Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Along this line, Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) began his famous Politics with the observation
that “ man by nature is a political animal”. This is a common saying and it gives the
following meanings:
a. The essence of social existence is interaction with other people. When two
or more people interact with each other, they are simply invariably
involved in political relationships ( power, authority, legitimacy and
influence ).
b. Relating with other people is an inevitable phenomenon in which very few
people would want to live in isolation from others.
c. As people crave for social companionship, they are engaged in politics.
d. Involving one’s self in a setting designed to resolve social conflict and set
collective goals means engaging in politics.
Between the sixteenth and early twentieth centuries, “politics” was understood
more narrowly than it was by the Greeks when Jean Bodin (1530-1596 ), a French
political philosopher coined the term “ Political Science ”. The concern of the field was
more on the organization of institutions related to law. The restricted scope of it was
reinforced by Montesquieu (1689-1755), who believed that all the functions of
government could be encompassed within the categories of legislations, execution and
the adjudication of law. These categories found their way into the Constitution of the
United States. It is in this view that Political Science, as a field of study focus on the
three branches of government: the Executive that enforces laws, the Legislative that
makes laws and the Judiciary that interprets and settles controversies about law. From
these branches arise other and more different groups in politics like political parties,
interest groups or pressure groups, lobbies and with formal institutions of the state
formed to carry its functions.
Later, Political Science finally won its spurs as a science since it becomes a
systematic field of study, with its theories, principles and laws and because modern
political scientists use empirical methods, mathematics and statistics and logic for their
research and analysis.
The Ancient Rome contributed much to the study of Political Science. Its
focus was more chiefly in the fields of law, jurisprudence and public administration. The
imprint of Stoic notions of human equality, the brotherhood of all men, the Fatherhood of
God, and the unique value of the individual, gave a deeper view about the divine reason
animating the universe. Included as part of Stoicism, is the philosophy of democracy
with the assumptions of human rationality, morality and equality and concepts of natural
law and natural rights. This was later on incorporated to Western Political Thought.
Let us consider that during the Middle Ages, The Church was a very powerful
institution; more important than the state. It possessed even the power to crown and
dispose princess and to dictate public policy. It is in this view that Political Philosophy
was inferior to the branch of Theology. This medieval age left a legacy of concepts that
are still vital parts of modern political thought, such as the influence of church over the
state in terms of policy or decision-making. The Christian philosophers called it as the “
peace of God ”, the “ fair wage”, the “ just price”, and the idea of a “ higher law”, that
was necessarily superior to the commands of a ruler or the state. This thing carried the
idea of Plato about the so called, “philosopher-king” (pope) that becomes the
embodiment of absolute truth ( God’s revealed law).
When national states of Western Europe emerged, it shook off the shackles
of both the pope and the Holy Roman Emperor. Reforms were introduced. Niccolo
Machiavelli tried to divorce politics from religion. Other political scientists were
influenced by new discoveries and theories in politics. Newton and Descartes, not only
in mathematics and physics, also contributed concepts in Political Science.
Prior to the 19th century, Political Science was regarded as only a minor
branch of philosophy or history. It was then known as “Political Philosophy” or “Political
Economy”. It was not given academic status as an independent discipline.
In 1886, twenty one years after the Civil War, Columbia University published
the Political Science Quarterly, the first Political Science journal of the world. About the
same period, various books appeared, written by academic experts such as T.D.
Woolsey, Woodrow Wilson and James Bryce. Woodrow Wilson was then the President
of Princeton University and became one of the Presidents of the United States ( 1913-
1921).
It is also the Americans who founded the first courses on Political Science,
and as part of their colonial heritage of the Philippines, they encouraged the Filipinos in
the study of government. In 1908, the University of the Philippines was founded by the
American colonial government with the Department of Political Science.
It is very important to remember that there are two general approaches to the
study of politics:
C. Executive Process
It covers the most visible symbol of the state: its Chief Executive, his powers
and functions and responsibilities toward its citizens. Being the head of the
state and government, his performance is likewise measured on the type
and status of the country’s foreign relations. Through his good leadership,
the bureaucracy is seen as well-organized with all its agencies functioning
under the “good governance”.
D. Administrative Organization and Behavior
Covers administrators of the bureaucratic levels with their respective roles,
responsibilities and personality types, including their decision-making and
planning capacities. The inter-related functions of the different agencies and
departments, with operational and effective collaboration among them,
connotes an organized bureaucracy.
E. Legislative Politics
It covers how laws are made, not only in terms of constitutional prescription
or the unwritten conventions but on the clash of interests inside and outside
the legislative arena.
I. Comparative Politics
It looks into some universal characteristics of political processes, but more
intently to consider the differences underlying operations of the bureaucracy.
There can never be an identification of the best political approaches in all
nations, because each has their own unique characteristics that make up
their own political system like culture, race, religion, ideologies and among
others.
J. Political Development
This differs with political growth and modernization. It is more encompassing
as it could include both terms. Political growth for example covers an
increase in IGP and modernization includes the presence of fashion and fads
which people adhere for the time being.
Historical Method
The historical method enlightens the students of politics on the origin and
evolution of the state and institutions, by seeking to explain what they were in
the past, what they are present are and what they will be. The historical
approach will make the students interested in knowing not only the origin of
the state, its government and practices, but also the forces and factors that
influence its growth and development. In other words, students should
depend much upon the evidence of past experiences of the state in order to
be able to explain the present and future development of its institutions.
Comparative Method
The comparative method in the study of Political Science brings into focus
contemporary political institutions and practices of various countries at
different periods of history. From this focus, students can draw similarities
and differences in the structures and systems of the governments of these
countries, in their laws and constitutions, in their judicial system, in their Local
Government Units, in their electoral processes, political parties, and even in
the culture and customs of their peoples.
Analytical Method
The study of a state and its political institutions depend on history in knowing
its origin, its growth and development, and its institutions. An analysis of the
causes and factors that influence the state’s growth and development makes
it necessary for political writers to rely on historical facts. Thus, knowledge of
historical foundations of the state will help political thinkers in analyzing and
describing present political phenomena, and consequently enables them to
provide, through the lessons of the past, direction to and meaning for the
future.
It has been said by some political writers that Psychology is the foundation of
Political Science. This is through the study of men’s political behavior. The
close relationship of Political Science to psychology may also be understood
in the study of political dynamics where students learn a lot about the
operation of political parties to achieve their main goal of controlling the
government. Psychology’s contribution to Political science can also be
appreciated in the study of public opinion which is influenced by two factors:
propaganda and pressure groups.
Ideally, the study of politics should contribute to the general progress and
development of humanity and not to perpetuate the greed for power of few individuals,
which from time immemorial, has been the root cause of man’s inhumanity towards
each other. Students of Politics should use the knowledge they acquire from their study
to educate people, assuming of course that by dealing with the study of politics they
have already educated themselves, for better citizenship. Students of Politics, in short,
should help equip people with intellectual resources that will catapult them to greater
heights of human resources and which will make their existence more meaningful and
satisfying. On the end view, politics should be for advancing the general interests and
not personal interests. Deviations from the “oughts” of politics should be considered as
to arouse each individuals to correct the common notion of politics as a dirty thing.