Child Labour in India
Child Labour in India
Child Labour in India
ABSTRACT
“If we are to teach real peace in this world, and if we are to carry on a real war against
war, we shall have to begin with the children." Mahatma Gandhi
The issue of child labour is a frontline concern in India, as early entry into labour market at
formative stage of life does mean absconding from proper schooling leading to loss of future
scope of better livelihood. Child labour is a complex problem basically rooted in poverty.
And at the same time the nation bears the deadly consequences of this curse of the society.
Children under fourteen comprise 3.6 per cent of the total labour force in India. Nearly
eighty-five percent are engaged in the traditional agricultural sector, less than nine per cent
in manufacturing, services and repairs and about 0.8 per cent are in factories.
A growing phenomenon is using children as domestic workers in urban areas. The conditions
in which children work is completely unregulated and they are often made to work without
food, and very low wages, resembling situations of slavery. There are cases of physical,
sexual and emotional abuse of child domestic workers. The argument for domestic work is
often that families have placed their children in these homes for care and employment. The
elimination of child labour is a priority and is being implemented at the grass roots level in
India. A large number of non-governmental and voluntary organizations are involved in this
process along with national and international organizations.
In this paper we intend to give the scenario in which child labour gets increased and various
challenges that have emerged due to this particular problem are also elaborated. The
required efforts to overcome these problems are proposed. Finally we conclude that the
proposed solution may be found worthy in overcoming the challenges that have emerged due
to the child labour.
Keywords: Abuse, Child labour, Poverty, Society.
I. INTRODUCTION
CHILD LABOUR: MEANING
The Child labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act1986 defines a child as any person who has
not completed his fourteenth year of age. Part II of the act prohibits children from working in
any occupation listed in Part A of the Schedule, which include among others, domestic work,
dhabas & hotels, catering at railway establishments, construction work on the railway or
anywhere near the tracks, plastics factories and automobile garages. The act also prohibits
children from working in places where certain processes are being undertaken, as listed in
Part B of the Schedule, which include among others, beedi making, tanning, soap
manufacture, brick kilns and roof tiles units. These provisions do not apply to a workshop
where the occupier is working with the help of his family or in a government recognized or
aided school.
According to International labour Organization (ILO), the term ‘child labour’ is often defined
as work that deprives children of their childhood, their potential and their dignity, and that is
harmful to physical and mental development.
It refers to work that is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful to
children; and interferes with their schooling by depriving them of \the opportunity to attend
school; obliging them to leave school prematurely; or requiring them to attempt to combine
school attendance with excessively long and heavy work.child labour has been defined
differently, and therefore, no universally accepted definition of child labour is available at
present.
In India, the definition of child labour in terms of age; differed from year to year under
different legislations. The Factories Act, 1948 prohibits children below the age of 14 years
from working in any factory. The minimum age in the Mines Act, 1952 is 15 years. It is 12
years in the Plantations Labour Act, 1951.
Throughout the world child labour has been an area of lively debate for about a decade with
much different view point on the issue. However for the economic historians, sociologists,
and anthropologists, child labour is not merely a contemporary phenomenon. Development
economists also argue that such withdrawal was facilitated by substantial improvement in the
socio-economic condition of the people in the industrial economies. By this argument child
labour represents a stage in the development process through which economies must pass.
However in recent times there has been a renewed attack on child labour citing grounds of
physical, moral and psychological trauma for the children and loss of childhood. Such
arguments have been stimulated by recent debates on human rights, human capital formation
and international labour standards. It is argued that child labour exists in developing countries
because there are both demand for and supply of it. Faced with poverty, inequality, social
norms, credit-land-labour market imperfections, high fertility and unpredictable employment
scenario children are sent to work in most cases by their parents.
