Infrastructural Challenges and Student Academic Performance Evidence From A Developing Nation
Infrastructural Challenges and Student Academic Performance Evidence From A Developing Nation
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- A school's infrastructure reflects its achievements of the students in every possible way. In
curriculum and co-curricular activities. Using addition to the requirement of having an interest in education,
constructivism and production theory, the study one of the variables that can boost school performance is a
examined how school infrastructure affects academic school infrastructure that is adequately equipped [6]. A
achievement in four Ghanaian senior high schools. The considerable number of substandard school infrastructures in
study obtained data using interviews and questionnaires. rural, urban, and suburban regions constitute a hindrance
The survey revealed that schools required sports fields, related to students’ academic success [7], [8]. If education
music rooms, church halls, mosques, and theatres. The changes are to be successful, it is imperative that those with a
study found that schools required additional dorms and stake in the field advocate for innovative approaches to both
bathrooms. The research uncovered that schools require instruction and student engagement. Examples of excellent
updated classrooms, roomy scientific labs, and more co- teaching and learning styles include the provision of well-
curricular activities beyond outdoor games and computer equipped labs and libraries, as well as effective classroom
labs. The study also indicated that learning, boarding, and settings. Also, according to [7], to ensure that children have
co-curricular infrastructure improved student the best possible academic performance, the infrastructure of
achievement. The interviews showed that SHS teachers schools should be maintained regularly. To provide today's
believed school infrastructure improves academic formal education instructions in Africa, there has to be a
achievement. The study suggests building and positioning greater level of school infrastructure. The accessible
school structures well and stocking and expanding school educational infrastructure at a specific school has a significant
laboratories to serve all pupils to increase academic impact on the academic success of students enrolled there [5],
performance. To facilitate subject instruction, the [9]. This suggests that the school that has complete school
school's ICT lab needs extra computers and supplies. infrastructures and is well equipped delivers greater academic
performance for its pupils than the school that does not have
Keywords:- Infrastructural Challenges, Academic complete school infrastructures and is well equipped. In
Performance, Senior High Schools, Mixed Methodology. addition, factors like furniture, the quality of the air within the
building, and the number of students in each class are
I. INTRODUCTION significant infrastructure-related variables that influence the
effectiveness of teaching and learning [5]. To varying degrees,
It is generally agreed that education is the essential education in Ghana is funded and supplied by the state, local
building block for societal, economic, scientific, and communities, individual families, for-profit businesses, and
technological progress [1]. Education is a highly important non-governmental organizations (NGOs). According to
factor that plays a significant role in determining a person's Graham (2013), beginning at age six (6), students can enroll
life opportunities, and this factor is present in both developed in school for a total of twelve (12) years. This breaks down to
and developing countries [2]. Schooling is seen as valuable in two (2) years in kindergarten, six (6) years in primary, three
and of itself, in addition to its economic value, and is (3) years in junior high, three (3) years in senior high, and four
considered a fundamental human right concerning the (4) years in tertiary (2-6-3-3-4 system). This analysis of the
elementary and secondary levels of education [3]. According state of education in Ghana aims to fill in some of the gaps in
to [4], in addition to its importance for the country's economic our understanding by illuminating major problems with
and social growth, education is equally significant. An enrolment, summing up the results of previous studies, and
education of appropriate quality has to be supported by an pointing us toward new avenues for investigation [10]. Access
adequate infrastructure to achieve optimum production. This to basic education has been catered for by the free SHS
is necessary to maximize productivity. The most efficient (FSHS) policy which was instituted a few years ago.
educational environments have full infrastructures [5], which Nevertheless, the infrastructure challenges in SHS in Ghana
will enable a variety of teachers to deliver efficient instruction persist [11]–[13]. The adoption of free secondary education is
while also facilitating the teaching and learning process a step in the right direction, but this good development has to
sufficiently [4]. This has the potential to improve the academic be backed up with additional capital expenditures to meet the
.994 .993 37
Source: Field study (2022)
Table I shows that the data's Cronbach Alpha value is 0.993, higher than the allowable 0.7. The research instrument is
dependable, accurate, and suitable for further study.
Table II summarizes the respondents' school infrastructure data. The majority of respondents said the learning infrastructure is
acceptable and extremely adequate since all statement mean values were more than 3.0. They were unavailable and extremely
insufficient for a minority of respondents.
Table III summarizes respondents' school learning infrastructure data. The mean values of all items except one were larger
than 3.0, indicating that most respondents agreed and strongly agreed with the questionnaire questions about student access to
learning infrastructure. This reveals that highly agree and agree replies outnumbered strongly disagree and disagree ones.
Table IV summarizes respondents' data about the school's boarding infrastructure. Most items had mean values above 3.0,
indicating that most respondents thought the boarding infrastructure was good and extremely adequate. They were unavailable and
extremely insufficient for a minority of responders.
Table V summarizes student responses on the school's boarding facilities. The mean values of all items were larger than 3.0,
indicating that most respondents agreed and strongly agreed with the questionnaire questions about student boarding infrastructure
availability.
