Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 77 views

    04 Task Performance1

    Uploaded by

    Caite Viaje
    1. A study compared the adverse effects of a new medication to a placebo in 565 patients, finding 36 in the drug group and 13 in the placebo group experienced nausea. 2. The null hypothesis was that nausea has no effect on treatment, while the alternative hypothesis is that nausea determines treatment. 3. Using a chi-squared test at a 0.10 significance level, the results show a test statistic of 10.53, which exceeds the critical value of 2.17. 4. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that treatment is dependent on the side effect of nausea.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    04 Task Performance1

    Uploaded by

    Caite Viaje
    77 views1 page
    1. A study compared the adverse effects of a new medication to a placebo in 565 patients, finding 36 in the drug group and 13 in the placebo group experienced nausea. 2. The null hypothesis was that nausea has no effect on treatment, while the alternative hypothesis is that nausea determines treatment. 3. Using a chi-squared test at a 0.10 significance level, the results show a test statistic of 10.53, which exceeds the critical value of 2.17. 4. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that treatment is dependent on the side effect of nausea.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. A study compared the adverse effects of a new medication to a placebo in 565 patients, finding 36 in the drug group and 13 in the placebo group experienced nausea. 2. The null hypothesis was that nausea has no effect on treatment, while the alternative hypothesis is that nausea determines treatment. 3. Using a chi-squared test at a 0.10 significance level, the results show a test statistic of 10.53, which exceeds the critical value of 2.17. 4. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that treatment is dependent on the side effect of nausea.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    77 views1 page

    04 Task Performance1

    Uploaded by

    Caite Viaje
    1. A study compared the adverse effects of a new medication to a placebo in 565 patients, finding 36 in the drug group and 13 in the placebo group experienced nausea. 2. The null hypothesis was that nausea has no effect on treatment, while the alternative hypothesis is that nausea determines treatment. 3. Using a chi-squared test at a 0.10 significance level, the results show a test statistic of 10.53, which exceeds the critical value of 2.17. 4. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that treatment is dependent on the side effect of nausea.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    1. A new medication's adverse effects are compared to a placebo.

    The results of a straightforward


    random sample of 565 patients are as follows. Is there sufficient data to infer that the treatment is
    not dependent on the side effect of nausea at a significance level of = 0.10?

    Result Drug Placebo Total


    Nausea 36 13 49
    Non Nausea 254 262 516
    Total 290 275 565

     The null hypothesis Ho: The adverse effect of nausea has no bearing on the treatment.
     The alternative hypothesis H.: The nauseating side effect determines the course of
    treatment.
     The level of significance a = 0.10
     The degrees of freedom: = (2-1) x (2-1) = 1 x 1 = 1
     The test of statistics can be calculated using the table below:
    Row/Column E O (O-E) (O-E)² (O-E)²
    E
    1,1 49∗290 36 10.85 117.72 4.681
    = 25.150
    565
    1,2 49∗275 13 -10.85 117.72 4.936
    =23.849
    565
    2,1 516∗290 254 -10.85 117.72 0.444
    =264.849
    565
    2,2 516∗275 262 10.85 117.72 0.469
    =251.150
    565

    ¿ (O−E)²
    x ²=Ʃ Observe−expected ¿ ² =Ʃ =10.53
    expected E

     The critical value: 2.17


     Decision: Since x²= 10.53 > 2.71. There is enough quantifiable evidence to disprove the
    unreliable hypothesis and support the hypothesis that the treatment and reaction are related.

    You might also like