The supplementary income of children raises their nutritional standards, enables their siblings
to continue education and enhance their skill and future prospect of employment. On the
other hand producers demand child labour because of substantially lower wages paid to
children. Therefore child labour exists. The incidence of child labour is accepted either as an
undesired reality or as an unavoidable necessity. In spite of various stringent labour laws the
problem of child labour put forward a serious challenge to the development process in the
underdeveloped economies.
In 1987 the Government of India adopted the National Child Labour Policy.
The pioneering work in this regard was by Basu and Van (1998). Other important studies
include Lieten and Ben (2001), Grootaert and Kanbur (1995), Anker (2000), Bhalotra (2000),
Basu(1999), Galli (2001), Jafarey and Lahiri (2002), Rammohan (2000), Rosati and Deb
(2002) among others.
Empirical studies on Child Labour, apart from determining the trends/magnitude of child
labour, also tests the validity of several theoretical postulates that have been forwarded
regarding causes, impacts and policy sensitiveness of child labour. These include Ashagrie
(1993), Grootaert and Patrinos (1999), Bhalotra and Heady (2003), Beegle et al. (2003a,
2003b), Goldin and Katz (2003), Edmonds (2004a, 2004b), Bourguignon et al. (2003),
Weiner (1991), Ravallion and Wodon (2000), Addison et al (1997), Ray (2000a, 2000b).
Empirical Studies in Indian Context include those by Chaudhuri and Wilson (2000), Ray
(2000c), Cigno and Rosati (2000), Burra (1995), Mishra (2000), Chandrashekkar (1997),
Weiner (1991), Majumdar (2001), and Reddy (2000).
In most of these studies, the focus has been on children ‘working’ as wage earners, i.e. those
who are in the labour market. However, this underestimates the contribution of the children,
especially that of the girl-child, in the economy (and society) by not considering economic
and non- economic domestic duties performed by children. These duties are by no means
negligible as Nowhere Children (those neither in labour market nor in school) are
considerably more in developing countries than the number of child workers.
III. OBJECTIVES
1. To reveal the reasons and consequences of child labour in India.
2. To find the effective measures to eradicate child labour from its roots
V. DISCUSSIONS
1. CHILD LABOUR: HISTORY
The Child labour in India can be well understood by bifurcating it into three perspectives that
is: ancient, medieval and modern.
The economic status of the slaves, hired labourers and unskilled workers was worse. The
same was the position of child when he was engaged in agricultural sector. It is revealed that
child labour in ancient India was very common and could be witnessed in different
occupations where they were engaged by the rich landlords to carryout activities directly or
indirectly related to their agriculture sector.
A. HEALTH HAZARDS
Tuberculosis and bronchitis
Muscle atrophy
Weakening and malformation of bones
Eye diseases
Stunted growth
Finger Arthritis
Damage to the finger nails
Excessive fatigue and malnutrition effects, functioning of endocrine glands.
a. National Policy for Children 1974: It is the first policy document concerning the
needs and rights of children. It recognized children to be a supremely important
asset to the country. The goal of the policy is to take the next step in ensuring the
constitutional provisions for children and the UN Declaration of Rights are
implemented. It outlines services the state should provide for the complete
development of a child, before and after birth and throughout a child's period of
growth for their full physical, mental and social development.
b. National Policy on Education, 1986: It was called for "special emphasis on the
removal of disparities and to equalize educational opportunity," especially for
Indian women, Scheduled Tribes (ST) and the Scheduled Caste (SC)
communities. To achieve these, the policy called for expanding scholarships, adult
education, recruiting more teachers from the SCs, incentives for poor families to
send their children to school regularly, development of new institutions and
providing housing and services. The NPE called for a "child-centred approach" in
primary education, and launched "Operation Blackboard" to improve primary
schools nationwide.
c. National Policy on child Labour, 1987: It contains the action plan for tackling
the problem of child labour. It envisaged a legislative action plan focusing and
convergence of general development programmes for benefiting children
wherever possible, and Project-based plan of action for launching of projects for
the welfare of working children in areas of high concentration of child labour.
e. National Population Policy 2000: The national population policy 2000 aims at
improvement in the status of Indian children. It emphasized free and compulsory
school education up to age 14, universal immunization of children against all
vaccine preventable diseases, 100% registration of birth, death, marriage and
pregnancy, substantial reduction in the infant mortality rate and maternal mortality
ratio etc.
f. National Health Policy 2002: The main objective of this policy is to achieve an
acceptable standard of good health amongst the general population of the country.
