriate> to coordinate the management
review process, and to:
1. Prepare the management review agenda and minutes;
2. Ensure that management reviews are conducted at planned intervals;
3. Determine the review schedule and dates in coordination with participating attendees.
The Quality Manager <amend as appropriate> ensures that each management review includes:
1. Quality management system data, e.g. results of internal audits, KPIs, etc.;
2. Opportunities for improvement;
3. Monitoring of quality, environmental and health and safety objectives;
4. Results of the reporting and evaluation of the cost of poor quality.
Each Manager prepares a report to be circulated prior to the meeting, which summarizes our organization’s
performance. Representation at the review includes Top management, functional management, line
management, process owners, process champions, lead process users and action owners.
Minimum representation at the management review, includes: Top management, functional management,
line management, process owners, process champions, lead process users, and action owners appropriate to
the meeting agenda.
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4.2 Management Review Programme
The Management Review Programme is prepared and distributed by the Quality Manager in order to
coordinate the management review activities. Critical agenda items, such as; process performance, customer
feedback and monitoring and measuring results are reviewed monthly, while less critical agenda items, such
as reviewing the quality policy is undertaken less frequently.
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
1.4.3
1. Opportunities for improvement (see 10.1) e.g. read across and implementation of corrective action,
good practice, best practice, innovation, lessons learned etc.;
2. Changes to the QMS (see 6.3), e.g. policies, processes, procedures, methods, instructions;
3. Resource needs (see 7.1), e.g. people (number, roles, training), infrastructure (buildings, equipment,
systems, transport), working environment (physical and human factors), monitoring and measuring
equipment (availability, fit for purpose, maintained);
4. Identified risks (see 6.1 and 8.1.1), e.g. adding new risks at an organization or operational level to the
appropriate register(s) and the assignment of responsibility and treatment;
5. Documented evidence of the review, e.g. attendance, agenda, presentations, meeting minutes,
actions (list, owners, timescale), reports;
6. Retention of documented information of the review and communication of the relevant content
across the organization (see 7.4).
Management review output is documented in the minutes of the review meeting:
1. Action items are highlighted to ensure that they are easily identifiable;
2. Action items include the assignment of responsibility;
3. Action items include timeframe and allocation of resources for implementation.
Upon complete review of all inputs and generation of the outputs, management will determine the
continued suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system.
1. Objectives that have been achieved may either be upgraded to a higher performance level, or be
closed out to free resources for improvement in another area;
2. When objectives are not achieved on time, the review investigates and determines causes for failing
to achieve the objectives;
3. Depending on the nature of the objective and causes for failure to achieve it, top management may
decide to drop the objective, reduce its scope or level, reassign responsibilities and/or allocate
additional resources, or extend the due date for achieving the objective;
4. Any decisions regarding corporate objectives are recorded in the minutes of the review;
5. New objectives are established where it is necessary to improve performance in order to fulfil the
policies or other organizational goals or aspirations;
6. New objectives are documented in the minutes of the review;
7. The policies are changed when: the goals expressed in the policy have been achieved, or when
changes within or outside the company render the policy inadequate or inappropriate.
1.4.4
1.4.5
1.4.6 Corrective Action
Management review meeting action items are considered to be closed only after all associated corrective
actions have been completed, and followed-up by Quality Manager <amend as appropriate> in order to
verify the effectiveness of the corrective action.
When a formal corrective action is not taken in a timely manner, and a request for an extension has not been
received, the deficiency is brought to the attention of Top management.
Suitable &
Adequate
1. Agenda;
2. Status of actions from previous meeting; Effective
3. Changes in external and internal issues that & Aligned
are relevant to the quality management YES
system;
4. Information on the performance and
effectiveness of the QMS;
5. Customer satisfaction and feedback from NO
relevant interested parties;
6. The extent to which quality objectives have
Agree & Implement
been met; No System Changes
7. The relevance of the quality policy; System Changes
8. Process performance and conformity of
products and services;
9. Non-conformities and corrective actions;
10. Monitoring and measurement results;
11. Audit results;
12. Performance of external providers;
13. Adequacy of resources;
14. Effectiveness of actions taken to address risks
and opportunities;
15. Opportunities for improvement;
16. Supplier quality and delivery;
17. Review of action items.