Asdfjkhndfghbjkhbjkgerhkerfhjk 248975345698346572453 Hasksah

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

UNIVERSITY OF CALOOCAN CITY

COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES


COMPUTER STUDIES DEPARTMENT

EVALUATION INSTRUMENT
(ISO 25010)

Name (Optional):  Date:

Direction: Please check the appropriate column corresponding to your evaluation of the
study entitled “_________________” using the scale below.
Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating

4 Highly Acceptable
3 Very Acceptable
2 Acceptable
1 Not Acceptable

Design Criteria 1 2 3 4

Functional Suitability
1. Functional completeness- Degree to which the set of
functions covers all the specified tasks and user objectives.
2. Functional correctness- Degree to which a product or
system provides the correct results with the needed degree of
precision.
3. Functional appropriateness- Degree to which the functions
facilitate the accomplishment of specified tasks and
objectives.
Performance efficiency
1. Time behavior- Degree to which the response and
processing times and throughput rates of a product or
system, when performing its functions, meet requirements.

2. Resource utilization- Degree to which the amounts and


types of resources used by a product or system, when
performing its functions, meet requirements.

3. Capacity- Degree to which the maximum limits of a product


or system parameter meet requirements.

Compatibility
1. Co-existence- Degree to which a product can perform its
required functions efficiently while sharing a common
environment and resources with other products, without
detrimental impact on any other product.

2. Interoperability- Degree to which two or more systems,


products or components can exchange information and use
the information that has been exchanged.

Usability
1. Appropriateness recognizability- Degree to which users
can recognize whether a product or system is appropriate for
their needs.

2. Learnability- degree to which a product or system can be


used by specified users to achieve specified goals of learning
to use the product or system with effectiveness, efficiency,
freedom from risk and satisfaction in a specified context of
use.
3. Operability- Degree to which a product or system has
attributes that make it easy to operate and control.

4. User error protection- Degree to which a system protects


users against making errors.

5. User interface aesthetics- Degree to which a user interface


enables pleasing and satisfying interaction for the user.

6. Accessibility -Degree to which a product or system can be


used by people with the widest range of characteristics and
capabilities to achieve a specified goal in a specified context
of use.

Reliability

1. Maturity- Degree to which a system, product or component


meets needs for reliability under normal operation.
2. Availability- Degree to which a system, product or
component is operational and accessible when required for
use.
3. Fault tolerance- Degree to which a system, product or
component operates as intended despite the presence of
hardware or software faults.
4. Recoverability- Degree to which, in the event of an
interruption or a failure, a product or system can recover the
data directly affected and re-establish the desired state of the
system.
Security
1. Confidentiality- Degree to which a product or system
ensures that data are accessible only to those authorized to
have access.
2. Integrity- Degree to which a system, product or component
prevents unauthorized access to, or modification of,
computer programs or data.
3. Non-repudiation- degree to which actions or events can be
proven to have taken place, so that the events or actions
cannot be repudiated later.
4. Accountability- Degree to which the actions of an entity
can be traced uniquely to the entity.
5. Authenticity- Degree to which the identity of a subject or
resource can be proved to be the one claimed.

Maintainability

1. Modularity- Degree to which a system or computer


program is composed of discrete components such that a
change to one component has minimal impact on other
components.

2. Reusability- Degree to which an asset can be used in more


than one system, or in building other assets.

3. Analysability. Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with


which it is possible to assess the impact on a product or
system of an intended change to one or more of its parts, or
to diagnose a product for deficiencies or causes of failures,
or to identify parts to be modified.

4. Modifiability- Degree to which a product or system can be


effectively and efficiently modified without introducing
defects or degrading existing product quality.
5. Testability- Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with
which test criteria can be established for a system, product
or component and tests can be performed to determine
whether those criteria have been met.

Portability

1. Adaptability- Degree to which a product or system can


effectively and efficiently be adapted for different or
evolving hardware, software or other operational or usage
environments.

2. Installability- Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with


which a product or system can be successfully installed
and/or uninstalled in a specified environment.

3. Replaceability- Degree to which a product can replace


another specified software product for the same purpose in
the same environment.

Comments/Suggestions:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

You might also like