The approach is to increase access to the decentralized public health system by
establishing new infrastructure in deficient areas, and by upgrading the
infrastructure in the existing institutions. Overriding importance is given to
ensuring a more equitable access to health services across the social and
geographical expanse of the country.
In spite of several focused initiatives addressing the various needs of children in India,
it is very evident from the Statistics presented in the coming chapters that, a lot need
to be done to improve their condition in all realms of child survival, child
development and child protection. The gender inequality is also wide in these areas,
calling for special attention on girl child.
The States of Uttar Pradesh and Delhi together accounted for 47.6% kidnapping and
abduction of children reported in the Country.
The States of Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra together accounted for
44.5% of the child rape cases reported in the Country in 2011.
A total of 132 cases of foeticide were reported in 2011, of which the highest number
registered from Madhya Pradesh, followed by Chhattisgarh and Punjab and these
States together reported 56% of the total Foeticide registered in 2011 in the Country.
Maharashtra accounted for 74% of the total 27 cases of ‘buying of girls for
prostitution’ and West Bengal has accounted for 77% of the total 113 cases of ‘selling
of girls for prostitution’.
A total of 113 cases under prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 were reported in
the country out of which highest were reported in West Bengal (25), followed by
Maharashtra(19), Andhra Pradesh(15), Gujarat(13) and Karnataka(12).during 2006-
2011, the trend in human trafficking cases reported under the heads of ‘Procuration of
Minor Girls, Importation of girls, Selling of girls for prostitution, Buying of girls for
prostitution Immoral Traffic (Prev.)Act’, shows an overall declining trend, with year
to year variation. From nearly 5000 cases in 2006, it declined over the years, touching
the lowest in 2009 (2848 cases) increased to 3422 cases in 2010, and 3517 cases in
2011.
In 2011, 69% of cases of human trafficking are cases booked under Immoral Traffic
(Prevention) Act 1956, though there is a decline of 2.6% in 2011 compared to 2010.
Andra Pradesh accounted for 20.4% and Tamilnadu accounted for 17.2% cases of
cases under this category, in 2011.
The increasing trend in incidence of Juvenile Crimes (under IPC) is a matter of grave
concern, though the percentage of juvenile crimes to total crimes is around 1% during
2001 to 2011.
First of all the major responsibility is for we the people to live in the society. It starts in your
home. Never make any servant do work underage. Give some financial help to the street
boys. Unite people who want to help them. Make welfare groups. Give children education
and give them shelter and food. If we all work from our own place as far as we can, then it is
possible to have a result. Never put any child to hard and heavy work in an industry. Boycott
the people who are doing this and raise your voice against them. Make them know the law of
crime like child labour. Raise awareness to the people. Come forward and take your own
responsibility and make your own judgments.
Secondly, governments can play a huge role. First of all they can make the proper law against
child labour and enforce them strictly against people who are putting the children to heavy
work. Governments also should assure shelter, food, education and all basic needs for
children. A child should be as free as he is in heaven. Remember, children are also a tool for
criminal to their crime. Governments of a country should be aware and take necessary steps
for that.
Lastly, we are living in an era of globalization. The various international organizations can
take steps to raise awareness to the people to stop child labour. They can help children
financially by giving them free education at education for all programme and putting pressure
on the government to enforce the law to provide necessary elements for the welfare of
children. The combination of the above bodies will make it easy to eradicate children's ill
health.
Children are the sign of innocence and purity. Your heart should melt in tears when you see
them sleeping in the street with a hungry belly if you are a real human. We the youth raise
our voice. Make this world a better place for the upcoming generation.