Table VI summarizes respondent data on school co-curricular infrastructure. Most statements had mean values below 3.0,
indicating that the schools lacked co-curricular infrastructure. They were available and extremely adequate for a minority of the
students.
Table VII summarizes student responses on how infrastructure affects academic success. The mean values of all assertions
were less than 3.0, indicating that most respondents disagreed and strongly disagreed with the questionnaire's statements about
infrastructure's effects on kids' academic achievement.
From Table VIII above, the correlation results show that all the independent variables in the study have a strong significant
positive relationship with the dependent variable. The relationship between LI and SP showed a positive relationship coefficient of
0.856 with a p-value of 0.000 significant at the 1% significance level. This shows that learning infrastructure has a strong positive
relationship with students’ academic performance. Moreover, the relationship between BI and SP showed a positive relationship
coefficient of 0.866 with a p-value of 0.000 significant at the 1% significance level. This shows that boarding infrastructure has a
strong positive relationship with students’ academic performance. Finally, the relationship between CI and SP showed a positive
relationship coefficient of 0.8.77 with a p-value of 0.000 significant at the 1% significance level. This shows that co-curricular
infrastructure has a strong positive relationship with students’ academic performance. Therefore, it can be agreed that all three types
of school infrastructure being used in this study have a strong positive relationship with students’ academic performance.
It could be found in Table IX that the coefficient of determination (adjusted R2) for the dependent variable SP is 0.874, which
means that about 87.4% of the variation in the SP variable is explained by the three independent variables capable LI, BI and CI
simultaneously. While the remaining 12.6% is explained by other variables outside the model.
TABLE X. ANOVAA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 2468.453 3 822.818 3652.090 .000b
Residual 355.074 1576 .225
Total 2823.527 1579
a. Dependent Variable: SP
b. Predictors: (Constant), CI, LI, BI
Source: Field study (2022)
F-tests concurrently assess the impact of independent factors on the dependent variable. According to the table, the effect
significance test of LI, CI, and BI concurrently on SP yielded Fcount 989.262 and p = 0.000. The p-value (0.000) is smaller than
the significance threshold (0.01), thus LI, CI, and BI jointly affected SP.
From Table 11, it can be observed that the regression co-efficient of learning infrastructure is 1.334 and coefficient significance
test with the t statistic is tcount equal to 11.379 with an error probability of (p) = 0.000 at the significance level of 0.01. It shows that
the p value (0.001) less than significance level (0.01). So, it can be concluded that partially, LI variable positively affects the SP
variable significantly. Also, it can be observed that the regression co-efficient of boarding infrastructure is 0.921 and coefficient
significance test with the t statistic is tcount equal to -7.776 with an error probability of (p) = 0.000, at the significance level of 0.01. It
shows that the p value (0.000) less than significance level (0.01). So, it can be concluded that partially, BI variable positively and
significantly affects the SP variable. Also, it can be observed that the regression co-efficient of co-curricular infrastructure is 1.088
and coefficient significance test with the t statistic is tcount equal to 20.439 with an error probability of (p) = 0.000, at the significance
level of 0.01. It shows that the p value (0.000) less than significance level (0.01). So, it can be concluded that partially, CS variable
positively affects the SP variable and significantly.
[30] G. Mwanda and R. Midigo, “Understanding the [46] O. A. Asikhia, “Students and teachers’ perception of the
Bottlenecks in Methodological Adoption of causes of poor academic performance in Ogun State
Constructivism in Secondary Schools in Kenya.,” secondary schools [Nigeria]: Implications for
Online Submiss., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 2019. counseling for national development,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci.,
[31] T. L. Strayhorn, College students’ sense of belonging: A vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 229–242, 2010.
key to educational success for all students. Routledge, [47] T. S. Paul, How principal leadership influences teacher
2018. motivation to seek out professional development
[32] A. T. Peter Barrett and and M. U. Tigran Shmis, Diego opportunities on new technology. Grand Canyon
Ambasz, The Impact of School Infrastructure on University, 2015.
Learning. 2019. [48] K. Gidado, “A MODEL FOR PFI
[33] K. Hong and R. Zimmer, “Does investing in school IMPLEMENTATION IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA–
capital infrastructure improve student achievement?,” NIGERIA AS A CASE STUDY,” World Constr. Proj.
Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 53, pp. 143–158, 2016. Manag., p. 110, 2010.
[34] N. Herath, C. Duffield, and L. Zhang, “Public-school [49] M. Jantjies and M. Joy, “Lessons learnt from teachers’
infrastructure ageing and current challenges in perspectives on mobile learning in South Africa with
maintenance,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., no. ahead-of-print, cultural and linguistic constraints,” South African J.
2022. Educ., vol. 36, no. 3, 2016.
[35] U. I. Assoumpta and H. O. Andala, “Relationship [50] E. H. Suliah and Y. Arafat, “Headmaster’s strategy to