Lab Report Crude Protein Determination-Kjeldahl Method
Lab Report Crude Protein Determination-Kjeldahl Method
Lab Report Crude Protein Determination-Kjeldahl Method
To: Dr. Khairul Faizal Bin Pa’ee Code Subject: CFB 31203
From: Student ID. No.:
1. NUR SYAFIQAH BINTI AMINUDIN 1. 55218220043
2. MOHD ADAM BIN MOHD SOFIAN 2. 55218220016
3. HELMY ISKANDAR BIN AZHAR 3. 55218220046
No. of Group: 1 Date of Experiment: 29th November 2021
Title of Experiment: Crude Protein Determination- Kjedahl Method
Received by: Dr. Khairul Faizal Bin Pa’ee Date of Submission: 26th December 2021
TOTAL MARKS
Lab Technical Report
Course code/name
1.1 Abstract
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the amount of crude protein in a cream cracker
using the Kjeldahl method and compare the acquired result to previously published data on the protein
content of cream crackers. In this experiment, 2g of crushed cream crackers were used as a sample to
analyse the protein content, and the sample was prepared in triplicate. Based on the result of the
experiment, the %protein in the Hup Seng cream cracker was 2.7802
± 0.0608 or 2.7194% to 2.841%, and the coefficient of variation was 2.1869%. However, the result
acquired was less than those obtained in the previous study, with the percentage of protein in a
cream cracker were around 7-8%. This is most likely due to a systemic error in the usage of contaminated
equipment, and the Kjeldahl method has its drawbacks because it is an indirect protein measurement
method that measures the amount of nitrogen rather than the amount of protein.
1.2 Objectives
To determine the amount of crude protein in a cream cracker using the Kjeldahl method.
To compare the acquired result to previously published data on the protein content of cream
crackers.
2.0 Methodology:
A. Digestion
2 g of sample is weighed
with padded on the filter The sample is inserted into
The digestion block is
Three kjeltabs (1000 kjeltabs The digestion is started after
paper. a digestion tube along with
preheated to 420 The tubefilter
rack is removed and
Cu/ 3.5) and 12 ml of H2SO4 are placing the digestion tube with paper.
°C.
B. Distillation (The sample was prepared left the has been digested
carefully added into the the racks into the digestion
digestion tube. in triplicate with one sample cools for 20 minutes,
block. The process takes 75
blank.) and it turns from clear green
(Shake to wet the sample with minutes and is completed
25ml of 4% boric acid (containing bromocresol greeninto
andclear
methyl
bluered indicator) is added to a 250ml o
solution.
acid.) when the sample turns into a
The samples are diluted with 80 ml deionized water.
clear green solution. The digestion tube is attached to the rubber holder, and th
C. Titration
Ingredients include Wheat Flour, Vegetable Oil (Palm Oil), Corn Starch,
Glucose Syrup, Leavening Agent (Ammonium Bicarbonate), Sugar, Full
Cream Milk Powder, Salt, Yeast.
The Kjeldahl method is one of the examples of indirect protein determination. It is usually used in
industries because it is recognised by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC)
International as the official method for food protein determination Mæhre et al. (2018). The Kjeldahl
procedure involves three steps: digestion, where the organic nitrogen is converted into ammonium, NH +;
distillation or neutralisation,
4
where the ammonia, NH is distilled and retained in a receiver vessel; and
titration, where the nitrogen is determined (Goulding et al., 2020). This method releases the nitrogen at a
high temperature, 420°C, into a strong acid, ammonium sulphate (NH4)2SO4, and the content was
measured after the neutralisation and titration. The volume of HCl used to change the colour of the
distillate from light green to slightly pinkish is used to calculate the amount of nitrogen by the formula
below:
Once the nitrogen concentration has been calculated, the crude protein content can be calculated by
multiplying the total nitrogen by the conversion factor, commonly used for all types of food, 6.25 as
formula followed:
Conversion factor 6.25 is based on the assumption that the general nitrogen content in food proteins is
16% and that all nitrogen in foods is protein-bound.