VI. CONCLUSION
It is evident that incidence of Child Labour is decreasing in India over the recent past.
However, still 40 million children are out of school of which 6 million are working outside
home. Major problem is the presence of a large mass of Nowhere Children, who are neither
working nor going to school.
If we look at the plausible determining factors, poverty emerges to be a necessary but not a
sufficient condition for thriving of child labour. While poverty is instrumental in keeping the
children out of school, it does not necessarily drive them into the labour market. It is only the
presence of other complementary factors like lack of educational infrastructure that appears
to play a much more crucial role in pushing children to work. The physical component of
educational infrastructure is no doubt important in this respect but the humane factor is
emerging to be more important.
Educational infrastructure is also observed to play a very important role in this regard and
therefore spatial expansion of educational infrastructure with more emphasis on elementary
education would be very useful in eradicating child labour. An emerging idea regarding
educational infrastructure is that at the aggregate level we have to some extent overcome the
stage where there was acute shortage of physical infrastructure viz. lack of school buildings
etc. It is believed that now the bottleneck arises mainly in terms of the human component,
namely availability of teachers. The main task therefore is to ensure that the schools are
adequately staffed and teachers have ample time to take care of individual students.
This will also make learning enjoyable and attract & retain young children in schools. The
nature of working of the schools also needs to be revamped as informal institutions started
under different schemes of Sarva Shikhsa Mission (SSM) are often found to be highly
effective in bringing out of school children under the umbrella of education. It is quite
interesting that proportion of children attending educational institutes in subsidiary status is
increasing over time and can be attributed to SSM. Perhaps the non-conventional schooling
hours and informal system of teaching have suited them whereby they can attend classes even
after finishing their assigned duties. Such an approach will fulfil the promise of right to
education of children without compromising on their broader right to (earn and) live.
REFERENCES
Basu, Kaushik and Pham Hoang Van (1998) - “The Economics of Child Labour,” American
Economic Review, Vol. 88. No. 3 (September), pp.412-427.
Beegle, Kathleen, Rajeev Dehejia, and Roberta Gatti, (2003a) – “Why should we care about
childlabor? The education, labor market, and health consequences of child labor”, Policy
Research Working Paper Series 3479, The World Bank.
Bhalotra, Sonia and Christopher Heady (2003) - “Child Farm Labor: The Wealth Paradox,”
World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 17. No. 2, pp.197-227.
Burra, Neera (1995) - Born to work: Child labour in India, Oxford University Press, New
Delhi.
Chandrashekkar, C.P. (1997) - “The economic consequences of the abolition of child labour:
An Indian case study”, Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1997, pp. 137-179.
Chaudhuri, D.P. and E.J. Wilson (2000) – “The Challenge of Child Labour in Rural India: A
Multi-Dimensional Problem in Need of an Orchestrated Response”, University of
Woolongong Working Paper, No 2000-2: Australia.
Galli, Rosanna (2001) – “The economic impact of child labour”, Decent Work Research
Programme Discussion Paper DP/128, ILO. International Institute of Labour Studies,
Geneva, 32 p.,2001.
Grootaert, Christiaan and Ravi Kanbur (1995) – “Child labour: An economic perspective”,
International Labour Review, Vol. 134, No. 2
ILO (2002) - Every Child Counts: New Global Estimates on Child Labour, ILO, Geneva.
Jafarey, Saqib and SajalLahiri (2002) - “Will trade sanctions reduce child labour? The role of
credit markets”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2002, pp. 137-156.
Majumdar, Manabi (2001) - “Child labour as a human security problem: Evidence from
India”, Oxford
Development Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2001, pp. 279-304.
Mishra, Lakshmidhar (2000) - Child labour in India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Rammohan, Anu (2000) - “The interaction of child labour and schooling in developing
countries: A theoretical perspective”, Journal of Economic Development, Vol. 25, No. 2,
2000, pp. 85-99.