026c0cf4c873c-Difference Between Rule of Evidence in Civil and Criminal Proceeding

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Difference between rule of evidence in civil and criminal proceeding.

1. In criminal cases, the general rule is that the prosecution bears the burden of proving the guilt
of the defendant and the substantive law defines what the prosecution has to prove to convict
the defendant.
The legal burden of proving a fact in a civil trial is, to put it simply, on the party that claims
that fact. Hence, in civil cases, the plaintiff’s first burden of proof lies. This burden of proof,
however, will shift to the defendant if the defendant denies the allegations and finds a positive
default such as “counterclaim.” The burden of proof in such a case lies with the defendant.
2. Admission shall be made without reservation in criminal cases. It means that accussed admit
each and every criminal element of the alleged offense which includes mens rea and actus
reus elements. However, the party may admit the truth of the whole or any part of the other
party’s case in civil proceedings.
3. In criminal cases, the charges have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt whereas in civil
case the matter is decided on the basis of preponderance of probability.

You might also like