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the amount of crude protein in a cream cracker
using the Kjeldahl method and compare the acquired result to previously published data on the protein
content of cream crackers. In order to achieve the objectives, 2g of crushed cream crackers were used as a
sample to analyse the protein content. The sample was made in triplicate to acquire the standard deviation
and coefficient of variation values, which were used to determine the precision of the data obtained. Based
on table 3.4, the results obtained for the protein percentage of Hup Seng cream cracker was 2.7802 ±
0.0608 or 2.7194% to 2.841%. Meanwhile, the coefficient of variation, CV, for the data obtained from
those three replicates of the samples was 2.1869% which is considered as acceptable because 2.1869% is
less than 5%. Therefore, it shows a high level of precision or repeatability for all three replicates.
However,
based on calculations from Hup Seng - Cream Crackers Calories, Carbs & Nutrition Facts (n.d.), the
percentage of protein content in 1 sachet of Hup Seng cream cracker is 7%. This calculation is reliable
because a study from Sykes & Davidson (2020) claimed that the protein content for cream crackers is in
the range of 7-8%.
This implies that the results acquired from this experiment are lower than those obtained from the
previous study. This is most likely due to a systemic error in the usage of contaminated equipment. In
addition, the Kjeldahl method has its drawbacks because it is an indirect method of protein measurement
that measures the amount of nitrogen rather than the amount of protein (Mæhre et al., 2018). As a
recommendation, the Kjeldahl method can be replaced with the amino acid analysis method as it is a direct
protein determination method. It is also the only protein analysis method whose results will not be
disturbed by contamination of other substances (Mæhre et al., 2018).
5.0 Conclusion:
The experiment was conducted to determine the amount of crude protein in a cream cracker using
the Kjeldahl method and compare the acquired result to previously published data on the protein content of
cream crackers. In this experiment, the protein determination was conducted by using the Kjeldahl method
and Hup Seng cream cracker as the sample. The sample was prepared in three replicates in order to
increase the accuracy and precision level. The result obtained for the %protein in the Hup Seng cream
cracker was 2.7802 ± 0.0608 or 2.7194% to 2.841%, and the coefficient of variation was 2.1869%.
However, the result acquired was less than those obtained in the previous study, with the percentage of
protein in cream cracker in between 7-8%. In conclusion, the results of this experiment indicate that the
Kjeldahl method can be used to estimate the %protein in cream cracker precisely since its CV value is less
than 5%. Nevertheless, it is not accurate in terms of accuracy compared to past research from journals
because the %protein value is found to be lower than in prior studies. This is due to the fact that the
Kjeldahl method has its drawbacks because it is an indirect method of protein measurement that measures
the amount of nitrogen rather than the amount of protein (Mæhre et al., 2018). As a recommendation, the
Kjeldahl method can be replaced with the amino acid analysis method as it is a direct protein
determination method. It is also the only protein analysis method whose results will not be disturbed by
contamination of other substances (Mæhre et al., 2018).
6.0 References:
Goulding, D. A., Fox, P. F., & O’Mahony, J. A. (2020). Milk proteins: An overview (pp. 21–98).
Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815251-5.00002-5
Hup Seng - Cream Crackers calories, carbs & nutrition facts. (n.d.). MyFitnessPal. Retrieved
1651777581
Mæhre, H., Dalheim, L., Edvinsen, G., Elvevoll, E., & Jensen, I.-J. (2018). Protein determination—
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7010005
Sykes, G. B., & Davidson, I. (2020). Crackers. In Biscuit, Cookie and Cracker Process and Recipes
Ability to demonstrates Always demonstrates respect and Good demonstration of respect No demonstration of respect
4 care and respect in equipment care for equipment. and and care for equipment.
set-up. care for equipment.
Total points
UniKL MICET
Psychomotor performance
Ability to demonstrates Always demonstrates respect and Good demonstration of respect No demonstration of respect
4 care and respect in equipment care for equipment. and and care for equipment.
set-up. care for equipment.
Total points
UniKL MICET
Psychomotor performance
Ability to demonstrates Always demonstrates respect and Good demonstration of respect No demonstration of respect
4 care and respect in equipment care for equipment. and and care for equipment.
set-up. care for equipment.
Total points